DOCSLIB.ORG

An Essay in Universal History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Essay in Universal History AN ESSAY IN UNIVERSAL HISTORY From an Orthodox Christian Point of View VOLUME II: THE AGE OF REASON (1453 to 1789) PART 2: from 1660 to 1789 Vladimir Moss © Copyright Vladimir Moss, 2017: All Rights Reserved The good of the people must be the great purpose of government. By the laws of nature and of reason, the governors are invested with power to that end. And the greatest good of the people is liberty. It is to the state what health is to the individual. Diderot, Encyclopedia. Whatever I feel to be right is right, what I feel to be wrong is wrong; the best of all casuists is the conscience… Reason deceives us only too often and we have earned all too well the right to reject it, but conscience never deceives. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract. I love the cause of liberty, but the madness of the multitude is but one degree better than submission to the Tea Act. James Allen of Philadelphia. As for My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. My people! Those who lead you cause you to err, and destroy the way of your paths. Isaiah 3.12 By God’s dispensation it has fallen to me to correct both the state and the clergy; I am to them both sovereign and patriarch; they have forgotten that in [pagan] antiquity these [roles] were combined… I have conquered an empire, but have never been able to conquer myself. Tsar Peter the Great. Of course, I recognize that my famous ancestor had many merits, but I must admit that I would be insincere if I repeated your raptures. This is the ancestor whom I love less than others because of his obsession with western culture and his trampling on all purely Russian customs. One must not impose foreign things immediately, without reworking them. Perhaps this time it was necessary as a transitional period, but I do not sympathize with it. Tsar Nicholas II on Peter the Great. The State, it seems to me, is not made for religion, but religion for the State. Abbé Guillaume Raynal (1780). In a democratic state, one must be continually on guard against the desire for popularity. It leads to aping the behaviour of the worst. And soon people come to think that it is of no use – indeed, it is dangerous – to show too plain a superiority over the multitude which one wants to win over. Madame Germaine de Stael: On Literature and Society (1800). The majority does not confirm the truth, but only indicates the wishes of the majority. Empress Catherine the Great. Monarchies conform best to human nature, and therefore constitute the most durable form of state. Gianbattista Vico. 2 3 III. THE AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT (1660-1789) 6 35. THE SUN KING 7 36. THE RESTORATION OF THE MONARCHY 12 37. THE NEWTONIAN REVOLUTION AND THE BIRTH OF MODERNITY 21 38. “THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION” 28 39. THE SOCIAL CONTRACT 34 40. CAPITALISM AND THE JEWS 45 41. THE IDEA OF RELIGIOUS TOLERATION 56 42. THE PEACE OF UTRECHT AND THE RISE OF PRUSSIA 63 43. ENGLAND’S CONSERVATIVE ENLIGHTENMENT 70 44. FRANCE’S RADICAL ENLIGHTENMENT 81 45. HUME: THE IRRATIONALITY OF RATIONALISM 93 46. KANT: THE REAFFIRMATION OF WILL 101 47. HAMANN AND HERDER: THE DENIAL OF UNIVERSALISM 106 48. TWO CONCEPTS OF FREEDOM 109 49. THE ORIGINS OF FREEMASONRY 116 50. THE GRAND ORIENT 124 51. FREEMASONRY AND THE JEWS 127 52. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: (1) THE CAUSES 131 53. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: (2) THE CONSEQUENCES 136 54. THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: (3 )POLITICS AND RELIGION 146 55. SAUDI WAHHABISM 161 56. THE DARK HEART OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT 165 57. EAST MEETS WEST: JAPAN AND CHINA 173 58. ROUSSEAU: PROPHET OF THE REVOLUTION 182 IV. THE ST. PETERSBURG AUTOCRACY (1660-1789) 198 59. TSAR VERSUS PATRIARCH 199 60. PATRIARCH NIKON ON THE SYMPHONY OF POWERS 208 4 61. THE REBELLION OF THE OLD RITUALISTS 214 62. PETER THE GREAT: (1) FROM HOLY RUS’ TO GREAT RUSSIA 223 63. PETER THE GREAT: (2) RUSSIA AND THE WEST 229 64. PETER THE GREAT: (3) RUSSIA THE THIRD ROME 236 65. PETER THE GREAT: (4) THE SHACKLING OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH 240 66. PETER THE GREAT: (5) CHRIST OR ANTICHRIST? 