DOCSLIB.ORG

Agaoglu Group of Companies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agaoglu Group of Companies AGAOGLU GROUP OF COMPANIES KUREKDAGI RES (15 TURBINES) AND THE ADJACENT MANASTIR-ESENKOY RES PROJECTS RES (15 TURBINES) PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL EFFECT EVALUATION REPORT AGAOGLU GROUP OF COMPANIES KUREKDAGI RES AND ADJACENT MANASTIR - ESENKOY RES PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL EFFECT EVALUATION REPORT BURSA CITY, GEMLIK COUNTY YALOVA CITY, CINARCIK COUNTY MAY- 2017 1330.th Street No: 16/16 Asagi Ovecler / Ankara Phone:(312) 472 25 08 Fax: (312) 472 31 69 Mobile: (532) 333 87 39 www.aktel1.com e-mail: [email protected] AGAOGLU GROUP OF COMPANIES KUREKDAGI RES (15 TURBINES) AND THE ADJACENT MANASTIR-ESENKOY RES PROJECTS RES (15 TURBINES) PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL EFFECT EVALUATION REPORT CONTENTS INDEX Page Number 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Specifications of the Project ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2. The Scope and the Aim of the Environmental and Social Evaluation .............................................. 3 2. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Turkish Environmental Regulations ................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1. The Enviromental Effect Evaluation Procedure in Turkey ............................................................ 6 2.1.2 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3. Waste Water ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.4. Land Pollution ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.5. The Noise ..................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.6. Waste .......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2. International Treatises which are Accepted by Turkey................................................................... 13 2.3. World Bank (B)/Internation Finance Corporation (IFC) Enviroment, Health ve Safety Guides 13 2.3.1. The Noise .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2. Air Emissions and Air Quality .................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3. Waste Water and Water Quality ................................................................................................. 16 2.3.4. The Hazardous Material ............................................................................................................... 17 2.3.5. The Waste Management .............................................................................................................. 17 3. THE DEFINITION OF THE PROJECT .......................................................................................... 18 3.1. The Reccomended Project .............................................................................................................. 18 3.2. The Aim of the Project .................................................................................................................... 19 3.3. The Development Process of the Project ........................................................................................ 20 3.4. The Location of the Project ............................................................................................................. 20 3.5. Ownership Status ............................................................................................................................ 27 3.6. The Technical Specifications of the Project ................................................................................... 27 3.7. Transportation and Access .............................................................................................................. 29 3.8. The Construction of the Project ...................................................................................................... 29 3.9. The Operation and Maintenance Period of the Project ................................................................... 31 3.10. The Decommisioning of the Project ............................................................................................. 31 3.11. The Workforce .............................................................................................................................. 32 4.2. Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 34 4.3. Land Use ......................................................................................................................................... 