The CIA Used Feminism to Destabilize Society

Feminism AKA Mind Control The CIA Used Feminism To Destabilize Society

In the 1960´s, the elite media invented second-wave feminism as part of the elite agenda to dismantle civilization and create a New World Order."

Since writing these words last week, I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.

Steinem has tried to suppress this information, unearthed in the 1970´s by a radical feminist group called "Red Stockings." In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA- connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in "Feminist Revolution." Nevertheless the story appeared in the "Village Voice" on May 21, 1979.

Steinem has always pretended that she had been a student radical. "When I was in college, it was the McCarthy era," she told Susan Mitchell in 1997, "and that made me a Marxist." (Icons, Saints and Divas: Intimate Conversations with Women who Changed the World 1997. p 130) Her bio-blurb in June 1973 MS. Magazine states: "Gloria Steinem has been a freelance writer all her professional life. Ms magazine is her first full-time salaried job."

Not true. Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan´s alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a "Chester Bowles Student Fellowship" to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it.

In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service." This was part of Meyer´s "Congress for Cultural Freedom," which created magazines like "Encounter" and "Partisan Review" to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.

One of Steinem´s CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960´s, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for women´s lib. In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, he hired her as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine´s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy´s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the crème of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA.

Steinem´s personal relationships also belie her anti establishment pretensions. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, credited with stalling FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In the 1980´s, she dated Henry Kissinger. For more details, see San Francisco researcher Dave Emory.

Our main misconception about the CIA is that it serves US interests. In fact, it has always been the instrument of a dynastic international banking and oil elite (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) coordinated by the Royal Institute for Internal Affairs in London and their US branch, the Council for Foreign Relations. It was established and peopled by blue bloods from the New York banking establishment and graduates of Yale University´s secret pagan "Skull and Bones" society. Our current President, his father and grandfather fit this profile.

The agenda of this international cabal is to degrade the institutions and values of the United States in order to integrate it into a global state that it will direct through the United Nations. In its 1947 Founding Charter, the CIA is prohibited from engaging in domestic activities. However this has never stopped it from waging a psychological war on the American people. The domestic counterpart of the "Congress for Cultural Freedom" was the "American Committee for Cultural Freedom." Using foundations as conduits, the CIA controlled intellectual discourse in the 1950´s and 1960´s, and I believe continues to do so today. In The The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, Francis Stonor Saunders estimates that a thousand books were produced under the imprint of a variety of commercial and university presses, with covert subsidies.

The CIA´s "Project Mockingbird" involved the direct infiltration of the corporate media, a process that often included direct takeover of major news outlets. "By the early 1950´s," writes Deborah Davis, in her book Katharine the Great : Katharine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire, the CIA owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all." In 1982 the CIA admitted that reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to agents in the field. Philip Graham, publisher of the Washington Post, who ran the operation until his "suicide" in 1963, boasted that "you could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple of hundred dollars a month."

I was born in 1949. Idealists in my parent´s generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a shill for a brutal despotism. My own generation may discover that our best instincts have also been manipulated and exploited. There is evidence that the 60´s drug counter culture, the civil rights movement, and anti-war movement, like feminism, were CIA directed. For example, the CIA has admitted setting up the National Student Association as a front in 1947. In the early 1950´s the NSA opposed the attempts of the House Un American Activities Committee to root out Communist spies. According to Phil Agee Jr., NSA officers participated in the activities of SNCC, the militant civil rights group, and Students for a Democratic Society, a radical peace group.

According to Mark Riebling, the CIA also may have used Timothy Leary. Certainly the agency distributed LSD to Leary and other opinion makers in the 1960s. Leary made a generation of Americans turn away from active participation in society and seek fulfillment "within." In another example of the CIA´s use of drugs to interfere in domestic politics, Gary Webb describes how in the 1980´s, the CIA flooded Black ghettos with cocaine.

I won´t attempt to analyze the CIA´s motivation except to suggest what these acts have in common: They demoralized, alienated and divided Americans. The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world. Thus, we don´t realize who the real enemy is. For the same reason, the CIA and elite foundations also fund the diversity and multi cultural movements.

Feminism has done the most damage. There is no more fundamental yet delicate relationship in society than male and female. On it depends the family, the red blood cell of society. Nobody with the interests of society at heart would try to divide men and women. Yet the lie that men have exploited women has become the official orthodoxy.

Man loves woman. His first instinct is to nurture ("husband") and see her thrive. When a woman is happy, she is beautiful. Sure, some men are abusive. But the vast majority have supported and guided their families for millennium.

Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female characteristics, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere "stereotypes." This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. Lesbians like Rosie O´Donnell are advanced as role models.

All of this is calculated to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) The American woman has been hoodwinked into investing herself in a mundane career instead of the timeless love of her husband and children. Many women have become temperamentally unfit to be wives and mothers. People, who are isolated and alone, stunted and love-starved, are easy to fool and manipulate. Without the healthy influence of two loving parents, so are their children.

Feminism is a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by its governing elite. It is designed to weaken the American social and cultural fabric in order to introduce a friendly fascist New World Order. Its advocates are sanctimonious charlatans who have grown rich and powerful from it. They include a whole class of liars and moral cripples who work for the elite in various capacities: government, education and the media. These imposters ought to be exposed and ridiculed.

Women´s oppression is a lie. Sex roles were never as rigid as feminists would have us believe. My mother had a successful business in the 1950´s importing watch straps from Switzerland. When my father´s income increased, she was content to quit and concentrate on the children. Women were free to pursue careers if they wanted to. The difference was that their role as wife and mother was understood, and socially validated, as it should be.

Until Gloria Steinem and the CIA came along.

BLACK FEMINISM, THE CIA AND GLORIA STEINEM.

What follows is a fact sheet about Gloria Steinem’s operations against the various social and political movements in America, particularly her role in creating a hateful and virulent strain of Black feminism that attacks Black men while partnering with the white establishment.

Gloria Steinem first came across the radar of Black men in 1978 when Steinem put a book called “Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman” on the cover of Ms. Magazine, the magazine which she controlled. The book was “written” by a Black “feminist” and “activist” named Micele Wallace who came out of nowhere. Wallace was in her early twenties at the time, yet she was being touted as the “leader” of Black feminism. In the book, Wallace called abolitionists like Harriet Tubman and Sojouner Truth “ugly” and “stupid” for supporting Black men. She called Black Revolutionaries “chauvinist macho pigs” and advised Black women to “go it alone.” Gloria Steinem said that Wallace’s book would “define the future of Black relationships” and she pushed hard to make sure the book received massive publicity. Gloria Steinem’s work triggered a flood of “Hate Black Men” books and films that continues to this day. Needless to say, some were quite suspicious of Ms. Magazine and Gloria Steinem. Why was Steinem sticking her nose into the affairs of the Black community? So people started doing some research on Steinem. When it came out that Gloria Steinem was probably the ghost writer of the book with Michele Wallace’s name on it, Wallace had a nervous breakdown and went into hiding for two years. However, the damage was already done and the “Hate Black Men” movement was off and running. But the research into Gloria Steinem’s background continued. What follows is the findings of many different researchers.

BOTTOM LINE: The so-called “Black Feminist” movement was created and manipulated by the CIA from the very beginning. The only difference between Black Revolutionaries and Black Feminist on this issue is that the Black Revolutionaries KNOW they were infiltrated and manipulated—But Black Feminist are still unwilling to admit that they were infiltrated and manipulated, largely because they are highly invested in the hateful brand of Black feminism. As a result, the “Hate Black Men” movement has become MORE THAN just a political point a view: It is now a central part of the CULTURE of Black women and this fact has led to the destruction of the Black Revolution and the complete distortion of Black relationships. And the CIA had a direct hand in creating this situation.

The FACTS surrounding Gloria Steinem’s CIA operations follow:

FACT: Gloria Steinem is a CIA Agent and everything she has ever done throughout her adult life has been under the direction of the CIA.

FACT: Gloria Steinem was recruited into the CIA before she even graduated high school.

FACT: Gloria Steinem, who was from a poor and dysfunctional family and lived in a house without running water, was able to attend the elite and expensive Smith College. After she graduated she spent two years in India spying for the CIA. She received a “Chester Bowles Student Fellowship” to “study” in India. This was a Fellowship created by the CIA to cover Steinem’s expenses in India—no one has received a “Cheater Bowles Student Fellowship” either before or since Steinem received one.

FACT: One of Gloria Steinem’s first missions for the CIA was to manipulate the student movement (most people are STILL unaware that the National Student Association was created, funded and manipulated by the CIA). Steinem did this by organizing “student festivals” in Europe in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Steinem used the “student festivals” to spy on students for the CIA and she likely used the festivals to recruit new agents for the CIA. A second and more successful mission was to shift the orientation of the “woman’s movement” and splinter the Black Revolution of the 1960’s.

FACT: In 1958, Cord Meyer, head of the CIA’s International Organizations division (IO), had a plan. The Agency would provide discreet funding to an “informal group of activists” who would constitute themselves as an alternative American delegation to the festival. The CIA would not only pay their way but also assist them to distribute books and publish a newspaper in Vienna. Among other individuals, Meyer and his colleagues hired Gloria Steinem to work with them. Steinem had recently returned from a two-year stint in India.

FACT: In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA’s Cord Meyers to direct the “informal group of activists” now called the “Independent Research Service.” This was part of Meyer’s “Congress for Cultural Freedom,” which created magazines like “Encounter” and “Partisan Review” to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. It was this operation that Steinem’s “student festivals” was a part of. Besides spying on students, Steinem also acted as an agent provocateur, helping to provoke riots.

FACT: Commenting on the CIA-controlled “student festivals” organized by Gloria Steinem, Sheila Tobias, an unwitting participant on one such trip (who later taught women’s studies at Cornell University), said the CIA: “was interested in spying on the American delegates to find out who in the United States was a Trotskyite or Communist. So we were a front, as it turned out.” (quoted by Marcia Cohen in the Sisterhood, 1988)

FACT: Further information of Steinem’s CIA operations: Working through C.D. Jackson and Cord Meyer, Steinem set up an organization in Cambridge, Massachusetts called the Independent Service for Information on the Vienna Youth Festival. She obtained tax-exempt status, and Jackson helped her raise contributions from various American corporations, including the American Express Company (a documented CIA money laundering operation). But most of the money came from the CIA, to be managed by Jackson in a “special account.” The entire operation cost in the range of $85,000, a considerable amount in those years.

FACT: Gloria Steinem was considered a CIA “whiz kid.” A CIA Operative named Samuel Walker, who made a career out of publishing and became president of Walker & Co. (a New York City publishing firm founded in the same year as the CIA funded Publications Development Corporation) worked well with Steinem.

Walker evaluated Gloria Steinem’s contribution to the CIA operations thusly:

“Gloria’s group continues to do yeoman service, distributing books etc. to the point where the cry has gone up ‘Never before have so many Young Republicans distributed so much Socialist literature with such zeal.’” Walker praised Steinem’s “female intuition” and wrote, “Gloria is all you said she was, and then some. She is operating on 16 synchronized cylinders and has charmed the natives....” (C.D. Jackson to Cord Meyer, 7/14/59, with attached Walker diary; Walker to Jackson, 7/31/59, DDE.) In other words, Gloria Steinem was NOT a naive dupe of the CIA, she was a highly motivated agent who took her own initiative to move against fellow students for the CIA.

FACT: Gloria Steinem’s name keeps showing up in projects associated with CIA operations. For example (From Kai Bird’s “The Chairman: John J. McCloy and the Making of the American Establishment”, New York: Simon & Schuster, 199: pp. 483- 84, 727): In the summer of 1959, just before McCloy took his family for an extended trip to Europe, C.D. Jackson wrote to remind McCloy that later that summer a World Youth Festival was scheduled to take place in Vienna. Jackson asked McCloy to contribute a propaganda article. The piece would appear in a daily newspaper to be published in Vienna in conjunction with the festival. McCloy agreed, and the article was published (in five languages) in a newspaper distributed by a twenty-five-year- old Smith graduate named Gloria Steinem.

**This is a “student” publication: How was it published in five languages? Well the CIA did it, of course!!

FACT: When this covert operation was revealed by Ramparts magazine in 1967, Steinem told The New York Times that she approved the Agency’s role. “I was happy to find some liberals in government in those days who were far-sighted and cared enough to get Americans of all political views to the Festival.” Steinem’s definition of a “liberal” then included such young men as Zbigniew Brzezinski, an assistant professor at Harvard. Steinem arranged to fund Brzezinski’s visit to the “student festival.” Brzezinki would later become the National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) and he was the man who invented the so-called “Bear Trap” which suckered the Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan. Brzezinski was also the man who first organized and funded Osama Bin Laden’s “Jihad” against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Gloria Steinem also identified and targeted Alice Walker in the early 1960’s. She befriended Alice Walker and paid for Alice Walker to come to the CIA-manipulated “student festival” in Vienna. Alice Walker would later become the foremost writer of anti-Black male hate books— all of which were funded by money funneled to her publishers by the CIA.

FACT: Steinem has boasted in interviews with the NY Times and the Washington Post (in 1967) that her training with the CIA was “good journalistic training” because the CIA “taught you to be accurate.” This statement proves that Steinem was happy to collect money working for the CIA.

FACT: Gloria Steinem worked with Carlos Bringier, the anti-castro Cuban who staged the famous WDSU interview with Lee Harvey Oswald.

FACT: Gloria Steinem dated J. Stanley Pottinger for nine years. Pottinger was in charge of sabotaging civil rights enforcement at the Justice Department (he was assistant attorney general) under President Nixon and President Ford. According to Donald Freed & Fred Landis in their book “Death in Washington”, J Stanly Pottinger also helped to cover up the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Orlando Letelier. Pottinger also publicly defended Gloria Steinem against charges of CIA involvement—which Steinem had already admitted. Why would a “radical feminist” like Gloria Steinem be anywhere near a guy like Pottinger, unless she was a government employee herself?

FACT: Gloria Steinem dated Henry Kissinger—a international war criminal, establishment technocrat, and a long time CIA operative—for years. Why would a “radical feminist” date someone who was considered a mass murderer by EVERYONE in the movement? You be the judge.

FACT: One of the principle stockholders in Gloria Steinem’s Ms. Magazine was Catherine Graham. In the book “Catherine The Great” by Deborah Davis, the longstanding involvement of Graham publishing empire (which includes The Washington Post and Newsweek) with the CIA was documented hat considerable length.

FACT: Gloria Steinem has lied often about her career and where she gets her money. For example: she received money to start Ms. Magazine from the right-wing millionaire publisher (he publishes the racist New York Daily News) and real estate magnate Mortimer Zuckerman. Steinem lied to Vanity Fair, claiming that Zuckerman’s provided no money for Ms. Magazine. But columnist Liz Smith revealed that Zuckerman had put $1.2 million into Ms. Magazine and sent his executives to help as well. Why did Steinem lie about this? Because her funding by racists, right wingers, and CIA agents would damage her “feminist credentials.” And there has NEVER been an adequate explanation of the original funding for Ms. Magazine nor for the rapid acceptance of feminist propaganda by the mass media in the early Seventies. No radical movement has ever spread with the speed of feminism, which went from little or no organization and acceptance to total domination in less than two years. Obviously, it did touch very deep frustrations in American women, but it is difficult to avoid the fact that the existing movement was manipulated very effectively to channel these frustrations to the benefit of the business community and the detriment of women, children, families and especially Black men.

FACT: Gloria Steinem’s fake literary career was conceived and executed by the CIA’s “Matrix Operatives.” One of Steinem’s CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960’s, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for the CIA-manipulated “Feminist Movement.” In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, Felker hired Steinem as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications (a known CIA front) put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine’s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy’s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the cream of corporate America. It published ads for ITT (a CIA-supported corporation which helped engineer “Operation Chaos” in Chile which led to the CIA overthrow of a democratically elected government).

FACT: When N.Y. Times reporters confronted Steinem with documentation of her connections to the CIA and CIA funding of her various activities, Steinem remarked that she got caught because CIA wasn’t tricky enough. Hinting that CIA should have made better use of front companies, Steinem remarked:

“The CIA’s big mistake was not supplanting itself with private funds fast enough.” By the time Steinem founded Ms. Magazine, the CIA had learned how to funnel money through private individuals and corporations. That’s how Steinem was able to fund Ms. Magazine. Her CIA funding was so substantial, that Steinem was able to do the unprecedented: She stopped accepting advertising for Ms. Magazine. She didn’t need any more advertising: Because CIA money has been keeping her expensively produced magazine afloat from the very beginning.

FACT: Gloria Steinem had the (CIA) power to successfully censor three different publications (the book “The Feminist Revolution,” a “Village Voice” article, and a New York community newspaper article). All three’ publications documented Steinem’s involvement with the CIA. Nevertheless a story about Steinem’s CIA connections appeared in the “Village Voice” on May 21, 1979.

FACT: An organization of radical white feminists called “Red Stockings” outed Gloria Steinem as a CIA agent. When Red Stockings tried to publish a book called “Feminist Revolution” in 1979 with a chapter that detailed Steinem’s CIA connections, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends forced Random House to delete the chapter on Steinem. Nevertheless the chapter on Steinem’s CIA connections appeared in the “Village Voice” on May 21, 1979, but only after the “Village Voice” had been threatened by Steinem’s lawyers. The book “Feminist Revolution” is still available. You can buy the censored version from Redstockings for $8.00. For $4.00 (or free if you buy “Feminist Revolution”), you get the censored section which contains detailed material on Steinem’s early work with the CIA, and an account of how this story was censored after originally being scheduled for publication. Who were the powerful people who put pressure on Random House, the “Village Voice” and Red Stockings on Steinem’s behalf? Catherine Graham, publisher of the Washington Post (Graham is a known CIA agent—see the book “Catherine the Great” by Deborah Davis), Franklyn (uncle) Thomas of the Ford Foundation (The Ford Foundation is a documented funnel for CIA funds), and Warner Communications (a Ms. Magazine stock holder and CIA propaganda company)

FACT: Since the middle of World War II, the U.S. intelligence establishment has spent billions of dollars researching mind control techniques and inventing mind control technology. Thousands of people were kidnapped, drugged, hypnotized and tortured as a part of the CIA’s mind control research and field testing. Many of these victims began surfacing in the 1980’s.

These victims were having strange dreams and flashbacks. This was dangerous for the CIA because their mind control operations could be exposed. So the CIA created, funded and controlled a number of organizations that floated the idea that these victims were suffering from strange dreams and flashbacks BECAUSE THEY HAD BEEN SEXUALLY ABUSED BY THEIR PARENTS AS CHILDREN AND HAD REPRESSED THOSE MEMORIES. This would become the perfect way of mis-directing the search for who really victimized these people. Strangely enough, Gloria Steinem teamed up with Ted Gunderson to forment the “Satanic child abuse” hysteria as a way to help cover-up the CIA’s mind control experiments on human beings. [Gunderson once bragged about being one of the top FBI COINTELPRO supervisors during the wipe out of the Black Panther Party in the ‘60s and ‘70s.] For the inside story on Steinem’s operations with Gunderson read “Satan’s Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern Witch Hunt” by Debbie Nathan and Michael Snedeker (1995).

FACT: In 1975 Gloria Steinem two important feminist leaders, Carol Hanisch and Kathie Sarachild, again accused Steinem of working for the CIA and directing the movement toward moderation and capitulation. Steinem ignored the accusations, hoping they would go away, but then noted feminist Betty Friedan implied that “a paralysis of leadership” in the movement “could be due to the CIA” and she demanded that Steinem respond. After three months, Steinem wrote a six- page letter to feminist publications describing her work with the CIA. “I naively thought then that the ultimate money source didn’t matter” wrote Steinem, aiming to dispel the charge that she was a government operative. However, the government WAS INDEED keeping tabs on the feminist movement through female informants paid by the FBI and CIA and Steinem was a part of that. See “THE WORLD SPLIT OPEN: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America” By Ruth Rosen.

FACT: Here’s a list of how the kind of feminism advocated by Gloria Steinem has actually BENEFITED the business community when it pushed women into the work place:

• Women work for less (and Black women work for A LOT LESS). • Women are more docile and less likely to deviate from company policies (and Black women are the most docile workers of all). • Women are less likely to join labor unions. • By increasing the size of the labor pool, women created more competition for jobs thus reducing wages. • More female workers means more pussy for the boss (Black female executives are notorious for being “passed around” among white executives—mainly because their low self-esteem makes them think that such “attention” is a compliment. Do you know any white male executives? Talk to them when you get a chance. They use the term “instant pussy” when referring to the Black female executives in their companies.). • In two-income families, one person is more likely to work part-time or as a temporary, such workers get paid less and they don’t get benefits. • Taking children away from their mothers at an early age tends to increase their anxiety levels and results in higher rates of tension-relieving consumption as they grow up (and Black folks have become SUPER consumers, especially Black women). • The loss of women’s household services increases purchases of various forms of fatty fast foods, which have higher profit levels than home-cooked meals (this has particularly affected Black women: their blubber index has skyrocketed).

For a photograph of Gloria Steinem and some of the people she suckered, go to the Internet address below (You will also see a report by one of Steinem’s organizations which proves that Steinem was spying on people for the CIA): eminism is a top down social movement controlled by the political class which is exploited to promote cultural marxism, confuse gender roles, denigrate men and mislead women – all while completely ignoring genuine women’s rights issues. Here are ten ways in which true feminism is under attack. 1) Feminism Was Hijacked by the Political Class to Exploit Women When the average person thinks of feminism, they don’t differentiate between first wave feminism and second wave feminism. First wave feminism was primarily centered around giving women the right to vote and the right to own property. No one would argue with first wave feminism being a noble cause. However, second wave feminism was quickly hijacked the the elite as a tool for social engineering and has little to do with women’s rights. A quote often attributed to Adolf Hitler is, “First you get the women, then you’ve got the children, so follow the men.” By hijacking feminism and making it about subjugating men, the establishment succeeded to a great extent in making women more dependent on the state. As the late Aaron Russo revealed, the women’s liberation movement was also hijacked by the elite as a method of revenue generation. Russo was told directly by Nick Rockefeller that the Rockefellers bankrolled feminism not because they had any interest in women’s rights but because it meant that by getting more women in employment quicker, the state could collect more tax dollars. Rockefeller also told Russo that this served the dual purpose of getting children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the guardian, breaking up the traditional family model. 2) The CIA Played a Key Role in Hijacking Feminism The Central Intelligence Agency played a key role in hijacking second wave feminism via the work of Gloria Steinem, who is still a noted feminist icon today. Steinem admitted that she was recruited by the CIA to infiltrate youth counter-culture movements in the late 1950’s, and subsequently emerged as a leading icon of second wave feminism in the 1960’s. Steinem subsequently received funding from the CIA and the Rockefeller foundation to set up Ms. Magazine, a feminist publication. The CIA’s role in steering and managing second wave feminism again underscores the fact that feminism is not a grass roots “people” movement, it is a top down system of control used to divide and conquer and is run by powerful individuals who care little for actual women’s rights. 3) Cultural Marxism: Divide and Conquer Second wave feminism serves to advance cultural marxism, which posits that culture and language, not the state, is responsible for oppressing women. This is why the establishment constantly promotes second wave feminism, because by blaming contrived women’s rights issues on language, culture and patriarchy, the state absolves itself of blame. By characterizing complete non-issues, such as the recent “ban bossy” campaign, as critical feminist causes, the state distracts from real women’s rights abuses, such as those committed by the governments of US allies around the world. Cultural marxism also impugns patriarchy and the middle class as being the source of oppression, thereby enflaming class and gender wars and allowing the state to engage in divide and conquer. While people of different races and genders are trained to pick fights with each other, they are prevented from uniting against their common enemy and the only entity that can truly inflict genuine oppression – the state. 4) Mainstream Feminism Ignores Real Women’s Rights Issues Mainstream feminism serves to deflect attention away from countries where genuine women’s rights abuses and atrocities against women are taking place, by advancing meaningless causes that have nothing to do with women’s rights and everything to do with social engineering. A recent example is the “ban bossy” campaign, which is being funded by some of the largest western banks, oil companies and PR firms on the planet. While celebrity feminists such as Beyonce were recruited as part of lucrative public relations campaign to ban a word, the Iraqi parliament waspreparing to pass a new law that would legalize rape, prohibit women leaving home without the permission of their husband, and legalize marriage for 9-year-old girls. There was no multi-million dollar feminist media blitz to bring light to this desperate situation, nor did Beyonce appear in any PSAs to put pressure on the government of Saudi Arabia over their characterization of female drivers as potential terrorists. By misdirecting money and attention into causes that only serve to restrict free speech, establishment feminism sidelines real women’s rights issues. 5) Feminists Ignore the Plight of Muslim Women Fearing being labeled racist, politically correct left-wing feminists will rarely if ever campaign against some of the most egregious human rights abuses committed against women in the Muslim world. This again underscores the fact that mainstream feminism is not what it purports to be. While there are innumerable examples of women being persecuted in the Muslim world, from their characterization as terrorists simply for driving in Saudi Arabia, to genital mutilation in African countries, to stonings in places like Afghanistan, establishment feminists are too busy pursuing inane and offbeat causes such as Wikipedia being too “masculine” in order to focus on actual examples of oppression. While western feminists continue to contrive pointless arguments about “sexism” in western culture that are almost half a century out of date, the feminist movement is virtually AWOL when it comes to voicing fierce criticism of Muslim societies whose treatment of women is at least 200 years behind acceptable modern standards. “It is a curious fact that our courageous feminists leaders, women who attack mild-mannered American men at the slightest sign of sexism, often grow oddly silent when confronted with the more fundamental abuse of women in Muslim societies,” writes Charlotte Hays, noting how feminists attack people who speak out against FGM (female genital mutilation) by scorning them at “culturally insensitive”. 6) Advertising Targets Women In the United States, women buy more than 80% of all goods and services. This is why the majority of advertising is aimed at women. Advertisers routinely hijack feminist sentiment to push products that are not even beneficial and in some cases harmful to women, such as paraben-laden cosmetic products. This can be traced right back to the very foundation of modern advertising when Edward Bernays, the “father of public relations,” was hired to sell cigarettes to women, who had previously been banned from smoking in public. By marketing Lucky Strike cigarettes as “torches of freedom” and connecting them with the suffrage movement, Bernays convinced millions of women to take up the habit, undoubtedly leading to chronic illnesses and deaths in many cases. Today’s advertising targets women by making them feel inadequate about their appearance and lifestyle. Studies have shown that just looking at an object intended to enhance beauty makes women feel worse about themselves. Advertising teaches women that the only way to combat feelings of inadequacy is to endlessly consume beauty products and clothing. This in turn objectifies women as little more than pretty things to be looked at and dissuades them from spending their time and money on far more worthy activities like self- improvement, education and creative pursuits. 7) Mainstream Feminism is About Hating & Denigrating Masculinity As dissident feminist Camille Paglia has expertly identified, mainstream feminism’s obsession with denying biological differences between men and women is to blame for many of modern society’s relationship troubles. “What you’re seeing is how a civilization commits suicide,” asserts Paglia, noting that the emancipation of masculine virtues is psychologically neutering boys and creating a toxic gender imbalance. This is part of the reason why many women now complain that it is increasingly difficult to find “real men,” in other words emotionally stable men who are comfortable in their masculinity and are not afraid to express it. Feminism has frightened an entire generation of young men into being confused about how they should behave around women lest they be labeled a misogynist. This deliberate attempt to confuse gender roles undoubtedly contributes to many relationship breakdowns and soaring divorce rates. 8) Women are Being Brainwashed that Femininity and Motherhood are Dirty Words Despite motherhood being one of the most difficult and crucial roles any woman could undertake – nurturing a child from birth and attempting to help it grow into a stable and happy individual – mainstream feminism habitually disparages women taking on traditional gender roles as somehow being a form of bondage to a patriarchal society. Women are also erroneously told that they can put having children on hold until their late 30’s or 40’s without there being a substantial risk of complications. The feminist dogma of gender as a social construction and not as an innate biological science serves to confuse gender roles, straining relationships between men and women and eroding the very foundation of society. As the Independent Women’s Forum asserts, “While environment and socialization do play a significant role in human life, a growing body of research in neuroscience, endocrinology, and psychology over the past 40 years suggests there is a biological basis for many sex differences in aptitudes and preferences. In general, males have better spatial reasoning skills; females better verbal skills. Males are greater risk takers; females are more nurturing.” 9) The Real War on Women: Plunging Fertility Rates Just as sperm counts for men are plunging worldwide, female fertility rates are showing a similar decline. America’s total fertility rate is now below the replacement rate, at 1.93 for the average woman. This figure hasn’t been above the replacement rate of 2.1 children since the early 70’s. While second wave feminism has framed women’s reproductive rights around the issue of abortion, concerns about plunging fertility rates have gone unaddressed. There are numerous health and environmental factors which are contributing to declining fertility, including genetically modified foods and vaccines. 10) Estrogen Mimickers Causing Cancer Growing concern over how estrogen mimickers pose a huge health threat to women is also another issue that mainstream feminism has failed to address. Many of the transnational corporations that bankroll feminism would be directly impacted if estrogen mimickers, found in pharmaceuticals, pesticides, cosmetic products and industrial by-products, were banned, which is a primary reason why establishment feminism sidelines the problem. Last year, researchers at Duke University linked environmental exposure to bisphenol A, a common plastic, with disruption of a gene necessary for proper functioning of nerve cells. Estrogen mimickers are causing cells to rapidly grow out of control, leading to the formation of cancerous tumors.Breast cancer amongst women is surging. “15 million years of ‘healthy life’ were lost worldwide in 2008 due to women dying early or being ill with the disease,” according to scientific studies. Conclusion The good news is that many women are losing faith in second wave feminism. Recent polls show that a minority of women – 38 per cent – consider themselves feminists, while 72 per cent of Americans as a whole do not consider themselves to be feminists. An increasing understanding of the fact that establishment feminism is a political dogma exclusively designed to achieve social engineering while ignoring real women’s rights issues has led to many former feminists renouncing their involvement in feminism, which is increasingly becoming a fringe movement that has succeeded only in discrediting itself. 1) Feminism Was Hijacked by the Political Class to Exploit Women When the average person thinks of feminism, they don’t differentiate between first wave feminism and second wave feminism. First wave feminism was primarily centered around giving women the right to vote and the right to own property. No one would argue with first wave feminism being a noble cause. However, second wave feminism was quickly hijacked the the elite as a tool for social engineering and has little to do with women’s rights. A quote often attributed to Adolf Hitler is, “First you get the women, then you’ve got the children, so follow the men.” By hijacking feminism and making it about subjugating men, the establishment succeeded to a great extent in making women more dependent on the state. As the late Aaron Russo revealed, the women’s liberation movement was also hijacked by the elite as a method of revenue generation. Russo was told directly by Nick Rockefeller that the Rockefellers bankrolled feminism not because they had any interest in women’s rights but because it meant that by getting more women in employment quicker, the state could collect more tax dollars. Rockefeller also told Russo that this served the dual purpose of getting children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the guardian, breaking up the traditional family model. 2) The CIA Played a Key Role in Hijacking Feminism The Central Intelligence Agency played a key role in hijacking second wave feminism via the work of Gloria Steinem, who is still a noted feminist icon today. Steinem admitted that she was recruited by the CIA to infiltrate youth counter-culture movements in the late 1950’s, and subsequently emerged as a leading icon of second wave feminism in the 1960’s. Steinem subsequently received funding from the CIA and the Rockefeller foundation to set up Ms. Magazine, a feminist publication. The CIA’s role in steering and managing second wave feminism again underscores the fact that feminism is not a grass roots “people” movement, it is a top down system of control used to divide and conquer and is run by powerful individuals who care little for actual women’s rights. 3) Cultural Marxism: Divide and Conquer Second wave feminism serves to advance cultural marxism, which posits that culture and language, not the state, is responsible for oppressing women. This is why the establishment constantly promotes second wave feminism, because by blaming contrived women’s rights issues on language, culture and patriarchy, the state absolves itself of blame. By characterizing complete non-issues, such as the recent “ban bossy” campaign, as critical feminist causes, the state distracts from real women’s rights abuses, such as those committed by the governments of US allies around the world. Cultural marxism also impugns patriarchy and the middle class as being the source of oppression, thereby enflaming class and gender wars and allowing the state to engage in divide and conquer. While people of different races and genders are trained to pick fights with each other, they are prevented from uniting against their common enemy and the only entity that can truly inflict genuine oppression – the state. 4) Mainstream Feminism Ignores Real Women’s Rights Issues Mainstream feminism serves to deflect attention away from countries where genuine women’s rights abuses and atrocities against women are taking place, by advancing meaningless causes that have nothing to do with women’s rights and everything to do with social engineering. A recent example is the “ban bossy” campaign, which is being funded by some of the largest western banks, oil companies and PR firms on the planet. While celebrity feminists such as Beyonce were recruited as part of lucrative public relations campaign to ban a word, the Iraqi parliament waspreparing to pass a new law that would legalize rape, prohibit women leaving home without the permission of their husband, and legalize marriage for 9-year-old girls. There was no multi-million dollar feminist media blitz to bring light to this desperate situation, nor did Beyonce appear in any PSAs to put pressure on the government of Saudi Arabia over their characterization of female drivers as potential terrorists. By misdirecting money and attention into causes that only serve to restrict free speech, establishment feminism sidelines real women’s rights issues. 5) Feminists Ignore the Plight of Muslim Women Fearing being labeled racist, politically correct left-wing feminists will rarely if ever campaign against some of the most egregious human rights abuses committed against women in the Muslim world. This again underscores the fact that mainstream feminism is not what it purports to be. While there are innumerable examples of women being persecuted in the Muslim world, from their characterization as terrorists simply for driving in Saudi Arabia, to genital mutilation in African countries, to stonings in places like Afghanistan, establishment feminists are too busy pursuing inane and offbeat causes such as Wikipedia being too “masculine” in order to focus on actual examples of oppression. While western feminists continue to contrive pointless arguments about “sexism” in western culture that are almost half a century out of date, the feminist movement is virtually AWOL when it comes to voicing fierce criticism of Muslim societies whose treatment of women is at least 200 years behind acceptable modern standards. “It is a curious fact that our courageous feminists leaders, women who attack mild-mannered American men at the slightest sign of sexism, often grow oddly silent when confronted with the more fundamental abuse of women in Muslim societies,” writes Charlotte Hays, noting how feminists attack people who speak out against FGM (female genital mutilation) by scorning them at “culturally insensitive”. 6) Advertising Targets Women In the United States, women buy more than 80% of all goods and services. This is why the majority of advertising is aimed at women. Advertisers routinely hijack feminist sentiment to push products that are not even beneficial and in some cases harmful to women, such as paraben-laden cosmetic products. This can be traced right back to the very foundation of modern advertising when Edward Bernays, the “father of public relations,” was hired to sell cigarettes to women, who had previously been banned from smoking in public. By marketing Lucky Strike cigarettes as “torches of freedom” and connecting them with the suffrage movement, Bernays convinced millions of women to take up the habit, undoubtedly leading to chronic illnesses and deaths in many cases. Today’s advertising targets women by making them feel inadequate about their appearance and lifestyle. Studies have shown that just looking at an object intended to enhance beauty makes women feel worse about themselves. Advertising teaches women that the only way to combat feelings of inadequacy is to endlessly consume beauty products and clothing. This in turn objectifies women as little more than pretty things to be looked at and dissuades them from spending their time and money on far more worthy activities like self- improvement, education and creative pursuits. 7) Mainstream Feminism is About Hating & Denigrating Masculinity As dissident feminist Camille Paglia has expertly identified, mainstream feminism’s obsession with denying biological differences between men and women is to blame for many of modern society’s relationship troubles. “What you’re seeing is how a civilization commits suicide,” asserts Paglia, noting that the emancipation of masculine virtues is psychologically neutering boys and creating a toxic gender imbalance. This is part of the reason why many women now complain that it is increasingly difficult to find “real men,” in other words emotionally stable men who are comfortable in their masculinity and are not afraid to express it. Feminism has frightened an entire generation of young men into being confused about how they should behave around women lest they be labeled a misogynist. This deliberate attempt to confuse gender roles undoubtedly contributes to many relationship breakdowns and soaring divorce rates. 8) Women are Being Brainwashed that Femininity and Motherhood are Dirty Words Despite motherhood being one of the most difficult and crucial roles any woman could undertake – nurturing a child from birth and attempting to help it grow into a stable and happy individual – mainstream feminism habitually disparages women taking on traditional gender roles as somehow being a form of bondage to a patriarchal society. Women are also erroneously told that they can put having children on hold until their late 30’s or 40’s without there being a substantial risk of complications. The feminist dogma of gender as a social construction and not as an innate biological science serves to confuse gender roles, straining relationships between men and women and eroding the very foundation of society. As the Independent Women’s Forum asserts, “While environment and socialization do play a significant role in human life, a growing body of research in neuroscience, endocrinology, and psychology over the past 40 years suggests there is a biological basis for many sex differences in aptitudes and preferences. In general, males have better spatial reasoning skills; females better verbal skills. Males are greater risk takers; females are more nurturing.” 9) The Real War on Women: Plunging Fertility Rates Just as sperm counts for men are plunging worldwide, female fertility rates are showing a similar decline. America’s total fertility rate is now below the replacement rate, at 1.93 for the average woman. This figure hasn’t been above the replacement rate of 2.1 children since the early 70’s. While second wave feminism has framed women’s reproductive rights around the issue of abortion, concerns about plunging fertility rates have gone unaddressed. There are numerous health and environmental factors which are contributing to declining fertility, including genetically modified foods and vaccines. 10) Estrogen Mimickers Causing Cancer Growing concern over how estrogen mimickers pose a huge health threat to women is also another issue that mainstream feminism has failed to address. Many of the transnational corporations that bankroll feminism would be directly impacted if estrogen mimickers, found in pharmaceuticals, pesticides, cosmetic products and industrial by-products, were banned, which is a primary reason why establishment feminism sidelines the problem. Last year, researchers at Duke University linked environmental exposure to bisphenol A, a common plastic, with disruption of a gene necessary for proper functioning of nerve cells. Estrogen mimickers are causing cells to rapidly grow out of control, leading to the formation of cancerous tumors.Breast cancer amongst women is surging. “15 million years of ‘healthy life’ were lost worldwide in 2008 due to women dying early or being ill with the disease,” according to scientific studies.

