Theory and Modeling of Field Electron Emission from Low-Dimensional

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theory and Modeling of Field Electron Emission from Low-Dimensional Theory and Modeling of Field Electron Emission from Low-Dimensional Electron Systems by Alex Andrew Patterson B.S., Electrical Engineering University of Pittsburgh, 2011 M.S., Electrical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013 Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2018 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018. All rights reserved. Author.............................................................. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science January 31, 2018 Certified by. Akintunde I. Akinwande Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Leslie A. Kolodziejski Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Theses 2 Theory and Modeling of Field Electron Emission from Low-Dimensional Electron Systems by Alex Andrew Patterson Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on January 31, 2018, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering Abstract While experimentalists have succeeded in fabricating nanoscale field electron emit- ters in a variety of geometries and materials for use as electron sources in vacuum nanoelectronic devices, theory and modeling of field electron emission have not kept pace. Treatments of field emission which address individual deviations of real emitter properties from conventional Fowler-Nordheim (FN) theory, such as emission from semiconductors, highly-curved surfaces, or low-dimensional systems, have been de- veloped, but none have sought to treat these properties coherently within a single framework. As a result, the work in this thesis develops a multidimensional, semi- classical framework for field emission, from which models for field emitters of any dimensionality, geometry, and material can be derived. The effects of quantum confinement and emitter tip geometry on the properties of emission were investigated by utilizing the framework to derive models for: i) a highly-curved, nanoscale, metal emitter tip; ii) a bulk silicon emitter with a surface quantum well formed due to electric field penetration and a mechanism that limits the maximum conduction band emitted current density (ECD) to the bulk flux density supply; and iii) a cylindrical silicon nanowire emitter. Results from a highly-curved, nanoscale, metal emitter tip reveal that despite significant electron supply reductions as a result of quantum confinement, the emitted current density (ECD) increases as the emitter radius decreases due to the effects of electric field enhancement. Addition- ally, emitters with radii smaller than 5 nm exhibit a narrow total energy distribution and highly non-linear FN plots. Consistent with experimental observations, the sat- uration of the conduction band ECD in silicon emitters leads to the appearance of three distinct regions in FN plots, which signify conduction-band-dominated, valence- band-dominated, and transitional regimes of emission. Confinement of electrons to a nanowire emitter geometry further reduces the electron supply available for emission and, consequently, the conduction band saturation ECD. Overall, findings show that the dimensionality, geometry, and material of field emitters all play a critical role in field emission processes at the nanoscale. Ac- cordingly, the semiclassical framework for field emission is intended to form a solid foundation upon which more complete models of emission can be developed. Thesis Supervisor: Akintunde I. Akinwande Title: Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 3 4 Acknowledgments There are many people who have supported me over the course of my time at MIT and I would like to thank them here. For those of you I may not have mentioned, thanks go out to you as well. Foremost, I would like to thank my research advisor and mentor, Professor Tayo Akinwande, for his guidance, encouragement, and constant support. I am especially grateful for the independence he granted me during my time at MIT, particularly in choosing the direction of my research and by allowing me to leave Cambridge to undertake an internship in Germany near the end of my doctoral studies. He has instilled in me the importance of crafting a compelling narrative from my work, the resolve to leave no stone unturned, and the discipline to always \do my due diligence". Under his supervision, I have grown immensely as a researcher and I look forward to his continued mentorship in my career. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Professor Terry Orlando and Professor Dirk Englund, who have provided me with useful feedback during the course of my thesis work. I have known Professor Orlando as long as I have been at MIT; he has guided me as my housemaster, academic counselor, and supervising professor during my teaching assistantship and has supported me in both my research and teaching aspirations. Professor Englund has always advised me to tie the find- ings of my work to experimental results, from which I have developed a valuable understanding of the \other side" of field emission research. From enlightening evenings at the library to the annual IVNC trips, the members of the Akinwande group have been great people to spend my time with daily. In particular, I would like to thank Melissa, Steve, Arash, Neptune, Andy, and Nedo. Thank you as well to others in the MTL community, particularly Dennis and Sabino, for the moments of comic relief and hilarious cookie social discussions. I would also like to thank my friends in Cambridge, and elsewhere, for all of 5 the amazing memories over the years, especially Parker, Joel, Cait, Guha, Joey, Michael, Mike, Dave, Stephen, all the young lads, assorted degases, and the three- time-champion GAME softball team. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Pat and Steve, my brother Ryan, cousin Dan, cousin Nickie, Aunt Pam, Uncle John, Pete, Ksenia, Sonny, and the rest of my family for their continual support and for always reminding me of where to find home. May we all gather around the shagbark for years to come. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1122374. 6 Contents 1 Introduction 35 2 Background 39 2.1 Current State of Field Emission Theory . 39 2.2 Fowler-Nordheim Theory . 40 2.2.1 Elementary Fowler-Nordheim Equation . 41 2.2.2 Fowler-Nordheim Plots . 44 2.2.3 Standard Fowler-Nordheim Equation: Murphy-Good Theory . 45 2.2.4 Fowler-Nordheim-Type Equations . 47 2.3 Emission from Semiconductors . 48 2.3.1 Emission from the Conduction Band: EF > EC (zs)...... 51 2.3.2 Emission from the Conduction Band: EF < EC (zs)...... 53 2.3.3 Emission from the Valence Band: EF > EV (zs)........ 53 2.3.4 Emission from Surface States . 55 2.3.5 Emission from Accumulation Layer Bound States . 57 2.4 Emission from Highly-Curved Emitter Tips . 58 2.4.1 Field Enhancement Factors . 59 2.4.2 Generalized Fowler-Nordheim Equation for Non-Planar Emitters 60 2.4.3 Semiclassical, Multidimensional Tunneling . 62 2.5 Emission from Low-Dimensional Emitters . 69 7 2.6 Chapter Summary . 73 3 Semiclassical Framework for Field Electron Emission 75 3.1 Introduction . 75 3.2 Semiclassical Solution to the Multidimensional Schr¨odingerEquation 77 3.2.1 Zeroth Order Wave Function: Classical Hamilton-Jacobi Equa- tion . 80 3.2.2 First Order Wave Function: Continuity Equation . 81 3.3 Emitted Current Density Equation . 83 3.3.1 Incident Current Density . 85 3.3.2 Electron Transmission Probability . 86 3.3.3 Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization . 91 3.3.4 Complete Expression for Emitted Current Density . 93 3.4 Model Assumptions and their Consequences . 93 3.4.1 Quantum Potential . 94 3.4.2 Local Density of States . 96 3.4.3 Semiclassical, Multidimensional Tunneling Model . 98 3.5 Chapter Summary . 100 4 Field Electron Emission from a Low-Dimensional, Highly-Curved Metal Tip 101 4.1 Introduction . 101 4.2 Definition of Paraboloidal Emitter System . 102 4.2.1 Three-Dimensional Parabolic Coordinates . 102 4.2.2 Physical Definition of the Emitter Cathode . 104 4.2.3 Emitter System Electrostatics . 106 4.3 Derivation of Emitted Current Density Equation . 110 4.3.1 Semiclassical Wave Functions in Parabolic Coordinates . 111 8 4.3.2 Bohr-Sommerfeld Bound State Energies: EQ .......... 115 4.3.3 Incident Probability Flux Density: [jQ · n^]........... 