DOCSLIB.ORG

1981 Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OCTOBER TERM, 1981 Reference Index Contents: Page Statistics n General in Appeals in Arguments in Attorneys iv Briefs iv Certiorari v Costs vi Judgments, Mandates and Opinions vi Miscellaneous vni Original Cases vni Parties x Records x Rehearings xi Rules xi Stays and Bail xi Conclusion xi (i) II STATISTICS AS OF JULY 2, 1982 In Forma Paid Original Pauperis Total Cases Cases Number of cases on docket 22 2,935 2,354 5,311 Cases disposed of 6 2,390 2,037 4,433 Remaining on docket 16 545 317 878 Cases docketed during term: Paid cases 2,413 In forma pauperis cases 2,004 Original cases , 5 Total 4,422 Cases remaining from last term 889 Total cases on docket 5,311 Cases disposed of 4,433 Number remaining on docket 878 Petitions for certiorari granted: In paid cases 152 In in forma pauperis cases 7 Appeals granted: In paid cases 51 In in forma pauperis cases 0 Total cases granted plenary review 210 Cases argued during term 184 Number disposed of by full opinions *170 Number disposed of by per curiam opinions **10 Number set for reargument next term 4 Cases available for argument at beginning of term 102 Disposed of summarily after review was granted 8 Original cases set for argument 2 Cases reviewed and decided without oral argument 126 Total cases available for argument at start of next term ***126 Number of written opinions of the Court 141 Opinions per curiam in argued cases **9 Number of lawyers admitted to practice as of October 3, 1982: On written motion 4,077 On oral motion 1,002 Total 5,079 * Includes No. 89 Orig. ** Includes No. 81-89 *** Includes No. 81-1810 dismissed under Rule 53 on August 19, 1982. Ill GENERAL: Page Court convened to announce 1981 Term; to release orders and to hear oral arguments October 5, 1981; adjourned October 4, 1982 1,791 Court closed due to snow January 14, 1982. Court took 5 minute recess to consider whether arguments should be cancelled due to weather January 13, 1982 ... 342 Allotment order, nunc pro tunc 96 Fortas, J., argued case (81-328) 500 announcement of death 595 Lee, Rex E., Solicitor General presented to the Court .... 1 Stewart, J. (Retired), designated and assigned to USCA-2 693 USCA-6 95 USCA-7 253 USCA-9 771 Vasil, Christopher W., appointed Deputy Clerk, effective June 1, 1982 693 APPEALS: Appeal from Special Court, Regional Rail Reorganiza- tion Act of 1973, dismissed without prejudice (No. , Haldeman v. United States Railway Association, etal.) 385 Appeal from Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals (81-96) 387 Appeal order issued on non-order list day (81-335) 231 Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, opinion per curiam (80-1576) 342 Further consideration of suggestion of mootness deferred to hearing of case on the merits (81-1064) 704 Motion to dismiss appeal as moot denied (80-6298) 161 Motion to expedite granted in part; judgment vacated in opinion per curiam and judgment issued forthwith; motion to recall judgment denied, rehearing denied (81-1724) 503, 525, 559 Noted appeal, dismissed later pursuant to Rule 53 (81-741) 309 Order dismissing appeal for want of a substantial fed- eral question vacated. Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed (81-240) 137 ARGUMENTS: Cases consolidated for briefing and argument on motion of Solicitor General (81-298 and 81-799) 390 IV AEGUMENTS—Continued Page Case restored to calendar for reargument; motion to schedule argument in tandem with related case denied (81-349) 602, 683 Cases restored to calendar for reargument (80-1832, 80-2170, and 80-2171) 787 Counsel for petitioner and respondent granted leave to argue pro hac vice; argued (81-5321) 392, 504 Court allocated time for oral argument (80-1798, 80-1808 and 81-91) 289 Deferral of oral argument granted; further deferral granted (80-1640 and 80-1656) 212, 801 Divided argument in consolidated cases granted and each of three parties allotted 20 minutes (78-1545 and 80-951) 108 Leave granted counsel to use electronic equipment to in- terpret oral argument; case argued (80-1002) 389, 504 Leave to file affidavits after argument denied (80-1464) ... 161 Leave to schedule oral argument during April 1982 session denied (81-184; 81-825) 544, 545 ATTORNEYS: Counsel appointed (80-1595; 80-1608; 81-213; 81-5114; 80-2205; 80-2195; 81-420; 81-1095; 81-1121; 81-1774) ... 8, 191, 213, 238, 267, 307, 369, 578, 668, 788 Counsel invited to brief and argue in support of judgment below as amicus curiae (80-1285; 81-1 and 81-3). 