DOCSLIB.ORG

12146353 02.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12146353 02.Pdf Capacity to be developed Implementation Schedule 3 (m /day) Short Term Medium Term Long Term No. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Project Status Project Name of Project of Name Total Initial Ratio WRMA Catchment WRMA 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 Develop. Siyoi Dam 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 Moi's Bridge Multipurpose Dam Water Resources 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Development for Urban Kiboro Multipurpose Dam Water Supply 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 Teremi 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 Transmission to Eldoret 9999 WSB, MTP, 1 Bondo, Siaya (2 UC) 24,136 12,000 50% F/S 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.1 Yala, Ugunja, Ukwala (3 2 WSB 8,141 2,442 30% UC) 1.8 1.8 1.8 4.3 4.3 4.3 3 Usenge WSB, F/S 7,004 4,000 57% 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 4 Moi'S Bridge WSB, MTP 6,934 6,934 100% 5.2 5.2 5.2 5 Item/Tambach WSB 24,246 5,000 21% 3.8 3.8 3.8 14.4 14.4 14.4 6 Port Victoria WSB 3,930 1,250 32% 0.9 0.9 0.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 7 Kapenguria MTP 18,714 5,614 30% 4.2 4.2 4.2 9.8 9.8 9.8 8 Eldoret - 83,354 25,006 30% 18.8 18.8 18.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 9 Vihiga - 71,042 21,313 30% 16.0 16.0 16.0 37.3 37.3 37.3 10 Kitale - 53,609 16,083 30% 12.1 12.1 12.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 11 Mumias - 43,215 12,964 30% 9.7 9.7 9.7 22.7 22.7 22.7 12 Webuye - 17,766 5,330 30% 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.3 9.3 9.3 13 Kakamega - 38,971 11,691 30% 8.8 8.8 8.8 20.5 20.5 20.5 14 Kapsabet - 48,197 14,459 30% LVN 10.8 10.8 10.8 25.3 25.3 25.3 15 Kimilili - 51,864 15,559 30% 11.7 11.7 11.7 27.2 27.2 27.2 16 Bungoma - 26,466 7,940 30% 6.0 6.0 6.0 13.9 13.9 13.9 17 Chwele - 7,382 2,215 30% 1.7 1.7 1.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 18 Busia - 23,738 7,121 30% 5.3 5.3 5.3 12.5 12.5 12.5 19 Luanda - 29,560 8,868 30% 6.7 6.7 6.7 15.5 15.5 15.5 20 Malaba - 10,665 3,200 30% 2.4 2.4 2.4 5.6 5.6 5.6 21 Malakisi - 10,233 3,070 30% 2.3 2.3 2.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 22 Butere - 7,656 2,297 30% 1.7 1.7 1.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 23 Kiminini - 7,179 2,154 30% 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 24 Nandi Hills - 6,062 6,062 100% 4.5 4.5 4.5 25 Lumakanda - 4,117 4,117 100% 3.1 3.1 3.1 26 Matunda - 4,480 4,480 100% 3.4 3.4 3.4 27 Nambale - 2,960 2,960 100% 2.2 2.2 2.2 28 Burnt Forest - 2,950 2,950 100% 2.2 2.2 2.2 29 Malava - 2,438 2,438 100% 1.8 1.8 1.8 Rehabilitation for 18 Urban Centres 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 Total Urban Water Supply Projects 647,010 219,516 34% 253.5 337.9 1,087.4 Rural Water Supply Projects 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 Note: As for “Project Status”, “WSB” means a project proposed by WSB, “MTP” means a flagship project proposed in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2019) of Kenya Vision 2030, and “F/S” means a project proposed in completed F/S. Source: JICA Study Team THE DEVELOPMENT OF Figure 15.2.1 THE NATIONAL WATER MASTER PLAN 2030 Implementation Schedule of Proposed Water Supply System Development Plan JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (1/6) EX - F - 32 Capacity to be developed Implementation Schedule 3 (m /day) Short Term Medium Term Long Term No. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Project Status Project Name of Project Name Total Initial Ratio WRMA Catchment WRMA 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 Develop. Nandi Forest Dam 5.05.05.05.0 Kisumu and Surrounding Kibos Dam 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 Area Koru Dam 46.6 46.6 46.6 46.6 1 Lake Victoria WSB, MTP, Kisumu 166,352 60,000 36% F/S* 45.0 45.0 45.0 79.8 79.8 79.8 Ahero, Awasi, Kipkelion, WSB, F/S* 124,289 37,287 30% Londiani, Muhoroni (6 UC) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Kisii and Surrounding Area Bunyunyu Dam 4.34.34.34.3 WSB, MTP, Kisii 29,501 24,000 81% F/S 2 18.0 18.0 18.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 Rongo, Suneka, Keroka, Awendo, Tabaka, Ogembo WSB, F/S 128,708 2,000 2% (6 Uc) 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 3 Kericho WSB, F/S 48,026 14,000 29% 10.5 10.5 10.