Journal xyz 2017; 1 (2): 122–135 Article • DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2019-0011 NJMR • 9(3) • 2019 • 363-381 The First Decade (1964-1972) Research Article Max Musterman, Paul Placeholder NEGOTIATING FEMALE GENITAL CUTTING AS What Is So Different About A DIFFICULT CHARACTERISTIC IN KURDISH Neuroenhancement? NATIONAL IDENTITY Was ist so anders am Neuroenhancement? Pharmacological and Mental Self-transformation in Ethic IngvildComparison Bergom Lunde1,2*, Mette Sagbakken3, R. Elise B. Johansen2 1 UniversityPharmakologische of Oslo, Oslo, Norway und mentale Selbstveränderung im 2 Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway 3 Osloethischen Metropolitan University, Vergleich Oslo, Norway * E-mail:
[email protected] https://doi.org/10.1515/xyz-2017-0010 Receivedreceived 31 May February 2018; Accepted 9, 2013; 27accepted January March 2019 25, 2013; published online July 12, 2014 AbstractAbstract: In the concept of the aesthetic formation of knowledge and its as soon Basedas on possiblefieldwork andamong success-oriented Kurds in Norway, this application, article explores insights how participants and profits described without the presence the of femalereference genital tocutting the arguments(FGC) in Kurdistan developed as a difficult around topic 1900. to addressThe main in public. investigation Perceptions also of how FGC shouldincludes be addressed the period ranged between from acknowledging the entry into and force directly and confronting the presentation it to silencing in its and current rejecting it as a Kurdish practice. The participants associated FGC with a “traditional mindset” and perceptions of version. Their function as part of the literary portrayal and narrative technique. female sexuality that did not readily fit into new ideologies of women’s liberation.