116 4.3.4 Electron Transmission Probability: DQ ............. 117 4.3.5 Total Energy Distribution and Total Emitted Current Density 120 4.4 Results and Analysis . 120 4.4.1 Bohr-Sommerfeld Energies . 121 4.4.2 Electronic Subband Origin of Emitted Current Density . 127 4.4.3 Spatial Origin of Emitted Current Density . 132 4.4.4 Emitted Current Density vs. Emitter Radius . 136 4.4.5 Total Energy Distribution . 139 4.4.6 Fowler-Nordheim Plots . 143 4.5 Comparison to Experimental Data: Molybdenum Field Emitter Arrays 147 4.6 Chapter Summary . 151 5 Field Electron Emission from Bulk Silicon 153 5.1 Introduction . 153 5.2 Bulk Silicon Emitter Model . 155 5.2.1 Additional Physical Phenomena in Silicon Field Emitters . 155 5.2.2 Energetic Regimes of Emission from Bulk Silicon . 167 5.2.3 Emitted Current Density Equations . 168 5.2.4 Finite Electronic Flux Supply from Conduction Band States . 172 5.2.5 Approximations and Assumptions . 175 5.3 Results and Analysis . 176 5.3.1 Band Edge Profiles and Bound State Energies . 178 5.3.2 Emitted Current Density vs. Applied Field . 182 5.3.3 Total Energy Distribution . 184 5.3.4 Fowler-Nordheim Plots . 188 5.4 Limitations of the Model . 192 9 5.4.1 Omission of Surface States . 192 5.4.2 Zero Emitted Current Approximation . 194 5.4.3 Zero Internal Current Approximation .
Recommended publications
  • Field Electron Emission Characteristic of Graphene
    Field electron emission characteristic of graphene Weiliang Wang, Xizhou Qin, Ningsheng Xu, and Zhibing Li* State Key Lab of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, and School of Physics and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People’s Republic of China Abstract The field electron emission current from graphene is calculated analytically on a semiclassical model. The unique electronic energy band structure of graphene and the field penetration in the edge from which the electrons emit have been taken into account. The relation between the effective vacuum barrier height and the applied field is obtained. The calculated slope of the Fowler-Nordheim plot of the current-field characteristic is in consistent with existing experiments. Keywords: field electron emission, graphene, field penetration PACS: 73.22.Pr, 79.70.+q 1. Introduction The cold field electron emission (CFE) as a practical microelectronic vacuum electron source , that is driven by electric fields of about ten volts per micrometer or less, has been demonstrated by the Spindt-type cathodes, which is basically micro-fabricated molybdenum tips in gated configuration [1] . In recent years, much interest has turned to the nano-structures, such as the carbon nanotubes and nanowires of various materials [2, 3], for that the high aspect ratios of these materials naturally lead to high field enhancement at the tips of the emitters thereby lower the threshold of macroscopic fields for significant emission. So far, most of the experimental efforts and theoretical studies on the possible applications and the physical mechanism of CFE have been concentrated on the quasi one-dimensional structures, such as carbon nanotubes and various nanowires.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Plasmons and Field Electron Emission in Metal Nanostructures
    Surface Plasmons and Field Electron Emission In Metal Nanostructures N. Garcia1 and Bai Ming2 1. Laboratorio de Física de Sistemas Pequeños y Nanotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano 144, Madrid 28006 (Spain) and Laboratório de Filmes Finos e Superfícies, Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Caixa Postal 476, 88.040-900, Florianópolis, SC, (Brazil) 2. Electromagnetics laboratory, School of Electronic Information Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, 100191 (China) Abstract In this paper we discuss the field enhancement due to surface plasmons resonances of metallic nanostructures, in particular nano spheres on top of a metal, and find maximum field enhancement of the order of 102, intensities enhancement of the order of 104. Naturally these fields can produce temporal fields of the order of 0.5V/Å that yield field emission of electrons. Although the fields enhancements we calculated are factor of 10 smaller than those reported in recent experiments, our results explain very well the experimental data. Very large atomic fields destabilize the system completely emitting ions, at least for static field, and produce electric breakdown. In any case, we prove that the data are striking and can solve problems in providing stabilized current of static fields for which future experiments should be done for obtaining pulsed beams of electrons. PACS numbers: 79.70.