DOCSLIB.ORG

Talmud with Power of Shame Sample

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Talmud with Power of Shame Sample ISBN-10 1–891662–87-2 ISBN-12 9781891662874 Copyright © 2007 Joel Lurie Grishaver Photo credits: Page 1 © Jerzy Kolacz/The Image Bank; page 9 © Sanford/Agliolo/CORBIS; page 12 © Archivo Iconografico, S.A./CORBIS; page 18 © Stephen Schildbach; page 23 © Image.com/CORBIS; page 25 © Royalty-Free/ CORBIS; page 32 © Joe Baker; page 38 © Richard T. Nowitz/CORBIS; page 50 © Image: © Royalty-Free/Corbis. Published by Torah Aura Productions. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Torah Aura Productions, 4423 Fruitland Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90058 (800) BE–TORAH • (800) 238–6724 • (323) 585–7312 • fax (323) 585–0327 Website WWW.TORAHAURA.COM MANUfactURED IN THE UNITED states OF AMERICA Table of Contents How to Use this Book .......................................4 Embarrassing Cases (A Warm-Up) . .............................6 The Introduction . ..........................................8 The Mishnah: Bava Metzia 4.10 ................................ 9 The Gemara: Bava Metzia 58b-59a (Act 1) . ...................... 11 Intermission: Threading the Gemara . ...........................30 Hevruta Text 1: Kamza and Bar Kamza Gittin 55b . ................32 Hevruta Text 2: The Meanings of Shame (Orhot Tzaddikim) . ......... 35 The Gemara: Bava Metzia 59a-59b (Act 2) . ......................38 The Epilogue . ............................................45 The Origins of the Excommunication of Rabbi Eliezer . ..............48 Mishnah: Brakhot 4.1 ....................................... 49 Rabban Gamliel vs. Rabbi Yehoshua: Brakhot 27b-28a .............. 50 The Answers to Embarrassing Cases . ...........................60 The Real World . ..........................................64 How to Use this Book Flip through this book and you will find a collection of pieces, much more than just the Mishnah and Gemara (the two parts of the Talmud) that are advertised on the cover . The parts and the pieces can be used in a number of different orders and in a number of different ways . Embarrassing Cases (A Warm-Up) (pages 5-6) is a set of legal cases that involve balancing embarrassment against other issues . When can we allow a person to choose to embarrass him/her self? To what degree can we embarrass people in order to help them change their behavior? What do we do in cases where our discomfort leads to the embarrassment of another person (and more)? These cases help to frame the issues and suggest future applications of the passages we will study . Like your old high school textbooks, The Answers to Embarrassing Cases can be found in the back (page 60 ff) . Feel free to look at these Rabbinic solutions after you have struggled with and discussed the cases . The Introduction (page 8) sets the context of our passage in the Talmud and sets the context for the discussion that begins on page 9 . The Mishnah (pages 9-10) is the first historical layer of the Talmud . It was written in the Land of Israel by Rabbis who were called Tanna’im . This happened between 160 B .C .E . and 210 C .E . The Mishnah (now know as “our Mishnah”) takes the discussion the Talmud has been having on ONA’AH (fraud) and moves it into a new area, ONA’AT DIBBUR (Fraud with Words) . It attempts to define this concept . The Gemara (pages 11-29) is the next historical layer of the Talmud . Written in Babylonia by a group of Rabbis called Amora’im, the Gemara was created between 200 and 500 C .E . The Tanna’im were part-time Rabbis who did other things and met either in the late afternoon or during breaks between harvests . The Amora’im were full-time Rabbis who were part of full-time Academies, Yeshivot . The Mishnah was their curriculum and they explored it, looking into the motivation for the laws it taught and into new applications of these laws . This Gemara explores ways in which words can shame others . Only the first half of the Gemara is present in this section . Then we take a break . On pages 30 and 31 is a section called Threading the Gemara . This is a presentation of the structure of how the Gemara was assembled and how this jumble of tangents actually form a logical progression . This is a good way to 4 review the first half of the Gemara and anticipate the second half . Feel free to return to these pages when you have completed the sugia . A sugia = One Mishnah plus all the Gemara that discusses it . It is one conversation . Two Hevruta Texts. Hevruta is an Aramaic word that means “the friendship group ”. It is a classic way of studying . First you study a text with a friend, the two of you having a deep and personal conversation about