Of Enea Silvio Piccolomini (December 1452, Vienna)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Oration “Sentio” of Enea Silvio Piccolomini (December 1452, Vienna). Edited and translated by Michael von Cotta-Schönberg. 8th version. (Orations of Enea Silvio Piccolomini / Pope Pius II; 20) Michael Cotta-Schønberg To cite this version: Michael Cotta-Schønberg. Oration “Sentio” of Enea Silvio Piccolomini (December 1452, Vienna). Edited and translated by Michael von Cotta-Schönberg. 8th version. (Orations of Enea Silvio Pic- colomini / Pope Pius II; 20). 2019. hal-01075499 HAL Id: hal-01075499 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01075499 Submitted on 1 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. (Orations of Enea Silvio Piccolomini / Pope Pius II; 20) 0 Oration “Sentio” of Enea Silvio Piccolomini (December 1452, Vienna). Edited and translated by Michael von Cotta-Schönberg 8th version 2019 1 Abstract In his capacity as guardian of Ladislaus the Posthumous, Duke of Austria and King of Hungary and Bohemia, Emperor Friederich III of Habsburg had by 1452 ruled Ladislaus’ Austrian lands for more than a decade. Growing dissatisfaction with his rule led to an Austrian rebellion with the aim of freeing Ladislaus from the emperor’s guardianship and transferring the rule of Ladislaus’ territories from Friedrich to a government based in Vienna. The rebellion was successful: Ladislaus was released from the emperor’s guardianship and moved to Vienna where a government was set up in his name. A number of issues were to be settled at a peace conference in Vienna in December, where the emperor was mainly represented by the seasoned imperial diplomat, Enea Silvio Piccolomini, Bishop of Siena. Piccolomini was also a legate of the pope, Nicolaus V, who had supported the newly crowned emperor by issuing a monitorium to the Austrian insurgents. Piccolomini prepared an oration, the “Sentio”, to be held at the conference, vigourously defending both emperor and pope, but the oration was probably not delivered. Key words Enea Silvio Piccolomini; Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini; Æneas Silvius Piccolomini; Pope Pius II; Papa Pio II; Pope Nicholas V; Pope Nicolaus V; Papa Niccolò V; Emperor Frederick III (Habsburg); Kaiser Friedrich III (Habsburg); Holy Roman Empire; Papacy; Austria; Appeals to a council; Austrian rebellion, 1452; Imperial coronations; Papal supremacy; Renaissance orations; Renaissance oratory; Renaissance rhetorics Editor and translator Michael von Cotta-Schönberg Mag. Art. (University of Copenhagen) Bachelier en Philosophie (Université de Louvain) Emeritus Deputy Director / The Royal Library, Copenhagen Emeritus University Librarian / University of Copenhagen ORCID identity: 000-0001-8499-4142 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Foreword In 2007, I undertook a project of publishing the Latin texts with English translations of the orations of Enea Silvio Piccolomini / Pope Pius II. Altogether 801 orations (including papal responses to ambassadorial addresses) are extant today, though more may still be held, unrecognized, in libraries and archives. At a later stage the project was expanded to include ambassadors’ orations to the pope, of which about 40 are presently known. I do not, actually, plan to publish further versions of the present volume, but I do reserve the option in case I – during my future studies - come across other manuscripts containing interesting versions of the oration or if important new research data on the subject matter are published, making it appropriate to modify or expand the present text. It will therefore always be useful to check if a later version than the one the reader may have previously found via the Internet is available. I shall much appreciate to be notified by readers who discover errors and problems in the text and translation or unrecognized quotations. 12 September 2019 MCS 1 81 orations, if the ”Cum animadverto” is counted is a Piccolomini-oration, see oration “Quam laetus” [18], Appendix 3 Table of volumes in Collected Orations of Pope Pius II. 12 vols. Edited and translated by Michael von Cotta-Schönberg 1. Introduction 2. 1436-1444 (Orations 1-5) 3. 1445-1449 (Orations 6-13) 4. 1450-1453 (Orations 14-20) 5. 1454-1455 (Orations 21-25) 6. 1455-1457 (Orations 26-28) 7. 1458-1459 (Orations 29-42) 8. 1459-1459 (Orations 43-51) 9. 1459-1461 (Orations 52-63) 10. 1462-1464 (Orations 64-77) 11. 