Mainstream feminism is controlled by the elite and its primary motive is to advance cultural marxism, not women's rights.

"In the 1960's, the elite media invented second- wave feminism as part of the elite agenda to dismantle civilization and create a New World Order."

Since writing these words last week, I have discovered that before becoming a feminist, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.

Steinem has tried to suppress this information unearthed in the 1970's by a radical feminist group called Red Stockings. In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in Feminist Revolution. Nevertheless the story appeared in the Village Voice on May 21, 1979.

Not true. Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional Jewish family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan's alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a "Chester Bowles Student Fellowship" to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it.

In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA's Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service." This was part of Meyer's "Congress for Cultural Freedom," which created magazines like "Encounter" and "Partisan Review" to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.

It was all toward promoting a false dialectic. The same people that are behind Communism are behind the CIA. The other Jewish leader of second wave feminism, Betty Friedan, was a member of the Communist Party.

Steinem was not a unwitting agent or dupe. She was quite aware of the fact that the CIA was pulling her strings. In The Mighty Wurlitzer, author Hugh Wilford elaborates:

"As for Steinem herself, she became witting when she began asking questions about the ISI's funding, and the undercover CIA officers explained that the Boston grandees and foundations apparently subsidizing the venture were in fact pass-throughs for secret official fund." (142)

"FREELANCER"

One of Steinem's CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960's, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for women's lib.

In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, Felker hired her as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine's first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy's Dallas motorcade route.

Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the cream of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA.

Steinem's personal relationships also belie her anti establishment pretensions. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, credited with stalling FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In the 1980's, she dated Henry Kissinger.

CIA CONTROLS INFORMATION/DISCOURSE

Using foundations as conduits, the CIA controlled intellectual discourse in the 1950's and 1960's, and continues to do so today. In "The Cultural Cold War," Francis Stonor Saunders estimates that a thousand books were produced under the imprint of a variety of commercial and university presses, with covert subsidies.

The CIA's "Project Mockingbird" involved the direct infiltration of the corporate media, a process that often included direct takeover of major news outlets. "By the early 1950's," writes Deborah Davis, in her book "Katherine the Great," the CIA owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all."

In 1982, the CIA admitted that reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to agents in the field. Philip Graham, publisher of the Washington Post, who ran the operation until his "suicide" in 1963, boasted that "you could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple of hundred dollars a month."

POLITICAL MANIPULATION

I was born in 1949. Idealists in my parent's generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a snare. My own generation may discover that our best instincts have also been manipulated and exploited. The 60's drug counter culture, the civil rights movement and anti-war movement, like feminism, were CIA directed.

For example, the CIA has admitted setting up the National Student Association as a front in 1947. In the early 1950's the NSA opposed the attempts of the House Un American Activities Committee to root out Communist spies. According to Phil Agee Jr., NSA officers participated in the activities of SNCC, the militant civil rights group, and Students for a Democratic Society, a radical peace group.

According to Mark Riebling, the CIA also may have used Timothy Leary. Certainly the agency distributed LSD to Leary and other opinion makers in the 1960s. Leary made a generation of Americans turn away from active participation in society and seek fulfillment "within." In another example of the CIA's use of drugs to interfere in domestic politics, Gary Webb describes how in the 1980's, the CIA flooded Black ghettos with cocaine.

The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world. Thus, we don't realize who the real enemy is. For the same reason, the CIA and elite foundations also fund "immigration reform" and "gay rights" movements.

FEMINISM Feminism has done the most damage. There is no more fundamental yet delicate relationship in society than male and female. On it depends the family, the red blood cell of society. Nobody with the interests of society at heart would try to divide men and women. Yet the lie that men have exploited women has become official orthodoxy.

Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female instincts, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere "social constructs" and "stereotypes." This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. Lesbians like Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen DeGeneris are advanced as role models.

(Left, Feminist leader and Illuminati Jew Gloria Steinem makes a satanic sign and celebrates killing her unborn child. "Change the world" she has, for the worse.)

Feminism is a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by its governing elite. It is designed to weaken the social and cultural fabric in order to introduce a friendly fascist New World Order. Its advocates are sanctimonious charlatans who have grown rich and powerful from it. They include a whole class of liars and moral cripples who work for the elite in various capacities: social workers, lawyers, "educators" and the media.

Women's oppression is a lie. Sex roles were never as rigid as feminists would have us believe. My mother had a successful business in the 1950's importing watch straps from Switzerland. When my father's income increased, she was content to quit and concentrate on the children. Women were free to pursue careers if they wanted to. The difference was that their role as wife and mother was understood and socially validated, as it should be.

Until Gloria Steinem and the CIA came along.

NOW MIGHT BE A GOOD TIME TO TALK ABOUT GLORIA STEINEM’S TIME AS A CIA ASSET…

By the way, the other woman in this photo is Dorothy Pitman Hughes, an amazing activist who has received neither the press nor the institutional acceptance of Steinem

Last week, 79-year-old feminist icon Gloria Steinem was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. During her acceptance speech, she graciously declared,“I’d be crazy if I didn’t understand that this was a medal for the entire women’s movement.” Should you be under the impression that this award is indicative of a tacit endorsement of feminism by either the the Obama administration or even the U.S. Government, allow me to brush you up on a little feminist history.

In 1959, Gloria Steinem attended the communist-sponsored World Youth Festival in Vienna as the head of the Independent Service for Information, a CIA front. The ISI had been set up at Harvard to send young anti-communist Americans to attend the World Youth Festival, where they could defend the US against communist critics and report back on their Marxist counterparts. Steinem was in charge of recruiting those young anti-communists.

Currently, Steinem is an honorary chair of Democratic Socialists of America (my comrades and former employers). The primary initiator of DSA, Michael Harrington (then of the Young People’s Socialist League), was also offered a free trip, but declined. Though he was a socialist, and critical of communism, Harrington refused to go unless he was also given license to criticize capitalism. Apparently Ms. Steinem felt no such moral conflict.

Before I’m dismissed as the Alex Jones of feminism, Steinem’s time with the CIA is public record. In the video below (yes, I know it’s from a conspiracy theory nut), she discusses her time as an employee. Now, I’m not accusing Gloria Steinem of being some sort of secret government fake feminist spy, but I do think it’s important to remember that we boner-killing, man-hating witches are not a united front, and we certainly aren’t all working towards the same goals. Some of us worked for the CIA for four years, others of us want to smash capitalism, and guess which ones get medals from the President?

Steinem may think she’s accepting an award “for the entire women’s movement,” but she sure as hell isn’t accepting it on my behalf.

Did the CIA Use Gloria Steinem to Subvert the Feminist Movement?

Co-opting Radical Feminism for Corporate Interests

While preeminent American feminist Gloria Steinem’s CIA background receives wide attention on the Internet, it’s a totally taboo topic in either the corporate or the so-called “alternative” media. Steinem’s work for the CIA front group Independent Research Service first entered the public domain in 1967 whenRamparts magazine exposed both the Independent Research Service and the National Student Association as CIA front organizations. Fearing unflattering publicity, Steinem gave interviews to both the New York Times and the Washington Postdefending her CIA work (see video below). In both articles, she claims to have taken the initiative in contacting Cord Meyers, who headed the CIA’s International Organization Division and their top secret Operation Mockingbird.* Her goal, allegedly, was to seek CIA financing to encourage American participation in the seventh postwar (Soviet-sponsored) World Youth Festival in Vienna in 1959. The article quotes her: “Far from being shocked by this involvement, I was happy to find some liberals in government who were farsighted and cared enough to get Americans of all political views to attend.”

Steinem served as director of the CIA-funded Independent Research Service from 1958-62. It was her responsibility to organize US students, scholars and writers to attend the yearly World Youth Festival, to observe and takes notes on foreign participants, to distribute pamphlets, flyers and books and to edit a daily propaganda newspaper.

Steinem Threatens to Sue Random House

Steinem’s CIA links came to mainstream media attention a second time in 1979, when the Village Voice ran an article about a chapter Random House had censored from Redstockings Collective’s 1979 book Feminist Revolution. Random House spiked the chapter, which describes Steinem’s earlier CIA work, after Steinem threatened to sue them. This deleted chapter (which you can get free by ordering an out-of-print copy ofFeminist Revolution from Redstockings Collective) also suggests her CIA involvement may not have ended in 1969 when she left the International Research Associates. It details the right wing corporate funding which helped Steinem inaugurate Ms Magazine, as well as the magazine’s pivotal role in transforming American feminism from a broad multi-class, multiracial movement to one devoted to divisive male bashing and advancing career opportunities for white upper middle class women. The original feminists of the sixties and seventies didn’t hate men (at least not the ones I worked with). What they hated was patriarchy and the use of male privilege to deny women and children full equality as human beings.

Operation Mockingbird in Action

In 1960 Clay Felker, a CIA-linked Independent Research Service staffer who accompanied Steinem to the Helsinki World Youth Festival in 1962, became the editor of Esquire magazine, where he published many of Steinem’s early feminist articles. In 1968 Felker started New York magazine, and in 1971 he hired Steinem as contributing editor. It was Felker who published the first edition of Ms Magazine as a New York magazine insert. As the feminist magazine Off Our Backs states in a 1975 article about the Redstockings scandal, their discovery of Steinem’s earlier CIA employment raised a host of concerns about her sudden installation (mainly by corporate media) as the official leader of the US women’s movement without any previous involvement in feminist groups or campaigns. Interestingly Ms Magazine‘s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy’s Dallas motorcade route. The Turmoil At NOW

In 1966, Steinem was still on the board of directors of International Research Service, when she co-founded National Organization for Women (NOW) with Betty Friedan, author of The Feminine Mystique. A 2001 article inThe American Prospect describes (quoting from The World Split Open by Ruth Rosen) how in 1975 prominent NOW members Carol Hanisch and Kathie Sarachild openly accused Steinem of working for the CIA and “directing the movement toward moderation and capitulation.” Ultimately Friedan herself became concerned “a paralysis of leadership” in the movement “could be due to the CIA” and demanded that Steinem respond. After three months, Steinem wrote a six-page letter to various feminist publications describing her work on two student festivals in 1959 and 1962 that were funded by the CIA. Aiming to deflect the charge she was or had been a government operative, it stated, “I naively thought then that the ultimate money source didn’t matter, since in my own experience, no control or orders came with it.”

The Off Our Backs article also raises questions about a parallel organization Steinem started (in competition with NOW – starting parallel groups is a common strategy employed by US intelligence to sabotage grassroots organizations) in 1971 called Women’s Action Alliance. Located in the same building as Ms. Despite its name, the WAA wasn’t involved in “action,” as its name suggests. It engaged mainly in information gathering. It had a $20,000 grant from Rockefeller Family Fund for the establishment of a “national clearinghouse information and referral service” on the women’s movement. WAA collected information on key women leaders and their groups and activities, presumably facilitation FBI/CIA efforts to monitor them. Steinem’s Fascination with Fascist Men Despite her so-called liberal feminist credentials, Steinem has had a clear preference for right wing men, often with CIA and/or FBI links. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, who played a prominent role in undermining civil rights enforcement under Nixon and Ford. He also obstructed FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In 1984 Pottinger was investigated for participating in Irangate, a CIA scheme to illegally smuggle arms to Iran .** In the 1980’s, Steinem dated Henry Kissinger.

The Use of Black Feminists to Sabotage Civil Rights Organizing

In the late seventies and early seventies, African American organizers became concerned about a pattern in which agents posing as black feminists infiltrated their community groups in an effort to split off women members into separate organizations. They traced this phenomenon back to 1978 when Steinem put a book called Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman on the cover of Ms Magazine. The book was allegedly “written” by a Black “feminist” and “activist” named Michele Wallace. In her early twenties Wallace, who like Steinem came out of nowhere (she was a Newsweek book review researcher), was suddenly being touted as the “leader” of Black feminism. In the book, Wallace called abolitionists like Harriet Tubman and Sojouner Truth “ugly” and “stupid” for supporting Black men. She called Black Revolutionaries “chauvinist macho pigs” and advised Black women to “go it alone.” Gloria Steinem maintained that Wallace’s book would “define the future of Black relationships” and she pushed hard to make sure the book received massive publicity. Gloria Steinem’s efforts triggered a flood of “Hate Black Men” books and films that continues to this day.

*Operation Mockingbird was a secret CIA campaign to influence the media by placing CIA assets on the staff and editorial board of major publishers and media outlets and by paying reporters a small stipend to publish articles favorable to CIA interests. It allegedly ended in 1976 but many researchers believes it continues under a different name to the present day. **Irangate was a CIA effort to illegally smuggle arms to Iran to obtain funding for the illegal CIA war against Nicaragua. feminism is a new world order plot to put a divide between the sexes and cause dissentions within society. When you examine this theory though, its major flaw is that women should have basic human rights and not be treated as second class citizens.

The gains of feminism

100 years ago women weren't allowed to vote but the suffragettes fought for this right.

50 years ago women weren't able to get a home loan in their own name, Married women weren't allowed to work.

The law allowed for rape and bashings within marriage and a wife was considered a chattel as much as a person.

Such positive advances are today taken for granted and its hard to imagine how such a backward state of affairs could have existed.

My thinking is that the new world order may have seen these changes about to happen, and to throw some shadow of doubt and to muddy the issue, they then made a show of their own version of feminism.

Henry Mackow

Henry Mackow has a website called www.savethemales.ca and claims that feminism is a nwo plot, that women love to be dominated by men and it is the natural order. He himself, decries the loss of feminine women who live to support a man and make him feel masculine. He married a philippino woman (which is on his website). And this is ok, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that feminism is an illuminati plot.

His new website is www.henrymackow.com where he continues to put his many interesting and often very informative articles. However, I think he has gotten hold of one aspect of feminism and not realised its interwovenness within the whole of society and the total way society thinks and operates.

The illuminati and feminism

A person can never be really sure what the illuminati stand is on a topic. For example, their "peace keepers" are often armies of repression. Like in the book 1984, "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength", what is promoted is often not what delivered, just a tool of deception to get the people onboard.

It seems the illuminati may have an interest in using feminism to further their agenda http://coleman300.com/WhitePaper/ The Rise of Radical Feminism: from Lenin to Clinton. Not a new movement, it is following the pattern laid down by the Fabian Socialist Beatrice Webb and adopted by Lenin and the Bolshevik leaders. A detailed account of the role of "feminists" Madame Kollontei (Bolshevik commissar), Eleanor Roosevelt, Abzug, Ireland, Holtzman, Hillary Clinton, Boxer and Feinstein.

But what is the opposite of feminism, or a matriarchal society? What we have now which is patriarchy where male values dominate. It would take a certain type of man to admit that things are a little out of balance and that in many ways women's values are under-estimated and under-represented.

Gloria Steinham

Gloria Steinham, one of the original bra burners, is said to be an an illuminati stooge -- mostly by Henry Makow.

Gloria Steinem - How The CIA Used Feminism To Destabilize Society By Henry Makow, Ph.D. 3-19-2 http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm Another Henry Mackow article saying that women and men are being divided by feminism, that women naturally desire to be guided by a man, and a man is naturally nurturing and caring towards a woman.

Speech by Gloria Steinham Speech for APNE APP - an organisation to end sex slavery http://www.apneaap.org/sites/default/files/Speech%20by%20Gloria%20Steinh am%202007_0.pdf She congratulates women in the east who have escaped slavery and prostitution to get out of it and set up their own businesses etc. Gloria is activating against cheapness of life, childhood slavery and prostitution, where life is cheaper than arms etc. Hardly the words of somebody who is working for the illuminati.

Oprah refers to Gloria Steinham as an inspiring woman http://www.oprah.com/world/After-the-Show-with-Inspiring-Women Gloria was featured on Oprah in one episode where Oprah admired Gloria's contribution to helping liberate women.

Why Feminism is a Fraud… and just uses the ‘fight for women’s rights’ as a proxy to wage war on men.

Feminism had a lot to say back in the day (before I was born I might add.) When you look at its foundational beliefs everything they push on society via government (men’s taxes) revolves about a few constants:

1. Men cannot be victims. Women cannot be perpetrators. 2. Women have been oppressed, are still oppressed and the only thing that can save them is feminism. 3. Women are exploited by patriarchal constructs like capitalism. 4. Women are equal (or superior) to men in every way.

Feminism is an ideology. Like communism. In fact, the feminists got their ideas about destroying the family, capitalism etc from Karl Marx.

“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.” – Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (First Harvard University Press, 1989), p.10

The whole ‘rising up’ of these so called empowered women or wimmin (they don’t like the word ‘women’ because it contains the word ‘men’) was only made possible by corporate sponsorship. The main benefactors were the Rockefeller banking cartel. Source. Also, corporate interests were integrated into the feminist campaigns. Tobacco companies, at the instruction of Edward Bernaise, paid women to join the women’s marches while smoking cigarettes, to associate ’empowerment’ with buying their product. Women, being easily led, fell for it of course. Source. The CIA had a big part to play in its proliferation in the media also. Source.

Why would the Rockfellers fund feminism? Well, they wanted women in the workplace. That’s another half of the population they could tax. Their children would have to go into state run schools, they could then be ‘taught’ whatever is necessary to keep them dependent on consumerism and loyal to the state. The nuclear family would take a nose dive. It had nothing to do with ’empowering women’. In fact, it did the opposite.

“Destroy the family, you destroy the country.” — V.I. Lenin

So, feminism is now rampant. Like political correctness, it actually does the opposite of what it claims to do. It claims to give women rights, but only by attacking men’s rights. Anything catering to women is seen as ’empowering, girl power’ or some other slogan, anything catering to men is sexist. Men’s clubs?Sexist! Women’s clubs? Empowering! Q.

The flavour of the day though, is ‘pay discrimination’. I have written about thisalready and so have many others. The feminist M.O. is always the same. Portray women as victims of something, blame men as oppressing women (because they’re men of course), lobby for law to change to stop it. Reality is conveniently avoided.

Feminists claim women are being discriminated against because they earn less during their lifetime. Single mothers often don’t make much money! Oh noes!

Feminism told women they can be whatever they want to be. They also told women that being in a nuclear family is oppression, heterosexual intercourse is oppression, having babies is oppression (Rockefeller also funded The Pill) indeed, as some ‘leading’ feminist write:

“We can’t destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.” — Robin Morgan (ed), Sisterhood is Powerful, 1970, p.537

“No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” — Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18

As a result of being able to do what they want, they went into the workplace. They were free to take what jobs they were qualified (and wanted) to do. Their choices reflect what their priorities are, which are different to those of men. Men generally choose jobs because of pay. Women choose jobs because of flexibility, safety and convenience. They make less money because they jobs they choose pay less. Simple isn’t it?

No it isn’t. Feminists refuse to accept that women’s choices put them in that position. So they blame the economy. The reports they release always ignore the choices of jobs, the hours taken off, the sick days called in and such. Why? Well their agenda is portraying women as victims, so they must synthesise a distorted reality to push that agenda. They pretend everything else is equal. How can they do this?

“Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go – even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity and precision on which the former depend.” — Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies, (New York Basic Books, 1994), p.116

Logic and objectivity aren’t in the feminist play book, they can’t allow them to be because it would undermine all of the lies they use to push their agenda. They are using women as a weapon to try and communise society. Consider the issue of porn/ lads mags/ dress. Feminists exclaimed that being with the same man is oppressive, women have the right to take charge of their own sexuality! To use it for themselves! (The idea behind that was to destroy relationships, the precursor to the family.) So, women were ‘freed’ from relationships. They no longer experienced the stigma of being ‘of low morality’ as Richard Blackwood used to put it. So what did these women CHOOSE to do? Why, they went into the sex industry. They used their bodies to make money. They exploited themselves for cash. They sent pictures into to NUTS and Maxim in the hope of getting a job.

Feminists didn’t like that, so they attack the industry (well, the men in it), conveniently ignoring the choices women made, and somehow blaming men for ‘forcing’ women to cue up around the block for porn auditions, FHM shoots and such. (Some of the biggest production houses in the porn industry are women, like Jenna Jameson, Jill Kelly etc, but the feminists’ reality ignores them. They must still be exploited by men, somewhere, somehow.)

They also hate the nuclear family with a passion. (Naturally, they label it oppressive, blame men for oppressing, tell women to reject the family to empower them, the same old story.)

“[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.” — Alison Jaggar, Feminist Politics and Human Nature

Feminists also assume all men are criminals, sex offenders, rapists etc. Evil barbaric creatures that should be enslaved. Men are separated from children on planes because of feminist BS. Source. Men are attacked for walking in the park with their daughters. Source. Boys are failed in feminised schools. Source. Inventing stories to demonise men. Source. and so on…

“All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French, Authoress.

In reality, there is no pay discrimination, women want to be photographed in lingerie, women like attention, women want families, women don’t want to work in high-risk jobs (95% of work related deaths are men.)

Currently, most women (and men) will defend feminism because they’re brainwashed and they don’t know any better. Women defend it because of the benefits it gives them. Men defend it because they’re trying to curry favour with women.

I don’t defend it because I’ve done the research. I hate it. Feminists can kiss my arse.

In reality, feminism is a war on men and boys, and it works by acting like it is about women. Until people reject feminism (vocally) it will continue to destroy the family, destroy populations and destroy the bonds between men and women.

And if we lose that, nothing else will matter. Except the global eugenics/ depopulation agenda.

One final thought. Although feminists portray women as equal to men, they will not hesitate to portray them as helpless victims (hence unequal, and in need of new laws) when it suits their agenda. The Feminist Movement was a CIA project of social programming No, I’m not some sexist that believes women should be bare foot and pregnant, slaving away take care of the home. I believe that all people regardless of sex, ethnicity and whatever qualifier you come up with should have equal rights, equal pay and respect and dignity given as a human being. And the feminist movement was social programming by the CIA, the Ford Foundation and other globalist organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR is a creation of John D. Rockefeller and is run by his grandson, David Rockefeller. This is all well documented. Ms. Steinem herself has admitted this, although she didn’t want the information to get out in the 1970’s. Under “Operation Mockingbird” the CIA infiltrated the US media organizations and recruited writers and broadcasters to control what we refer to as the “main stream media.” The CIA has been practicing spying on dissidents since the 1950’s in what they call COINTELPRO operations, or “Counter Intelligence Programs.” Cord Meyers of the CIA recruited Steinem into the CIA in 1958. Her job was to direct “activists” in a group called the “Independent Research Service.” The following some snips from an article published in The Village Voice on May 21, 1979. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02217.html

“Inside the CIA with Gloria Steinem” by Nancy Borman

The near-total blackout on the Steinem/Random House censorship story is reminiscent of the level of enthusiasm Redstockings encountered when they first tried to get coverage for the story of Steinem and the CIA. Their 16-page tabloid “press release” charging that Steinem had covered up a 10-year association with the CIA and that Ms. magazine, which she had founded, was endangering the women’s liberation movement struck the 1975 MORE conference like a new war coming over the wire. The hotel was abuzz and people snatched up the releases, but when it came to actually writing the story, nearly everyone bowed out. One reporter criticized the women for not obtaining Steinem’s side of the story before publishing the release.

Others skimmed the material and dismissed it as old news, which was partially true. Still others thought it was McCarthyistic both in tone and casual conclusions. In 1967 both the New York Times and the Washington Post carried interviews with Steinem in the wake of Ramparts’ expose of CIA funding of the National Student Association and other organizations. Steinem was the founder and director of one of those groups, Independent Research Service, for which she had solicited and obtained CIA money to carry out covert operations at Communist youth festivals in Vienna and Helsinki in 1959 and 1952. Unlike most of the other principals in the scandal, who had repudiated their past work with the agency and turned over information to the press, Steinem defended her secret deal with the CIA, calling the undermining of the youth festivals “the CIA’s finest hour.” There’s a lot more background in the article, but I’ll let you go to the link above and read it yourself. Basically, Gloria Steinem was part of the CIA’s “Operation Mockingbird.”

“Operation Mockingbird” This CIA operation was the infiltration of corporate media in an effort to take over major news outlets. Deborah Davis’ book, Katharine the Great : Katharine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire, shows that the CIA “owned” journalists of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other media outlets. A quote from Ms. Davis’ book. “By the early 1950´s, the CIA owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all according to a former CIA analyst.” The CIA admitted in 1982 that reporters on the CIA payroll had acted as case officers for field agents. Philip Graham, who published the Washington Post, ran the operation until his suicide in 1963. Graham has been quoted as saying, “you could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple of hundred dollars a month.” Allen Dulles of the CIA oversaw the operation. Here’s a link to an article by writer, Alex Constantine on Operation Mockingbird that gives a good overview of the project. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MOCK/mockingbird.ht Tales from the Crypt: The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird Here’s a link to an article about Operation Mockingbird. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmockingbird.htm There are numerous links in the about article on a lot of the prominent players in this project. There is ample documentation on the internet and in books making the CIA-Steinem connection and Operation Mockingbird. Do the research if you’re still skeptical about this issue. The next big question is “why.” Why would the CIA want to infiltrate the mainstream media? If you read enough about Operation Mockingbird, the original impetus was to counteract communist groups and provide propaganda that would produce loyalty to the American government. It sounds innocent enough, but it got twisted into a total control of what is supposed to be a “free press.” It hasn’t been “free” for decades. Another interesting topic to research is the CIA’s “family jewels” information released on June 26, 2007 under a Freedom of Information request. It documents the CIA’s meddling in US media and the illegal wiretapping of journalists and dissidents. Here’s a link to a site that has all the details. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB222/index.htm Another big “why” question, is why did the CIA want to infiltrate and guide the women’s liberation movement? Nicholas Rockefeller, of the powerful Rockefeller family, had befriended filmmaker Aaron Russo, during the 1990’s. According to Russo, Rockefeller had told him that the Rockefeller Foundation had helped to fund the feminist movement. There were several reasons for this. One, it got women into the work force. This provided more income for taxation. If you haven’t read it, you might want to check out the article I wrote on the income tax system, “There Is No Law Requiring Most People to File and Pay Income Tax in the US.” Second, it got kids in government funded schools at an earlier age for indoctrination. The intent was to break up the traditional family and the acceptance of the government as the primary family. Here’s an article on Russo and his memories of his relationship with Nick Rockefeller. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm Russo reveals a lot more than just the manipulation of the women’s liberation movement in this article. There are also a few videos of Aaron Russo being interviewed about his relationship with Nick Rockefeller. Here’s a link to a 15-minute clip from the interview.

Rockefeller admitted elite goal of microchipped population Here’s the expanded version of the interview, 1 hour and 9 minutes long. Fascinating stuff to say the least.

Historic Interview with Aaron Russo, Fighting Cancer and the New World Order I know all this sounds like “conspiracy nutjob central” stuff. It’s hard to accept. But Aaron Russo was no fool. He was an accomplished filmmaker and entertainment big shot. He was a true patriot. And the chip is coming. Do some research on the Real ID Act, which will require “chipped” identification cards for anyone who wants to enter federal buildings, use public transportation (flights, trains, buses, ships), have a bank account at a federally chartered bank, have an investment account with a registered investment firm, receive federal benefits (Social Security, Medicare, etc.). This is supposed to be in effect by May 2008. Several states have voted not to participate in the program. US passports are now being chipped. Several companies are requiring RFID chips for employees for “security” reasons. RFID chips are being touted on networks like CNBC as the wave of the future. There is a movement in the medical community to have people chipped so that medical records could be accessed in emergency situations. The movement is to have the chips implanted in people eventually. You can take one if you want to, but I’m not getting chipped like an animal. So believe what you will about what’s really going on behind all this. The information is out there if you’re willing to look.

Feminism, New World Order and Rockefeller's New War

In the 1960's, the elite media invented second-wave feminism as part of the elite agenda to dismantle civilization and create a "New World Order."

The ultimate aim is to concentrate the world's wealth/power in a relatively few hands through a global "socialist" dictatorship, administered by the UN, and paid for by you. As former President George Bush told the UN General Assembly in 1992, "It is the sacred principles enshrined in the UN Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance."

This is the long-term agenda of the dynastic Anglo-American international banking and oil monopolies (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) and British aristocratic families that have used foreign services and intelligence agencies to manipulate world affairs and cause havoc since the end of the 19th century. Some people call this a "conspiracy." Conspiracy is the history that isn't written.

Feminism was promoted for the purpose of de stabilizing society, and creating dysfunctional people. Stunted people can be brainwashed and manipulated. Rockefeller's new war (a.k.a. The War on Terror) is an extension of this elite agenda of world monopoly.

Feminism masquerades as a movement for women's rights. This kind of deception is typical of subversive movements of Communist origin. In reality, feminism is ruthlessly opposed to femininity, masculinity, heterosexuality, the nuclear family and children.

It deliberately promotes homosexuality which, according to experts, is a form of arrested development. Feminism neuters women, rendering them less fit to become wives and mothers. Men are emasculated, unable to create families, or make sacrifices for the sake for their children.

If feminism were genuine, it would have disappeared when discrimination against women ended. It continues as a tool of the elite agenda: depopulation, de stabilizing society, and dismantling Western Civilization.

In academia, feminists are the storm troopers of the Brave NW0, making politics supreme over science, objective fact and reason. Feminists believe western culture needs to be "reformulated" because men ("the patriarchy") created it. Essentially, this involves throwing it out.

Modern feminism is a classic Communist "popular front" subversive movement. Betty Friedan, and virtually all its leading exponents were/are Communist/ Marxist activists. Feminism has taken over the education and legal systems, the media and federal bureaucracy because dismantling our culture is the elite agenda.

The elite financed the Communists because the state is the ultimate monopoly. By controlling that, they control everything. As well, they have the common goal of destroying western civilization.

Communists use social ideals to dupe the people. In the past, Communists exploited class and race divisions to divide and conquer. Now they pretend to champion women and homosexuals. Their real aim is to de stabilize and control society.

The result of feminism is massive social and psychological dysfunction. Feminists, who would not touch a genetically modified apple, deny the inherent male-female dichotomy, the yin-yang at the heart of the universe. They are standing between millions of people and their G-d, because loving sexual union mirrors divine union.

Western civilization is Judeo Christian. Every civilization is based on religion. They are founded on the assumption that the material world mirrors an immanent spiritual order. Call it G-d.

Culture, personal and social, is the attempt to reflect this spiritual order. This is the true path to fulfillment and happiness. Civilization is a quest for G-d. There is no such thing as culture divorced from G-d.

The monopolists want to bring down western civilization because the Divine Order is opposed to the New World Order. They want to replace civilization with paganism.

If believers are accused of imposing their morality on others, they should reply, you are imposing your IMMORALITY on us.

Believers should insist on prayer and references to G-d in public institutions because while there are many religions, all lead to the same mountaintop. While we should not insist on our particular path, we should insist on the common goal. We should unite to defend civilization against the onslaught of paganism.

Sexual promiscuity and pornography are a big part of this push to paganism. They result from arrested development. The stunted human equates sex with love and obsessively fills the vacuum with sex. The elite monopolists promote this decadence and call it liberation. They are turning us into sexual misfits and nomads unable to form fruitful permanent relationships. Monopolists control the mass media, the education system and the professions. Universities and think tanks are filled with intellectual whores and moral cowards financed by tax exempt foundations. William H. McIllany's book, "The Tax-Exempt Foundations" shows how our tastes and attitudes have been formulated and controlled. For example, Rockefeller financed the development of contraception and the promotion of depopulation and promiscuity (The Kinsey Report.) Ominously, Rockefeller also financed the eugenics movement and paid for the United Nations site.

The elite media tells us that Iraq must be contained before it acquires weapons of mass destruction. It doesn't tell us that Iraq now has the second largest oil reserves in the world, and is expected to supercede even Saudi Arabia. Could the projected 300 billion barrels of Iraqi oil be of any interest to Rockefeller-Morgan- Chase-Exxon? Might it interest their minions in the CIA and Bush administration? Who will benefit from these reserves after Saddam Hussein is toppled? These questions are worth asking, don't you think?

Last week General Tommy Franks inadvertently referred to the war in Afghanistan as "Vietnam" and didn't realize his mistake. This telling slip of the tongue wasn't reported in the US. (I saw it on a cable channel from France.) The American "victory" in Afghanistan may have been spurious. The Taliban may have melted away in order to avoid bombs and draw in American ground troops.

What was reported, however, was a "leak" in which seven countries were named as potential US first-strike nuclear targets. In addition to the "axis of evil," Russia, China, Syria and Libya were named. While the administration backpedaled furiously this week, the message got out loud and clear. According to the "Tehran Times", from Iran (a country with oil reserves of 100 billion barrels): "The order indicates the US administration is going to wreak havoc on the whole world in order to establish its hegemony and domination." (National Post, March 11)

An article in the Chicago Tribune March 3, 2002, was remarkably candid for the elite media. Under a headline "Whack Iraq? Striking Hussein is Ill-Conceived," Senior Correspondent R.C. Longworth reported that emissaries from "the Eastern Establishment" recently traveled to Chicago, to win local support for an American war on Iraq.

"About 20 prominent Chicagoans gathered recently for a private dinner to hear an emissary from the Eastern Establishment lay out the administration's case for a war on Iraq. It was a conservative crowd--lawyers, business people, bankers, a sprinkling of academics, even a retired Army general. All probably supported the war in Afghanistan, and there wasn't a card-carrying dove in the lot.''

Nevertheless, the Chicago elite unanimously opposed the war-on-Saddam pitch, comparing it to similar war-hawk assurances they received before the U.S. got into the quagmire in Vietnam. The Chicagoans were not demonstrating Midwestern isolationism. On the contrary, they argued that "a unilateral attack on Iraq would shred those alliances [with Europe and the Arab world], turning the U.S. from a global leader, respected by its allies, into a global bully feared by its subjects.''

It's about time we heard from these US regional elites. Feminism, the New World Order and the Rockefeller's new war are all part of the same picture: a ruthless, insatiable drive for world resource monopoly. Inevitably this will lead to genocide and tyranny.

The American people are good, decent and courageous. It's time they attacked the root of the evil that afflicts them. We should begin by networking with like-minded citizens, and making our voices heard. Our first demand should be an independent investigation of the events of Sept. 11. Why were there no Arab names on the passenger lists? Show us that the elite didn't perpetrate this atrocity. I don't want to believe it did. But these days self-delusion is becoming a luxury. Feminism—A Communist Agenda How the Rockefellers Engineered Women

“The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young.”[1]

By David J. Stewart

Truth is stranger than fiction. The average American only knows what they were taught in a heathen public school system as a youth; and what they've learned ever since from the lying mainstream newsmedia, brainwashing movies, demonic music, and corrupt television programming. As predictable with human nature, the American people have fallen hook, line and sinker for numerous Communist agendas which have ruined our nation.

Here are the truthful words of prolific author, Dr. Henry Makow, explaining how the Rockefellers have engineered women to be feminists:

THE BIG PICTURE: THE CENTRAL BANKERS

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive.

Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Midler's movies and "America: From Freedom to Fascism" identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women's liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to "chip us." Google "Rockefeller Foundation" and "Women's Studies" and you'll get a half million citations.

The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family.

A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private world central banking cartel that also controls media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels. To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state ("world government") using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11.

The poet Charles Peguy said, "Everything begins in faith and ends in politics." The banking cartel needs a philosophy to justify enchaining mankind. That philosophy is Satanism. The cartel controls the world through a network of occult societies linked to Freemasonry, Communism, the Vatican and organized Jewry (Bnai Brith, ADL, AJC, Zionism.) The highest occult rank is known as the Illuminati.

Modern Western culture is Masonic. Based on Luciferianism, Freemasonry teaches that man and not God determines reality. (Naturally, they need to overrule natural and spiritual laws in order to assert their own control.) They have noticed that people are diffident malleable creatures who prefer to believe what they are told than trust their own reason or perception. Thus, for example, the media successfully promotes homosexual values that conflict with our natural instincts.