140, 544 Dissenting opinion issued on application for admission (No. , In the Matter of Admission of Leda M. C. HartweU) 388 (No. In the Matter of Admission of William Evans Benton; and No. , In the Matter of Admission of Michael T. Rose) 458 BRIEFS: Amicus curiae brief signed by 49 states filed (80-2178) Leave denied certain appellants to file separate brief and joint appendix (Attorney General of State permitted to file brief for all appellants) (81-1578) 803 Leave to file reply brief in excess of page limitations denied (81-395) 509 Leave to file supplemental brief as amicus curiae denied (80-2162; 81-451) 544 V BRIEFS—Continued Page Leave to strike brief denied without prejudice to appellees filing a response (81-325) 161 Motion to defer briefing and oral argument denied (81-184) 308 Motion to enlarge questions presented denied (81-184) 308 Motion to strike portions of petitioner's reply brief denied (81-5321) 509 Parties allowed 5 days to respond to suggestion that cases are not ripe (81-1282 and 81-1283) 343 Jurisdiction postponed, certiorari before judgment grant- ed, and cases consolidated; stay of declaratory judgment of USDC entered (81-1282, 81-1283, 81-1312 and 81-1313) 370 Time to file motions to dismiss or affirm shortened (81- 1068) 290 CERTIORARI: Certiorari before judgment denied (81-1626) 557 Certiorari granted limited to question framed by Court (81-1945) 736 Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by petition; writ dismissed pursuant to Rule 53 on August 19, 1982 (81-1810) 621 Certiorari granted; parties directed to address question whether Court should reconsider Robbins v. California (80-2209) 112 Certiorari granted. Judgment (USCA) vacated and case remanded with instructions that case be consolidated with ongoing USDC proceeding. Opinion per curiam (81-1097) 683 Certiorari granted. Judgment (USCA) vacated and case remanded with directions to instruct USDC to dismiss limited aspect of case as moot based upon letter from counsel for respondent (81-1098) 458 Certiorari granted. Judgment (USCA) vacated and case remanded with directions to instruct USDC to dismiss petition for habeas corpus (81-1038; 81-5047) 457, 458 Cross-petitions dismissed pursuant to Rule 53 (81-1099 and 81^884) on January 12, 1982. Grant of certiorari amended and limited to 2 questions pre- sented by petition (80-2116) 267 Leave to amend or enlarge questions presented after grant of certiorari denied (81-430; 81-680 and 81-1076) .... 438, 602 VI CERTIORARI—Continued page Motion to defer consideration of petition granted (rehear- ing en banc granted by USCA) (81-876) 438 Motion to dismiss writ denied (80-1714) 306 Motion to dismiss writ as improvidently granted denied (80-1417; 81^60; 81-535) 140, 391 Motion to recall writ denied (81-440) 238 Order denying certiorari amended to show that a Justice would grant certiorari (81-5873) 579 Out-of-time petition for certiorari granted (81-5152) 163 Petition granted limited to Question 2 and case summarily disposed of in opinion per curiam (81-271) 235 Petition to Special Court, Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (81-792) 314 Suggestion of mootness rejected (81-1222) 602 COSTS: Motion for approval of attorney's fees denied without prej- udice to applying for relief in USCA (80-2128) 735 Motion for award of costs, damages and expenses denied (81-447) 348 Motion for damages and double costs denied (81-1631) 577 Motion not to tax costs denied (80-1121) 438 JUDGMENTS, MANDATES AND OPINIONS: Judgments: Judgment affirmed by equally divided Court (80-847 and 80-1067; 80-1690) 363, 504 Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part; case remanded to USCA for entry of modified judgment in conformity with judgment of this Court (80-1348) 783 Judgment and opinion of USCA vacated. Appeal dis- missed for want of jurisdiction (81-255) 303 Judgment issued forthwith in opinion of Court (80-2043) 757 Judgment reversed to extent it sustains imposition of death penalty (80-5727) 363 Judgment stayed until October 4, 1982 to afford Con- gress time to remedy constitutional deficiency an- nounced in opinion of Court (81-150 and 81-546) .. 777 Judgment (USCA) reversed and remanded in light of 1973 opinion in opinion per curiam (80-2077) 211 vn JUDGMENTS, MANDATES AND OPINIONS—Continued Page Judgments—Continued Judgment (USCA) reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate dismissal judgment (80-1377) 263 Judgment (State) vacated and remanded in light of state court decision (81-247) 108 Judgment (USCA) vacated and remanded in light of new federal statute (81-397; 80-2086) 138, 236 Judgment (USCA) vacated and remanded in light of new state statute (80-1872) 6 Judgment (USCA) vacated and remanded with direc- tions to instruct USDC to dismiss complaint with prejudice (81-774 and 81-1511) 786 Judgment (USCA) vacated and remanded with in- structions to remand to Federal Reserve Board to vacate its decision (81-176) 288 Judgment (USCA) vacated and remanded (USDC) with instructions to dismiss habeas corpus petition (81-23) 303 Judgment (USCA) vacated and remanded (respec- tive USDC's) with directions to dismiss cases as moot when parties jointly so move
Recommended publications
  • Libro ING CAC1-36:Maquetación 1.Qxd