251 67. THE DEGRADATION OF THE RUSSIAN AUTOCRACY 256 68. THE GERMAN PERSECUTION OF ORTHODOXY 259 69. TSARITSA ELIZABETH 263 70. ORTHODOXY UNDER THE AUSTRIAN YOKE 271 71. CATHERINE THE GREAT: (1) THE NOBILITY 275 72. CATHERINE THE GREAT: (2) THE UKRAINIANS AND THE POLES 280 73. CATHERINE THE GREAT: (4) THE JEWS 290 74. CATHERINE THE GREAT: (5) THE CHURCH AND MASONRY 299 5 III. THE AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT (1660-1789) 6 35. THE SUN KING If the liberalism of Northern Europe and North America was the wave of the future, and would in time conquer almost the whole world, nevertheless the seventeenth century was, in political and cultural terms, the century of French absolutism… If we compare the English monarchy in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries with the French one in the same period, we see a striking contrast. In England a powerful monarchy becomes steadily stronger, defeating the most powerful despotism of the day in the Spanish Armada, only to be gradually overcome by the wealthier classes and reduced, finally, to the position of symbolic head of an essentially aristocratic society. The vital changes here, as we have seen, were the rejection of the papacy and the dissolution of the monasteries, which caused both the temporary increase in the monarchy’s power and its longer-term descent into impotence, especially after Charles I’s loss of the power of taxation. In France, on the other hand, the reverse took place: a weak monarchy besieged by a semi-independent nobility within and the united Hapsburg domains of Germany, Italy and Spain from without, gradually recovered to reach a pinnacle of fame and power under the sun king, Louis XIV. The vital factors here were: (i) the invocation of the Divine Right of kings1, (ii) the retention of Catholicism as the official religion, (ii) the monarchy’s retention, in accordance with its Concordat with the Vatican, of control of the Church’s appointments and lands, and (iii), last but not least, the monarchy’s retention of the power of general taxation – although its venal and unjust use of it contributed greatly to the regime’s ultimate fall in 1789.2 Both England and France had consolidated their internal unity by the end of the period, but in different ways that gave to each the complex character of the modern nation-state. In England, the monarchy adopted the Anglican middle ground. In France, on the other hand, the monarchy took the Catholic side (Paris, as Henry IV said when he converted to Catholicism, was worth a mass), from which it did not waver until the revolution of 1789. In England, the Protestant aristocracy first persecuted and then tolerated the diminished and tamed Catholic minority; but the latter’s eventual absorption within the State left a permanent traditionalist stamp on the English national character. In France, on the other hand, while the Catholic monarchy first tolerated and then expelled the Protestant (Huguenot) minority, the latter’s cultural heritage left a permanent rationalist stamp on the French national character. * 1 Thus in France in 1614 the bourgeois order in the Estates General made the Divine Right of Kings Article I of their petition. See Jacques Barzun, From Dawn to Decadence, 1500 to the Present, New York: Perennial, 2000, p. 248. 2 Fukuyama, The Origins of Political Order, London: Profile, 2012, chapter 23. 7 The fruit of Bodin’s absolutist theories and Richelieu’s nationalist politics was the reign of the Sun King, Louis XIV, a true despot in that, like every despot, he tried to gain control of the Church and the nobility. “The position of the French nobility,” writes Jasper Ridley, “had greatly changed during the previous hundred years. In the sixteenth century the great noble houses of Guise and Bourbon, with their power bases in eastern and south-west France, had torn the kingdom apart by thirty years of civil war; and the fighting between the nobility and the State had started up again in the days of the Fronde, when Louis XIV was a child. But when he came of age, and established his absolute royal authority, he destroyed the political power of the nobles by bribing them to renounce it. He encouraged them to come to his court at Versailles, to hold honorific and well-paid sinecure offices – to carve for the King at dinner, or to attend his petit levée when he dressed in the morning, and hand him his shirt, his coat and his wig. He hoped that when the nobles were not engaged in these duties at court, they would be staying in their great mansions in Paris. He wished to prevent them as far as possible from living on their lands in the country, where they could enrol their tenants in a private army and begin a new civil war. “The King governed France through middle-class civil servants, who were mostly lawyers. The provincial Parlements had limited powers, most of which were judicial rather than legislative; but the King could veto all their decrees. The government was administered by the intendants, who had absolute authority in their districts, and were