it . Then you share your insights with the whole class and your teacher, explicating this text further . These two texts—Kamza and Bar Kamza, a Talmudic story; and a selection from Orhot Tzaddikim, a medieval (or Renaissance) text on ethics— are ways of expanding our focus on the impact of shame . They can be used at the beginning of every class session as a warm-up . They can be used as a one or two week break in the study of the Gemara . They can be skipped (and left for home reading) if timing is tight . The Gemara continues (pages 38-48) with one of the most famous stories in the Talmud, the story of Akhnai’s stove . This argument deals with shame and its implication in other ways . After “our sugia” is finished we have included another Talmudic story that we have called: The Origins of the Excommunication of Rabbi Eliezer . Here is a story whose focus is both the power of shame and the power of an apology . One of its key characters is Rabban Gamliel II, who is the persecutor in “our sugia” and also one of the victims . This earlier story defines his character and also teaches about shame and the power of an apology . This story could be studied as an introduction to our Talmudic passage or left as we have done as an epilogue . 5 Embarrassing Cases (A Warm-Up) To get “warmed-up” for our Talmudic passage we are going to start with six cases that involve issues of embarrassment and shame . Judaism is against shaming anyone . (No surprise!) But each of these cases involves deciding if the mitigating circumstances are severe or significant enough to allow (or require) some embarrassment . They will get us ready for our sugia (Talmudic dialogue) and its implications . Working with your fellow students, find the best “verdict” for each situation . The Ethics of Dwarf Tossing A dwarf goes to his rabbi and asks if he can take part in a dwarf tossing game in a local bar . In the game the dwarf wears a harness and people take turns throwing him as far as they can . The dwarves are thrown onto gym mats, and they readily volunteer because they are paid well . They even get a medical benefits package . Our dwarf asks his rabbi: “If the danger is minimal and I agree to take part, is there anything wrong with such an activity?” Rabbi Israel Salanter Responds Once while on a lecture tour, the nineteenth century Rabbi Israel Salanter accepted an invitation for dinner on Shabbat . When he and his host were about to sit down for the meal, the man grew angry at his wife for forgetting to cover the two hallot . The woman was ashamed in the presence of such a distinguished guest and ran off to the kitchen where there she remained . In that situation, what should Rabbi Salanter do? Rabbi Salanter was a mussar master . Mussar is the Jewish discipline of studying ethical behavior . What do you think he did? Twin “Nic-o-teens” In Wisconsin, a pair of twin boys, Bradley and Gavin, started smoking when they were twelve . Now they are sixteen and their mother has tried everything to get them to stop . Finally, she goes for a neighbor’s suggestion . She puts up “wanted posters” of them at every gas station and convenience store around town—telling people not to buy cigarettes for them and to call the police if they see them smoking . They had regularly gotten their “smokes” by getting people of legal age to do the buying for them . The boys go to court to stop their mother from doing this . Does a mother have the right to publicly embarrass her sons this way? Is she doing the right or the wrong thing here? 6 Can “Sludge” Be a Sign of Friendship? When David was eight or nine the other campers used to call him “Sludge ”. It was an insult tied to his inability to keep his things in order . Now he’s fourteen, and some of his friends have started using it again . They think it is an act of friendship—he thinks it still hurts . What should Sean, the one friend to whom David told the whole story, do about it? Synagogue Exposé Matt is president of the synagogue . Sandy edits the synagogue newsletter . Sandy hates the way Matt is running the shul . She thinks that he is picking all his friends for the important positions rather than choosing the best people . Sandy writes a nasty editorial criticizing Matt for the way he is doing his job . Matt goes to the rabbi and says that the newsletter should not be sent out because it is un-Jewish to embarrass a person . Sandy says that social criticism is a Jewish way of life . What should the rabbi do? Facing Ugliness Each day, on their way to work, Danny and his friend Ari pass a truly ugly, deformed man, who sits on the street and sells pens and pencils .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A USER's MANUAL Part 1: How Is Halakhah Organized?