    Libro ING CAC1-36:Maquetación 1.Qxd

    © Enrique Montesinos, 2013 © Sobre la presente edición: Organización Deportiva Centroamericana y del Caribe (Odecabe) Edición y diseño general: Enrique Montesinos Diseño de cubierta: Jorge Reyes Reyes Composición y diseño computadorizado: Gerardo Daumont y Yoel A. Tejeda Pérez Textos en inglés: Servicios Especializados de Traducción e Interpretación del Deporte (Setidep), INDER, Cuba Fotos: Reproducidas de las fuentes bibliográficas, Periódico Granma, Fernando Neris. Los elementos que componen este volumen pueden ser reproducidos de forma parcial siem- pre que se haga mención de su fuente de origen. Se agradece cualquier contribución encaminada a completar los datos aquí recogidos, o a la rectificación de alguno de ellos. Diríjala al correo [email protected] ÍNDICE / INDEX PRESENTACIÓN/ 1978: Medellín, Colombia / 77 FEATURING/ VII 1982: La Habana, Cuba / 83 1986: Santiago de los Caballeros, A MANERA DE PRÓLOGO / República Dominicana / 89 AS A PROLOGUE / IX 1990: Ciudad México, México / 95 1993: Ponce, Puerto Rico / 101 INTRODUCCIÓN / 1998: Maracaibo, Venezuela / 107 INTRODUCTION / XI 2002: San Salvador, El Salvador / 113 2006: Cartagena de Indias, I PARTE: ANTECEDENTES Colombia / 119 Y DESARROLLO / 2010: Mayagüez, Puerto Rico / 125 I PART: BACKGROUNG AND DEVELOPMENT / 1 II PARTE: LOS GANADORES DE MEDALLAS / Pasos iniciales / Initial steps / 1 II PART: THE MEDALS WINNERS 1926: La primera cita / / 131 1926: The first rendezvous / 5 1930: La Habana, Cuba / 11 Por deportes y pruebas / 132 1935: San Salvador, Atletismo / Athletics
  • Digital USFSP

