DOCSLIB.ORG

Career News - May 10, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Career News - May 10, 2016 Career News - May 10, 2016 May 10, 2016 Fall OCI for Class of 2018 Below is a calendar with several of the upcoming important dates -- -please mark your calendars accordingly. The OCI and Resume Collection sessions are as follows: OCI Sessions: August 1-5 & 8-9** Interview Location: UC Davis Hyatt Place Hotel (Aug 1-5) Interview Location: King Hall (Aug 8-9) Alumni Directory August 15 Interview Location: King Hall Job Search Resources August 29 - September 2 Symplicity Interview Location: King Hall Career News Archives September 6-9 Interview Location: King Hall Archive of Recorded Off-Campus Session: CSO Presentations August 4** Interview Location: Sofitel Hotel in Redwood City Walk-In Hours: Resume Collection Sessions: 11 AM - Noon & 4 - 5 PM, July Resume Collection Monday - Thursday; August Resume Collection 11 AM - 1 PM, Friday BIDDING opens (all sessions) - JUNE 10 3Ls: 12 PM - 1 PM, Tuesday - Thursday (with Lisa Carlock); Beginning June 10 at 12:01am you will be able to view the initial list 12 PM - 1 PM, Monday and of employers (for all sessions). Friday (with Shannon Kahn). You may also start bidding (applying) for employers (for all 3Ls may also access general sessions). walk-ins. All bidding goes through Symplicity. Need more than a few Bidding deadlines vary by session. Each session has its own minutes? deadline. Call 530.752.6574 to schedule an appointment. The first bidding deadline is July 14 at 11:00pm. You are only able to view employers who are recruiting for your class year. OCI Questions: Please contact Kim Thomas at 530.754.5719 or [email protected] with questions pertaining to Symplicity, OCI, Off-Campus or Resume Collections. 1Ls and 2Ls - Information on How to Have a Successful Summer If you missed this program put on by Career Services on April 19, 2016, we strongly recommend that you take the time to watch the recorded video in the Mediasite section of the Intranet before your summer position begins. The program discusses how to make the most of your summer position as well http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1111433437798&ca=0988eeae-f6e0-4863-b72e-887c5413aa1c[5/10/2016 11:25:52 AM] Career News - May 10, 2016 as how to get the offer from your firm or government employer or sponsorship from your public interest organization at the end of the summer. Sacramento County Bar Association Solo/Small Practice Division -- Spring Meet & Greet On May 17, 2016 from 5:30 to 7:30 PM, the Sacramento County Bar Association (SCBA) Solo/Small Practice Division will host its annual Spring Meet & Greet at the University of Beer in Mid-Town Sacramento. A relaxed, free event with food & drinks where you can meet the SSPD Board and other members to network, get involved, and let the Board know how the SSPD can best help you and other small firms. Admission is free, but please register online at www.sacbar.org-Event Calendar. Registration for the 12th Annual Bay Area Diversity Career Fair Saturday, July 23, 2016 Hilton San Francisco Financial District 750 Kearny Street San Francisco, CA (map) The Bay Area Diversity Career Fair attracts hiring representatives from the most prominent law firms, government legal departments, and nonprofit organizations. Only law students who have completed their first year of law school by the time of the interviews are eligible to participate. Openings are for 2017 2L summer associate positions. Note: UC Davis law students have received offers from employers through this fair in the past! Registration begins on: Monday, May 16 The registration site can be found here. Registration and bidding deadline: Sunday, June 12 11:59 p.m. PST A welcome reception for registered students and employers will be held on: Friday, July 22 at 6:00 p.m. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (map) For questions, please contact: Erica Bailey | Simah Bargzie | Michelle Lockhart Bay Area Diversity Career Fair Project Managers [email protected] Goodwin Procter Cocktail Receptions (for Class of 2018) Hello from Goodwin Procter! We are hosting receptions this summer for Rising 2Ls (the Class of 2018) at schools where we interview on-campus or through job fairs - this is a great way for you to get to know us (and vice versa) before the busy recruiting season. The receptions will take place in various locales in June, so if you are going to be in one of the cities listed below, we hope you will join us. Los Angeles: June 9, 6:00 pm-8:00 pm Goodwin Procter, 601 S. Figueroa St, 41st FL Northern California: June 7, 6:00 pm-8:00 pm Sens Restaurant, 4 Embarcadero Ctr, San Francisco http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1111433437798&ca=0988eeae-f6e0-4863-b72e-887c5413aa1c[5/10/2016 11:25:52 AM] Career News - May 10, 2016 To RSVP please email [email protected] with the city event you plan to attend. Note that space may be limited. There are also receptions in the following cities: New York, Boston and Washington DC. Please see the flyer in your Symplicity Resources/Document Library under Networking & Receptions in the Type drop-down list for RSVP information for the other reception locations. Note