+q, 36.40.Gk, 79.60.-i Electrons are emitted from surfaces due to the photoelectron effect when the light energy that illuminates the surface is larger than its work function. But also more interesting with the development of pulsed lasers are the multiphoton processes[1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • First Line of Title
    GALLIUM NITRIDE AND INDIUM GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED PHOTOANODES IN PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS by John D. Clinger A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a major in Electrical and Computer Engineering Winter 2010 Copyright 2010 John D. Clinger All Rights Reserved GALLIUM NITRIDE AND INDIUM GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED PHOTOANODES IN PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS by John D. Clinger Approved: __________________________________________________________ Robert L. Opila, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ James Kolodzey, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Kenneth E. Barner, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Michael J. Chajes, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Debra Hess Norris, M.S. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisors Dr. Robert Opila and Dr. James Kolodzey as well as my former advisor Dr. Christiana Honsberg. Their guidance was invaluable and I learned a great deal professionally and academically while working with them. Meghan Schulz and Inci Ruzybayev taught me how to use the PEC cell setup and gave me excellent ideas on preparing samples and I am very grateful for their help. A special thanks to Dr. C.P. Huang and Dr. Ismat Shah for arrangements that allowed me to use the lab and electrochemical equipment to gather my results. Thanks to Balakrishnam Jampana and Dr. Ian Ferguson at Georgia Tech for growing my samples, my research would not have been possible without their support.
    [Show full text]
  • New Thermal Field Electron Emission Energy Conversion Method VE Ptitsin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Electronic Sumy State University Institutional Repository PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NANOMATERIALS: APPLICATIONS AND PROPERTIES Vol. 1 No 4, 04NEA03(4pp) (2012) New Thermal Field Electron Emission Energy Conversion Method V.E. Ptitsin* Institute for Analytical Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 26, Rizhsky Pr., 190103 St. Petersburg, Russia New thermal field electron emission energy conversion method for vacuum electron-optical systems (EOS) with a nanostructured surface electron sources is offered and developed. Physical and numerical modeling of an electron emission and transport processes for different EOS is carried out. It is shown that at the specific configuration of electrostatic and magnetic fields in the EOS offered method permits to realize energy conversion processes with high efficiency. Keywords: Energy conversion, Thermal field electron emission, Nanostructures. PACS numbers: 84.60. – h, 79.70. + q, 85.45.Db 1. INTRODUCTION (less 50 V/μm), some NS (ZrO2/W and ZrO2/Mo) at temperatures of substance NS ≈ 1900 K possess an Achievements of last decades in area of micro-and abnormally high reduced brightness (to 106 A/(cm2 nanotechnology promoted revival of scientific interest sr V)) and high stability of thermal field emission to a problem of direct transformation of thermal and properties. The found out (in specified above physical light energy to electric energy. As a result of conditions) phenomenon of sharp increase NS emission development of nanotechnology methods researchers ability has been named by "abnormal thermal field had new possibilities for use in the workings out of the emission” (ATFE).