MEDIA ERADICATES LOVE

Every facet of the mass media (movies, TV, magazines, music, commercials, news) is used for indoctrination and social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. There is a connection between what happened in Communist Russia and what is happening in America today. In both cases the central banking cartel is asserting its totalitarian control.

The mass media's function is to distract us from this, and the imminent Iran war and North American Union. Currently they are using the global warming fracas for diversion.

In order to destroy the family, the media convinced women that they could not rely on the heterosexual contract.

Myrna Blyth was the editor in chief of Ladies Home Journal from 1981 to 2002. In her book "Spin Sisters" (2004) she says the media sold women "a career in exactly the same drum banging way that the Happy Homemaker had been ..sold to their mothers." (38)

The Illuminati undermined women's natural loving instincts using the following mantras:

1. Men can no longer be trusted. Using the Lifetime Network as an example, Blyth concluded "all men are 1) unfaithful rats 2) abusive monsters 3) dishonest scumbags, or 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand were...flinty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who...want to keep them in their place." (62-63)

2. Women are victims by virtue of their sex. Blyth says the media sends "one message loud and clear. Because we are women, we remain victims in our private lives, at work, in society as a whole." (156) Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays. (See my "Victim as Moral Zombie" )

3. Women should be selfish. "Liberation and narcissism have merged," Blyth says. Leisure now means, "time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one's girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids...Endless articles preached the new feminist gospel, that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman." (65)

4. Sex is not reserved for love and marriage. Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan urge young women to "put out on their first date," ogle men openly" and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women can't trust a man enough to surrender themselves in love.

5. Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family. "The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one's sense of dignity and self worth," Betty Friedan pontificated. In fact, "most work is deeply ordinary," Blyth observes (35-36.) (I'm not saying women can't have jobs, only they shouldn't be tricked out of having families if they want them.)

Thus many women are schizophrenic as they attempt to reconcile their natural instincts with constant exhortations to do the opposite. The wreckage -- broken families and dysfunctional people -- is strewn everywhere.

At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don’t need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.

CONCLUSION

This consistent media drumbeat is organized brainwashing. Society has been totally subverted by the central banking cartel, using a Satanic cult, Freemasonry as its primary instrument. Most masons are unaware of the truth but the owners of the mass media certainly are.

We used to say, "as American as motherhood and apple pie." Only satanists would trash motherhood. Far from empowering women, feminism has unsexed many. It has deprived them of a secure and honored role and reduced them to sex objects and replaceable workers.

Luciferians promote rebellion because they are defying what is natural and conducive to happiness. Like their symbol, Lucifer, they wish to play God.

God's love can be seen in a woman's dedication to her husband and children. Thus the bankers must destroy it.

The Sinister Agenda Behind the Moral Corruption of American Society

It is not by coincidence, nor by natural occurrence, that America is plagued today with whorish singers and actors who are being featured on Prime-time TV, Sesame Street, Nickelodeon, and everything pertaining to teenagers. It's all deliberate, intended to eliminate courtship, replaced by sexual promiscuity. Teen girls are being conditioned to behave like homosexuals, who don't marry and have children...

ERASING GENDER IDENTITY FEMINISM & HOMOSEXUALITY; HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS

Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them.

Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to poison male- female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.

"Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality.

SOURCE: Dr. Henry Makow, Ph.D.; CRUEL HOAX: Feminism & The New World Order.

In Miley Cyrus' vile song, CAN'T BE TAMED, she promotes fornication, rebellion, being whorish and lewd, promiscuousness, partying all night long, getting down, acting crazy, et cetera. This is exactly what the perpetrators behind the New World Order want, i.e., to create a sexually-degenerate society through the use of sexually- degenerate celebrities, movies, music, magazines and television.

In so doing, gender identity is erased, courtship and marriage are eliminated, and parents become mere incubators of servants of the Police State. Moral corruption ALWAYS leads to political subversion! An immoral nation devoid of God cannot maintain it's social integrity. We are witnessing the breakdown of American culture, into chaos and ruin, from which will emerge a dictator—the Antichrist!

America is doomed. I believe we are at the point of no return, because of the filthy trash who own and control the television networks, Hollywood and Walt Disney. People sit in front of their TVs as if worshipping a god. As long as people get all their information from the TV, they will become more foolish, dumbed-down and brainwashed. The moral decline in America will continue it's downward spiral into the abyss of Hell and damnation.

There will be fewer marriages because of fear of divorce and all it's woes. There'll be a lot more shacking up because of sexed pigs like Katy Perry and Miley Cyrus (teaching teens to fornicate and forget about marriage). I dare you to name one sleazy whore singer today who praises the institution of marriage in her music. Name one! It would hurt their sin-glorifying career. You don't become rich and famous in the Pop music industry today unless you're a worldly, compromising, filthy piece of trash. You MUST be supportive of gay rights to make it in Hollywood, music or Broadway.

Parents will become mere incubators, producing servants of a Godless Global Communist Totalitarian Police State. Our nation has gone to Hell. While feminists, CPS and a rigged court system work relentlessly to destroy families over trifle matters; massive government crimes are completely ignored by the media, overlooked and no one is brought to justice. In fact, we have no country anymore because we have no borders anymore.

The Role of Feminism in the N.W.O.

What do factory workers, women, Blacks and homosexuals in Western societies have in common? They all used to have reasons to feel discriminated against. What else do they have in common? Their grievances have been addressed and largely resolved as the result of intense pressure by mostly Jewish intellectuals, media and liberal politicians. Shouldn’t we all be grateful for their effort? Isn’t it proof that Jews are actually making this world a better place?

Of course there is nothing wrong with addressing legitimate grievances of parts of society who are unfairly discriminated against. Factory workers shouldn’t be exploited and worked to death. Women and Blacks shouldn’t be refused equal rights because of gender or colour of skin. And homosexuals shouldn’t have to fear being bashed for being homosexuals.

One of the most difficult things to get our heads around though is the fact that the driving forces behind fixing those grievances did so for all the wrong reasons. The same masterminds and their puppets who pretended to care so much about the plight of the disadvantaged had no qualms about bringing death and misery upon them for their selfish financial and political gains. What they really were interested in is dividing society and turning us against each other like roosters in a cockfight.

This hypocrisy is nowhere more obvious than in the case of the feigned concerns for the plight of factory workers. Communism right from the start has always been a Jewish movement. Its ranks and files right have been stacked with Jews and it was financed and protected by the Rothschild, Warburg and Rockefeller dynasties. Factory workers in communist countries had to work harder and for less pay than their peers in Western countries, and their wages didn’t buy them anything. Yes, their jobs were safer than those of Western workers, but that’s as silly an argument as saying that the advantage of being a slave is job security.

The case of women and Blacks is less obvious. In both cases there are some show cases who are better off thanks to emancipation, but the vast majority of them is not. You only need to look at how many Blacks are lingering in U.S. prisons and how many others are involved in drugs and crime. In fact one out of three Blacks will at some stage in his life be in prison. Emancipation didn’t make women happier either. All it did is destroy families and the ability of most men to earn enough to provide for their families.

It is no surprise that the Jewish merchant bankers’ pet society model, communism, was also the one that pushed hardest for women to go to work. When both parents are working, the raising of the child must be left to society, giving our ruling crime families the opportunity to start with the brainwashing before we know how to speak.

There is a financial aspect too. When women enter the work force, it results in a doubling of the work force, sending wages on a downwards spiral. At the end of the spiral a husband and a wife earn as much as men used to earn on their own. Going to work for women remains no longer a right and a choice. They have to do so for the family to survive.

Men and women are different. Women complain, if faced with a problem, and men go quiet and come up with a solution. Men are hunters and women are gatherers. Men are good at doing one thing at a time, women are fantastic at multitasking. Men get easily carried away thinking in big pictures, and women are more practical and focused on what puts food on the family table here and now.

I’m not saying this is true to ALL men and to ALL women, but it’s true to most. Just have a look at their different shopping behavior. All the shoes women buy to protect their feet from stones and thorns, and all the bags to carry home mushrooms, roots, nuts and fruits. Or look at how most stay home dads struggle with all the tasks a woman easily juggles, even if she has a part-time job.

We are kidding ourselves if we pretend men and women are not different. It doesn’t give us the right to refuse women any of the rights of a man. But we should be conscious of the fact that we all would be better off and happier, if we did what we are designed to do and best suited for.

Stop indoctrinating young girls to study and have a career. Not only is it unnatural, but it takes away jobs from men and halves their income. As a result, women are left with no choice but to go out and work. It reduces the birthrate amongst our smartest women, resulting in a dumb down and a decrease of the population, deliberately disguised by an increase in immigration. Not that all of this bothers our ruling crime families. In fact one of their motivations for promoting feminism is the destruction of the fabric of Western nations, making it easier for them to divide and rule.

Feminism is a NWO agenda to split the families Scandinavia(Denmark/Sweden/Norway) runs the Brave New World programming or the future NWO.

It is like feminist Saudi Arabia where the men are oppressed.

The feminists in Scandinavia are pushed into power and bizarre laws are made in favor of women.

Don't misunderstand me. I'm not anti women. I love women. I'm anti NWO feminist agents.

This one is a real Swedish roadsign. The first one was rejected and replaced with a more doll one:

Both Denmark and Sweden have extreme feminists that are powergrabbing on all fronts. Now they want to have female roadsigns too.

Danish feminist powergrab: "Women have a whole floor to themselves at Danish hotel" http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles...h-hotel.400570

More femi-nazi craziness from Sweden:

"Boys and girls abolished in Sweden

The category of gender was canceled at one of Swedish kindergartens. The words "boy" and "girl" are no longer used there, while pronouns "he" and "she" were replaced with "it". Kindergarten teachers believe that they are successfully breaking the gender stereotypes so that the people of two sexes would not feel predominant towards each other. Experts say, though, that such seeming equality may lead to the genetic rebirth of the population and to the decline of human civilization.

The bizarre mission is taking place in the Swedish preschool called "Egalia." In this kindergarten, pronouns 'han' (he) and 'hon' (she) were replaced with genderless 'hen'." http://english.pravda.ru/society/sto...er_equality-0/

I read in the danish newspaper a school in Denmark did not allow boys to pee standing, they had to pee like a girl.

And an insane lesbian man-hating femi-nazi polician(sorry for my political incorrect language. That is how we communicate when we get passionate) had made it possible for women to stand up and pee. It is all about domination. The manhating feminists wants to be more powerful than men and infiltrate all power structures and use government to create laws in their favor. It is the New World Order agenda.

About Brave New Denmark(The future USA programming): http://www.rense.com/general79/brave.htm

This is how it looks like. The picture is from a danish national newspaper:

Translation of the article: http://translate.google.com/translat...cle2713877.ece

It is not harmless at all. IT'S SOCIAL ENGINEERING!

Danish documentary on National TV about oppressed danish men getting their children take away because of false charges of incest. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...61205946850304

Feminism Was Created To Destabilize Society, Tax Women and set up the NWO - Aaron Russo

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpjmvaIgNA

"Feminism is the WORST thing to happen to women" (Suzanne Venker, NPR interview)

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH-mjGNqlHs

Why? Money and Power. What else…

NEW WORLD ORDER SOCIAL AGENDA: * Defeminize the female, emasculate the male * Destroy the American family by sending women into the work force * Brainwash children to become obedient dolts and shopping automats as adults … THEN TAX AND RULE THE WORLD * * *

When I posted my year-end essay “WHEN DID AMERICA LOSE ITS INDEPENDENCE?,” on Dec 29, 2014, I thought that would be my last word on the subject of the New World Order’s enslavement of America.

After all, I had been researching and writing about the new New World Order for a quarter century now. So I thought I had learned most, if not all, there is to know about this sinister quest for world domination by global plutocrats who consider themselves the “elite.” I was wrong. I learned something new later same day (Dec 29). In response to my essay, a Truth in Media member posted an Aaron Russo video interview with Alex Jones taped in 2007. You will see an excerpt from it in this introductory video update about the New World Order…

* * * (The full Aaron Russo interview with Alex Jones is 95 minutes long. It is quite captivating, however, especially the first hour. It will be worth the time of any American interested in the truth about our country. Click here for more onAlex Jones and Aaron Russo).

So what was the “new news” the late Russo revealed (to me) in that interview?

It was that the Rockefellers, the kingpins of the New World Order in America, funded the “women’s lib”, and thus the destruction of the American family.

Hollywood and the mainstream media were their boots on the ground. They delivered the message to mothers in America:

That was the beginning of the end of the American family as this nation has known it since its inception. It was also the start of a new social war the New World Order waged against nature and Creator’s laws.

Only a week earlier, I was talking to Elizabeth about how in all of the movies we have been seeing recently, the women had been portrayed as the “tough guys,” or as the bosses of the smart detectives, or as super agents in undercover work.

“Even in fluffy TV series like the Glades the police chief is a black woman,” I said. Clearly, that’s no coincidence. It’s “gender profiling” by the New World Order boots on the ground – Hollywood and the media. Female roles are being given masculine attributes while the male characters are portrayed as subordinate or effeminate. “Yet that actually minimizes the woman’s greatest power – HER FEMININITY,” I said. “Hollywood producers are trying to inject the Yang powers into their female characters, and assign the Yin qualities to the male ones.”

“That’s crazy,” I summed it up. “It’s like trying to play God and change nature.”

For millennia, mothers and grandmothers were the cornerstone of our social order. They nurtured the children and held the family together while men went off to wars, or to hunt, fish or work the land. They were their children’s first teachers. They held the moral compass for the whole family.

Now, what happens to a house when you knock out the cornerstones? It starts to creak and crack, right? Eventually, the whole thins collapses.

That’s what has been happening in America during the last half a century since the “women’s lib” movement started (in the early 1960s). Divorce rates are soaring. Families are splitting up. The percentage of singles is increasing.

Nine years ago, this writer published a Truth in Media editorial “When Genders Collide…” (Dec 26, 2005). It was a sequel to my Aug 1996 Washington Times column “When Cultures Collide…” The latter predicted a disintegration of the United States along ethnic lines in the next half a century. The former talked about a destruction of the American family brought about by “women’s lib” during the last half.

Above are some charts from that Dec 2005 editorial that reinforced the conclusion that the American family is being destroyed. And not just American. Everywhere where the New World Order dollars tread, death and destruction of traditional social orders follow.

Nor was this some sort of a spontaneous trend. It was financed by the shadowy figures behind the New World Order. Gloria Steinem, 80, founder of MS magazine and a leading feminist in the 1960s who co-founded theWomen’s Media Center aloing with Jane Fonda and Robin Morgan, was forced to admit that her magazine and the women’s lib were financed in part by the CIA (see Gloria Steinem and the CIA, New York Times, Feb 21, 1967).

Now, why would the New World Order chieftains, like the Rockefellers, want to fund the

“women’s lib” and destroy the American family? Quoting his friend, Nick Rockefeller, a New World Order mover and shaker, Russo provides the answer: MONEY & CONTROL! What else is new in a world ruled by Greed, right? “We could not tax half the population before ‘women’s lib’,” Rockefeller explained. But money was only one reason. The other was even more sinister… power to control the people’s minds and deeds.

George Orwell lives on (see 1984). Welcome to NWO Tyranny 303! (Communism was Tyranny 101, Fascism – Tyranny 202). And to A Nation of Morons, as I put it in this Jan 2006 Washington Times column. So to summarize…

All of which sounded eerily familiar as I watched this Russo interview on Dec 29. Because it was in October 1993 that I first deciphered the New World Order’s MO, and identified the real boss. I called David Rockefeller the “Big Chesse” at the time.

“David Rockefeller, the ‘Sir’ in the Milosevic-Eagleburger conversation(see below), is sort

of the ‘Big Cheese,’ the grand patriarch of the American foreign policy, who ‘owns’ people around him. Using the CFR and the TLC as instruments of power, Rockefeller and his associates have nearly all the political and media bases covered. In the end, it does not matter whether Republicans or the Democrats win. Either way, it will be the (Rockefeller) ‘insiders’ who will run the show in Washington. (A quote from “Plutocracy Is Alive and Well in America,” Truth in Media, Nov 1993) Six years later, in November 1999, during the aftermath of the New World Order’s (NATO) war on Serbia (see Kosovo War/”Peace”, 1999), I was recuperating at my Western Australia home from six months of 18-hour days covering the bombings as war correspondent. That’s when and where I stitched together a New World Order quilt or a flag. I unfurled it for the first time in Toronto, Canada, on Dec 11, 1999, during a speech about “NATO’s War on Serbia – A Gang Rape of a Small Nation.” Today, I reread it again for the first time in years. I was amazed. Every word is as true today as it was over 15 years ago when originally penned. Check it out… (“THE NEW WORLD ORDER FLAG“). * * *

. “9/11 was a kick off of the war against the American people. And the people of the world. 9/11 was a phony. It was a fraud. It didn’t happen the way they told us it happened.” [48:20 mins]

. Also see 9/11 FACADE/FARCE EXPOSED . “He (Nick Rockefeller) told me once they were playing with the idea of bringing Israel to Arizona. You know, taking all the people out of Israel, giving everybody one million dollars, and setting up the state of Israel in Arizona.” [50:45 mins] . “Why does the American government borrow money from the bankers when they can create it without paying interest?” [52:15 mins] . “We are slaves. And it’s getting worse.” [57:55 mins] Q: What do we need to do to bring these people down? [58:00 mins] . A: “In my opinion, we must [garbled… undo?] the Federal Reserve System. There has to be an uprising. There has to be an uprising. People have to stand up…. (But) people don’t seem to have the courage to do what they need to do.”

“Americans, mobilize. Stand together. Stand tall. Tell the government you’re mad as hell. That you will no longer cooperate with the government…. Do everything in your power to restore freedom and individuality back to America… Stand up for your individual rights. Stand up for the godliness that’s in each and every one of us.” * * *

“Our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: a new era—freer from

the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak.” So what was the next thing Bush did to show his devotion to peace? He launched Gulf War I against Iraq! Which was the start of a new world of “perpetual war for perpetual commerce” which eventually culminated in the perpetual “war on terror.”

Bush’s 9/11/90 speech was perfect example of New World Order leaders’ double talk and duplicity. As George Orwell noted in his book “1984.” Remember the Big Brother’s slogans?

Here’s an excerpt from the Truth in Media Apr 3, 1999 story, “Two Parallel Wars: Orwell Would Have a Blast Today“: “War is peace” “Freedom is slavery” “Ignorance is strength” (Orwell) We are living them now. Orwell was off by 15 years. Consider today’s NWO reality:

“Naked aggression” is “humanitarian mission” “Killing” innocent people is “saving lives.” “Peacekeepers” are “warmongers” “Free press” is “war propaganda” (New World Order) (An excerpt from the Truth in Media Apr 3, 1999 story, “Two Parallel Wars: Orwell Would Have a Blast Today“) By contrast. here’s what the Truth in Media said in November 1999 about the true meaning of the current New World Order.

The New World Order creed is: “I believe in nothing!” Its symbol: The Almighty Dollar. Or the Euro. Or… whatever other currency is in vogue.

Its object of worship: The Golden Calf.

Its holy shrine: Wall Street. Its motto: “Perpetual commerce through perpetual war” (NOT “world peace through world trade” – its favored slogan)

The number 11 is a Master Number in numerology. Do you think that’s just a “coincidence?” If so, check out what Russo said about who is responsible for the 9/11.

Also see “Wither US Constitution, Rise of a New “Evil Empire” – Truth in Media editorial, May 2013. * * *

* * *

“No wonder the communist aparachiks, such as Serbia’s president, Slobodan Milosevic, were also on board with the UN/NWO elite for a while. In a November 1993 article titled “Plutocracy Is Alive and Well in America,” I quoted something Milosevic said to me during our first meeting at his office in Belgrade in January 1990. Here’s an excerpt: “I remember meeting (David) Rockefeller as well as (Larry) Eagleburger (the former U.S. Secretary of State) at a gala party to mark the opening of our New York branch,” this former Belgrade banker told me nearly four years ago (i.e., in Jan/90). “And even though Eagleburger was an important government official, while Rockefeller was ‘only’ a businessman, I noticed that Eagleburger called Rockefeller ‘Sir,’ while Rockefeller called Eagleburger ‘Larry.'” […]

“It takes one to know one,” goes the old saw. Maybe the power-thirsty Communist banker, who bullied his way into Serbian presidency, figured out who really runs the American plutocracy masquerading as democracy – the men and women from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission (TLC).” “David Rockefeller, the ‘Sir’ in the Milosevic-Eagleburger conversation, is sort of the ‘Big

Cheese,’ the grand patriarch of the American foreign policy, who ‘owns’ people around him. Using the CFR and the TLC as instruments of power, Rockefeller and his associates have nearly all the political and media bases covered. In the end, it does not matter whether Republicans or the Democrats win. Either way, it will be the (Rockefeller) ‘insiders’ who will run the show in Washington. (Which makes) the ‘world’s greatest democracy’ a little more than an intra-squad competition with the score always predetermined by the ‘Big Cheese’ and his cohorts. It’s like a ‘Yankees’ blue team v. the ‘Yankees’ white squad playing for the World Series title. The 260 million Americans are merely the ‘extras’ who fill the stands, and even pay (taxes) for the privilege of watching the charade! “If Milosevic had figured all this out (in the 1980s), it could help explain why he treated the U.S. government representatives, like Warren Zimmermann, the former U.S. ambassador to Yugoslavia, for example, or Lawrence Eagleburger, the former Secretary of State, with such disdain. Unlike most Americans, Milosevic may have realized that he was dealing with mere minions, not with men of power,” I said in that November 1993 article. Ladies and gentlemen, the preceding lines were written more than six years ago. Yet they are every bit as true today, if not more so, as they were in November 1993. (From http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins99/tim99-11-4.html) And now, here are the patches I used in Nov 1999 to stitch together the New World Order quilt or its flag.

* * *

The man was the late Aaron Russo, a successful Hollywood producer who

became friends with Nick Rockefeller, one of the powerful New World Order insiders. Aaron Russo was born in Brooklyn, New York, in 1943.After a six-year battle with bladder cancer, Russo died on August 24, 2007. Growing up on Long Island, Russo worked for his family’s undergarment business. In April 1968, Russo opened the nightclub Kinetic Playground inChicago, Illinois, originally naming it the Electric Theater. He booked numerous prominent rock groups and musicians at the club such as The Grateful Dead, Iron Butterfly, Jefferson Airplane, Janis Joplin, Led Zeppelin,Rotary Connection, and The Who. In addition to owning his own nightclub, Russo managed several musical acts throughout the 1970s including The Manhattan Transfer and Bette Midler. In 1998, Russo ran for governor of the state of Nevada as a Republican. Placing second in the Republican primary with 26% of the vote to candidateKenny Guinn, Russo was planning to run again for Nevada governor in 2002 as either an independent or Libertarian but was sidelined by cancer. Russo also produced and directed movies, six of them receiving Academy Award nominations, and two receiving Golden Globe Award nominations. His final film would be America: Freedom to Fascism, a political documentary critical of the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Reserve System and warning about the coming of the New World Order.

The Feminist Movement/Women's Liberation was created/funded by Freemasonic Luciferians

The Feminist Movement was designed and funded by the Rockefellers and the Rothschild , two Lucierian “elite” families for 3 things: 1. To pin woman against man without pinpointing a culprit – it’s all men’s fault. 2. Putting women to work to tax the other half of the population. 3. So the state raises your child starting at prekindergarten. No longer is the child raised by family at home. It was... not created to help you - Demonic intentions masquerading as human rights. As a result the government takes the place of the male in women’s lives. Feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are “socially constructed” to oppress them. It is elite social engineering designed to poison male-female relations – divide and conquer. By promoting Feminism, the state is able to gain the allegiance of women to promote more government control. Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Research it so you can believe your own eyes. IT’S A TRAP! IT'S A SET UP! (Gal 4:16) Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? (Hos 4:6) My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

33rdDegree Freemason Albert Pike, known as the Great-grandfather of American Freemasonry tells us that the god of Freemasonry is Lucifer the fallen cherub. He says that Freemasonry is a search for light and also explains who that light is – Lucifer also known as Satan which means Adversary in Hebrew. The Bible explains that Lucifer/Satan can also appear as an angel of light… 2Co 11:14 “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” Albert Pike, Morals & Dogma pg 741 “Freemasonry is a search for Light. That search leads us directly back, as you see, to the Kabalah.” Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma pp 210 "LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darknesss! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls ? Doubt it not!"

Freemasonic/Luciferian manipulation - everything is by design (setting)

What is the spirit behind the freemasonic luciferian feminist movement? Feminist Sara Silverman says a fetus is just "goo." “Meanwhile, it’s goo. It’s goo that they’re so worried about. And they’re born, and it’s you’re on your own, slut.”http://redalertpolitics.com/2014/05/28/sarah-silverman-unborn-babies-just- goo/

Cruel Hoax - Feminism & New World Order by Henry Makow Ph.D. http://www.amazon.com/Cruel-Hoax-Feminism-World-Order- ebook/dp/B004WSQAU0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1405474446&sr=8- 1&keywords=henry+makow+cruel+hoax#_

Feminism, The Rockefellers and Aaron Russo Revelations

Feminism, Eugenics and the New World Order This was originally the script that I wrote for a video produced by my good friend Gonz of Face Like the Sun and Canary Cry Radio. The video was called “Hillary Clinton: Feminism, Eugenics and the New World Order” and it contains a bit of research I did into the history of feminism, it’s ties to eugenics and Hillary’s ties to both. This week, I am doing some research on the UN Women’s Equality Agenda and it’s clear eugenic aim and since the research I did for this video sort of sets the stage for exploring that topic, so I thought I’d share it here. It should be a good overview for anyone seeking to understand the overarching agenda of feminism and so-called women’s equality. As Hillary Clinton blazes down the campaign trail, her campaign has, as would be predicted, been full of passionate and heart-string yanking rhetoric on the importance of women’s equality, women’s rights and feminism. Feminism has become a dirty word in our culture, and many women who believe in equal rights, no longer wish to associate themselves with feminism. We either do not feel properly represented by the movement, or, in my case, we’re suspicious of it’s origins and intentions. You may have heard that the Rockefeller family funded the women’s liberation movement for nefarious reasons, but these claims are hard to substantiate. So what exactly have they done to contribute to the cause of women’s liberation, and, more importantly…why? Family Planning and Eugenics

From the beginning of the Rockefeller family’s philanthropic efforts, reproductive issues interested them. According to the Rockefeller Foundation website: “Concern with family planning issues among the Rockefeller philanthropies began with John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who developed an interest through his involvement with the Bureau of Social Hygiene (BSH). JDR Jr. hoped that support for family planning initiatives would help solve pervasive social ills, including poverty and crime.” The concept of social hygiene was very similar to eugenics, which was a popular philosophy among would-be social reformers of the first half of the twentieth century. It was based on the theory of Darwinian evolution. Eugenics is, according to Webster’s “a science that tries to improve the human race by controlling which people become parents”. Both eugenics and evolution are in stark opposition to traditional Biblical values. Social hygiene and the eugenics movement shared many of the same aims and leaders. During the 1920’s and 30’s it’s common to find the Rockefeller family name associated various eugenics efforts, but they had to remain tactful, as author Lily E. Kay explains: The term “eugenics” became loaded with politics of meaning. The Foundation rejected explicit eugenic projects while at the same time implicitly endorsing eugenic goals and eugenically informed programs. Thus the zealous campaign of Edwin R. Embree (Director of the Foundation’s Division of Studies) to develop a human biology that integrated eugenics with the social sciences..(Lily E. Kay, The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rise of New Biology, Oxford University Press p.23) But the Rockefeller Foundation didn’t let social stigmas stop them from what would become their most notorious philanthrophic effort: the funding of early Nazi eugenics in Germany. In the book, Contemporay Debates in Bioethics, the editors explain that

By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000-almost $4 million in today’s dollars-to hundreds of German researches. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the …Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the… Institute was Ernst Rudin. Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm’s institute eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to…take center stage in German race biology. Leading the Institute once again was Ernst Rudin, Hitler’s medical henchman. Rudin’s oganization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and other “undesirables” Contemporary Debates in Bioethics, Caplan, Arp, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2003 This has always been a black mark on the Rockefeller family record, despite how much they tried to shy away from their association with eugenics. It is impossible to know if they knew what would become of this research, because of course they claim they did not. But to me, the fact that they tried to avoid association with eugenics in the US but funded eugenic research abroad is highly suspicious. However, at home, in the decades prior they had had no problem contributing to the cause of one of the most famous and celebrated eugenicists of all time: Margaret Sanger. the book “Reproductive Rights and the State” says that:

In 1925 Sanger successfully asked the Rockefeller-funded New York Bureau of Social Hygiene for funds…[and when] the bureau was 17,000 dollars in debt, Sanger sucessfully raised 5,000 dollars in funds from the Rockefeller Foundation even though continuing support of institutions was against the official foundation policy. (Haussman, Reproductive Rights and the State: Getting the Birth Control, RU-486, Morning-after Pills and the Gardasil Vaccine to the U.S. Market, ABC-CLIO, 2013) When you mirror the Rockefeller support of Sanger with their other philanthropic efforts in the first half of the twentieth century, it’s hard not to see a trend: preventing childbirth among particular groups of people. Author Angela Franks explains in the book ‘Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility’ that:

The Rockefeller family and its foundations have been the most involved in the whole range of eugenic activities, from funding Sanger’s groups to bankrolling German eugenic studies of race, from founding and paying for the activities of the Population Council in 1952. In 1934 The rockefeller foundation gave its first population grant to the social science research council for a study of population distribution. The rockefeller foundation’s Warren Weaver, head of the Natural Science Division and no stranger to population research, stated in the division’s 1934 progress report, “The challenge…is obvious…can we defelop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men? (Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility, Franks, Angela, McFarland 2005) Could population science have been the integration of eugenics and social sciences mentioned earlier? Whatever the case, Margaret Sanger’s aims were very much in line with the Rockefeller’s. Today, Sanger is remembered as a trailblazing feminist and a champion of women’s rights. However, she was also an open eugenicist and even admitted In the October 1921 issue of The Birth Control Review that “the campaign for Birth Control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical in ideal with the final aim of Eugenics.” And in her book, “Women and the New Race”, she said that that: Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives. (Chapter 18, “The Goal” Women and The New Race) This reference to “a violation of natural law” could perhaps be a reference to people who opposed birth control for religious reasons. Echoing the Rockefeller Foundation’s stated aim for the Bureau of Social Hygiene, she also said in the pamphlet “the eugenic value of birth control propaganda” that “Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.” (“The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda”, October 1921, page 5.) This once again affirms that the goal of both Sanger and the Rockefeller family was to implement widespread eugenics, to breed out social ills and reduce the population. And a crucial component of convincing women to do this was to tell them that taking control of their own reproductive systems was, in fact, liberating and should be a right. Sanger said that: Woman must have her freedom; the fundamental freedom of choosing whether or not she shall be a mother and how many children she will have. Regardless of what man’s attitude may be, that problem is hers; and before it can be his, it is hers alone. As it is the right neither of man nor the state to coerce her into this ordeal, so it is her right to decide whether she will endure it. ” (Chapter 8, Women and the New Race) This quote illustrates perfectly the foundation what would become the so-called “reproductive rights” movement. Despite the fact that to many it is synonymous with the concept of “women’s rights”, is very different than the aims of the first wave of feminism in the early 20th century, which had simply demanded equal voting and property rights for women.

So-Called Women’s Liberation

This new wave of feminism believed that for women to assume equal status in society they needed more than that, they needed to be able to prevent childbirth. This sentiment was echoed decades later at the dawn of the women’s movement of the late 60’s in Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique”. Friedan writes:

Chosen motherhood is the real liberation. The choice to have a child makes the whole experience of motherhood different, and the choice to be generative in other ways can at last be made, and is being made by many women now, without guilt.” (The Feminine Mystique, Friedan, Norton and Company, 1971) By this time, the late 1960’s and the early 1970’s, the discussion of eugenics had covertly become population control, and Betty Friedan’s liberation ideals were sweeping the nation. Friedan herself would become an outspoken population control activist. The Rockefeller foundation began funding women’s studies programs in colleges and universities across the country and even had a radical feminist in their own family, Abby Rockefeller, daughter or David Rockefeller, John D.’s brother, who played her own role both as a voice and a founder of 60’s and 70’s feminism. Friedan inspired more than just pop culture feminism, she also played a role in Rockefeller-funded population initiatives. In 1974, Friedan was in attendance at the UN’s World Population Summit in Bucharest. She claimed to have met with John D before the meeting at which he declared: As long as the social status and economic security of women throughout the world depend largely on the number of children they have, as long as development programs that do reach women deal with them largely or soley in their roles as mothers, they will have good reason to continue having many children…In my opinion, if we are to make progress in achieving population goals, women increasingly must have greater freedom of choice in determining their roles in society” (Goldberg, The Means of Reproduction: Sex, Power and the Future of the World, Penguin, 2009) Here we have, once again, the philosophy that women must given control over their reproductive systems in order to have human rights. It also completely undermines the concept of Biblical female identity and motherhood. This statement from Rockefeller irrefutably links women’s reproductive rights to population control, the modern version of eugenics.

The Nominal Shift From Eugenics to Population Control

Which brings us back to Hillary Clinton. Clinton is, as most people know, a feminist champion. Not necessarily because she is a strong, powerful woman, but because she is a liberal strong, powerful woman. Conservative women, no matter what equal status with men they attain, tend to irk rather than inspire feminists, most likely because of their traditional family values. But of course, Clinton has always been an outspoken advocate for so-called “reproductive rights”. In 2009, she received the Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s Margaret Sanger Award. The same Margaret Sanger award that John D. Rockefeller had received the same award in 1967, in fact, and she has every intention of continuing his and Sanger’s work. In her acceptance speech, she confirmed her support for Sanger and, like Sanger and Friedan, equated women’s equality with birth control. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision…I am really in awe of her.….The 20th century reproductive rights movement, really embodied in the life and leadership of Margaret Sanger, was one of the most transformational in the entire history of the human race…. It has changed attitudes and perceptions about women and our roles in society…. Yet we know that Margaret Sanger’s work here in the United States and certainly across our globe is not done. Here at home, there are still too many women who are denied their rights because of income, because of opposition, because of attitudes that they harbor. But around the world, too many women are denied even the opportunity to know about how to plan and space their families.”(http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2009a/03/120968.h tm) Knowing what we know about Sanger’s vision it is chilling that Clinton mentions that work is not yet done. But also Note that one of the obstacles to making birth control and abortion available to women she mentions is their own attitudes towards it, undermining Biblical principles she believes needs to be changed.

She recently made this sentiment clear at the sixth annual women in the world summit, saying that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” for the sake of giving women access to “reproductive health care and safe childbirth.” And this aim is global. In 2010 at the 15th anniversary of the conference on population and development in Cairo, which had been a landmark event, she said, Women’s health is essential to the prosperity and opportunity of all, to the stability of families and communities, and the sustainability and development of nations…The year 2015 is the target year. What is it we will do between now and 2015? Remember what was expected of us. All governments will make access to reproductive healthcare and family planning services a basic right. For anyone who is hip to things like Agenda 21 or the global elite plans for a NWO, you will recognize the tell-tale verbiage here.

Understanding the Feminist Deception

Birth control and abortion are, in my opinion, simply dressed-up mechanisms of eugenic depopulation. And if women’s liberation was really just a clever way of hiding eugenics and population control under the guise of equality and empowerment, it’s working. The film ‘Demographic Winter’ carefully explains how, from the perspective of objective economists and demographers, global birth rates have been dropping drastically since the 1960’s. They pinpoint the cause of this as increase of women in the workforce and the widespread availability of birth control and abortion. What is happening is that because of things like modern sanitation and health care, people are actually living longer, but reproducing less. And that replacement rates, i.e. enough people being born to keep the population at a consistent rate, are dropping. This means that soon there will not be anywhere near enough young people in the workforce to support the growing aging population. It is a frightening thought and I highly recommend the film for more detailed information on how women’s liberation has impacted global population. Yet despite the hard data, easily found from reputable, mainstream sources, the Rockefeller foundation and other population control organizations continue to promote the idea that too many people are being born. Feminism is by definition the belief that men and women deserve equal status in society. I believe that this very basic definition is Biblical in principle. Galatians 3:28 tells us, “there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” I believe we are all of equal worth to God and, politically, deserve equal rights. However, equal does not mean the same. Men and women are fundamentally different at a genetic level, and simply giving a woman control over her reproductive system does not change this and in fact, I believe undermines what makes women really unique and valuable to society: their ability to carry and bring forth children. God designed us to have children but the eugenicists are trying to play God. I believe it is part of a larger conspiracy that goes all the way up to the god of this world, Satan. But it trickles all the way down to you and I. The covert programming of women’s liberation is everywhere, in commercials, music, movies, education, even in the modern church, and to be honest I’ve barely scratched the surface of the feminist deception. Being a godly and submissive woman in this day and age can be a real battle when the world tells us to take charge and be like a man. I it is my prayer that this video will help women-and then men who love them-understand the true purpose of so-called women’s liberation.