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 4 Bomet WSB, F/S 49,706 8,000 16% 6.0 6.0 6.0 31.3 31.3 31.3 5 Homabay WSB, F/S* 20,475 2,000 10% 1.5 1.5 1.5 13.9 13.9 13.9 LVS 6 Nyamira, Oyugis (2 UC) WSB, D/D 41,076 36,000 88% 27.0 27.0 27.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 7 Mbita Point WSB, F/S 7,182 4,000 56% 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.4 8 Litein, Sotik (2 UC) WSB, F/S 8,000 8,000 100% 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 Migori WSB,D/D 15,752 4,726 30% 3.5 3.5 3.5 8.3 8.3 8.3 10 Kehancha - 17,716 5,315 30% 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.3 9.3 9.3 11 Kendu Bay - 8,114 2,434 30% 1.8 1.8 1.8 4.3 4.3 4.3 12 Nyansiongo - 2,777 833 30% 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 Rehabilitation for 22 Urban Centres 17.1 17.1 17.1 17.1 17.1 Total Urban Water Supply Projects 667,674 208,594 31% 542.2 517.2 836.0 Magwagwa Dam 0.10.10.10.1 Water Resources Development for Amala Dam 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Rural Water Supply Sande Dam 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 Ilooiterre Dam 0.80.80.80.8 Rural Water Supply Projects 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 Note: As for “Project Status”, “WSB” means a project proposed by WSB, “MTP” means a flagship project proposed in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2019) of Kenya Vision 2030, and “F/S” means a project proposed in completed F/S. Source: JICA Study Team THE DEVELOPMENT OF Figure 15.2.1 THE NATIONAL WATER MASTER PLAN 2030 Implementation Schedule of Proposed Water Supply System Development Plan JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (2/6) EX - F - 33 Capacity to be developed Implementation Schedule 3 (m /day) Short Term Medium Term Long Term No. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Project Status Project Name of Project Name Total Initial Ratio WRMA Catchment WRMA 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 Develop. Itare Dam 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 Londiani Dam Greater Nakuru Area 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Malewa Dam (for Naivasha) 1 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 Transmission from Itare Dam and Londiani Dam 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 Nakuru, Naivasha, Molo, Gilgil, Njoro, Eldama Ravine WSB, F/S 192,374 100,000 52% (6UC) 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 2 KabarnetWSB, F/S 1,221 1,221 100% 0.9 0.9 0.9 3 Ol Kalou WSB, MTP 34,858 10,000 29% 7.5 7.5 7.5 18.6 18.6 18.6 Upper Narok Dam 4Narok WSB, MTP 21,274 4,600 22% 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 5 Lodwar MTP 4,018 1,205 30% 0.9 0.9 0.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 RV 6 Mai Mahiu - 6,984 2,095 30% 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 7 Kakuma - 5,408 1,622 30% 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.8 2.8 2.8 8 Lokichogio - 2,595 779 30% 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 Rehabilitation for 11 Urban Centres 17.7 17.7 17.7 17.7 17.7 Total Urban Water Supply Projects 268,732 121,522 45% 322.6 435.6 420.8 Arror Dam 6.36.36.36.3 Oletukat Dam 5.95.95.95.9 Leshota Dam Water Resources Development for 4.84.84.84.8 Oldorko Dam Rural Water Supply 0.70.70.70.7 Kimwarer Dam 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 Embobut Dam 4.24.24.24.2 Waseges Dam #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! Rural Water Supply Projects in RVCA 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Note: As for “Project Status”, “WSB” means a project proposed by WSB, “MTP” means a flagship project proposed in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2019) of Kenya Vision 2030, and “F/S” means a project proposed in completed F/S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Turkana Archaeology: the Holocene