35 4.4. Geology ........................................................................................................................................... 36 4.5.1. Regional Geology ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.5.2. Local Geology .............................................................................................................................. 42 4.6. The Seismecity ................................................................................................................................ 47 4.7. Hydrology and Hydrogeology ........................................................................................................ 50 4.7.1. Surface Waters ............................................................................................................................. 51 4.7.2. The Springs .................................................................................................................................. 57 4.7.3. Underground Waters and Wells ................................................................................................... 59 4.9. The Fauna ....................................................................................................................................... 72 4.10. The Protected Areas ...................................................................................................................... 92 4.11. The Archaeological Sites .............................................................................................................. 94 4.12. Socio- Economical Environment .................................................................................................. 94 4.12.1. Socio- Economical Attributes of Yalova City .......................................................................... 94 4.12.2. Socio- Economical Attributes of Bursa City .............................................................................. 95 5. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................... 96 5.1.3 The Post- Operation ...................................................................................................................... 99 5.2 The Air Emissions ........................................................................................................................ 100 5.2.1 The Construction ........................................................................................................................ 100 5.2.2 The Operation ............................................................................................................................ 101 AGAOGLU GROUP OF COMPANIES KUREKDAGI RES (15 TURBINES) AND THE ADJACENT MANASTIR-ESENKOY RES PROJECTS RES (15 TURBINES) PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL EFFECT EVALUATION REPORT 5.2.3 The Post- Operation ................................................................................................................... 101 5.3 The Water Supply and the Waste Water ........................................................................................ 101 5.3.1 The Construction ........................................................................................................................ 101 5.3.2 The Operation ............................................................................................................................. 102 5.3.3 The Post- Operation ................................................................................................................... 102 5.4 The Hazardous Material ................................................................................................................ 103 5.4.1 The Construction ........................................................................................................................ 103 5.4.2 The Operation ............................................................................................................................. 103 5.4.3 The Post-Operation ..................................................................................................................... 104 5.5 Nonhazardous Wastes ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 YILI FAALİYET RAPORU.Pdf
