DOCSLIB.ORG

Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline Project Planning and Environment Act 1987 SUGARLOAF INTERCONNECTOR PIPELINE PROJECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO: MINISTER FOR PLANNING ‐ VICTORIA FEDERAL MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, HERITAGE AND THE ARTS: Advisory Committee: Kathryn Mitchell Darrel Brewin Stephen Hancock Nick Wimbush 16 May 2008 Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline: Project Impact Assessment Report Report of the Advisory Committee: 16 May 2008 SUGARLOAF INTERCONNECTOR PIPELINE PROJECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Darrel Brewin, Member Stephen Hancock, Member Nick Wimbush, Member 16 May 2008 Page 2 Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline: Project Impact Assessment Report Report of the Advisory Committee: 16 May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................6 PART 1: BACKGROUND......................................................................................................8 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................9 1.1 THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ........................................................................................9 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................10 1.3 PRELIMINARY WORK..................................................................................................11 1.4 SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS....................................................................................12 1.5 APPROACH TO REPORT ..............................................................................................16 1.6 THE ROLE OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ................................................................17 1.7 OTHER MATTERS........................................................................................................19 2. THE PROPOSAL .................................................................................................23 2.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................23 2.2 WHAT IS PROPOSED?..................................................................................................24 2.3 TIMING AND STAGING ...............................................................................................28 3. LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY FRAMEWORK .............................................29 3.1 STATE LEGISLATION ...................................................................................................29 3.2 STATE GOVERNMENT POLICY ....................................................................................31 3.3 COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATION...............................................................................34 3.4 PLANNING AND APPROVALS PROCESS......................................................................35 4. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION ..................................................................39 PART 2: ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS AND IMPACTS ........................................................43 5. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...........................................................................44 5.1 HYDROLOGY, WATER RESOURCE AND CROSSING ....................................................46 5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY ........................................................................................................50 5.3 GEOMORPHOLOGY .....................................................................................................53 5.4 GEOTECHNICAL..........................................................................................................54 5.5 CONTAMINATED LAND..............................................................................................56 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS .....................................................................................................56 Page 3 Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline: Project Impact Assessment Report Report of the Advisory Committee: 16 May 2008 6. ECOLOGY.............................................................................................................59 6.1 FLORA AND FAUNA....................................................................................................59 6.2 AQUATIC ECOLOGY....................................................................................................71 6.3 IMPLICATIONS OF TRANSFERRING WATER ................................................................76 7. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................84 7.1 SOCIAL IMPACT ..........................................................................................................84 7.2 SOCIO‐ECONOMICS AND TOURISM............................................................................89 7.3 CULTURAL HERITAGE ................................................................................................92 7.4 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ..........................................................................................94 8. AMENITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE ...........................................................98 8.1 CONSTRUCTION DUST................................................................................................98 8.2 NOISE AND VIBRATION ............................................................................................101 8.3 TRAFFIC IMPACT.......................................................................................................104 9. RISK AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT...................................113 9.1 SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK.................................................................................113 9.2 RISK ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT...........................................................................115 9.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ....................................................117 PART 3: RESPONSE TO TERMS OF REFERENCE......................................................121 10. LIKELY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .....................................................122 11. PREFERRED PIPELINE ALIGNMENT ........................................................128 11.1 GOULBURN RIVER OFF‐TAKE ..................................................................................128 11.2 SECTION A................................................................................................................130 11.3 HIGH LIFT PUMP STATION AND BALANCING STORAGE .........................................131 11.4 SECTION B.................................................................................................................133 11.5 SECTION C ................................................................................................................134 11.6 SECTION D................................................................................................................136 11.7 SECTION E.................................................................................................................139 11.8 SECTION F.................................................................................................................141 11.9 SECTION G................................................................................................................142 11.10 SECTION H................................................................................................................145 12. MITIGATION, OFF‐SET, MONITORING & MANAGEMENT.............147 13. MATTERS OF COMMONWEALTH INTEREST.......................................149 Page 4 Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline: Project Impact Assessment Report Report of the Advisory Committee: 16 May 2008 PART 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................156 14. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................157 LIST OF FIGURES 1. The Alliance Preferred Option – the ‘blue line’ 2. Environmental Management Framework Structure LIST OF TABLES 1. Recorded Fish Species 2. Existing Traffic Volume data for Melba Highway APPENDICES 1. Terms of Reference 2. List of Submittors 3. Document List 4. Letter to Mr Skinner and Response 5. Construction Schedule Page 5 Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline: Project Impact Assessment Report Report of the Advisory Committee: 16 May 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sugarloaf Alliance, comprising a partnership between Melbourne Water Corporation, SKM, GHD and John Holland Pty Ltd, propose to construct a 70 kilometre pipeline from the Goulburn River at Killingworth Reserve north of Yea, to the Sugarloaf Reservoir near Yarra Glen. The pipeline is a major element of Victorian Government’s water policy and will deliver up to 75 gigalitres of water per annum from the Goulburn River Catchment to Melbourne. The Government is investing significant funds in the Food Bowl Modernisation Project to update irrigation infrastructure in the Goulburn‐Murray Irrigation District. It is anticipated that this project will save 225 gigalitres per annum of water in a normal irrigation year, of which one third has been allocated for Melbourne’s water supply via the Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline. The proposed pipeline route parallels the Melba Highway for most of its length. North of the Great Dividing Range the pipeline will be 1.75 metres in diameter (for 50 kilometres) and south of the Divide 1.404 metres in diameter (for 20 kilometres). Two pump stations will need to be constructed, a low lift pump station near
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australian Energy Week?
