DOCSLIB.ORG

A) Marine Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A) Marine Status Status of marine and coastal natural assets in the Fitzroy Basin September 2015 Prepared by Johanna Johnson, Jon Brodie and Nicole Flint for the Fitzroy Basin Association Incorporated Version 6: 01 November 2015 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Coastal natural assets: status and trends ....................................................................................... 5 2.1. Estuaries .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Coastal wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Islands and cays .................................................................................................................... 12 3. Marine assets: status and trends .................................................................................................. 14 3.1. Coral reefs ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.2. Seagrass meadows ................................................................................................................ 21 3.3. Species of conservation interest ........................................................................................... 25 3.3.1. Dugongs .............................................................................................................................. 25 3.3.2. Cetaceans (whales and dolphins)........................................................................................ 26 3.3.3. Australian snubfin dolphins ................................................................................................ 26 3.3.4. Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins ........................................................................................ 27 3.3.5. Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin........................................................................................... 27 3.3.6. Whales ................................................................................................................................ 27 3.3.7. Reptiles ................................................................................................................................ 28 3.3.8. Flatback turtles ................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.9. Green turtles ....................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.10. Hawksbill turtles................................................................................................................ 29 3.3.11. Loggerhead turtles ............................................................................................................ 29 3.3.12. Leatherback turtles ........................................................................................................... 30 3.3.13. Olive ridley turtles ............................................................................................................. 30 3.3.14. Estuarine crocodiles .......................................................................................................... 30 3.3.15. Sea snakes ......................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.16. Sawfish .............................................................................................................................. 33 3.3.17. Seabirds ............................................................................................................................. 33 4. Pressures and threats to coastal and marine assets ..................................................................... 35 4.1. Terrestrial pollutants: declining water quality ...................................................................... 35 4.2. Crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks...................................................................................... 39 4.3. Coastal development, ports and shipping ............................................................................ 40 4.4. Extreme events: floods and cyclones .................................................................................... 41 4.5. Climate change: elevated sea temperatures ........................................................................ 46 4.6. Cumulative pressures ............................................................................................................ 47 5. Knowledge gaps and recommendations ....................................................................................... 49 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 50 7. References .................................................................................................................................... 54 List of Figures Figure 1. Map of Fitzroy Basin marine region and catchments. ............................................................. 3 Figure 2. Wetland areas of the Fitzroy Basin and coastal catchments, showing nationally important wetlands. ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3. Coastal islands of Balaclava, Curtis and Facing islands in the Fitzroy region. ........................ 12 Figure 7. Seabird nesting islands and cays in the Capricorn-Bunker Group. (From Hemson & McDougall 2013) ................................