    Digital USFSP

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Special Collections and University Archives Finding Aids and Research Guides for Finding Aids: All Items Manuscript and Special Collections 4-1-2006 Papers of Hazel A. Talley Evans : A Collection Guide Nelson Poynter Memorial Library. Special Collections and University Archives. James Anthony Schnur Laura Woodruff Susan Hickok 1947-2008 Hazel Talley Evans 1931-1997. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scua_finding_aid_all Part of the Archival Science Commons Scholar Commons Citation Nelson Poynter Memorial Library. Special Collections and University Archives.; Schnur, James Anthony; Woodruff, Laura; Hickok, Susan 1947-2008; and Evans, Hazel Talley 1931-1997., "Papers of Hazel A. Talley Evans : A Collection Guide" (2006). Special Collections and University Archives Finding Aids: All Items. 34. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/scua_finding_aid_all/34 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the Finding Aids and Research Guides for Manuscript and Special Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Collections and University Archives Finding Aids: All Items by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Papers of Hazel A. Talley Evans A Collection Guide by J im S chnur Assistant Librarian Laura W oodruff and S usan H ickok Archives Interns S pecial Collections and Archives N elson Poynter M em orial Library U niversity of S outh Florida S t. Petersburg April 2006 Introduction to the Collection The Nelson Poynter Memorial Library acquired the papers of Hazel A. Talley Evans (16 August 1931-10 December 1997) in December 2001 from Robert Winfield “Bob” Evans (1924-2005), her second husband.
  • Presentation Evening

    Presentation Evening

    Victoria Police Amateur Sports & Welfare Society 2016 Victoria Police Sports Awards Presentation Evening Tuesday 6th September, 2016 Moonee Valley Racing Club, Sitting in the Celebrity Room of the Moonee Valley Racing, two tables of club members were in for quite a night. Not surprisingly, it was somewhat hard to recognise some members in ‘After Five’ dress. Waste deep in mud or snow winching bogged cars; covered in dust or sand; hesitantly poking river crossings or snaking up mountain tracks or around valleys for a tasty picnic is more the norm. The humming around the large room as old acquaintances Russell Mark, OAM renewed friendships eased when Master of Ceremonies, World Champion Trap shooting Olympic gold medallist Russell Mark introduced the first of the 6 Olympic Games, G & S three Guest Speakers. C’wealth Games, G & B All were most informative and entertaining as they reminisced how they made their way to the top of their individual pyramids and future outlooks. Michelle Payne Simplice Ribouem Chris Naish First female jockey to win the 2016 Olympic AFL footballer and CEO of the Melbourne Cup weightlifter REACH FOUNDATION Throughout the night, recognition Awards were accepted by sportsmen and women, team captains and administrators, scholarship and Life Member inductees. Under Russell’s MC expertise, presentations were completed smoothly and efficiently and after a tasty supper suddenly the clock showed the night was over. A good time was had by all. Most Outstanding Individual Police Sporting or Welfare Achievement of the Year - Awarded to the Four Wheel Drive Clubs 'Blue Green Crew' project created by Marcus Nash which provided 200 Defence, Police & Emergency Services members a chance to get away from the stresses of serious work life.
  • Electronic Surveillance, the Mafia and Individual Freedom Benjamin M

    Electronic Surveillance, the Mafia and Individual Freedom Benjamin M

    Louisiana Law Review Volume 42 | Number 4 Summer 1982 Electronic Surveillance, the Mafia and Individual Freedom Benjamin M. Shieber Louisiana State University Law Center Repository Citation Benjamin M. Shieber, Electronic Surveillance, the Mafia and Individual Freedom, 42 La. L. Rev. (1982) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol42/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, THE MAFIA, AND INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM* Benjamin M. Shieber** I. INTRODUCTION The United States Constitution affects the ability of federal, state and local governments to combat criminal activity. Since the relevant constitutional provisions are in the form of broadly stated legal commands,' the constitutionality of specific law enforcement practices can only be determined when the courts, ultimately the Supreme Court of the United States, interpret these commands in cases in which they are challenged. As has long been recognized, the judicial role in the interpretation process is a creative one, for when conflicting policies compete for ac- ceptance, a court's interpretation will further one policy at the expense of another.' The court's policy preference can only be rational and respon- sible when it is based on "considerations of what is expedient for the community concerned."'3 This requires the court to know the communi- ty, determine how implementation of each competing policy would af- fect it, and choose the policy of greatest utility for that community.' Cases involving electronic surveillance' by law enforcement agen- * Copyright 1982, Benjamin M.
  • Athletics at the 1987 Pan American Games - Wikipedia