Despite the testimony of Aaron Russo and abundant evidence, Elam thinks feminism was a grassroots movement that expressed genuine feminine grievances. He is unaware these sparks were lit in women’s minds by Communist activists and fanned by the Illuminati media. He thinks the “Alpha Males” willingly ceded power to feminists because of women’s power of “sex selection” – they decide who gets laid. This is ridiculous. ELAM IS “FIGHTING FEMINISM” YET DOESN’T UNDERSTAND THAT FEMINISM IS SOCIAL ENGINEERING SPONSORED BY THE CENTRAL BANKERS WHO CREATE CURRENCY AS A DEBT TO THEM. To protect this fraudulent credit monopoly, the bankers need to pacify and re-engineer humanity by destroying the four pillars of human identity: 1. Religion (God); 2. Race; 3. Nation and 4. Family (gender.) They do this by promoting one religion (Luciferianism); one race (miscegenation) ; one world government; and one gender. Feminism promotes one gender and undermines family.

3. Elam blames men for feminism because, due to an “outmoded masculinity” men were too forceful in asserting leadership. The true enemy “is staring you in the mirror,” he says. But men can forget about dominance now that “the toothpaste is out of the tube.” He espouses a neutered male who “goes his own way” except for crusading against misandry in the legal system and trashing feminists online. THE TRUE ROADMAP

The destruction of marriage and family has always been the goal of the satanist (i.e. Masonic Jewish, i.e. Communist) banking cartel. Before the bankers subverted humanity, women consecrated themselves sexually and psychologically for husband and children. The traditional role satisfied their economic and emotional needs and society’s need to raise a new generation in a wholesome environment.

Now women have been brainwashed to seek power instead of love. Instead of empowering men, women emasculate them and become masculine themselves. Deprived of family love, these sex mutants have become a radicalized political force in the hands of the Illuminati bankers.

WHAT SHOULD MEN DO?

Masculinity is defined by power. Men must be the leaders in a heterosexual relationship. As I have said, women want love; men want power. The Heterosexual Contract is the exchange of female power for male power expressed as love. If either sex breaks the contract, the union is void.

But many women have broken the contract by seeking power. They no longer care to love men or know how. At the same time however, there are many women who are still in touch with their natural instincts and want a traditional relationship.

If a man wants children, or permanent caring and companionship, he can marry if he is 100% sure of his choice. A woman expresses love by abdicating power to one man, her husband. If the woman is from a successful traditional marriage and understands the media’s toxic influence, she is marriage material.

If a man doesn’t want family or a lifelong companion, he can “go his own way.”

There is a long tradition of men who pursue their own goals undistracted by the obligations of marriage and family. Neither path implies a loss of masculinity.

Women are under constant psychological attack. As a result, marriage is a minefield. Either way, despite what Paul Elam says, masculinity is based on male dominance, or what women refer to as “confidence.” Men must assert ownership over wife and children or they will lose interest and women will not respect them.

Finally, the modern world is the product of the triumphant Judeo Masonic conspiracy. If a “leader” like Paul Elam fails to understand this, he is False Opposition, another example of their divide-and-conquer tactic. Cultural Marxism = Feminism, destroying America

Those fems, those militant fems out there who are antimen.... #antimen #feminism #liberals

Remember one item only.....When leaving the security of four walls, home work, play....when leaving after the cover of darkness... and when, not IF, you ask a man to accompany YOU to your CAR..... that who you asked was MAN....not just "a" man...but MAN.

Militant Feminism, coupled with militant homosexuals will NOT rest...until the concept of man and woman is totally BLURRED.....

Don't take your eye off the ball...and men...don't let your balls be taken from you.

Cultural Marxism ("Feminism") is About Destruction

NOTE: The article from Investment Watch reveals the legacy of the 1960s and the cultural Marxism strategy originating in Frankfurt School philosophy. The cultural Marxist strategy for the destruction of supposed “capitalism,” which of course barely exists in a country like the United States that has a central bank (The Federal Reserve, a government charted, but privately owned enterprise), absolutely requires the destruction of the family and the emergence of authoritarian indoctrination of children. The middle class feminist – call them the "1 %" – with one designer-shoe clad foot in the marxist delusion camp and the other in the "having it all" me-me-me camp, has made great "advances" at the cost of the 99% who must pay the price for their hypocritical hedonism.

*** 40 Signs That We Have Seriously Messed Up The NextGeneration Of Americans

Michael Snyder, Investment Watch, September 3, 2012 What in the world have we done to our kids? If you spend much time with them, you quickly realize that the next generation of Americans is woefully unprepared to deal with the real world. They are overweight, lazy, undisciplined, disrespectful, disobedient to their parents, selfish, self-centered, and completely addicted to entertainment. And that is just for starters. We feed them insane amounts of sugar and high fructose corn syrup and then when they become overactive we pump them full of prescription drugs to calm them down. Instead of raising our children ourselves, we allow the government schools and the entertainment industry to do it. By the time they reach the age of 18, they have spent far more time with their teachers, their video games and the television than they have spent with us. Our young people are #1 in a lot of global categories, but almost all of them are bad. Young people in the United States are more obese than anyone else in the world, more sexually active than anyone else in the world and they become pregnant more often than anyone else in the world. Of course it probably doesn’t help that we have the highest divorce rate in the world either. Our families are a complete and total mess and it is our kids that are paying the price. One top of everything else, we have accumulated a 16 trillion dollar debt which we will be handing down to the next generation. I am sure that they will appreciate that. The following are 40 signs that we have seriously messed up the next generation of Americans….see EVIL.

1. Approximately 57 percent of all children in the United States are living in homes that are either considered to be either “low income” or impoverished.

2. More than 25 percent of all U.S. children have a chronic health condition that affects their ability to learn. Perhaps we should not be feeling them so much junk food.

3. In 2011, SAT scores for young men were the worst that they had been in 40 years.

4. The average young American will spend 10,000 hours playing video games before the age of 21.

5. One study discovered that 88 percent of all Americans between the ages of 8 and 18 play video games, and that approximately four times as many boys are addicted to video games as girls are.

6. According to a survey conducted by the National Geographic Society, only 37 percent of all Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 can find the nation of Iraq on a map.

7. According to one survey, 50 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 cannot find the state of New York on a blank map.

8. Only 26 percent of Oklahoma high school students know what the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution are called.

9. Only 10 percent of Oklahoma high school students know how many justices sit on the Supreme Court.

10. At this point, 15-year-olds that attend U.S. public schools do not even rank in the top half of all industrialized nations when it comes to math or science literacy.

11. Children in the United States are three times more likely to be prescribed antidepressants than children in Europe are.

12. The United States leads the world in eating disorder deaths.

13. The average American drinks more than 600 sodas every single year. That is by far the most in the world.

14. Back in 1962, only 13 percent of all Americans were obese. Right now, approximately 36 percent of all Americans are obese, and it is being projected that number will rise to 42 percent by 2030.

15. In America today, many families allow the television to raise their children. In fact, the United States is tied with the U.K. for the most hours of television watched per person each week.

16. There are more school shootings in America than anywhere else in the world.

17. The United States has the highest divorce rate on the globe by a wide margin. This is ripping millions of families with children to shreds.

18. Without solid family units, more kids than ever are joining gangs. Today, there are approximately 1.4 million gang members living inside the United States. That number has risen by 40 percent just since 2009. 19. There are more than 3 million reports of child abuse in the United States every single year.

20. If you can believe it, an average of five children die as a result of child abuse in the United States every single day.

21. Sadly, the United States actually has the highest child abuse death rate on the entire globe.

22. Approximately 20 percent of all child sexual abuse victims are under the age of 8.

23. In the United States today, it is estimated that one out of every four girls is sexually abused before they become adults.

24. According to researchers, convicted rapists in the United States report that two-thirds of their victims were under 18, and among those cases 58% said that their victims were 12 years old or younger.

25. The percentage of children living in poverty has risen from 17 percent in 2007 to 22 percent today. 26. Today, one out of every four American children is on food stamps.

27. It is being projected that approximately 50 percent of all U.S. children will be on food stamps at some point in their lives before they reach the age of 18.

28. As I have written about previously, approximately 42 percent of all single mothers in the United States are on food stamps.

29. According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 36.4 percent of all children that live in Philadelphia are living in poverty, 40.1 percent of all children that live in Atlanta are living in poverty, 52.6 percent of all children that live in Cleveland are living in poverty and 53.6 percent of all children that live in Detroit are living in poverty.

30. It is estimated that up to half a million children may currently be homeless in the United States.

31. It is estimated that child homelessness in the United States has risen by 33 percent since 2007.

32. Right now, approximately 25 million American adults are living with their parents.

33. Law enforcement officials estimate that about 600,000 Americans and about 65,000 Canadians are trading dirty child pictures online.

34. The average high school boy spends two hours watching pornography every single week.

35. An astounding 30 percent of all Internet traffic now goes to pornography websites, and the U.S. produces more pornography than any other nation has in the history of the world.

36. In the United States today, 47 percent of all high school students have had sex.

37. One out of every four teen girls in the United States now has an STD.

38. The United States has the highest teen pregnancy rate on the entire planet by a wide margin.

39. One survey found that one out of every five teen girls actually wants to be a teen mom.

40. We have borrowed 16 trillion dollars that we expect future generations to repay. We have consigned our children and our grandchildren to a lifetime of debt slavery and they don’t even realize it yet. When they do realize what we have done to them they will probably curse us bitterly.

Michael Snyder’s blog is InvestmentWatch. All of US foaming at the mouth with our eloquent punditry with regard to the "state of the union"....Need to KNOW.....this IS what's it's all about.....Cultural Marxism....

Cultural Marxism

Cultural Marxism or Cultural Bolshevism or German Kulturbolschewismus is Marxism as applied in the cultural sphere and the analysis and control of the media, art, theatre, film and other cultural institutions in society, often with an emphasis on class, race and gender. As a form of political analysis, Cultural Marxism gained strength in the 1920s, and was the model used by a group of intellectuals in Germany known as the Frankfurt School; and later by another group of intellectuals at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham, England. The fields of Cultural Studies and Critical theory are rooted in and influenced by work of Cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism is formulated as a way to subvert European nations and civilization using methods other than direct political action.

William S. Lind, Patrick J. Buchanan and others state that Cultural Marxists seek to control society by manipulating language, media, and academia by way of political correctness by employing the Frankfurt School's "Critical theory."

Europhobia and demographic genocide are a major focus of Cultural Marxism.

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/09/cultural -marxism-feminism-is-abouit.html

http://www.thedailybell.com/1240/Nelson-Hultberg- Cultural-Marxism-The-Corruption-of-America

Once upon a time...Good ruled man....and then along came Evil ...cloaked...in celebration of the malcontent.. from the link. The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create "Critical Theory" and "deconstruction". These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call "Political Correctness". The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right back to Karl Marx.

The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a "classless society", i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition. Since that vision contradicts human nature - because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point - society will not accord with it unless forced. So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced. This is the first major parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on campuses where "PC" has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought are all eliminated.

The second major parallel is that both classical, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by which groups - defined by sex, race, religion and sexual normality or abnormality - have power over which other groups.

Communism, Zionism & Feminism Share NWO Pedigree Mankind Is Entering A New Dark Age

George Orwell's warning in "1984" of the enslavement of humanity in a global police state was not an idle exercise. It was coming true in 1949 when the novel was published. The attack on the World Trade Center Sept. 11, staged by NW0 controllers with Hollywood flair, heralded the next phase in this centuries old plot.

Veteran journalist Douglas Reed, writing in 1951, was also aware: "We might logically assume that a primary object of any third war, though cloaked at the start, would be the expansion of the Zionist State, and the imposition of a 'world federation' and a new 'management' of mankind. In the aftermath of the Second War such aims, earlier concealed, were much more openly admitted by leading politicians" (Far and Wide, p.291)

In 1913, the shareholders of the Federal Reserve took a major step toward the enslavement of humanity when they finagled the right to create money out of thin air based on the credit of the American people. This monopoly which rightly is the responsibility of Congress, is worth more than $360 billion annually in interest alone. They are doing everything to protect this monopoly, including the establishment of a global police state.

I discovered this mind-boggling intrigue last December when I probed for the reason why the "establishment" actively promotes the socially destructive Marxist lesbian ideology of "feminism."

By "feminism" I am NOT referring to the right of women to fair and equal treatment in the workplace. That is a façade for a far more pernicious agenda, which I discuss elsewhere.(http://www.savethemales.ca/031001.html).

This week I became aware that Communism and Zionism are also part of the same pattern.

If you wanted to enslave humanity, would you announce your intentions?

Rather, you would bait your hook with promises of public ownership, sharing and universal brotherhood. This appeals to the public's naivete, idealism, and self-interest.

At its heart, Communism is a system of social control and oppression dedicated to smashing the pillars of western civilization: nationhood, democracy, Christianity, free enterprise and the nuclear family. It cares for no other principle than raw power and exercises it ruthlessly.

Members of the Comintern referred derisively to people who bought the party line as "innocents." This is the Communist "modus operandi." There is a publicly stated goal (like equal rights) that appeals to everyone. Only the inner circle knows that the true agenda is to subvert social institutions and gain arbitrary power.

The Soviet Union was the banker's original version of the "New World Order" (the Communists used that term). In "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution," which is on line, Antony Sutton describes how the bankers and their allies engineered the Russian Revolution and bankrolled the Soviet Union. (http://reformed- theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/_)

Because the same financiers control our media and education system, this was news to me. Likewise, it was surprising to learn that (Jews dominated Communist Russia from its inception. (http://www.hoffman-info.com/communist.html.)

If you want to undermine the social order, you empower minorities that are ostracized by society. In the Jewish people, the bankers, who were often Jewish themselves, found an ideal instrument for their NW0 agenda. In "The Last days of the Romanovs," (1920) Robert Wilton writes, "Taken according to the number of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevik Russia they are nine in ten, if anything the proportion of Jews is still higher." (391)

Marxism appealed to a sublimated religious urge on the part of largely atheistic Jews to "build a better world" on secular humanistic basis. When their usefulness was over, many of these Jews were imprisoned or liquidated. Arthur Koestler is an example of many Communist Jewish writers who recorded his disillusionment (see "The God that Failed," "The Invisible Writing, "Darkness at Noon."). Ayn Rand, a Russian Jewess, also denounced Communism and extolled individualism and freedom ("Fountainhead," "Atlas Shrugged").

Nevertheless we don't hear much about atrocities that Jewish Communists perpetrated in the USSR. (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments- USSR.html#anchor1218070.) They attempted to eradicate all vestiges of the traditional Czarist social structure. In the collectivization of the Ukrainian farmers (kulaks), an estimated 10 million people were starved or shot. Millions more died in mass executions in the Baltic, massacres of Cossacks and Volga Germans, in the genocide of three million Muslims, and in Gulag slave labor camps.

As a Canadian Jew, and the son of Holocaust survivors, I feel an obligation to educate myself about Jewish responsibility in this era in Russian history.

Like Communism, I'm afraid Zionism may be another example of how the bankers manipulate the Jewish people for their own ends. Most Israelis would be happy to live in peace within the 1967 borders. They are not aware of a possible hidden agenda: Israel may have been funded for the purpose of imposing New World Order hegemony on the Middle East, or even the world.

Israel doesn't make a lot of sense in any other terms. The Israeli founding elite mostly originated in Russia where after 1917 Jews apparently had a privileged position. One of Stalin's first acts was to make anti-Semitism "punishable by death." The Zionist elite was atheist so the biblical injunction to return to the Holy Land was for propaganda purposes only.

In his book "Fallen Pillars: US Policy towards Palestine since 1945," (1995) Donald Neff tells how in 1919 Hugh Gibson, the newly installed ambassador to Poland, was chastised by Col. Edward Mandell House for reporting that Zionists were exaggerating Anti-Semitism in Poland for their own purposes. House threatened to block Gibson's confirmation in the Senate. Also present: American Zionist chiefs Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter.

Who was Col. House? You won't hear about him in establishment histories. He was Rothschild's agent and President Woodrow Wilson's handler. He later controlled FDR with the help of Bernard Baruch, Louis Howe and Harry Hopkins.

Gibson was young enough (36) to be incensed. He wrote a 21-page report for his colleagues in which voiced his suspicion that the Zionists had "a conscienceless cold- blooded plan to make the condition of the Jews in Poland so bad that they must turn to Zionism for relief." (http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-worldconspiracies-zionism- fallenpillars.html)

One wonders if Jewish immigration to the US and elsewhere from Nazi occupied Europe was curtailed for the same reason.

Modern feminism is another NW0 Communist front inspired and led by Marxist Jews. Most of the leaders of the "second wave" were "red diaper babies", so called because their parents were Communists. They are characterized by a bizarre conviction that Western Civilization is evil because it was created by men, and therefore needs to be torn down. It has turned the university humanities curricula to mush and psychologically sterilized two generations of women.

In the view of Kenneth Minogue, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, London School of Economics, " the radical feminist revolution is nothing less than a destruction of our civilization. It has all happened in such a way that people have not yet realized what has happened." (see: How Civilizations Fall)

Communists, Zionists or Feminists Jewish or not-- are simply not aware that they are being used by the international bankers to create an Orwellian New World Order. If they strip away the rhetoric, they will discover that the NWO is a long-term plot to consolidate global wealth and power in a few hands. It is a scheme to degrade, enslave and even exterminate people, and to divorce humanity from God and nature.

Mankind is entering a new Dark Age.

How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women

Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

I will expand on the Rockefeller's role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility. This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as "an old fashioned, oppressive stereotype" even though it reflects their natural instincts.

On Thursday a British writer reported overhearing two young women:

"All men are useless these days," one said. "Yeah," said the other. "The trouble is that they haven't risen to the challenge of feminism. They don't understand that we need them to be more masculine, and instead they have just copped out."

That's their logic? If women are less feminine, men will be more masculine? Men aren't designed to fight with women. They need to be affirmed by a woman's acquiescence and faith. When women constantly challenge them, men will "cop out" of marriage and family.

Now that love and marriage have been "discredited," women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry.

Permanent love is not based on a woman's sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.

THE BIG PICTURE: THE CENTRAL BANKERS

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive.

Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Midler's movies and "America: From Freedom to Fascism" identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

MEDIA ERADICATES LOVE

Every facet of the mass media (movies, TV, magazines, music, commercials, news) is used for indoctrination and social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. There is a connection between what happened in Communist Russia and what is happening in America today. In both cases, the central banking cartel is asserting its totalitarian control.

In order to destroy the family, the media convinced women that they could not rely on the heterosexual contract.

The Illuminati undermined women's natural loving instincts using the following mantras:

4. Sex is not reserved for love and marriage. Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan urge young women to "put out on their first date,"ogle men openly" and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women can't trust a man enough to surrender themselves in love.

At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don't need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.

CONCLUSION

We used to say, "as American as motherhood and apple pie." Only satanists would trash motherhood. Far from empowering women, feminism has unsexed many. It has deprived them of a secure and valued social role and reduced them to sex objects and replaceable workers.

Luciferians promote rebellion because they are defying what is natural and conducive to happiness. Like their symbol, Lucifer, they wish to play God.

God's love can be seen in a woman's dedication to her husband and children. Thus the bankers must destroy it.

The Devil's Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda

I believe the world has for the last hundred years or more been in the grips of a conspiracy by an ultra rich elite whose goal is nothing less than the destruction of civilization, as we know it. I believe we are in the advanced stage of a gradual decline into a "New World Order" which combines monopoly capitalism with communist totalitarianism.

Believe me, this is an argument I would be delighted to lose.

We have been conditioned to scoff at the mention of conspiracy The idea that people might plan something without telling the intended victims is much too farfetched! Nor would they ever disguise their aim! My purpose is not to convert you to my view. Rather, I want you to seek information that either confirms or refutes it.

We are like the passengers on a bus that keeps having "accidents" which cause untold death and suffering. These are wars, depressions and epidemics etc. We have just completed the bloodiest century in human history: Auschwitz, Dresden, Ruanda, Hiroshima, Cambodia. Over a hundred million people were murdered, and that's not counting abortions.

We keep changing the 'driver' but the accidents do not cease. This is because the drivers all take their orders from the same diabolical source.

Because the human race keeps running off the road, we are not reaching our destination. The road is G-d's plan. For Christians, this is Jesus' Gospel of Love. The destination: to know G-d. Mankind evolved for this purpose. G-d wishes to be known by His Creation.

Our purpose is to know ourselves to be Divine. G-d is the principle of our evolution, both personal and collective. Truth and Goodness are Absolutes: they are G-d. All great religions teach us to listen for G-d's voice and obey it.

When we deny the existence of G-d, we are denying the principle of our own evolution and stunting our development. When we deny God, we deny ourselves. When we deny man's divinity, we open the door for genocide.

A reader "Pat" wrote last week that he has "a hard time believing that a group of elites could agree on anything, let alone a far reaching evil agenda...[It] seems like the process of achieving this agenda is too slow for any bad people...requires too much flawless, seamless, secretive, cooperation...The only entity with that kind of plan and patience with that kind of plan and patience would have to be the devil himself, wouldn't it?"

I replied that he was on to something. At the beginning of the 20th Century, huge fortunes were built by monopoly capitalists like J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller. The "D" stands for "devil." What is monopoly but the desire to "have it all," and to drive everyone else out of existence. Evil is the spiritual cancer that seeks to "fulfill" itself not in G-d, but in limitless material acquisition and sensual excess. It was not a large leap for a J.D. Rockefeller to go from owning the oil industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the banking industry etc. to wanting to own the whole world. This is the reason that Rockefeller and his foundation have been in the forefront of the population "control" and eugenics movement. Ultimately the goal is to reduce the earth's population for the simple warped reason that the less there is for you and me, the more there will be for J.D. and his cronies.

The elite just loves birth control. Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Ted Turner are among the ultra rich that have donated billions to spreading the gospel of contraception, abortion, and feminism using the United Nations and "US Aid." Rockefeller funded the invention of the pill, the IUD and owns the rights to the abortion drug RU-486. In the last 50 years, billions of public dollars have been spent on "family planning" designed to limit population by deceit and coercion, including compulsory abortion and infanticide. In "The War Against Population (1988)," Dr. Jacqueline Kasun writes that in 1981, a directory of population control agencies in Washington DC listed 92 private (but mostly publicly funded) agencies, 12 United Nations and 57 agencies of the US government (p. 198). "The real problem of government family planning is not one of families out of control but of planners out of control," she wrote (p.211).

For the same reason, the Elite is behind "sexual liberation" and "gay liberation." Through funding and media control, they make us regard sex as a recreation/physical release rather than as the expression of a spiritual bond (i.e. a loving marriage) resulting in children.

The Elite modus operandi is to finance and promote disgruntled minorities in order to destabilize and undermine the world. Feminism is a prime example. It pretends to be about giving women equal opportunity in the workplace when in fact it is devoted to discouraging women from seeking fulfillment in motherhood.

In the bible of modern feminism, "The Feminine Mystique" (1963) Betty Frieden makes this obscene comparison between housewives and Nazi concentration camp inmates:

"They were reduced to childlike preoccupation with food, elimination, the satisfaction of primitive bodily needs; they had no privacy, and no stimulation from the outside world. But above all, they were forced to spend their days in work which produced great fatigue...required no mental concentration, gave no hope of advancement or recognition, was sometimes senseless, and was controlled by the needs of others..."(306)

Clearly Frieden is talking about mothers. Comparing the nurturing of their children to the brutal slavery and poisoning of Auschwitz inmates is psychological warfare of the most vicious kind. Friedan, who hid the fact that she was a paid Communist activist, should have been denounced as a hate monger. Instead she was celebrated as the new oracle and received honorary degrees and fellowships at Harvard, Yale and Columbia. Saturday Review called her book "a scholarly work, appropriate for serious study" and anthropologist Ashley Montegu said it was "the wisest, sanest, soundest, most understanding and compassionate treatment of American woman's greatest problem."

Do we need further proof that the world is one-horse company town, and J.D. and his cabal own the company? They decide which politicians, universities and academics get funding, which books get published and reviewed, which movies get made. We are condemned to look into mirrors that don't reflect reality. That's why we are so skeptical of conspiracy. That's why most people on this web site don't get published. On the other hand, Eve Eisler, is reading her pornographic play "The Vagina Monologues" on HBO this month. This "play, " which features women looking at their genitals with hand mirrors and describing steamy scenes of lesbian sex with minors, masquerades as feminist empowerment. In fact, it is an invitation to lesbianism.

Feminism fits the elite's depopulation agenda. Since 1963, when "The Feminine Mystique" was published we have experienced an unprecedented breakdown in the family. More than half of all children are now born out of wedlock; the number of single parent households has tripled. In "The Broken Hearth," William Bennett writes: "Most of our social pathologies, crime, imprisonment rates, welfare, educational underachievement, alcohol and drug abuse, suicide, depression, STD's, are manifestations, direct and indirect, of the crackup of the American family (p.4)."

We are now suffering from underpopulation. The US birthrate has been cut from 4 to 2 children per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.2 just for replacement.) Russia (1.17 children) will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million by 2015. In the "Death of the West," Pat Buchanan argues that population decline is responsible for the inevitable extinction of the West.

Reproduction requires the most delicate care. In the case of human beings, the female must be prepared for motherhood and honored for her contribution to society. The male must be shown that the standard of manhood is to provide leadership and sustenance for mother and children. Both mother and father must be able to give their children intellectual and spiritual guidance.

Instead, in schools and universities, the tender shoots of feminine sexuality are crushed under the feminist jackboot. Young women are taught that heterosexual sex, marriage and family are inherently oppressive. Homosexuality on the other hand is an act of rebellion that is "chic" and "normal."

Frieden's comparison of mothers with the concentration camp inmates is pertinent. Betty Frieden, agent of the elite cabal, has put mothers in the concentration camp. Mothers!? The ultimate aim is genocide. The Elite want the world's population to be much smaller. Can there be any question that this is the devil's work?

Woman Begs Men: "Rescue Us from Suicidal Feminist Brainwashing Thursday the war between the "Social Justice Warriors" (aka Red Guards) and men centered around a particularly nasty meme: a video by a woman walking through New York, claiming to be 'harassed' by cat calling and men saying hello. It has received more than 10 million views.

But our women are learning too, and when they do, they immediately become a force for good again......

The two main things that are visible in this video are the incredible body language of the young woman, walking and looking as if she's constantly spit upon, and the generally friendly and good natured, albeit it sometimes somewhat primitive greetings from the men.

Yes, the scene with the guy walking alongside her for while was a little over the top, but the woman could easily have stopped it, by simply slowing down or halting, forcing his hand.

The message is that male attention is harassment. The Communists ('Feminists') want to end natural, pleasant relations, by mind controlling women into thinking this is male interest is 'harassment'. Men have no right, apparently, to be attracted to a pretty young women, let alone make it be known.

And, unopposed, it works. Plenty of women fall for it, as many comments showed. However, when asked directly, many women said that cat calling and nice gestures by men are not at all unwelcome in themselves, when not overbearing.

Here's what a friend Saba who lives here in Amsterdam had to say about it, an insightful, sad and simultaneously uplifting view.

Saba:

"In the 70s and 80s, we were forcefully told that men were all rapist, violent, controlling and oppressors by nature and it would only be a matter of time and opportunity for them to show their real nature.

Women have also been taught, through the magazines, TV, advertising etc. that we are all 'goddesses' within and that it is for us to let the goddess within us shine.

(left, Saba, visiting Bali)

In the 90's, a new cult was forced upon us: the super model cult. You remember that group with Claudia Schiffer, Cindy Crawford, Karen Mulder, Naomi Campbell etc.... Interesting to point out that it did not last, I think it was not meant to last, but its effects are visible now.

Most women now react like they are super models. We feel insulted when a man approaches us, unless his social status is visible.... in that case, we feel very flattered...

But with most men, we feel suspicious, we feel insulted: how dare he talk to me? How can he approach me? What does he have to 'offer' or to give me? And we react very aggressively, very arrogantly, sneer at whoever does not look 'rich'.

Modern men, who for the most part have been raised by their moms alone after she got rid of the dad, are now petrified to say hello to woman or simply smile at her.

Men seem to be troubled by so many thoughts that kind of paralyze them and prevent them from making a move toward someone they find attractive: 'she is too beautiful for me, too rich for me, too intelligent, out of my league' etc.

And when a woman smiles back, we have a weird situation: they now think 'OK, what is wrong with this one? Why is she smiling back? She must be the cheap kind' etc.

This has happened to me....

But women are still women and our genetic code has not changed (not yet!). And we still want the same thing, which is: we only want men to love us.

APPROACH-AVOIDANCE

Society has provided us with great 'diversion' so that we do not see through it, so that we do not think about our deep loneliness and misery, so that we fill up the gap only a man can fill. These diversions are our jobs, friends, shopping, 'social life' (think Sex and the City), but the older we get, the more the spell fades away.

Often, it is too late. Women still dream of the same thing our grandmothers did. But we do not understand why men do not approach us; we all wonder where have real men gone.

We think and are told by the magazines/TV/ads, that we are not beautiful enough....And so we go to the gym, we diet, we dress in a way that we know you will like. We read more women magazines to get tips on how to wear make up, dress, even make love. We do all this for you.

But you do not react and so we undress more and more; all this to get you to look and smile at us.

You do not react because you are so scared to. And when some of men do react, then we repel them (if they do not look rich).

It is a vicious circle that can only end once women realize that they have been taken for a ride and get off the feminist bandwagon.

Western men are the ones who do not react. Arab men and black men do and are the only ones because they have not been yet emasculated. There was a time, not so long ago, in the 1990s, where Latin men did as well. These were my student years and I remember them very well. And now, even Latin men have been reigned in. And the greatest losers of this situation is us, women.

Trust me Anthony, believe me, all women, when alone or amongst each other, we all wonder where have men gone and we all dream of them coming back...."

And Saba added:

"I was surrounded by gay men, in all my London years: gay men are very 'masculine' in their bodies and cultivate the macho look to the extreme. But THAT is ok.

Straight men who want to look like men and not like metro- sexuals, are called macho and that is an insult, which women use the same way we use 'fascist'.

'Don't know how to treat a lady, don't know how to be a man'.

Women no longer act like women but want to be treated like ladies. But we are scared or suspicious when a man does treat us that way or acts like a man and so we reject them.

How on earth can we get out of this impasse? What can we do, what can be done?" ------

Related- Man Walking 10 hrs through NYC (Satire) ------Charges Video was Racially Biased against Blacks ------Makow - Liberal Jews, Sex & the New Satanic Order ------The Brussels Belgium Video

Feminism is Dying Ann Coulter And The Female Vote Cultural Marxism: Managing The Ant Farm

Anthony Migchels is an Interest-Free Currency activist and founder of the Gelre, the first Regional Currency in the Netherlands. You can read all of his articles on monetary on his blog Real Currencies and other highly opinionated articles on Making Sense of the Senseless.

First Comment by Rich

Very good article, and I especially love the comment from Saba.

It is all due to the goddess and radical feminism as mentioned by Saba that these women are so thoroughly brainwashed by.

Goddess feminism itself had 5 main goals as well. They said "We women are; 1) Going to put and end to God 2) Destroy the bible 3) Destroy Christianity 4) Destroy men 5) Destroy heterosexual relationships

"The pupils of radical feminist leaders have generated a third wave of the women's movement--resenter feminists. Walking in the footsteps of Stanton--who resented being born a woman--these women are organized, angry and determined to change totally the way society thinks and functions. They blame men, and a Bible-based patriarchal society created by men, for women's woes. They consider knowledge, truth and reason to be masculine concepts used to control women. They question all history because it was written largely by men. Naomi Goldberg explained their ultimate goal: "The feminist movement in Western culture is engaged in the slow execution of Christ and Jehovah... God the Father of Judeo- Christian Scripture as the architect of the patriarchal society... will have to go... we women are going to bring an end to God" (Spirit Wars, Jones, 1997, pp. 180, 195)." Feminism is dying

(Above: The UN thought it sly to put a young starlet in front of millions with some particularly pathetic talking points. As a result she was widely ridiculed on the web.) Feminism has quietly lost all support from women, except perhaps those brainwashed in University. By Anthony Migchels, for Henry Makow. In 2012 a major study was published, showing that women across the board are disentchanted with it. They consider it ‘too agressive against men’, ‘old fashioned’, ’70 per cent of younger women feel far too much is expected of them, with unprecedented pressure to ‘be red-hot lovers, domestic goddesses, climb the career ladder and look like supermodels’.‘ But the real knock out is: “The majority of the 1,300 polled felt feminism should be about ensuring women have ‘real choice over their family, career and lives’, and to reinstate the value of motherhood.” It is exactly this sentiment that Feminism was designed to destroy.

According to Simone de Beauvoir, a disturbed woman, like most of the Feminists that were unleashed on an unwitting public by the Rockefeller Foundation, put it this way: “No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.”” And the trend is long term: the number of stay-at-home moms has beenslowly rising over the last decade, after a calamitous free fall in the seventies and eighties. True, after tanking the labor market by flooding it with millions of cheap, easily manipulable wage slaves (‘independent women’), this is nowadays a tough proposition for many families. It’s now very difficult to run a family on one wage. Still the trend is clear and remarkable.

While the arty farty ‘liberal’ (Cultural Marxist) MSM is still parading ridiculous little whores like the above in front of the masses, claiming of this particular wench that she is ‘redefining beauty’, the real story is on the Web: the men’s movement has hammered feminism on-line and the ‘Social Justice Warriors’ are constantly on the defensive. Their insane man hatred (which is the core of Feminism) is being exposed more and more. Every time they are confronted with coherent argumentation, they immediately succumb to narcissist breakdowns, claiming ‘people like you are why the world is such a mess’, or ‘fucking dickhead’. Clearly indicating lack of arguments, manners and most likely mental stability.

The SJW’s still manage to destroy careers, like recently PGA President Ted Bishop, after he said a golfer behaved like ‘a little girl’. That comparing a man with a little girl could be considered insulting is still hard to fathom for the little girls that currently control the debate.

But the real story is in the comments of for instance this article: the public clearly sees this is unacceptable. At the moment, Gamer Gate is thrashing the feminist controlled Media via their online outlets, particularly Reddit.com, which is also a hotbed of agitation against the ‘Domestic Violence’ hoax. Domestic violence is mainly perpetrated by women and it has been well known since at the least the seventies that the best shot that women have to avoid violence against them is……..refraining from violence against their mates: no less than two thirds of ‘battered women’ admit committing ‘severe violence’ against their husband before getting a taste of their own medicine. Gamer Gate has such fall out, that major corporate sponsors are starting to see that Feminism is not about women’s rights, but is actually attacking their main consumer base: men.

“Perhaps it won’t surprise you to learn that microchip manufacturers and car companies are pretty sympathetic to the concerns of male consumers. But some of the things said to me–all, sadly, on condition of anonymity–have been nothing short of remarkable. There’s the Intel vice president who told me via email that GamerGate was “doing great work” and that he was “sick of slander and self-loathing from the press”. He was talking about male journalists who do misandrist feminists’ work for them.” In another funny development, Fox News Host Kimberly Guilfoyle, openly stated on TV, that young women should not vote and should not be on juries, but instead should be buying shoes and keeping an eye out onhttp://www.match.com. While this is an obvious statement for anyone born before 1930 or otherwise endowed with some basic understanding of human nature, it’s a far cry from what has become the norm in our completely pussified society, ruled by girly ‘sensitivities’.

After getting scorched by the Left, she did not at all recant, and her co-host, a former press secretary at the White House, simply chimed in agreeing with her.

It’s not really surprising that women are saying this: they tend to be accutely aware of the nonsensical pussy worship that so many men are mind controlled into. Women are well known to prefer male bosses, for instance. Women, more than anybody else, know about the female darkside.

Conclusion While Feminism and Cultural Marxism is taking a heavy beating on the Web, the MSM is clutching at straws to fend off the inevitable. But this only hastens their own demise. Meanwhile, many among the men’s movement, including major outlets like www.avoiceformen.com, are taking a wholly wrong turn by joining the Feminists in clamoring for ‘equality’, pointing at egregious inequality before the law, for instance in family courts, or punishment for men and women for the same offenses.

But there is no equality. Men are more spiritual, more rational, have a bigger brain and are simply much more powerful than women. Women are more earthly, emotional and have a womb. Men want to possess their women and women want to be possessed. The male longing to possess her proves to her that she is wanted and desired. This also explains why by far most women are submissive in bed. We can have something much better than equality: Male Privilege and Female Privilege.

We can have love.

Communists Conceived Women's Liberation Movement

March 15, 2015

This 2003 review of Kate Wiegand's Red Feminism: Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation is a useful reminder that the transformation of society in our lifetime was inspired by Communist dogma. Feminism has been instrumental in society's induction into occult Jewish Cabalism, i.e. Communism, Satanism. Society is complicit in its own enslavement.

"There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960's-1980's that wasn't prefigured in the Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA) of the 1940's and 1950's."

