DOCSLIB.ORG

Melbourne Water Expenditure Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Melbourne Water Expenditure Review + Melbourne Water Expenditure Review Essential Services Commission FINAL REPORT 25 February 2016 Contents Glossary ..................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of work ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Confidentiality .................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Structure of report ............................................................................................................ 1 2 Overview of approach ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Process for review ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Approach for assessing forecasts ....................................................................................... 4 3 Summary of Melbourne Water’s forecasts ...................................................................... 7 3.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Operating expenditure ...................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Capital expenditure ........................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Key drivers and obligations ............................................................................................. 10 3.5 Consultation ................................................................................................................... 11 3.6 Service standards ............................................................................................................ 13 3.7 Demand forecasts ........................................................................................................... 13 4 Assessment of operating expenditure ........................................................................... 15 4.1 Historical and forecast operating expenditure ................................................................. 15 4.2 BAU operating expenditure ............................................................................................. 17 4.3 Assessment by Service .................................................................................................... 27 4.4 Assessment by expenditure type ..................................................................................... 37 4.5 Summary of recommended changes to operating expenditure ........................................ 59 5 Capital expenditure ....................................................................................................... 62 5.1 Historical and forecast capital expenditure ...................................................................... 62 5.2 Generic issues ................................................................................................................. 64 5.3 Major sewer projects ...................................................................................................... 66 5.4 Major water projects ...................................................................................................... 75 5.5 Major waterways and drainage projects .......................................................................... 85 5.6 Major Programs Review .................................................................................................. 93 5.7 Summary of our recommendations ................................................................................. 98 Limitation of our work ............................................................................................................. 104 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/au/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms. © 2016 Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd Glossary AER Australian Energy Regulator ASP Activated Sludge Plant BAU Business as usual BNI Business Needs Identifier Business Case CAPEX Capital expenditure DAE Deloitte Access Economics DBTS Digital Business Transformation Strategy EPA Environment Protection Authority Victoria ESC Essential Services Commission ETP Eastern Treatment Plant FIT Feed-in Tariff FWB Fairer Water Bills MCA Multi-criteria analysis MW Melbourne Water NPC Net Present Cost NPV Net Present Value OPEX Operating expenditure PPA Power purchase agreement RANE Risk Adjusted Nominal Estimate REC Renewable Energy Certificate RET Renewable Energy Target TN Total Nitrogen VDP Victorian Desalination Plant WAS Waste Activated Sludge WIRO Water Industry Regulatory Order 2014 WTP Western Treatment Plant Deloitte Access Economics i Executive Summary Background The Essential Services Commission (ESC) is currently conducting a review of Melbourne Water’s proposed services and prices to be charged for the regulatory period 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2021, referred to in this document as the next or fourth regulatory period. Melbourne Water submitted its 2016 Price Submission to the ESC for the fourth regulatory period in October 2015. The price submission includes forecasts of operating expenditure (opex), capital expenditure (capex) and demand, proposed service standards and prices. The ESC will review the price submission and intends to release a draft decision in March 2016, with a final decision in June 2016. Deloitte Access Economics (DAE) and Arup have been engaged by the ESC to review Melbourne Water’s expenditure forecasts. Arup is largely responsible for assessing Melbourne Water’s forecast capex, and DAE is assessing the forecast opex for the period. The ESC has requested that in our review of the capex forecasts we focus on the major projects that comprise a significant proportion of the total capex forecasts and provide advice on whether the expenditure meets certain criteria. For opex, we have