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 8. Annual discharge (ML) for the Fitzroy River at Rockhampton. (From Australian Bureau of Meteorology) ........................................................................................................................................ 36 Figure 9. Estimated plume extent for the Fitzroy River in early 2011. (From M. Devlin) ..................... 37 Figure 10. Rockhampton flooded in 2011 following ex-tropical cyclone Tasha rainfall. ...................... 42 Figure 11.(a) Burnett flood plume at river mouth 2013, (b) Map of Burnett-Mary flood plumes (From Devlin et al.) .......................................................................................................................................... 43 Figure 12. Monthly cumulative marine turtle strandings in Queensland between 1998-2012 inclusive. (From Meager & Limpus 2012) ............................................................................................................. 45 Figure 13. Exposure of the GBR Marine Park to tropical cyclones, COTS and thermal stress between 2001 and 2011. (from Maynard et al. 2013) ......................................................................................... 48 List of Tables Table 1. Conservation status of habitats and fauna in wetlands of the Fitzroy Basin and coastal catchments. (From Environmental Protection and Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 and Queensland Nature Conservation Act (NCA) 1992) .................................................................................................... 8 Table 2. Area of wetland systems and their extent change for the Fitzroy Basin and coastal catchments. (From WetlandInfo, Queensland Government, www.wetlandinfo.ehp.qld.gov.au/wetlands/) .................................................................................... 11 Table 3. Bioregions of the Fitzroy marine area from north to south. Reef bioregions are coloured blue and non-reef bioregions orange. (From Day et al. 2002; GBRMPA website). ...................................... 14 Table 4. Status of inshore coral reefs in the Fitzroy region between 2008 and 2013: ■ = very good (80‐100), ■ = good (60 ‐ <80), ■ = moderate (40 ‐ <60), ■ = poor (20 ‐ <40), ■ = very poor (0 ‐ <20). (From Thompson et al. 2013)................................................................................................................ 20 Table 5. Area of seagrass shallower than 15 m in the NRM regions and entire GBR (from McKenzie 2010) within the boundaries of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. ..................................... 21 Table 6. Long‐term status of seagrass meadows based on abundance in reef and coastal habitats Fitzroy region: July 2005 – May 2012 ■ = very good (80‐100), ■ = good (60 ‐ <80), ■ = moderate (40 ‐ <60), ■ = poor (20 ‐ <40), ■ = very poor (0 ‐ <20). (From McKenzie et al. 2014) ................................. 22 Table 7. Seagrass status (community & environment) for the Fitzroy region: July 2011 – May 2012 . 23 ■ = very good (80-100), ■ = good (60 - <80), ■ = moderate (40 - <60), ■ = poor (20 - <40), ■ = very poor (0 - <20). (From McKenzie et al. 2014) ......................................................................................... 23 Table 8. Minimal light threshold exceedance for days seagrass are exposed to low light levels. ....... 24 Table 9. Conservation status of marine fauna found in the Fitzroy Basin marine region. (from EPBC website and NCA website). ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Queensland Public Boat Ramps
    Queensland public boat ramps Ramp Location Ramp Location Atherton shire Brisbane city (cont.) Tinaroo (Church Street) Tinaroo Falls Dam Shorncliffe (Jetty Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Balonne shire Shorncliffe (Sinbad Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank St George (Bowen Street) Jack Taylor Weir Shorncliffe (Yundah Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Banana shire Wynnum (Glenora Street) Wynnum Creek—north bank Baralaba Weir Dawson River Broadsound shire Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (lower ramp) Carmilla Beach (Carmilla Creek Road) Carmilla Creek—south bank, mouth of creek Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (upper ramp) Clairview Beach (Colonial Drive) Clairview Beach Moura Dawson River—8 km west of Moura St Lawrence (Howards Road– Waverley Creek) Bund Creek—north bank Lake Victoria Callide Creek Bundaberg city Theodore Dawson River Bundaberg (Kirby’s Wall) Burnett River—south bank (5 km east of Bundaberg) Beaudesert shire Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (downstream) Logan River (Henderson Street– Henderson Reserve) Logan Reserve Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (upstream) Biggenden shire Burdekin shire Paradise Dam–Main Dam 500 m upstream from visitors centre Barramundi Creek (Morris Creek Road) via Hodel Road Boonah shire Cromarty Creek (Boat Ramp Road) via Giru (off the Haughton River) Groper Creek settlement Maroon Dam HG Slatter Park (Hinkson Esplanade) downstream from jetty Moogerah Dam AG Muller Park Groper Creek settlement Bowen shire (Hinkson
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Wetlands of Australia ± 40 61 !!