    Athletics at the 1987 Pan American Games - Wikipedia

    27/4/2020 Athletics at the 1987 Pan American Games - Wikipedia Athletics at the 1987 Pan American Games The Athletics competition at the 1987 Pan American Games was held in Indianapolis, United States. The events were competed at the IU Indianapolis Track Athletics at the and Soccer Stadium. 1987 Pan American Games Contents Medal summary Men's events Women's events Medal table Host venue (shown in 2012) See also Dates 9–16 August References Host Indianapolis, United States city Medal summary Venue IU Indianapolis Track and Soccer Stadium Level Senior Men's events Events 43 ← Caracas 1983 Havana 1991 → 1987 Pan American Games https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athletics_at_the_1987_Pan_American_Games 1/7 27/4/2020 Athletics at the 1987 Pan American Games - Wikipedia Event Gold Silver Bronze Patrick Lee McRae Ray Stewart Juan Núñez 100 metres Wesche United 10.26 10.27 Dominican 10.44 10.49 (wind: -3.4 m/s) States Jamaica Republic Chile Wallace 200 metres Floyd Heard Robson da Spearmon (wind: United 20.25 Silva 20.49 20.53 United +1.3 m/s) States Brazil States Raymond Bert Roberto Pierre Cameron 400 metres 44.60 44.72 Hernández 45.13 United Cuba States Jamaica Johnny José Luíz Stanley Gray Redwine 800 metres 1:46.79 Barbosa 1:47.37 1:47.73 United Brazil United States States Joaquim Jim Spivey Steve Scott 1500 metres Cruz 3:47.34 United 3:47.46 United 3:47.76 Brazil States States Arturo Adauto Omar Aguilar 5000 metres Barrios 13:31.40 Domingues 13:46.41 13:47.86 Chile Mexico Brazil Bruce Rolando 10,000 Bickford Vera Paul McCloy 28:20.37 28:22.56
  • District Clerk

    District Clerk

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,.p.l I r r " 28 2 5 1.0 :: 11111 . _ 11111 . 3 2 I IIIII~~ n~M1. 11111 - . 3 6 Ik\ 11111 . BOO 4 0 Ii'-2. 001,I~. • 0 I• I :ij'",li IIIII~~ 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 150mm ->-----~-..... 6" UNI,TED STATES COURT. DIRECTORY Sf March 1, 1986 U.S. DepFrtment of Justice Natlonallnstitute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originallng it. Points of view or opinions staled in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ~l:lted material has been granted by • • Publlc DOmaln Lnllted States Court Directory to the National Criminal JUstice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ " ) sion of the epp.y.ri:ght owner. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 I 053 03 • UNITED STATES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division Office of the Chief (633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (763-1865) • • The information in this Directory is current as of March I, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court ...................................................................................................................... • United
  • STATE of MINNESOTA Office of Governor Mark Dayton 116 Veterans Service Building ♦ 20 West 12Th Street ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155

    STATE of MINNESOTA Office of Governor Mark Dayton 116 Veterans Service Building ♦ 20 West 12Th Street ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155

    STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of Governor Mark Dayton 116 Veterans Service Building ♦ 20 West 12th Street ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155 September 23, 2014 The Honorable Jack Dalrymple Governor 600 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, North Dakota 58505 Dear Governor Dalrymple: I am writing to urge you and the other Members of the North Dakota Industrial Commission to quickly establish oil conditioning standards that will decrease the volatility of Bakken oil being exported from North Dakota Minnesota is one of the primary routes for this highly volatile oil; however, our state receives little direct benefit from its transport. Instead, Minnesotans experience the greatly increased risks in the event of a derailment. The amount of Bakken crude oil being shipped through Minnesota has increased dramatically since 2009. Currently, hundreds of rail cars on about seven trains, which carry more than 23 million gallons of crude oil, pass through Minnesota every day. These train movements have significant impacts on almost 3.5 million of the state's 5 million residents who live in communities along Bakken oil train routes. We are told that the volume of crude oil being shipped through Minnesota will continue to increase over the next decade. In Minnesota, we are doing our part to ensure the safety and security of our citizens and the communities in which they live. Last spring, I signed into law comprehensive prevention and emergency response improvements. However, only the State of North Dakota has direct control over the safety of the products being shipped into our state. I recognize the challenge of regulating an industry that has so rapidly expanded in your state and your obligation to support your state's thriving economy.
  • Auction Menu

