Aerospace World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aerospace World Aerospace World By Suzann Chapman, Associate Editor Defense Scrutiny Grinds On Defense Secretary William S. Cohen told reporters May 14 that he had formed a Task Force on Defense Reform to recommend additional ways to stream- line Defense Department operations. Staff photo by Guy Aceto The task force is an outgrowth of the six-month-long Quadrennial Defense Review, released May 19. [See “Snap- shot of the QDR,” p. 17.] Cohen said the QDR didn’t have time to take a thorough look at “significant reforms” in management structure. What’s now needed, he said, is “to focus a good deal more analysis and effort” on the Office of the Secretary of Defense, its field agencies, and the military departments. “Essentially [OSD] has been growing like Topsy,” he reported. The Secretary did note that the Pentagon had made progress in re- Defense Secretary William S. Cohen addresses visitors at the Joint Services Open cent years through computerization House at Andrews AFB, Md., in May, shortly before introducing the Quadrennial and other practices, such as buying Defense Review. [See “Snapshot of the QDR,” p. 17.] off-the-shelf technology. These steps had created more efficient operations, he said, but he emphasized the need Arnold Punaro, senior vice presi- comedian, who attended the dedica- to accomplish “much more” in the way dent of Corporate Development at tion with his wife, Dolores, is the first of reform. “There’s a great deal of Science Applications International individual for whom a new airlifter has redundancy in much of what we do,” Corp. and former staff director of the been named. he claimed. Senate Armed Services Committee. Hope, who began his show business Cohen said he expected to have G. Kim Wincup, a program director career in vaudeville and continued the task force report its findings by at SAIC and former assistant secretary through 60 years of radio, film, and November 30. of the Air Force for Acquisition and television, entertained American troops former assistant secretary of the Army around the world for more than 50 years. Panel Members Named for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. In naming the aircraft for Hope during The Defense Secretary initially Dov Zakheim, corporate vice presi- the Air Force’s fiftieth anniversary, Air named seven business and defense dent and director of the Center for Policy Force Secretary Sheila E. Widnall said experts to the task force, stating that Planning, System Planning Corp., chief that she couldn’t think of a better tribute. they would work with DoD Comptrol- executive officer of SPC International, “We thought we’d give you, in a ler John J. Hamre, who was slated and former deputy under secretary of sense, an airplane—an airplane which, to succeed John P. White as deputy defense for Planning and Resources. like you, will go visit troops in some secretary of Defense. Cohen indicated he might add more of the least enviable locations on the Michael J. Bayer, business–gov- members. The task force will collabo- planet. After all, the folks crawling ernment relations consultant and for- rate with corporate leaders and the through mud and jungles don’t really mer official in the Energy and Com- National Defense Panel working on expect to see this plane any more than merce departments. an independent assessment of the they expected to see you—but the David Chu, director of Rand’s US military. plane, like you, will show up,” she said. Washington, D.C., office and former The aircraft will be assigned to the assistant secretary of defense, Pro- C-17 Christened Bob Hope 437th Airlift Wing, Charleston AFB, S. C. gram Analysis and Evaluation. In a ceremony April 22 at the Mc- Rhett Dawson, president, Infor- Donnell Douglas facility in Long Beach, USAF Forms Single Lab mation Technology Industry Council. Calif., the Air Force dedicated the Air Force Materiel Command an- James Locher, former assistant thirty-second C-17 Globemaster III to nounced in April that it had consolidated secretary of defense for Special Op- entertainer Bob Hope. The 94-year-old its lab operations in a single Air Force erations and Low-Intensity Conflict. 