DOCSLIB.ORG

IEE: Federated States of Micronesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IEE: Federated States of Micronesia Yap Renewable Energy Development Project (RRP FSM 44469) Linked Document 12 Initial Environmental Examination Federated States of Micronesia: Strengthening the Capacity of Pacific Developing Member Countries to Respond to Climate Change (Phase 1) - Yap Renewable Energy Project Prepared for the Asian Development Bank ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CO2e – carbon dioxide equivalent EHS – environmental, health, and safety EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan GHG – greenhouse gas HPO - Historic Preservation Office IEE – initial environmenal examination PMU – project management uffice USFS - US Forest Service YSO - Yap Statistical Office YSPSC - Yap State Public Service Corporation WEIGHTS AND MEASURES M – meter m2 – square meter m3 – cubic meter m3/h – cubic meter per hour mm – millimeter mg/l – milligram per liter mg/m3 – milligram per cubic meter Mt/y – million ton per year MW – megawatt The initial environmental examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the ADB’s Board of Directors, management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 A. Background .............................................................................................................. 1 B. Policy, Legal and Institutional Arrangements ............................................................ 1 C. Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines .......................................................... 3 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 4 A. Project Overview ....................................................................................................... 4 B. Development Context ............................................................................................... 4 C. Subproject Descriptions ............................................................................................ 5 D. Area of Influence ....................................................................................................... 9 E. Study Area .............................................................................................................. 11 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT—BASELINE 12 A. Regional Environmental Setting .............................................................................. 12 B. Subproject Localities Environmental Setting ........................................................... 17 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 24 A. Positive Impacts and Environmental Benefits.......................................................... 24 B. Impacts and Mitigation during the Design and Pre-construction Phase ................... 26 C. Impacts and Mitigation Measures during the Construction Phase ........................... 28 D. Impacts and Mitigation Measures during the Operational Phase ............................. 29 E. Environmental, Health, and Safety (Construction and Operational Phases) ............ 35 V. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 36 A. Framework for Public Consultation ......................................................................... 36 B. Public Consultation ................................................................................................. 36 C. Information Dissemination....................................................................................... 36 D. Interview Questionnaire .......................................................................................... 37 E. Future Public Consultation ...................................................................................... 39 VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 40 A. Proposed Mechanism ............................................................................................. 40 VII. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 42 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 42 B. Responsibilities for Implementation ......................................................................... 42 C. Summary of Potential Impacts ................................................................................ 42 D. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................ 43 E. Environmental Management Costs ......................................................................... 46 F. Environmental Monitoring ....................................................................................... 47 G. Monitoring Management ......................................................................................... 48 H. Monitoring Costs ..................................................................................................... 48 VIII. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 49 I. Benefits ................................................................................................................... 49 J. Impacts ................................................................................................................... 