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Emission from 2 Dimensional Structures
    Analytical treatment of cold field electron emission from a nanowall emitter XIZHOU QIN, WEILIANG WANG, NINGSHENG XU, ZHIBING LI* State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies School of Physics and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, P.R. China RICHARD G. FORBES Advanced Technology Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom This paper presents an elementary, approximate analytical treatment of cold field electron emission (CFE) from a classical nanowall (i.e., a blade-like conducting structure situated on a flat conducting surface). A simple model is used to bring out some of the basic physics of a class of field emitter where quantum confinement effects exist transverse to the emitting direction. A high-level methodology is presented for developing CFE equations more general than the usual Fowler-Nordheim-type (FN-type) equations, and is applied to the classical nanowall. If the nanowall is sufficiently thin, then significant transverse-energy quantization effects occur, and affect the overall form of theoretical CFE equations; also, the tunnelling barrier shape exhibits "fall-off" in the local field value with distance from the surface. A conformal transformation technique is used to derive an 1 analytical expression for the on-axis tunnelling probability. These linked effects cause complexity in the emission physics, and cause the emission to conform (approximately) to detailed regime-dependent equations that differ
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Vs Bulk Electronic Structures of a Moderately Correlated
    Surface vs bulk electronic structures of a moderately correlated topological insulator YbB6 revealed by ARPES N. Xu,1* C. E. Matt,1,2 E. Pomjakushina,3 J. H. Dil,4,1 G. Landolt, 1,5 J.-Z. Ma,1,6 X. Shi,1,6 R. S. Dhaka,1,4,7 N. C. Plumb,1 M. Radović,1,8 V. N. Strocov, 1 T. K. Kim,9 M. Hoesch, 9 K. Conder,3 J. Mesot,1,2,4 H. Ding,6, 10 and M. Shi1,† 1Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland 2Laboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland 3Laboratory for Developments and Methods, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland 4Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fedé ralé de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 5Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrauss 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland 6Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 7Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India 8 SwissFEL, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland 9Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, UK, 10 Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing, China Page: 1 Systematic angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) experiments have been carried out to investigate the bulk and (100) surface electronic structures of a topological mixed-valence insulator candidate, YbB6. The bulk states of YbB6 were probed with bulk-sensitive soft X-ray ARPES, which show strong three-dimensionality as required by cubic symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Piezo-Phototronic Effect Enhanced UV Photodetector Based on Cui/Zno
    Liu et al. Nanoscale Research Letters (2016) 11:281 DOI 10.1186/s11671-016-1499-1 NANO EXPRESS Open Access Piezo-phototronic effect enhanced UV photodetector based on CuI/ZnO double- shell grown on flexible copper microwire Jingyu Liu1†, Yang Zhang1†, Caihong Liu1, Mingzeng Peng1, Aifang Yu1, Jinzong Kou1, Wei Liu1, Junyi Zhai1* and Juan Liu2* Abstract In this work, we present a facile, low-cost, and effective approach to fabricate the UV photodetector with a CuI/ZnO double-shell nanostructure which was grown on common copper microwire. The enhanced performances of Cu/CuI/ZnO core/double-shell microwire photodetector resulted from the formation of heterojunction. Benefiting from the piezo-phototronic effect, the presentation of piezocharges can lower the barrier height and facilitate the charge transport across heterojunction. The photosensing abilities of the Cu/CuI/ZnO core/double-shell microwire detector are investigated under different UV light densities and strain conditions. We demonstrate the I-V characteristic of the as-prepared core/double-shell device; it is quite sensitive to applied strain, which indicates that the piezo-phototronic effect plays an essential role in facilitating charge carrier transport across the CuI/ZnO heterojunction, then the performance of the device is further boosted under external strain. Keywords: Photodetector, Flexible nanodevice, Heterojunction, Piezo-phototronic effect, Double-shell nanostructure Background nanostructured ZnO devices with flexible capability, Wurtzite-structured zinc oxide and gallium nitride are force/strain-modulated photoresponsing behaviors resulted gaining much attention due to their exceptional optical, from the change of Schottky barrier height (SBH) at the electrical, and piezoelectric properties which present metal-semiconductor heterojunction or the modification of potential applications in the diverse areas including the band diagram of semiconductor composites [15, 16].