"Rape is an expression of ... male supremacy ... the age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men."

Does this sound like a modern radical feminist? Guess again. It is from a American Communist Party pamphlet from 1948 entitled "Woman Against Myth"by Mary Inman. In a 2002 book, Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation, feminist historian Kate Weigand states: "ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women's movement of the 1960s and later."(154) In fact, Weigand, a lecturer at Smith College, shows that modern feminism is a direct outgrowth of American Communism. There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960's-1980's that wasn't prefigured in the CPUSA of the 1940's and 1950's. Many second-wave feminist leaders were "red diaper babies," the children of Communists. Communists pioneered the political and cultural analysis of woman's oppression. They originated "women's studies," and advocated public daycare, birth control, abortion and even children's rights. They forged key feminist concepts such as "the personal is the political" and techniques such as "consciousness raising." In the late 1940's, CPUSA leaders realized that the labor movement was becoming increasingly hostile to Communism. They began to focus on women and African Americans. They hoped "male supremacy" would "bring more women into the organization and into the fight against the domestic policies of the Cold War." (80) Communist women who made up 40% of the party wanted more freedom to attend party meetings. After the publication of "Women Against Myth" in 1948, the CPUSA initiated a process of "re- educating" men that we recognize only too well today.

For example, in the party newspaper "The Daily Worker" a photo caption of a man with a young child read, "Families are stronger and happier if the father knows how to fix the cereal, tie the bibs and take care of the youngsters." (127) The Party ordered men who didn't take the woman question seriously to complete "control tasks involving study on the woman question." In 1954 the Los Angeles branch disciplined men for "hogging discussion at club meetings, bypassing women comrades in leadership and making sex jokes degrading to women." (94) A film Salt of the Earth, which critic Pauline Kael called "Communist propaganda", portrayed women taking a decisive role in their husbands' labor strike. "Against her husband's wishes, Esperanza became a leader in the strike and for the first time forged a role for herself outside of her household... [her] political successes persuaded Ramon to accept a new model of family life." (132) Portrayals of strong assertive successful women became as common in the Communist press and schools, as they are in the mass media today.

Communist women formalized a sophisticated Marxist analysis of the "woman question." The books In Women's Defense (1940) by Mary Inman, Century of Struggle (1954) by Eleanor Flexner and The Unfinished Revolution (1962) by Eve Merriam recorded women's oppression and decried sexism in mass culture and language. For example, Mary Inman argued that "manufactured femininity" and "overemphasis on beauty" keeps women in subjection (33).

The founder of modern feminism, Betty Frieden, left, relied on these texts when she wrote The Feminine Mystique (1963). These women all hid the fact that they were long-time Communist activists. In the 1960, their daughters had everything they needed, including the example of subterfuge, to start the Women's Liberation Movement.

THE COMMUNIST CHARACTER OF FEMINISM Feminism's roots in Marxist Communism explain a great deal about this curious but dangerous movement. It explains:

 Why the " woman's movement" hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like "equality" on a personal, biological and mystical relationship.

 Why the "women's movement" also embraces "equality" of race and class.

 Why they want revolution ("transformation") and have a messianic vision of a gender-less utopia.

 Why they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion.  Why they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism.

 Why truth for them is a "social construct" defined by whomever has power, and appearances are more important than reality.

 Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence in favour of their political agenda.

 Why they refuse to debate, don't believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views.

 Why they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard.

It's hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. Communism is designed to give power to the puppets of central bankers by fostering division and conflict. Divide and Conquer. Having failed to peddle class and race war, Communism promoted gender conflict instead. In each case they fostered a sense of grievance in the target group. Now the traditional feminine role "oppressed" women. (Left, another Communist psy op.) The "diversity" and "multicultural" movements represent Communism's attempt to empower and use other minorities, gays and "people of color," to further undermine the majority (European, Christian) culture. Thus, the original CPUSA trio of "race, gender and class" is very much intact but class conflict was never a big seller. The term "politically correct" originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920's. Its usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes. The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization and establish a veiled dictatorship called "world government" run by the toadies of the central bankers. We have seen this destruction in the dismantling of the liberal arts curriculum and tradition of free speech and inquiry at our universities. We have seen this virus spread to government, business, the media and the military. This could only happen because the financial elite in fact sponsors Communism. In Communism, government is the ultimate monopoly. It controls everything, not just wealth but also power and thought. It is the instrument of monopoly capital (i.e. Rothschild, Rockefeller.) Everybody from the President on down works for them. A LOCAL EXAMPLE "Political correctness" has dulled and regimented our cultural life. In 2002, here in Winnipeg, Betty Granger, a conservative school trustee referred to "the Asian invasion" causing house price increases in Vancouver. Granger was pilloried mercilessly in the press. People sent hate letters and dumped garbage on her lawn.

At a meeting, the School Board Chairman acknowledged that Granger is not a racist and Asians have married into her family. Nonetheless, Granger was censured because, I quote, "appearances are more important than reality." This slippage from the mooring of objective truth is the hallmark of Communism. The atmosphere at the meeting was charged. Mild mannered Canadians, all champions of "tolerance," behaved like wild dogs eager to rip apart a trapped rabbit. Betty Granger repented and voted in favor of her own censure. These rituals of denunciation and contrition, typical of Stalinist Russia or Maoist China, are becoming more common in America. They are like show trials designed to frighten people into conforming. We have "diversity officers" and "human rights commissions" and "sensitivity training" to uphold feminist shibboleths. They talk about "discrimination" but they freely discriminate against Christians, white heterosexual men and traditional women. They use the specter of "sexual harassment" to fetter male-female relations and purge their opponents.

CONCLUSION In 1980, three women in Leningrad produced ten typewritten copies of a feminist magazine called Almanac. The KGB shut down the magazine and deported the women to West Germany. In the USSR, feminism has largely been for export. According to Professor Weigand, her "book provides evidence to support the belief that at least some Communists regarded the subversion of the gender system [in America] as an integral part of the larger fight to overturn capitalism."

In conclusion, the feminist pursuit of "equal rights" is a mask for an invidious Communist agenda. The Communist MO has always been deception, infiltration and subversion using social justice issues as a pretext. Communism can take any form that empowers the puppets of the central bankers. The goal is the destruction of Western civilization and creation of a new world order run by monopoly capital. This has largely been accomplished. Kate Weigand's Red Feminism demonstrates that we live in a de facto Communist society, a development which took place by subterfuge with the complicity of the Masonic central banker- controlled Establishment.

We have an excerpt from the text of the new world order

CHAPTER 29 THE ATTACK ON THE FAMILY said that it was likely to result in "maladjustment of the child."

This was the consensus view of the vast majority of psy- chologists, psychiatrists, pediatricians, and the general public until the medical and professional organizations capitulated to the demands of the feminist movement in the 1970s.

The continuing debate over Dr. Jay Belsky's recent "heresy" is testimony to the power of the feminist/day care lobby in academic and professional circles. Belsky, a professor of child psychology at Pennsylvania State University, was, a decade ago, one of the influential voices that saw no harm in institutional child care. Now, he says, convincing research shows that non-maternal care for more than 20 hours per week for children under a year old is a "risk factor." Day care at that young age can impede secure parent/child relationships and lead to rebellious and aggressive behavior, or shy and withdrawn behavior in the preschool and early years. His views have caused him much grief, as colleagues and feminists have come down hard on him for his views. They have impugned his research, his credentials, and his motives. 585

Even Dr. Benjamin Spock, certainly no "conservative" in other matters, has also resisted the push for group child care, especially before the age of three. He has taken a position that appears to be out of character for him. He has written:

"It is stressful for children to have to cope with groups, with strangers, with people outside the fam-

;, ii 586

And another "certified Harvard liberal," Professor Burton White, warns parents:

"Unless you have a very good reason, I urge you not to delegate the primary child-rearing task to anyone else during your child's first three years of life." 58

But the debate is certain to continue. Those who want to destroy the family will continue to urge mothers to leave the home and "become fulfilled in the workplace." When the mother goes into the workplace to "become fulfilled," or to increase the family's income, she leaves the care of the children to others.

Feminism and the NWO “Only by experimentation can we open up new possibilities which will indicate lines of development in which the status quo is a given term. Women’s revolution is necessarily situationist: we cannot argue that all will be well when the socialists have succeeded in abolishing private property and restoring public ownership of the means of production. We cannot wait that long. Women’s liberation, if it abolishes the patriarchal family, will abolish a necessary substructure of the authoritarian state, and once that withers away Marx will have come true willy-nilly, so let’s get on with it.Let the men distribute leaflets in the factories where the proletariat have become hire-purchase slaves instead of communists. The existence of hire-purchase slaves is also based upon the function of the wife as a stay-at- home consumer…But man made one grave mistake: in answer to vaguely reformist and humanitarian agitation he admitted women to politics and the professions. The conservatives who saw this as the undermining of our civilization and the end of the state and marriage were right after all; it is time for the demolition to begin…” [1]

“Not only do they want your sons…but they want your daughters as well!”[2]

“Everybody somewhere between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will serve three months of basic training…We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong…A few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no…We’ve got to give them a stake in creating the kind of world order that I think all of us would like to see…This is critical to the globalist master plan. Because in four to eight years Obama must take the blame as Bush did for the New World Order’s horrific agenda…For their program to work it is essential that the people not learn that the presidency is now nothing more than theater. Because if they did the people would stop looking for the pawns and start looking for the King…His most important function is to protect the criminal oligarchs from prosecution while they loot the economy worldwide, start new wars, and engage in torture…is scientifically designed to capture the public in a net of peer pressure mass euphoria If the New World Order can just distract the public for a few more years, the elite can finish constructing their police state control grid… “[3] “This information is jaw-dropping. Many believe Russo was murdered because of the things he revealed about Nick Rockefeller’s secret plans.”[4]

‘”The city of Boston and its surrounding areas have ground to a standstill as the manhunt continues in a 20-block radius of Watertown, with local leaders warning residents to stay indoors. Police also announced there will be a ‘controlled explosion’ in a building in Cambridge Friday afternoon.

‘It is important that folks remain indoors, keep the doors locked and not open the door unless there is a uniformed law enforcement officer on the other side of it,’ Gov Deval Patrick said at a 12:30 p.m. press conference.

At approximately 3:30 a.m., Massachusetts State Police issued a plea on Twitter for residents of Watertown to lock their doors and not open them for anyone as dozens of police officers, many of them off-duty, searched backyards and exteriors of houses there, and a police perimeter of several blocks was established…”[5]

” We must now say proudly and without any exaggeration that apart from Soviet Russia, there is not a country in the world where women enjoy full equality and where women are not placed in the humiliating position felt particularly in day-to-day family life. This is one of our first and most important tasks…. Housework is the most unproductive, the most barbarous and the most arduous work a woman can do. It is exceptionally petty and does not include anything that would in any way promote the development of the woman…The building of socialism will begin only when we have achieved the complete equality of women and when we undertake the new work together with women who have been emancipated from that petty stultifying, unproductive work…. We are setting up model institutions, dining-rooms and nurseries, that will emancipate women from housework…. These institutions that liberate women from their position as household slaves are springing up where it is in any way possible.”[6]

” The chief thing is to get women to take part in socially productive labor, to liberate them from ‘domestic slavery,’ to free them from their stupefying and humiliating subjugation to the eternal drudgery of the kitchen and the nursery. This struggle will be a long one, and it demands a radical reconstruction, both of social technique and of morale. But it will end in the complete triumph of Communism.”[7]

If I could make one plea to all the women and men of the world, it would be for them to wake up! No longer is this just a Western issue, as the plague of feminism and women’s liberation is being spread around the globe. Feminism isn’t about your rights. It never has been. Feminism has global goals. It always has since the beginning. But even most conservatives are too fooled and tricked by the media to see it for themselves. Even the most conservative out there have bought into the lies and believe feminism to be about creating some sort of mythical options for women. The entire feminist agenda was to collapse society, create chaos and pave the way for socialism and the New World Order. The elite know, just as they always have, that the only way to produce the police state and New World Order that they seek is to breakdown society by breaking apart families. There is no liberation to be had for women, but only enslavement. By entering the workforce in droves, women only contribute to their own enslavement and the misery of everyone. Women’s liberation gives the elite exactly what they want. So, the question is now, do we sit around and keep promoting “gender equality,” or do we wake up and do something to change what is sure to be our fate? History always has a way of repeating itself. With all the means of instant communication today and abundance of knowledge at our fingertips through such mediums as the internet, we can be the exception if we so choose.

Marxist Feminism as Pioneer for NWO America’s culture has come a long way since the 60s. For decades it has resembled a filthy sewer and shows no signs of returning to decency. Children are being sexualized with markets targeting little girls as young as kindergarten age. Cable television (which includes ABC, CBS, NBC) has become nothing more than a purveyor of soft porn. Sexual imagery is everywhere. Meanwhile, we have raised an entire generation of young males that don’t know how to be men. Our culture has taught them to be extremely hesitant to be husbands and fathers, and instead it has taught them to be sex-obsessed idiots that want to “score” with as many women as possible. *

Abstract: Feminism includes a lot of different directions. Below, “feminism” means the radical Redstocking movement of the 1968 Revolution. More than most other descendants of the Talmudist ‘68 revolution, they have changed our societies according to the guidelines of Adam Weishaupt / Mayer Rothschild. By taking central professions like teachers, sociologists and journalists, they have often intentionally turned the traditional gender pattern upside down against biology: boys are raised as girls and vice versa in nurseries, Kindergartens and schools. In practice, this often means they have made women ambitious and winners, leaving the boys without confidence in the loser´s role. Much like television plays have for many years been showing women as the bosses and men as their subordinates.

Their claim is now even that there is no biological difference between the brains of men and women. Although science tells that there is such a difference – but that does not worry feminists: It would be uninteresting. However, ignoring that carries great suffering for both sexes. Women usually do want to work with people, men to work with mechanics. Feminists are only concerned about their ideological theory. A property that characterizes these feminists is endless tolerance leading to identity suicide with Muslim mass immigration. They seem angry with tradition – and happy with Marxist theory. They are – perhaps unwittingly – Marxist revolutionaries: “Women are an oppressed class, we are seen as inferior beings whose sole purpose is to improve the lives of men. Our personal suffering is a political condition. All other forms of exploitation and oppression (racism, capitalism, imperialism, etc.) are extensions of male supremacy “- so says the Redstockings Manifesto 1968. The fight for power between man and woman is just as old as mankind. Whereas it took place in homes in former days, the battlefield is now the public space. Now, women have brought it so splendidly far that they serve as soldiers – even as battallion leaders for men on the battlefields in Afghanistan – which has always been the most despicable thing for male warriors. Therefore, one can hardly wonder that potent but isolated and frustrated soldiers rape 30% of female soldiers – perhaps as revenge – in the U.S. military in Afghanistan and Iraq, .

Feminism was politicized by the suffragettes in the 19. century. I know that in many cases women are unhappy with feminism: Many have to both be breadwinners to pay the rent (which the banksters regulate to the level that it can only be paid by two wages) and to take care of the household and furthermore have time to educate their children instead of leaving this to ideological teachers as demanded by Marx. Many women today have become slaves of the NWO system. In fact, I find it difficult to find named women connected with “feminism”, just “groups” – whereas it is very easy to see a lot of – Jewish elitist /Talmudic/NWO/Marxist men behind it. The ‘68 revolution was the work of Jewish Marxist elitists of the Frankfurt School – after the Talmudic recipe by Adam Weishaupt / Mayer Rothschild. Jewish Henry Makow, said: “Many Kabbalist Jews are Satanists. They have the money, form the secret leadership, and manipulate many others. There are many decent Jews like myself who have been used as Trojan Horse for the Illuminati under the aegis of communism, socialism, liberalism, feminism, zionism, neo conservatism and “gay rights.” Purpose: world domination through a completely separate synchronized global population. But they want to first fuse Christian religion and to abolish the nation states. In my childhood, especially the women raised children in the Christian faith – while the men were hardly concerned with the kids. So, in order to abolish the family pattern the NWO just had to dechristianize the women – e.g. through more work outside and inside their homes, so they would not have time to wipe out the ideology that is indoctrinated in their brainwashed the children – just as Marx demanded. To achieve this goal, progressive Sweden has banned everything reminiscent of the traditional family pattern: In toy catalogs boys must be shown playing with puppets. The EU imitates this. Families with the husband as breadwinner and the wife as homeworking are not allowed to be shown. Children are to see porn, and they should learn in kindergartens to adopt homosexual couples as something normal! Is this paving the way for Paedophiliacs? As equality is being enforced by feminist politicians the gap between men and women grows wider – and child pornography and paedophilia increase. In the wake of the “women’s liberation” 68 followed free access to provoked abortions: In Denmark, 15.000 a year. Purpose: To create a lack of work force to pave the way for mass immigration from Muslim countries, thereby destroying the old order to build the new Luciferian world order on the ruins. The 40-50 percent of dissolved marriages show how efficiently the 68s revolution paves the way for the communist NWO. And the children? They are left unhappy and disoriented by the roadside * “Young people don’t want to identify as feminists because there is this man-hating, frumpy, lesbian image forced on us.” ”Feminism doesn’t seem to be about equal rights any more. Women, legally speaking, have equal rights. Discrimination still exists but the feminist movement has moved to a point where the aim isn’t equality, it’s empowerment. They want to gain power and ‘punish’ men.” Pop-culture representations of feminism have got to be at least partly to blame. TV and movies often portray feminists as over-the-top, man-hating and not all there. Caitlin Moran represents today’s feminists the way we are – just informed women who don’t think we’re quite there yet on the equality front.

The Androgynous World Order: Feminism, the LGBTI Movement, and the Abolition of Gender

The 144th Congress of Correction, which was held between August 15 to August 20, 2014 in Salt Lake City, featured a workshop over the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) and its ramifications for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) populations in detention. The consensus of those presenting this workshop was that inmates of these particular orientations were at increased risk for sexual victimization. Never once during the course of this workshop was the possibility raised of LGBTI inmates actually perpetrating such victimization. This omission betrayed an implicit partiality for those who embrace unconventional sexual orientations. Perhaps this omission was, to some extent, attributable to the overall outlook of those who assembled the workshop. The chief speaker was Bernadette Brown, who, in addition to being a Senior Program Specialist for the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, is a self-avowed lesbian. During her presentation, Brown boldly declared, “Gender is a social construct” (Brown). This radical claim, which hinges on a purported disjunction between sex and gender, is certainly nothing new. In recent years, it has been largely popularized by socially and politically active feminists. Recognizing the equally advantageous implications of the sex/gender dichotomy for their own social movement, various LGBTI rights organizations have adopted it as a central rationale for their platforms as well. Underpinning the claim is the tacit promotion of androgyny as normative. In turn, the promotion of androgyny can be traced further back to the most pervasive of ancient heresies: Gnosticism. The pseudepigraphical Gospel of Thomas exemplifies this normative view of androgyny. In Saying 22, the Gnostic revision of Christ portrays androgyny as a salvific union: Jesus said to them, “When you make the two into one, and when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner, and the upper like the lower, and when you make male and female into a single one, so that the male will not be male nor the female be female, when you make eyes in place of an eye, a hand in place of a hand, a foot in place of a foot, an image in place of an image, then you will enter [the kingdom].” As is the case with most revolutionary movements that populate modernity, feminism qualifies as what Eric Voegelin called a Gnostic political religion. Gnosticism taught that, in the beginning, there was a spiritual singularity (the “Pleroma”) within which divinity functioned at optimal potency. This pure unity was divided into a plurality by the error of an intermediate deific being known as Sophia (“Wisdom”). Emanating from Sophia’s own being was a defective consciousness that eventually assumed the Biblical appellation of Jehovah, who the Gnostics blasphemously caricatured as the “Archon of Arrogance.” This misotheism was attributable to the Gnostics’ assignment of an ontological status to evil. With evil no longer imputed to the will, corruption was projected upon all things external to the Gnostic. This projection encompassed the external world, which invariably became the recipient of either explicit or implicit contempt.

Because they believed that evil possessed substance and form, the Gnostics were predisposed to some variant of Docetism and Manichean dualism. The diminution of the human condition, which Biblical Christianity identifies as the Fall of humanity’s original parents, was conflated with the very act of creation. After all, if evil possesses form and substance, then only a malevolent God would fetter the purity of spirit to the corruption of matter. The exoneration of God entailed the arbitrary bifurcation of His roles as Creator and Father into two separate deities. God the Father was docetistically portrayed as absolutely transmundane, ontically distant from the created order. God the Creator was portrayed as a veritable warden presiding over the cosmic prison of the material world. Thus, the Gnostics vilified the Biblical God because of His creatological role.

The palpable realm was a horrible accident resulting from a precosmic splintering of the Pleroma. As corrupt and detached fragments of the emanated divine essence, the ontological confines of the material world were regarded with a docetistic cosmological attitude. Through this interpretative lens, the existential status of physical embodiment was tantamount to imprisonment. Herein is the basis for the normative view of androgyny. Because the possession of sex organs is a defining feature of physical embodiment, Gnosticism expressed a tacit derision for the gender categories of male and female. From this anthropological pessimism arose a broader cosmological pessimism. The temporal-spatial realm was regarded as a penal colony governed by the demonic agents of time and space. Humanity was supposedly thrust into this cosmic prison through the act of creation. Fettered by the physical laws of nature and an objective morality codified as the Mosaic law, the pneuma (spirit) of man found itself separated from the divine pneuma and in a perpetual state of alienation. This state could only be overcome by action based upon gnosis (i.e., direct revelatory knowledge of humanity’s unity with the divine). Gnosis was considered superior to pistis (faith). The Gnostic conception of unity with God should not be confused with the Orthodox Christian conception, which is distilled in 2 Peter 1:4. In that passage, Peter states that Christians enjoy the promise of becoming “partakers of the divine nature.” What Peter was describing was theosis, a transformation in the Christian’s whole being that conforms him/her to the image of the resurrected Christ. In contradistinction, Gnosticism actually taught that man was part and parcel of God. As such, man was ontologically equivalent with God. Thus, the promise of gnosis was the promise of the transfiguration of human into divine or apotheosis. In the original Greek, the prefix apo- conveys spatial denotations such as “away,” “off,” “from,” and “apart.” These terms indicate a distinction or a separation. Of course, theos means “God.” So, apotheosis means a transfiguration that takes place completely apart from God. Salvation, for the Gnostic, was not man’s redemption from sin through Jesus Christ, but his redemption from the stupefaction of his isolation and alienation within the material cosmos through gnosis. Gnosticism divorced the Creator from the salvational process, thereby opposing Christianity’s theocentric soteriology with an anthropocentric soteriology. During the 18th century Enlightenment, religious Gnosticism became political Gnosticism. As religious Gnosticism was transmogrified into political Gnosticism, its dualistic framework was inverted. Where ancient Gnosticism valued transcendence, the new Gnosticism valued immanence. In contradistinction to objects of transcendent experience, objects of immanent experience are within the experiential limits of man. As such, they permanently pervade the physical universe. Will, consciousness, and even the Divine are ontologically anchored to material agencies. In this sense, immanentist Gnosticism synchronizes rather comfortably with modern materialism, which is ironic in light of its ancient antecedent’s docetistic atttitude towards materiality.

The codification of the ancient Christian heresy of Gnosticism into revolutionary doctrine resulted in the secularization of the very Christian eschatology that Enlightenment thinkers derided. For the modern Gnostic, the eschaton (i.e., end of days) indwells history itself. This secular eschatology, which assumed a myriad of forms among modern socialist revolutionary movements, proffered a redemptive world history that culminated with an immanent Parousia facilitated by the hand of man. For instance, Marxism held that the proletariat would redeem the world from thousands of years of class exploitation. Likewise, Hitler’s Aryanism promised to redeem the world from the alleged corruption of mankind by so-called “inferior” races. Cultural feminism, which has rose to prominence in recent years, seeks to redeem the world from millennia of alleged male domination. The Gnostic strand running through the fabric of feminism is made evident by the movement’s experiments in religious engineering. Viewing religion through the same pragmatic optic of Enlightenment luminary August Comte, feminists attempt to re- sculpt traditional faiths along socially and politically expedient contours. Theologian Rosemary Radford Ruether declares: “Feminist theology must create a new textual base, a new canon… Feminist theology cannot be done from the existing base of the Christian Bible” (Ruether ix). What is one of the chief sources of inspiration for feminist theology? The answer is provided by feminist theologian Chung Hyun Kyung, who candidly states: “[F]eminists are free to use the ancient Gnostic texts, originally rejected as heretical, because the Christian canon was created by men” and that “women are not obliged to accept a book… they had no part in framing” (qutd. in Jones 82). According to Voegelin, the modern Gnostic’s anthropocentric soteriology can only attain the semblance of sense in the absence of God. After all, in order to create a new order, one must first supplant the creator of the old one. This cosmic regime change stipulates the ultimate revolutionary act: deicide. Voegelin reiterates:

In order… that the attempt to create a new world may seem to make sense, the givenness of the order of being must be obliterated; the order of being must be interpreted, rather, as essentially under man’s control. And taking control of being further requires that the transcendent origin of being be obliterated: it requires the decapitation of being – the murder of God. (35-36)

The murder of God is precisely what the feminist has in mind. Feminist Naomi Goldenberg has stated: “[T]he feminist movement in Western culture is engaged in the slow execution of Christ and Jehovah. Yet very few of the women and men now working for sexual equality within Christianity and Judaism realize the extent of their heresy” (Jones 195). Synopsizing the feminist objective of deicide, Goldenberg declares: “We women are going to bring an end to God” (180). Where the ancient Gnostic laid claim to gnosis (i.e., secret knowledge) as the nucleus of their anthropocentric soteriology, the feminist lays claim to a fabled enlightened androgyny. The irony is that, while androgyny ostensibly combines male and female traits, the feminist actively works to rob women of their femininity. This theft is effected through the divorce of gender from sex. Just as the Gnostic viewed the cosmos and its inherently hierarchical order as an illusion projected by some malevolent demiurge, the feminist portrays masculinity and femininity as synthetic constructs imposed upon humanity by some chimerical patriarchical tyranny. The bifurcation of sex and gender relies upon the perennially debated dichotomy of nature and nurture. Within the polarizing framework of the sex/gender divide, sex is portrayed as a product of nature while gender is depicted as a consequence of nurture. However, developments in neuroscience are rendering the nature/nurture dichotomy untenable. Darlene Francis and Daniela Kaufer state:

The “nature vs. nurture” conundrum was reinvigorated when genes were identified as the units of heredity, containing information that directs and influences development. When the human genome was sequenced in 2001, the hope was that all such questions would be answered. In the intervening decade, it has become apparent that there are many more questions than before. We’ve reached a point where most people are savvy enough to know that the correct response isn’t “nature” or “nurture,” but some combination of the two. Yet scientists and laymen alike still spend too much time and effort trying to quantify the relative importance of nature and nurture. Recent advances in neuroscience make a compelling case for finally abandoning the nature vs. nurture debate to focus on understanding the mechanisms through which genes and environments are perpetually entwined throughout an individual’s lifetime. (“Beyond Nature vs. Nurture”)

Since advancements in neuroscience are swiftly banishing the nature/nurture dichotomy, it stands to reason that the sex/gender divide is being banished with it. If nature and nurture are not dichotomously related, then neither are sex and gender. Thus, sex and gender cannot be situated within the extreme polarities of some sort of binary opposition. Such a binary oppositional framework results in terminological confusion concerning both the general disparities between the sexes and the internal nuances that arise within each. In Gender, Nature and Nurture, Richard Lippa draws attention to this terminological confusion: Some researchers have argued that the word sex should be used to refer to the biological status of being male or female, whereas the word gender should be used to refer to all the socially defined, learned, and constructed accoutrements to sex, such as hairstyle, dress, nonverbal mannerisms, and interests. However, it is not at all clear the degree to which the differences between males and females are due to biological factors versus learned and cultural factors. Furthermore, indiscriminate use of the word gender tends to obscure the distinction between two different topics: (a) differences between males and females, and (b) individual differences in maleness and femaleness that occur within each sex. (3-4)

Lippa observes that “”the very concept of gender is partly defined by differences between the sexes–differences in men’s and women’s dress, grooming, occupational choices, communication styles, aggression, and nonverbal behaviors” (4). Indeed, differences define gender. Those differences include biological distinctions. All of the semantic gymnastics aside, gender and sex remain synonymous. This axiomatic synonymy defies any disjunction that the sexual revolutionary may wish to impose upon the two.

The disjunction imposed upon gender and sex is an arbitrary one. It is designed to provide the sexual revolutionary with an expedient degree of elasticity in redefining the parameters of sexual sanity. If one’s sexual identity can be divorced from biology, then even the most harmful forms of intercourse can be justified. The extent to which this reality offends the delicate sensibilities of the politically correct is irrelevant. The juvenile objections notwithstanding, it is an inescapable medical fact that deviant forms of intercourse are accompanied by certain health risks. Chief among these deviant forms of intercourse is anal sex, a practice exercised prolifically within the homosexual milieu and some of the unconventional quarters of heterosexuality. No matter how loudly these enclaves may object, the fact is that even many secular medical authorities agree that anal intercourse is harmful. One such authority is Robert I. Krasner, a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Biology at Providence College. He writes:

Some sexual behaviors are considered more risky and unsafe than others. Anal sex is the most dangerous because the lining of the anus is more subject to tears and injury than is the lining of the vagina, allowing the AIDS virus (and other microbes) easier passage into the blood. (416)

Of course, objective research seldom deters those who believe that reality will re-adjust itself to accommodate their hedonism. This mentality is exemplified by self-avowed “sex professor” Debby Herbenick, who promotes anal intercourse as a “way to explore and act out new fantasies with [your] lover” (11). In light of the obvious health risks inherent to such a mode of intercourse, such a promotion betrays a childish refusal to commune with truth on its own terms. To circumvent the inconvenient facts surrounding their harmful practices, sexual revolutionaries conjure up the fictional disjunction between gender and sex. The ultimate goal is to rationalize the rejection of the immutable natural order and enshrine one’s own appetites.

Underpinning the divorce between sex and gender is a pervasive dysteleological outlook. Through this interpretative lens, biology becomes a mere accident of nature. That one happens to be male or female is a consequence of blind, purposeless forces imposing themselves upon machines composed of meat. Ironically, proponents of such an outlook often give their assent to evolutionary theory, which is irreducibly teleological. No matter how much the evolutionist may object, the fact is that the evolutionary process strives towards a telos. Such striving presupposes the guidance of a rational agency. It is terribly difficult to invoke blind, purposeless forces while simultaneously positing a system of intricate design. Thus, even if biology were the result of evolution, the biological classifications of male and female would hardly qualify as accidents. Moreover, the dysteleological portrait of the universe is a meaningless one. This portrayal is self-refuting. The one who claims that existence is meaningless must first assume that his or her own dysteleological proclamation is a meaningful one. If the universe were actually meaningless, then one could never express such a view meaningfully. Evidently, there is meaning in the universe. Otherwise, even dysteleological contentions could not be coherently conveyed. This internal contradiction of the dysteleological outlook belies the true motives of the ones who invoke it. Those motives are articulated rather candidly by Aldous Huxley:

I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning. For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality, because it interfered with our sexual freedom. We objected to the political and economic system, because it was unjust. The supporters of these systems claim that in some way they embodied the meaning–a Christian meaning, they insisted–of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confusing these people and at the same time justify ourselves in our political and erotic revolt. We could deny that the world had any meaning whatsoever. (270)

The objectives of “political and erotic revolt” are rendered ostensibly tenable by the “philosophy of meaninglessness.” The division of sex and gender also hinges upon such dysteleology. Ultimately, the “philosophy of meaningless” camouflages revolutionary objectives. The various feminist and LGBTI organizations that are currently re-sculpting Western civilization harbor similar revolutionary aims. This fact underscores yet another contradiction endemic to the sex/gender dichotomy. The claim that gender is a social construct is self-refuting because it is, essentially, the product of movements (particularly various feminist and LGBTI organizations) advancing their own set of social constructs. Thus, the claim itself is a social construct. Since social constructs are viewed as mutable at best and inherently false at worst, one must conclude that the depiction of gender as a social construct is rendered untenable by its own criteria of acceptability.

Assuming that gender is a social construct, one would be committing the Genetic Fallacy by presupposing its falsity on such grounds. Simply underscoring a belief’s possible point of origin does not automatically render that belief false. One might argue that the warning to avoid speaking to strangers is a social construct, but very few would actually consider ignoring that parental admonition just because it might have originated through societal or cultural practice. In fact, gender categories might have originated through societal or cultural practice because society or culture recognized certain immutable truths at one time. One such immutable truth was that nature and biology will not re-adjust themselves to accommodate the desires of those seeking to redefine the parameters of sexual sanity.

Many individuals from across the political spectrum have noted feminism’s role as an agent of destructive social change. Sources as diverse as right-wing radio pundit Rush Limbaugh and dissident feminist Camille Paglia have commented on the ways in which the feminist movement, in particular the second-wave feminism that was launched in the 1960s, caused a gradual defection from sexual sanity and an erosion of social stability. Few, however, have written or spoken about modern feminism’s origins in the sub rosa levels of politics and intelligence. The fact that modern feminism was cultivated in the unseen world of deviant elites and criminalized intelligence circles cannot be dismissed as paranoid fantasy.

Aaron Russo, the famed deceased American film producer and director, may have learned a portion of feminism’s hidden history during conversations he had with Nicholas Rockefeller, a member of the infamous Rockefeller dynasty. Some debunkers and pathological skeptics have asserted that Nicholas Rockefeller was merely an invention of Russo’s imagination. Nicholas Rockefeller, however, is a very real person, as is evidenced by the following biography provided by Bloomberg’s Businessweek: Mr. Nicholas Rockefeller has served as the company Director since February 1999. Mr. Rockefeller is an attorney with the law firm of Troop Meisinger Steuber Pasich Reddick & Tobey, LLP, and has been with the firm since June 1997, prior to which he was engaged in the private practice of law for ten years. Mr. Rockefeller also serves as a Managing Principal of the Rockvest Development Group and its affiliate, the Rockefeller International Fund, which supervises investments in publicly traded securities and private enterprises and maintains an active venture capital portfolio. Mr. Rockefeller is also Chairman of Rockefeller Asia, a financial services company. He serves as Member of Advisory Board at RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy. Mr. Rockefeller is a member of the California and Washington, D.C. bars, and holds a J.D. from Yale Law School. Mr. Rockefeller is the trustee of The SHMNM Investment Trust, which is currently a stockholder of the Company and which was established pursuant to a stockholders’ agreement between Mr. Nicholas Matzorkis and The Kushner-Locke Company. Mr. Rockefeller was elected a director of the Company as the director designated by the trust pursuant to the stockholders’ agreement. (“Company Overview of RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy: Nicholas Rockefeller”)

In addition to proving that Nicholas Rockefeller is not a fiction, the Businessweekbiography also gives readers an idea of the status and position that this particular member of the Rockefeller dynasty holds in elite circles. Nicholas Rockefeller is not a low-level businessman or a bottom feeder; he, like many other members of the Rockefeller dynasty, is a serious mover-and-shaker. According to Russo, Women’s Liberation came up as a topic of discussion during one of his visits to Rockefeller’s residence. Rockefeller allegedly asked Russo: “Women’s Liberation is all about?” (“Reflections and Warnings – An Interview with Aaron Russo”). Russo gave the widely accepted answer, stating that Women’s Liberation was “about women having the right to work and getting equal pay with men, just like they won the right to vote” (ibid). Russo claimed that Rockefeller began laughing at his answer and called him “an idiot” (ibid). Rockefeller then told Russo that the Rockefeller dynasty had financed the Women’s Liberation movement with two goals in mind (ibid). The first goal, according to Russo, was to bring women into the workforce so that a larger portion of the population could be taxed (ibid). The second goal, Russo asserted, was to disintegrate the traditional nuclear family so that children would begin viewing the State as their family (ibid).