    Ramsar Wetlands of Australia ± 40 61 !! !1 46 ! 58 ! DARWIN !2 Ramsar Sites 1, Cobourg Peninsula 2, Kakadu National Park !31 3, Moulting Lagoon 4, Logan Lagoon 32 5, Lavinia ! 6, Pitt Water-Orielton Lagoon 59 7, Apsley Marshes ! 8, East Coast Cape Barren Island Lagoons 33 9, Flood Plain Lower Ringarooma River ! 10, Jocks Lagoon 11, Interlaken (Lake Crescent) 42 12, Little Waterhouse Lake 34 ! 13, Corner Inlet ! 14, Barmah Forest 15, Gunbower Forest 16, Hattah-Kulkyne Lakes 17, Kerang Wetlands 18, Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula 44 19, Western Port ! 20, Western District Lakes 21, Gippsland Lakes 22, Lake Albacutya 23, Towra Point Nature Reserve 24, Hunter Estuary Wetlands 25, The Coorong, Lakes Alexandrina and Albert Wetland 51 26, Bool and Hacks Lagoons ! 27, Coongie Lakes 28, The Macquarie Marshes 29, Riverland 30, There is no site with this number 27 BRISBANE !41 31, Ord River Floodplain ! 32, Lakes Argyle and Kununurra 33, Roebuck Bay !43 34, Eighty-mile Beach !49 !50 35, Forrestdale and Thomsons Lakes 53 !60 !65 ! 36, Peel-Yalgorup System !47 37, Toolibin Lake (also known as Lake Toolibin) 28 38, Vasse-Wonnerup System ! 39, Lake Warden System 40, Hosnies Spring PERTH 41, Moreton Bay 5!4 ! !52 42, Bowling Green Bay !35 37 24 43, Currawinya Lakes (Currawinya National Park) 36 ! ! 44, Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area (Shoalwater Bay and part of Corio Bay) !38 55! !39 45, Ginini Flats Wetland Complex 63! 23 ! SYDNEY 46, Pulu Keeling National Park 56 ! 29 ! !62 47, Little Llangothlin Nature Reserve ADELAIDE !16
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Seafood Industry Association Et Al (PDF
    - Joint submission to the Productivity Commission Issues Paper Barriers to Effective Climate Change Adaptation Joint submission prepared by - Perez, E., Jenkins, H., Price, L., Donnelly, R., & Conn, W. (2011) for the Queensland Seafood Industry Association, Australian Prawn Farmers Association, Oceanwatch Australia and Pro-vision Reef. Acknowledgements The Queensland Seafood Industry Association (QSIA) has actively engaged in helping to facilitate a better understanding of climate change issues at a State and National level. This submission demonstrates the ongoing positive relationship between sectors of industry to help identify the barriers to climate change adaption in the context of fisheries and conservation management. The issues are complicated and require joint industry and government solutions. The QSIA wishes to thank Helen Jenkins (Executive Officer, Australian Prawn Farmers Association), Lowri Pryce (Executive Officer, Oceanwatch), Ryan Donnelly (Pro-Vision Reef) and Wil Conn (Industry Recovery Officer – Cyclone Yasi, Seafood and Aquaculture Industries) for their contributions to this submission. The QSIA would also like to thank industry and researcher contributions to earlier versions of the submission 1. 1 The QSIA appreciates the images provided by Richard Fitzpatrick and the Australian Prawn Farmers Association. 2 CCContentsContents 1. Introduction 4-5 1.1. Queensland Seafood Industry Association 1.2. Australia Prawn Farmers Association 1.3. Oceanwatch Australia 1.4. Pro-vision Reef 1.5. Submission Structure 2. Background 6-7 2.1. Industry Structure 2.2. Need to Engage on the Climate Change Issue 3. Key Issues 8-27 3.1. Uncertainty 3.2. Barriers 3.3. Regulatory Reforms 3.4. Insurance Markets 3.5. Regulation 3.6. Government Provision of Public Goods 3.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Christie Gallen, Kristie Thompson, Chris Paxman, Jochen Mueller
    2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 Christie Gallen, Kristie Thompson, Chris Paxman, Jochen Mueller Project Team - Inshore Marine Water Quality Monitoring - Christie Gallen1, Chris Paxman1, Kristie Thompson1, Elissa O’Malley1, Natalia Montero Ruiz1, Jochen Mueller1 Project Team - Assessment of Terrestrial Run-off Entering the Reef: Christie Gallen1, Kristie Thompson1, Chris Paxman1, Jochen Mueller1, Eduardo Da Silva2, Dominique O’Brien2, Dieter Tracey2, Caroline Petus2, Michelle Devlin2 1The National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (Entox) The University of Queensland 39 Kessels Rd Coopers Plains Qld 4108 2 The Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), Catchment to Reef Processes Research Group, James Cook University Townsville, Qld 4811 © Copyright University of Queensland 2016 All rights are reserved and no part of this document may be reproduced, stored or copied in any form or by any means whatsoever except with the prior written permission of the University of Queensland. ISBN: 9781742721668 Report should be cited as: Gallen, C., Thompson, K., Paxman, C., Devlin, M., Mueller, J. (2016) Marine Monitoring Program. Annual Report for inshore pesticide monitoring: 2014 to 2015. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. The University of Queensland, The National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (Entox), Brisbane. Front cover image: View south towards the Russell River National Park and the junction of the Russell and Mulgrave Rivers over flooded sugar fields © Dieter Tracey, 2015. DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this document are factually correct, Entox does not make any representation or give any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose of the information or statements contained in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Cyclone-Generated Disturbance on a Tropical Reef Foraminifera Assemblage Received: 12 November 2015 Luke C