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Band Diagrams of Heterostructures
    Herbert Kroemer (1928) 17 Band diagrams of heterostructures 17.1 Band diagram lineups In a semiconductor heterostructure, two different semiconductors are brought into physical contact. In practice, different semiconductors are “brought into contact” by epitaxially growing one semiconductor on top of another semiconductor. To date, the fabrication of heterostructures by epitaxial growth is the cleanest and most reproducible method available. The properties of such heterostructures are of critical importance for many heterostructure devices including field- effect transistors, bipolar transistors, light-emitting diodes and lasers. Before discussing the lineups of conduction and valence bands at semiconductor interfaces in detail, we classify heterostructures according to the alignment of the bands of the two semiconductors. Three different alignments of the conduction and valence bands and of the forbidden gap are shown in Fig. 17.1. Figure 17.1(a) shows the most common alignment which will be referred to as the straddled alignment or “Type I” alignment. The most widely studied heterostructure, that is the GaAs / AlxGa1– xAs heterostructure, exhibits this straddled band alignment (see, for example, Casey and Panish, 1978; Sharma and Purohit, 1974; Milnes and Feucht, 1972). Figure 17.1(b) shows the staggered lineup. In this alignment, the steps in the valence and conduction band go in the same direction. The staggered band alignment occurs for a wide composition range in the GaxIn1–xAs / GaAsySb1–y material system (Chang and Esaki, 1980). The most extreme band alignment is the broken gap alignment shown in Fig. 17.1(c). This alignment occurs in the InAs / GaSb material system (Sakaki et al., 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Surface and Quantum-Well States in Ultra Thin Pt Films on the Au(111) Surface
    materials Article Formation of Surface and Quantum-Well States in Ultra Thin Pt Films on the Au(111) Surface Igor V. Silkin 1,*, Yury M. Koroteev 1,2,3, Pedro M. Echenique 4,5 and Evgueni V. Chulkov 3,4,5 1 Department of Physics, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia; [email protected] 2 Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634050 Tomsk, Russia 3 Department of Physics, Saint Petersburg State University, 198504 Saint Petersburg, Russia 4 Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC), 20018 San Sebastian/Donostia, Basque Country, Spain; [email protected] (P.M.E.); [email protected] (E.V.C.) 5 Department of Materials Physics, Materials Physics Center CFM-MPC and Mixed Center CSIC-UPV, 20080 San Sebastian/Donostia, Basque Country, Spain * Correspondence: igor [email protected]; Tel.: +34-943-01-8284 Received: 21 November 2017; Accepted: 7 December 2017; Published: 9 December 2017 Abstract: The electronic structure of the Pt/Au(111) heterostructures with a number of Pt monolayers n ranging from one to three is studied in the density-functional-theory framework. The calculations demonstrate that the deposition of the Pt atomic thin films on gold substrate results in strong modifications of the electronic structure at the surface. In particular, the Au(111) s-p-type Shockley surface state becomes completely unoccupied at deposition of any number of Pt monolayers. The Pt adlayer generates numerous quantum-well states in various energy gaps of Au(111) with strong spatial confinement at the surface. As a result, strong enhancement in the local density of state at the surface Pt atomic layer in comparison with clean Pt surface is obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiconductor: Types and Band Structure
    Semiconductor: Types and Band structure What are Semiconductors? Semiconductors are the materials which have a conductivity and resistivity in between conductors (generally metals) and non-conductors or insulators (such ceramics). Semiconductors can be compounds such as gallium arsenide or pure elements, such as germanium or silicon. Properties of Semiconductors Semiconductors can conduct electricity under preferable conditions or circumstances. This unique property makes it an excellent material to conduct electricity in a controlled manner as required. Unlike conductors, the charge carriers in semiconductors arise only because of external energy (thermal agitation). It causes a certain number of valence electrons to cross the energy gap and jump into the conduction