The Intelligence Community appears to have played a significant role in the social engineering campaign Rockefeller described to Russo. For many years, the Rockefeller dynasty has been immersed in the world of intelligence. During the Cold War, intimate ties between the Rockefeller Foundation and U.S. intelligence circles were established. Author Frances Stonor Saunders shares some of the details concerning this unholy marriage: The convergence between the Rockefeller billions and the U.S. government exceeded even that of the Ford Foundation. John Foster Dulles and later Dean Rusk both went from the presidency of the Rockefeller Foundation to become secretaries of state. Other Cold War heavies such as John J. McCloy and Robert A. Lovett featured prominently as Rockefeller trustees. Nelson Rockefeller’s central position on this foundation guaranteed a close relationship with U.S. intelligence circles: he had been in charge of all intelligence in Latin America during the Second World War. Later, his associate in Brazil Colonel J.C. King became CIA chief of clandestine activities in the Western hemisphere. When Nelson Rockefeller was appointed by Eisenhower to the National Security Council in 1954, his job was to approve various covert operations. If he needed any extra information on CIA activities, he could simply ask his old friend Allen Dulles for a direct briefing. One of the most controversial of these activities was the CIA’s MK-ULTRA (or “Manchurian Candidate”) program of mind-control research during the 1950s. This research was assisted by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. Running his own intelligence department during the war, Nelson Rockefeller had been absent from the ranks of OSS and indeed had formed a lifelong enmity with William Donovan. But there was no prejudice against OSS veterans, who were recruited to the Rockefeller Foundation in droves. In 1950, OSS-er Charles B. Fahs became head of the foundation’s division of humanities. His assistant was another OSS veteran named Chadbourne Gilpatric, who arrived there directly from the CIA. (120-21)

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) played no small role in the rise of one of second- wave feminism’s leading lights: Gloria Steinem. Steinem crossed paths with the CIA in the fall of 1958, a time when her trajectory hardly suggested greatness. Steinem had recently returned from a scholarship trip to India (Wilford 141). During her stay in India, Steinem “had befriended Indira Gandhi and the widow of revolutionary humanist M.N. Roy” (141). Her exposure to greatness, however, had not resulted in social elevation. According to author Hugh Wilford, Steinem “was having difficulty finding a rewarding job” (141). Steinem “was reduced to sleeping on the floors of friends’ apartments as she hunted for work in New York” (141).

It was at this low point in Steinem’s life that Clive S. Gray entered the picture to open the doors of opportunity. Steinem had first met Gray in Delhi, “where he was ostensibly working on a doctoral dissertation about the Indian higher education system” (141). In reality, Gray was working for the CIA, “talent-spotting potential agents in the student movement” (142). Gray asked Steinem to head up the Independent Service for Information on the Vienna Youth Festival (ISI), which Wilford describes as “a major CIA-financed student enterprise launched in 1957 with the aim of rescuing Third World youth from the clutches of communist propagandists” (141). Gray and the other founders of the ISI were former NSA officers who hoped to influence the impressionable, young minds of attendees of the Vienna World Festival of Youth and Students, an event planned by KGB head and former student leader Alexander Sheljepin (141-142). According to Wilford, Gray’s proposal was too good for Steinem to refuse:

The suggestion immediately appealed to Steinem, not just because it meant paid work but because it also offered an outlet for the political idealism awakened in her by her Indian experiences, and soon after the call from Gray she met in New York with another former NSA president turned CIA officer, Harry Lunn (who, like most other young men of her acquaintance, promptly fell in love with her). Next she traveled to Cambridge, there to be interviewed by two former NSA Vice-Presidents for International Affairs, Len Bebchick and Paul E. Sigmund, Jr., and Boston lawyer George Abrams. By January 1959, she had taken up the post of Director of the Independednt Service for Information, with offices in Harward Yard and a salary of $100 a week, plus $5 per diem “because Cambridge rents were so expensive” (a generous allowance fixed by the infatuated Lunn). (142)

Steinem was not a unwitting agent or dupe. She was quite aware of the fact that the CIA was pulling her strings. Wilford elaborates:

As for Steinem herself, she became witting when she began asking questions about the ISI’s funding, and the undercover CIA officers explained that the Boston grandees and foundations apparently subsidizing the venture were in fact pass-throughs for secret official fund. (142)

In the weeks running up to the festival, Steinem and her ISI staff sent pamphlets and fact sheets to students planning to attend (143). Aiding Steinem was Time, Inc. executive C.D. Jackson, the master of psychological warfare “who secretly volunteered to coordinate a massive antifestival propaganda campaign on the CIA’s behalf, involving Radio Free Europe, Time reporters, and Austrian cabinet ministers” (143). When CBS canceled plans for a one-hour documentary on the festival, Jackson came to Steinem’s aid, attempting to convince CBS president Frank Stanton to reconsider (143). Jackson was very successful in raising support for ISI efforts at the festival (143-144).

Many left-wing researchers have portrayed the CIA as a collection of arch-conservatives that teeters on fascism. Steinem’s relationship with the CIA, however, paints a different picture. When speaking to the Washington Post concerning her relationship with the CIA, Steinem stated, “In my experience the Agency was completely different from its image; it was liberal, non violent, and honorable” (147). Speaking about the Vienna Youth Festival, Steinem told the New York Times, “I was happy to find some liberals in government in those days who were farsighted and cared enough to get Americans of all political views to the festival” (147). Steinem apparently saw little difference between her radical message and the beliefs held by many within the CIA’s ranks. While anti-Soviet, the CIA was not necessarily opposed to radical and revolutionary ideas. The Agency’s close collaboration with Steinem clearly illustrates this point. It did not seem to alarm the CIA in the least that Steinem was seeking to dismantle traditional marriage and the nuclear family. The Agency did not seem to mind if people were radicalized, so long as it controlled that radicalization campaign and selected the revolutionary doctrine that would be disseminated.

The CIA may have developed a radical pedigree that even included an entertainment of Marxist ideas. This pedigree began to develop with the CIA’s precursor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). General William “Wild Bill” Donovan, the head of the OSS, was not opposed to employing communists (Smith 9). Donovan justified the employment of communists by invoking the threat of the Axis powers (9). An Allied victory, contended Donovan, had to be secured at all costs. For Donovan, concerns over communist subversion had to be subordinated to the larger goal of winning the Second World War. Donovan even told an OSS assistant, “I’d put Stalin on the OSS payroll if I thought it would help us defeat Hitler” (9). The result of this thinking was an OSS that was “very tolerant of the political left” (9). Strategic and sensitive positions in the wartime intelligence agency were not off limits to communists or Marxists. Author Richard Harris Smith elaborates:

One ex-Communist of an earlier vintage correctly stated: “In the Office of Strategic Services… employment of pro-Communists was approved at very high levels provided that they were suited for specific jobs.” OSS often welcomed the services of Marxist enthusiasts, so long as they made no attempt to conceal their political affiliations. (9)

Donovan not only winked at the communist affiliations of OSS employees; he actively sought out communists for recruitment and employment. At one point, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) “triumphantly presented the general with dossiers of three OSS employees with Communist Party affiliations and demanded their ouster from the organization” (9). In response to the evidence presented by the FBI, Donovan stated, “I know they’re Communists; that’s why I hired them” (9). Following the end of the Second World War, the OSS morphed into the CIA.

Given its revolutionary and radical pedigree, it is not at all surprising that the Agency employed Steinem, a radical feminist activist who portrayed morality and traditionalism as machinations of male oppression. While both the CIA and Steinem were opposed to the Soviet Union, neither was necessarily opposed to Marxism. Like the CIA she served, Steinem embraced Marxist concepts and ideas. Steinem even admitted that her opposition to Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy’s anti-communist crusade prompted her to adopt Marxism (Mitchell 130). Cultural Marxism was a major element of the social engineering campaign carried out by the Rockefellers, the CIA, and Steinem.

Steinem’s choice of allies is especially ironic in light of the misogyny endemic to the Establishment. The Rockefellers, for instance, could hardly be characterized as particularly sympathetic to the plight of modern women. If the remarks of Nicholas Rockefeller to Russo were truly uttered, then it becomes painfully apparent that the oligarchical dynasty’s motives for financing the rise of feminism was purely pragmatic. Moreover, feminism was birthed from the womb of a misogynistic outlook, a paradoxical reality underscored by the movement’s Gnostic inspirations. Recall that, according to Gnostic creatology, the human race has a female Aeon (Sophia) to thank for its collective dilemma. The defective consciousness that supposedly presides over the intrinsically corrupt physical cosmos emanated from her own being. Such a creatology is hardly flattering towards women. This misogyny is explicitly expressed by the Gnostic revision of Christ in the pseudepigraphicalGospel of Thomas: Simon Peter said to all the other disciples, ‘”Let Mary Magdalene go out from among us because women are not worthy of life.” Jesus said, “See, behold, I will lead her so that I can make her a male; so that she, too, by becoming male can become a living spirit resembling you males. For every women who makes herself a male will enter the Kingdom of Heaven.”

So, feminism originated with a misogynistic heresy. There can be little wonder why this inherently misandric ideology shares so much in common with the misogynistic order it ostensibly opposes. Ultimately, the hegemony sought by the oligarchical interests of the Establishment is not gender-specific. Androgyny stipulates not only the destruction of masculinity, but of femininity as well. In this sense, misandry and misogyny are merely interim outlooks that invariably segue into androgyny. Neither one emphasizes the complimentary dynamic function served by the other. Instead, both seek primacy. The dialectical tension between the two is intended to gradually undermine gender as a defining determinant of human identity. Because identity is inextricably linked to gender, it must be abolished. After all, serfs have no need for personal identities. The world order being enshrined by the deviant elite will be populated by neither males or females. In the end, if the deviant elite realize their eschatological vision for the world, it will be populated by the new inhuman race.

FEMINISM; HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for woman's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them. Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Rockefeller and Rothschild created feminism to poison male- female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God. "Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality. (less)

EQUALITY

What do the founders of Communism and class warfare really think about social equality? "When our kingdom comes [it will be] essential [to teach that] the structure of human life requires division of labor and consequently the division of men into classes and conditions...owing in the difference in the objects of human activity there cannot be any equality..." (124) Similarly, feminism is not about giving power to women but actually taking it away. Woman's real power lies in sexual surrender, which they exchange for love (marriage). The Luciferians propose that women should indulge in sex without love. Albert Pike, the leader of 19th Freemasonry advised his fellow masons: "Woman fetters thee by thy desires; we say to the adept, ...use women often and without passion; thou wilt thus become master of thy passions and thou wilt enchain woman." (Occult Theocracy, p.234) According to Lyndon Larouche, "reducing sexual practises to the level of bestiality is a crucial feature of Satanism in all historical periods..."

COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, LIBERALISM, FEMINISM

Similarly the bankers have financed intellectuals and politicians to promote a mania for "senseless utopian principles" like "collectivism," "freedom of conscience, equality and the like." (182) They are designed to bring down the Old Order but will have no place in the New. "We have set them on the hobbyhorse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of collectivism...They have never yet and they never will reflect that this hobbyhorse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality..." (159)

"The purely brute mind of the goyim is incapable of analysis and observation and still more of foreseeing whither a certain matter of settling a question may trend...Their eyes are open but see nothing before them..." (160)

"Everything in this world is in a state of submission, if not to man, then to ... what is stronger. And so shall we be this something stronger for the sake of good." (163)

INSIGHTS

Rosenthal says the "Jews" have built an earthly empire partly by rejecting Christ's vision of a spiritual kingdom based on brotherly love. Jewish bankers plan to govern the world from Jerusalem according to their own interests.

He says the Jewish religion is essentially a disguise for a racial imperative. "We can live among other people and states [by] persuading them that the Jews are not a distinct people but the representatives of a religious faith..." "Jewish" power was created through control of the monetary system. "Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we extend book credit which we create from nothing to all local banks ...[Thus] we bring industry, management and labour into our debt...and pit management against labour so they will never unite and attack us and usher in a debt-free industrial utopia." Through control of banking, the "Jews" acquired a total monopoly of, "the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media...we took over the publication of all school materials... Even your music! We censor the songs released for publication long before they reach the publishers...we will have complete control of your thinking." He boasts that they even implanted a "guilt complex" over the Holocaust and anti Semitism that prevents society from addressing the problem. "We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eyes fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse." Rosenthal avers that society can only escape this death clutch by violent action not education. "History has been written in blood, not with ink. No letter, editorial or book has ever rallied the people or stopped tyranny. We understand this principle and are forever propagandizing the people to write letters to the President, to Congress...Woe be unto us if they ever see the futility of it, lay down the pen and employ the sword." But Rosenthal is not worried. Alluding to the promotion of feminism and homosexuality, he says: "We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its manhood exists only in combination with a feminine outward appearance. Being so neutered, the populace has become docile and easily ruled. As all geldings...their thoughts are not involved with the concerns of the future and their posterity, but only with the present and with the next meal." Rosenthal talks about how a "Jewish" invisible government also controls the USSR, and how the UN is "nothing but a trap door to the Red World's immense concentration camp." He says this invisible power is responsible for the wars and revolutions of the last 200 years.

At times the interview seems almost too damning, and we wonder if it is authentic. Why would someone who says he aspires to national prominence allow such an interview to be taped? Couldn't he be blackmailed? He makes many unflattering and untrue generalizations about Jews, which also seems implausible. At times he veers widely from arrogance to insecurity. At one point, he says Jews have made plans to pack up and flee.

Ultimately you will make up your own mind. I believe the contradictions are due to self-hatred and a subconscious desire for expiation. The interview contains many insights only an insider could have, for eg. the references to Lucifer, religion/race and violent change. They are consistent with my information.

The tone of racial arrogance also rings true. Rosenthal expresses incredulity at the spinelessness and gullibility of the American people. He says a Jew remains a Jew whether he converts to another religion or not. I doubt if a Christian Conservative like Walter White would pull off the kind of stunt he condemns "the Jews" for doing.

HOW THE ILLUMINATI CONTROL CULTURE HOW THE ILLUMINATI CONTROL CULTURE

(BELOW, CLAY FELKER IN 1967. FOUNDER OF NEW YORK AND EDITOR OF

ESQUIRE AND MANY OTHER POPULAR MAGAZINES, FELKER WAS ONE OF

SOME 600 US JOURNALISTS SECRETLY WORKING FOR THE CIA. THEY

WERE “CHEAPER THAN A GOOD CALL GIRL” ACCORDING TO CIA

HANDLER, WASHINGTON POST PUBLISHER PHILLIP GRAHAM.)

A PERVASIVE SYSTEM DIVERTS US FROM THE TRUTH AND PLACES US IN A CULTURAL LIMBO WHERE VERY LITTLE IS REAL.

“THE CIA ACTIVELY PROMOTED MODERN ABSTRACT ART, AN ART DISCONNECTED FROM HUMAN IDENTITY AND ASPIRATIONS, AN ART ANY CHILD OR MONKEY COULD PRODUCE.” “We have already contrived to possess the minds of the goy communities…[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses.” (Protocols of Zion, 12)

“No one is more a slave than he who thinks he is free without being free.” (Goethe)

BY HENRY MAKOW PH.D.

(SLIGHTLY REVISED FROM DEC 10, 2011)

W. Eugene Groves was an idealistic young American who wanted to serve his country.

After winning a Rhodes Scholarship, he was a shoo-in to lead the National Student’s Association in 1966. But, the outgoing President Philip Sherburne, let Groves in on a secret: The NSA was secretly funded by the CIA.

Until this point, Groves had been an “unwitting” member, a dupe. But as President, of course he would have to know the truth. He would need to become a “witting” participant.

During the Cold War, the CIA secretly funded and controlled scores of US student, labor, religious, political and artistic organizations, according to the book “The Mighty Wurlitzer” (2008) by Hugh Wilford.

They were modeled after Soviet propagandist Willi Munzenberg’s “Popular Front” organizations which had recruited earnest Westerners (Socialists and Liberals) in an array of “anti Fascist” causes. These seemingly spontaneous groups were secretly funded and run by Moscow (through the CPUSA) and subtly promoted Communism. Munzenberg called them his “innocents’ clubs.” IT’S NOT UNUSUAL THAT THE CIA WOULD IMITATE COMINTERN’S TACTICS. Behind the veil, both serve the Cabalist Jewish central bankers and their Masonic network which has now subverted all significant private and public institutions in the West.

So while Hugh Walford suggests that the CIA was fostering an “anti-Communist” Left, in fact it was controlling the post-war dialogue, fostering the illusion that the Cold War was real, and promoting a specific collectivist mentality.

The Russians told a familiar joke: “Under Capitalism, man exploits man while under Communism, it’s the other way round.”

(2008 BOOK “THE MIGHTY WURLITZER” DESCRIBES HOW ILLUMINATI

BANKERS “PLAYED” AMERICA)

AS WE ARE DISCOVERING, THERE ISN’T MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MONOPOLY CAPITALISM AND COMMUNISM. Under Communism, the State owns the corporations and the Illuminati bankers own the State. Under monopoly capitalism, the corporations own the State, and the bankers own the corporations.

BOTH ARE DEVOTED TO GIVING THE SATANIST BANKERS A TOTAL POLITICAL, CULTURAL, ECONOMIC AND SPIRITUAL MONOPOLY, I.E. THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS, IN THE WEST, THERE IS AN ILLUSION OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY.

“Witting” servants of the Illuminati bankers are chosen to lead governments and organizations, while unwitting dupes perpetuate the illusion of a free society. The masses are also unwitting dupes kept in a coma by the education system and mass media.

Eugene Groves’ dilemma was resolved when Ramparts Magazine and the New York Times exposed the CIA’s student program. Now you ask, why would the controlled expose the controllers? Well sometimes the dupes throw a monkey wrench into the works. Ultimately, anything that discredited the CIA and the USA was also grist for the Illuminati mill. They work both sides against the middle. But you will never see the New York Times attack central banking.

Groves oversaw the student association’s transition to independence and then quit. “The world has lost its innocence,” he said.” I wanted to get out.” (Wolford, 5)

KULTURE

How do we know what we know? We are taught by the mass media and the education system. But what if they were subverted by a satanic secret society, i.e. the Illuminati? (i.e. Cabalist Judaism and Freemasonry.)

“MODERNISM” MIRRORS A GRADUAL PERVERSION OF REALITY AND MORALITY BY THE ILLUMINATI BANKERS. WHAT WE REGARD AS “PROGRESS” IS REALLY THE ADVANCE OF THEIR SATANIST AGENDA. IT IS THE CHANGE IN “CHANGING THE

WORLD.” The mass media and education system promote this suspension of reality. Truth is suppressed. Lies are promulgated. Negative or self-destructive behavior is portrayed in a positive light.

Modernism is a solipsism where the bankers’ perversity becomes the norm. For example, the CIA actively promoted modern abstract art, an art disconnected from human identity and aspirations, an art any child or monkey could produce.

They financed the cultural magazines, (Encounter, Partisan Review) critics (Clement Greenberg) and art museums through a network of foundations and Illuminati millionaires like Nelson Rockefeller and John Hay Whitney.

“Many of the artists in the movement had radical backgrounds (Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko and Franz Kline for example…) Their painting, with its gestural expression of the artist’s consciousness and total rejection of representation, constituted a massive rebuke to…Soviet art..” (p.106)

Not really. While pretending to reject socialist realism, the CIA advanced the Communist agenda which is to make art discordant, irrelevant and ugly. The same story can be applied to modern literature where the “anti-hero,” i.e. the alienated outsider and misfit, (i.e. the Illuminati Jew) becomes the hero. The “hero” is not the community-builder but the Luciferian rebel, the destroyer in the Cabalist doctrine. Similarly, modern literary criticism is a linguistic voodoo divorced from the author’s social reality, biography or intention. Literature was treated like a self-contained artifact. Isolated words or sentences were analyzed like holy writ. This criticism was orthodoxy when I went to university. I wondered why this placebo was presented as “truth.” Now I know.

The same story can be repeated for music, TV and movies. These have convinced everyone that the fertile young female is a Goddess, and romantic love and sex are panaceas and the purpose of life. (How would a pagan sex cult differ?)

With folks thus distracted, perverts and traitors are inserted into all positions of leadership. Just look at all the logos with swooshes (sunrises), dots, pyramids (triangles) or combinations of the three. They are everywhere. Guess what? While we were sleeping, a satanic cult took over. For art to be relevant, it would have to address this occult cancer eating society. (ABOVE AND BELOW TO THE LEFT, CIA SOCIAL ENGINEER, GLORIA

STEINEM) FEMINISM Second-wave feminism was another Illuminati sponsored “popular front” masquerading as grass roots expression. Gloria Steinem, a Jewish misfit from a broken home was chosen to lead it. Clay Felker, who in the 1950’s worked with Steinem at the CIA’s “Independent Research Bureau,” (another student front,) orchestrated the media campaign. Apparently Felker was not Jewish. In 1968, Felker hired Steinem at New York magazine. He published the 40-page inaugural issue ofMS Magazine as a supplement in New York. In 1975, Redstockings, a radical feminist magazine, exposed Steinem’s CIA connections. They revealed that MS Magazine was funded by Warner Communications and Katherine Graham, both CIA conduits. In 1979, when Redstockings tried to put this account into a book, the publisher Random House was pressured to delete it by these conduits and feminism funders, the Ford Foundation. They made feminism look like a spontaneous grassroots movement, natural social change instead of elite social engineering. At the same time, authors like myself who promote heterosexuality self-publish and are ignored in the mass media. Thus kulture is contrived. (see also Kerry Bolton, Revolution from Above, p.168) CONCLUSION

The Cabalist bankers have subverted our political and social institutions and are using government to enslave us according to the blueprint of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The people of the world and even their governments will be “as children under-age,” sayThe Protocols. (15)

There have always been two kinds of Jews: those who follow the Lawgiver Moses on the one hand; and the Baal Worshipers on the other. Unfortunately, the latter have prevailed while retaining the prestige of the former. And they have been joined by traitors from every background, willing to betray their fellow man for personal profit.

Throughout history, these Luciferians have waged a war against God, the inherent spiritual and natural design. They have sought to dethrone God and enslave humanity, and are very close to succeeding. This is the true esoteric meaning of “revolution.”

A large part of this involves destroying the four sources of our human identity and meaning: race, religion (God), nation and family (gender.) They do this by creating one race, one religion, one gender and one world government. At the same time, our kulture is increasingly rootless, depraved and meaningless.

Even bacteria have culture. True culture is the quest to express and realize universal spiritual ideals like Truth, Justice and Beauty, i.e. God. When God is denied, man goes in the other direction: depravity, i.e. what passes for culture today.

FEMINISM Poisonous ideologies

"Family life was and always will be the foundation of any civilization. Destroy the family and you destroy the country."--- ERIN PIZZEY "Feminism is Communist both in origin and spirit. It pretends to champion women but in fact neuters both sexes and destroys the basic social unit, the family."-- Henry Makow Ph.D. 'The primary requirement of a pedophile is that the protective biological father is removed from the family. This is Feminism's primary aim. Feminism is a cover for pedophilia.' ~ Greg Hallett

[The Illuminati conspiracy to destroy the family, based around the Covert Hostility (1.1) Tone scale. Designed by Psychopaths. Misandry.] See: Sexualizing children Dr. Judith Reisman The Family Misandry Homosexuality Statism Communism Fascism

Quotes by Feminists Feminism Quotes

8 Reasons Men Fall In Love With Good Girls

Critics Erin Pizzey Henry Makow Ph.D.

Feminists Dr Katherine Rake Betty Friedan Gloria Steinem Alice Walker Harman, Harriet

Pedophilia PIE Harman, Harriet

Articles [2013] Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage

Why the Middle Class Can't Survive the Female-Headed Household

[2012 May] The Hidden Knowledge of Heterosexuality By Henry Makow Ph.D.

[2011 May] Daughter of a Feminist Speaks Out

[2011 March] The land that feminism forgot: They wouldn't dream of working full- time, spend three hours a day drinking coffee and their men pay for everything - have Dutch women found the secret to happiness? [2009 Dec] Dr Katherine Rake: The feminist who derides the nuclear family

BLACK FEMINISM, THE CIA AND GLORIA STEINEM. (Fwd: For you that blames black men for everything.)

[2003] BLACK FEMINISM, THE CIA AND GLORIA STEINEM.

[2009 Dec] ROSA MONCKTON: Dr Rake should live on a sink estate for a year

[2009 Feb] As a successful playwright this woman should have the world at her feet. So why, at 36, does she feel bitterly unfulfilled?

[2009 Sept] Why I loathe feminism... and believe it will ultimately destroy the family By Erin Pizzey

[2008] Erin Pizzey, champion of women's rights, says radical feminist plans to let victims of domestic abuse get away with murder are an affront to morality

[2008] How my mother's fanatical views tore us apart [2008] The day feminist icon Alice Walker resigned as my mother

[2001] From The Personal To The Political by Erin Pizzey

THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY by ERIN PIZZEY

Why does Harriet Harman hate marriage?

Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled the women's liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.

Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution By Henry Makow Ph.D. 2003 Betty Friedan: "Mommy" was a Commie By Henry Makow Ph.D. 2003 Gloria Steinem: How the CIA Used Feminism to Destabilize Society By Henry Makow Ph.D. 2002 The Devil's Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda By Henry Makow Ph.D Feb 2002 Feminism, New World Order and Rockefeller's New War By Henry Makow Ph.D. Feb 2002 How I became a Mensch: After Feminism Stole my Identity By Henry Makow Ph.D 2001 The CIA, Homosexuality and Underdevelopment By Henry Makow Ph.D. 2002

[2001] The Russian Effort To Abolish Marriage

[vid] Gloria Steinem Exposed: Feminist Spy for The CIA!

Feminism Was Created To Destabilize Society

External Marxism And The Roots Of Radical Feminism: A Series Of Essays by Carey Roberts

The Garbage Generation By Daniel Amneus

[1913] THE FRAUD OF FEMINISM BY E. BELFORT BAX

[Book] Families And Marriage

Gloria Steinem Triangle

Harman, Harriet Clegg, Nick Miliband, Ed

OCTOBER 16, 2015 GOOD FOR YOU MAN – SAYING NO TO COMMUNIST FEMINISM

MAY 24, 2014 FEMINISM – A CRUEL ILLUMINATI PSY-OP ON WOMEN

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 FEMINIST DUPES IGNORE BILL CLINTON’S HISTORY OF RAPE

NOVEMBER 12, 2015 FEMINISTS-TRAITORS TO SOCIETY

NOVEMBER 10, 2015 LIBERAL JEWS, SEX & THE NEW SATANIC ORDER

NOVEMBER 8, 2015 “JEWS ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS”- E. MICHAEL JONES

OCTOBER 15, 2015 ELOQUENT NEW VOICE SOUNDS ALARM

OCTOBER 4, 2015 WHY THE BANKERS LOVE THE LEFT

AUGUST 30, 2015 THE SATANIC CULT THAT RULES THE WORLD

AUGUST 25, 2015 WHY DO PEOPLE HATE JEWS ?

JULY 23, 2015 ILLUMINATI USE PORN TO WAGE WAR ON SOCIETY

JULY 3, 2015 THE FRAUD THAT BEGETS ALL OTHERS

JUNE 22, 2015 PAUL ELAM –FALSE PROPHET OR FALSE OPPOSITION?

JUNE 22, 2015 THE HIDDEN KNOWLEDGE OF HETEROSEXUALITY

JUNE 5, 2015 BRUCE JENNER’S JEWISH ENABLERS

JUNE 5, 2015 HENRY H. KLEIN – JEWISH ANTI- ZIONIST MARTYR

MAY 20, 2015 THE HOAX OF FEMALE EMPOWERMENT

MAY 15, 2015 THE FEMINSIM PSY-OP

MAY 1, 2015 THE DYING ART OF FEMININITY

APRIL 29, 2015 MEN’S ACTIVISTS DEAF & BLIND TO ILLUMINATI AGENDA

APRIL 25, 2015 ILLUMINATI PERSECUTE HETEROSEXUALS

APRIL 21, 2015 THE “QUIET WAR” AGAINST HUMANITY (ENCORE)

APRIL 13, 2015 BETTY FRIEDAN: HOW JEWISH DYSFUNCTION BECAME UNIVERSAL

MARCH 23, 2015 RACISM: WHAT’S GOOD FOR JEWS IS GOOD FOR GOYIM

MARCH 10, 2015 ATTACK ON HETEROSEXUALITY IS SATANISM

MARCH 9, 2015 SOCIETY BLIND TO PSY WAR ON HETEROSEXUALS

MARCH 8, 2015 “WOMEN’S DAY” IS OLD SOVIET PROPAGANDA PLOY

MARCH 4, 2015 WHAT IS PERVERSION?

FEBRUARY 25, 2015 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HYSTERIA IS POLITICAL

FEBRUARY 24, 2015 CENTRAL BANK SCAM EXPLAINS WORLD MALAISE POSTS NAVIGATION FEMINISM – A CRUEL ILLUMINATI PSY-OP ON WOMEN

May 24, 2014 • Smoloko

Thanks to feminism and the Illuminati media, more than ever young women are sexual commodities. Been to the mall lately? Yoga tights don’t leave much to the imagination.

What do women want? They want to be loved. Society is telling them that giving their bodies to strangers is how to get love. They have been inducted into a satanic sex cult.

Men are repelled by promiscuous young women. Combined with draconian family law, men have less incentive than ever to marry. The goal of Illuminism (i.e. Communism) always has been to destroy the institutions of marriage and family. They are succeeding.

It’s ironic that when rock stars are tortured and abused, and cry for help, they are ignored.

And when a whole generation of women is being mentally abducted, this is ignored too. Truly, like Miley Cyrus, we are “tongue tied” — satanically possessed. –

Continue reading and see more at: http://henrymakow.com/#sthash.z1XnO7yo.dpuf RELATED ARTICLES ON ILLUMINATI SPONSORED FEMINISM –

How the Rockefellers and CIA re-engineered women http://www.savethemales.ca/001904.html When Love is a one night stand http://www.savethemales.ca/000585.html The Devil’s Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda http://henrymakow.com/200202.html For more information and articles on feminism, please feel free to message us here at Smoloko

Illuminati:The Devil’s Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda

Forget the freebies, it's based on hate of men and controlling them at all costs. It's fascistic. Rich men love feminism. Too bad it was Rush who first used the term "feminazi". It was accurate but devalued coming from a women firster like Rush. -- Tom Smith, soc.men Wherein I endeavour to show that feminism has long been a conspiracy of the elites to destroy the political body of the common man. Feminism is the tools of the ruling elite. Look at the Pankhurst woman (I forget which one). She is credited with being a genius for gaining publicity and handling the media, but she exhibited this skill only in feminism's cause. When she turned her attentions from suffragism to anti-imperialism (the postwar asset stripping of Eritrea) she got nowhere, because she was no longer serving the interests of the elite.

WEISHAUPT: BAVARIAN ILLUMINATED

But the use of feminism by the elite goes back far further. As "Minos", one of the original Bavarian Illuminati says in a original Illuminati document:

We cannot improve the world without improving women, who have such a mighty influence on the men. But how shall we get hold of them? ... We must begin with grown girls ... It may immediately be a very pretty Society, under the management of Ptolemy's wife, but really under his management. -- 'Minos' (an Illuminati pseudonym the owner of which has never been established As quotes in "Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe" by Professor Robison, a sentimental feminism - as E Belfort Bax would put it - himself.

Minos planned to set up what he called a "Minerval School" amongst women, headed by one "Ptolemy Magus", probably another unidentified Illuminati pseudonym.

Weishaupt ("Spartacus", head of the Illuminati) obviously had a great understanding the female mind:

You must contrive pretty degrees, and dresses, and ornaments, and elegant and decent rituals. No man must be admitted. This will make them become more keen, and they will go much farther than if we were present, or than if they thought that we knew of their proceedings. Leave them to the scope of their own fancies, and they will soon invent mysteries which will put us to the blush, and create an enthusiasm which we can never equal. They will be our great apostles. However Spartacus hesistated to enact this Grand Plan, because women don't have the patience and perseverance necessary and, more importantly, can't keep the mouthes shut. Also: Nay there is a risk that they may take it into their heads to give things an opposite turn, and then, by voluptuous allurements, heightened by affected modesty and decency, which give them an irresistible empire over the best men, they may turn our Order upside down, and in their turn will lead the new one. However it was still part of the road to power: There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration. Master psychlogist, that evildoer.

UNITED MATRONS: UNICEF

Don't read "Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe", though. The sentimental feminist attitude of large parts of it are sickening. I prefer Hitler's remarks about women in trousers. Read Mein Kampf. However, if you must read it (most of it is very educational about the method of world control) skip the last quarter or so.

The NWO is already here and national sovereignty in meaningless if your country is controlled by the elite.

I've never accepted that the UN is part of the conspiracy, as many conspiracy theorists think it is. Of course the Security Council is controlled by the five permaent members and whoever (the US) can bribe the other members. Similarly most of the executive bodies are CIA controlled and the peace keepers are generally bloodthirsty gun toting psychopaths, as the current peace keeping mission in the Congo (helping the government's reconquest of insufficeintly submissive provinces and elimination of troublemakers), but some UN aganecies have done some good things. Not the eradication of smallpox by the WHO, That was mostly caused by a decline in the effectiveness of the disease and a growth in immunity amongst the surviving populations of humans. Nonetheless UNICEF under Jim Grant tried to make the world a better place for children. However when Carol Bellamy took over UNICEF it became a very different organisation.

One website says:

Breastfeeding is known to be healthier and safer than bottle feeding, especially in low-income areas of the world where sanitation is poor. But the feminists charged the UNICEF breastfeeding program portrayed women "as the human equivalent of milking cows." So no more of "breast is best."

Bellamy advocated favoring girls over boys, a practice the United Nations euphemistically refers to as "positive discrimination." She pushed through her pet Go Girls! program, which ignored the fact that in some parts of the world, the schooling of boys lags behind girls.

At an April 3, 2003 press conference, a hyper-inflated Carol Bellamy issued this chauvinistic claim: "Women are the lifeline of these southern African communities. They put food on the table, and they're the ones that keep families going during such crises."

This statement was given in a speech about the impact of AIDs, reminds me of the old Pankhurst idea that VD is biological warfare by men against women (they held placards saying "Votes for Women, Chastity for Men"). (This is also indicative of the typical female love for sexual violence.)

This is the rationale behind so-called micro-loans, whereby feminist "charitable" organisations help to mire the third world in debt by giving very small loans, still a lot of money to a third worlder, the idea really behind this is to enslave the third wolrd and to give what little capital is available, and hence economic power, into the hands of women who will frivolously spend it instead of investing it in economically wise directions, in farming equipment and so on. They want to drive a wedge between the men and women of the third world and destroy the (patriarchal) structure of traditional third world societies. The same goes for divorce settlements in the first world.

UNICEF now supports abortion, not the survival of children, its old mandate. All our work for development — from agriculture to health....must focus on the needs and priorities of women -- Ms. Frechette Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations Why do women have longer lives? Poorer health care for men, less murder and death in war for women and the life-shortening effects of psychological impotence in such an unjust society. However, eunuchs, despite all this, live 13 years longer than other men, on the average.

When Blair first appointed a Minister of Children one of her (of course it was a woman) first actions was to defend mothers who abuse their children, saying they shouldn't be sent to jail, because of course, a child needs its mother. Even an abusive or neglectful one, apparently.

FREEDOMS AND FEMINISM

Don't expect feminists to respect free speech. I think it was Naomi Wolf who was interviewed by Ali G a few years ago for the television series Ali G in the USAiii, a comedy show featuring a spoof pretend black man, played by Sascha Baron Cohen (a Jew). Ali G made fun of the people he interviewed, most of whom were apparently quite well known in America, but all of them took it quite well, except for the feminist who tried to have him silenced. Always the way.

Look at the origin of alt.feminism and soc.men, both formed out of resistance to feminist censorship.

Feminism is ALWAYS the tool of Fascism.

As Henry Makow says:

I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA. Typical COINTELPRO tactics. Steinem, of course, tried to silence this information. Feminists hate our freedoms. Of speech, especially.

THE SECRETS OF GLORIA STEINEM GLORIA IN EXCELSIS:

So, again, we have Gloria Steinem, associated with the Independent Research Service, a documented CIA domestic funding conduit. We have her making statements about the "fact" that the CIA is a liberal and far-sighted organization. And we have her attempts, through attorneys and major stockholders in Ms. [magazine], to attempt to suppress the information concerning her affiliation with Independent Research Service. In addition, she's 9-years-involved with one of the Nixon/Ford administration's Assistant Attorneys General (Stanley Pottinger), this one in charge of civil rights, whose name crops up in connection with a major arms smuggling scam. So, nothing conclusive, but very interesting indeed. To be clear, the CIA is NOT pledged to the destruction of capitalism. As Mussolini said, fascism is corporatism.

Continuing to quote from Henry Makow:

Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan´s alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a "Chester Bowles Student Fellowship" to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it. India of course is a centre of world occultism, close to Tibet of the "hidden masters". Chester Bowles was US Ambassador to India. Feminism was all about replacing left wing, marxist and anti-war movements with "liberalism", feminists and that sort of thing with no real understanding of justice or interest in pursueing it, interested only in their own power.

Makow:

In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service."

[...]

Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots. Communist groups are often controlled by the CIA, tyrants get along well together, whether Capitalists or Communists ("state-capitalists" as Orwell called them).

Makow:

Ms. Magazine´s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA- connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy´s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the crème of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA. "women political prisoners", should be "female political prisoners", this is feminist grammar.

Feminism is the system in power, a despotic system, therefore it is the duty of all socialists to overthrow it.

NAZIS AND HOMINTERN

To look at homosexuality for a moment, it is partly caused by societal stress, especially overcrowding, and partly by heavy metal poisoning. A stressed pregnant woman is more likely to bring a homosexual or other deviant into the world than a healthy and happy woman. Crowding in big cities causes stress. That's why there are so many more perverts than there used to be, along with the polution and the growth of processed foods made with soya (which causes homosexuality). Also phthalates, used in cosmetics, soak through the skin and cause feminisation of foetuses, leading to homosexuality and small penises.