10 AIR FORCE Magazine / July 1997 laboratory—the Air Force Research staff, augmented by personnel from accident investigator, stated that there Laboratory. The move came as part of the four existing labs. was not enough evidence to determine the Air Force response to an ongoing AFMC officials expect the move to why the fuel stopped flowing to the Congressional initiative to consolidate reduce manpower but stated it was too engines. defense labs and test centers. early to estimate how many or where Portions of the aircraft wreckage, AFMC plans initially to retain its four positions would be cut. As part of an including the cockpit voice recorder, existing labs at their current locations earlier streamlining move, the Air Force flight data recorder, and one engine, but place them and the Air Force Of- consolidated its lab structure from 14 were recovered from the ocean floor fice of Scientific Research under one independent facilities to four superlabs in more than 5,100 feet of water by commander. in 1991. The service is also under the Navy’s Deep Submergence Unit. Current research labs are Arm strong a Congressional mandate to cut 35 The HC-130P, carrying a 10-person Laboratory, Brooks AFB, Tex.; Phillips percent of its lab manpower by 2001. crew and one passenger, was en route Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, N.M.; Rome to NAS North Island, Calif., from Port- Laboratory, Rome, N.Y.; and Wright Fuel Flow Problem Downed land IAP, Ore., on November 22 on a Laboratory, Wright-Pat terson AFB, HC-130P routine overwater navigation training Ohio. The Air Force Office of Scientific The accident investigation report mission when the aircraft crashed into Research is located at Bolling AFB, D.C. released April 24, on the crash of an the Pacific about 60 miles off the coast Maj. Gen. Richard R. Paul, formerly Air Force Reserve Command HC-130P of northern California. [See “Reserve AFMC director of Science and Technol- that claimed 10 lives, revealed that the Crash Claims 10,” February 1997 ogy, will command the new research aircraft’s engines ceased to operate “Aerospace World,” p. 13.] lab. The AFMC Science and Technology for lack of fuel flow. All 11 Reservists on board were staff will provide the core laboratory Col. Larry L. Landtroop, the lead assigned to the 939th Rescue Wing The Departure of Kelly Flinn Kelly J. Flinn, the Air Force’s first female bomber pilot, officially Flinn arrived at Minot in October 1995. In July 1996, she left Minot AFB, N.D., and the Air Force on May 29. The former began an affair with Marc Zigo, the base’s civilian soccer coach, first lieutenant had received notice on May 22 that USAF had who was married to Amn. Gayla A. Zigo. (Marc Zigo later said denied her request for resignation with an honorable discharge he lied when he told Flinn he was legally separated from his in lieu of court-martial. Instead she received a general discharge. wife and had filed for divorce.) The former B-52 copilot was charged with adultery, frater- Meanwhile, Zigo’s wife found a love letter from Flinn nization, lying to investigators, and disobeying a direct order. and confronted Zigo, who told her Flinn was stalking him. Air Force Secretary Sheila E. Widnall had forestalled Flinn’s A noncommissioned officer talked with Flinn on behalf of May 20 court-martial by taking up a review of her request for Gayla Zigo. resignation in what had become a politically charged case. In November, the service began its investigation of Flinn’s USAF Chief of Staff Gen. Ronald R. Fogleman, responding relationship with Zigo, which had come to light during another to Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) during a hearing on the Air Force unrelated investigation. At that point—according to Flinn, who budget on May 21, reminded Senators that Congress had es- thought Zigo intended to marry her after his divorce—she tablished the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He emphasized, and Zigo agreed not to tell investigators about their affair. “This is not an issue of adultery. This is an issue about an of- Unknown to Flinn, Zigo instead gave them a written state- ficer who is entrusted to fly nuclear weapons who disobeyed ment with complete details. At about the same time, Gayla an order, who lied. That’s what this is about.” Zigo accused Marc Zigo of involvement with a third woman From the beginning, the Flinn case was headline news. Her and told him to move out. She filed for divorce. Zigo moved supporters, including some members of Congress, keyed on in with Flinn after he supposedly attempted suicide and said the adultery issue, with many labeling the military as being out he couldn’t live without Flinn. of touch with reality and with some even claiming gender dis- In December, Flinn’s squadron commander issued Flinn a crimination. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) claimed written order to stay away from Marc Zigo. Flinn chose to ignore Flinn was being singled out and should receive an honorable the order. She told the New York Times she had decided to try discharge. Many female lawmakers took the position that the to salvage her relationship with Zigo. military unfairly targeted women. In January, the Air Force filed its charges against Flinn. However, the numbers do not support that argument. Last Investigators showed her the file of statements made by year alone, the Air Force court-martialed 60 men and seven Zigo.