from Career Services: Goodwin Procter is registered for the UC Davis School of Law's Fall On- Campus Interview (OCI) program in August. Attending one of these receptions is a great opportunity to meet their attorneys before Fall OCI! Morgan Lewis Summer in the City Receptions (for Class of 2018) Meet our lawyers. Hear about our cutting-edge work. Get a feel for what it's like to work at Morgan Lewis. WHEN Monday, June 13, 2016 5:00-7:00 pm RSVP by June 8 to the Morgan Lewis office where you would like to attend. Los Angeles 355 South Grand Ave. RSVP to: Laura Lau at [email protected] San Francisco One Market, Spear Street Tower RSVP to: Heli Moberg at [email protected] There are also receptions in the following cities: New York, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Washington DC and Philadelphia. Please see the flyer in your Symplicity Resources/Document Library under Networking & Receptions in the Type drop-down list for RSVP information for the other reception locations. Note from Career Services: Morgan Lewis is registered for the UC Davis School of Law's Fall On- Campus Interview (OCI) program in August. Attending one of these receptions is a great opportunity to meet their attorneys before Fall OCI! 1Ls and 2Ls: Still Looking for a Summer Position? Cuneo, Black, Ward & Missler (Sacramento, CA): Deadline May 31, 2016, Symplicity ID # 351010 (for Class of 2017) Dowling Aaron Incorporated (Fresno, CA): Deadline June 15, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350989 (for Class of 2017) City of San Jose, Office of the City Attorney (San Jose, CA): Deadline May 21, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350928 (for Class of 2017) Yang & Associates, LLP (Cupertino, CA): Deadline ASAP, May 27, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350984 (for Class of 2018 and 2017) UC Davis School of Law, Summer Programs, International Law Programs (Davis, CA): Deadline May 20, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350917 (for Class of 2018 and 2017) Bankston Immigration Law Office (Berkeley, CA): Deadline May 22, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350881 (for Class of 2018) Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians (Valley Center, CA): Deadline May 16, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350893 (for Class of 2018 and 2017) Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP (San Diego, Los Angeles, CA): Deadline May 27, 2016, Symplicity http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1111433437798&ca=0988eeae-f6e0-4863-b72e-887c5413aa1c[5/10/2016 11:25:52 AM] Career News - May 10, 2016 ID # 350896 (for Class of 2017) Nevada County Public Defender's Office (Nevada City, CA): Deadline May 13, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350872 (for Class of 2018 and 2017) Law Offices of Tony J. Tanke (Davis, CA): Deadline June 17, 2016, Symplicity ID # 346834 (for Class of 2017 and 2016) Funding Circle (San Francisco, CA): Deadline May 31, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350449 (for Class of 2018 and 2017) Office of Administrative Hearings (Oakland, CA): Deadline May 30, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350448 (for Class of 2017) Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara (San Jose, CA): Deadline May 13, 2016, Symplicity ID # 350394 (for Class of 2018 and 2017) ABA Section of Litigation FREE Law Student Membership The ABA Section of Litigation's is providing FREE law student membership. With membership, law students will receive: Access to the Business Development webpage featuring videos and articles to help law students network, build a resume, and get a job; Subscriptions to the award-winning Litigation Journal and Monthly Litigation News electronically; Opportunities to network and learn more about practice areas you are interested in through over 35 committees; Discounts on 1-day Regional Meeting Workshops where law students can learn and network locally. Law students can join today by completing this form. National Association of Women Lawyers -- Free Law Student Membership The National Association of Women Lawyers offers free NAWL Memberships to law students for the duration of their time in law school and would love for more students to take advantage of this opportunity to become more involved in NAWL. In addition, NAWL will be partnering with Prudential Financial, Inc. to provide a summer internship opportunity for a first-year law student. Please see the website for more information. U.S. Department of Justice Volunteer Program Every year over 1,800 volunteer legal interns serve in DOJ components and U.S. Attorneys' Offices throughout the country. If you are interested in a DOJ volunteer internship, please review the many opportunities featured at www.justice.gov/careers/legal/volunteer-intern.html.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • District Clerk