    ALL THE BIG ISSUES. ALL THE KEY PLAYERS. ALL UNDER ONE ROOF. 8 - 11 MAY 2018 | MELBOURNE CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRE | AUSTRALIA 500+ 6x 80+ + 9x 5 ATTENDEES CONFERENCE INDUSTRY ENGAGING TECHNICAL NETWORKING STREAMS SPEAKERS EXHIBITION ROUNDTABLES With key experts from across industry including: The Hon. Josh Frydenberg MP Audrey Zibelman Paul Broad Richard Gross Elisabeth Brinton Minister for Environment and Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Executive General Manager Energy Australian Energy Market Snowy Hydro Ausgrid New Energy Australian Government Operator AGL Energy Kerry Schott Timothy Rourke John Pierce Merryn York Paul Italiano Independent Chair Chief Executive Officer Chairman Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Energy Security Board CitiPower & Powercor Australian Energy Market Powerlink TransGrid Commission REGISTER TODAY! Book before 9 February and save up to $700! +61 (0)2 9977 0565 www.energyweek.com.au Supported by: Organised by: WHAT IS AUSTRALIAN ENERGY WEEK? Australian Energy Week is the annual meeting place for stakeholders of all levels from the entire energy supply chain. From CEOs to new graduates, energy traders to engineers. And everyone in between. So no matter what your role in the sector - Australian Energy Week has something for you. Each year it brings together over 500 representatives from over 200 organisations. It’s an unparalleled opportunity to engage with the leaders of the energy industry, network with your peers and get invaluable market, technology
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Electricity and Gas Retail Markets in Victoria
    Submission to the Review of electricity and gas retail markets in Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) Brotherhood of St Laurence March 2017 About the Brotherhood of St Laurence The Brotherhood of St Laurence (BSL) is an independent non-government organisation with strong community links that has been working to reduce poverty in Australia since the 1930s. Based in Melbourne, but with a national profile, the BSL continues to fight for an Australia free of poverty. We undertake research, service development and delivery, and advocacy with the objective of addressing unmet needs and translating the understandings gained into new policies, new programs and practices for implementation by government and others. Brotherhood of St Laurence 67 Brunswick Street Fitzroy Vic. 3065 ABN 24 603 467 024 Ph. (03) 9483 1183 www.bsl.org.au For further information or to discuss this submission, please contact: Damian Sullivan Research and Policy, Senior Manager, Energy, Equity and Climate Change Brotherhood of St Laurence Email: [email protected] Ph. (03) 9483 1176 Mob. 0414 960 274 Introduction The Brotherhood of St Laurence commends the Victorian Government for undertaking the Review of electricity and gas retail markets in Victoria and we welcome the opportunity to provide a submission. Central to our approach is – energy is an essential service. Without the services energy enables – heating, cooling, lighting, entertainment – households’ health, wellbeing, social and economic participation are all put at risk. Such concerns are not merely academic. We know the numbers of disconnections have increased – forcing some households to go without energy, at the same time we know other households trade off paying their energy bills with other needs such as buying food or participation in school excursions (see for example Chesters 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River – Lake Eildon to the Murray River
    ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF THE GOULBURN RIVER – LAKE EILDON TO THE MURRAY RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF THE GOULBURN RIVER – LAKE EILDON TO THE MURRAY RIVER EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA September 2005 Publication 1010 ISBN 0 7306 7647 1 © Copyright EPA Victoria 2005 This publication is copyright. No part of it may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF THE GOULBURN RIVER – LAKE EILDON TO THE MURRAY RIVER Environmental audit of the Goulburn River Lake Eildon to the Murray River I, John Nolan, of Nolan-ITU Pty Ltd, an environmental auditor appointed pursuant to the Environment Act 1970 (‘the Act’), having: i. been requested by the Environment Protection Authority Victoria on behalf of the Minister for Environment and Water to undertake an environmental audit of the Goulburn River— Lake Eildon to the Murray River—with the primary objective of obtaining the information and understanding required to guide the management of the Goulburn River towards providing a healthier river system. This included improvements towards meeting the needs of the environment and water users, thereby reducing the likelihood of further fish kill events in the future ii. had regard to, among other things, the: • Environment Protection Act 1970 (the Act) • Water Act 1989 • Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 • Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1998 • Fisheries Act 1995 • Heritage River Act 1992 • Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 • Emergency Management Act 1986 • Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Control of Use) Act 1992 • Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 • State Environment Protection Policy (Water of Victoria) 2003 and the following relevant documents • Victorian River Health Strategy • Goulburn Broken Regional Catchment Strategy • Draft Goulburn Broken Regional River Health Strategy • Murray-Darling Basin Commission’s (MDBC) Native Fish Strategy • Goulburn Eildon Fisheries Management Plan iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005/06 OUR MISSION
