DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft EA to Remove Missiles Malmstrom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft EA to Remove Missiles Malmstrom DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR MINUTEMAN III DEACTIVATION MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA April 2007 COVER SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR MINUTEMAN III DEACTIVATION MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA a. Lead Agency: Department of the Air Force b. Proposed Action: Deactivation of 50 Minuteman III (MM III) Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Launch Facilities (LFs) and 5 Missile Alert Facilities (MAFs) assigned to Malmstrom Air Force Base (AFB), Montana. c. Written comments and inquiries regarding this document should be directed to: Mr. Tony Lucas, 341 CES/CEV, 39 78th Street North, Building 470, Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana 59402, facsimile (406) 731-6181; e-mail [email protected]. d. Designation: Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) e. Abstract: Based on perceived strategic deterrent requirements, the Department of Defense has decided to further streamline and reduce the number of MM III systems deployed (deactivation of 50 LFs and 5 MAFs). This reduction in the number of MM III missiles will not only bring the number of missiles in line with current deterrent requirements, but will also result in reduced defense costs. Deactivation activities are anticipated to be completed within 2 years and would occur in three phases. Phase 1 is the removal of missiles from the LFs. Phase 2 involves the removal of salvageable items from the LFs and MAFs. Phase 3 involves the closure of MAF wastewater treatment facilities (i.e., sewage lagoons) and the removal, closure in place, or inactivation of storage tanks. Following deactivation activities, the gates to the LFs and MAFs would be secured and the sites would be placed into 30% caretaker status. Implosion or dismantlement of the LFs and MAFs is not proposed and is not evaluated in this EA. This EA has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act to analyze the potential environmental consequences of the Proposed Action. Two alternatives were examined: the Proposed Action and a No-Action Alternative. The Proposed Action involves the deactivation of 50 LFs and 5 MAFs associated with a missile squadron (i.e., 10th, 12th, 490th, or 564th) at Malmstrom AFB. The No-Action Alternative involves not implementing deactivation activities. The environmental resources potentially affected by the Proposed Action are socioeconomics, transportation, utilities, land use and aesthetics, hazardous materials management, hazardous waste management, storage tanks, asbestos, lead-based paint, polychlorinated biphenyls, ordnance, soils and geology, water resources, biological resources, cultural resources, and environmental justice. Based on the nature of the activities that would occur under the Proposed Action and No-Action Alternative, the Air Force has determined that minimal or no adverse effects to the above resources are anticipated. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Privacy Advisory Your comments on this draft environmental assessment (EA) are requested. Letters or other written or oral comments provided may be published in the final EA. As required by law, comments will be addressed in the final EA and made available to the public. Any personal information provided will be used only to identify your desire to make a statement during the public comment period or to fulfill requests for copies of the final EA or associated documents. Private addresses will be compiled to develop a mailing list for those requesting copies of the final EA. However, only the names of the individuals making comments and specific comments will be disclosed. Personal home addresses and telephone numbers will not be published in the final EA. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 DRAFT 2 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 3 MISSILE SQUADRON INACTIVATION PROJECT 4 MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA 5 6 7 The attached environmental assessment (EA) analyzes the potential for impacts to the environment as a 8 result of the inactivation of a missile squadron (MS) at Malmstrom Air Force Base (AFB), Montana. The 9 EA was prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended 10 (42 U.S. Code 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing the 11 procedural provisions of NEPA, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 1500-1580, and Air Force 12 policy and procedures (32 CFR Part 989). 