    Lake Turkana Archaeology: The Holocene Lawrence H. Robbins, Michigan State University Abstract. Pioneering research in the Holocene archaeology of Lake Turkana con- tributed significantly to the development of broader issues in the prehistory of Africa, including the aquatic civilization model and the initial spread of domes- ticated livestock in East Africa. These topics are reviewed following retrospective discussion of the nature of pioneering fieldwork carried out in the area in the1960s. The early research at Lake Turkana uncovered the oldest pottery in East Africa as well as large numbers of bone harpoons similar to those found along the Nile Valley and elsewhere in Africa. The Lake Turkana area remains one of the major building blocks in the interpretation of the later prehistory of Africa as a whole, just as it is a key area for understanding the early phases of human evolution. Our way had at first led us up hills of volcanic origin. I can’t imagine landscape more barren, dried out and grim. At 1.22 pm the Bassonarok appeared, an enormous lake of blue water dotted with some islands. The northern shores cannot be seen. At its southern end it must be about 20 kilometers wide. As far as the eye can see are barren and volcanic shores. I give it the name of Lake Rudolf. (Teleki 1965 [1886–95]: 5 March 1888) From yesterday’s campsite we could overlook nearly the whole western and north- ern shores of the lake. The soil here is different again. I observed a lot of conglom- erates and fossils (petrification).
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Land Tenure Profiles In
    Kenya's Water Towers Protection and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (WaTER) Programme LAND TENURE PROFILES IN ‘HOTSPOTS’ AND VULNERABLE AREAS ON PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY LANDS IN MT. ELGON AND CHERANGANY HILLS ECOSYSTEMS Component 4: Science to Inform Design of Community-Level Actionsand Policy Decisions Project Report August 2017 This programme is funded Kenya Forestry Research Institute By the European Union (KEFRI) Disclaimer “This document has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), and can under no circumstance be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union” i Cover Photo: Paddocks for livestock grazing in seasonal wetland near Cheptongei area. (Photo by Griphin Ochieng) ii Consulting Services for client Kenya Forestry Research Institute P.O Box 20412-00200 Nairobi Final Report Compiled by: Environment Management Consultants Shelter Afrique Centre, 3rd floor Wing 3A Longonot Road, Upperhill P.O.Box, 9648-00100, NAIROBI Landline: +254-020-520-6162 Cell: +254-722-579272 [email protected] iii TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF TABLE .................................................................................................................................... VIII LIST OF PLATES ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Experience to Theory
    Ingrid Duchhart 2007 Process of Reflective Learning from Case-study Projects in Kenya A Theory Designing Sustainable Landscapes: From Experience to Designing Sustainable Landscapes From Experience to Theory A Process of Reflective Learning from Case-study Projects in Kenya Designing Sustainable Landscapes: From Experience to Theory A process of reflective learning from case-study projects in Kenya Ingrid Duchhart Wageningen University, The Netherlands, 2007 Ingrid Duchhart Designing Sustainable Landscapes: From Experience to Theory A Process of Reflective Learning from Case-study Projects in Kenya Promotor: Prof. ir. K. Kerkstra Hoogleraar Landschapsarchitectuur, Wageningen Universiteit Co-Promotor: Prof. F.R. Steiner PhD, University of Texas, USA Dean School of Architecture, Henry M. Rockwell Chair in Architecture Promotie Commissie: Prof. dr. A.J. Dietz, Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. dr. ir. L. Stroosnijder, Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. A.J.J. van der Valk, Wageningen Universiteit Ir. D. Sijmons, H+N+S Landschapsarchitecten Utrecht Designing Sustainable Landscapes: From Experience to Theory A Process of Reflective Learning from Case-study Projects in Kenya Ingrid Duchhart Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 18 juni 2007 des namiddags te 13.30 in de Aula. Duchhart, I. Designing Sustainable Landscapes: From Experience to Theory A Process of Reflective Learning from Case-study Projects in
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Technical Summary DRAFT
    REPORT Non-Technical Summary DRAFT Submitted to: Submitted by: Golder Associates (UK) Ltd Cavendish House, Bourne End Business Park, Cores End Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5AS, UK +44 0 1628 851851 1433956.637.A1 June 2020 June 2020 1433956.637.A1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 2 3.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 2 4.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 3 5.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 6.0 BASELINE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Geology, Geohazards and Seismicity ............................................................................................... 6 6.2 Soils ................................................................................................................................................... 6 6.3 Weather and Climate .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resource Conflict in Kenya: the Case of Turkwel Dam and Pokot-Turkana Relations, 1984-2015