    SAKARYA İL TARIM ve ORMAN MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ 2018 YILI FAALİYET ÖZETİ SAKARYA ARALIK-2018 1 SAKARYA İL TARIM VE ORMAN MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ İl ve İlçe Müdürlükleri Personel Durumu Sakarya İl Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğü 1 İl Müdürü, 3 İl Müdür Yardımcısı, 8 Şube Müdürü, 16 İlçe Müdürü yönetiminde toplam 516 personelle hizmetlerini yürütmektedir. Su Ürünleri SAKARYA İL TARIM VE ORMAN Ziraat Vet.Sağ. Ziraat Mühendisi Gıda Mühendisi Müh.- Balıkçılık Veteriner Hekim Teknis/Tekn. Tekns/Tekn. MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ Tek.Müh. Norm 4/A 4/B Norm 4/A 4/B Norm 4/A Norm 4/A 4/B Norm 4/A Norm 4/A ARAZİ TOP. VE TARIM.ALT YAPI ŞB.MD. 14 9 1 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 3 2 - 0 ÇAYIR, MERA VE YEM BİT.ŞB. 3 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 BİTKİSEL ÜRETİM VE SAĞ.ŞB.MD. 26 13 2 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 5 3 - 0 HAYVAN SAĞLIĞI YETİŞ.ŞB.MD. 4 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 19 8 6 - 0 5 3 BALIKÇILIK VE SU ÜRÜNLERİ ŞB.MD. - 0 0 - 0 0 8 7 1 0 0 - 0 - 0 KOORDİNASYON VE TAR.VER.ŞB.MD. 5 6 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 5 2 - 0 KIRSAL KALKINMA VE ÖRGÜT.ŞB.MD. 16 6 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 1 0 4 2 - 0 GIDA VE YEM ŞB.MD. 13 1 1 31 5 5 - 0 19 7 2 - 0 - 0 İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ TOPLAMI 78 38 4 31 5 5 8 7 41 16 8 17 9 5 3 ADAPAZARI 16 8 3 6 5 1 1 0 19 11 1 6 2 4 2 AKYAZI 12 4 4 2 0 1 2 0 12 6 0 5 1 3 2 ARİFİYE 4 4 1 1 1 0 - 1 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 ERENLER 9 7 1 2 4 0 - 0 9 6 1 6 2 2 0 FERİZLİ 9 1 3 1 0 1 - 0 5 1 0 6 1 3 0 GEYVE 15 2 5 1 0 1 - 0 8 3 3 9 1 3 2 HENDEK 15 8 3 2 0 1 2 0 13 8 1 5 2 3 1 KARAPÜRÇEK 4 3 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 2 1 2 0 2 0 KARASU 19 4 3 2 1 1 3 2 9 5 2 7 1 3 2 KAYNARCA 12 6 3 - 0 0 1 1 11 5 2 7 0 3 2 KOCAALİ 18 3 4 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 1 5 1 2 2 PAMUKOVA 9 3 4 1 0 1 1 0 5 4 1 5 2 3 1 SAPANCA
    [Show full text]
  • Kurum Kodu İlçesi Kurum Adı Münhal Norm 1 731957
    Kurum Münhal İlçesi Kurum Adı Kodu Norm 1 731957 ADAPAZARI 17 Ağustos İlkokulu 1 2 731963 ADAPAZARI 21 Haziran İlkokulu 1 3 733115 ADAPAZARI Adapazarı İmam Hatip Ortaokulu 1 4 270899 ADAPAZARI Adapazarı Mesleki Eğitim Merkezi 1 5 194100 ADAPAZARI Adapazarı Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lisesi 1 6 747014 ADAPAZARI Adapazarı Özel Eğitim Anaokulu 1 7 194112 ADAPAZARI Adapazarı Prof. Dr.Tansu Çiller Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lisesi 1 8 732138 ADAPAZARI Atatürk İlkokulu 1 9 732141 ADAPAZARI Aykut Yiğit Ortaokulu 1 10 732888 ADAPAZARI Bayraktar İlkokulu 1 11 732143 ADAPAZARI Berna Yılmaz İlkokulu 1 12 732147 ADAPAZARI Budaklar İlkokulu 1 13 732156 ADAPAZARI Evrenköy İlkokulu 1 14 732158 ADAPAZARI Fatih İlkokulu 1 15 966759 ADAPAZARI Fatmana Okutan Anaokulu 1 16 964614 ADAPAZARI İMKB Mehmet Akif Ersoy Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lisesi 1 17 194089 ADAPAZARI İMKB Sakarya Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lisesi 1 18 732177 ADAPAZARI İstiklal Ortaokulu 1 19 732163 ADAPAZARI Karadere İlkokulu 1 20 732165 ADAPAZARI Karakamış İlkokulu 1 21 764413 ADAPAZARI Korucuk Anaokulu 1 22 732171 ADAPAZARI Köprübaşı İlkokulu 1 23 732175 ADAPAZARI Kurtuluş Ortaokulu 1 24 761579 ADAPAZARI Medine Müdafii Fahreddin Paşa İmam Hatip Ortaokulu 1 25 732178 ADAPAZARI Mehmet Nuri İlkokulu 1 26 751968 ADAPAZARI Mevlana İmam Hatip Ortaokulu 1 27 732238 ADAPAZARI Mithatpaşa Ortaokulu 1 28 732182 ADAPAZARI Murtaza Erdoğan İlkokulu 1 29 732205 ADAPAZARI Namık Kemal Ortaokulu 1 30 732255 ADAPAZARI Ozanlar Ortaokulu 1 31 732221 ADAPAZARI Sabihahanım Ortaokulu 1 32 732226 ADAPAZARI Sakarya
    [Show full text]
  • AN ANALYSIS of the TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UNDER STRESS University O