13 14 This Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) summarizes the Proposed Action and alternatives and the 15 results of the evaluation of the deactivation of an MS. 16 17 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives 18 19 Proposed Action. The Proposed Action is the inactivation of one of the four Minuteman (MM) III MSs, 20 based at Malmstrom AFB. These are the 10th, 12th, 490th, and 564th MSs. Inactivation of any of these 21 MSs would entail deactivation of the 5 Missile Alert Facilities (MAFs) and 50 Launch Facilities (LFs) 22 associated with that MS. 23 24 The deactivation process is scheduled to be completed within a 2-year time period and would occur in 25 three phases. Phase 1 involves the removal of the missiles from the LFs. Phase 2 involves the removal 26 of salvageable items from the LFs and MAFs. Phase 3 involves the dismantlement of certain portions of 27 the LFs and MAFs. After completion of Phases 1, 2, and 3, the LFs and MAFs would be placed into 30% 28 caretaker status. 29 30 Phase 1 of deactivation involves the removal of the missile (which includes the reentry system [RS], 31 booster stages, and missile guidance system [MGS]). The missiles are scheduled to be removed at a 32 rate of approximately one missile per week. Booster stages would be brought back to Malmstrom AFB, 33 loaded onto a missile transporter, and transported to Hill AFB, Utah. All RSs would be returned to the 34 Department of Energy for disposition. Some MGSs may be transferred to other missile units, stored at 35 Malmstrom AFB for future deployment, or returned to Hill AFB for final disposition. 36 37 Phase 2 of the deactivation process involves the removal of salvageable items from the LFs and MAFs. 38 Classified items and office and living quarter items would be recovered from the MAFs. Fluids would be 39 drained from the fueling, coolant, and hydraulic systems, and electrical filters, switches, and power supply 40 batteries would be removed. Reusable equipment would be placed in the supply system for use by 41 Malmstrom AFB and other bases. On-site water wells would be closed. Operation of environmental 42 control systems (i.e., heating and air conditioning) would be discontinued. Any ordnance at the LFs and 43 MAFs would be removed and transported to the munitions storage area on Malmstrom AFB. 44 45 Phase 3 of deactivation would involve the closure of MAF wastewater treatment facilities (i.e., sewage 46 lagoons), the removal, closure-in-place, or inactivated of storage tanks, elimination of electrical service to 47 the sites, and securing access doors at the sites, with the exception of the closure door, which cannot be 48 sealed permanently due to Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) inspection requirements. The 49 341st Space Wing (SW) may elect to maintain power to LFs and MAFs in order to operate sump pumps 50 and dewatering wells. Sewage lagoon berms would be plowed and leveled to eliminate possible standing 51 water at the sites. Aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) would be removed for use at Malmstrom AFB, 1 1 other MAF sites, or other bases. Underground storage tanks (USTs) would be closed-in-place, removed, 2 or inactivated. 3 4 Upon completion of deactivation activities, the LFs and MAFs would be subject to periodic drive-by 5 inspections to identify vandalism, unauthorized entry, topside flooding, or excessive weed growth. The 6 Air Force would also conduct periodic surveys for erosion, noxious weeds, and liability hazards. Site 7 monitoring would continue until final disposition is determined. This monitoring period could range from a 8 few days to several years. The property occupied by the LFs and MAFs would remain Air Force property, 9 no property disposal actions would occur. 10 11 No-Action Alternative. Under the No-Action Alternative, the Air Force would not deactivate any MS at 12 Malmstrom AFB. 13 14 Summary of Environmental Consequences 15 16 Initial analysis indicates that missile deactivation activities would not result in short- or long-term impacts 17 to airspace, Environmental Restoration Program sites, pesticide usage, radon, medical/biohazardous 18 waste, air quality, and noise. 19 20 The resources analyzed in more detail in the EA are socioeconomics, transportation, utilities (specifically 21 electricity, solid waste, water, and wastewater), land use and aesthetics, hazardous materials and 22 hazardous waste management, storage tanks, asbestos, lead-based paint, polychlorinated biphenyls 23 (PCBs), ordnance, soils and geology, water resources, cultural resources, biological resources, and 24 environmental justice. 25 26 The inactivation of one MS would result in a reduction of approximately 500 personnel at Malmstrom 27 AFB. This reduction in personnel would not have a significant adverse impact to the natural or physical 28 environment. 29 30 An increase in traffic would occur during deactivation activities. This increase would be minimal and 31 temporary during the 2-year deactivation process. Traffic in the inactivated MS area would decrease from 32 current conditions after completion of deactivation. No significant impacts to transportation are expected. 33 34 Inactivation of an MS would eliminate the water use and generation of wastewater and solid waste at 35 5 MAFs and 50 LFs. Wastewater lagoons would be graded. Under caretaker status electrical use at the 36 MAFs and LFs would be eliminated. However, the 341st SW may elect to maintain power to LFs and 37 MAFs in order to operate sump pumps and dewatering wells. Electrical usage would be reduced by an 38 estimated 90 percent from current usage to operate the systems.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015