49 K. Climate Change ...................................................................................................... 50 L. Risks ....................................................................................................................... 50 M. Assurances ............................................................................................................. 50 N. Follow-Up Monitoring and Environmental Management Requirements ................... 50 O. Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 50 APPENDIX 1: REFERENCES 52 APPENDIX 2: FLORA AND FAUNA SURVEY 53 APPENDIX 3: REPORT ON THE HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROPOSED WINDMILL FARM ON YAP ISLAND 82 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Yap State and ADB EIA Requirements This Project, to support the Yap State Public Service Corporation (YSPSC) in its efforts to reduce its use of diesel fuel for electricity generation, has three primary technical divisions: (i) generation using solar energy; (ii) generation using wind energy; and (iii) improved fuel efficiency through the use of a modern diesel engine of a size that is best suited to the base load seen by YSPSC. The purpose of this IEE is to ensure that the project will be environmentally acceptable. The environmental impact assessment of these developments falls under the provisions of the Yap State Environmental Protection Agency Regulations issued by the Chairperson of the Yap EPA the Yap State Environmental Protection Act (YSL 3-73). The regulations require that all projects require a Preliminary Environmental Impact statement (PEIS), unless exempted. The purpose of a PEIS is to determine whether environmental impacts associated with a project are sufficiently significant that a full Environmental Impact Statement is required. The PEIS also ensures that projects without significant environmental impacts are still provided with appropriate impact mitigation and impact minimilisation measures. Under the ADB classification system, which reflects the significance of a project’s potential environmental impacts, the Yap Renewable Energy Project has been assigned Category B. A project is classified as category B if its potential adverse environmental impacts are site- specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and in most cases can be successfully mitigated. For a category B Project, an Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) is required. This IEE has been prepared under the provisions of the ADB’s safeguard policy It has been determined by the PPTA team that a Project IEE prepared under the provisions of the ADB’s safeguard policy would also satisfy all the requirements under the Yap State Environmental Protection Agency Regulations. The Findings of the Assessment The major findings of the IEE are that the proposed project is an environment-friendly project which will result in substantial energy saving and GHG emission reduction and improve the energy infrastructure of Yap State. The energy savings have been estimated and are shown in the table below. In addition to the significant total savings in gallons of fuel per year is the prevention of associated pollutants from combustion of fossil fuels entering the local airshed. Energy Savings Equivalent Fossil Fuel Renewable Energy Subproject Saving 57,467 gals/a New diesel generator at Power - Plant (savings through increased fuel efficiency) Phase 1 (2 turbines) 805 MWh 58,333 gals/a Wind turbine installation Phase 2 (5 turbines (2 from Phase 1 plus 2,127 MWh 154,130 gals/a an additional 3) Solar Panels 462 MWh 33,478 gals/a Source: PPTA team from data provided by YSPSC. A range of potential impacts have been identified along with measures to avoid or minimize them. Impacts identified during the design and feasibility stages have been minimized through design revisions and will continue through site adjustments to avoid significant flora and fauna elements and items of historical heritage (World War II relics) in situ. These will be mandated by the EMP and supported by a range of other environmental management prescriptions. In particular, the retention of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In China: Phylogeny, Host Range, and Pathogenicity
    Persoonia 45, 2020: 101–131 ISSN (Online) 1878-9080 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.04 Cryphonectriaceae on Myrtales in China: phylogeny, host range, and pathogenicity W. Wang1,2, G.Q. Li1, Q.L. Liu1, S.F. Chen1,2 Key words Abstract Plantation-grown Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) and other trees residing in the Myrtales have been widely planted in southern China. These fungal pathogens include species of Cryphonectriaceae that are well-known to cause stem Eucalyptus and branch canker disease on Myrtales trees. During recent disease surveys in southern China, sporocarps with fungal pathogen typical characteristics of Cryphonectriaceae were observed on the surfaces of cankers on the stems and branches host jump of Myrtales trees. In this study, a total of 164 Cryphonectriaceae isolates were identified based on comparisons of Myrtaceae DNA sequences of the partial conserved nuclear large subunit (LSU) ribosomal DNA, internal