    TORAHLEADERSHIP.ORG RABBI ARYEH KLAPPER HALAKHAH: A USER’S MANUAL Part 1: How is Halakhah Organized? I. How is Halakhah Organized? 4 case studies a. Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, and gemara thereupon b. Support of the poor Peiah, Bava Batra, Matnot Aniyyim, Yoreh Deah) c. Conversion ?, Yevamot, Issurei Biah, Yoreh Deah) d. Mourning Moed Qattan, Shoftim, Yoreh Deiah) Mishnah Berakhot 1:1 From what time may one recite the Shema in the evening? From the hour that the kohanim enter to eat their terumah Until the end of the first watch, in the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer. The Sages say: Until midnight. Rabban Gamliel says: Until morning. It happened that his sons came from a wedding feast. They said to him: We have not yet recited the Shema. He said to them: If it has not yet morned, you are obligated to recite it. Babylonian Talmud Berakhot 2a What is the context of the Mishnah’s opening “From when”? Also, why does it teach about the evening first, rather than about the morning? The context is Scripture saying “when you lie down and when you arise” (Devarim 6:7, 11:9). what the Mishnah intends is: “The time of the Shema of lying-down – when is it?” Alternatively: The context is Creation, as Scripture writes “There was evening and there was morning”. Mishnah Berakhot 1:1 (continued) Not only this – rather, everything about which the Sages say until midnight – their mitzvah is until morning. The burning of fats and organs – their mitzvah is until morning. All sacrifices that must be eaten in a day – their mitzvah is until morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing the Talmud: the Origins of the Printed Talmudic Page
    Marvin J. Heller The author has published Printing the Talmud: A History of the Earliest Printed Editions of the Talmud. DESIGNING THE TALMUD: THE ORIGINS OF THE PRINTED TALMUDIC PAGE non-biblical Jewish work,i Its redaction was completed at the The Talmudbeginning is indisputablyof the fifth century the most and the important most important and influential commen- taries were written in the middle ages. Studied without interruption for a milennium and a half, it is surprising just how significant an eftèct the invention of printing, a relatively late occurrence, had upon the Talmud. The ramifications of Gutenberg's invention are well known. One of the consequences not foreseen by the early practitioners of the "Holy Work" and commonly associated with the Industrial Revolution, was the introduction of standardization. The spread of printing meant that distinct scribal styles became generic fonts, erratic spellngs became uni- form and sequential numbering of pages became standard. The first printed books (incunabula) were typeset copies of manu- scripts, lacking pagination and often not uniform. As a result, incunabu- la share many characteristics with manuscripts, such as leaving a blank space for the first letter or word to be embellshed with an ornamental woodcut, a colophon at the end of the work rather than a title page, and the use of signatures but no pagination.2 The Gutenberg Bibles, for example, were printed with blank spaces to be completed by calligra- phers, accounting for the varying appearance of the surviving Bibles. Hebrew books, too, shared many features with manuscripts; A. M. Habermann writes that "Conats type-faces were cast after his own handwriting, .
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Rights in the Jewish Tradition
    LABOR RIGHTS IN THE JEWISH TRADITION Michael S. Perry Jewish Labor Committee □ 25 East 21 st Street □ New York, NY 10010 □ www.jewishlabor.org Michael S. Perry is Executive Director of the Jewish Labor Committee. © Jewish Labor Committee, 1993 2 Labor Rights in the Jewish Tradition I. Introduction The Jewish community in the United ory of an earlier period of mass Jewish im- ments relating to the hiring of workers are States has been supportive of worker and migration to the United States, when an imbued with respect for labor rights, and trade union rights for many years, even as it overwhelmingly immigrant community some Jewish religious laws anticipate cur- evolved from a predominantly working-class toiled in difficult and often desperate condi- rent secular labor law by thousands of community in the first part of the 20th cen- tions in the garment industry and other years. The following is a description of tury to a predominantly professional and trades. This support is also consistent with labor rights found in Jewish religious entrepreneurial-class community today. This Jewish religious law (“Halacha”). Both in sources and an analysis of current industrial support stems in part from a collective mem- spirit and in practice, religious command- relations issues in light of this tradition. II. Judaism and the Dignity of Labor Respect for the dignity of labor has The Talmudic ideal of work stood in This recognition of absolute Divine been an important theme in Jewish reli- sharp contrast to other views prevailing in ownership and of limited temporary gious writings for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadran for Seder Nezikin with the Help of God Hadran for Seder Nezikin
    Hadran for Seder Nezikin With the help of God Hadran for Seder Nezikin Based on an Oral Tradition Rebbe Nachman once said, "The world labors under the misconception that a tzaddik cannot make a mistake. I say this is not so. A tzaddik can make a mistake. The mistake remains a mistake and the tzaddik remains tzaddik." It is customary upon completion of learning a tractate of Talmud, or a seder (order) of Mishnah, to give a hadran to mark the occasion. (See below for a definition of hadran.) Having been blessed with the privilege of completing Seder Nezikin, I offer the following. Seder Nezikin, the fourth of the six orders of Mishnah, deals with Jewish jurisprudence. Tort law, property law, estate law, courts and justices, testimony, rendering decisions, administering sentences and ethics are some of the topics covered. The closing tractate, Horiyot, deals with the topic of rectifying judicial mistakes made by the king, the kohein gadol (high priest) or even of the entire Sanhedrin. Yes. Even the most learned of scholars, people of the most refined character and of genuine spirituality - 100% dyed-in-the-wool tzaddikim - can make mistakes. Not only simple, personal mistakes, but even mistakes that affect the entire Jewish people, even mistakes of heresy (1:5). The mistakes remain mistakes and they remain tzaddikim. It's not the end of the world. A mistake can be forgiven. We learn in Horiyot that the mistakes of the king, kohein gadol and Sanhedrin were forgiven and rectified by offering a sacrifice in the Beit Hamikdash (Temple).