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Effects of cyclone-generated disturbance on a tropical reef foraminifera assemblage Received: 12 November 2015 Luke C. Strotz1, Briony L. Mamo2 & Dale Dominey-Howes3 Accepted: 05 April 2016 The sedimentary record, and associated micropalaeontological proxies, is one tool that has been Published: 29 April 2016 employed to quantify a region’s tropical cyclone history. Doing so has largely relied on the identification of allochthonous deposits (sediments and microfossils), sourced from deeper water and entrained by tropical cyclone waves and currents, in a shallow-water or terrestrial setting. In this study, we examine microfossil assemblages before and after a known tropical cyclone event (Cyclone Hamish) with the aim to better resolve the characteristics of this known signal. Our results identify no allochthonous material associated with Cyclone Hamish. Instead, using a swathe of statistical tools typical of ecological studies but rarely employed in the geosciences, we identify new, previously unidentified, signal types. These signals include a homogenising effect, with the level of differentiation between sample sites greatly reduced immediately following Cyclone Hamish, and discernible shifts in assemblage diversity. In the subsequent years following Hamish, the surface assemblage returns to its pre-cyclone form, but results imply that it is unlikely the community ever reaches steady state. Tropical reef systems are important refugia for biodiversity, harbouring an array of critical and charismatic taxa, and have both significant cultural and economic value1. The high-intensity winds, waves, torrential rains, and flooding associated with tropical cyclone events result in high levels of damage to tropical reef communities2,3 through direct physical destruction4,5 and increased sediment input and suspended sediment residence times6–8.
    [Show full text]
  • Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane
    ARCHIVE: Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 By Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane The date of the cyclone refers to the day of landfall or the day of the major impact if it is not a cyclone making landfall from the Coral Sea. The first number after the date is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for that month followed by the three month running mean of the SOI centred on that month. This is followed by information on the equatorial eastern Pacific sea surface temperatures where: W means a warm episode i.e. sea surface temperature (SST) was above normal; C means a cool episode and Av means average SST Date Impact January 1858 From the Sydney Morning Herald 26/2/1866: an article featuring a cruise inside the Barrier Reef describes an expedition’s stay at Green Island near Cairns. “The wind throughout our stay was principally from the south-east, but in January we had two or three hard blows from the N to NW with rain; one gale uprooted some of the trees and wrung the heads off others. The sea also rose one night very high, nearly covering the island, leaving but a small spot of about twenty feet square free of water.” Middle to late Feb A tropical cyclone (TC) brought damaging winds and seas to region between Rockhampton and 1863 Hervey Bay. Houses unroofed in several centres with many trees blown down. Ketch driven onto rocks near Rockhampton. Severe erosion along shores of Hervey Bay with 10 metres lost to sea along a 32 km stretch of the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Patterns in Coastal Rainforest of Shoalwater Bay, Central Queensland
    362 Cunninghamia 8(3): 2004 McCarthy et al., Floristic patterns in coastal rainforest of Shoalwater Bay Floristic patterns in coastal rainforest of Shoalwater Bay, Central Queensland Peter McCarthy1, Peter Clarke2 and Jeremy Bruhl3 113 Knox St., Clovelly NSW 2031; 2Botany, School of Environmental Sciences and Natual Resources Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA; 3Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd, Sydney NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA. Abstract: A study was undertaken of the floristic patterns in coastal rainforest (low closed forest) of Shoalwater Bay, central Queensland. The site encompasses 60 km of coastline, extending from latitude 22° 08’ 30’’ to 22° 30’ 0” and longitude 150° 02’ 00” to 150° 24’ 30”. The rainforest grows on coastal Holocene sand dunes, swales and sand flats, distributed as a series of 27 discrete patches greater than one hectare along 60 kilometres of coastline. Mean patch size was 10.7 hectares (maximum 150 hectares). The flora was predominantly woody, and lacked the complex growth forms of Webb (1968). Floristic links with central and north Queensland were strong, with some species distributions extending into Malesia and the Pacific. Three physical strata, emergent (composed of trees), canopy (composed of trees, vines and epiphytes) and sub-canopy (trees, vines and herbs) were recognised. The herb layer was very poorly developed. Eighty-one species were recorded, representing 42 families and 72 genera. Sixty three quadrats were sampled across the rainforest patches to measure abundance of all vascular taxa using frequency score. Five floristic groups were defined from agglomerative classification analysis, one representing mixed forest, two representing low microphyll vine forest (LMVF) and two representing microphyll vine thicket (MVT).