transcribed spacer new taxa (ITS) regions including the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal DNA operon, two regions of the β-tubulin (tub2/tub1) gene, plantation forestry and the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) gene region, as well as their morphological characteristics. The results showed that eight species reside in four genera of Cryphonectriaceae occurring on the genera Eucalyptus, Melastoma (Melastomataceae), Psidium (Myrtaceae), Syzygium (Myrtaceae), and Terminalia (Combretaceae) in Myrtales. These fungal species include Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis, Celoporthe syzygii, Cel. eucalypti, Cel. guang­ dongensis, Cel. cerciana, a new genus and two new species, as well as one new species of Aurifilum. These new taxa are hereby described as Parvosmorbus gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Costion Plant Endemism 133-166 PROOFS
    Micronesica 41(1): 131–164, 2009 Plant Endemism, Rarity, and Threat in Palau, Micronesia: A Geographical Checklist and Preliminary Red List Assessment 1 CRAIG M. COSTION Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5001 [email protected] ANN HILLMANN KITALONG The Environment, Inc., P.O. Box 1696, Koror, Palau 96940 TARITA HOLM Palau Conservation Society/PALARIS, P.O. Box 1811, Koror, Palau, 96940 Abstract—An official checklist of the endemic plant species of Palau has been long awaited, and is presented here for the first time. For each species a substrate limitation, growth form, and relative abundance is listed. In addition an IUCN red list assessment was conducted using all available data. For over half of the endemic species there is insufficient data to provide a red listing status however an expected minimum number of threatened plants out of the total is inferred. Approximately 15% of Palau’s endemic plants are believed to be only known from the type collection and many more only known from a few collections. These taxa however may now be prioritized and targeted for future inventory and research. The taxonomic robustness of several of these taxa is questionable and it is expected that more endemic species will be lost to synonymy in the future. Previous estimations have significantly over-estimated the rate of plant endemism in Palau (e.g., 194). Here, 130 plants are recognized for Palau, making its level of plant endem- ism comparable to some of its neighboring Micronesian islands to the east, notably Guam and Pohnpei.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands
    PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 161 Botanical survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands July 2008 Joan M. Yoshioka 1 1 Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit (University of Hawai`i at Mānoa), NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawai`i National Park, HI 96718 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718, phone: 808-985-6183, fax: 808-985-6111 Recommended Citation: Yoshioka, J. M. 2008. Botanical survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report 161, University of Hawai`i at Manoa, Department of Botany, Honolulu, HI. Key words: Vegetation types, Vegetation management, Alien species, Endemic species, Checklist, Ferns, Flowering plants Place key words: War in the Pacific National Historical Park, Guam Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Mail to: mailto:[email protected]) i Table of Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................iii List of Figures ....................................................................................................iii
    [Show full text]
  • Stratégie Pour La Biodiversité De Wallis Et Futuna
    Stratégie pour la Biodiversité de Wallis et Futuna SOMMAIRE SOMMAIRE ............................................................................................................................................... TABLE DES FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. ABREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Contexte de la stratégie............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Cadre de travail du PROE .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3Vision ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. CONTEXTE....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Géographie et Climat ................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Contexte social, économique et politique ................................................................................ 4 3. ESPECES PRESENTES, ECOSYSTEMES ET SERVICES .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands' HAROLD ST