subject only to the directives of their superiors, the surintendants, who were themselves subject only to the King’s Council, where the King presided in person, and might either accept or reject the advice given to him by his councillors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    The Historical Review/La Revue Historique Vol. 16, 2019 Thinking Europe on Europe’s margins: Alexander Sturdza, Konstantinos Oikonomos and Russian- Greek orthodoxy in the early nineteenth century Dialla Ada https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.22823 Copyright © 2020 Ada Dialla To cite this article: Dialla, A. (2020). Thinking Europe on Europe’s margins: Alexander Sturdza, Konstantinos Oikonomos and Russian- Greek orthodoxy in the early nineteenth century. The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, 16, 141-166. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.22823 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 29/09/2021 11:57:48 | THINKING EUROPE ON EUROPE’S MARGINS: ALEXANDER STURDZA, KONSTANTINOS OIKONOMOS AND RUSSIAN-GReeK ORTHODOXY IN THE EARLY NINeteeNTH CENTURY Ada Dialla Abstract: This article seeks to examine the construction of the notion of Europe not from a West–East perspective but from a more complex geographical and conceptual vantage point, including the North and the South in relation to the West and East and, more specifically, from the point of view of theG reek Orthodox and Russian worlds in the post- Napoleonic era. Following the political, religious and intellectual activity of two expatriates and close friends, Alexander Sturdza and Konstantinos Oikonomos, it explores how the idea of Europe was visited and how these two intellectuals and politicians negotiated and renegotiated to what extent their respective communities (Russian and Greek) were part of Europe, with religion as the central axis and the notions of the Orthodox world and Orthodox East in the arsenal of both. The first decades of the nineteenth century brought Russia and the Greeks to the forefront of the European scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School July 2020 Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789 Stephen Michael Wolfe Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political History Commons, Political Theory Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wolfe, Stephen Michael, "Protestant Experience and Continuity of Political Thought in Early America, 1630-1789" (2020). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 5344. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/5344 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PROTESTANT EXPERIENCE AND CONTINUITY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT IN EARLY AMERICA, 1630-1789 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Stephen Michael Wolfe B.S., United States Military Academy (West Point), 2008 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2016, 2018 August 2020 Acknowledgements I owe my interest in politics to my father, who over the years, beginning when I was young, talked with me for countless hours about American politics, usually while driving to one of our outdoor adventures. He has relentlessly inspired, encouraged, and supported me in my various endeavors, from attending West Point to completing graduate school.
    [Show full text]
  • Justifying Religious Freedom: the Western Tradition
    Justifying Religious Freedom: The Western Tradition E. Gregory Wallace* Table of Contents I. THESIS: REDISCOVERING THE RELIGIOUS JUSTIFICATIONS FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.......................................................... 488 II. THE ORIGINS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN EARLY CHRISTIAN THOUGHT ................................................................................... 495 A. Early Christian Views on Religious Toleration and Freedom.............................................................................. 495 1. Early Christian Teaching on Church and State............. 496 2. Persecution in the Early Roman Empire....................... 499 3. Tertullian’s Call for Religious Freedom ....................... 502 B. Christianity and Religious Freedom in the Constantinian Empire ................................................................................ 504 C. The Rise of Intolerance in Christendom ............................. 510 1. The Beginnings of Christian Intolerance ...................... 510 2. The Causes of Christian Intolerance ............................. 512 D. Opposition to State Persecution in Early Christendom...... 516 E. Augustine’s Theory of Persecution..................................... 518 F. Church-State Boundaries in Early Christendom................ 526 G. Emerging Principles of Religious Freedom........................ 528 III. THE PRESERVATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN MEDIEVAL AND REFORMATION EUROPE...................................................... 530 A. Persecution and Opposition in the Medieval