    SOCIO-TECHNICAL APPROACHES TO COMPLEX PHENOMENA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UNDER STRESS by Suleyman Celik B.S., Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey 1996 MPM, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 2000 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Public and International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2006 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS This thesis was presented by Suleyman Celik It was defended on June 13, 2006 and approved by Dr. Kevin Kearns, Ph.D., Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Dr. Siddharth Chandra, Ph.D., Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Dr. Toni Carbo, Ph.D., School of Information Sciences Thesis Director: Dr. Louise K. Comfort, Ph.D. ii Copyright © by Suleyman Celik 2006 iii SOCIO-TECHNICAL APPROACHES TO COMPLEX PHENOMENA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE TURKISH DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UNDER STRESS Suleyman Celik, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2006 This research analyzes and assesses the major issues regarding coordinated response operations in destructive earthquakes. The research examines the decision making process in the context of seismic risk to exemplify how public managers can utilize the information and communication systems in order to create collaborative actions in managing an extreme event. Based on the theoretical framework from Complex Adaptive Systems and Socio- technical Systems, this study is an exploratory case study that explores the factors that hinder or facilitate coordinated response operations. This research applies the theoretical framework to the two earthquake response systems, the Marmara and Duzce that occurred in Turkey in August and November of 1999, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Pore Water Geochemistry at Two Seismogenic Areas in the Sea of Marmara
    PUBLICATIONS Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems RESEARCH ARTICLE Pore water geochemistry at two seismogenic areas 10.1002/2015GC005798 in the Sea of Marmara Key Points: Livio Ruffine1, Yoan Germain1, Alina Polonia2, Alexis de Prunele1, Claire Croguennec1, Pore water geochemistry at two Jean-Pierre Donval1, Mathilde Pitel-Roudaut1, Emmanuel Ponzevera1, Jean-Claude Caprais3, seismogenic areas is discussed 3 1,4,5 6 1 2 Carbonate dissolution process has Christophe Brandily ,Celine Grall , Claire Bollinger , Louis Geli , and Luca Gasperini been identified 1 2 Link between seismic activity in IFREMER, Departement REM, Unite des Geosciences Marines, 29280 Plouzane, France, Istituto di Scienze Marine— Marmara Sea and pore water Geologia Marina, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IT-40129 Bologna, Italy, 3IFREMER, Departement REM, Unite des changes is discussed Ecosystemes et Environnements Profonds, 29280 Plouzane, France, 4CEREGE, Colle`ge de France, CNRS—Aix Marseille University, F-13545 Aix-en-Provence, France, 5Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, P.O. Box 1000, Correspondence to: Palisades, NY 10964, USA, 6Institut Universitaire Europeenne Bretagne, UBO, CNRS, UMR 6538, 29280 Plouzane, France R. Livio, livio.ruffi[email protected] Abstract Within the Sea of Marmara, the highly active North Anatolian Fault (NAF) is responsible for Citation: major earthquakes (Mw 7), and acts as a pathway for fluid migration from deep sources to the seafloor. Ruffine, L., et al. (2015), Pore water This work reports on pore water geochemistry from three sediment cores collected in the Gulfs of Izmit and geochemistry at two seismogenic areas in the Sea of Marmara, Geochem. Gemlik, along the Northern and the Middle strands of the NAF, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Funding and Citizen Support Give Birth to a Blueprint for Digital Transformation of Midsized Turkish City
    Case Study Increased Funding and Citizen Support Give Birth to a Blueprint for Digital Transformation of Midsized Turkish City With half the population of Yalova Province living in the city of the Executive Summary same name, the municipality has drawn up an ambitious e-transforma- CUSTOMER NAME tion roadmap for increased use of Information and Communications Municipality of Yalova, Turkey Technology and broadband rollout, with an e-governance model to INDUSTRY accelerate economic progress and improve citizen services. Public Sector Business Challenges BUSINESS CHALLENGES • Create job opportunities by pro- Situated on a peninsula in the Sea of Marmara, some 40 miles to the moting economic development southeast of Istanbul, Yalova has enjoyed separate administrative status through ICT from Istanbul since 1995. The province has more than 185,000 inhabit- • Improve health and education services, and build a new hospital ants, half of whom are concentrated in Yalova city. Bound by a triangle of • Become an e-government larger industrial centers, Yalova is a popular tourist destination and sees pilot