been asked to provide advice on whether: Changes in operating costs are consistent with the timing of major capital projects Businesses are fulfilling their obligations and meeting customer service expectations as cost efficiently as possible, and Forecast divergences can be readily explained. The ESC asked that cost allocation, energy, IT and chemical costs be a focus of our review. Process for review We took the following approach to undertaking this review: We reviewed the Price Submission and supporting documentation provided by Melbourne Water to the ESC; We consulted with the metropolitan retailers and Southern Rural Water for their views on Melbourne Water’s Price Submission; We submitted a request for further information and prepared a number of questions for Melbourne Water; We visited Melbourne Water on 26 November 2015 to discuss the Price Submission and our questions; We visited the Western Treatment Plant on Monday 30 November 2015 for a tour of the sites where significant capex is proposed; We prepared a Draft Report which was provided to the ESC and Melbourne Water on 22 December 2015; Deloitte Access Economics ii We held discussions with Melbourne Water regarding the Draft Report and reviewed an initial written response from Melbourne Water to the draft report; and We reviewed responses provided by Melbourne Water following further questions relating to opex and capex. Approach to review In assessing Melbourne Water’s forecast operating and capex for the fourth regulatory period, we have had regard to the requirements of the Water Industry Act (1994) and the Water Industry Regulatory Order (WIRO), as well as the ESC’s Guidance Paper for Melbourne Water’s regulatory review, issued in April 2015. While there are a number of factors listed in the WIRO and Guidance Paper to which we have had regard, our overarching consideration is that the forecasts must be ‘expenditure which would be incurred by a prudent service provider acting efficiently to achieve the lowest cost of delivering on service outcomes over the regulatory period, taking into account a long-term planning horizon.’1 Our review has considered both the need and efficiency of the proposed expenditure. Melbourne Water has made significant cost reductions over the current regulatory period and is to be commended for doing so. Business and procurement processes have been redesigned, staff numbers stabilised (after adjusting for the in-housing of waterways staff) and there has been a clear focus on cost containment. Recommendations - operating expenditure However, through our analysis of Melbourne Water’s proposed opex we have identified the following areas of concerns with the forward forecasts and recommended the following
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Melbourne Water Corporation 1998/1999 Annual Report
    MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 1 M ELBOURNE WATER C ORPORATION 1998/1999 A NNUAL R EPORT MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 2 C ONTENTS 2 Chairman’s Report 4 Managing Director’s Overview 6 Business Performance Overview 10 Maximise Shareholder Value 18 Achieve Excellent Customer Service 22 Be a Leader in Environmental Management 28 Fulfil Our Community Obligations 34 Corporate Governance 38 Five Year Financial Summary 39 Financial Statements 33 Statement of Corporate Intent The birds illustrated on the front cover are the Great-billed Heron and the White Egret. MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 1 M ELBOURNE WATER C ORPORATION 1998/1999 A NNUAL R EPORT Melbourne Water is a statutory corporation wholly owned by the Government of Victoria. The responsible Minister is the Hon. Patrick McNamara, Minister for Agriculture and Resources. VISION To be a leader in urban water cycle management P URPOSE Melbourne Water exists to add value for its customers and the community by operating a successful commercial business which supplies safe water, treats sewage and removes stormwater at an acceptable cost and in an environmentally sensitive manner. VALUES Melbourne Water’s values determine its behaviour as an organisation. The values are innovation, cooperation, respect, enthusiasm, integrity and pride. They are a guide to employees on how they should conduct their activities. Through embracing and abiding by the values, employees demonstrate to others the principles by which Melbourne Water conducts its business. 1 MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 2 C HAIRMAN’S REPORT During the year Melbourne Water produced a solid financial result and completed several major projects for the long-term benefit of our customers and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Microbial Pollution in Surface Waters and the Coastal Ocean Through a Program of Review, Field Experimentation and Numerical Modelling
    Dynamics of microbial pollution in aquatic systems Matthew Richard Hipsey B.Sc (Hons) (Environmental Science) M.Eng.Sc (Environmental Engineering) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Adelaide School of Earth and Environmental Sciences May 2007 Microbial pollution in aquatic systems M.R. Hipsey Pg iii Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................................xi Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. xiii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................... xvii Preface .................................................................................................................................................. xix Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 An Emerging Threat .............................................................................................................................3 Surrogates for Indicating Pathogen Threats.........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents
    Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................3 3.5 Healthy Ecosystems ...........................................24 1. Objectives of the Plan ..........................................4 3.5.1 Native Flora and Fauna ............................24 2. Context .......................................................................4 3.5.2 Foreshore Vegetation Management .........25 3.5.3 Pest and Nuisance Plants ........................26 2.1 Lake Eildon Development ....................................4 3.5.4 Pest Animals .............................................27 2.2 Lake Eildon as a Water Supply ............................4 3.5.5 References ...............................................27 2.3 Storage Operations ..............................................5 2.4 Land Status ...........................................................5 3.6 Land Management ..............................................28 2.5 Legal Status ..........................................................5 3.6.1 Permits, Licences and Lease Arrangements ................................28 2.6 Study Area .............................................................5 3.6.2 Fire ............................................................29 3. A Plan for the Management 3.6.3 Foreshore Erosion ....................................30 of Lake Eildon ..........................................................5 3.6.4 Stream Bank Erosion ................................31 3.1 Plan
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Value of Water in Storage
    Melbourne School of Engineering Department of Infrastructure Engineering The economic value of water in storage 11th February 2018 Citation Western, Andrew W., Taylor, Nathan, Langford, John K., and Azmi, Mo, 2017. The economic value of water in storage. The University of Melbourne, Australia. Copyright © The University of Melbourne, 2017. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of The University of Melbourne. Contact Professor Andrew Western, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010, Australia [email protected] Project Team The University of Melbourne Project team consisted of: • Professor Andrew Western, Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne; • Professor John Langford, Steering Committee Chair, University of Melbourne; and • Research Fellow, Nathan Taylor, University of Melbourne. Steering Committee The project was informed by the members of the Steering Committee consisting of: • Richard Smith; Business Planning and Regulation Manager; City West Water; • Udaya Kularathna; Team Leader Water Resource Assessment, Integrated Planning; Melbourne Water; • Bruce Rhodes, Manager Water Resources Management, Melbourne Water; • Ian Johnson; Manager Urban Water Policy; South East Water; • Dominic Keary; ESC Project Manager; Yarra Valley Water; and • Stephen, Sonnenberg, Manager Urban Water Security Policy, Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning. The Steering Committee was Chaired by Professor John Langford, University of Melbourne. While this report was informed by the Steering Committee, the findings contained in the report are the responsibility of the Project Team and not the Steering Committee or the organisations they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Murrindindi Map (PDF, 3.1
    o! E o! E E E E E E E E E E # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Mt Camel # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Swanpool # # Rushworth TATONG E Forest RA Euroa # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # +$ TATONG - TATO-3 - MT TATONG - REDCASTLE - # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # MITCHELL RD (CFA) TATONG WATCHBOX CHERRY TREE TK # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # CREEK +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # LONGWOOD - # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # REDCASTLE WITHERS ST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # - PAVEYS RD Lake Nagambie # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # CORNER (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # LONGWOOD Joint Fuel # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Nagambie +$ - WITHERS # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # E STREET (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # E LONGWOOD - MAXFIELD ST +$ SAMARIA PRIVATE PROPERTY (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # - MT JOY +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # +$ +$+$ LONGWOOD - REILLY LA - +$+$ +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # +$ +$ PRIVATE PROPERTY (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # REDCASTLE - +$+$ OLD COACH RD LONGWOOD +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Management LONGWOOD # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Graytown d - PUDDY R - PRIMARY # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # n LANE (CFA) i # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # a SCHOOL (CFA) M # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # e i # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    [Show full text]
