DOCSLIB.ORG

BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT for the LUCAS Creek PROJECT KERN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biological Assessment- Lucas Creek Project BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT For the LUCAS Creek PROJECT KERN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST Kern County, California PREPARED By:--J; �ATE: February 5, 2018 Nina Hemphi Forest Fish Biologist/Aquatic Ecologist and Watershed Manager This Biological Assessment analyzes the potential impacts associated with implementation of the Lucas Creek Project on federal endangered and threatened species as identified under the Endangered Species Act. The environmental analysis evaluates the preferred alternative. The Lucas Creek Project includes removal of dead and dying trees on 250 acres on Breckenridge Mountain. The project area is located in sections 23, 24, 25, & 26, township 28 south, range 31 east, Mount Diablo Base Meridian on the Kern River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest. The project surrounds the Breckenridge subdivision on Breckenridge Mountain approximately 25 miles southwest of the town of Lake Isabella in Kern County California. The intent of the Lucas Creek Project is to remove hazard trees along roads and properties adjoining the Breckenridge Subdivision. The project would also reduce fuels build-up to protect the community and the Lucas Creek upper and middle watershed from high-intensity fire. This will improve forest resilience and watershed health. This document is prepared in compliance with the requirements of FSM 2672.4 and 36 CFR 219.19. Biological Assessment- Lucas Creek Project I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Biological Assessment (BA) is to review the potential effects of Lucas Creek Project on species classified as federally endangered and threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA, 1973). Federally listed species are managed under the authority of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the National Forest Management Act (NFMA; PL 94- 588). The ESA requires federal agencies to ensure that no actions are likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally listed species. The ESA requires that a BA be written and that the analysis conducted determine whether formal consultation or conference is required with the United States Department of Interior (USDI) Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). This BA is prepared in compliance with the legal requirements set forth under Section 7 of the ESA as amended (19 U.S.C 1536 (c)) and follows the standards established in Forest Service Manual direction (FSM 2672.42), and also provides for compliance with Code of Federal Regulations 50CFR402.12. The US Fish and Wildlife Service IPAC site was used to obtain an official species list of federally threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species with potential to occur within the vicinity of the Lucas Creek Project area (Consultation Code:, 08ESMF00-2017-SLI-3117, September I, 2017). This list fulfills the requirement to provide a current species list, pursuant to Section 7.c. of the ESA. The list was updated December 19, 2017; Event Code: 08ESMF00- 20I8-E-02019. The species with potential to occur in or near the Lucas Creek Project Area are listed in Table I. Nine Threatened, Endangered, and/or Candidate species were identified by USFWS as occurring in or near the area. These included the San Joaquin Kit Fox, Tipton Kangaroo, California Condor, Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, Mountain Yellow-legged Frog Northern Distinct Population Segment, California Red-legged Frog, the Delta smelt, the Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth, and the Bakersfield Cactus. No Critical Habitats are within or near the project area. Table I. Federally Threatened, Endangered, and Proposed Species potentially in Lucas Creek p ro1.ec tV'1cm1ty .. Common Name Listing Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Analyzed in (Scientific Name) Status near Project Detail in BA? Tipton kangaroo rat FE Alkali sinks and valley None. Outside elevation No, ou tside known (Dipodomys floor habitat. range of species range. nitratoides) San Joaquin kit fox FE Valley floor annual None. Outside elevation No, outside known (Vulpes macrotis grassland, generally range of species range. mutica) below 1,000 feet. SW willow flycatcher FE Vegetation alongside South Fork Kern Wildlife Yes (Empidonax troi/ii rivers, streams, or Area contains critical extimus) other wetlands habitat; occurs up to 8,000 (riparian habitat). feet. Within range for this Neotropical migrant. California condor FE Mountain and foothill Yes, possibility of foraging Yes (Gymnogyps or overflight, no current californianus) roosting or nesting nearby 2 Biological Assessment- Lucas Creek Project rangeland and forest habitats; nests on cliffs and in very large trees California red -legged FT Low gradient streams None. Outside