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,.p.l I r r " 28 2 5 1.0 :: 11111 . _ 11111 . 3 2 I IIIII~~ n~M1. 11111 - . 3 6 Ik\ 11111 . BOO 4 0 Ii'-2. 001,I~. • 0 I• I :ij'",li IIIII~~ 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 150mm ->-----~-..... 6" UNI,TED STATES COURT. DIRECTORY Sf March 1, 1986 U.S. DepFrtment of Justice Natlonallnstitute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originallng it. Points of view or opinions staled in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ~l:lted material has been granted by • • Publlc DOmaln Lnllted States Court Directory to the National Criminal JUstice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ " ) sion of the epp.y.ri:ght owner. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 I 053 03 • UNITED STATES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division Office of the Chief (633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (763-1865) • • The information in this Directory is current as of March I, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court ...................................................................................................................... • United
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. 09-2473 in the United States Court of Appeals
    Case: 09-2473 Document: 00116058015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2010 Entry ID: 5443428 CASE NO. 09-2473 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HANOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. Defendants-Appellees, On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (District Court #1:07-cv-356) APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF MICHAEL NEWDOW ROSANNA FOX Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for Plaintiffs PO BOX 233345 12 ELDORADO CIRCLE SACRAMENTO, CA 95823 NASHUA, NH 03062 (916) 424-2356 (603) 318-8479 [email protected] [email protected] Case: 09-2473 Document: 00116058015 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2010 Entry ID: 5443428 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 ARGUMENT.......................................................................................................3 I. “God” means “God” ...........................................................................4 II. The “Power, Prestige and Financial Support of Government” Has Real Consequences............................................14 III. The Organizations Which Have Involved Themselves in this Case Demonstrate that the Case is About (Christian) Monotheism........................................................................................15 IV. Congress’ 2002 Reaffirmation of the Pledge was a Sham
    [Show full text]
  • Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 63 | Issue 3 Article 3 3-2012 Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L. Wasby Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen L. Wasby, Why Sit En Banc?, 63 Hastings L.J. 747 (2012). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol63/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. Wasby_63-HLJ-747 (Do Not Delete) 3/26/2012 5:28 PM Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L. Wasby* U.S. courts of appeals seldom provide reasons for granting or denying rehearing en banc. The most likely reason for rehearing en banc is that other judges believe the three-judge panel deciding the case had erred, although rehearing is not sought each time judges disagree with a panel. The formal bases for rehearing a case en banc include the three desiderata of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35—conflict with circuit precedent (intracircuit conflict), conflict with Supreme Court rulings, and presence of an issue of “exceptional importance”—and courts’ rules and general orders. Judges introduce other considerations, such as an intercircuit conflict, institutional concerns about resources necessary to hear a case en banc, and whether a case should proceed directly to the Supreme Court. This Article presents a detailed description of reasons judges offer each other as they seek to have a case taken en banc or argue against such rehearing after a three-judge panel has filed its decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, July 16, 2021
    The Complex and Courageous Campaign for Women's Suffrage and Parity in Our Democracy: Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment 21-103 Friday, July 16, 2021 presented by The South Carolina Bar -Continuing Legal Education Division And American Bar Association Judicial Division SC Supreme Court Commission on CLE Course No. 217670 1 Table of Contents Agenda ...................................................................................................................................................3 Speaker Biographies .............................................................................................................................4 A Historical Overview of Women’s Suffrage ....................................................................................15 Professor Marjorie Spruill Race, Class, and Gender in Suffrage Movement ...............................................................................16 Professor Marjorie Sruill, Professor Paula Monopoli, Professor Tracy Thomas Benched: The Right to Vote and the Right to Rule ..........................................................................28 The Honorable J. Michelle Childs, The Honorable Jean H. Toal, The Honorable Bernette Johnson, The Honorable Eva Guzman The Military and Women: One Hundred Years of Changes Through the Rule of Law, Service and Sacrifice .........................................................................................................................................29 The Honorable James Lockemy, Lt. Col. Tally Parham