Feminazi in a very accurate label. Not only are the feminists like Nazis (although this alone lays me open to Godwin's law, it is true), the feminists ARE Nazis. Their leaders work for the CIA, formed by Nazis from the SS. One of their intellectual leaders, Marija Gimbutas (no longer TF BUNDY) was educated by Nazi ethnologists and simply adopted the Aryan suprmacist myth of a Golden Age lost through interbreeding with sub-Aryan (Jewish) peoples for a more modern movement: feminism, withits own myth of a non- violent matriarchal "Golden" Age before those awful patriarchal "Kurgans" came and imposed Patriarchy. In an interesting display of cognitive dissonance the Kurgans are also held up as a race of ancient matriarchalists, as a handful of Kurgan cairns have been found with both women and weapons in them.

It all traces back to a common source. It's all one conspiracy. All about power.

WAR ON THE POOR

Glenn Sacks:

Though DiFillippo is apparently too busy applauding to notice, McLaughlin’s view of the case makes little sense. The father would rather spend two months in jail than pay $1,200? The father thinks it’s better to lose his job and two months or more of wages than pay the purge factor? This dad is either broke or he sure has a strange set of priorities.

Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement data shows it’s likely the former- -two-thirds of those behind on child support nationwide earn poverty level wages; less than four percent of the national child support debt is owed by those earning $40,000 or more a year.

Shows who the enemies of feminism really are. Poor men.

I specifically like this bit of the article:

In DiFillippo’s other article, “Woman starts Web site to shame vanished dads,” she salutes activist Fadia Ward and her website www.sorryassbabydaddies.com. Ward excoriates dads and calls on her fellow sisters to publicly humiliate them, saying “our men have got to get it together…the only way to do that is to take their manhood away." Certainly there are fathers who do not come through for their children. Yet Ward, who at age 27 has had four children by four different fathers, eschews any personal fault for her own situation, claiming that none of her four births were intended. The fathers, I suppose, intended all four conceptions and births. That, at least, seems the implied argument. Not her responsibility, always the responsibility of the father, even though she has the right to an abortion and he doesn't, she therefore gets to choose for both of them whether there is any responsibility to take. The only logical pro-choice argument is to bring in Choice For Men. The typical feminist argument against this is that the difference in choice, the choice gap if you like, is an inevitable biological fact, that a man cannot choose whether ana bortion is to take place because it doesn't effect his body (although it may subject his body to 18 years of forced labour and payments based on potential income with no concordant rights) but if choice is a biological fact, surely so is responsibility and the biological facts that impart choices must impel the responsibilities that go along with that.

Sacks:

The home page of Ward’s website depicts an African-American father shouting “get outta here with all that” as his two little children cry at his feet, begging for his affection, and the children’s mother cries and holds out a baby to him. This is a terrible distortion of the lives of divorced or separated dads, many of whom struggle to remain a part of their children’s lives. Racism and sexism (against men) together, as the belong.

MURDER MOST HORRID

Take the case of David and Clara Harris. David Harris had an affair, as indeed did Clara Harris. The big difference is that Clara Harria used his affair as an excuse to kill her husband. And the media, of course, pandered to her. WorldNetDaily, right wing web rag, had an article: "Free Clara Harris". She was a woman with a history of commiting domestic violence, proven to have premeditated the murder, who had repeatedly run over a man who had commited no crime beyond seeking solace in the arms of a collegue from a violent partner while the man's daughter (her step-daughter) screamed "please don't kill my daddy" from the back seat.

As Glenn Sacks says:

It goes without saying that were the genders reversed few would be talking about infidelity as a justification for murder. Imagine a woman trapped in a loveless marriage with a jealous, potentially violent husband whom she believes may be cheating on her. She stays in the marriage because she fears she could be separated from her children should they divorce, and finds understanding, companionship and passion in a relationship with a coworker. Her husband finds out about the affair and goes on a violent, jealous rampage, slaughtering her in front of her daughter as the daughter begs him not to kill her mother. Mia Magness, for the PROSECUTION(!) said: For heaven's sakes, the man is cheating on you, you do what every other woman in this county does. Take him to the cleaners. Take his house, take his car, take his kids, take his respect in the community, and you can make him wish he were dead As said at www.fathers.ca/clara_harris1.html: Bacha exposed little known information collected by Blue Moon Investigations which indicated that Clara murdered David not out of jealousy but because he "had something on her," and that the murder of David may not have been the first one Clara was involved in. There was a lot of blaming the victim going on.

Is that Schiavo woman had been a man, she would never have been given any coverage. She was a braindead woman being allowed to die. If she'd really been alive she would have eaten and drank herself, surely easy enough for somenone capable of talking, as Schiavo's mad parents said she was. Even so her husband was demonised, despite only doing what any sane man would do.

I don't suopport euthanasia, you understand, this wasn't euthanasia, this was a woman who was already dead, nothing more than a waste of electricity, a lump of meat.

NAZI GENOCIDALISTS LIVE!

Nor do I support abortion.

As Agent Wolverine Says: (Underground Nazi Invasion of the United States Part 14)

Why is it that a person can get a life sentence if he beats a new-born child to death; yet if that same child is only partially born and it is dismembered while it's head is still in the vaginal passage -- it is merely 'partial birth abortion' and the doctor who performs the 'operation' is hailed as a hero by Faminazis like Sanger who scream raging curses at PRO- LIFERS because they are against women's 'rights' while at the same time being VERY CAREFUL not to expose their TRUE reasons for advocating abortion We could add: why is it that if a man causes a miscarriage he's tried for murder, but if a woman commits murder she's hailed as a hero by the feminists?

Agent Wolverine (Part 47):

Dr. H.G. Whittington unconsciously betrayed the Holocaust-abortion connection when he wrote that "The [abortion] counselor must help the applicant [for abortion] face a painful existential dilemma: whether to kill one nascent human being in order to enhance the quality of life of another person ... Society legalizes abortion to enhance the quality of human life." Just as the Nazis exterminated the Jews to enhance their 'quality of human life' and Lebensraum . Agent Wolverine (Part 46): H.L. Mencken, another leading American eugenicist, urged that "A resolute attack be made on the fecundity of all the males on the lowest rung of the social ladder." Only Males, of course. This shows their true aim, for the most efficient way to limit reproduction is to sterilise females, not males. So, obviously, sterilisation wasn't the only thing they were interested in.

Agent Wolverine (Part 49):

Reichsfuhrer Adolf Hitler strongly agreed with this assessment, actually incorporating Bormann's language;

"The Slavs are to work for us. Insofar as we don't need them they may die. Therefore compulsory vaccination and education are super- fluous. The fertility of the Slavs is undesirable. They may use contraceptives or practice abortion -- the more the better.

"In view of the large families of the native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. Active trade in contraceptives ought to be actually encouraged in the Eastern territories, as we could not possibly have the slightest interest in increasing the non- Germanic population."

Continuing: A short April 27, 1942 statement by Berlin population and demographics expert Professor Heinrich Wetzel (repro- duced below in its entirety) summarized the entire Nazi population control program regardless of location. Notice carefully the striking similarities this program has to the one that has been implemented in the United States by pro-abortion groups.

"Every propaganda means, especially the press, radio and movies, as well as pamphlets, booklets, and lectures, must be used to instill in the Russian population the idea that it is harmful to have several children. We must emphasize the expenses that children cause, the good things that people could have had with the money spent on them. We could also hint at the dangerous effect of childbearing on a woman's health.

"Paralleling such propaganda, a large-scale campaign would be launched in favor of contraceptive devices. A contraceptive industry must be established. Neither the circulation and sale of contraceptives nor abortions must be prosecuted.

"It will even be necessary to open special institutions for abortion, and to train midwives and nurses for this purpose. The population will practice abortion all the more willingly if these institutions are competently operated. The doctors must be able to help out, in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. Voluntary sterilization must also be recommended by propaganda."

By this time, the Nazis recognized that personal and professional consciences were often deeply troubled by the practice of widespread and easily- available abortion. Heinrich Himmler soothed these troubled consciences by issuing a decree in March of 1943 that is remarkably similar to those promulgated by our own American Medical Association; "The Russian physicians or the Russian Medical Association, which must not be informed of this order, are to be told in individual cases that the pregnancy is being interrupted for reasons of social distress."

The Nazis also introduced gas chambers and ovens because they were concerned about the effect shooting many unarmed Jews would have on the SS men. "Any excuse will serve a tyrant." -- Aesop. From Cosmic Conflict Volume Two (CRIM-RAM) by Branton: Greg Keath, in his article 'Abortion is not a Civil Right', which appeared in the Sept. 27, 1989 issue of the WALL STREET JOURNAL, stated: "...many blacks wonder whether black civil rights and abortion fit so neatly together (For every three black babies born, two are aborted. 43 percent of all abortions in the United States are performed on black women. From figures supplied by the federal government and the Alan Guttmacher Institute, Richard D. Glasow of National Right to Life has estimated that some 400,000 black pregnancies are aborted each year). Black pregnancies have historically been the target of SOCIAL ENGINEERS such as Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger was convinced that blacks, Jews, Eastern Europeans, and other non-Aryan groups were detracting from the creative intellect and social potential of America, and she wanted those groups' numbers REDUCED..." (see her first book, PIVOT OF CIVILIZATION) Agent Wolverine again (Part 2): Pro-abortion activist-leader and 'Planned Parenthood' founder Margaret Sanger betrays her own devotion to the Globalist genocidal policies and insensitivity to women's rights, especially NON-ARYAN women's rights -- not to mention the constitutional rights to 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' on the part of untold millions of children -- in the following words from her first book 'PIVOT OF CIVILIZATION'. In reference to free MATERNITY care for the poor she states: "Instead of DECREASING and aiming to ELIMINATE THE STOCKS that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant." And in reference to her 'Negro Project' of the late 1930's, which aimed at recruiting black ministers, physicians and political leaders for the purpose of encouraging birth control and sterilization in the black community, Sanger wrote: "...We do not want word to go out that WE WANT TO EXTERMINATE THE NEGRO POPULATION, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."] LEGAL IS MORAL: RELATIVISM STRIKES BACK

Some Nazi and abortionist quotes from Agent Wolverine's Underground Nazi Invasion fo the United States Part 48:

"The courts tell us that this is a legal "I just go by what the court says. I only do matter it is all quite legal." what's legal." -- Nuremberg defendant Walter E. -- Abortionist M. Jackson, New York City. Schmidt "The physician is merely an instrument, as in the case of an officer who receives "The physician is only the instrument of her an order." decision." -- Dr. Karl Brandt, Nuremberg Doctor -- Abortionist Bernard Nathanson, 1974. Trial, 1947. "What good does it do to humanity to "Most birth defects are not discovered until maintain artificially and rear the birth. If a child were not declared alive until thousands of cripples, deaf-mutes, and three days after birth, the doctor could allow idiots? Is it not better and more rational the child to die if the parents so choose and to cut off from the first this unavoidable save a lot of misery and suffering. I believe misery which their poor lives will bring this view is the only rational, compassionate to themselves and their families?" attitude to have." -- Dr. Ernst Haeckel, medical and -- Nobel laureate Dr. James D. Watson, biological scientist, 1904.< 1973 "The destruction of Jews is analogous to "Abortion is precisely equivalent to removing a gangrenous appendix from a operating on an appendix or removing a diseased body." gangrenous bowel." -- Nazi doctor Fritz Klein -- Dr. Alan Guttmacher, Planned Parenthood

I hope I need not go on. These are not just people of similar ideologies, remember, this is no conincidence, the feminists ARE the descendatns of Nazism, through Gimbutas, through Planned Parenthood and through the CIA.

As Agent Wolverine says:

Physicians -- not black-clad Schutzstaffel thugs -- developed the philosophy and methodology of the Nazi Holocaust. Almost all of the leading German, British, and American eugenicists admired by the leaders of the Third Reich were doctors. DOORWAY TO THE DEVIL

Let's bring theology into this:

The truth is, the feminist movement is neither modern nor social in its origin. At its roots are ancient, highly religious elements that are rarely, if ever, mentioned. From the Jeremiah Project website: At the 1998 ReImagining conference women were encouraged to express the divine reality that is locked deep within their identities by sharing their stories. Special emphasis was placed on telling stories of abuse, defilement, and repression, the kinds of stories that evoke what conference leader Rita Nakashima Brock, called "holy outrage."

[...]

Who are they really? Goddesses who have been forced into amnesia by primitive white men trying to keep them from their true potential. Feminism is in fact a spiritual movement based partly on reawakening of "goddess consciousness," and its real goal is matriarchy, not equality.

[...]

The ultimate symbol of the patriarchy is a male God - the Father. In response, feminists at the National Council of Churches pushed through a unisex version of the Bible in which God is "our father and mother in heaven." and Jesus Christ is not the "Son of God," but the "child of God." The St. Hilda Community (an offshoot of the Church of England's Movement for the Ordination of Women) are not rewriting Christian creeds, but replacing them with stuff such as, "We believe in the presence of God in the world. She is our mother, source of deep wisdom ... she is our lover and is allowed to touch our pain ... she is our friend who stands alongside us." They have rewritten the Lords Prayer (depatriarchalised as "Prayer of Jesus") which reads in part, "Beloved, our Father and Mother in whom is heaven, hallowed by your name, followed by your royal way ..."

[...]

In her book Changing of the Gods, Naomi Goldenberg predicted that the continued feminist presence in religion would force a redefinition - one that would alter the very essence of Judeo-Christian belief. Goldenberg writes:

Undoubtedly, many followers of new faiths will still cling to old labels. But a merely semantic veneer of tradition ought not to hide the fact that very nontraditional faith will be practiced ... The feminist movement in Western culture is engaged in the slow execution of Christ and Yahweh. Yet very few of the women and men now working for sexual equality within Christianity and Judaism realize the extent of their heresy. And: The 1971 Declaration of Feminism states, "All of history must be rewritten in terms of the oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft." As I recently saw a feminist post on the usenet: You can't rewrite history. That is, you can't rewrite it to the truth after they've converted it into a load of lies.

Feminism is the tool of satan to mislead the world. Women have always been, as Tertullian said, the doorway of the devil, easily led astray. http://www.jeremiahproject.com/prophecy/feminist4.html:

"Sophia, Creator God, let your milk and honey flow. Sophia, Creator god, shower us with your love...Our sweet Sophia, we are women in your image. With nectar between our thighs, we invite a lover, we birth a child; with our warm body fluids, we remind the world of its pleasure and sensations..."

Thus went the prayer offered up in their pagan service along with replacing the bread and wine of the Lord's Supper with bread, milk and honey.

I like milk as much as the next man, but this is insane. This is supposed to be a Christian gathering! Delores Williams, theology professor at New York's Union Theological Seminary, told the gathering: "I don't think we need a theory of atonement at all...Atonement has to do so much with death...I don't think we need folks hanging on crosses and blood dripping and weird stuff... We just need to listen to the god within." This is a THEOLOGY professor. What sort of theology professor at a Chrisitan Conference describes the crucifixion as "blood dripping and weird stuff"? Don't get me started on the re-imagining rubbish, with the lesbianism and dancing naked on pews. Various feminists proclaim that women are 'under siege', that a monstrous social bias against them, if not a virtual war, is going on, that women have little respect or power (Steinem, Faludi, Tavris, etc.) Yet the notion of the American woman as a powerless "victim" is one of the most absurd notions ever foisted upon anyone. American women live, on average, seven years longer than men. They control 86 % of all personal wealth [PARADE Magazine, May 27, 1990], and make up 55% of current college graduates. Women cast 54% of the votes in Presidential elections, so they can hardly claim to be left out of the political decision-making process! They win almost automatically in child custody disputes. Women suffer only 6% of the work- related fatalities (the other 94% are suffered by men). Women are the victim of only about 35% of violent crimes, and only about 25% of all murders, yet because of our society's exaggerated concern and respect for them, special legislation has been passed to punish "violence against women" as if it were a more heinous crime than "violence against men". (Feminists claim to want "equality", and this is an example of what "equality" means to them, i.e., preferential treatment to address their concerns). Two out of every three dollars spent on health care is spent on women, and even if you don't count pregnancy-related care, women still receive more medical care than men - yet feminists still holler that womens health is being "neglected", and far too many of us credulously believe them. Of the 25 worst jobs, as ranked by the Jobs Related Almanac based on a combination of salary, stress, security, and physical demands, 24 of them are predominantly, if not almost entirely, male, which might explain why men commit over 80% of all suicides. (Most of these statistics come from The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrell.) It is impossible to escape feminism.

IDEOLOGICAL WAR

From PInc (Politically Incorrect):

Nicholas Davidson aptly describes feminism as "the gender ideology of our society". It is everywhere - in politics, the law, the schools, the universities, the churches, the business world and the family. It is thus important to understand what this ideology is about and what it aims to achieve. Modern feminists like to argue that there is no one feminism, but from a perusal of the major feminist writers until the late decade of this century it is clear that there is a common core and a coherence to modern feminism that makes it an ideology, and its advocates ideologues. Such has it always been. The old feminists of the past, Hoff-Summers' equity feminists, Bax's sentimental feminists were every bit as bad as the feminists of the present days, with their VD conspiracy theories, sexist placards and terrorist attacks (the suffragettes blew up Lloyd George's house).

And let's have none of these claims that feminism is not monolithic can't be generalised about. It is not only as monolithic as any other movement, the use of a single name indicating a common identity, it is a far more rigid and united ideology than most. The name itself is objectionable, "feminism", "womanism", but those who abandon the name when this is pointed out are worse, hoping only to abjure criticism to another day. They are all based on anti-male hatred, or, at the very least, on concentrating solely on the interests of women.

A while ago the Republic of Nigeria planned to execute a woman who had commited adultery, I am against the death penalty but this was fully in accordance with the laws of their land, but they didn't execute her. Men are executed for the same crime, and in Nigeria men are executed in very large numbers, but the international community care to complain only when it is a woman who is being punished in accordance with the law.

Even fairy tales can't escape feminist spinning: http://www.pursam.org/teemings/issue04/dreamland.html Femi nists, of course, are only too familiar with fairy tales.

BIBLE WARPERS

Dr. Frank Logsdon, Committee Member, New American Standard Version (Bible):

"I must under God denounce every attachment to the New American Standard Version. I'm afraid I'm in trouble with the Lord...We laid the groundwork; I wrote the format; I helped interview some of the translators; I sat with the translator; I wrote the preface. When you see the preface to the New American Standard, those are my words...it's wrong, it's terribly wrong; it's frightfully wrong...I'm in trouble;...I can no longer ignore these criticisms I am hearing and I can't refute them. The deletions are absolutely frightening...there are so many. The finest leaders that we have today haven't gone into it [new versions of Hort and Wescott's corrupted Greek text] just as I hadn't gone into it... that's how easily one can be deceived...Are we so naive that we do not suspect Satanic deception in all of this?" The feminists and their homosexual ideological allies are destroying our literature and our spirituality because it help them destroy our minds. The homosexual perverts are an integral part of feminist strategy. So, inadvertantly are what the council calls BME, black and minority ethnics. How many times have we heard the laughably inaccurate description "white male dominated society"? It is used exclusively be feminists who wish to ride the backs of the blacks to power. Even since the abolitionists feminists have been using black issues to take power. It's a bit more difficult with other ethnicities, especially Muslims, as they tend to have beliefs not entirely in accordance with the feminist agenda. Just the other day I was reading about a remote tribe in the Chaco desert of Paraguay. Some missionaries were trying to convert them and then the feminists turned up and chased the missionaries away with their moral relativism, supporting the natives traditions or witchcraft, infanticide and extermination of the old and weak, which had all largely been stopped by the missionaries. Of course, the feminists went home at the first sign of malaria. The missionaries had been the natives' only source of medical treatment. Now only one Christian nurse supplies healthcare to an area several times the size of Belgium. Most native simply go to the witch- doctors, but the witch-doctors know better and go to the modern medical knowledge. See also Carrie Chapman Catt.

The Chairman of the New Internation Version of the Old Testament Translation Committee, Dr. Marten H Woudstra, was a homosexual. Virginia Mollenkott was also a screaming lesbite.

Look at blacktown.net, they're BMEs, Black Minority Ethnics, which is the currently politically correct term, who oppose feminism, as any sane and well informed man should.

RIDING THE BACKS OF THE BLACKS

It's all like COINTELPRO. Keep black organisations, and poor organisations like unions, from coalescing, from gaining respectability, from recruiting new members. Look how most black people live. Penned into council estates, sink estates and tower blocks with organised crime, street gangs and heroin. Fatherlessness is paticularly high amongst blacks, because blacks were seen as dangerous by the elites and were targeted by feminism. Who are the deadbeat dads? The poor, who don't pay because they can't afford to pay and can't afford solicitors to defend them. blacktown.net:

We have given Black women over 25 years to rule and be in charge. We have given them the "red carpet treatment", to do things their way. The Black family is now over 50% female headed. And the proof is the popular 1990s term: "female headed households". This popular term proves that women are in charge and that Feminists got what they wanted. But the problem is that it doesn't work. Over 70% of the Black men in jail are from female headed homes!!! Black girls are forming street gangs and going to jail at an increasing rate. And they also come from the now infamous, female headed household They make out women are the backbone of the black family, women are the bane of the black family! In Africa feminist organisations, charities, the UN, etc., all give so-called microloans SOLELY TO WOMEN, on the basis that women are more responsible spenders and will spend for the good of their families, while men will just spend it on booze, but this is really done because they know women will waste the money and get their families into further debt buying frilly dresses and posh hats.

And:

1970s FEMINISM BECAME POPULAR BECAUSE OF CORPORATE SPONSORSHIP, EPITOMIZED BY THE VIRGINIA SLIMS CIGARETTE BILLBOARDS, POSTERS, AND MAGAZINE ADVERTISEMENTS!!!!

The following ads prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what we have been saying.

Now, all the critics, cynics, and nay sayers of blacktown.net will have to shut their mouths. Thus, henceforth, blacktown.net does not plan on debating whether Women's Liberation was a conspiracy or not. We have presented mountains of obvious evidence and now rest our case!!! COURT DISMISSED!!!! blacktown.net again: Every black social revolution was started and lead by blackmen. From Marcus Garvey; To Elijah Muhammad; To Malcolm X; To Martin Luther King Jr.; To the militant Black Panthers!!! But what is stopping blackwomen from launching the next major black revolution??? NOT A DAMN THING!!! Feminism fosters injustice. Must as they love their "women and children" attitudes, they don't care at all about children. Look here.

The BBC's Panorama, 6/10/97, reported a case of a TWELVE year old boy being forcibly raped by a nineteen year old woman who then threw him from a railway bridge to shut him up. Luckily he survived, but despite admitting to rape and attempted murder she was charged only with indecent assault and spent not a single say in jail. This was for FORCIBLE as well as statutory rape, and attempted murder. Suspended sentence.

That's feminist justice.

On the other hand, all a woman has to do is make an accusation to get a man put in jail, with no possible comeback for false accusations. Indeed, the government's criminal compensations agency PAYS women to make false accusations of crime. Even if the man is found not guilty despite the presumption of guilt, having somehow done the impossible and proved consent was given, his name will still have been dragged through the mud and his accuser will still go scot-free. The accusor's name will not even be given out in the press, unlike that of the accused. blacktown.net know what's what. The role of woman is as slave master for the slave owners, the capitalists, bankers, financiers and anti-democratic elitists.

"I've never heard such crap! That isn't a conspiracy! That is the world. It is the way things are done. And quite rightly so." -- Denis Healey And that's what we've got to stop if we ever want democracy. blacktown.net:

IT'S NOW TIME TO GIVE THE CRAZY, LESBIAN, FEMINIST WITCHES A TASTE OF THEIR OWN WITCH'S BREW STEW!!

Feminism has run its course and served no significant purpose. We are indeed at the end of the Feminist era, yet Black men are afraid of making the declaration that Feminism has been a evil conspiracy just as bad as the 1960's COINTEL program of F.B.I. Director Jay Edgar Hoover, or any other documented conspiracy against Blacks.

Black men must learn how NOT to be like Adam of the Bible, or the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz, or Darren from the TV show Bewitched, or Sampson from the bible, or President Bill Clitoris. All of these men were victims of Witchcraft!!! And: IT IS LITERALLY THE OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK TO USE A WOMAN TO DESTROY A MAN, THE SAME WAY EVE WAS USED BY THE DEVIL TO DESTROY AND DISGRACE ADAM!!! As Tertullian said, woman is the doorway to the devil, each of them is an Eve.

Here's a basic and half-hearted interpretation of feminist rape law.

LABOUR HEROES

There have been two prospective Labour MPs who have been heroes, but have never been known, for they took a stand against injustice and power. I do not know their name, but they took the leadership to the European courts before the 1997 election and won, ending the Labour practice of women-only shortlists. However, Labour won that election, with a record number of female MPs, so called Blair's Babes. Labour changed the law, so now women- only shortlists are only too legal. Weep for what Blair has done to our legal system!

The number of female MPs has since gone down. Women-only shortlists were never to increase the number of female MPs, but to increase the control of consituency parties by Party HQ, so Blair could parachute his cronies into safe seats.

That's what happened in Blaenau Gwent when Peter Law opposed the plans of cntral government by standing, and winning as an independant, despite being denounced as a misogynist by the national press. A victory for localism. Even a brain tumour, conveniently arriving at almost the right time to knock him out of the election, didn't stop him wiping the floor with Labour in one of the firmest Labour seats in the country. He's dead now. Killed, no doubt, by MI6 and their cancer-inducing rays or drugs.

This is exactly how Nazi German started. We hear a lot about peak oil. We've had our peak democracy. It's all been downhill since 1948, when government caved in to the private sugar monopoly and its cartoon sugar man. And in America Peak Deomcracy was reached with the feminist coup on the CRA.

I once heard ont he radio of a pamphlet in a clinic for women who have had miscarriages. Remember, it said, that it's not only you (the mother) who has lost a child. It's your mother and mother-in-law too. No mention of the father, who's the only other who has lost a child, of course.

TWIST OF FAITH

A book on the web called Twist of Faith says:

You probably wouldn't expect to find goddesses in a conservative farming community in North Dakota. I didn't. But one day when visiting my husband's rural hometown, a neighbor told us that a new bookstore had just opened in the parsonage of the old Lutheran Church. "You should go see it," she urged.

I agreed, so I drove to a stately white church, walked to the parsonage next door, and rang the bell. The pastor's wife opened the door and led me into a large room she had changed into a bookstore, leaving me to browse. Scanning the shelves along the walls, I noticed familiar authors such as Lynn Andrews who freely blends witchcraft with Native American rituals, New Age self- empowerment, and other occult traditions to form her own spirituality.

Among the multicultural books in the children's section, one caught my attention. Called Many Faces of the Great Goddess, it was a " coloring book for all ages." Page after page sported voluptuous drawings of famed goddesses. Nude, bare-breasted, pregnant, or draped in serpents, they would surely open the minds of young artists to the lure of "sacred" sex and ancient myths.

And: "Sophia, Creator God, let your milk and honey flow. . . . Shower us with your love . . . ." chanted more than 2000 women gathered at the 1993 Re-Imagining Conference in Minnesota. "We celebrate sensual life you give us. . . . We celebrate our bodiliness. . . . the sensations of pleasure, our oneness with earth and water," continued one of the leaders. Representing main-line denomination, the women had come from the Presbyterian Church USA (about 400), the United Methodist Church (about 400), the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (313), the United Church of Christ (144), and Baptist, Episcopal, Church of the Brethren churches about (150). About 230 were Roman Catholics. To most of these worshippers, Sophia symbolized inner wisdom and "the feminine image of the Divine." Playful, permissive, and sensuous, she has "become the latest rage among progressive church women."

[...]

A worldwide sisterhood of angry, militant feminists is rising to power. The United Nations World Conference on Women in Beijing gave a glimpse of its influence. It left its leaders with marching orders designed to revolutionize our schools, homes, churches and culture. If the feminist movement gains what it demands, no one will escape its global influence. American Christians will face the kind of hatred that drove persecuted masses to our borders, but there would be no place to hide outside of Christ.

The international women's treaty effectively creates a one world state, any state stupid enough to disobey orders will be bullied into like by the World Bank and the UN.

God doesn't want feminists dancing naked on pews.

Twist of Faith:

"Not surprisingly, Sophia seemed to reserve a special blessing for lesbian love." observed Kathy Kersten, Prositution could be easily defeated, as could all crime. A bit of democracy does wonders for the eliminations of crime. industrial democracy severely lengthens life spans. The Barcelona worker's patrols during the Spanish civil war ended prostitution totally, it only came back when the communists destroyed their anarchist allies, eliminated the worker's patrols and put a traditional police force back in place instead.

EQUAL RiGHTS

Look at these survival figure for the Titanic:

First-Class Women: 97 percent First-Class Men: 34 percent Second-Class Women: 84 percent Second-Class Men: 8 percent Third-Class Women: 55 percent Third-Class Men: 12 percent More third class women survived than first class men, as you can see. So much for sexism there. So much for the third class being locked bleow decks. There are no feminists when the lifeboats are lowered. -- Per's MANifesto Mothers tend to kill boys more than they kill girls. Mothers do the majority of child abuse. Natural fathers commit only 2% of child abuse. Men are 96% of on-the-job deaths. No one complains about that sexism. Improper defence of the saftey and rights of poor men doesn't get headlines. Not does men being pressured into dangerous jobs, often the only jobs available or the only jobs well paid enough to support a family. http://www.backlash.com/content/gender/votemale/raj.html: women don't call their political action committee the National Organization for Gender Equality; they said that it was just FOR WOMEN - and I, for one, believe them. Possibly the only time I believe a feminist, but so do I. http://www.socmen.org/per/manifesto/april96.html#ovaries:

It is rare -- perhaps nonexistent -- for a man to be acquitted of criminal wrongdoing on the grounds that his wife controlled his thoughts. But Christina Hays joins the list of women acquitted or never charged because of their gender. Add her name to the list of women who have claimed the PMS Defense, post-partum depression, "battered wife syndrome," and other defenses that appeal to the concept of uniquely feminine mental defects or shortcomings. Mad feminist insanity of the Gimbutas/Nazi Ahnenerbe ilk was once accepted truth in the less scientific sciences, like archaeology. http://www.debunker.com/texts/goddess_rem.html:

"As a matter of fact, when Dames published those words in 1976, they were about seven years out of date. In 1968 and 1969 two prehistorians directed criticisms at this whole edifice of accepted scholarly belief which brought it all down for ever. One was Peter Ucko, in his monograph Anthropomorphic Figurines of Predynastic Egypt and Neolithic Crete .... Professor Ucko reminded readers that a large minority of Neolithic figurines were male or asexual, that few if any statuettes had signs of majesty or supernatural power, and that few of them had accentuated sexual characteristics (the 'pubic triangles' on many of them could be loincloths). He warned against glib interpretations of the gestures portrayed upon figures; thus, early Egyptian figurines of women holding their breasts had been taken as 'obviously' significant of maternity or fertility, but the Pyramid Texts had revealed that in Egypt this was the female sign of grief.... all over the globe clay models very similar to those of the Neolithic are made as children's dolls. Just as in the modern West, most are intended for girls and are themselves female. Another widespread use of such figures is in sympathetic magic ... there was absolutely no need to interpret them everywhere as the same female or male deity. "The second attack was made by Andrew Fleming, in an article in the periodical World Archaeology uncompromisingly entitled 'The Myth of the Mother Goddess.' He pointed out the simple fact that there was absolutely no proof that spirals, circles, and dots were symbols for eyes, that eyes, faces, and genderless figures were symbols of a female or that female figures were symbols of a goddess. This blew to pieces the accepted chain of goddess- related imagery from Anatolia round the coasts to Scandinavia. He was helped by the revolution in the carbon-dating process, which disproved the associated belief that megalithic architecture had traveled from the Levant with the cult of the Great Mother... CEDAW

Look at the oppressive role the UN and its controllers/organs, the US and World Bank, play in the CEDAW, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnLeo/2002/06/24/un_womens_r ight_treaty_should_be_ignored:

Some 167 nations have signed the treaty, many with no intention of observing it. But the CEDAW ferociously monitors every nation's compliance. It has a few enforcement mechanisms and plans more. The idea is that someday, nations may not be able to resist There's the feared one-world government. The committee enforcing CEDAW criticized Belarus for reintroducing Mother's Day ("a sex-role stereotype") and strongly urged Armenia to combat the image of "the noble role of mother." It complained that voters in Ireland seem to reflect Catholic values and warned Libya that the Quran can only be followed within "permissible" limits set by CEDAW. Feminists will decide what religions may teach.

CEDAW busybodies are always eager to intrude. Recently they leaned on Denmark for not providing data on whether Danish fathers are doing their share of chores around the house.

The world-government, keeping an eye on you and telling you what you can do. What you can believe. Composing their propaganda. One of the CEDAW committee's techniques is to use broad language, which is then tightened and given a radical interpretation after signatories have accepted it. CEDAW did not announce that women's "right to free choice of profession and employment" would turn out to mean (as the committee now says) that prostitution must be decriminalized around the world. As is actually happening in many places. More powerful countries like Britain and America will be able to hold out against the pressure for a bit longer, but traditional poor countries like Libya or Bolivia will have no more chance against CEDAW than they had against the World Bank neoliberal agenda. The World Bank now seems primed to serve as an enforcer for CEDAW. One World Bank document is titled "Integrating Gender into the World's Bank's Work: a Strategy for Action." The feminists talk about the World Bank's "accountability mechanisms." Translation: No CEDAW compliance, no loan. The Gnomes of Zurich have won. Democracy is dead, the world is run by the banks and for the banks. Worse, CEDAW backers intend to use the new International Criminal Court as an enforcement tool. Patrick Fagan of the Heritage Foundation, who follows CEDAW closely, predicts that the CEDAW committee will bring an ICC case against Catholic hospitals to break the hospitals' refusal to perform abortions. Language setting up the court is so vague that radical prosecutors and judges might be able to jail clerics who refuse to perform same-sex marriages or who decline to ordain women.

The lesson here is that small groups of dedicated bureaucrats, out of the public eye, can make rules affecting the domestic affairs of countries that would be difficult or impossible to achieve democratically. The trick is to create "customary international law" out of marginal views, constantly repeated on the world stage. Rita Joseph, an Australian human rights specialist, says: "The basic plan is ingeniously simple. The idea is to couch the feminist agenda in language of human rights" and then assert the ascendancy of human rights over the sovereign rights of nations. www.townhall.com/columnists/DavidLimbaugh/2002/09/21/cedaw_mean s_cede_law : Consider these actions by the 23-member CEDAW "enforcement" committee. In 1998, the committee requested information from Mexico "on whether homosexuality is penalized in the criminal code." In 1999, it recommended to Kyrgyzstan that "lesbianism be reconceptualized as a sexual orientation and that penalties for its practice be abolished." This year it told Trinidad and Tobago to "consider a revision of any laws which provide punishment for sexual relations between women in order to eliminate this discrimination against women."

The treaty's advocates insist it is neutral on abortion. Yet the Committee has repeatedly insinuated itself in the internal decisions of nations, tirelessly championing "abortion rights." In 1998, the Committee chastised Mexico for "the lack of access for women in all states to easy and swift abortion."

Still, I'm sure it's all for the best. If you can't trust feminists, who can you trust?

Feminists, after all are loving and caring, are they not? http://www.fathersforlife.org/male_conspiracy.htm

For millennia, probably since the invention of walking, men have happily pledged their fidelity to the most closely guarded of secrets. As part of a world-wide conspiracy, one whose sole aim is the absolute and never-ending subordination of the entire female gender, every male on the planet, every one, has promised to serve the cause faithfully and to promote its masculine interests. But I must be the first to break with the planetary tradition. I am a kind of Messiah for the New Age, and hence expect to be reviled and scorned for the tidings I bring. I must be the first for a couple of reasons. Well, the first is not so much a justifying reason, as an excusing condition. It's just that a few women, mainly sociologists, are on the verge of figuring this out for themselves. The least I can do for the brotherhood, if I am to betray it so monstrously, is to prevent a woman from making the most important discovery of the last 1.5 million years.

[...]

The first world-wide congress convened in the Falkland Islands about 30,000 BC, and has met there annually ever since (the exact date is unknown, since records were not maintained until about 3,500 BC, when the movement invented writing as we now know it). This is why Britain sent half its navy to rescue the Falklands; more than a few sheep were at stake. The Admirals and Generals, all of them men (who very cleverly brainwashed Margaret Thatcher into doing their dirty work for them), knew that the planetary male privilege was vulnerable.

I believe this to be satire.

At any rate, the real reason for the Falklands war was an underground alien base on South Georgia Island.

The Labour MP for the West Lancashire Constituency is having his seat stolen, according to Private Eye. A feminist conspiracy is seeking to remove Colin Pickthall to enforce a female-only shortlist for selection as a parliamentary candidate in that area, 18 months after Pickthall, the current MP, was democratically selected by constituency Party members. Halt these anti-democratic policies.

Halt also the all-female trains circling their globe on their inflexible iron tracks. Some are painted pink, some are covered in fluffy cushions, all are an abomination against the tax payer.