    The Vascular Plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands' HAROLD ST. JOHN2 AND ALBERT C. SMITHs ABSTRACT: Recent botanical collections by H. S. McKee and Douglas E. Yen, together with the few available records from published papers, have been collated into a checklist of the known vascular plants of the Horne and Wallis Islands. Of 248 species here listed, 170 appear to be indigenous. Many of these are widespread, but 45 of them are limited to the Fijian Region (New Hebrides to Samoa) . Of the four known endemic species, Elatostema yenii St. John and Peperomia fllttmaensis St. John are herewith proposed as new, and a new combination in the fern genus Tbelypteris, by G. Brownlie, is included. THE HORNE AND WALLIS ISLANDS, forming Alofi, and Uvea, and it seems pertinent to bring the French Protectorat des Iles Wallis et Futuna, together the available data on the vascular plants lie to the northeast of Fiji, due west of Samoa, of the area. In the present treatment all the and due east of Rotuma. The Horne Islands in­ specimens obtained by McKee and Yen are clude Futuna (with about 25 square miles) and cited, and we also include as many Burrows Alofi (with about 11 square miles) , lying some specimens as could be located in the herbarium 150 miles northeast of Vanua Levu and about of the Bishop Museum. We have also listed 100 miles southwest of Uvea. Both Futuna and several species for which no herbarium vouch­ Alofi are high islands with fringing coral reefs; ers are at hand. These latter records are included the former attains an elevation of about 760 m on the basis of apparently reliable reports of in Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Federated States of Micronesia's Forest Resources, 2006
    Federated States of Micronesia’s Forest Resources, 2006 Joseph A. Donnegan, Sarah L. Butler, Olaf Kuegler, and Bruce A. Hiserote Yap Chuuk Kosrae Pohnpei Yap Chuuk Pohnpei Kosrae Resource Bulletin United States Forest Pacific Northwest PNW-RB-262 Department of Service Research Station October 2011 Agriculture The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Authors Joseph A. Donnegan is an ecologist, Sarah L.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants of Samoa
    FLOWERING PLANTS OF SAMOA BY ERLING CHRISTOPHERSEN HONOLULU, HAWAII PUBLISHEDBY THE MUSEUM February 21, 1935 KRAUS REPRINT CO. New York 1971 CONTENTS PAGS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Mono~otyledon~ae.......................................................................................................................... 6 Family 1. Pandanaceae ........................................................................................................ 6 Family 2. Hydrocharitaceae 6 Family 3. Gramineae ............................................................................................................ 6 Family 4. Cyperageae .......................................................................................................... 15 Family 5. Palmae .................................................................................................................. 25 Family 6- Araceae ................................................................................................................ 39 Family 7. Lemnaceae ............................................................................................................ 44 Family 8. Flagellariaceae 44 Family g. Bromeliaceae ...................................................................................................... 47 Family lo. Commelinaceae .................................................................................................. 48 . Family
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Plant Names in the Lesser Sunda Islands
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series D - 83 DICTIONARY OF PLANT NAMES IN THE LESSER SUNDA ISLANDS Jilis AJ. Verheijen, SVD Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNNERSITY Verheijen, J.A.J.S. Dictionary of plant names in the Lesser Sunda Islands. D-83, iv + 271 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1990. DOI:10.15144/PL-D83.cover ©1990 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIFIC LINGUISTICS is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIESA: Occasional Papers SERIES C: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIESD: SpecialPublications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A Wunn EDITORIAL BOARD: K.A Adelaar, T.E. Dutton, AK. Pawley, M.D. Ross, D.T. Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender K.A. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics David Bradley H.P. McKaughan LaTrobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhllusler Monash University Bond University S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. KJ. Franklin K.L. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W. Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W. Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii Universityof Pennsylvania M.A.K. Halliday W.A.L. Stokhof University of Sydney University of Leiden E. Haugen B.K. T'sou Harvard University City Polytechnic of Hong Kong A. Healey E.M. Uhlenbeck Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Leiden L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CV: Snow 2018