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Ditty Pesachim 78: Korban Pesach Today (?)
    Daf Ditty Pesachim 78: Korban Pesach today (?) Three girls in Israel were detained by the Israeli Police (2018). The girls are activists of the “Return to the Mount” (Chozrim Lahar) movement. Why were they detained? They had posted Arabic signs in the Muslim Quarter calling upon Muslims to leave the Temple Mount area until Friday night, in order to allow Jews to bring the Korban Pesach. This is the fourth time that activists of the movement will come to the Old City on Erev Pesach with goats that they plan to bring as the Korban Pesach. There is also an organization called the Temple Institute that actively is trying to bring back the Korban Pesach. It is, of course, very controversial and the issues lie at the heart of one of the most fascinating halachic debates in the past two centuries. 1 The previous mishnah was concerned with the offering of the paschal lamb when the people who were to slaughter it and/or eat it were in a state of ritual impurity. Our present mishnah is concerned with a paschal lamb which itself becomes ritually impure. Such a lamb may not be eaten. (However, we learned incidentally in our study of 5:3 that the blood that gushed from the lamb's throat at the moment of slaughter was collected in a bowl by an attendant priest and passed down the line so that it could be sprinkled on the altar). Our mishnah states that if the carcass became ritually defiled, even if the internal organs that were to be burned on the altar were intact and usable the animal was an invalid sacrifice, it could not be served at the Seder and the blood should not be sprinkled.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Testimony and Talmudic Reasoning
    Kedma: Penn's Journal on Jewish Thought, Jewish Culture, and Israel Volume 2 Number 2 Fall 2018 Article 8 2020 Women’s Testimony and Talmudic Reasoning Deena Kopyto University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/kedma Part of the Jewish Studies Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/kedma/vol2/iss2/8 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Women’s Testimony and Talmudic Reasoning Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Kedma: Penn's Journal on Jewish Thought, Jewish Culture, and Israel: https://repository.upenn.edu/kedma/vol2/iss2/8 Women’s Testimony and Talmudic Reasoning Deena Kopyto Introduction Today, being a witness is often considered a burden – an obligation that courts force people to fulfill. In contrast, in Talmudic-era Babylonia and ancient Israel, testifying was a privilege that certain groups, including slaves, women, and children, did not enjoy. While minors should be barred from participating in courts, and still largely are today, the status of women in Talmudic courts poses a much trickier question. Through this historical and Talmudic analysis, I aim to determine the root of this ban. The reasons for the ineligibility of female testimony range far and wide, but most are not explicitly mentioned in the Talmud. Perhaps women in Talmudic times were infrequently called as witnesses, and rabbis banned women from participation in courts in order to further crystallize this patriarchal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections and Table Activities for Yamim Noraim
    SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE Reflections and Table Activities for Yamim Noraim By Noam Zion Contents Copyright © 2008 Shalom Hartman Institute, Jerusalem, Israel hartman.org.il | [email protected] Reflections and Table Activities for Yamim Noraim By Noam Zion Table of Contents A. Rosh HaShana: A Time of Critical Self-Reflection Page 3 B. Seder Rosh HaShanah: Symbolic Foods and New Year’s Wishes Page 9 C. L’Shanah Tova Cards – Wishing Others Well Page 13 D. Tashlich Page 16 E. Yom Kippur: Personal Selichot: A Moment of Reconciliation with Our Families and Friends Page 17 F. Reviewing the Rules for Fasting and Eating on Yom Kippur Page 18 G. Kapparot and Scapegoats – Exchanging Coins for Chickens Page 24 H. Kol Nidrei – Canceling Promises Page 26 Contents Copyright © 2008 Shalom Hartman Institute, Jerusalem, Israel 2 hartman.org.il | [email protected] A. Rosh HaShana: A Time of Critical Self-Reflection Rabbi Marshall Meyer (activist for human rights in Argentina under the antisemitic, repressive government of the 1970’s) 1 “Rosh HaShanah initiates the Aseret Yimei Teshuvah commonly translated as the ‘Ten Days of Repentance.’ I would like to suggest that for these days to have a new dimension of meaning we translate them as the ‘Ten Days of Searching, Twisting and Turning,’ of wrestling with our souls and trying desperately to find new meaning to our existence.” Hannah Senesh’s Diary- October 11, 1940 (young Hungarian kibbutznik who volunteered as a Jewish paratrooper and spy for the British Army and the Hagana to drop behind Nazi lines in Hungary,
    [Show full text]
  • Guardianship for Orphans in Talmudic Law