    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth Air Force - from B-29S to Icbms a Proud Past…A Bright Future
    Twentieth Air Force - From B-29s To ICBMs A Proud Past…A Bright Future by Major General Tom Neary Commander, Twentieth Air Force THE TWENTIETH AIR FORCE LEGACY As I come to work each day, I pass a picture gallery of the former Commanders of Twentieth Air Force. From it, the faces of great leaders like Hap Arnold, Curtis LeMay, and Nathan Twining remind me of the rich heritage of this numbered air force. The great warfighting organization these magnificent Air Force pioneers organized and led during World War II lives on today as "America’s ICBM Team"--modern day professionals carrying on the legacy of air power excellence born in the South Pacific in 1944. We remain linked to the original Twentieth Air Force in many ways. Pictured are Lieutenant Fiske Hanley, WW II veteran, and Captain Keith McCartney, 341st Space Wing, Malmstrom AFB MT. They are past and present representatives of the thousands of courageous airmen who founded, formed and now carry on our superb legacy. Although separated by five decades of history, Hanley and McCartney understand full well how crucial their missions were, and now are to the security of America. They also share another important linkage in history. While Fiske Hanley’s Twentieth Air Force of 1945 employed nuclear weapons to stop a horrible world war, Captain Keith McCartney stands alert in today’s Capt Keith McCartney in command Twentieth Air Force committed to preventing war at a Minuteman III launch control through nuclear deterrence and professional stewardship console of America’s nuclear arsenal. With our legacy as a preface, I invite you to join me on a journey through Twentieth Air Force--from the South Pacific in 1944, to the ICBM fields of rural America today, and on to our bright future as a relevant and important part of America’s national security team.
    [Show full text]
  • Airman Posthumously Receives Medal of Honor
    COMMANDER’S CORNER: HIGH-TOUCH LEADERSHIP - PAGE 2 Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado Thursday, August 2, 2018 Vol. 62 No. 31 Airman posthumously receives Medal of Honor HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) − As a combat controller, Tech. Sgt. John A. Chapman was trained and equipped for immediate deployment into combat operations. Trained to infiltrate in combat and austere environments, he was an experienced static line and military free fall jumper, and combat diver. By Staff Sgt. Ryan Conroy Combat control training is more than two years 24th Special Operations Wing Public Affairs long and amongst the most rigorous in the U.S. military. Only about one in ten Airmen who start the program graduate. HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) — The White From months of rigorous physical fitness train- House announced July 27, 2018, that Air Force ing to multiple joint schools – including military Tech. Sgt. John Chapman will be posthumously SCUBA, Army static-line and freefall, air traffic awarded the Medal of Honor Aug. 22, for his ex- control, and combat control schools – Chapman is traordinary heroism during the Battle of Takur remembered as someone who could do anything Ghar, Afghanistan, in March 2002. put in front of him. According to the Medal of Honor nomination, “One remembers two types of students — Chapman distinguished himself on the battle- the sharp ones and the really dull ones — and field through “conspicuous gallantry and intre- Chapman was in the sharp category,” said Ron pidity,” sacrificing his life to preserve those of his teammates. Childress, a former Combat Control School instructor. Making it look easy Combat Control School is one of the most Chapman enlisted in the Air Force Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall/Winter 2020 THIS NEWSLETTER IS DEDICATED to AIR FORCE