city in Turkey and an EU its numbers double in summer. Other principal industries are education Knowledge Society Center of and farming, and Yalova is ranked 13 among Turkish cities by GDP. Excellence Hit hard by the 1999 earthquake, which killed 14,000 people across north- SOLUTIONS eastern Turkey and left thousands more homeless, Yalova has worked • Implement productivity monitor- ing, mobile working, and hard to restore and improve its economic fortunes. After preliminary steps performance management tools toward an e-government, Mayor Barbaros Binicioglu decided that Yalova’s • Automate health and education future depended on more substantial Information and Communications services; integrate an e-govern- Technology (ICT) investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Sakarya Büyük Tersiye
    SAKARYA VE ÇEVRESİNDEN EV ÖRNEKLERİ Dr. Yusuf ÇETİN* Özet Sakarya ve çevresi konut mimarisi konusunda zengin bir yöre olmasına rağmen bu yörenin eserleri yeterince incelenmemiştir. Osmanlı Devleti’nin kuruluşundan itibaren konumu ve verimli toprakları sayesinde göç alan bölgede, konut mimarisi konusunda Türk mimarisinin yayıldığı bir çok coğrafyadan benzer özellikler göstermektedir. Ancak bölge 1. derecede deprem kuşağında bulunduğu için sık sık depremler yaşamış ve bu depremler tarihi dokuya büyük zararlar vermiştir. Plan ve işlevsellik bakımından geleneksel konut mimarisinden ayrılmayan bölge evleri süsleme bakımından başkent İstanbul’a olan yakınlıktan dolayı özellikle XIX. yy. moda beğenisinin etkisi altında kalmıştır. Evlerde Barok, Rokoko, Ampir ve Neo-Klasik unsurlar batılılaşma dönemi Osmanlı sanatının programına uygun olarak seçmeci bir tarzda uygulanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sakarya,Osmanlı,Ev,Barok,Rokoko,Ampir,Neo-Klasik The Houses Of Sakarya Abstract Although Sakarya and its environment are very rich in terms of civil architectural buildings, these have not adequately been studied. It is found out that the civil architectural buildings in this province which was the first place for Ottoman architectural development have had a great importance during our historical journey of architecture. It is known that this province is on the 1st degree of earthquake zone. Frequent earthquakes have caused great damages to historical texture. Continuing traditional architectural housing in terms of plan and function, Sakarya houses particularly had been affected by aesthetic feeling of XIX. Century because of being near to İstanbul. Baroque, Rococo Empire and Neo-Classic style elements had selectively applied to houses parallel to Ottoman westernization art trends. Key Words: Sakarya, Ottoman, The House, Barok, Rococo, Empire, Neo- Classic style.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Earthquake Hazard Map
    Public Disclosure Authorized TURKISH ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION DIRECTORATE GENERAL Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 380 kV ÇİFTLİKKÖY GIS SS (GAS INSULATED SYSTEM SUBSTATION) Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PROVINCE OF YALOVA, ÇİFTLİKKÖY DISTRICT ANKARA – DECEMBER 2019 General Directorate of the Turkish Electricity Transmission Name of Project Owner: Corporation Nasuh Akar Mah. Türkocağı Cad No: 2 Çankaya, Address of Project Owner : Ankara Phone Number : +90 (312) 203 86 11 Fax Number : +90 (312) 203 87 17 380 kV ÇİFTLİKKÖY GIS SS (GAS INSULATED SYSTEM SUBSTATION) Name of Project ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Address of Site Selected for the Province of Yalova, Çiftlikköy District, İlyasköy Project Neighborhood i 380 kV ÇİFTLİKKÖY GIS ESMP TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No Contents i List of Tables ii List of Figures ii List of Annexes iii 1.PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Description of the Project ......................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Project ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Area............................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Technical Information on the Project ..................................................................... 7 1.5 Places with High Landscape Value,
    [Show full text]
  • Adapazari Ovasi Ve Aşaği Sakarya Platosu'nda