    [Show full text]
  • Trial, Appellate, and Committee Work in the South Pacific Stephen L
    Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 45 | Issue 3 Article 3 September 2015 Judging and Administration for Far-Off lP aces: Trial, Appellate, and Committee Work in the South Pacific Stephen L. Wasby University at Albany - SUNY Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev Part of the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Stephen L. Wasby, Judging and Administration for Far-Off Places: Trial, Appellate, and Committee Work in the South Pacific, 45 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 193 (2015). http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol45/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Golden Gate University Law Review by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wasby: Trial, Appellate, and Committee Work in the South Pacific ARTICLE JUDGING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR FAR-OFF PLACES: TRIAL, APPELLATE, AND COMMITTEE WORK IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC STEPHEN L. WASBY* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................ 194 R A. How the Article Proceeds........................... 196 R B. The Pacific Islands Committee ...................... 197 R II. Guam: Court Structure and Appellate Jurisdiction ........ 200 R A. Guam Appellate Jurisdiction Challenged ............. 202 R III. Judge Goodwin in Guam ............................... 205 R A. Goodwin in Guam, 1994 ........................... 205 R 1. Law Clerk Assistance .......................... 207 R B. Guam, 1995 ....................................... 210 R C. Guam, 1996 ....................................... 212 R 1. A Sidebar: Local Lawyering .................... 216 R D. Review by the Ninth Circuit ........................ 218 R * Professor of Political Science Emeritus, University at Albany - SUNY, residing in Eastham, Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Richard H. Chambers and His Pasadena Courthouse Caleb Langston
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 19, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2006 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all, Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250--$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright C2006, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY COMMEMORATING THE CENTENNIAL OF THE JAMES R. BROWNING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1905-2005 VOLUME 18, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2005 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright 02005, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Clerkship Placements
    JUDICIAL CLERKSHIP PLACEMENTS The following is a sampling of federal and state court judges who have hired UC Davis School of Law students and alumni for post‐graduate clerkships in the last several years. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Arthur L. Alarcon Ninth Circuit Los Angeles, CA Ruggero J. Aldisert Third Circuit Santa Barbara, CA Robert R. Beezer Ninth Circuit Seattle, WA Marsha S. Berzon Ninth Circuit San Francisco, CA Susan H. Black Eleventh Circuit Jacksonville, FL Mary Beck Briscoe Tenth Circuit Lawrence, KS Ferdinand Fernandez Ninth Circuit Pasadena, CA Procter Hug, Jr. Ninth Circuit Reno, NV Carolyn Dineen King Fifth Circuit Houston, TX Paul R. Michel District of Columbia Circuit Washington, D.C. Pauline Newman Federal Circuit Washington, D.C. Harry Pregerson Ninth Circuit Woodland Hills, CA Johnnie B. Rawlinson Ninth Circuit Las Vegas, NV Thomas M. Reavley Fifth Circuit Houston, TX Mary M. Schroeder Ninth Circuit Phoenix, AZ Stanley Birch Eleventh Circuit Atlanta, GA Richard C. Tallman Ninth Circuit Seattle, WA Roger Wollman Eighth Circuit Sioux Falls, SD Staff Attorneys’ Office Eleventh Circuit Atlanta, GA Staff Attorneys’ Office Fourth Circuit Richmond, VA Staff Attorneys’ Office Ninth Circuit San Francisco, CA U.S. DISTRICT COURTS William Alsup Northern District of California San Francisco, CA Micaela Alvarez Southern District of Texas McAllen, TX Gary S. Austin Eastern District of California Fresno, CA Lourdes G. Baird Central District of California Los Angeles, CA Anthony J. Battaglia Southern District of California San Diego, CA Timothy Bommer Eastern District of California Sacramento, CA Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Eastern District of California Sacramento, CA Kathleen Cardone Western District of Texas El Paso, TX Pamela K.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Journal