  • North Central Area Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL NORTH CENTRAL AREA FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS February 1981 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s North Central Area Review Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 4 May 1982, 22 June 1982, 24 August 1982 and 26 June 1984, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origin of changes. 2 MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL S. G. McL. Dimmick, B.A., B. Com., Dip. Soc. Stud.; (Chairman) A. Mitchell, M. Agr. Sc., D.D.A.; Chairman, Soil Conservation Authority; (Deputy Chairman) C. N. Austin B. W. Court, B.Sc., B.E.; Secretary for Minerals and Energy W. N. Holsworth, Ph.D., M.Sc., B.Sc. J. Lindros, Ph.C. C. E. Middleton, L.S., F.I.S.Aust.; Secretary for Lands J. S. Rogerson, B.C.E., E.W.S., F.I.E.Aust.; Deputy Chairman, State Rivers and Water Supply Commission D. S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director of National Parks D. F. Smith, B.Agr.Sc., M.Agr.Sc., Ph.D., Dip.Ed., M.Ed.Admin; Director General of Agriculture A. J. Threader, B.Sc.F., Dip.For.(Cres.), M.I.F.A.; Chairman, Forests Commission, Victoria J. C. F. Wharton, B.Sc.; Director of Fisheries and Wildlife 3 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 4 A. PARKS 8 B. REFERENCE AREAS 20 C. WILDLIFE RESERVES 22 D. WATER PRODUCTION 25 E. HARDWOOD PRODUCTION 32 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Context and Site Description
    LOCAL CONTEXT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Metropolitan and Regional Context The Greenvale Central Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) area is located approximately 20 kilometres north of the Melbourne CBD, within the Hume Growth Area shown on Plan 1. Melbourne‟s Hume Growth Area generally extends north from Somerton Road (west of Sydney-Melbourne rail line) to Gunns Gully Road at Merrifield. It includes parts of the suburbs of Greenvale and Craigieburn and the localities of Donnybrook, Kalkallo and Beveridge. The Hume Growth Area, along with the Mitchell and Whittlesea Growth Areas, make up the Melbourne North Growth Corridor. The Melbourne North Growth Corridor Plan details the strategic direction for future urban development within this region. The corridor is characterised by strong population growth occurring on various fronts. The population base is projected to increase from its current level of around 170,000 residents to over 220,000 people and has the capacity to provide for at least 68,000 jobs. The North Growth Corridor Plan provides an opportunity to establish new communities to assist in meeting Melbourne‟s urban growth needs over the next 30 years. The plan ensures that the following existing key roles and features are maintained within the Hume Growth Area: A strategic transport corridor of state and national significance; A gateway to Melbourne for interstate and international visitors; Large areas for future employment and industrial development; Highly self-contained working population (with approximately 50% of Hume‟s workforce employed within the municipality); Significant water catchments, creek corridors, remnant vegetation and stone resources on its east and west boundaries; and Important landscape features and biodiversity assets including grasslands and grassy woodlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
    Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer 2 Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Introduction During the Millennium Pipeline to provide water security The key questions asked in the Drought, Victoria made to towns and communities in both preliminary business case were: large investments in the directions. The work has shown that it is technically feasible to • What infrastructure is required state’s water security. The pump water north with additional for bi-directional pumping and Victorian Desalination works to existing infrastructure. It is it technically feasible? Project was commissioned, would require additional capital • How much water can be investment and it is an option that $1 billion dollars was pumped from the Melbourne government will continue to invested in upgrading the system to the Goulburn River? explore. Goulburn-Murray Irrigation • When can water be transferred District, and the water grid The primary benefits available by and where can it be used? was expanded, including sending water north through the building the Sugarloaf Sugarloaf Pipeline include: • Is the infrastructure financially viable? Pipeline. • supplying water to irrigators and private diverters to improve This document summarises the As a consequence of these agricultural productivity; key findings of the preliminary investments, the Victorian business case. Government has determined that • improving water security for up to an additional 75 gigalitres rural towns and urban centres (GL) per year be available for use connected to the water grid; in northern Victoria. This will support industry and farmers, • making water available to be particularly during dry conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • VRFG 2007-08 ADS.Indd
    Rock lobster Spiny freshwater crayfish: The body of a RESPONSIBLE FISHING • if the fish is hooked deeper in the mouth or in 28 Rock lobster is measured from the front edge of the crayfish which is not cut in any way other than BEHAVIOURS the stomach through having swallowed the bait, 29 groove between the large antennae to the nearest to remove one or more legs or claws, or is not do not try to pull or twist the hook out. Leave the part of the rear edge of the carapace (main body mutilated in any way other than the absence of Handling Fish hook where it is and cut the line near the hook. shell). Divers are required to measure rock lobster one or more legs or claws. Treating fish humanely, maintaining table fish underwater prior to bringing them to the surface. quality and avoiding waste means: Reducing Damage to Fish DEFINITIONS If the fish that is to be released must be handled • using only tackle that is appropriate for the out of water, reduce damage to the fish by: Catch limit: A general term used to describe any size and type of fish; limit on catching or possession of fish. Bag limits, • using a net without knotted mesh; • attending gear to ensure that fish are boat limits, vehicle limits and possession limits • retrieving fish as quickly as possible; are all types of catch limits. retrieved as soon as they are caught; • using wet hands or a wet cloth, and a Bag limit: The maximum number of a particular • dispatching fish immediately, and; minimum of handling to ensure that released type of fish that a person may take on any one day.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Annual Report