    Faculty of Arts, Department of History MA Project Water Resource Conflict in Kenya: The Case of Turkwel Dam and Pokot-Turkana Relations, 1984-2015 By Andreas Nandelenga Submitted in partial fulfilment of Master of Arts in Armed Conflict and Peace Studies University of Nairobi 2019 DECLARATION This is my original work and has not been submitted for an award of a degree either in any University or any other institution. Signed _____________________________ Date ________________________ Andreas Nandelenga C50/78008/2015 This project has been submitted for an examination with our approval as University supervisors. Dr. KENNETH S. OMBONGI Signature:…………………….. Date:…………………………. Dr. MARGARET GACHIHI Signature:…………………….. Date:…………………………. ii DEDICATION To my beloved mother Julia Mukoya Nandelenga, late father Timothy Nandelenga and late brother Joseph Nandelenga. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my thanks, first and foremost, to the almighty God for walking me through this work. Secondly, I would like to thank the University of Nairobi, through the Department of History and Archaeology for granting me an opportunity to take my studies. Special thanks to my two supervisors Dr. Kenneth S. Ombongi and Dr. Margaret Gachihi without whom this project could not have been completed. They constantly mentored; panel beat, corrected and encouraged me through this academic process. I cannot forget to thank all the academic staff members of the Department of History who made my studies possible. I wish to particularly thank Dr. George Gona, Dr. Ben Nyanchoga, Dr. Misigo, Prof Vincent Simiyu and other members of academic and non-academic staff for their kind assistance. My gratitude to Dr. Solomon Owoche, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized THE GOVERNMENT OF KENYA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES KENYA WATER SECURITY AND CLIMATE RESILIENCE PROGRAM (KWSCRP) Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL VULNERABLE AND MARGINALISED GROUPS FRAMEWORK (VMGF) Public Disclosure Authorized (P117635) April 7th 2015 Prepared by: Tito Kodiaga and Lazarus Kubasu Nolasco Senior Environmental Specialist and Senior Social Specialist Project Management Unit Kenya Water Security and Climate Resilience Project (KWSCRP) Public Disclosure Authorized Nairobi, Kenya. Page | 1 KWSCRP Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS APL Adaptable Program Loan ASAL Arid and Semi-Arid Lands AWSB Athi Water Services Board CDA Coast Development Authority CDD Community Driven Development CoK Constitution of Kenya CPS Country Partnership Strategy CAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program CSO Civil society organizations CWSB Coast Water Services Board DSS Decision Support System EAs Environmental Assessments EA Executing Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMCA Environmental Management and Coordination Act EMP Environmental Management Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FPIC Free, prior and informed consultation FS Feasibility Study GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographic Information System GIZ German Agency for International GOK Government of Kenya GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism GRC Grievance Redress
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Page | ELRP-Integrated Pest Management Plan – IPMP-Component 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 6 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 20 1.1 Emergency Locust Response Program ............................................................... 20 1.2 Project Development Objective ......................................................................... 20 1.3 ELRP Project Components ................................................................................ 20 1.4 Selected Pesticides ............................................................................................. 21 1.5 Project Activities ................................................................................................ 22 1.6 Project Beneficiaries .......................................................................................... 23 1.7 Aims and Objectives of IPMP ............................................................................ 23 1.8 Component 1 Implementation Arrangements .................................................... 24 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ..................................................................... 25 2.1 Stakeholder Identification .................................................................................. 25 2.2 Stakeholder