    Guardianship for Orphans in Talmudic law AMIHAI RADZYNER ABSTRACT The article reviews the Talmudic institution of guardianship for orphans, as it appears in sources from Palestine and Babylon, mostly from the second to the fifth centuries CE. It is likely that the foundations of this institution are found in foreign law, but after it was absorbed in Jewish law, it began to build an independent life, and was not necessarily affected by its legal system of origin. The design of the institution was mainly conducted by the Jewish sages of the second-century (Tannaim). The Mishnah and Tosefta are already showing a fairly well-developed system of guardianship laws. This system was not changed substantially afterward, and the later Talmudic sages (Amoraim) continued to develop the institution upon the foundation created by their pre- decessors. The Talmudic sources present a fairly well-developed institution, from its creation through the duties of the guardian during his tenure to the end of the guardianship term. 245 INTRODUCTION It seems that like in other instances, the Greek term for guardian – epitropos which appears many times in Talmudic literature shows us ,1('אפוטרופוס') that it involves an institution which was created in Talmudic law under the influence of Greek and Roman Law, two legal traditions that were prevalent in Palestine at the time of the creation of the institution of guardianship.2 This does not mean, at the same time that the principles of the laws of Talmudic guardianship, which I shall not discuss in this short article, are identical to those of any known Greek or Roman law.3 Within this framework I shall con- fine my analysis to Talmudic Law and its principles exclusively.
    [Show full text]
  • KS 3 Talmud Page Layout Copy
    Page Chapter name Tractate name Chapter number Ein mishpat, Ner mitzvah Rashi’s commentary –Rashi (an acronym for Rabbi (Hebrew: Well of justice, Lamp of Shlomo Yitchaki) was a major Jewish scholar active in the commandment) Compiled in 11th century France. Rashi compiled the first the 16th century this provides the complete commentary on the Talmud. The Mishnah source references to the laws are written in in a brief, terse style without being discussed on the page. punctuation and Rashi’s commentary is directed towards helping readers work through the text and understand its basic form and content. Tosafot (Hebrew: additions) These Mishnah and Gemara The central column of the page contains medieval commentaries were written in verses of the Mishnah followed by verses from the Gemara. the 12th and 13th centuries. They are the The Mishnah is the primary record of the teaching, decisions work of various Talmudic scholars and disputes of a group of Jewish religious and judicial scholars primarily living in France and Germany. known as Tannaim, active from about 10 to 220 CE. Originally transmitted orally, it was edited into its current form and written down in 200 CE by Rabbi Yehuda Hanasi. Written primarily in Hebrew, it is divided into 63 tractates and organized into six sections or ‘orders’. The Gemara is an analysis and expansion on the Mishnah. There are two versions - the Other commentaries Various other Babylonian Talmud (the most commonly studied) and the commentaries appear in the margins Jerusalem Talmud. The Gemara is written primarily in Aramaic of a printed Talmud page.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus Beth Berkowitz Jewish Theological Seminary Animals in Rabbinic
    TAL 6150 “Humans and Other Animals in Talmudic Torts” Prof. Beth Berkowitz The Jewish Theological Seminary of America Fall 2010 Monday/Wednesday 10:20-12:10 “Among nonhumans and separate from nonhumans there is an immense multiplicity of other living things that cannot in any way be homogenized, except by means of violence and willful ignorance, within the category of what is called the animal or animality in general.” Jacques Derrida “The Animal That Therefore I Am” Theme of Course Human beings have long considered themselves unique among animals. In recent decades, new research on animal cognition and the rise of the environmentalist movement have challenged the conviction that we are superior to – and have the right to exploit – other animal species. This course will explore the conceptualization of animals within classical rabbinic law. Slaughtering, sacrificing, and eating animals are the most prominent legal topics, but the Mishnah also discusses buying, selling, owning, inheriting, stealing, judging, and worshipping animals, as well as keeping them as pets, using them for labor, gambling with them, and having sex with them. Our course will focus on rabbinic laws about injury to and by animals, which is most often embodied by the “goring ox,” a legal motif inherited from the Torah (which was probably in turn borrowed from the Laws of Hammurabi). We will keep in mind the broader rabbinic discourse about animals as we ask: • According to rabbinic assumption, what is the character of animal cognition, communication, intention, emotion?