    OCTOBER TERM, 1981 Reference Index Contents: Page Statistics n General in Appeals in Arguments in Attorneys iv Briefs iv Certiorari v Costs vi Judgments, Mandates and Opinions vi Miscellaneous vni Original Cases vni Parties x Records x Rehearings xi Rules xi Stays and Bail xi Conclusion xi (i) II STATISTICS AS OF JULY 2, 1982 In Forma Paid Original Pauperis Total Cases Cases Number of cases on docket 22 2,935 2,354 5,311 Cases disposed of 6 2,390 2,037 4,433 Remaining on docket 16 545 317 878 Cases docketed during term: Paid cases 2,413 In forma pauperis cases 2,004 Original cases , 5 Total 4,422 Cases remaining from last term 889 Total cases on docket 5,311 Cases disposed of 4,433 Number remaining on docket 878 Petitions for certiorari granted: In paid cases 152 In in forma pauperis cases 7 Appeals granted: In paid cases 51 In in forma pauperis cases 0 Total cases granted plenary review 210 Cases argued during term 184 Number disposed of by full opinions *170 Number disposed of by per curiam opinions **10 Number set for reargument next term 4 Cases available for argument at beginning of term 102 Disposed of summarily after review was granted 8 Original cases set for argument 2 Cases reviewed and decided without oral argument 126 Total cases available for argument at start of next term ***126 Number of written opinions of the Court 141 Opinions per curiam in argued cases **9 Number of lawyers admitted to practice as of October 3, 1982: On written motion 4,077 On oral motion 1,002 Total 5,079 * Includes No.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan M. Cohen
    Jonathan M. Cohen Partner Washington DC +1.202.778.9103 [email protected] OVERVIEW Jonathan Cohen is a partner in the firm's Washington, D.C. office, where he is a member of the insurance coverage practice group. His practice focuses on representing policyholders in obtaining insurance coverage in complex, multiparty disputes involving product liability, product recalls, cyber events, and supply chain issues. Jonathan has worked extensively with food, supplements, technology, and consumer product companies. He has successfully recovered insurance proceeds on behalf of Fortune 500 and smaller companies for a broad array of consumer product risks. He served as lead counsel in numerous matters involving food contamination and recall losses, Proposition 65 claims, cyber-related losses, advertising and IP claims, supply chain losses, and first-party property losses. Jonathan also represents clients in managing their business risks and advises clients with respect to insurance, indemnity agreements, and other contract-related aspects of their risk management strategies. He brings a unique perspective to client counseling, drawing on both his legal experience and his Ph.D. in organizational sociology to advance his clients' business approach to addressing risk. He also regularly represents civil rights organizations and individuals in high-stakes appellate litigation. He has filed briefs for individuals, consumer and policyholder groups, asbestos trusts, and civil rights organizations in more than a dozen U.S. Supreme Court cases, as well as before the Fourth and Ninth Circuit U.S. Courts of Appeal and state high courts. PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND Prior to entering private practice, Jonathan served as a law clerk for Judge Ferdinand Fernandez of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 8, NUMBER 2 SUMMER/FALL 1995 Western Legal History is published semi-annually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, [818) 795-0266. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts-particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, Califomia, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washinl,rton, Guam, and the Northem Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the Society as well as members of affiHated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100- $249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (non-members of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49; Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please. write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of footnotes. Copyright, ©1995, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • COURT',.---------. DIRECTORY MARCH 1987 '. 106091 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization cfiglnating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this c~d material has been granted by Public Domain/Administrative Office of the United states Courts to the National Crimi nat Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of th~ht owner. UNITED STATES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Wa~hington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division " Office of the Chief (202-633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (301-763-1865) The information in this Directory is current as of February I, 1987. TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court . ................................................................................ United States Courts of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit ............................................... "................... 2 First Circuit. .. 4 Second Circuit. .. 5 Third Circuit. .. 8 Fourth Circuit. .. 10 Fifth Circuit ................................................................................. 12 Sixth Circuit ................................................................................
    [Show full text]