    Water Quality Annual Report 2016-17 Melbourne Water Doc ID. 39900111 Melbourne Water is owned by the Victorian Government. We manage Melbourne’s water supply catchments, remove and treat most of Melbourne’s sewage, and manage rivers and creeks and major drainage systems throughout the Port Phillip and Westernport region. Table of contents Water supply system .................................................................................................. 3 Source water .............................................................................................................. 4 Improvement initiatives ............................................................................................. 7 Drinking water treatment processes .......................................................................... 8 Issues ...................................................................................................................... 16 Emergency, incident and event management ........................................................... 16 Risk management plan audit results ........................................................................ 17 Exemptions under Section 8 of the Act ..................................................................... 17 Undertakings under Section 30 of the Act ................................................................ 17 Further information .................................................................................................. 17 2 Water Quality Annual Report | 2016-17 This report is
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water
    Integrating 3D Hydrodynamic Modelling into DSS in a Large Drinking Water Utility Dr Kathy Cinque and Dr Peter Yeates Presentation Overview • Melbourne Water • System • Water quality and risk management • Modelling capabilities • Decision Support System (DSS) • Components • Case Studies • Recent modelling project • Future direction Melbourne Water Supply drinking and recycled water and manage Melbourne's water supply catchments, sewage treatment and rivers, estuaries and wetlands Drinking water • 4.1 million customers • 10 storage reservoirs • Biggest reservoir = 1,068 GL (280,000 million gallons) • Smallest reservoir = 3 GL (790 million gallons) • Protected water supply catchments • Total area = 1,600 km2 (400,000 acres) • 80% of water supplied is unfiltered but disinfected Location of Melbourne, Australia Melbourne Melbourne Water supply system Risk management Unfiltered supply means our reservoirs are an important barrier to contamination Detailed understanding of hydrodynamics and water quality is paramount to ensuring safe drinking water • Fate and transport of pollutants • Risk of algal blooms • Event management • Impact of changes in operation • Strategic planning Decision Support System (DSS) framework • Provides a single point of access 3D Hydrodynamic Model Hydrodynamics - ELCOM • Uses an orthogonal grid • Simulates temporal behaviour of water bodies with environmental forcing • Models velocities, temperatures, salinities and densities Biogeochemistry - CAEDYM • Represents the major biogeochemical processes influencing water quality, including sediment Hydrodynamic modelling at Melbourne Water • Drinking water reservoirs for over 10 years • Significant investment • 10 LDS’s in 7 reservoirs • Development of integrated modelling platform (ARMS) • Dedicated in-house modeller • Real-time and scenario analysis • Wastewater treatment plant mixing zone studies • Estuary research – seagrass, mangroves, toxicants Case Studies 1. Cardinia Reservoir • Desalinated water inlet shute location • Inform capital investment 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Map D: Public Open Space Ownership in Metropolitan Melbourne
    2480000 2520000 2560000 2600000 ! JAMIESON ! FLOWERDALE ! ROMSEY ! WOODEND ! Map D: Public open space ownership in the Sunday Creek Reservoir Yarra State Forest entire metropolitan Melbourne area WALLAN ! Kinglake National Park MACEDON ! K E E R C LS L A F Y A R R A C R E E K Rosslynne Reservoir Toorourrong Reservoir Kinglake National Park K E E B R Yarra Ranges National Park C R K U EE G R C C R EW E A J I L ACKSO N V S K S G E C K E C N E R E O E R R R C L E Eildon State Forest E C Y I K BB E R U K R CR ME WHITTLESEA S ! MARYSVILLE ! K KINGLAKE Toolangi State Forest E ! Y D E A A 0 K D 0 R O W 0 E AR OA 0 R E C E N R 0 O K 0 E R L E N S Y D C E O R T C R T 0 R 0 F R N M U S B 4 E D 4 E A R Lerderderg State Park E A L A R B W M H - 4 P C Y N 4 U R S O 2 H 2 A V D WHITTLESEA I L B B L I K I L G IS E E - M W R Legend E Mount Ridley O T Yan Yean Reservoir I P C OD N-WO O V D S RTO Grasslands L U D RE Marysville State Forest PO B E E INT R S A E R K B O A R AD P R N E W O L E T IN B Y L I E T N R R C L FRENC K R I M O L H E E V EK A MA E Y N C R E C D E R R R E S E C K RY CREE R D K E SUNBURY E ! D K M AL A R Matlock State Forest COL O M O H C A C R N R Kinglake National Park D RA E K T B HUME E E S K E A S CRAIGIEBURN D E P R E ! PINNAC E K R Public open space ownership P I C L C E K N KORO E RE E G R S L E E R S A L K O ITKEN A N K E C C REE C E E I REE R T E K C W C T A Djerriwarrh Reservoir R K S G H E E S E N E D K O R O R W C T S N S E N N M S Cambarville State Forest O E K R T Crown land Craigieburn X L E A I B L Grasslands D E R
    [Show full text]