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclone Hamish on One Tree Island – Information from In-Situ Sensor Data
    The Impact of Cyclone Hamish on One Tree Island – information from in-situ sensor data Scott Bainbridge, Damian Eggeling, Gavin Feather Australian Institute of Marine Science Track of Cyclone Hamish 6th March, 4am 7th March, 4am 8th March, 4am 9th March, 4am 10th March, 4am NOAA Satellite Image – 9th March 2009 Wind Speed Categories Wind KPH Knots M/Sec Category Gale Force >62 >33 >17 Destructive >89 >48 >25 Cyclonic >117 >63 >32 Source: BoM web site Cyclone Map for 9th March 2009 One Tree Island Source: BoM web site Cyclone report 4pm 9th March A Cyclone WARNING remains current for coastal and island communities from Yeppoon to Hervey Bay. A Cyclone WATCH remains current for coastal and island communities from Hervey Bay to Tewantin. Severe Tropical Cyclone Hamish, a CATEGORY 4 CYCLONE, is located off the Capricornia coast and at 4:00 pm EST was estimated to be 255 kilometres east of Yeppoon and 245 kilometres north northeast of Bundaberg, moving southeast at 17 kilometres per hour. Severe Tropical Cyclone Hamish poses a threat to exposed coastal and island communities between Yeppoon and Hervey Bay [including Heron, Fraser and Lady Elliot Islands]. The cyclone is expected to maintain a southeast track parallel to the coast during the next 24 hours. In the 24 to 48 hour period the cyclone is expected to become slow moving and weaken slightly. Details of Severe Tropical Cyclone Hamish at 4:00 pm EST: .Centre located near...... 22.8 degrees South 153.2 degrees East .Location accuracy........ within 28 kilometres .Recent movement.......... towards the southeast at 17 kilometres per hour .Wind gusts near centre..
    [Show full text]
  • Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) Has Been Prepared to Ensure There Is a Consistant Approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire
    F Document Set ID: 8554803 Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2020 FOREWORD Foreword by the Chair, Andrew Ireland of the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group. The Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) has been prepared to ensure there is a consistant approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire. This plan is an important tool for managing potential disasters and is a demonstrated commitment towards enhancing the safety of the Livingstone Shire community. The plan identifies potential hazards and risks in the area, identifies steps to mitigate these risks and includes strategies to enact should a hazard impact and cause a disaster. This plan has been developed to be consistant with the Disaster Management Standards and Guidelines and importantly to intergrate into the Queensland Disaster Management Arrangements (QDMA). The primary focus is to help reduce the potential adverse effect of an event by conducting activities before, during or after to help reduce loss of human life, illness or injury to humans, property loss or damage, or damage to the environment. I am confident the LDMP provides a comprehensive framework for our community, and all residents and vistors to our region can feel secure that all agenices involved in the Livingstone Shire LDMP are dedicated and capable with a shared responsibility in disaster management. On behalf of the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group, I would like to thank you for taking the time to read this important plan. Livingstone Shire Council Mayor Andrew Ireland Chair, Local Disaster Management Group Dated: 26 August 2020 Page 2 of 175 ECM # xxxxxx Version 6 Document Set ID: 8554803 Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2020 ENDORSEMENT This Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) has been prepared by the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group for the Livingstone Shire Council as required under section 57 of the Disaster Management Act 2003 (the Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Region Region
    THE MACKAY REGION Visitor Guide 2020 mackayregion.com VISITOR INFORMATION CENTRES Mackay Region Visitor Information Centre CONTENTS Sarina Field of Dreams, Bruce Highway, Sarina P: 07 4837 1228 EXPERIENCES E: [email protected] Open: 9am – 5pm, 7 days (May to October) Wildlife Encounters ...........................................................................................4–5 9am – 5pm Monday to Friday (November to April) Nature Reserved ..................................................................................................6–7 9am – 3pm Saturday Hooked on Mackay ...........................................................................................8–9 9am – 1pm Sunday Family Fun ..............................................................................................................10–11 Melba House Visitor Information Centre Local Flavours & Culture ............................................................................12–13 Melba House, Eungella Road, Marian P: 07 4954 4299 LOCATIONS E: [email protected] Cape Hillsborough & Hibiscus Coast ...............................................14–15 Open: 9am – 3pm, 7 days Eungella & Pioneer Valley .........................................................................16–17 Mackay Visitor Information Centre Mackay City & Marina .................................................................................. 