elevation No, outside known frog (Rana aurora and ponds with range of species range. draytonii) emergent Vegetation. Mountain yellow- FE Permanent and Yes, Lucas Creek and the Yes legged frog (Rana intermittent streams meadows within project - muscosa) and meadows above boundaries contain 4500 feet. suitable habitat for MYLF Delta smelt FT Limited to San Joaquin/ None. No outlet from the No, outside known (Hypomesus Sacramento Delta. Kern River to the Delta range. transpacificus) Kern Primrose Sphinx FT Limited to Walker None. Outside elevation No, outside known Moth (Euproserpinus Basin, Carrizo Plain and range of species range. euterpe) Cuyama Valley Bakersfield Cactus FE Saltbush scrub, at None. Outside elevation No, outside known (Opuntia treleasei) elevations from 460 to range of species range. 1,800 feet. Kern Canyon slender UR Ephemeral, Yes, Lucas Creek tributaries Yes salamander intermittent, and and their riparian areas (Batrachoseps perennial streams and contain habitat. simatus) their riparian areas. FE Federally Endangered; FT Federally Threatened, UR Under Review II CONSULTATION TO DATE Southwestern Willow Flycatcher The Southwestern Willow Flycatcher was listed as endangered in February, 1995 (Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 38 0698/ February 27, 1995). Basin and Mohave Recovery Unit show the South Fork Kern River (Critical Habitat #7 Federal Register Vol. 62, No. 140 July 22, 1997). In 2013, the Kern Management Unit extended Critical Habitat from Lake Isabella to Canebrake Creek (Federal Register Vol. 78, No. 2 January 3, 2013). Since the listing of the South West Willow Flycatcher, the Forest has conducted both formal and informal consultations with the USFWS on a variety of projects. The last formal consultation was conducted in February 20 I 3 for the Giant Sequoia National Monument EIS (08ESMF00- 20 l 2-F-0429- I). California Condor The California condor (Gymnogyps cal(fornianus) was listed as endangered on March I I, 1967 (32 Federal Register (FR) 400 I), with critical habitats designated on September 24, 1976 (41 FR 187) within Tulare, Kern, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties. Designated critical habitats closest to the project vicinity include the Kern County Rangelands (Critical Habitat #8 USFWS I 996) and the Tejon Ranch (Critical Habitat #7). Both are 3 Biological Assessment- Lucas Creek Project considered important foraging zones located northwest and southwest of the Lucas Creek Project area. Neither of these designated critical habitats overlap with any portion of the Lucas Creek Project area. Since the listing of the California condor, the Forest has conducted both formal and informal consultations with the USFWS on a variety of projects. The last formal consultation was conducted in February 2013 for the Giant Sequoia National Monument EIS (08ESMF00-2012-F- 0429-1 ). Mountain Yellow-legged Frog Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa, Northern Distinct Population Segment NDPS) was listed as an endangered species (Federal Register: Vol. 79 No. 82 24255 April 29, 2014). Critical habitat was designated for this species (Federal Register: Vol. 81 No. I 66, 59046 August 26, 2016). None of the areas identified for critical habitat designation occur within the Lucas Creek Project area. A programmatic Biological Assessment (BA) was completed by the Pacific Southwest Regional Office of the Forest Service for the three Sierra Amphibians proposed for federal listing. The Programmatic BA and the US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion were signed in 2014. The Regional BA and the USFWS Biological Opinion (FF08ESMF00- 2014-F-0557) are incorporated by reference for this analysis. Relictual Slender Salamander The Relictual (Batrachoseps re/ictus) Slender Salamanders (Batrachoseps simatus) is Under Review as a result of a 90 Substantial Finding on a Petition to List this species (Federal Register: Vol. 80 No. 126, 37568 July I, 2015). US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) initiated a review of the status of this and other species to determine if the petitioned actions are warranted. III. CURRENT ANAGEMENT DIRECTION Direction regarding threatened, endangered, or proposed species is provided in the Forest Service Manual (FSM 2672.1 & 2672), the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 219.19), the Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) (USDA 1988), the 1990 Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA), the 2004 Final Supplemental Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (SNFPA, USDA 2004), the Endangered Species Act, species specific recovery plans, and Regional Forester policy and management direction. The 2004 SNFPA standards and guidelines applicable to the listed species under consideration in this Biological Assessment support the retention of structural attributes of suitable habitat important for the
Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Design Documentation