Some links.

Israeli anti-feminist links too.

It's in Ottawa that the feminist law making has gone most insane. In that beknighted locale an act of domestic violence is any act of violence between a man and a woman with a sexual relationship, the presumption is for guilt and punishment (officially protection of the victim) is meted out by police and judges, not juries. It would be perfectly possible for a prositutute, who has a sexual relationship with her client, to phone the police and have him forcibly ejected from his own home in her favour, as they're in a sexual relationship, on nothing more than her word.

One of the current legal scandals is that over "salt poisoning", the absurd idea that it could be possible to force feed a child a significant part of their body weight in salt thereby killing them. Not possible. Even if it were possible to force feed a child large amounts of raw salt, such amount would still not appear in the blood stream, according to the testimony of many experts in the field (but not, unfortunately, the one called to testify in court). I speak, of course, of Ian and Angela Gay, locked up for killing their adopted child by salt poisoning, a rather more likely explanation being salt diabetes. I believe they were eventually freed from the Court of Appeal but they shouldn't have been convicted in the first place.

WHAT HITLER GOT RIGHT

The Nazis were very much sentimental feminists, as E Belfort Bax would say. Goerring specifically said that civilisation was based on women. However, Hitler wasn't as mental as people like to make out.

Mein-Kampf Volume 1 Chapter 2:

In hardly any German city could the social question have been studied better than in Vienna. But make no mistake. This 'studying' cannot be done from lofty heights. No one who has not been seized in the jaws of this murderous viper can know its poison fangs. Otherwise nothing results but superficial chatter and false sentimentality. Both are harmful. The former because it can never penetrate to the core of the problem, the latter because it passes it by. I do not know which is more terrible: inattention to social misery such as we see every day among the majority of those who have been favored by fortune or who have risen by their own efforts, or else the snobbish, or at times tactless and obtrusive, condescension of certain women of fashion in skirts or in trousers, who ' feel for the people.' In any event, these gentry sin far more than their minds, devoid of all instinct, are capable of realizing. Consequently, and much to their own amazement, the result of their social 'efforts' is always nil, frequently, in fact, an indignant rebuff, though this, of course, is passed off as a proof of the people's ingratitude. It is these liberal attitudes, giving the poor crumbs from their own table that caused the working classes to found the Labour party in 1905 (formerly the Labour Representation Commitee).

FEMINISM WORLD DOMINATION

Don't be surprised by the micro-loans business and other feminist interventions in the third world. It is the business of the right wing to intervene where they have no right to be. Much as they have always liked trying to breed paranoia about the supposed world communist conspiracy it is they who have always been intervening in democratic developments of which they disapprove. See Jacobo Arbenz, Iran/Contra, Mossadegh, Russian Civil War (in which all of the major Western capitalist countries sent armies to help the whites), Spanish Civil War (in which the western powers refused to help the Republic, the Fascist powers armed the Fascists and the Americans supplied the fascists with oil).

Don't think the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (US) was a selfless act, either. It was a move to destroy Marxism and other genuinely threatening movements, to destroy the black groups, and the parachute the feminists into power on the backs of the blacks.

The Bible is quite clear that women must be in subjection to their husbands.

NAZI WITCHES: EQUAL RITES

Another link between the feminists and the SS is the common view they hold of the so-called prehistoric venus figurines, which were held by the feminists to be evidence of a pre-historic matriarchal and/or goddess worshipping civilisation which was displaced by invading patriarchal "Kurgans" (feminists also claim to have found Kurgan graves with armed women, making them the feminists pre-historic idyll, but consistency has never been a stron suit of feminists), as the Reichsfuhrer SS Heinrich Himmler held that the Aryans had conquered Europe from a race of big-bottomed Jew/Hottentots (fat is a feminist issue, you know), and idea he based on the so-called Venus figurines. The Women's Studies groups therefore take the role of the SS, especially of the Ahnenerbe, manufacturing evidence for female Baltic societies as the Ahnenerbe manuctured evidence for Hans Horbiger's deluded World Ice Theory and the ancient origins of the Master Race in Tibet.

Planned Parenthood, the continuation of the old Eugenics societies, is another like to the Nazis and to the modern world elite and their obsession with population control.

The idea behind Nazi eugenics, as with feminist eugenics (the abortionists target blacks, the poor and other unfit members of society) was to take us, the Master Race, back to a previous time, before we had been seduced into interbreeding with our inferiors, when we had weird magic powers, for the Master race had descended from heaven. So agree the feminists, that women had weird magical powers before the Kurgans came along.

Aryan giants with psychic powers being dragged down by Jewish interbreeding or goddess-worshipping matriarch dragged down by Kurgan conquest and the ensuing patriarchy, it's very much the same thing. Not surprising given the links between Nazism and the feminist movement, through Gimbutas and the CIA.

And, as the Ashtar and company contacted the Nazis through the Vril society and the mediums it employed so the feminists practice Baal-worship by burning the unborn on their unclean altars.

And what profession is, more than any other, more even than the media, infiltrated by feminism? Social work! The Nazis were paedophile and child- murderers, so it must be hilarious to them to see people being falsely accused and families being destroy by teachers and social workers EVEN AS their own successors in the CIA and Military Intelligence PsyOps, along with senior politicians and members of the Country and Western Establishment get away with it, scot-free. The false accusations also serve the purpose of making people doubtful of the truthful accusations, such as those against Michael Aquino.

It doesn't help that feminist groups make most of these false accusations, no doubt at the behest of their paymasters. Their's also lots of money to be made from lawsuits and the government compensation which pays women to make accusations of rape with no regard to their veracity. Not only are aborted foetuses being used as a source of stem cells for beauty treatments but LIVE HUMAN CHILDREN are being kidnapped by doctors in the Ukraine and harvested for their brain and organ tissue to be liquidised and injected into the face of wrinkly Western women, according to the BBC (Radio 4's "Stem Cell Swindle II").

A single human foetus can sell for as much a £17,000 if it's determined to be a good source of stem cells. Expensive but medically dubious procedures are carried out with liquidised infant organs and foetuses.

Live, post-birth, children are being taking from women and hacked up to get at their juicy, stem-cell rich, bone marrow, their brains are being sucks out and their mangled corpses disposed of in mass graves.

As if it wasn't sick enough to put the foreskins of mutilated young boys into face cream, now whole children and entire embryos are being used in the same way, to facilitate the profiteering of a small group of Mengele-like fraudsters and to save the rich white woman from sagging jowls and unyouthful looking skin!

As the BBC says:

Healthy new-born babies may have been killed in Ukraine to feed a flourishing international trade in stem cells, evidence obtained by the BBC suggests. The human rights group the Council for Europe agrees. But nothing is done! The BBC has spoken to mothers from the city of Kharkiv who say they gave birth to healthy babies, only to have them taken by maternity staff.

In 2003 the authorities agreed to exhume around 30 bodies of foetuses and full-term babies from a cemetery used by maternity hospital number six.

One campaigner was allowed into the autopsy to gather video evidence. She has given that footage to the BBC and Council of Europe.

In its report, the Council describes a general culture of trafficking of children snatched at birth, and a wall of silence from hospital staff upwards over their fate. For those who don't trust the BBC the Daily Mail agrees, as does this.

It's Molech all over again. It's the human sacrifices of Carthage. It's the giant stone (apparently it's actually made of plastic) owl George Bush worships at Bohemian Grove.

Only witches would voluntarily rub baby flesh on themselves, and indeed medieval witches made candles from the soft and tender flesh of infants, although the hand of glory had to be constructed from a criminal sentenced to death and executed (see the Ingoldby Legends, "The Hand of Glory"). It's no excuse, although it's true, that they're:

We are merely walking down the path that Mrs. Sanger carved for us. --DR. ALAN GUTTMACHER, PRESIDENT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD, 1962-74. DRIVEN TO MURDER

Here is the suicide note of Marc LePine, written before he went and killed 14 female engineering students (there were, of course, accusations that he had been put on prozac and become the victim of a mind control experiment, but he could have just reached the end of his tether):

Please note that if I am committing suicide today 89/12/06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons. For I have decided to send Ad Patres the feminists who have ruined my life. It has been seven years that life does not bring me any joy and being totally blase, I have decided to put an end to those viragos.

I had already tried as a youth to enlist in the [Armed] Forces as an officer cadet, which would have allowed me to enter the arsenal and precede Lortie in a rampage. They refused me because of asociality. So I waited until this day to carry out all my projects. In between, I continued my studies in a haphazard way for they never really interested me, knowing in advance my fate. Which did not prevent me from obtaining very good marks despite not handing in my theory assignments and studying little before exams.

Even though the Mad Killer epithet will be attributed to me by the media, I consider myself a rational and erudite person that only the arrival of the Grim Reaper has forced to undertake extreme acts. For why persevere in existing if it is only to please the government? Being rather retrograde by nature (except for science), the feminists always have a talent for enraging me. They want to retain the advantages of being women (e.g. cheaper insurance, extended maternity leave preceded by a preventive leave) while trying to grab those of the men.

Thus, it is self-evident that if the Olympic Games removed the Men/Women distinction, there would be only be women in the graceful events. So the feminists are not fighting to remove that barrier. They are so opportunistic that they neglect to profit from the knowledge accumulated by men throughout the ages. They always try to misrepresent them every time they can. Thus, the other day, people were honoring the Canadian men and women who fought at the frontlines during the world wars. How does this sit with the fact that women were not authorized to go to the frontline at the time??? Will we hear of Caesar's female legions and female galley slaves who of course took up 50 per cent of history's ranks, although they never existed? A real Casus Belli. Sorry for this too brief letter.

OUR ONLY FREEDOM: FREEDOM TO KILL

As Henry Makow says:

A smoking gun! The elite doesn't want us to reproduce.

In 1970, Frederick Jaffe, the VP of Rockefeller-sponsored "Planned Parenthood" organization outlined how "social constraints" should be used to achieve "fertility control." ("Family Planning Perspectives" Oct.1970.)

These "constraints" included encouraging "increased homosexuality," altering "the image of the ideal family," and encouraging women to work outside the home.

If this failed, the agency recommended the placement of "fertility control agents in the water supply." We're not talking about unwanted pregnancies here.

We certainly aren't! Betty Frieden, the "moderate" feminist founder, who hid the fact that she was a Communist activist, compared homemakers to concentration camp victims. Simone de Beauvoir, another Communist founder, said women must not be given a choice to be mothers and homemakers because they'll choose that option. According to feminist Ellen Willis, feminism "is the cutting edge of a revolution in cultural and moral values...The objective of every feminist reform, from legal abortion...to child-care programs, is to undermine traditional family values." (The Nation, Nov. 14, 1981) What part of traditional family values do feminists object to? Love? Sacrifice? Devotion? Loyalty? Security? The preparation of a new generation for life?

THEY'RE NOT CALLED FEMINAZIS FOR NOTHING Rockefeller financed the Nazis through I.G. Farben. He sponsored the American Eugenics Society that had close links to its Nazi counterpart.

Rockefeller financed Alfred Kinsey, the homosexual pederast whose "Kinsey Report" replaced married love with casual sex.

Rockefeller continues to finance "Women's Studies" which is a training ground for fascist zealots who spread their poison in society as "change agents." (See Daphne Patai, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.)

The elite is promoting homosexuality to bring about a fascist New World Order. Homosexuality is a developmental disorder characterized by a failure to bond with a member of the opposite sex. Lesbianism (feminism) which coerces women to be like men (and vice-versa) makes it difficult to achieve such a bond. As a result, millions of men and women have been defrauded of happiness and suffer the same symptoms as homosexuals, i.e. arrested development, and obsession with sex. LITTLE VENUS

I read a book called Martian Genesis once. It said humanity on earth was started by giant matriarchal martians. Chapter Nine is called "Worshipping the Goddess".

Since the discovery of the 'Venus of Willendorf', as this little artwork came to be called, scores more goddess figurines have come to light. The wide geographical scope is one indication of the goddess religion. One goddess figurine, discovered before the Willendorf Venus, is seldom mentioned in the standard texts of archaeology. It came from a well boring at Nampa, Idaho, in 1889. It was no more than an inch and a half long, a female figure that '...would do credit to the classical centres of art' according to G.F. Wright. This figurine has been dated to the Plio-Pleistocene era, which makes it about 2 millions years old. Not even the Ancient Egyptians believed their civilisation reached back to that time. But it acccords quite neatly with the idea that the earliest of our civilisationswas a transplant from the planet mars and raises a fascinating field of speculations.

To date, many of those tempted to discuss the sex of the face on Mars, have concluded it is male. The 'platform' surrounding the face itself is often taken as a headdress, of even military helmet. The 'diadem' which emerges on computer enhancement is seen as an indication that this is the face of a king.

Yet such conclusions may be no more than the projection of a male-oriented culture. If the face is in fact female - and the 'helmet' actually a styling of hair - then it becomes possible that Earth's ancient goddess religionliterally came down from the heavens.

-- Martian Genesis, Chapter Nine, Section Three

Madness. Nazi madness.

Here's a good debunkation of some of the feminist mythology.

Perhaps most seductively of all, the Goddess misrepresents her own history, claiming to be the heir of an unbroken line of covert pagans and druids who secretly preserved the Goddess' occult healing ways since remote antiquity despite Christian persecution. Davis convincingly traces the origin of the contemporary Goddess movement not to classical antiquity but to 19th- century French and German Romanticism. "Nothing about the Goddess myth correlates with what we know of the ancient civilizations which her devotees claim as their foremothers; everything, however, has clearly identifiable roots in the modern subcultures which began with Romanticism and the nineteenth-century occult revival." In Romanticism, "the supreme importance of feelings, and the purity of the primitive," were emphasized.

[Just like Nazism! - SM] "The prized Romantic values of emotion, intuition, affinity with nature, and boundless love coincided with the qualities which traditional stereotypes had already assigned to women."

In his version of Faust, Goethe wrote of mysterious, otherwise-unknown beings called "The Mothers,"

[The Unknown Hitler by Wulf Schwartzwaller: "ancient, highly intelligent beings (similar to the 'Masters' of Theosophy or the White Brotherhood)" - SM] whose power Mephistopheles acknowledged to be far greater than his own. Goethe concluded that work with his enigmatic and famous line, "The Eternal Feminine draws us on high." Works by utopian social reformers like the Count of Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, Auguste Comte, Jules Michelet, Alphonse Constant, and others, enormously influential in their day, promoted a viewpoint Davis describes as "the Romantic idealization of women as spiritually pure channels of love, intuitively connected to nature." These utopians, who sought not merely to improve society but to create a literal paradise on earth, suggested that the key to re-establishing Eden lay in the redemptive powers of woman as messiah. Indeed, one French Saint-Simonist group proclaimed in 1832 the immanent appearance of a female messiah, and symbolically kept an empty chair for her to preside over their meetings . When she failed to appear in France, a vision showed her appearing in Constantinople in 1833, resulting in an expedition to search for her there; she was never found.

After the utopians' hopes for an earthly paradise were dashed by the failure of Europe's revolutions of 1848, Alphonse Constant took to dabbling in the Kabbalah, and began calling himself "Eliphas Lévi." He played a major role in the 19^th-century occult revival, while still promoting ideas of earthly salvation through the feminine. Direct lines from his writings and from his disciples can be drawn to subsequent Rosicrucianism,

[Rosicrucianism - Bulward Lytton - Karl Haushofer - Vrilism (the Luminous Lodge, later the Nazi Occult Bureau) - Nazism. - SM]

Theosophy, and most significantly the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which gave us Aleister Crowley, from whom it is only a short step (via Gerald B. Gardner) to the contemporary feminist neopagan practices of Miriam "Starhawk" Simos, Zsuzsanna Budapest, and Margot Adler.

GLORIA STEINEM: SYNARCHIST

See how the CIA have used feminism.

"I was never asked to report on other Americans or assess foreign nationals I had met." -- Gloria Steinem

The Red Stockings charge that this statement is an alarming lie. In a "Report on the Vienna Youth Festival" printed with Steinem's name on it as director of the Independent Research Service, there are 13 pages devoted exclusively to biographies, political affiliations, and even some superficial analyses of persons from all countries participating in the festival. Youths were monitored in much the same way at the 1962 World Youth Festival in Helsinki. In addition to the news and cultural events put on by the Independent Research Service, the Helsinki festival was marked by four nights of "spontaneous" rioting against the festival during which 40 people were arrested. It was reported by Newsweek in August 1962 that "Pravda, of course, blamed the disturbances on well-financed CIA and FBI agents."

(Interrupting briefly. Of course remember that Newsweek is published by Katherine Graham. We're going to be coming to her role in setting up Ms. [magazine] in just a minute.)

This is Gloria Steinem's background from the late 1950s and early 1960s. She functioned as a secret representative of the American government abroad. At least, she was representing certain American interests, and her activities in the Independent Research Service involved her inextricably with the U.S. domestic political intelligence network.

Another fact exhumed by the Red Stockings is the group's [Independent Research Service's] publication of a pamphlet in 1959 called, "A Review of Negro Segregation in the United States." Steinem's name is listed on the inside cover, this time as co-director of the Independent Research Service. The pamphlet focusses on the supposed advances made by black people in the U.S. For example: "Beyond the noisy clamor of those who would obstruct justice and fair play, no alert observer can be unaware of the concerted effort to rule out segregation from every aspect of American life." The reason some discrimination does still occur, according to the research group, is because "it is also self-perpetuating, in that the rejected group, through continued deprivation, is hardened in the very shortcomings, real or imaginary, that are given as the reasons for the discrimination in the first place."

In other words, the oppression of blacks continues not because of white, ruling-class interests, but because black people actually have become inferior.

[...]

By 1967, the Independent Research Service was declared "largely inactive" by the New York Times. Steinem, however, was still a director in 1968 when Ramparts [magazine] broke another story. This time they disclosed that the CIA had plans of their own for another World Youth Festival to be held in Sofia, Bulgaria. A scandal involving some confidential letters implicating the CIA, which found their way into print before the festival, had the effect of curtailing the CIA's plans for youths in Sofia.

It was during the following year, 1969-70, that Gloria Steinem first began publicly identifying herself with the Women's Movement. Around this same time, Red Stocking researchers noted there was a change in the biographical information listed about Steinem in *Who's Who*. Reportedly, *Who's Who* sends data sheets to their subjects requesting them to furnish the details. The 1968 and '69 edition was the first issue ever mentioning Steinem, and at the time she was listed as "Director, educational foundation, Independent Research Service, Cambridge, Massachusetts/New York City, 1959-62. Now member Board of Directors, Washington." By the 1970 edition of *Who's Who*, this entry was shortened to "Director, educational foundation, 1959-60." No mention of her position in Washington on the Board of Directors appears, and she abbreviated her term of employment with the Independent Research Service to one year. The censored version appears in each successive edition of *Who's Who*.

There does seem to be an attempt on Steinem's part to mislead Ms. readers and conceal parts of her past. For instance, her bio-blurb in June 1973 Ms. is even vaguer: "Gloria Steinem has been a free-lance writer all her professional life. Ms. magazine is her first full-time, salaried job." Her romantic history is also interesting: Do not forget that Gloria Steinem dated Henry Kissinger at one time. Kissinger is a big name in the Monarch mind control community. Perhaps that's how he got Steinem on side. I hear she was a looker in her younger days. Induce some easily controlled alters. Normal way of setting up spies. Perhaps she's just a victim in all this, albeit an evil one. An interesting bit of information here concerning Gloria Steinem. And again: this on the occasion of her 50th birthday. This is from Newsweek, the issue of June 4th, 1984. There's an article on Gloria Steinem's 50th birthday. It's very short. It's entitled, "Steinem at 50: Gloria in Excelsis." (And I'm only going to read you one sentence of this article.)

"In previous incarnations, Steinem dated Mike Nichols, Rafer Johnson, and other notables. For the past nine years she has been romantically involved with Washington attorney Stanley Pottinger, a Republican and former Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights."

But he was Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights under the Nixon/Ford administration, from 1973 until 1977. You'll all recall what Nixon's Justice Department was like: both Mr. Kleindeist and John Mitchell were indicted -- Mitchell convicted and Kleindeist eventually... I don't know whether he was convicted and received a suspended sentence, or whether he eventually was acquitted. But half the Nixon Justice Department wound up being indicted on one charge or another, many of them acquitted, most in connection with the Watergate affair. They also presided over COINTELPRO and a number of other interesting things. Surely the Nixon administration has never been regarded as a great champion of civil rights. And a woman like Gloria Steinem, who is at least nominally aligned with a civil rights movement, the feminist movement... Well, her association, her 9-year romantic involvement with Mr. Pottinger, is really intriguing.

Now those of you who listen to Mae Brussell's "World Watcher" series will recall Mae referring very briefly to Mr. Pottinger's [alleged] involvement in an arms smuggling scam. (Research credit for the following article, again, goes to Mr. Ted Rubenstein.)

So much for the freedom loving feminist movement. As its opponents have long known ity is vitriolic in its opposition to freedom, so it's hardly surprising that it was set up by the people behind Pinochet have women raped with dogs in Chile, and Pottinger who covered up assassinations of Chilean dissidents on American soil.

Given that women have got where they are, in terms of the power of the feminist movement, by riding the blacks, it's hardly surprising Steinem was associated with Pottinger, who was part of the Martin Luther King assassination.

Feminism was originally created, in part, to advocate for prohibition, part of the long-term government/ruling-class conspiracy to use organised crime for covert ops.

SIMMEL AND GIMBUTAS: NAZI OCCULTISM LIVES ON THROUGH THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT Simmel was a Nazi philosopher of sorts who believed in the feminine nature of man being a desirable state, rather than the "iron cage" of rationality". Gimbutas was educated by a Nazi ehtnologist, before transforming the ariosophical doctrine into the feminist doctrine with which her name in associated, as noted elsewhere in these Files.

See the Theozoological cosmogeny of tLanz von Liebenfels:

In 1904, he published his book "Theozoologie" ("theozoology") in which he advocated sterilization of the sick and the "lower races" as well as forced labour for "castrated chandals", and glorified the "aryan race" as "Gottmenschen" ("god men"). Lanz justified his neognostic racial ideology by attempting to give it a biblical foundation; according to him, Eve, which he described as initially being divine, involved herself with a demon and gave birth to the "lower races" in the process. Furthermore, he claimed that this led to blonde women being attracted primarily to "dark men", something that only could be stopped by "racial demixing" so that the "aryan-christian master humans" could "once again rule the dark-skinned beastmen" and ultimately achieve "divinity". A copy of this book was sent to Swedish poet August Strindberg, from who Lanz received an enthusiastic reply in which he was described as a "prophetic voice". CONCLUSION

I will conclude with the opening words of the Fraud of Feminism by E Belfort Bax:

THE following essay was published at the end of 1913 and is now reissued as originally written. Since the year before the World War the situation of woman has, of course, changed. Feminism in this and in some other countries has won well-nigh all its formal demands. Mr Asquith, who before the war declared he would have nothing to do with a House of Commons elected by a female vote, during the war, for no assignable reason, suddenly made a volte-face [about-face] and became a strong advocate of female franchise. The acquisition of the suffrage has as its result carried with it the right to all occupations and offices, as decreed by the "Sex-Disability Repeal Act," and so the pitch-forking of women into administrative posts proceeds galore. But the main contentions of The Fraud of Feminism have not been affected by the change in question. Though women have been conceded all the rights of men, their privileges as females have remained untouched, while the sentimental "pull" they have over men, and the favouritism shown them in the courts, civil and criminal, often in flagrant violation of elementary justice, continues as before. The result of their position on juries, as evinced in certain trials, has rather confirmed the remarks made in Chapter II. anent hysteria than otherwise. The sex-bias of men in favour of women and the love of the advanced woman towards her sex-self show no sign of abatement. Proposals to the effect that in the event of infanticide by a mother the putative father should be placed in the dock merely because he is a man are received with applause. The other day, at a court held in a fashionable town of the south coast, on a prostitute being brought up charged with soliciting, a female "justice," recently appointed, declaimed against the wickedness of punishing prostitutes for soliciting while men were never brought up charged with the offence. (Needless to say, there was the usual male fool to be found in the body of the court, who shouted: "Hear ! Hear !") Now is it conceivable, I ask, that anybody can be so infatuated with Feminism as not to see that a prostitute who solicits nightly in the exercise of her trade-- i.e . for the purpose of money-making--is in a different position from a man who, once in a way, may, urged by natural passion, make advances to a woman? Such a person must be unable to see distinctions in anything, one would think. Besides, it is not true that men, if charged with the annoyance or molestation of women, cannot be, and have not been, prosecuted for the offence. The lady "justice" in question would probably like to see a man paired with a prostitute in the dock every time the latter gave occasion for police action. Such is the Feminist notion of justice. There are a vast number of men who cultivate the pretence of having a contempt for, or a prejudice against, their own sex. The idea seems to be to pander to the sex-vanity of the "New Woman." Every popular writer caters for this prejudice. No one can have failed to notice the persistent journalistic and literary "stunt" by which the man is portrayed in the light of a miserable and abject living creature as a foil to the "noble animal" woman. There is scarcely a play, short story or novel the plot of which in any way admits of it where this now stale device is not dragged in in some form or shape. Even Shaw, with all his somewhat ostentatious flouting of convention, cannot resist the temptation of yielding to it in one or two of his plays--e.g. Catherine the Great. This sort of thing is not without its influence on the course of justice, as the daily papers still continue to show us. Times have not changed in this respect. The war, which has altered the face of things otherwise and in the matter of the social and political aspect of sex- relations, has been the occasion of revolutionary transformation in the shape of political sex- equality, has left female privilege, civil and criminal, as it was in 1913. There is no indication that the general public has a dawning sense that, to adapt the common metaphor, "What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Everywhere we hear the same old bogus grievances of the female sex trotted out as crying for remedy, but never the injustice of a man being compelled, whatever his economic position, to keep his wife, while a woman is under no corresponding obligation to keep her husband. No urgency is suggested for removing the anomaly that a husband is amenable for his wife's libels and slanders; none that a boy of fourteen is punishable for a sexual offence to which he has been incited by a girl of sixteen, who gets off scot-free; none that the obligation of a husband, whose wife wishes to bring an action for divorce against him, to furnish her with the money to fight him, should be abolished. On the other hand, every law, every judicial decision, every case in the courts, civil and criminal, that on the most superficial view can be exploited by the conventional Feminist claptrap to prove the wickedness of "man- made law" to woman, is gripped by the beak of the Feminist harpy to help build up her nest of lying sex-prejudice, whence she and her confraternity may sally forth and by their raids on male sentiment not merely help to buttress up existing female privilege, but wherever possible to increase the already one-sided injustice of the law and its administration towards men in the interest of the other sex. Women Don’t Need Men!

Feminism has been convincing women they “don’t need men” since the 1960’s. Now women have one problem. They can’t find husbands. Successful women often make men feel demoralized and inadequate. According to a recent article by Margaret Wente, What if Women Don’t Need Guys Any More: “Magdalena Hinojosa, (above) a striking-looking single woman, is a senior associate vice-president at the University of Texas. She’s learned that her job makes men uneasy. So when they ask her what she does, she simply tells them she works … in the admissions office. “You have to hide who you are, at the beginning, until that person is comfortable with you,” she says. In the past fifty years, feminism has swept through society like an Oklahoma tornado leaving a trail of wreckage: 1. “Women in America now earn almost half the family income, and more than half in lower-income families. Forty per cent of wives now out earn their husbands. And the gender gap is closing fast. The median income of young, unmarried urban women in their 20s is now higher than the men’s.” 2. “More than half of births to American women under 30 now occur outside marriage. One mother, Amber Strader, 27, said she was in an on-and-off relationship when she got pregnant. Marrying her boyfriend, a clerk at Sears, never entered her mind. “It was like living with another kid.” 3. Men have been deprived of their identity. “What happens when they aren’t needed as providers any more? What happens when their sense of purpose is lost? The answer is, they become unmoored.” 4. The US birthrate is down from 23 births per 1000 in 1960 to 13.8 in 2011, the lowest point in history! In 1960, 72% of all American adults were married; in 2010 just 51% were. The number dropped sharply by 5% in the most recent year, 2009-10. We don’t need to debate that a stable loving marriage between a man and a woman is the best foundation for raising children, and for giving people identity, purpose and love. With statistics like those cited above, you’d think the government and media would be sounding the alarm. What do we hear instead? The news is full of homosexual marriage. Gays don’t have children. Those who want to marry represent roughly one person in every thousand. Schools and media actively promote homosexuality which is a debilitating developmental disorder. “Gay Rights”is a mask for a vile attack on heterosexuals. Obviously something is fundamentally wrong. Our society has been subverted by a satanic cult, the Illuminati ( i.e. Freemasonry.) Our government, corporations and media are owned or controlled by the Illuminati central banking cartel. Everybody who achieves public success — educators, politicians, journalists, feminists in general — is either a dupe or a traitor. They have sold their soul to this devil-worshiping cult unwittingly or not. The “empowerment” of women was social engineering not social change. It was designed to make them seek career instead of family. They were told they could “have it all” but for most, that was a lie. Anyone can do a job. Only a woman can be a mother. Naturally she needs her husband’s support.Feminism has deprived millions of women of a socially honored lifetime role. The institutions of marriage and family are being undermined in order to destabilize society, making it vulnerable to the Illuminati Communist NWO. The destruction of marriage and family has been a plank in the Communist Manifesto since 1848. Luckily, men aren’t buying the nonsense in articles like “What if Women Don’t Need Guys Any More.” Here is a sample from the 665 comments it drew: How come with this take on the situation, that according to Statistics Canada, 96 % of ex spousal support is paid by men? If there was justice shouldn’t this situation be corrected? What nobody needs is you Margaret. This piece already ran in the Atlantic a few months back. Pretty much all of the education system is now geared to the female mind and personality. The result, predictably, is that boys are dropping out of school at alarming rates and graduating less. I still remember the day my son (then in grade 3) was sent home with a “yellow card” because he jostled with a friend in line. It never occurred to the teacher that jostling is what boys do. It’s how they express friendship. When he “graduated” from grade 8, all but two of the 20 or so awards went to girls. Can you imagine the outrage if the ratio had been reversed? Maybe its time we start giving men preferential treatment in jobs? I have a bit more education than my wife, but she makes a bit more money. She has a politically correct government job that wouldn’t be given to a white male, while I have my own business and create work for other people. Go figure. Many of the ideals of feminism come from lesbian based thinking. It is very real that lesbians within the feminist movement has steered many women, unbeknownst to themselves, to forgo and disdain the lives of their mothers. … It’s the gay feminist secrecy that I find galling. I thought we were supposed to have come out of the closet by now. Or are they afraid that such knowledge would undermine their credibly. BTW, I am gay too so don’t call me “phobic”. Margaret Wente has misinterpreted social trends. Men don’t need wives any-more. There was a time when men were expected to marry and provide for the family. This was always a large burden carried on the backs of men. Women’s success in the workforce has freed men. Since providing for the children is no longer a man’s job, men can now dedicate more time to leisure and are not slaves to jobs or careers. As an architect I can say here – in anonymity – that most of the women architects I have worked with are indeed better at the talking and sitting part. They love to vocalize and pick colors and finishes, but the hard work of focusing for a long period to flesh something out and design it in detail is not their forte. They get down right antsy when they have to do any of the detailed work, they call in sick and act out in a passive aggressive way. And the female engineers are the same. They love to talk and talk, but don’t ask them anything too specific – they will not have the answers. Women are best in roles where they can talk and talk and talk. Journalism (like Margaret, whose job is to talk about whatever pops into her head), government, sales, marketing, “personnel” (whatever that means). Although I have had the pleasure of working with a few very competent women, when it comes to solving problems and meeting deadlines, generally speaking, give me other men to work with – any day. Men have not ever needed women. They have always been independent. But do you ever hear them saying this? Of course not. Because they have the decency to subsume their personal interest in the aim of having a family. Feminists who want to stay alone can stay single. And good riddance. Women don’t need men, until it’s time to pay the bill. I like having a girl friend. Don’t ever want to live with a woman though. Most don’t know how to cook, keep a clean place, and manage finances, or they are just plain lazy. And, biggest point of all, what a drag it A would be getting sucked into continual contact with her family. A living nightmare as women have constant contact visiting with her relatives too much for me to be around it all the time. I am not interested in them, I just like having a girl friend, not the whole team. So, deal breakers: I don’t want to have to raise a woman, wait on her hand and foot, merge finances with a financial over spender, have kids in an overpopulated crazy world, too expensive to have kids world, and be absorbed by her family, losing my autonomy.

Two Eyes Wide

FEMINISM LESSON: This lesson is about the connection with one of the 13 bloodlines (Van Duyn) and the masonic creation of feminism. Feminism went around since the Civil War era and back. This was an agenda to create separation between a man and a woman. Others believe it's a pagan spirit that considers feminism the goal to bring down the corporate man. But the corporations fund the idea of feminism. How did feminism started? Well, let's jump aboard the time machine. In 40 years down, women started to lose touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray. Rockefeller’s role into this was that Nicholas Rockefeller told CFR recruit Aaron Russo that his family foundation created women’s liberation using mass media control as part as a long-term plan to enslave humanity. Their idea was to insert chips inside people. The burn your bra idea was an agenda to bring women from their male spouses and start a war against marriage and families. The hidden goal of feminist is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family. The idea to make the man lower is to cause divorces and even control on the young masses through the idea of keeping them from pro-creating and lowering the high standards of the family. Feminism has also become violent within places such as England where there are young girl gangs. In Russia there is a group of female musicians called “Pussy Riot” and their agenda is to push feminism to its highest in Russia. Another is that they have shown false signs of homosexuality born within them. There are several studies that the “butch” female claimed to be born as a guy originally, but that is all false as 10% of the man and woman population are claimed to be born gay. The 90% fit the feminist agenda which created the idea of gay and lesbianism. At the same time, however, feminism also held that masculinity was a problem. It was men, alone, who were held to be aggressive - crime was presented as intrinsically a male problem - as well as being emotionally illiterate and unfairly hogging the workplace, while women were chained to kitchen sink and family. (Phillip Jones 7/28/2009) Most feminist are wives of freemasons and were the wives would only want to be the freemason’s “brothers,” to put their masonic vows over the marriage vows. They were led to infidelity in order to compromise and blackmail them, who worship Lucifer, and who devote all their time and money to the lodge. Many feminine groups such as Spice Girls, Unite Women group, etc are a form or another of the feminist agenda separating or converting young girls into the lesbian lifestyle. This is programming at its worse to help not only the agenda to destroy the family, but also to push the idea of Van Duyn’s Planned Parenthood idea. Unitewomen is a controlled opposition group ran by feminist that specially funds Planned Parenthood and help control the population span by using Planned Parenthood as their sponsor. This has enraged many which men created their agenda groups to thwart Unite Women organization and expose Planned Parenthood. However, this failed as a case. The media eradicates love such as movies, television, magazines, music, commercials, and news. It’s used for social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. Feminism has control the idea of love using the idea of feminine sex slavery making the man a slave or S&M. Adultery has become stronger and stronger and has pushed through the media whereas now there are agenda style magazines such as Ladies Home Journal. Lifetime Television Network as made a hidden message where they stated, “Men can no longer be trusted.” The programming (MK Ultra) that Lifetime uses is that all men are 1) unfaithful rats, 2) abusive monsters, 3) dishonest scumbags, and 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand are usually ubervictims, flinty achievers who triumph despite the caveman who…want to keep them in their place. The television show called the View caters to feminism and their views. This is to program women in America to fight against the man and break away families. They attack the teenage men into becoming more feminize and break the traditions of the man gender. Divorce has become a problem as well. The average percentage of divorces has risen to 68% in both male and females (combining 35% on male divorces and 32% on female divorces) in the year 1980, but in 2013 reached the high of 86.6% due to the effects of feminism. This has become a problem in the household where the man wins custody over the earnings of his insurance and wealth. Putting men in situations of child support is also a feminist agenda where the man has to pay money to support the lady’s child she bears for him. The courts are funded to make the man the winner of the civil divorce case to push the agenda of feminism into divorced women. The government controlled opposition, Sandra Fluke is paid to push the idea of feminism which she got into an altercation with another controlled opposition Rush Limbaugh. This was their key goal to program divorce, racism, and depopulation within the family values of shortening poor Euro- Americans, poor African Americans, poor Mexican Americans, and poor Asian American families to eradicate the poor social class. Not only had feminism created gay and lesbianism through the masses, but has downgraded the male. The downfall of men went to total chaos as the values of men has changed. Throughout the media, men has been established in the wrong way as their ladies or wives on family shows now a days are established in negative ways. Feminism unravels heterosexuality by blurring the inherent sexual differences. As a result, many men are turning off to American women, marriage and children. Hippies inherit the feminism charms as they push the route of feminism using such brute and masculine attitudes to force men into becoming feminine and losing the value of love. This has become current during festivals such as Eeoyre’s Birthday.

Personal

If you still want to be a feminist fine.But stop trying to change society.Keep it on tumblr