    Fall/Winter 2020 Proudly Announcing our Scholarship Recipients’ Awards (pages 15-17) Salute to Prime BEEF’s Dirt Boyz (below and page 4) LUKE AFB, AZ. Tech. Sgt. Aaron FAIRCHILD AFB, WA. Airman 1st Class BARKSDALE AFB, LA. Sr. Airman Jacob Jones, 56th CES pavements and heavy Manuel Rivera Matos, 92nd CES “Dirt Bishop (center), 2nd CES pavement and equipment operator, shovels dirt. (Photo Boyz” picks up dirt in a front end loader. equipment journeyman, spreads asphalt. by Airman Brooke Moeder) (Photo by Sr. Airman Mackenzie (U.S. AF photo by Sr. Airman Lillian Miller) Richardson) SHAW AFB, SC. U.S. Air Force Sr. Airman LITTLE ROCK AFB, AR. Sr. Airman Allen MALMSTROM AFB. MT. Chief Master Joshua Minton, a pavement and Arceo, a pavement and heavy equipment Sgt. Ron Harper, 341st Missile Wing construction equipment apprentice with the craftsman with the 19th CES, uses a “lute command chief, works with Airmen from “Dirt Boyz” of the 20th CES unit, works on tool” to spread the asphalt evenly. (Photo the 819th RED HORSE and the 341st CES a beautification project. (Photo by Airman by Airman 1st Class Kevin Sommer Giron) (Official), (USAF photo by Sr. Airman 1st Class BrieAnna Stillman) Jacob Thompson) BARKSDALE AFB, LA. Sr. Airman Jeremy MOUNTAIN HOME AFB, ID. 366th EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, AK. U.S. Air Bisaccio and Tech. Sgt. David Torres, 2nd Civil Engineer Squadron Dirt Boyz, Force Airman 1st Class Jerred Davis, a CES heavy equipment operators, back a roller work alongside one another while 354th CES pavement and construction over fresh asphalt.
    [Show full text]
  • Malmstromufo.Pdf
    Wednesday, May 09, 2001 John Greenewa!d, Jr. FOIA Offica 341 CS/SCBR 30 731d Street North Malmstrom AF8 fl.ofT 59402~7513 Dear Sir; This is 2 non-eommercial Freedom of Information Ad request 5 U.S.C. § 552. My fee status category is -AU Other", and I agree to pay only up to fineen dollars for the requested material. a All documents pertaining to a March 16, 1967 incident, in which there was a maljundion of missile silos at your installation. Please include all documentation of procadures after this incident occurred, the possible cause, procedures on how to handle the situation etc. a Please include documents, letters, tapes, audio and video tapes, memos, and all other fonns of written and visual media. a Also include all documents on one of the personnel there getting injured that same day, or around this dats. Thank you very much for your time, and I look forward to your response. Enclosures: None DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 341ST SPACE WING (AFSPC) 14 June 2001 341 CS/SCBR (FOIA) 30 73d Street North Malmstrom AFB MT 59402-7513 Mr. John Greenewald, Jr. Dear Greenewald On 18 May 2001 , we received your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated 9 May 2001, for records pertaining to a March 16, 1967 incident, in which there was a malfunction of missile silos. Copies of excerpts, as well as supporting documents, of the below listed documents are releasable and are attached: a. 341st Strategic Missile Wing History (1 Jan - 31 Mar 1967) b. 341 st Strategic Missile Wing History (1 Apr - 30 Jun 1967) c.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Print
    116TH CONGRESS " 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020 COMMITTEE PRINT of the COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES on H.R. 1158 / Public Law 116–93 [Legislative Text and Explanatory Statement] JANUARY 2020 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 38–678 WASHINGTON : 2020 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS NITA M. LOWEY, New York, Chairwoman MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio KAY GRANGER, Texas PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky JOSE´ E. SERRANO, New York ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama ROSA L. DELAURO, Connecticut MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina JOHN R. CARTER, Texas LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California KEN CALVERT, California SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia TOM COLE, Oklahoma BARBARA LEE, California MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota TOM GRAVES, Georgia TIM RYAN, Ohio STEVE WOMACK, Arkansas C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida CHUCK FLEISCHMANN, Tennessee HENRY CUELLAR, Texas JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER, Washington CHELLIE PINGREE, Maine DAVID P. JOYCE, Ohio MIKE QUIGLEY, Illinois ANDY HARRIS, Maryland DEREK KILMER, Washington MARTHA ROBY, Alabama MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania MARK E. AMODEI, Nevada GRACE MENG, New York CHRIS STEWART, Utah MARK POCAN, Wisconsin STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi KATHERINE M. CLARK, Massachusetts DAN NEWHOUSE, Washington PETE AGUILAR, California JOHN R. MOOLENAAR, Michigan LOIS FRANKEL, Florida JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, Florida CHERI BUSTOS, Illinois WILL HURD, Texas BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, Michigan NORMA J. TORRES, California CHARLIE CRIST, Florida ANN KIRKPATRICK, Arizona ED CASE, Hawaii SHALANDA YOUNG, Clerk and Staff Director (II) C O N T E N T S Page Provisions Applying to All Divisions of the Consolidated Act .............................