    Conceptual Design Documentation

    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
  • California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group

    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group

    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group FAIRVIEW SLENDER SALAMANDER Batrachoseps bramei Family: PLETHODONTIDAE Order: CAUDATA Class: AMPHIBIA A073 Written by: T. Kucera, 1997 Updated by: CWHR Staff May 2013 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY Yearlong resident in the western slope of the southern Sierra Nevada. Individuals occur along streams and in moist wooded canyons in valley foothill riparian habitats, blue oak woodlands, and Sierra mixed conifer woodlands (Yanev 1978). Brame and Murray (1968) included salamanders from four disjunct regions, including the southern Sierra Nevada, in B. pacificus. Jennings and Hayes (1994) elevated the animals from the southern Sierra Nevada to specific status (B. relictus). Then, on the basis of DNA analyses (Jockusch 1996, Jockusch et al. 1998), the B. relictus complex was split out into four distinct species: B. relictus, B. regius, B. kawia and B. diabolicus. Jockusch et al. (2012) documented morphological and molecular data to support the recognition of B. bramei as a species distinct from B. relictus. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Feeding probably occurs both above and below ground (Hendrickson 1954). Stebbins (1951) reported that a similar species, the pacific slender salamander (B. pacficus), fed on earthworms, small slugs, a variety of terrestrial arthropods including sowbugs and millipedes, and insects including collembolans, aphids, caterpillars, small beetles, beetle larvae, and ants. The fairview slender salamander probably eats a similar array of prey items. Cover: Members of the genus Batrachoseps do not usually excavate burrows. They rely on passages made by other animals, or produced by root decay or soil shrinkage (Yanev 1978).
  • Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth DRAFT Recovery Plan

    Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth DRAFT Recovery Plan

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. http://fwie.fw.vt.edu/WWW/esis/lists/e501006.htm (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species MOTH, SPHINX, KERN PRIMROSE Species Id ESIS501006 Date 13 MAR 96 TAXONOMY NAME - MOTH, SPHINX, KERN PRIMROSE OTHER COMMON NAMES - MOTH, SPHINX and KERN PRIMROSE ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Terrestrial Insects PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - ARTHROPODA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - INSECTA, ORDER AND SUBORDER - LEPIDOPTERA, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - SPHINGIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - EUPROSERPINUS, SPECIES AND SSP - EUTERPE, SCIENTIFIC NAME - EUPROSERPINUS EUTERPE AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth Euproserpinus euterpe Hy. Edwards, 1888 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Insect PHYLUM: Arthropoda CLASS: Insecta ORDER: Lepidoptera FAMILY: Sphingidae Euproserpinus euterpe Henry Edwards 1888 (06) is a small, day flying sphinx moth in the genus Euproserpinus that is shared by only two other species. These are E. wiesti and E. phaeton (01). E. euterpe is distinguished by the "labial palpus that is mixed pale and dark gray, not bordered dorsally with a distinct black line; middle portion of the forewing with numerous, transverse lines and dark gray pattern (02)." The following is taken from the Recovery Plan (01): The type specimen of E. euterpe was collected by H. K. Morrison and given to Henry Edwards to describe. Edwards (1888) gave the type locality as San Diego County; however, this is certainly incorrect. Edwards published so many incorrect type localities for material he had received from Morrison that Morrison felt compelled to publish a short note Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species MOTH, SPHINX, KERN PRIMROSE Species Id ESIS501006 Date 13 MAR 96 in 1883 correcting the errors Edwards had made.
  • Sensitive Species of Snakes, Frogs, and Salamanders in Southern California Conifer Forest Areas: Status and Management1

    Sensitive Species of Snakes, Frogs, and Salamanders in Southern California Conifer Forest Areas: Status and Management1

    Sensitive Species of Snakes, Frogs, and Salamanders in Southern California Conifer Forest Areas: Status and Management1 Glenn R. Stewart2, Mark R. Jennings3, and Robert H. Goodman, Jr.4 Abstract At least 35 species of amphibians and reptiles occur regularly in the conifer forest areas of southern California. Twelve of them have some or all of their populations identified as experiencing some degree of threat. Among the snakes, frogs, and salamanders that we believe need particular attention are the southern rubber boa (Charina bottae umbratica), San Bernardino mountain kingsnake (Lampropeltis zonata parvirubra), San Diego mountain kingsnake (L.z. pulchra), California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii), mountain yellow-legged frog (R. muscosa), San Gabriel Mountain slender salamander (Batrachoseps gabrieli), yellow-blotched salamander (Ensatina eschscholtzii croceater), and large-blotched salamander (E.e. klauberi). To varying degrees, these taxa face threats of habitat degradation and fragmentation, as well as a multitude of other impacts ranging from predation by alien species and human collectors to reduced genetic diversity and chance environmental catastrophes. Except for the recently described San Gabriel Mountain slender salamander, all of these focus taxa are included on Federal and/or State lists of endangered, threatened, or special concern species. Those not federally listed as Endangered or Threatened are listed as Forest Service Region 5 Sensitive Species. All of these taxa also are the subjects of recent and ongoing phylogeographic studies, and they are of continuing interest to biologists studying the evolutionary processes that shape modern species of terrestrial vertebrates. Current information on their taxonomy, distribution, habits and problems is briefly reviewed and management recommendations are made.
  • New Species of Slender Salamander, Genus Batrachoseps, from the Southern Sierra Nevada of California