    1 NEIL SNOW, PH.D. Curriculum Vitae CURRENT POSITION Associate Professor of Botany Curator, T.M. Sperry Herbarium Department of Biology, Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, KS 66762 620-235-4424 (phone); 620-235-4194 (fax) http://www.pittstate.edu/department/biology/faculty/neil-snow.dot ADJUNCT APPOINTMENTS Missouri Botanical Garden (Associate Researcher; 1999-present) University of Hawaii-Manoa (Affiliate Graduate Faculty; 2010-2011) Au Sable Institute of Environmental Studies (2006) EDUCATION Ph.D., 1997 (Population and Evolutionary Biology); Washington University in St. Louis Dissertation: “Phylogeny and Systematics of Leptochloa P. Beauv. sensu lato (Poaceae: Chloridoideae)”. Advisor: Dr. Peter H. Raven. M.S., 1988 (Botany); University of Wyoming. Thesis: “Floristics of the Headwaters Region of the Yellowstone River, Wyoming”. Advisor: Dr. Ronald L. Hartman B.S., 1985 (Botany); Colorado State University. Advisor: Dr. Dieter H. Wilken PREVIOUS POSITIONS 2011-2013: Director and Botanist, Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana 2007-2011: Research Botanist, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 1998-2007: Assistant then Associate Professor of Biology and Botany, School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado 2005 (sabbatical). Project Manager and Senior Ecologist, H. T. Harvey & Associates, Fresno, CA 1997-1999: Senior Botanist, Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane, Australia 1990-1997: Doctoral student, Washington University in St. Louis; Missouri Botanical Garden HERBARIUM CURATORIAL EXPERIENCE 2013-current: Director
    [Show full text]
  • Collection and Utilization of Germplasm Resources of Myrtaceae Wild Plants in China
    Journal of Plant Sciences 2019; 7(6): 151-157 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/jps doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190706.14 ISSN: 2331-0723 (Print); ISSN: 2331-0731 (Online) Collection and Utilization of Germplasm Resources of Myrtaceae Wild Plants in China Xiong Binghong 1, 2, *, Liu Chunyan 3, Xiong Xinlan 3, Xu Zhifang 1, Zhao Liyun 1, Tan Haibo 1, Qiu Shengxiang 1, Ai Caixia 4, Lin Shiquan 4, Huang Xiongyao 5, Chen Jian 5, Luo Lian 6, Tang Li 6, Yu Shujun 7, * 1South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China 2Guangdong Provincal Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Guangzhou, China 3Shunde Economic Plant Breeding Center of South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Foshan, China 4Guangdong Sen Lin Creates Green Limited Company, Guangzhou, China 5Dianbai Forestry Science Research Institute, Maoming, China 6Department of Ecology and Environment, Guangdong Environmental Protection Engineering Vocational College, Foshan, China 7College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Xiong Binghong, Liu Chunyan, Xiong Xinlan, Xu Zhifang, Zhao Liyun, Tan Haibo, Qiu Shengxiang, Ai Caixia, Lin Shiquan, Huang Xiongyao, Chen Jian, Luo Lian, Tang Li, Yu Shujun. Collection and Utilization of Germplasm Resources of Myrtaceae Wild Plants in China. Journal of Plant Sciences . Vol. 7, No. 6, 2019, pp. 151-157. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20190706.14 Received : October 6, 2019; Accepted : November 11, 2019; Published : November 18, 2019 Abstract: Myrtaceae is an important group of higher plants, the eighth family of angiosperms, with 134 genera, 5500-5900 species, mainly distributed in tropical America, Oceania and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGICAL IMPACT of MYRTLE RUST (Austropuccinia Psidii) in a WET SCLEROPHYLL FOREST
    ECOLOGICAL IMPACT OF MYRTLE RUST (Austropuccinia psidii) IN A WET SCLEROPHYLL FOREST Santiago Diaz Torres Bachelor of Biological Sciences Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Biological, and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering Queensland University of Technology 2021 1 Keywords Acmena smithii, Archirhodomyrtus beckleri, Austropuccinia psidii, canopy gap fraction, Decaspermum humile, ecological communities, ecological impact, ecological populations, ecological succession, forest structure, Gossia hillii, invasive species, Myrtaceae, myrtle rust, Rhodamnia maideniana, pathogen spillover, plant-pathogenic fungi, plant–soil feedback, species composition, specific leaf area, light availability, soil nutrients, South East Queensland, Tallebudgera Valley, vegetation monitoring program, wet sclerophyll forest Ecological impact of myrtle rust (Austropuccinia psidii) in a wet sclerophyll forest 2 Abstract Myrtle rust is an infection caused by Austropuccinia psidii, a fungal pathogen that threatens the persistence of plant species within the Myrtaceae family. Myrtle rust was first detected in Australia in April 2010 on the central coast of New South Wales. Myrtle rust originates from South America and has now also spread to other regions where Myrtaceae species are native, including New Caledonia, South Africa, Indonesia, Singapore and New Zealand. The Myrtaceae family is the largest plant family in Australia with over 2250 species and 70 genera. The species of this family make up a large proportion of iconic Australian forests such as dry and wet sclerophyll forests. The importance of studying the ecological impacts of myrtle rust in wild populations has been highlighted in multiple studies in Australia. Understanding its effects in the field will help in the prioritisation of species and environments at risk and understand how plant communities will change over time in response to myrtle rust infection.
    [Show full text]