    T.C. SAKARYA ÜN ĐVERS ĐTES Đ SOSYAL B ĐLĐMLER ENST ĐTÜSÜ ADAPAZARI OVASI VE A ŞAĞI SAKARYA PLATOSU’NDA TARIMSAL DE ĞĐŞĐ M YÜKSEK L ĐSANS TEZ Đ Kevser ZORLU Enstitü Anabilim Dal ı : Co ğrafya Tez Dan ış man ı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ali Y ĐĞĐ T HAZ ĐRAN - 2010 BEYAN Bu tezin yaz ılmas ında bilimsel yaz ım kurallar ına uyuldu ğunu, ba şkalar ının eserlerinden yararlan ılmas ı durumunda bilimsel normlara uygun olarak at ıfta bulunuldu ğunu, kullan ılan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yap ılmad ığı nı, tezin herhangi bir k ısm ının bu üniversite veya ba şka bir üniversitedeki ba şka bir tez çal ış mas ı olarak sunulmad ığı nı beyan ederim. Kevser ZORLU 30 / 05 / 2009 ÖNSÖZ “Adapazar ı Ovas ı ve A şağı Sakarya Platosun’nda Tar ımsal De ğişim” ad ını ta şı yan bu çal ış man ın konusunu Sakarya ilinde yeti ştirilen tar ım ürünlerinde geçmi şten günümüze ya şanan de ğişim ve nedenleri olu şturmaktad ır. Çal ış man ın giri ş bölümünde ara ştırma alan ının yeri, s ınırlar ı ve özellikleri; çal ış mada kullan ılan materyal, metot ve çal ış ma alan ıyla ilgili literatür özeti yer almaktad ır. Birinci bölümde Sakarya ilinde tar ımı etkileyen do ğal ve sosyo-ekonomik faktörler; ikinci bölümde ara ştırma alan ının tar ımsal yap ısı, özellikleri ve tar ımsal üretimde ya şanan de ğişim, nedenleri ile incelenmi ştir. Lisansüstü çal ış mamda dan ış manl ığı mı üstlenip, bu tezin konusunun belirlenmesinden, tamamlanmas ına kadar geçen sürede bana yard ımlar ı ve eme ği için Say ın Hocam Yrd.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBÜ Ve Pamukova MYO Tanıtım
    7141 Sayılı Kanun çerçevesinde 18.05.2018 tarihinde kurulmuştur Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Teknoloji Fakültesi EĞİTİM MODELİ Turizm Fakültesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Ziraat Fakültesi Faaliyetleri Eğitim ÇAP YANDAL subu.edu.tr Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler EĞİTİM MODELİ Yüksekokulu Faaliyetleri Eğitim Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu ÇAP YANDAL subu.edu.tr Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Sakarya Meslek Yüksekokulu Akyazı Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Arifiye Meslek Yüksekokulu EĞİTİM MODELİ Ferizli Meslek Yüksekokulu Geyve Meslek Yüksekokulu Hendek Meslek Yüksekokulu Karasu Meslek Yüksekokulu Kaynarca Seyfettin Selim Meslek Yüksekokulu Pamukova Meslek Yüksekokulu Sapanca Turizm Meslek Yüksekokulu Sapanca Meslek Yüksekokulu Denizcilik Meslek Yüksekokulu Faaliyetleri Karapürçek Meslek Yüksekokulu* Söğütlü Meslek Yüksekokulu* Taraklı Meslek Yüksekokulu* * Kurulum aşamasındadır Eğitim ÇAP YANDAL subu.edu.tr Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Faaliyetleri Eğitim subu.edu.tr Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi EĞİTİMDE i ÜNİVERSİTE n e SANAYİ Y Ziraat Fakültesi Ulaştırma ve İŞBİRLİĞİ Lojistik Fakültesi Turizm Deniz Bilimleri Teknoloji Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Fakültesi Fakültesi Fakültesi subu.edu.tr Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Üniversitemiz, geniş ilgi alanında bilim ve teknoloji üretimine katkıda bulunmanın yanında öğrencilerimizi; değişen dünyanın ihtiyaçlarına cevap verebilen, mesleki açıdan yetkin, eleştirel
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Paper
    DISASTER MITIGATION THROUGH GIS TECHNOLOGY – APPLICATION OF GIS TOOLS TO YALOVA, A CASE STUDY E. Alarslan1, G. Kemper², O. Altan³ 1Dr.Ebru ALARSLAN, Division Chief in the Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement 2Dr.Gerhard KEMPER, CEO of GGS – Geotechnik, Geoinformatik & Service GmbH ³ Prof. Dr. Orhan ALTAN, President of the ISPRS KEY WORDS: Disaster mitigation, GIS technology and tools, earthquake risk, Yalova ABSTRACT: This paper outlines applications of GIS tools for disaster mitigation significant in urban settlements due to high urban disaster risks rather than the other areas as a result of their denser populations, constructions, and service networks. Out of various types of natural disasters, this paper focuses on earthquakes due to high seismic risk in Yalova. Yalova is located in the south-eastern coast of the Marmara Sea, a region exposed to earthquakes (Northern Anatolian Fault Zone). The Marmara region has been seismically active from 1900-2003 when 25 devastating earthquakes - including 1999 earthquakes - occurred with magnitudes ranging from 5 to 7.4. The geologic and geomorphologic features of Yalova made the settlement especially vulnerable to the tremors of the 1999 earth- quakes. It is possible to distinguish 