    goulburn-murray water annual report 2005/06 OUR MISSION To deliver sustainable water services that meet customer and stakeholder needs and support regional economic growth, while balancing social, economic and environmental considerations. OUR VALUES Human safety, the environment and customer service are our highest priorities Sustainability is our commitment to future generations Cooperation based on the involvement of people is the key to progress Openness builds trust, knowledge and understanding Integrity, respect and pride are valued characteristics of our people Continual improvement is essential and underpins our future Contents OUR PERFORMANCE AT A GLANCE - 2005/06 4 GOVERNANCE 9 ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY 13 SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY 25 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 39 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 59 GOULBURN-MURRA APPENDICES 83 Y W A TER Annual Repor t 2005/06 1 Report from the Chairperson scheme (which won the prestigious media reports the excellent work of National Salinity prize and diverts our farmers as they increase water use 22,000 tonnes of salt from the Murray efficiency. Our new information each year), are either finished or caravan, ‘Water Wheels’, now informs nearing completion. both our customers and the public of these changes. The new Water Storage Amenity Unit and our revised approach to leasing We accept our responsibilities to and maintenance of recreation and support regional development and will public use assets have won great use the reconfiguration plans already support from local government and piloted in the Pyramid-Boort irrigation local communities. Essentially, our area as a model in all irrigation policy is to offer longer leases and districts to allow a clear vision to security in return for more investment emerge in each community about the This Board is now in the last year of its by business owners to enhance the future of water use and associated three-year appointment and it is timely appearance and customer satisfaction land zoning and channel maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water Corporation 1998/1999 Annual Report
    MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 1 M ELBOURNE WATER C ORPORATION 1998/1999 A NNUAL R EPORT MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 2 C ONTENTS 2 Chairman’s Report 4 Managing Director’s Overview 6 Business Performance Overview 10 Maximise Shareholder Value 18 Achieve Excellent Customer Service 22 Be a Leader in Environmental Management 28 Fulfil Our Community Obligations 34 Corporate Governance 38 Five Year Financial Summary 39 Financial Statements 33 Statement of Corporate Intent The birds illustrated on the front cover are the Great-billed Heron and the White Egret. MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 1 M ELBOURNE WATER C ORPORATION 1998/1999 A NNUAL R EPORT Melbourne Water is a statutory corporation wholly owned by the Government of Victoria. The responsible Minister is the Hon. Patrick McNamara, Minister for Agriculture and Resources. VISION To be a leader in urban water cycle management P URPOSE Melbourne Water exists to add value for its customers and the community by operating a successful commercial business which supplies safe water, treats sewage and removes stormwater at an acceptable cost and in an environmentally sensitive manner. VALUES Melbourne Water’s values determine its behaviour as an organisation. The values are innovation, cooperation, respect, enthusiasm, integrity and pride. They are a guide to employees on how they should conduct their activities. Through embracing and abiding by the values, employees demonstrate to others the principles by which Melbourne Water conducts its business. 1 MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 2 C HAIRMAN’S REPORT During the year Melbourne Water produced a solid financial result and completed several major projects for the long-term benefit of our customers and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Bandula Kendaragama
    Bandula Kendaragama (Principal, Freelance International Dam Safety Consultant, Melbourne, Australia, ABN 93 559 565 253) - Chronology of projects undertaken from 1978 to 2021. Note: Details of these projects are available in the detailed CV (World Bank format). 165 2020 to 2021 India – Drafting methodology sections of (1) Dam Safety Institutional Strengthening and (2) Dam Instrumentation of the proposal for the World Bank funded Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP), phases 2 and 3, involving approximately 700 dams in 19 states. 164 20 January 2021 Inspections of Mulligan Flat Dam (20 January 2021). 163 19 January 2021 Quarterly dam safety inspection of Scrivener dam, Canberra, Australia. 162 16 December 2020 Training course on Dam Safety Emergency Management Plans (DSEMP) to staff of Thwake CFRD and SMEC Malaysia. 