18–19 320 Nebo Road, Mackay (pre-Feb 2020) Northern Beaches .........................................................................................20–21
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Modelling Life-Cycle Costs
    FINAL REPORT Project Title: A4: Accounting for Life-cycle Costing Implications and Network Performance Risks of Rain and Flood Events (2013/14 – 2015/16) Project No: 010561 Author/s: Andrew Beecroft and Edward Peters Client: Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads Date: 24/01/2017 AN INITIATIVE BY: TC-710-4-4-8 A4: ACCOUNTING FOR LIFE-CYCLE COSTING IMPLICATIONS AND NETWORK PERFORMANCE RISKS OF RAIN AND FLOOD EVENTS TC-710-4-4-8 24/01/2017 SUMMARY Although the Report is believed to be The rain and flood events across Queensland between 2010 and 2013 correct at the time of publication, showed that the road network is more exposed to damage from such events ARRB Group Ltd, to the extent lawful, than desirable, with between 23% and 62% of the state-controlled network excludes all liability for loss (whether closed or with limited access over four summers. With increasingly uncertain arising under contract, tort, statute or climatic factors and stretched infrastructure budgets, efficient optimisation otherwise) arising from the contents of and prioritisation of works is critical to the overall network condition. the Report or from its use. Where such liability cannot be excluded, it is Historically, works programs were focused on the highest priority treatments, reduced to the full extent lawful. which in some cases resulted in an overall deterioration in network condition Without limiting the foregoing, people over time, as measured by condition indicators such as roughness and seal should apply their own skill and age. Strategic, timely maintenance and rehabilitation programs are thought judgement when using the information to be preferable to one-off major reconstruction programs such as the contained in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia: an Examination of Information and Warnings Broadcasted to Inform Mitigation and Community Preparedness
    Severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia: an examination of information and warnings broadcasted to inform mitigation and community preparedness Kevin Ronan CQ University, Bushfire and Naturual Hazards CRC Bruce Gunn Bureau of Meteorology Deanne Bird Risk Frontiers, University of Iceland AFAC16 CONFERENCE PAPER Severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia: An examination of information and warnings broadcasted to inform mitigation and community preparedness Deanne Bird1, 2, Shannon Panchuk3, Kevin Ronan4, Linda Anderson-Berry3, Christine Hanley5, Shelby Canterford6, Ian Mannix7, Bruce Gunn3 1 Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University, Melbourne 2 Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 3 Hazards Warnings and Forecasts Division, Bureau of Meteorology 4 Clinical Psychology, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 5 Population Research Lab, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 6 Community Safety Branch, Community Safety and Earth Monitoring Division, Geoscience Australia 7 ABC Radio Emergency Broadcasting Abstract The event of severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia is particularly interesting for two reasons. Firstly, it is the most intense cyclone to make landfall so far south on the east coast of Australia during the satellite era. Secondly, it rapidly intensified from a Category 2 to a Category 5 system in 36 hours. While coastal residents of the region, including Yeppoon and Byfield are accustomed to receiving cyclone forecasts and warnings, many were taken by surprise by the intensity of Marcia and the fact that it wasn’t another ‘near miss’. Being situated further inland, the residents of Rockhampton were even more surprised. Given the rapid escalation in intensity of this event, the effective transmission of warnings and how these were used to inform mitigation and community preparedness was particularly important.
    [Show full text]