DOCSLIB.ORG

On-Board Surveillance System for Transit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On-Board Surveillance System for Transit On-Board Surveillance System for Transit Transit Commission June 19, 2013 Background • OC Tranpso is committed to providing a safe and reliable transit system • Wide range of safety and security initiatives currently in place as part of overall program: - Transecure; - Night Stop; - Taxi Link; - Passenger Assistance Alarms; and, - Emergency Phones. • Department identified the need to explore the feasibility and costs associated with the use of cameras on its fleet in its 2012 Departmental Priorities and report back to the Transit Commission on the findings. 2 Key Findings • Studies have shown that the introduction of enhanced surveillance systems has a modest impact on crime prevention; • Studies also suggest that surveillance systems by themselves do not contribute to a sense of increased safety and security; • The majority of jurisdictions that have implemented video surveillance capabilities find it to be an invaluable investigative tool (administrative, criminal and civil) within a broader safety and security program; • Surveillance systems should form part of our overall comprehensive safety program; • A solution to meet OC Transpo’s stated requirements is feasible and can be supported by established vendors with current technologies; 3 Key Findings (Cont’d) • Cost for a comprehensive OC Transpo onboard surveillance system over a 6 year aggregated cost are approximately: - Full OC Transpo fleet $16.32 M - Double Decker bus fleet only $ 2.35 M - PARA Transpo bus fleet only $ 2.42 M - Articulated bus fleet only $ 6.83 M - 40 foot bus fleet only $ 8.45 M • Any expansion of surveillance systems will complement the current surveillance system for and budgeted in the O-Train expansion and Confederation Line; • Implementation of a program can be phased in according to budget availability; and, • The current wireless bus network infrastructure used by OC Transpo is available and has capacity and reduces overall costs4 . Other Jurisdictions at a Glance Retention Type of Storage of Jurisdiction In Use Since Vendor Policy Monitoring Video 15 - Operating Hrs (Bus & Passive Toronto Transit Street cars) March 2008 No remote On-Bus Commission 72 – Elapsed Hrs (Rail) Networks monitoring 7 – Days (Wheel Trans) Passive SEON Design Mississauga Transit 2011 24 - Operating Hrs No remote On-Bus Inc monitoring Passive Brampton Transit 2009 72 -Elapsed hrs No remote On-Bus monitoring Passive SEON Design Grand River Transit 2011 72 - Elapsed Hrs No remote On-Bus Inc monitoring Passive SEON Design London Transit 2011 12 - Elapsed Days No remote On-Bus Inc monitoring Passive Winnipeg Transit 2009 10 -Elapsed Days No remote On-Bus Apollo Video monitoring Passive with remote On-Bus Trapeze Edmonton Transit Spring 2013 Unknown monitoring Group Note: A growing number of US jurisdictions are implementing systems with remote monitoring 5 capabilities Stakeholder Consultations • OC Transpo Management • Para Transpo • Ottawa Transit Commission • Fleet Operations/ • City of Ottawa Legal Maintenance Services & By -Law and • Ottawa Police Service Regulatory Services Branch • Grand River Transit • Transit Law (Waterloo) • ATU • Toronto Transit Commission • IT 6 On-Board Cameras Benefits The benefits of an on-board mobile surveillance system may include: • Incident response and investigative support; • Fraudulent claim prevention and reduction; • Incident deterrence through increased accountability; and, • Enhanced operator and customer safety and security. 7 Elements of an Effective On-board Surveillance Program Consultations and Documented Policies and Communications Procedures Safety and Security Focus Sound Technical Dedicated Resources, Implementation Support & Sustainment 8 System Components Video Retrieval 1 (Desktop) Interior Exterior Camera Camera Mobile Digital Video Video Retrieval 2 (Laptop) Recovering Device 9 Desired Surveillance System Capabilities • Optimized coverage in each bus/vehicle to include a forward facing camera; • High quality imagery/high quality audio; • Retention and retrieval capabilities; • Secure, robust and tamperproof components; • Integrated access control safeguards and measures to limit access based on roles and responsibilities of authorized personnel; • Trigger/alarm based activation for streaming video; and, • Streaming video for mobile remote monitoring by Transit Law/authorized personnel (optional). 