    New Species of Slender Salamander, Genus Batrachoseps, from the Southern Sierra Nevada of California

    Copeia, 2002(4), pp. 1016±1028 New Species of Slender Salamander, Genus Batrachoseps, from the Southern Sierra Nevada of California DAVID B. WAKE,KAY P. Y ANEV, AND ROBERT W. HANSEN Populations of robust salamanders belonging to the plethodontid salamander ge- nus Batrachoseps (subgenus Plethopsis) from the southern Sierra Nevada and adjacent regions represent a previously unknown species here described as Batrachoseps ro- bustus. The new species is robust, with a short trunk (17±18 trunk vertebrae) and well-developed limbs. It differs from its close geographic neighbor, Batrachoseps campi, in lacking patches of dorsal silvery iridophores and in having (typically) a lightly pigmented dorsal stripe, and from Batrachoseps wrighti in being more robust, having more trunk vertebrae, and in lacking conspicuous white spots ventrally. This species is widely distributed on the semiarid Kern Plateau of the southeastern Sierra Nevada and extends along the east slopes of the mountains into the lower Owens Valley; it also is found to the south in the isolated Scodie Mountains. It occurs at high elevations, from 1615±2800 m, in areas of low rainfall and high summer tem- peratures. HE slender salamanders, Batrachoseps, range ci®c. They occur in relatively extreme environ- T from the Columbia River in northern ments for terrestrial salamanders, in areas that Oregon (458339N) to the vicinity of El Rosario, are exceptionally hot and dry in the summer, Baja California Norte (308009N). These sala- and that have a short, unpredictable wet season manders were considered to display mainly in- with little rainfall. Some of them occur at high traspeci®c morphological variation, and for elevations that are under snow cover for several many years only two (Hendrickson, 1954) or months each year.
  • Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth (Euproserpinus Euterpe)

    Kern Primrose Sphinx Moth (Euproserpinus Euterpe)

    Kern primrose sphinx moth (Euproserpinus euterpe) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo: Paul Johnson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Field Office Sacramento, California September 2007 1 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Kern primrose sphinx moth (Euproserpinus euterpe) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General Information…………………………………………………………………………….1 I.A. Methodology used to complete the review……………………………………….…..1 I.B. Reviewers………………………………………………………………………….….1 I.C. Background………………………………………………………………...................1 II. Review Analysis………………………………………………………………………………..2 II.A. Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy………………..2 II.B. Recovery Criteria………………………………………………………………….…3 II.C. Updated Information and Current Species Status…………………………………....5 II.D. Synthesis………………………………………………………………………...….13 III. Results…………………………………………………………………………………...…...14 III.A. Recommended Classification…………………………………………………...…14 III.B. New Recovery Priority Number………………………………………………...…14 IV. Recommendations For Future Actions………………………………………………...….....14 V. References…………………………………………………………………………….……...16 2 5-YEAR REVIEW Kern primrose sphinx moth (Euproserpinus euterpe) I. GENERAL INFORMATION I.A. Methodology used to complete the review This review was conducted by staff in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California. The review is based on the following: information from species survey and monitoring reports, the Recovery Plan for the Kern primrose sphinx
  • Biology 2 Lab Packet for Practical 4