161 September 2020 Safety and Surveillance Services of Scrivener Dam, Canberra (September 2020), Australia. 160 November 2020 Queanbeyan Pond Embankment - Seepage Investigations, ACT, January 2021 Canberra, Australia 159 November 2020 Inspections of 38 Retarding Basins of Melbourne Water, Melbourne, Australia. 158 October to 2020 Annual Dam Safety Inspections of 7 dams, AGL, Victoria, November 2020 Australia. 157 October 2020 Geotechnical investigations of Pond 2 of Queanbeyan - Palerang Regional Council, NSW, Australia. 156 14 October 2020 Training course on Concrete Face Rockfill Dams (CFRD), Site staff of Thwake Dam, SMEC (Malaysia), Irrigation Department (Sri Lanka), Mahaweli Authority (Sri Lanka) and Central Engineering Consultancy Review (Sri Lanka). 155 30 September 2020 Training course on Instrumentation of Concrete Face Rockfill Dams (CFRD), Site staff of Thwake Dam, SMEC (Malaysia), Irrigation Department (Sri Lanka), Mahaweli Authority (Sri Lanka) and Central Engineering Consultancy Review (Sri Lanka).
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Microbial Pollution in Surface Waters and the Coastal Ocean Through a Program of Review, Field Experimentation and Numerical Modelling
    Dynamics of microbial pollution in aquatic systems Matthew Richard Hipsey B.Sc (Hons) (Environmental Science) M.Eng.Sc (Environmental Engineering) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Adelaide School of Earth and Environmental Sciences May 2007 Microbial pollution in aquatic systems M.R. Hipsey Pg iii Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................................xi Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. xiii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................... xvii Preface .................................................................................................................................................. xix Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 An Emerging Threat .............................................................................................................................3 Surrogates for Indicating Pathogen Threats.........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Landscape, People and Economy
    Chapter 3. Landscape, people and economy Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 3. Landscape, people and economy This chapter provides a brief description of the landscape, people and economic drivers in the water resource plan areas. Working rivers The rivers of these water resource plan areas provide many environmental, economic, and social benefits for Victorian communities. Most of northern Victoria’s rivers have been modified from their natural state to varying degrees. These modifications have affected hydrologic regimes, physical form, riparian vegetation, water quality and instream ecology. Under the Basin Plan it is not intended that these rivers and streams be restored to a pre-development state, but that they are managed as ‘working rivers’ with agreed sustainable levels of modification and use and improved ecological values and functions. 3.1 Features of Victorian Murray water resource plan area The Victorian Murray water resource plan area covers a broad range of aquatic environments from the highlands streams in the far east, to the floodplains and wetlands of the Murray River in the far west of the state. There are several full river systems in the water resource plan area, including the Kiewa and Mitta Mitta rivers. Other rivers that begin in different water resource plan areas converge with the River Murray in the Victorian Murray water resource plan area. There are a significant number of wetlands in this area, these wetlands are managed by four catchment management authorities (CMAs): North East, Goulburn Broken, North Central and Mallee and their respective land managers. The Victorian Murray water resource plan area extends from Omeo in the far east of Victoria to the South Australian border in the north west of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Politics in Victoria: the Impact of Legislative Design, Policy
    Water Politics in Victoria The impact of legislative design, policy objectives and institutional constraints on rural water supply governance Benjamin David Rankin Thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Swinburne Institute for Social Research Faculty of Health, Arts and Design Swinburne University of Technology 2017 i Abstract This thesis explores rural water supply governance in Victoria from its beginnings in the efforts of legislators during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to shape social and economic outcomes by legislative design and maximise developmental objectives in accordance with social liberal perspectives on national development. The thesis is focused on examining the development of Victorian water governance through an institutional lens with an intention to explain how the origins of complex legislative and administrative structures later come to constrain the governance of a policy domain (water supply). Centrally, the argument is concentrated on how the institutional structure comprising rural water supply governance encouraged future water supply endeavours that reinforced the primary objective of irrigated development at the expense of alternate policy trajectories. The foundations of Victoria’s water legislation were initially formulated during the mid-1880s and into the 1890s under the leadership of Alfred Deakin, and again through the efforts of George Swinburne in the decade following federation. Both regarded the introduction of water resources legislation as fundamentally important to ongoing national development, reflecting late nineteenth century colonial perspectives of state initiated assistance to produce social and economic outcomes. The objectives incorporated primarily within the Irrigation Act (1886) and later Water Acts later become integral features of water governance in Victoria, exerting considerable influence over water supply decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents
    Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................3 3.5 Healthy Ecosystems ...........................................24 1. Objectives of the Plan ..........................................4 3.5.1 Native Flora and Fauna ............................24 2. Context .......................................................................4 3.5.2 Foreshore Vegetation Management .........25 3.5.3 Pest and Nuisance Plants ........................26 2.1 Lake Eildon Development ....................................4 3.5.4 Pest Animals .............................................27 2.2 Lake Eildon as a Water Supply ............................4 3.5.5 References ...............................................27 2.3 Storage Operations ..............................................5 2.4 Land Status ...........................................................5 3.6 Land Management ..............................................28 2.5 Legal Status ..........................................................5 3.6.1 Permits, Licences and Lease Arrangements ................................28 2.6 Study Area .............................................................5 3.6.2 Fire ............................................................29 3. A Plan for the Management 3.6.3 Foreshore Erosion ....................................30 of Lake Eildon ..........................................................5 3.6.4 Stream Bank Erosion ................................31 3.1 Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Fiftieth Annual Report
    1969 VICTORIA STATE ELECTRICITY COMMISSION OF VICTORIA FIFTIETH ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE, 1969 TOGETHER WITH APPENDICES PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 82 (b) OF STATE ELECTRICITY COMMISSION ACT No. 6377. By Authority: A. C. BROOKS, GOVERNMENT PRINTBR., MELBOURNI!. No. 11.-10560/69.-70 cents State Electricity Corn miss ion of Victoria 50th Annual Report 1968-69 Chairman and General Manager W. H. Connolly, C.B.E., D.Eng.(Hon.), B.E.E., B.Com ., F.I.E.Aust., M.I.E.E.E. (U.S.A.) Commissioners T. P. Scott, F.A.I.I. B. J. Callinan, D.S.O., M.C., B.C.E., F.I.C.E., F.I.E.Aust., F.A.P.I. C. R. Darvall, C.B.E., F.A.S.A. Deputy General Manager N. R. White, M.E., F.I.E.Aust. Assistant General Manager K. L. Murray, F.I.E.Aust. Assistant General Manager J. C. Trethowan, B.Com., A.A.S.A. (Administration) Assistant General Manager G. Paterson, B.C.E., F.I.E.Aust., A.M.A.S.C.E. (Generation and Transmission) Assistant General Manager R. G. Chapman, B.C.E., M.I.E.Aust., M.I.C.E. (Marketing and Distribution) Secretary F. P. Chipperfield, B.Com., J.P. Head Office 15 William Street, Melbourne, 3000 Contents Page Number Summary of Operations 4 Financial Review 7 Revenue Account 11 Balance Sheet 12 Extensions to the State Generating System 14 National Consultative Committee on Nuclear Power 16 Construction 17 Future of Yallourn Township 18 Metropolitan Municipal Electricity Distribution Systems 20 New Legislation 21 Electricity Production 22 Brown Coal Production 23 Briquette Production and Sales .
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Supplement to the Victorian Gas Retail Market
    Technical Supplement to the Victorian Gas Retail Market Issue 1 October 2005 Technical Guide to the Victorian Gas Retail Market Version History Issue Number Effective date Comments 1 Oct 2005 Document prepared to provide a more detailed explanation of the Victorian Gas Retail Market as a technical supplement to the Retail Guide #153761 Page 2 of 44 Technical Guide to the Victorian Gas Retail Market Table of Contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 2 1. WHAT IS THE RETAIL MARKET ?................................................................................ 3 2. WHERE DO THE RETAIL MARKET ARRANGEMENTS APPLY ?............................... 4 3. WHO ARE THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE RETAIL MARKET? ...................................... 5 3.1. Overview..................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. VENCorp (Victorian Energy Network Corporation)................................................ 5 3.3. Retail Businesses...................................................................................................... 5 3.4. Distribution Businesses............................................................................................ 5 3.5. Customers (end users).............................................................................................. 6 3.6. Essential Services Commission (ESC)...................................................................
    [Show full text]