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or Country -- Eastern Hemisphere -- Africa
    G8202 AFRICA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G8202 .C5 Chad, Lake .N5 Nile River .N9 Nyasa, Lake .R8 Ruzizi River .S2 Sahara .S9 Sudan [Region] .T3 Tanganyika, Lake .T5 Tibesti Mountains .Z3 Zambezi River 2717 G8222 NORTH AFRICA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, G8222 ETC. .A8 Atlas Mountains 2718 G8232 MOROCCO. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G8232 .A5 Anti-Atlas Mountains .B3 Beni Amir .B4 Beni Mhammed .C5 Chaouia region .C6 Coasts .D7 Dra region .F48 Fezouata .G4 Gharb Plain .H5 High Atlas Mountains .I3 Ifni .K4 Kert Wadi .K82 Ktaoua .M5 Middle Atlas Mountains .M6 Mogador Bay .R5 Rif Mountains .S2 Sais Plain .S38 Sebou River .S4 Sehoul Forest .S59 Sidi Yahia az Za region .T2 Tafilalt .T27 Tangier, Bay of .T3 Tangier Peninsula .T47 Ternata .T6 Toubkal Mountain 2719 G8233 MOROCCO. PROVINCES G8233 .A2 Agadir .A3 Al-Homina .A4 Al-Jadida .B3 Beni-Mellal .F4 Fès .K6 Khouribga .K8 Ksar-es-Souk .M2 Marrakech .M4 Meknès .N2 Nador .O8 Ouarzazate .O9 Oujda .R2 Rabat .S2 Safi .S5 Settat .T2 Tangier Including the International Zone .T25 Tarfaya .T4 Taza .T5 Tetuan 2720 G8234 MOROCCO. CITIES AND TOWNS, ETC. G8234 .A2 Agadir .A3 Alcazarquivir .A5 Amizmiz .A7 Arzila .A75 Asilah .A8 Azemmour .A9 Azrou .B2 Ben Ahmet .B35 Ben Slimane .B37 Beni Mellal .B4 Berkane .B52 Berrechid .B6 Boujad .C3 Casablanca .C4 Ceuta .C5 Checkaouene [Tétouan] .D4 Demnate .E7 Erfond .E8 Essaouira .F3 Fedhala .F4 Fès .F5 Figurg .G8 Guercif .H3 Hajeb [Meknès] .H6 Hoceima .I3 Ifrane [Meknès] .J3 Jadida .K3 Kasba-Tadla .K37 Kelaa des Srarhna .K4 Kenitra .K43 Khenitra .K5 Khmissat .K6 Khouribga .L3 Larache .M2 Marrakech .M3 Mazagan .M38 Medina .M4 Meknès .M5 Melilla .M55 Midar .M7 Mogador .M75 Mohammedia .N3 Nador [Nador] .O7 Oued Zem .O9 Oujda .P4 Petitjean .P6 Port-Lyantey 2721 G8234 MOROCCO.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COUNTY BOUNDARIES BILL, 2021 ARRANGEMENT of CLAUSES Clause PART I - PRELIMINARY 1—Short Title
    SPECIAL ISSUE Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 42 (Senate Bills No. 20) REPUBLIC OF KENYA –––––––" KENYA GAZETTE SUPPLEMENT SENATE BILLS, 2021 NAIROBI, 23rd March, 2021 CONTENT Bill for Introduction into the Senate— PAGE The"County"Boundaries"Bill,"2021 ................................................................ 309 PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, NAIROBI 309 THE COUNTY BOUNDARIES BILL, 2021 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES Clause PART I - PRELIMINARY 1—Short title. 2—Interpretation. PART II – COUNTY BOUNDARIES 3—County boundaries. 4—Cabinet secretary to keep electronic records. 5—Resolution of disputes through mediation. 6—Alteration of county boundaries. PART III – RESOLUTION OF COUNTY BOUNDARY DISPUTES 7—Establishment of a county boundaries mediation committee. 8—Nomination of members to the committee. 9—Composition of the committee. 10—Removal of a member of the mediation committee. 11—Remuneration and allowances. 12—Secretariat. 13—Role of a mediation committee. 14—Powers of the committee. 15—Report by the Committee. 16—Extension of timelines. 17—Dissolution of a mediation committee. PART IV – ALTERATION OF COUNTY BOUNDARIES 18—Petition for alteration of the boundary of a county. 19—Submission of a petition. ! 1! 310310 The County Boundaries Bill, 2021 20—Consideration of petition by special committee. 21—Report of special committee. 22—Consideration of report of special committee by the Senate. 23—Consideration of report of special committee by the National Assembly. PART V – INDEPENDENT COUNTY BOUNDARIES COMMISSION 24—Establishment of a commission. 25—Membership of the commission. 26—Qualifications. 27—Functions of the commission. 28—Powers of the commission. 