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Krans, Beyond What Is Written: Erasmus and Beza As Conjectural Critics of the New Testament
    124 Reviews / ERSY 29 (2009) 103–143 Jan Krans, Beyond What Is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. New Testament Tools and Studies 35 (Leiden: Brill, 2006). viii, 384 pp. ISBN 978-90-04-15286-1. Jan Krans’ book is a reworking of his 2004 doctoral thesis, completed under the supervision of Professor Martin de Boer at the Faculty of Theology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. A specialist in New Testament exegesis, Krans offers a careful study of how Erasmus and Theodore Beza worked to produce their critical editions of the sacred text. Of great importance for Krans’ study is an analysis of the textual conjectures in their exegesis of the New Testament. The appeal of this approach, of interest not only to biblical scholars but also to those studying humanism, is that it illuminates Erasmus’ and Beza’s methodologies. Above all, Krans is interested in the grounds on which these scholars chose their proposed readings. Indeed, looking beyond the received text and the conjectures, too often studied in and for themselves, Krans seeks to study the hermeneutical foundations of the texts and the conditions under which they were produced. The choice of Erasmus and Beza are natural ones, as both are foundational to modern editions of the New Testament. Consequently, Krans is not only interested in their treatment of the Greek text but in the entirety of their biblical work. As the author underlines in the introduction and epilogue, “judgement of conjectures should be preceded by knowledge of their authors” (333). The first section (7–191) is dedicated to the work of Erasmus.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Beza on Prophets and Prophecy. in Beza at 500: New Perspectives on an Old Reformer Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Göttingen)
    Balserak, J. (2020). Theodore Beza on Prophets and Prophecy. In Beza at 500: New Perspectives on an Old Reformer Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Göttingen). Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage at [insert hyperlink] . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ 1 Theodore Beza on Prophets and Prophecy Jon Balserak University of Bristol On August 19, 1564, Theodore Beza described the scene following Jean Calvin’s death a few months earlier: “the following night and the day after as well, there was much weeping in the city. For the body of the city mourned the prophet of the Lord” (CO 21: 45-6). This is not the only time Beza referred to Calvin as a prophet. In his vita Calvini, Beza wrote: “Calvin in the dedication of his Lectures on the prophet Daniel to the French churches declares, in a prophetic voice, that tempestuous and severe trials were hanging over their heads” (CO 21: 91).1 Study of prophets and prophecy in the medieval and reformation eras is hardly new. A myriad number of people—Birgitta of Sweden (Fogelqvist: 1993), Joachim of Fiore (Reeves: 1969; McGinn: 1985), Girolamo Savanarola (Herzig: 2008), Jan Hus (Oberman: 1999, 135- 67; Haberkern: 2016), Martin Luther (Preuss: 1933; Kolb: 1999; Oberman: 1999, 135-67), Ulrich Zwingli (Büsser: 1950, Opitz: 2007, 2: 493-513; Opitz: 2017), Heinrich Bullinger 1 Beza left Lausanne for Geneva in November 1558, see “Le départ de Bèze et son remplacement” (see Beza: 1962, II, Annexe XIV).
    [Show full text]
  • Calvin, Beza, and Amyraut on the Extent of the Atonement
    CALVIN, BEZA, AND AMYRAUT ON THE EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT by Matthew S. Harding Ph.D. (Cand.) Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2013 D. Min. New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 2009 M. Ed. University of Arkansas, 2008 M.Div. Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1999 B.A. University of Tennessee, 1995 November 29, 2012 CALVIN, BEZA, AND AMYRAUT ON THE EXTENT OF THE ATONEMENT Introduction The question of the extent of Christ’s atonement in John Calvin’s theology, whether he embraced a universalist or particularist understanding, continues to be a perennial debate within contemporary historical theology. Closely linked, the question whether the tradition that bears Calvin’s name today within Reformed theology is the harmless by-product of natural progression and development from Calvin’s seminal thoughts or a gross misrepresentation of a philosophical system that has clearly departed from Calvin’s theological method, also continues to be contested within evangelical academia. The late Brian G. Armstrong, who in his own right reignited the debate in the 1960s concerning the possible departure of the Reformed tradition from Calvin’s theology, essentially pleads in his work, Calvinism and the Amyraut Heresy, for more aggressive Calvin research into the claims and theology of seventeenth century humanist, Moïse Amyraut, who claimed to represent Calvin’s purest theology as opposed to the new orthodox tradition.1 In his penultimate scholarly endeavor, Armstrong contends that 1In Armstrong’s main text, he worked off the initial thesis by Basil Hall (1965) that Orthodox Reformed Theology of the 18th century to present had indeed departed from the more faithful understanding of Calvin’s soteriology, especially concerning the nature of the atonement.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographie Der Schweizergeschichte Bibliographie De L'histoire Suisse Bibliografìa Della Storia Svizzera 2003
    Bibliographie der Schweizergeschichte Bibliographie de l’histoire suisse Bibliograf ìa della storia svizzera 2003 Herausgegeben von der Schweizerischen Landesbibliothek, Bern Publiée par la Bibliothèque nationale suisse, Berne Bibliographie der Schweizergeschichte Bibliographie de l’histoire suisse 2003 l’histoire de Bibliographie Schweizergeschichte der Bibliographie Pubblicata dalla Biblioteca nazionale svizzera, Berna Bibliographie der Schweizergeschichte Bibliographie de l’histoire suisse Bibliograf ìa della storia svizzera 2003 Herausgegeben von der Schweizerischen Landesbibliothek, Bern Publiée par la Bibliothèque nationale suisse, Berne Pubblicata dalla Biblioteca nazionale svizzera, Berna 2006 ISSN 0378-4584 Redaktion / Pierre Louis Surchat Rédaction / Schweizerische Landesbibliothek / Bibliothèque nationale suisse Redazione: Hallwylstrasse 15 3003 CH-Bern E-Mail: [email protected] online: www.snl.ch/biblio Vertrieb: BBL, Vertrieb Publikationen, 3003 CH-Bern Telefax 031 325 50 58 E-Mail [email protected] Internet www.bbl.admin.ch/bundespublikationen Diffusion / Diffusione: OFCL, Diffusion publications, 3003 CH-Berne Fax 031 325 50 58 E-Mail [email protected] Internet www.bbl.admin.ch/bundespublikationen Art. Nr. 304.545.d.f.i 10.06 500 157876 III Bemerkungen des Herausgebers Die seit 1913 regelmässig erscheinende Bibliographie der Schweizergeschichte erfasst die im In und Ausland erschienen Publikationen (Monographien, Sammelschriften, Zeitschriftenartikel und Lizenziatsarbeiten auf allen Arten von
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Abuse of John Calvin in Richard Hooker's
    Perichoresis Volume 10. Issue 1 (2012): 3-22 DOI 10.2478/v10297-012-0001-9 THE USE AND ABUSE OF JOHN CALVIN IN RICHARD HOOKER’S DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH CHURCH * DAVID NEELANDS Trinity College, University of Toronto ABSTRACT. At times Richard Hooker (1554-1600), as an apologist for the Church of England, has been treated as “on the Calvinist side”, at others as an “anti-Calvinist”. In fact, Hooker and his Church were dependent on John Calvin in some ways and independent in others. Hooker used recognized sources to paint a picture of Calvin and his reforms in Geneva that would negatively characterize the proposals and behaviour of those he opposed in the Church of England, and yet he adopted Calvinist positions on several topics. A judicious treatment of Hooker’s attitude to John Calvin requires careful reading, and an understanding of the polem- ical use of the portrait of Calvin. Calvin was indeed grave and learned, but he was human and, as an authority, inferior to the Church Fathers, who were formally recognized as authorities in the Church of England. KEY WORDS: Richard Hooker, Calvin, Calvinism, sanctification, internal witness of the Holy Spirit, predestination, Presbyterian system Introduction Although Calvin has, since the eighteenth century, frequently been inter- preted as the theological genius behind the Church of England’s theological position, especially expressed in the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (1563, 1571), such a conclusion is historically inaccurate. Voices of the Continental Reformation were indeed profoundly important in the development of offi- cially-approved English doctrinal and disciplinary standards, but Calvin’s voice itself came relatively late in the process, which was well under way by the mid 1530s and before Calvin had published the first edition of the Insti- tutes .