1454, 1459 (Orations 78-80). Orthographical profiles. Indices 12. Appendix: Ambassadors’ orations to Pope Pius II 4 Table of contents I. INTRODUCTION 1. Context 2. Themes 2.1. Papal supremacy 2.2. Imperial authority 2.3. Appeals from papal decisions 2.4. Austrian rebellion 2.4.1. Testament of King Albrecht II 2.4.2. Agreement between the Austrians and the emperor 2.4.3. Interests of King Ladislaus 2.4.4. Dignity of King Ladislaus 3. Date, place, audience and format 4. Text 4.1. Manuscripts 4.1.1. Version 1 4.1.2. Version 2 4.1.3. Version 3 4.2. Editions 4.3. Present edition 5. Sources 6. Bibliography 7. Sigla and abbreviations II. TEXT AND TRANSLATION 0. Introduction [1-17] 0.1. Captatio Benevolentiae [1-3] 0.2. Parties [4-14] 0.2.1. Counselors [5-6] 0.2.2. Participants [7-11] 0.2.2.1. Clergy [9-10] 0.2.2.2. Laity [11] 0.2.3. King Ladislaus [12-14] 0.3. Subject of oration [15-16] 0.4. Structure of oration [17] 5 1. Popes have final authority in secular matters [18-29] 1.1. Position of the insurgents [18] 1.2. Position of Piccolomini [19-29] 1.2.1. Arguments from Canon law [20] 1.2.2. Arguments from the Old Testament [21] 1.2.3. Arguments from the New Testament [22] 1.2.4. Arguments from historical precedents [23-25] 1.2.5. Conclusion [26-29] 2. Austrians have acted unjustly towards the emperor and they have not acted in the best interest of King Ladislaus [30-86] 2.0. Introduction [30-36] 2.0.1. Position of the insurgents [30] 2.0.2. Position of Picccolomini [31] 2.0.3. Piccolomini’s version of the facts of the case [32-33] 2.0.4. Insurgents’ version [34-35] 2.0.5. Structure of Piccolomini’s reply [36] 2.1. Testament of King Albrecht II [37-39] 2.2. Pact between the Austrians and the emperor [40-45] 2.3. Interests of King Ladislaus [46-76] 2.3.1. Austrians’s disobedience to Ladislaus’ superior, the emperor, is not in the best interest of Ladislaus [46-51] 2.3.2. Austrian complaints about the emperor’s treatment of Ladislaus [52] 2.3.3. Piccolomini’s refutation [53-60] 2.3.3.1. Ladislaus was not treated as a prisoner [53] 2.3.3.2. Ladislaus was given proper nourishment [54] 2.3.3.3. The journey to Rome was not dangerous for Ladislaus but highly advantageous [55-56] 2.3.3.4. Ladislaus was not robbed of his inheritance [57- 58] 2.3.3.5. Hungarians and Bohemians were not slighted [59] 2.3.3.6. Ladislaus has not gained greater freedom and honour [60] 2.3.3.7. Austrian rebellion did not profit Austria [61-65] 2.3.3.8. Austrian rebellion was shameful [66-76] 2.4. Dignity of King Ladislaus [77-86] 3. Papal monitorium is lawful [87-98] 4. Austrian appeal against the monitorium is invalid [99-125] 4.1. Austrians were not molested by the monitorium [101] 4.2. Austrians could not appeal to a higher judge [102-107] 6 4.3. Judge appealed to was not easily accessible [108-120] 4.3.1. Appeal to a better informed pope [108-109] 4.3.2. Appeal to a council [110-113] 4.3.3. Appeal to the Universal Church [114-120] 4.4. Austrians modified the conditions of the matter after the appeal [121] 4.5. Conclusion [122-125] 5. Pope’s intentions are benevolent and peaceful [126-131] 5.1. Restoration of peace [128-130] 5.2. Obedience to the Holy See [131-135] 6. Conclusion [136] 7 8 I. INTRODUCTION 9 1. Context1 In his capacity as guardian of Ladislaus Posthumous, Duke of Austria and King of Hungary and Bohemia, Emperor Friederich III of Habsburg had by 1452 ruled Ladislaus’ Austrian lands for more than a decade. Growing dissatisfaction with his rule led to an Austrian rebellion with the aim of freeing Ladislaus from the emperor’s guardianship and transferring the rule of Ladislaus’ territories from Friedrich to a government based in Vienna. After the emperor´s return from his coronation voyage to Italy, the rebellion developed into a full-fledged war ending in a victory for the Austrians – despite papal intervention in favour of the emperor. The emperor’s guardianship over Ladislaus was terminated, Ladislaus came to Vienna, and a government was established in his name. A conference was called to settle a number of questions still outstanding, in Vienna in December 1452. Bishop Piccolomini participated in a double capacity as principal envoy of the emperor2 and legate of the Pope. At the conference, he intended to give the oration “Sentio”, in defense both of the emperor’s government of Austria and of the pope’s intervention on behalf of the emperor.3 4 It appears, however, that he was not able to deliver the oration as intended.5 Piccolomini himself, in his Historia Austrialis, mentions that a public meeting where he would give his speech was actually denied the imperial representatives by the leader of the conference, Margrave Albrecht of Brandenburg.