10 Potential Configurations OPTION 1: Basic System OPTION 3: Basic System + Remote Downloading + Remote Monitoring • Digital Video Recorder (DVR) on the bus, always on when bus is in operation, Adds live monitoring of cameras during an emergency to help • DVR records over video after set amount of time, Transit Law Operations assess • Retrieving video for an investigation requires visit to the situation on a bus. Transit Law bus to download from the DVR or swap the hard drive. Operations Transit Law Transit Law OPTION 2: Basic System + Remote Downloading OPTION 4: Basic System + Remote Downloading + Remote Monitoring + Mobile Monitoring Adds the capability to retrieve video remotely for an investigation, from an authorized Adds live monitoring of cameras computer, over the OC Transpo mobile network. from Transit Law vehicles onsite during an emergency, to help assess the situation on a bus. Transit Law Operations Transit Law Transit Law 11 OC Transpo – “Preferred” Option 12 Feasibility & Implementation Considerations • Camera Requirements • Video Monitor Requirements • Power and Space Requirements • Cabling • Video Retrieval Workstations • Video Storage • Costs and Resource Requirements • Privacy and Policy 13 Sample – 60 Foot Bus Camera Placements Figure 1 – Interior Cameras 1 2 8 7 5 3 Mobile DVR 4 6 Figure 2 – Interior/Exterior Cameras (optional) A D 1 2 8 7 5 B 3 Mobile DVR 4 6 C 14 Cost Analysis • Cost estimates have been prepared for five options: § Option 1 – Full OC Transpo Fleet § Option 2 – Double Decker Fleet only § Option 3 – Para Transpo Fleet only § Option 4 – Articulated buses only § Option 5 – 40 Foot Buses Only • Costs are reflected in terms of: § Initial capital and operating costs § Recurring operating costs (based on a six year life cycle) 15 Cost Summary & Estimate The table below summarizes the cost considerations associated with retrofitting the current fleet of OC Transpo vehicles and an on-board digital video recording system with the preferred option: Option Number Implemen- One-time Ongoing Ongoing Total Option Description of tation Implemen- Operations Operations Aggregated Cameras Costs tation Yearly 6 year Costs 6 Year Cost Capital Costs Costs 1 Full Fleet 6,516 $10,400,000 $400,000 $920,000 $5,520,000 $16,320,000 2 Double 600 $770 ,000 $139 ,000 $240 ,000 $1,440 ,000 $2,349 ,000 Deckers Only 3 Para 534 $840,000 $139,000 $240,000 $1,440,000 $2,419,000 Transpo Only 4 Articulated 2,872 $3,950,000 $238,000 $440,000 $2,640,000 $6,828,000 Buses (60 foot) 5 40 Foot 2,510 $5,330,000 $238,000 $480,000 $2,880,000 $8,448,000 Buses 16 O-Train and Confederation Line Surveillance Systems Both the O-Train and Confederation Line vehicles will be equipped with surveillance systems (tied to the current contracts). 17 Recommended Strategy • The Department recognizes that on-board surveillance systems can contribute to a positive impact to safety and security on the Transit system. • The recommendation is to build the program incrementally on a go-forward basis: • The O -Train expansion project includes on -board surveillance for the new trains and will be implemented as part of the project; • The Confederation Line includes on-board surveillance on all trains and will also be implemented as part of the construction of this new line; and, • The Para vehicles currently being scoped out for procurement will include pre-writing and space capabilities to implement cameras in the future when funding is available and stakeholder feedback confirms that cameras should be installed. 18 Recommended Strategy (Cont’d) • Recognizing its financial restrictions, the Department is recommending that: – All future OC Transpo buses be purchased with on-board surveillance equipment and be operationalized incrementally as soon as the vehicles are put into service; • Staff are working with the Rail Implementation Office to determine if vehicles are needed to manage detours during the 5-year construction of the Confederation Line. • Details on required vehicles are being finalized and will be communicated to the Commission as they become available. 