    Auction Menu

    ON EACH ITEM AND BID ONCE BOLD BID SE YOUR CHANCE OF W LY NCREA INNIN TO I G. It’s easy! BID FROM YOUR SEAT IN THIS BOOKLET! THE GREATEST SHOW CHARITY BALL IN SUPPORT OF SATURDAY 23 FEBRUARY 2019 @ CROWN PALLADIUM AUCTION MENU WELCOME TO Bid BOLDLY BOLD to ensure you are the highest BIDS bidder! Each lot can be BID on once. Make your HIGHEST bid. In some cases more than one of each lot is available, so two or more highest bidders will win. This auction is proudly supported and managed by Gala Fundraising; Fundraising Auction Specialists 1300 85 27 55 WESTERN BULLDOGS WAFL signed 2018 team Guernsey. BID ONCE! BID BOLDLY! Premiers in 2018! Lot No 1 – Starting Price $350 YARRA VALLEY WINERY & LUNCH Tour for up to 8 people MY BID $ in a PRIVATE LIMOUSINE. Step out in style with your group of 8, travelling across the Yarra Valley and indulging in 3 wine tastings plus a delectable 2-course lunch with wine at a renowned kitchen at one of the Valley’s stunning boutique wineries. MCG Corporate Box for 5 people. Arrive like VIP’s and be treated like one across this incredible journey. Select from a range of available matches. Valued at approx. $2,000. Stunning views matched with an incredible dining experience. Conditions: Valid for 6 months from date of purchase. Bookings subject to availability, Lot No 2 – Starting Price $1,000 from Monday - Thursday. Additional $399 for weekends when available. MY BID $ Lot No 4 – Starting Price $2,350 MY BID $ GOLD CLASS PRIVATE CINEMA for 24 People at CROWN Village Cinemas! The BIG SCREEN all to yourself! Hire ONLY.
  • Case No. 09-2473 in the United States Court of Appeals

    Case No. 09-2473 in the United States Court of Appeals

    Case: 09-2473 Document: 00116058015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2010 Entry ID: 5443428 CASE NO. 09-2473 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HANOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. Defendants-Appellees, On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (District Court #1:07-cv-356) APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF MICHAEL NEWDOW ROSANNA FOX Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for Plaintiffs PO BOX 233345 12 ELDORADO CIRCLE SACRAMENTO, CA 95823 NASHUA, NH 03062 (916) 424-2356 (603) 318-8479 [email protected] [email protected] Case: 09-2473 Document: 00116058015 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2010 Entry ID: 5443428 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 ARGUMENT.......................................................................................................3 I. “God” means “God” ...........................................................................4 II. The “Power, Prestige and Financial Support of Government” Has Real Consequences............................................14 III. The Organizations Which Have Involved Themselves in this Case Demonstrate that the Case is About (Christian) Monotheism........................................................................................15 IV. Congress’ 2002 Reaffirmation of the Pledge was a Sham
  • Mterrogatory No. 3