    [Show full text]
  • Gemara Succah Elementary I and II
    PREMIUMPREMIUM TORAHTORAH COLLEGECOLLEGE PROGRAMSPROGRAMSTaTa l l Gemara Succah Elementary I and II February 2019 Elementary Gemara I and II: Succah —Study Guide— In this Study Guide you will find: • Elementary Succah I: syllabus (page 4), and sample examination (page 11). • Elementary Succah II: syllabus (page 18), and sample examination (page 25). NOTE: a. Since you are required to answer in black ink, be sure to bring a black pen to your exam. b. Accustom yourself to outlining your answers on scrap paper and writing essays clearly. Illegible exams will not be graded. c. The lowest passing score on this exam is 70. You will not get credit for a score below 70, though in the case of a failed or illegible paper, you may be able to retake the exam after waiting six months. Grades for transcripts are calculated as follows: A = 90–100% B = 80–89% C = 70–79% This Study Guide is the property of TAL and MUST be returned after you take the exam. Failure to do so is an aveirah of gezel. GemaraSuccahElemIandIISPCombined-1 v02.indd © 2019 by Torah Accreditation Liaison. All Rights Reserved. Succah Elementary I and II Elementary Gemara I: Succah — Study Guide — This elementary Gemara I examination is based on the beginning of Maseches Succah, from: דף ד עמוד ב on (ושאינה גבוהה עשרה טפחים) 2a) until the two dots) דף ב עמוד א • (4b), and דף ז עמוד א 6b) through) דף ו עמוד ב on (ושאין לה שלש דפנות) from the two dots • .(on the last line גופא 7a) (until the word) In this Study Guide you will find: • The syllabus outline for the elementary Succah I examination (page 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Humor in Torah and Talmud
    Sat 3 July 2010 Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Lunch and Learn Humor in Torah and Talmud -Not general presentation on Jewish humor, just humor in Tanach and Talmud, and list below is far from exhaustive -Tanach mentions “laughter” 50 times (root: tz-cho-q) [excluding Yitzhaq] -Some commentators say humor is not intentional. -Maybe sometimes, but one cannot avoid the feeling it is. -Reason for humor not always clear. -Rabbah (4th cent. Talmudist) always began his lectures with a joke: Before starting to teach, Rabbah joked and pupils laughed. Afterwards he started seriously teaching halachah. (Talmud, Shabbat 30b) Humor in Tanach -Sarai can’t conceive, so she tells her husband Abram: I beg you, go in to my maid [Hagar]; perhaps I can obtain children through her. And Abram listened to the voice of Sarai. [Genesis 16:2] Hagar gets pregnant and becomes very impertinent towards her mistress Sarai. So a very angry Sarai goes to her husband Abram and tells him: This is all your fault! [Genesis 16:5 ] -God tells Sarah she will have a child: And Sarah laughed, saying: Shall I have pleasure when I am old? My husband is also old. And the Lord said to Abraham [who did not hear Sarah]: “Why did Sarah laugh, saying: Shall I bear a child, when I am old?” [Genesis 18:12-13] God does not report all that Sarah said for shalom bayit -- to keep peace in the family. Based on this, Talmud concludes it’s OK to tell white lies [Bava Metzia 87a]. Note: After Sarah dies Abraham marries Keturah and has six more sons.
    [Show full text]