5 groups of geological failure areas in Yalova, namely (i) areas with slope instability resulting in deep landslides, (ii) areas of deep fine alluvium and organic material likely prone to liquefaction, (iii) areas with limestone sub- formations prone to cavitations and collapse, (iv) areas with irregular weathering profiles, and (v) areas with gypsum that initiates de- formations and is hazardous to concrete foundations. With a view to the seismic features of Yalova, the application of GIS tools will be outlined in this paper and will relate to the preparation of disaster mitigation plans; the monitoring of changes in existing landuse as well as the compliance with building codes and planning standards; and the building of spatial data infrastructure that leads to sus- tainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Investigation of Toxic Element Pollution and Radioactivity Analyses of Marine Sediments in the Gulf of Gemlik (Bursa, Turkey) - 881
    Yümün et al.: The investigation of toxic element pollution and radioactivity analyses of marine sediments in the Gulf of Gemlik (Bursa, Turkey) - 881 - THE INVESTIGATION OF TOXIC ELEMENT POLLUTION AND RADIOACTIVITY ANALYSES OF MARINE SEDIMENTS IN THE GULF OF GEMLIK (BURSA, TURKEY) YÜMÜN, Z. Ü.1* – KAM, E.2 – DINÇER, A. R.1 – ÖNCE, M.1 – YÜMÜN, S.1 1Environmental Engineering Department, Çorlu Engineering Faculty, Namık Kemal University, 59860 Çorlu, Tekirdağ, Turkey (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]) 2Physics Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpaşa Campus, 34220 Esenler/İstanbul, Turkey (e-mail: [email protected]) *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 4th Sep 2020; accepted 19th Jan 2021) Abstract. In this study, the Toxic element pollution and radioactivity of marine sediments in the Gulf of Gemlik was determined. Enrichment factor (EF) and Pollution index (PI) analyses have been applied to determine toxic element pollution. According to the enrichment factor results, the EFNi in BH-1 was between 3 < EFNi < 5, and the other EF values are all below 3. In radionuclide analysis, the Ra-226 and Th-232 values were found to be below the global average value in all locations. It is estimated that the K- 40 values, which are above the world average values in the BH-1 drillings, are due to the intensive agricultural activities in that part of the study area. Cs-137 values were found to be 5.3 Bq/kg in the BH- 1/1 drilling location. This finding is very important in terms of environmental pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Based Zoning for the Coastal Area of Bursa
    ITU A|Z VOL: 10, NO:2, 51-66, 2013-2 Nature based zoning for the coastal area of Bursa Sultan GÜNDÜZ*, Gülşen GÜLER AYTAÇ** * Planlama Atölyesi, Ankara, TURKEY ** Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Landscape Architecture, Istanbul, TURKEY Received: March 2013 Final Acceptance: October 2013 Abstract: Man‟s demands on Turkey‟s coastline are increasing and this is common to coastal areas world- wide. This is because of population growth and economic development. Transport, industrial, housing, energy production and infrastructure development and tourism are transforming Turkey‟s coastal areas. Yet still these coastal areas are treated as if they are an unlimited resource. The answer is to plan development in relation to the coastal landscape‟s capacity, based on careful understanding of its character and the area‟s natural resources. Planning based on sustaining ecological integrity is a priority. This study proposes planning policies which identify different categories of zones and interaction between sub-zones. These will help define densities and location of sustainable land use development and management. In this way there can be a balance of conservation and development. The study focuses on the city of Bursa in the Sea of Marmara region because it can contribute to implementation of the 1/100000 Bursa Environmental Plan and because Bursa is the fourth largest metropolitan area of Turkey. As a result of this study the basic principles of planning and management are determined for ensuring the sustainability, and use types and densities of the region. Keywords: The balance of conservation and development, land use management, environmental management, coastal zones of interaction, sustainable landscape planning, Integrated Coastal Zone Management.
    [Show full text]