    [Show full text]
  • The Logikē Latreia of Romans 12: 1 and Its Interpretation Among Christian Humanists
    Perichoresis Volume 15. Issue 1 (2017): 47-66 DOI: 10.1515/perc-2017-0003 THE LOGIKĒ LATREIA OF ROMANS 12: 1 AND ITS INTERPRETATION AMONG CHRISTIAN HUMANISTS * KIRK M. SUMMERS University of Illinois ABSTRACT. Scholars have debated whether the sentiment of sixteenth century reformers against material forms of worship derived from certain Neo-Platonic ideas proliferating in parts of Europe and disseminated by Erasmus or from strictly Scriptural principles that were initially formulated by the Old Testament prophets and given fuller expression in the New. This essay studies the reformers ’ interpretation of the phrase logikē latreia at Romans 12:1, as well as other key passages. It concludes that, whether consciously or subconsciously, the re- formers borrowed language concerning the material-spiritual dichotomy of worship, not di- rectly from Neo-Platonists, but from a commonplace used by numerous Roman writers. Early Church Fathers had long ago turned the same commonplace against pagan rivals, but now the reformers were employing it against the Catholic Church itself. KEY WORDS: worship, Romans 12:1, Erasmus, Calvin, Neo-Platonism Introduction: The Spiritual-Material Dichotomy One of the major features of the Reformation movement in the sixteenth century was the criticism of materialism in Catholic worship and a corre- sponding call for the spiritualization of piety. Scholars have long debated the antecedents of this anti-materialistic rhetoric among the reformers along with its corresponding focus on inner, spiritual worship. Two oppos- ing views on the matter are set forth by Carlos Eire in his book, War against the Idols . The Reformation of Worship from Erasmus to Calvin , and by Philip Butin in his article, ‘ John Calvin ’s Humanist Image of Popular Late- Medieval Piety and Its C ontribution to Reformed Worship’ (Eire 1986; Butin 1994), which presents itself as a critique of Eire ’s thesis, particularly as it pertains to John Calvin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right of Magistrates
    < 1 > The Right of Magistrates Concerning the Rights of Rulers Over Their Subjects and the Duty Of Subjects Towards Their Rulers. A brief and clear treatise particularly indispensable to either class in these troubled times. By Theodore Beza Translation by Henry-Louis Gonin, edited by Patrick S. Poole Notes from the critical French Edition translated by Patrick S. Poole To Kings and Princes the Counsel of David: Psalm 2: Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for His wrath will soon be kindled. To the Subjects: I Peter 2:13: Be subjects to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake. Contents: Question 1. Must Magistrates Always Be Obeyed As Unconditionally As God? Question 2. Is A Magistrate Held Responsible To Render Account Of All His Laws To His Subjects? And How Far Are They To Presume Such Laws To Be Just? Question 3. How Far Must Obedience Be Rendered Or Refused To Unjust Or Impious Commands? Question 4. How Can One Who Has Suffered Wrong At The Hands Of A Ruler Defend Himself Against Him? Chapter 5. Whether Manifest Tyrants Can Lawfully Be Checked By Armed Force. Question 6. What is the duty of subjects towards their superiors who have fallen into tyranny? Question 7. What must be done when the Orders or Estates cannot be summoned to impede or to check tyranny? Question 8. What may be done against unjust oppressors? Question 9. Whether subjects can contract with their rulers? Question 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    1 Introduction ‘Theodore Beza? Who’s he? Why should I care about him?’ I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been asked that question over the years. Ever since I first ran across him in my doctoral studies some fifteen years ago and developed some interest in him, that’s what I’ve heard from people time and time again. (Or at least that’s the way I’ve interpreted many a quizzical look when his name comes up.) That’s a shame. Everyone knows something about Martin Luther (he nailed up the ninety-five theses and said some mean things about Jews) and John Calvin (he stressed predestination and burned a heretic in Geneva). Beyond that, they know some facts about Augustine of Hippo (he was embarrassed about sex) and Jonathan Edwards (he preached a sermon saying that God holds us over the pit of hell like a spider dangling on a string). And of course they’re aware of Billy Graham and his role in evangelicalism in the twentieth century. But, Theodore Beza?, you ask, Who’s he? Well, I’m glad you asked. I’m taking the opportunity in the book to answer that question. In just a short period of time, you should be able to say a few things about this man who in his day was one of the luminaries of the Protestant world, who took the reins of the beleaguered Calvinistic movement after its namesake’s death, and who influenced English-speaking Protestantism more than you might imagine. He may not have been a giant like Calvin, but he was certainly bigger than most of us are.
    [Show full text]