19 Recommended Strategy (Cont’d) • The Department is bringing forward a ten-point plan that will enhance our safety program and build upon the feedback we have been hearing from our community partners on how OC Transpo can further promote, enhance and work with other stakeholders to achieve a common goal of a safe, reliable Transit system. • Details will be outlined in the Transit Services Priorities report scheduled for July. 20 Questions? 21.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Res-Urban-20.Pdf
    Transit Friendly Design Features INTRODUCTION North American municipal and regional planning authorities are pursuing urban growth management strategies that preserve or improve urban “livability”. In the Lower Mainland, concerns about air quality and traffic congestion are central themes in regional planning, such as the GVRD Creating Our Future program, and the Transport 2021 project. Growing communities throughout BC share similar concerns. These studies identify a larger role for public transit as a key strategy for achieving a reduction in the number of automobile trips and an improved urban environment. Achieving higher transit ridership is a challenge in an automobile oriented society, and transit agencies should not bear this responsibility alone. Public Transit in B.C. Public transit is provided in over 58 municipal areas in British Columbia, including conventional, paratransit and handyDART services. BC Transit is responsible for planning, funding, marketing, and implementation of these systems. In the regions of Victoria and Vancouver, BC Transit operates these services. In other areas of the province, BC Transit works in partnership with local governments and private contractors to provide transit service. Public transit is simply the movement of people in groups, generally in large vehicles operating on fixed routes and schedules. These services are available to the public at fares that vary from community to community. The conventional bus is the most common vehicle in use in larger urban areas. The emphasis here is on integrating conventional bus service with land use planning. 1 Transit and Land Use Planning Making the Transit Connection ... to Land Use In order to attract more transit customers, the strong influence of land use and urban design on travel behaviour needs to be recognized and utilized to the advantage of transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Sustainability of Transit: an Overview of the Literature and Findings from Expert Interviews
    Social Sustainability of Transit: An Overview of the Literature and Findings from Expert Interviews Kelly Bennett1 and Manish Shirgaokar2 Planning Program, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2E3 1 Research Assistant/Student: [email protected] 2 Principal Investigator/Assistant Professor: [email protected] Phone: (780) 492-2802 Date of publication: 29th February, 2016 Bennett and Shirgaokar Intentionally left blank Page 2 of 45 Bennett and Shirgaokar TABLE OF CONTENTS Funding Statement and Declaration of Conflicting Interests p. 5 ABSTRACT p. 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY p. 7 1. Introduction p. 12 2. Methodology p. 12 3. Measuring Equity p. 13 3.1 Basic Analysis 3.2 Surveys 3.3 Models 3.4 Lorenz Curve and Gini Coefficient 3.5 Evaluating Fare Structure 4. Literature Review p. 16 4.1 Age 4.1.1 Seniors’ Travel Behaviors 4.1.2 Universal Design 4.1.3 Fare Structures 4.1.4 Spatial Distribution and Demand Responsive Service 4.2 Race and Ethnicity 4.2.1 Immigrants 4.2.2 Transit Fares 4.2.3 Non-work Accessibility 4.2.4 Bus versus Light Rail 4.3 Income 4.3.1 Fare Structure 4.3.2 Spatial Distribution 4.3.3 Access to Employment 4.3.4 Non-work Accessibility 4.3.5 Bus versus Light Rail 4.4 Ability 4.4.1 Comfort and Safety 4.4.2 Demand Responsive Service 4.4.3 Universal Design 4.5 Gender 4.5.1 Differences Between Men and Women’s Travel Needs 4.5.2 Safety Page 3 of 45 Bennett and Shirgaokar 5.