    Mterrogatory No. 3

    i I- BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELjECTlON COMMISSION In the Matter of ) Witness Subpoena to ) m 3774 The National Right to) Work Committee ) SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO SUBPOENA The National Right to Work Committee (WRTWC), hereby submits this Supplemental Response to the Subpoena ?o Produce Documents/Order to Submit Written Answers served upcln “WC in the above-referenced MUR, following the June 10,1997, decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Misc. Action No. 97-0160, ordering NRWC to respond to Interrogatory No. 3 and Document Request No. 3, as modified by the Court. INTRODUCTORY COAKMENTS Intemgatory No. 3 and Document Request No. 3 relate to activities from more than four years ago. NRTWC has experienced changes in personnel over those years, and documents may no longer exist, if they ever existed. Nonetheless, “WC, with the assistance of counsel and staff, has conducted a diligent search for documents and facts, and responds on the basis of information so gathered. The Court limited the scope of Interrogatory No. 3 and Document Request No. 3 to the 1992 senatorial candidates, and the Commission, by its attorneys in discussions with “WC counsel, has further limited the scope to the 1992 general election senatorial candidates. Thus, NRTWC’s search has focused on the 1992 general election senatorial candidates. Also, the Commission and NRTWC, in briefing and in discussions between counsel, have agreed that NRTWC may redact documents to delete supporter-identitjing information from documents to be produced, and NRTWC is doing so. MTERROGATORY NO. 3 NRlwC did not engage in, or finance, in whole or in pa, “any activities relating to federal elections in October-December 1992 .
  • SPRING 2014 May 16-18 ® University Dignitaries and Invited Speakers Charles W

    SPRING 2014 May 16-18 ® University Dignitaries and Invited Speakers Charles W

    ® 143RD yeaR of the UNIveRSIty May 16-18 SPRING 2014 VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT UNIveRSIty DIGNItaRIeS aND INvIteD SPeakeRS Charles W. Steger, President, Virginia Tech J. Thomas Brown, Jr., Dean of Students The Honorable Terence “Terry” McAuliffe, Governor Tyler O. Walters, Dean of University Libraries of the Commonwealth of Virginia, keynote Speaker, Rosemary Blieszner, Associate Dean of the Graduate School University Commencement Muhammad R. Hajj, Associate Dean of the Graduate School Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, Executive Director, American Civil Kenneth H. Wong, Associate Dean of the Graduate School Liberties Union of Virginia, keynote Speaker, Graduate in the National Capital Region and Director of the Northern School Commencement Virginia Center The Honorable Karen R. Jackson, Secretary of Technology, Sarah M. Karpanty, Assistant Department Head, Fish and Commonwealth of Virginia, keynote Speaker, National Wildlife Conservation, Commencement Marshal, Capital Region Commencement University and Graduate School Commencements G. Robert Quisenberry, President of Quisenberry & Warren Joseph S. Merola, Professor, Department of Chemistry, Ltd., Class of 1962, William H. Ruffner Medal Award Reader of Names, Graduate School Commencement Recipient Andrea Jean Tiwari, Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Graduate Robert Lewis Turner, Retired Architect formerly with Student Marshal, Graduate School Commencement Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill, LLP, Class of 1972, Shernita Lee, Ph.D. in Genetics, Bioinformatics and University Distinguished Achievement Award Recipient Computational Biology, Graduate Student Speaker, Curry A. Roberts, Principal of Hirschler Fleischer Consulting Graduate School Commencement LLC, Class of 1980, Alumni Distinguished Service Award Mordecai M. Harvey, doctoral student, Human Nutrition, Recipient Foods, and Exercise, Vice President, Graduate Student Wayne H. Robinson, Senior Client Partner and Chief Assembly Diversity Practice Leader, Wyndham Mills International, Jordan A.
  • Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L

    Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L

    Hastings Law Journal Volume 63 | Issue 3 Article 3 3-2012 Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L. Wasby Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen L. Wasby, Why Sit En Banc?, 63 Hastings L.J. 747 (2012). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol63/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. Wasby_63-HLJ-747 (Do Not Delete) 3/26/2012 5:28 PM Why Sit En Banc? Stephen L. Wasby* U.S. courts of appeals seldom provide reasons for granting or denying rehearing en banc. The most likely reason for rehearing en banc is that other judges believe the three-judge panel deciding the case had erred, although rehearing is not sought each time judges disagree with a panel. The formal bases for rehearing a case en banc include the three desiderata of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35—conflict with circuit precedent (intracircuit conflict), conflict with Supreme Court rulings, and presence of an issue of “exceptional importance”—and courts’ rules and general orders. Judges introduce other considerations, such as an intercircuit conflict, institutional concerns about resources necessary to hear a case en banc, and whether a case should proceed directly to the Supreme Court. This Article presents a detailed description of reasons judges offer each other as they seek to have a case taken en banc or argue against such rehearing after a three-judge panel has filed its decision.