band, leaving an equal amount of unoccupied energy states, i.e. holes. Conduction due to electrons and holes are equally important. Resistivity: 10-5 to 106 Ωm Conductivity: 105 to 10-6 mho/m Temperature coefficient of resistance: Negative Current Flow: Due to electrons and holes Semiconductor acts like an insulator at Zero Kelvin. On increasing the temperature, it works as a conductor. Due to their exceptional electrical properties, semiconductors can be modified by doping to make semiconductor devices suitable for energy conversion, switches, and amplifiers. Lesser power losses. Semiconductors are smaller in size and possess less weight. Their resistivity is higher than conductors but lesser than insulators. The resistance of semiconductor materials decreases with the increase in temperature and vice-versa. Examples of Semiconductors: Gallium arsenide, germanium, and silicon are some of the most commonly used semiconductors. Silicon is used in electronic circuit fabrication and gallium arsenide is used in solar cells, laser diodes, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Semiconductor Heterostructures
    Semiconductor Optoelectronics (Farhan Rana, Cornell University) Chapter 2 Semiconductor Heterostructures 2.1 Introduction Most interesting semiconductor devices usually have two or more different kinds of semiconductors. In this handout we will consider four different kinds of commonly encountered heterostructures: a) pn heterojunction diode b) nn heterojunctions c) pp heterojunctions d) Quantum wells, quantum wires, and quantum dots 2.2 A pn Heterojunction Diode Consider a junction of a p-doped semiconductor (semiconductor 1) with an n-doped semiconductor (semiconductor 2). The two semiconductors are not necessarily the same, e.g. 1 could be AlGaAs and 2 could be GaAs. We assume that 1 has a wider band gap than 2. The band diagrams of 1 and 2 by themselves are shown below. Vacuum level q1 Ec1 q2 Ec2 Ef2 Eg1 Eg2 Ef1 Ev2 Ev1 2.2.1 Electron Affinity Rule and Band Alignment: How does one figure out the relative alignment of the bands at the junction of two different semiconductors? For example, in the Figure above how do we know whether the conduction band edge of semiconductor 2 should be above or below the conduction band edge of semiconductor 1? The answer can be obtained if one measures all band energies with respect to one value. This value is provided by the vacuum level (shown by the dashed line in the Figure above). The vacuum level is the energy of a free electron (an electron outside the semiconductor) which is at rest with respect to the semiconductor. The electron affinity, denoted by (units: eV), of a semiconductor is the energy required to move an electron from the conduction band bottom to the vacuum level and is a material constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiconductor Science and Leds
    Optoelectronics EE/OPE 451, OPT 444 Fall 2009 Section 1: T/Th 9:30- 10:55 PM John D. Williams, Ph.D. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 406 Optics Building - UAHuntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 Ph. (256) 824-2898 email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tues/Thurs 2-3PM JDW, ECE Fall 2009 SEMICONDUCTOR SCIENCE AND LIGHT EMITTING DIODES • 3.1 Semiconductor Concepts and Energy Bands – A. Energy Band Diagrams – B. Semiconductor Statistics – C. Extrinsic Semiconductors – D. Compensation Doping – E. Degenerate and Nondegenerate Semiconductors – F. Energy Band Diagrams in an Applied Field • 3.2 Direct and Indirect Bandgap Semiconductors: E-k Diagrams • 3.3 pn Junction Principles – A. Open Circuit – B. Forward Bias – C. Reverse Bias – D. Depletion Layer Capacitance – E. Recombination Lifetime • 3.4 The pn Junction Band Diagram – A. Open Circuit – B. Forward and Reverse Bias • 3.5 Light Emitting Diodes – A. Principles – B. Device Structures • 3.6 LED Materials • 3.7 Heterojunction High Intensity LEDs Prentice-Hall Inc. • 3.8 LED Characteristics © 2001 S.O. Kasap • 3.9 LEDs for Optical Fiber Communications ISBN: 0-201-61087-6 • Chapter 3 Homework Problems: 1-11 http://photonics.usask.ca/ Energy Band Diagrams • Quantization of the atom • Lone atoms act like infinite potential wells in which bound electrons oscillate within allowed states at particular well defined energies • The Schrödinger equation is used to define these allowed energy states 2 2m e E V (x) 0 x2 E = energy, V = potential energy • Solutions are in the form of
    [Show full text]