    [Show full text]
  • York Region Transit
    The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York Jonathan English Columbia University CUTA Conference May 2016 Introduction • Is density the most important determinant of transit system success? • Can transit be successful in areas with relatively low density and a suburban built form? • Do service increases and reductions affect ridership? • The goal is to find natural experiments that can answer these questions The Region Source: Wikimedia The Comparison York Region Transit Brampton Transit • Focused expansion on • Developed grid network major corridors, of high-service bus including pioneering routes Viva BRT • Tailored service to demand on secondary corridors High Frequency Routes York Brampton Green = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Grey = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Source: Public Schedules and Google Earth Principal Findings • Increased service improves ridership performance • “Network effect” means that comprehensive network of high-service routes, rather than focus on select corridors, produces largest ridership gains • Well-designed service improvements can be undertaken while maintaining stable fare recovery Brampton vs York Service 1.8 1.6 1.4 /Capita 1.2 1 0.8 Kilometres 0.6 0.4 Vehicle 0.2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 York Brampton Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton vs York Ridership 40 35 Brampton: +57.7% 30 25 20 15 Riders/Capita 10 York: +29.7% 5 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Making Transit Functional
    MAKING TRANSIT FUNCTIONAL A guide to a frequent, affordable, and accessible system in Winnipeg Prepared by FUNCTIONAL TRANSIT WINNIPEG March 16, 2015 [email protected] www.functionaltransit.com “Transit works best where there are many destinations along something that feels like a straight line.” – Jarrett Walker, Human Transit 1 PREFACE This report was compiled by Functional Transit Winnipeg Functional Transit Winnipeg is a grassroots group of Winnipeggers who volunteer their time to research and advocate for improved public transit. This group came together over the concern that the Southwest Corridor will make public transit worse for Winnipeggers. We advocate for improving bus frequency within Winnipeg Transit’s existing service. This report was compiled in order to explain the deficiencies of the current plan for the Southwest Corridor in Winnipeg, and to lay out an alternative strategy that would have a far more positive impact on public transit for the same price as the current project being undertaken by the City of Winnipeg. Our conclusions are drawn from publicly available data, reports from the City of Winnipeg and transit research. We have made every effort to be factually accurate in our assessment of transit service and investment in Winnipeg. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and contributors only. We welcome response and input from those individuals who may have a different interpretation or access to more information. We can be reached at [email protected]. Lead author: Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • Translink Efficiency Review for Translink Commission
    TransLink Efficiency Review for TransLink Commission ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Shirocca Consulting gratefully acknowledges the assistance and cooperation in providing data and information for this report from Coast Mountain Bus Company and TransLink as well as: • BC Transit Victoria • Calgary Transit • Edmonton Transit System • King County Metro (Seattle) • OC Transpo (Ottawa) San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (MUNI) • Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) • Winnipeg Transit Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i 1. INTRODUCTION I Role of the TransLink Commission 1 This Assignment 2 2. TRANSLINK OVERVIEW 3 2010 10-Year Base Plan and Funding Stabilization Plan 3 3. TRANSLINK'S FINANCIAL PLAN AND PERFORMANCE 5 Revenue and Expenditure Growth 6 Revenue Growth 6 Expenditure Growth 6 Budget to Actual Performance 7 Targeted Efficiency Initiatives 8 Cumulative Funded Surplus 8 Capital Projects 9 Variance in Project Cost 9 Cash Flow Variance 10 2012 Budget 11 Economic Assumptions 11 Annual Budget Process 13 Review of 2012 Budget 13 2012 Bus Division Budget 18 Summary of Findings 18 4. TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 19 Performance Indicators Used 21 Conventional Transit Services 21 Five-Year Trend 22 System Performance 24 How does TransLink’s Performance Compare to its Peers? 25 Summary of Findings 32 Custom Transit Services 33 Five-Year Trend 33 Custom Transit Performance 36 How Does TransLink’s Performance Compare to its Peers? 37 Summary of Findings 42 5. BUS DIVISION PERFORMANCE 43 Performance Indicators Used 44 Conventional Bus Service 45 Five-Year Trend
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Version
    OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION | AFL-CIO/CLC JULY / AUGUST 2014 A NEW BEGINNING FOR PROGRESSIVE LABOR EDUCATION & ACTIVISM ATU ACQUIRES NATIONAL LABOR COLLEGE CAMPUS HAPPY LABOUR DAY INTERNATIONAL OFFICERS LAWRENCE J. HANLEY International President JAVIER M. PEREZ, JR. NEWSBRIEFS International Executive Vice President OSCAR OWENS TTC targets door safety woes International Secretary-Treasurer Imagine this: your subway train stops at your destination. The doors open – but on the wrong side. In the past year there have been INTERNATIONAL VICE PRESIDENTS 12 incidents of doors opening either off the platform or on the wrong side of the train in Toronto. LARRY R. KINNEAR Ashburn, ON – [email protected] The Toronto Transit Commission has now implemented a new RICHARD M. MURPHY “point and acknowledge” safety procedure to reduce the likelihood Newburyport, MA – [email protected] of human error when opening train doors. The procedure consists BOB M. HYKAWAY of four steps in which a subway operator must: stand up, open Calgary, AB – [email protected] the window as the train comes to a stop, point at a marker on the wall using their index finger and WILLIAM G. McLEAN then open the train doors. If the operator doesn’t see the marker he or she is instructed not to open Reno, NV – [email protected] the doors. JANIS M. BORCHARDT Madison, WI – [email protected] PAUL BOWEN Agreement in Guelph, ON, ends lockout Canton, MI – [email protected] After the City of Guelph, ON, locked out members of Local 1189 KENNETH R. KIRK for three weeks, city buses stopped running, and transit workers Lancaster, TX – [email protected] were out of work and out of a contract while commuters were left GARY RAUEN stranded.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Transit Business Plan to 2014
    East Side Lands – Master Environmental Servicing Plan and Community Plan GRAND RIVER TRANSIT BUSINESS PLAN TO 2014 January 2012 East Side Lands – Master Environmental Servicing Plan and Community Plan Grand River Transit – Business Plan to 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Milestones and Achievements ............................................................................... 5 3.0 Grand River Transit Business Plan Goals................................................................. 7 4.0 Factors Influencing GRT’s Growth .......................................................................... 9 5.0 GRT Service Plan and Strategies ........................................................................... 11 Service Expansion Plan within the Transit Service Area ...................................................................... 11 GRT Service to Township Urban Areas ................................................................................................ 23 Grand River Transit and Interregional Trips ........................................................................................ 26 6.0 Technology and Capital Assets ............................................................................. 29 7.0 Customer Service and Marketing Plan .................................................................. 33 8.0 Fare Strategies and Financial Plan .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Transit Bus in Manitoba
    Zero Emission Electric Transit Bus in Manitoba Prototype Electric Transit Bus Development and Demonstration Final Report Research Partnerships & Innovation Red River College Winnipeg, Manitoba June 2017 Ray Hoemsen Executive Director Research Partnerships & Innovation Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Electrified Public Transit ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Project Genesis ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Formulation, Objectives and Timelines............................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Project Formulation ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project
    9.8 Date: May 25, 2021 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of General Committee From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works June 9, 2021 Subject Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project Recommendation 1. That the report to General Committee entitled “Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project” dated May 25, 2021 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works be received for information. 2. That Phase 1 of the Service Integration Pilot Project recommendations for enhanced cross-boundary travel be received for information. Executive Summary The Ministry of Transportation has convened a Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table that includes representatives of all transit agencies and aims to improve connections and the customer experience for inter-municipal transit travel. The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) has engaged a consultant team to develop an agency-driven FSI model to present to the Provincial-Municipal Table in partnership with surrounding transit agencies including MiWay. Currently MiWay, along with several other 905 agencies, are prohibited from providing local service within City of Toronto, resulting in TTC providing duplicate service for their residents. In addition, transit fares are not integrated between the TTC and MiWay. In partnership with the TTC, the Burnhamthorpe Road corridor has been selected for a transit service integration pilot project in the near-term (targeting fall 2021). 9.8 General Committee 2021/05/25 2 Background For decades, transit service integration has been discussed and studied in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA). The Ministry of Transportation’s newly convened Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table consists of senior representatives from transit systems within the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) and the broader GO Transit service area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bid for Better Transit Improving Service with Contracted Operations Transitcenter Is a Foundation That Works to Improve Urban Mobility