    Biology 2 Lab Packet for Practical 4

    1 Biology 2 Lab Packet For Practical 4 2 CLASSIFICATION: Domain: Eukarya Supergroup: Unikonta Clade: Opisthokonts Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata – Chordates Subphylum: Urochordata - Tunicates Class: Amphibia – Amphibians Subphylum: Cephalochordata - Lancelets Order: Urodela - Salamanders Subphylum: Vertebrata – Vertebrates Order: Apodans - Caecilians Superclass: Agnatha Order: Anurans – Frogs/Toads Order: Myxiniformes – Hagfish Class: Testudines – Turtles Order: Petromyzontiformes – Lamprey Class: Sphenodontia – Tuataras Superclass: Gnathostomata – Jawed Vertebrates Class: Squamata – Lizards/Snakes Class: Chondrichthyes - Cartilaginous Fish Lizards Subclass: Elasmobranchii – Sharks, Skates and Rays Order: Lamniiformes – Great White Sharks Family – Agamidae – Old World Lizards Order: Carcharhiniformes – Ground Sharks Family – Anguidae – Glass Lizards Order: Orectolobiniformes – Whale Sharks Family – Chameleonidae – Chameleons Order: Rajiiformes – Skates Family – Corytophanidae – Helmet Lizards Order: Myliobatiformes - Rays Family - Crotaphytidae – Collared Lizards Subclass: Holocephali – Ratfish Family – Helodermatidae – Gila monster Order: Chimaeriformes - Chimaeras Family – Iguanidae – Iguanids Class: Sarcopterygii – Lobe-finned fish Family – Phrynosomatidae – NA Spiny Lizards Subclass: Actinistia - Coelocanths Family – Polychrotidae – Anoles Subclass: Dipnoi – Lungfish Family – Geckonidae – Geckos Class: Actinopterygii – Ray-finned Fish Family – Scincidae – Skinks Order: Acipenseriformes – Sturgeon, Paddlefish Family – Anniellidae
  • Jockusch Et Al in 2012

    Jockusch Et Al in 2012

    Zootaxa 3190: 1–30 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Morphological and molecular diversification of slender salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Batrachoseps) in the southern Sierra Nevada of California with descriptions of two new species ELIZABETH L. JOCKUSCH1, IÑIGO MARTÍNEZ-SOLANO1,2, ROBERT W. HANSEN3, & DAVID B. WAKE4 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 75 N. Eagleville Rd., U-3043, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC) (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ronda de Toledo, s/n 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 316333 Deer Path Lane, Clovis, CA 93619-9735, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Slender salamanders of the genus Batrachoseps achieve relatively high diversity in the Kern Canyon region at the southern end of the Sierra Nevada of California through high turnover of species with small geographic ranges. The status of several populations of Batrachoseps in this region is enigmatic, and both morphological and molecular data have suggested that some populations do not belong to any of the currently recognized species. Identification of species in this region is com- plicated by the apparent extinction of Batrachoseps relictus in the vicinity of its type locality in the Lower Kern River Canyon. Here we analyze a comprehensive morphological dataset to evaluate diversity in the Kern River Canyon region.
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians

    Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians

    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
  • Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?

    Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?

    Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect.
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Persistent Plethodontid Themes: Species, Phylogenies, and Biogeography Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8dg7n8h6 Journal Herpetologica, 73(3) ISSN 0018-0831 Author Wake, DB Publication Date 2017-09-01 DOI 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-16-00065.1 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Persistent Plethodontid Themes: Species, Phylogenies, and Biogeography Author(s): David B. Wake Source: Herpetologica, 73(3):242-251. Published By: The Herpetologists' League https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-16-00065.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-16-00065.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Herpetologica, 73(3), 2017, 242–251 Ó 2017 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. Persistent Plethodontid Themes: Species, Phylogenies, and Biogeography 1 DAVID B.
  • O-11 Ken H. Osborne

    O-11 Ken H. Osborne

    Ken H. Osborne 6675 Avenue Juan Diaz, Riverside, CA, 92509 May 22, 2015 Mr. Dennis Campbell County of San Diego Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Avenue, Suite 110 San Diego, California 92123 Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan Amendment for Otay Ranch Village 13/Resort Village Impacts on the Federally Endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. Dear Mr. Campbell Endangered Habitats League has asked that I review the proposed Otay Ranch Village 13/Resort Village project in its various alternative forms as described in the March 2015 draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), in light of any potential impacts that it (they) may have on the resident population of federally endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Quino) on the project site. I am a known biologist with some depth of understanding in the biology, ecology, and conservation of this endangered species (Appendix). To this end, I will begin by providing my overall prognosis of implications for Quino with this project and evidence supporting my prognosis including detailed explanation of mechanisms of impact and illustration of example populations extirpated in the wake of similar developments. Although briefed in my introductory comments, a detailed description of Quino biology and ecology will be provided in the appendix as foundational material. After reviewing the DEIR, I have quickly and easily come to the conclusion that this project is not compatible with Quino conservation. Although I can’t go so far to say that this development would, by itself, cause the global extinction of Quino, it would certainly significantly contribute to that end. Even with Alternative G, it’s apparently minimal development footprint gives me concern.