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication. the Version of the Proposed Rule R
    This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication. The version of the proposed rule released today may vary slightly from the published document if minor editorial changes are made during the OFR review process. The document published in the Federal Register will be the official document. Appendix A to part 802- List of Military Installations Part 1 Site Name Location Adelphi Laboratory Center Adelphi, MD Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing Maui, HI Site Air Force Office of Scientific Research Arlington, VA Andersen Air Force Base Yigo, Guam Army Futures Command Austin, TX Army Research Lab – Orlando Simulations Orlando, FL and Training Technology Center Army Research Lab – Raleigh Durham Raleigh Durham, NC Arnold Air Force Base Coffee County and Franklin County, TN Beale Air Force Base Yuba City, CA Biometric Technology Center (Biometrics Clarksburg, WV Identity Management Activity) Buckley Air Force Base Aurora, CO Camp MacKall Pinebluff, NC Cape Cod Air Force Station Sandwich, MA Cape Newenham Long Range Radar Site Cape Newenham, AK Cavalier Air Force Station Cavalier, ND Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station Colorado Springs, CO Clear Air Force Station Anderson, AK Creech Air Force Base Indian Springs, NV Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Tucson, AZ Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, VA Eareckson Air Force Station Shemya, AK Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks, AK Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base Houston, TX Fairchild Air Force Base Spokane, WA Fort Benning Columbus, GA Fort Belvoir Fairfax County, VA Fort Bliss El Paso, TX Fort Campbell Hopkinsville, KY Fort Carson Colorado Springs, CO Fort Detrick Frederick, MD Fort Drum Watertown, NY Fort Gordon Augusta, GA Fort Hood Killeen, TX 129 This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Siloed-Thinking.Pdf
    1 siloed thinking: A Closer Look at the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent ABOUT FAS The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that brings together members of the science and policy communities to collaborate on mitigating global catastrophic threats. Founded in November 1945 as the Federation of Atomic Scientists by scientists who built the first atomic bombs during the Manhattan Project, FAS is devoted to the belief that scientists, engineers, and other technically trained people have the ethical obligation to ensure that the technological fruits of their intellect and labor are applied to the benefit of humankind. In 1946, FAS rebranded as the Federation of American Scientists to broaden its focus to prevent global catastrophes. Since its founding, FAS has served as an influential source of information and rigorous, evidence- based analysis of issues related to national security. Specifically, FAS works to reduce the spread and number of nuclear weapons, prevent nuclear and radiological terrorism, promote high standards for the safety and security of nuclear energy, illuminate government secrecy practices, and prevent the use of biological and chemical weapons. The Nuclear Information Project provides the public with reliable information about the status and trends of the nuclear weapons arsenals of the world’s nuclear-armed countries. The project, which according to the Washington Post is “one of the most widely sourced agencies for nuclear warhead counts,” uses open sources such as official documents, testimonies, previously undisclosed information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, as well as independent analysis of commercial satellite imagery as the basis for developing the best available unclassified estimates of the status and trends of nuclear weapons worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98Th Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Federal Metrology and Calibration Capabilities
    NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 546 Q 1 979 Edition U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/National Bureau of Standards National Bureau "of Standards Library, E-01 Admin. Bidg. Catalog o Federal Metrology and Calibration Capabilities NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau's technical work is performed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory, and the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology. THE NATIONAL MEASUREMENT LABORATORY provides the national system of physical and chemical and materials measurement; coordinates the system with measurement systems of other nations and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical and chemical measurement throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce; conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measurement, standards, and data on the properties of materials needed by industry, commerce, educational institutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other Government Agencies; develops,
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN SENTRY Team Minot Hosts Distinguished Visitors
    FREE | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | VOL. 59 • ISSUE 20 | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | FRIDAY, MAY 14, 2021 OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP AWARDS 2021 Congratulations to the four winners of The Huddle’s 2021 Outstanding Leadership Award! Out of 27 nominees, these four were selected for their dedication to the mission and fellow Airmen, and their excellent leadership skills. To see more about The Huddle Awards, see pages A4-A5 U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTOS ENTER WE’LL BUY WEEKLY! No Limit, Enter As Many Times YOU DINNER! As You Wish! blgrill.com i 1400 31st ave i minot, nd i 701-852-7335 DETAILS ON PAGE C3 HOME OF THE GLOBAL STRIKER Minot AFB Videos Only The BEST Come North! WWW.MINOT.AF.MIL CONTACT MINOT AFB PUBLIC AFFAIRS 701.723.6212 • [email protected] Minot Air Force Base 2 FRIDAY, MAY 14 2021 NORTHERN SENTRY Team Minot hosts distinguished visitors ABIGAIL KINDER, NORTHERN SENTRY As the United States Air their leadership. We were able to Will there be problems with Force moves into a newer era of join civic leaders with [military] the budget? Sen. Hoeven said, strategic deterrence, leaders from leaders last evening and engage “Everything gets debated in all over the country are taking them in discussions as well, and Washington D.C. The budget, part in important discussions talk about the level of support for based on conversations I’ve about the future and reliability our service members...” had... is doing well in the Senate. of the nation’s nuclear force. After the brief, visitors There’s been more pushback in On April 30, 2021, Team Minot were given a tour of a B-52 the House, but I think we’re hosted several distinguished Stratofortress and were able to going to be on track.” visitors for an exclusive tour of fi nd out more information about Hoeven explained that the the base and an opportunity to the 5th Bomb Wing mission GBSD is already in development learn about what Team Minot and Global Strike Command as and has plans to be completed does on a day-to-day basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services Articles of Interest May 2018
    Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services Articles of Interest May 2018 RECRUITMENT & RETENTION 1. Army issues waivers to more than 1,000 recruits for bipolar, depression, self-mutilation (26 Apr) USA Today, By Tom Vanden Brook The Army issued waivers over 13 months to more than 1,000 recruits who had been diagnosed and treated for mood disorders and 95 more for self-mutilation, according to data obtained by USA TODAY. 2. Military Children: Strong, Resilient, Adaptable Individuals (27 Apr) 11th Wing, By Air Force Airman 1st Class Valentina Viglianco She said her father is a big role model in her life and a big influence. She even joined her school's Air Force Junior ROTC and said she wants to follow in her father's footsteps and fight for freedom just like he did. 3. Airman Fulfills Long-Held Dream of Military Service (30 Apr) 149th Fighter Wing, By Air Force Airman 1st Class Katie Schultz After watching her school’s ROTC drill team perform during her freshman year of high school, Rosa Vittori decided she would join the Air Force. 4. Joint Base Charleston Showcases Space and STEM (1 May ) Joint Base Charleston, By Air Force Airman 1st Class Allison Payne Over the years, a trend has grown in the push for younger generations to receive STEM education. Recognizing this, the Air Force’s Air Mobility Command prioritizes the creation of partnerships with local and public schools to provide insight into the Air Force while enhancing educational experiences. 5. Naturalizations drop 65 percent for service members seeking citizenship after Mattis memo (3 May) Military Times, By Tara Copp The number of service members applying for and earning U.S.
    [Show full text]