    A Bid for Better Transit Improving service with contracted operations TransitCenter is a foundation that works to improve urban mobility. We believe that fresh thinking can change the transportation landscape and improve the overall livability of cities. We commission and conduct research, convene events, and produce publications that inform and improve public transit and urban transportation. For more information, please visit www.transitcenter.org. The Eno Center for Transportation is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that promotes policy innovation and leads professional development in the transportation industry. As part of its mission, Eno seeks continuous improvement in transportation and its public and private leadership in order to improve the system’s mobility, safety, and sustainability. For more information please visit: www.enotrans.org. TransitCenter Board of Trustees Rosemary Scanlon, Chair Eric S. Lee Darryl Young Emily Youssouf Jennifer Dill Clare Newman Christof Spieler A Bid for Better Transit Improving service with contracted operations TransitCenter + Eno Center for Transportation September 2017 Acknowledgments A Bid for Better Transit was written by Stephanie Lotshaw, Paul Lewis, David Bragdon, and Zak Accuardi. The authors thank Emily Han, Joshua Schank (now at LA Metro), and Rob Puentes of the Eno Center for their contributions to this paper’s research and writing. This report would not be possible without the dozens of case study interviewees who contributed their time and knowledge to the study and reviewed the report’s case studies (see report appendices). The authors are also indebted to Don Cohen, Didier van de Velde, Darnell Grisby, Neil Smith, Kent Woodman, Dottie Watkins, Ed Wytkind, and Jeff Pavlak for their detailed and insightful comments during peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Achievements - (June 2013 to September 2013)
    To: Metrolinx Board of Directors From: Robert Hollis Managing Director & Executive Vice President PRESTO Date: September 10th, 2013 Re: PRESTO Quarterly Report Recent Achievements - (June 2013 to September 2013) • Through the summer months, transit riders continued to embrace PRESTO and, as of August 26th, 2013, the system had reached more than 750,000 activated cards in circulation. On average, we’re welcoming 35,000 new PRESTO customers each month in the GTHA. o 75% of GO Transit riders are using PRESTO, making up the largest portion of the PRESTO customer base. • Ottawa’s OC Transpo continues its public deployment of PRESTO, with an average of more than 1,000 cards being distributed daily and over 167,000 total customers currently tapping on to an easier commute. The roll out program will run through October 2013, as 200,000 total cards will have been distributed to customers and the OC Transpo rollout will officially be complete. st o OC Transpo began offering a reduced rate fare on PRESTO as of July 1 . This reduced price is an incentive for customers to convert to PRESTO. th o As of Aug 15 , OC Transpo began charging the full $6 issuance fee for PRESTO cards. • PRESTO has also completed and launched The PRESTO Panel, a versatile and dynamic online market research tool. PRESTO began recruitment in August 2013, with a test group of registered customers who completed the 2012 Customer Satisfaction Survey. 130 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1500 130, rue Adelaide ouest, bureau 1500 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3P5 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 3P5 o The PRESTO Panel provides customer feedback that can be used to generate a wealth of insights into the system, and drive improvements in a variety of areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World
    Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World Jeffrey Casello, Professor of Transportation Planning and Engineering, University of Waterloo William Towns, MES Planning, Region of Waterloo (Grand River Transit) Adam Fraser, MSc Civil & Environmental Engineering, Town of the Blue Mountains Readers interested in more information on this report are encouraged to contact the authors: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Introduction Following a stretch of disinvestment in the postwar period, municipalities and regions around the world, but particularly in North America, have been actively re-investing in public transportation since the turn of the 21st century in order to achieve a variety of public goals. Specifically, this renewed emphasis on transit has aimed to: - Improve social equity by providing low-cost, effective access to a wider array of economic opportunities than might otherwise be available to all households, as well as quality-of- life-enhancing activities; - Decrease the energy and carbon intensity of personal travel and contribute to climate change mitigation efforts; - Influence land use to generate more compact, higher-density development that ultimately reduces the total need for and cost of travel (among other public utilities); - Lessen the negative environmental impacts of automobile-oriented transportation infrastructure and operations. The global pandemic stemming from the novel coronavirus (or COVID-19) has caused significant disruption to life in general and municipal service delivery in particular throughout 2020. While much remains unknown about the virus, it has become clear that COVID-19, like other socially- transmitted public health threats, is (in the absence of a vaccine) best mitigated by maintaining physical distance between individuals and avoiding mass gatherings at which illness may be transmitted widely.
    [Show full text]