29—Conduct of business and affairs of the commission. 30—Independence of the commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Mapping & Context Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA TURKANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT FINAL REPORT NATURAL RESOURCE MAPPING AND CONTEXT ANALYSIS JUNE 2015 Natural Resource Mapping – Turkana County – April – May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 8 Preface .................................................................................................................... 10 Forward ................................................................................................................... 11 Acknowledgement .................................................................................................... 12 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Rationale for Natural Resource Mapping in Turkana County ................... 19 Chapter 3: The Natural Resource Mapping Process .................................................. 24 Chapter 4: Water Resources ..................................................................................... 26 Chapter 4: Water Resources ..................................................................................... 26 4.0 Water Resources Availability and Potential ...................................................... 26 4.1 Groundwater Resources .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Threats of Irrigation Development in Kenya's Drylands
    Opportunities and Threats of Irrigation Development in Kenya’s Drylands OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS OF IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA’S DRYLANDS Volume VI: Turkana County 201 3 Funded by Implemented by European Union Volume VI: Turkana County Final Report 2013 i Opportunities and Threats of Irrigation Development in Kenya’s Drylands DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or European Union (EU) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or EU in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or EU. Volume VI: Turkana County Final Report 2013 ii Opportunities and Threats of Irrigation Development in Kenya’s Drylands ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work done by Ocra Company Ltd. in carrying out the study and compiling this report was possible through the efforts of many people whose dedication ensured the success of the study. Firstly, the study was made possible through the generous funding by the European Union, through the FAO Kenya Office. Secondly, Ocra Company Ltd. extends gratitude to FAO Kenya Office for the consultancy contract to conduct this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment of the East African Rift Valley Lakes
    Aquat. Sci. 65 (2003) 254–271 1015-1621/03/030254-18 DOI 10.1007/s00027-003-0638-9 Aquatic Sciences © EAWAG, Dübendorf, 2003 Overview Article Environmental assessment of the East African Rift Valley lakes Eric O. Odada 1, *, Daniel O. Olago 1,Fred Bugenyi 2, Kassim Kulindwa 3,Jerome Karimumuryango 4, Kelly West 5, Micheni Ntiba 6, Shem Wandiga 7,Peninah Aloo-Obudho 8 and Pius Achola 9 1 Department of Geology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, Kenya 2 Department of Zoology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda 3 Economics Research Bureau, University of Dar-es-Salaam, P.O. Box 35096, Dar-es-Salaam 4 Director General de L’NECN, Institute National pour L’Environment et la Conservation de la Nature, BP 56, Gitega, Burundi 5 IUCN Eastern Africa Regional Office, P.O. Box 68200, Nairobi, Kenya 6 Department of Zoology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, Kenya 7 Kenya National Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 39450, Nairobi, Kenya 8 Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya 9 Kenya Red Cross Society, P.O. Box 40712, Nairobi, Kenya Received: 1 October 2002; revised manuscript accepted: 12 June 2003 Abstract. An assessment of the East African Rift Valley ities. Pollution is from uncontrolled discharge of wastes lakes was initiated by the United Nations Environment directly into the lakes. Unsustainable exploitation of fish- Programme (UNEP) with funding from Global Environ- eries and other living resources is caused by over-fishing, ment Facility as part of the Global International Waters destructive fishing practices, and introduction of non-na- Assessment (GIWA).
    [Show full text]