UK Gov't (Finally) Admits Covid Statistics Are Inaccurate – Offguardian
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian Jul 17, 2020 479 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate The health secretary has apparently just realised something that’s been obvious to many of us for months Kit Knightly https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 1/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian he UK’s Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, has announced an “urgent review” of procedure for recording Covid19 deaths. It turns out the British government may have been over- T reporting deaths from Covid19. Who knew, right? is follows the “news” that Public Health England (PHE) have been recording Covid19 as the cause of death for anyone who has ever tested positive for the virus. PHE released a statement admitting as much: is potentially includes people who were asymptomatic, people who had the disease and then recovered and people who never had the disease https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 2/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian at all but received a false positive from the incredibly unreliable PCR tests. In short, as one government insider is quoted in the Evening Standard: It turns out you could have been tested positive in “ February, recovered, then hit by a bus in July and you’d be recorded as a covid death.” Of course, none of this is news for people who have been paying attention – OfG and many others have been reporting this could be happening for months. Essentially, when the changed rules for registering deaths were passed with the Coronavirus Bill back in March, the over-reporting of Covid deaths became almost inevitable. Indeed, the situation could almost have been designed for that purpose. Since then anecdotal evidence has also been piling up. It’s not unique to England either, countries all around the world are doing the same. Globally, as we have reported, the Covid19 statistics are wide open to mistaken or dishonest reporting, and potentially total nonsense. https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 3/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian So, the question really isn’t whether or not the Covid death statistics are massively inaccurate – we know they almost certainly are. e question is why the government and mainstream media have suddenly decided to admit it. Or half admit it, anyway. ere’s still no discussion of the “clinical diagnosis” of “likely” covid19, or of the “unlawful” DNRs being forced on elderly or vulnerable people – all of whom would potentially be included in the inaccurate Covid stats. Or of the potential nancial incentives for hospitals based on diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Now that the government are admitting, and the media are reporting, that the Covid death statistics are inaccurate, will they start to investigate why conditions for this were seemingly deliberately created? I wouldn’t hold your breath. In a way, this perfectly ts with the peculiar trend of this pandemic, where on the one hand government ocials have been perfectly open and honest about the danger – underlining, again and again, that the vast majority of people are in no danger – whilst on the other hand stoking hysteria and public panic that is totally at odds with the admitted reality. Is this the beginning of a roll-back or climb down? Or just another phase in the global gaslighting that the coronavirus “pandemic” has become? https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 4/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian FILED UNDER: CORONAVIRUS, FEATURED, LATEST, UK TAGGED WITH: CORONAVIRUS, COVID19, MATT HANCOCK, NHS, UK can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated. Our Bitcoin JTR code is: 1JR1whUa3G24wXpDyqMKpieckMGGW2u2VX 4.8 Article Rating Subscribe Connect with Join the discussion 479 COMMENTS newest https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 5/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian Frankly Speaking Jul 21, 2020 9:40 PM Unfortunately OfG has resorted to censorship. Not only is that poor form, it’s especially hypocritical given that they’re cancelling a supporter of theirs, whilst allowing those damaging their reputation to continue unabated: From Twitter, and also posted here but memory holed this morning, probtby Admin 1…. “I’ve been supporting you for a few years but I’m saddened that in recent months you’ve allowed your ne site to be hijacked by comments from nutjobs. Also despite my warnings about alleged disinfo agents like Flaxgirl who bring your site into disrepute and thereby get it blocked or taken down. I hope this block by Twitter is lited because it’s important that people see your good reporting. For my care about you I got constantly moderated by you, whilst those that don’t give a crap about your site or its reputation and harm it are given a free pass in the name of “free speech”. Good luck. 0 -1 Reply Sophie - Admin1 Jul 22, 2020 2:07 PM Reply to Frankly Speaking Admin You are absolutely NOT being censored, but someone called “bollox” (or similar) was put on pre-mods, as per our comment policy, for persistent trolling and empty abuse. Was that you using a THIRD name? If so, I’m afraid you are trolling. We note also that, with perfect doublethink, you simultaneously complain (unjustiably) of being moderated AND complain that we don’t moderate enough. Are you seriously suggesting Twitter and Google are censoring us because we let Petra post BTL? 藍 3 0 Reply Edwige Jul 21, 2020 2:43 PM https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 6/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian The Fraudian gets around to publishing what is efectively a rebuttal: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/21/analysis-why-englands-covid-19-death- toll-is-wrong-but-not-by-much Five minutes’ thought revealed the following problems with what they laughably tag as “Analysis”: 1) The example of someone being hit by a bus being registered as a Covid death is dismissed as rare. No shit, Sherlock. The serious point behind what is obvious to anyone as a rhetorical example designed to illustrate an absurdity is simply ignored. Less rare and repeatedly evidence examples like patients with advanced cancers being registered as Covid deaths if they test positive but show no symptoms aren’t of course mentioned. 2) The accuracy of the PHE stats is considered entirely by comparison with ONS stats. The possibility that the latter may also be highly inaccurate is clearly inadmissable. 3) Comparability with how deaths were recorded in the past is simply ignored. How does this outbreak compare with the lu of 2014/15 when 28k were ocially registered as dying from it in the UK? How were deaths recorded then as compared to now – and can the two sets of gured be meaningfully compared? Who cares! (Obviously what I’m getting at is that I suspect if we could compare like with like we’d nd this has been nothing more than a typical bad lu season – but that they must obfuscate at all costs). 4) They try to bore you to death with some trivial distraction about the timing at which deaths are recorded hoping that the reader has lapsed into such an alpha state they won’t notice how pitiful their analysis is of the central issue. 5) No doubt there are other problems that someone clever than me might spot. Fraudian conclusion: nothing to see here, move on. What a surprise. It took three of their writers to come up with this BTW. 5 0 Reply Eric McCoo Jul 21, 2020 7:01 AM Great article, thanks. 2 0 Reply https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/17/uk-govt-finally-admits-covid-statistics-are-inaccurate/ 7/111 11/30/2020 UK gov’t (finally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate – OffGuardian Andy B Jul 20, 2020 11:34 PM ‘UK gov’t (nally) admits Covid statistics are inaccurate in ENGLAND’ – because facts should be sacred. 1 0 Reply Nick Kollelrlstrom Jul 19, 2020 10:10 PM my new book ‘The Great British Coronavirus Hoax, a sceptics guide’ is available on amazon.co.uk. 120 pages. 7 0 Reply Ruby Ellis Jul 20, 2020 1:47 AM Reply to Nick Kollelrlstrom Nick Kollelrlstrom, Amazon has already banned your book “The Great British Coronavirus Hoax, a Sceptics Guide” today 7/19/2020 on the rst day it was available for sale. We do not have free speech when companies can decide what we can or cannot say. 5 0 Reply John Ervin Jul 20, 2020 8:34 PM Reply to Ruby Ellis The complete page for this book is up at Amazon.com but listed “out of stock” with waiting for more. 0 0 Reply Ælfræd Jul 20, 2020 9:24 AM Reply to Nick Kollelrlstrom Nick. when are you and Richard D Hall going to do something in depth on it.