Recommended publications
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • Cradle of Airpower Education
    Cradle of Airpower Education Maxwell Air Force Base Centennial April 1918 – April 2018 A Short History of The Air University, Maxwell AFB, and the 42nd Air Base Wing Air University Directorate of History March 2019 1 2 Cradle of Airpower Education A Short History of The Air University, Maxwell AFB, and 42nd Air Base Wing THE INTELLECTUAL AND LEADERSHIP- DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE US AIR FORCE Air University Directorate of History Table of Contents Origins and Early Development 3 The Air Corps Tactical School Period 3 Maxwell Field during World War II 4 Early Years of Air University 6 Air University during the Vietnam War 7 Air University after the Vietnam War 7 Air University in the Post-Cold War Era 8 Chronology of Key Events 11 Air University Commanders and Presidents 16 Maxwell Post/Base Commanders 17 Lineage and Honors: Air University 20 Lineage and Honors: 42nd Bombardment Wing 21 “Be the intellectual and leadership-development center of the Air Force Develop leaders, enrich minds, advance airpower, build relationships, and inspire service.” 3 Origins and Early Development The history of Maxwell Air Force Base began with Orville and Wilbur Wright, who, following their 1903 historic flight, decided in early 1910 to open a flying school to teach people how to fly and to promote the sale of their airplane. After looking at locations in Florida, Wilbur came to Montgomery, Alabama in February 1910 and decided to open the nation’s first civilian flying school on an old cotton plantation near Montgomery that subsequently become Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB).
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Air Force Base
    PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TULLAHOMA TN Vol. 68, No. 8 Arnold AFB, Tenn. PERMIT NO. 29 April 19, 2021 AEDC critical to fielding DARPA OpFires By Bradley Hicks hypersonic boost glide weap- methodology to collect the AEDC Public Affairs ons to penetrate modern en- required data. All objectives emy air defenses and rapidly were met,” said Lt. Col. John Critical testing for a De- and precisely engage critical McShane, director of the fense Advanced Research time-sensitive targets. AEDC Flight Systems Com- Projects Agency program was The objective of the test- bined Test Force. “The data recently completed in Arnold ing in VKF was to determine collected at AEDC is essential Engineering Development the stability and control char- to the rapid development of Complex test facilities. acteristics for the OpFires hypersonic weapon systems This testing supported the weapon system across the and providing DOD leader- DARPA Operational Fires, or hypersonic envelope. Aero- ship decision-quality infor- OpFires, program, and was dynamic data on multiple mation prior to flight test and completed in October 2020 in configurations of the test ar- fielding.” the von Kármán Gas Dynam- ticle were evaluated across a The 2018 National De- Testing for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ics Facility (VKF) at AEDC. range of Mach and Reynolds fense Strategy requires that Operational Fires program was recently completed in the Ar- The goal of the OpFires Numbers at various incidence the DOD provide combat- nold Engineering Development Complex von Kármán Gas Dy- program is to develop and angles. credible military forces to namics Facility, or VKF, at Arnold Air Force Base.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Meritorious Service Medal (Military)
    MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL (MILITARY) To Foreign Officers 2012 to 2021 Updated: 22 May 2021 Current to: 04 July 2020 CG and CanForGen November 2020 #144/20 Pages: 41 Prepared By: John Blatherwick, CM, CStJ, OBC, CD, MD, FRCP(C), LLD(Hon) =================================================================================================== Page CG or CanForGen Name Rank Unit Decoration 26 27/04/2016a BALDUCCHI, Christophe Antoine Marie Captain French Navy – Attaché MSM 16 24/06/2015a BEAUREGARD, Douglas CPO US Navy – Cyber Support MSM 09 22/02/2014 BRIGGS II, Jack L. BGen US Air Force MSM 25 27/04/2016a BUSHONG, Paul VAdm US Navy MSM 16 24/06/2015a DOCKTER, Bryan Major US Air Force CC-130J MSM 41 17/12/2020cfg DODU, Petru Eduard Commander Romanian Air Force MSM 17 14/11/2015 DUBIE, Michael D. LGen US Air Force NORAD MSM 08 01/07/2013a HABIBI, Ahmad BGen Afghanistan Army MSM 13 20/02/2014a HABIB HESARI, Mohammad MGen Afghanistan Army Training MSM 28 17/06/2017 HARMON, Jessica Captain US Army MSM 02 08/12/2012 HAUSMANN, Jeffrey Allen Colonel US Air Force MSM 40 01/11/2020cfg HEISNER, Aslak Colonel German Amry – Mali MSM 20 14/11/2015 HYDE, Charles Kevin BGen US Air Force D/Cdr 1 CAD MSM 13 20/02/2014a KARIMI, Sher Mohammad General Afghanistan Army COS MSM 37 26/08/2019a KSOK, Kamil Captain Polish Army – Tank Cdr MSM 09 10/09/2013a LEONARD, Dene Major US Army MSM 12 22/02/2014 LITTERINI, Norman Peter Colonel US Army D/COS CEFC MSM 32 11/11/2018 MANSKE, Chad Thomas BGen US Air Force D/Cdr 1 CAD MSM 14 29/04/2014a MERCIER, Denis General French Air Force COS MSM 13 20/02/2014a MERZAHI, Sayed Sgt-Major Afghanistan Army MSM 03 08/12/2012 MILLER, Christopher D.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Defense Posture, 1783–2011
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. U.S. Global Defense Posture, 1783–2011 Stacie L. Pettyjohn Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited PROJECT AIR FORCE The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2020-2 27
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2020-2 27 Jan - 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey System to Assess Abuse and Misconduct Toward Air Force Students in Occupational Specialty Training
    C O R P O R A T I O N A Survey System to Assess Abuse and Misconduct Toward Air Force Students in Occupational Specialty Training Laura L. Miller, Coreen Farris, Marek N. Posard, Miriam Matthews, Kirsten M. Keller, Sean Robson, Stephanie Brooks Holliday, Mauri Matsuda, Rachel M. Burns, Lisa Wagner, Barbara Bicksler For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2692 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0203-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents a RAND Corporation study designed to adapt a survey system for monitoring abuse and misconduct in the Air Force Basic Military Training (BMT) environment to extend it to the next stages of the Air Force technical training and flying training environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Edge
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE MAJOR GENERAL KENNETH T. BIBB JR. Maj. Gen. Kenneth T. Bibb Jr. is the Commander, 18th Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. As Air Mobility Command’s sole numbered air force, 18th Air Force ensures readiness and sustainment of approximately 36,000 active duty, Air Force Reserve and civilian Airmen at 12 wings and one stand-alone group. With more than 400 aircraft, 18th AF supports AMC’s worldwide mission of providing rapid global mobility to America’s armed forces through airlift, aerial refueling and aeromedical evacuation. Maj. Gen. Bibb received his commission from the United States Air Force Academy in 1991. He is a command pilot with more than 5,000 hours in the C-5, C-12, C-17, C-21, T-37, T-38 and KC-135. He has commanded at the squadron and wing levels. As a general officer, he was the Commander, 618th Air Operations Center (Tanker Airlift Control Center). Prior to his current assignment, he was Director, Air Space and Cyberspace Operations, and later Director, Strategic Plans, Programs, Requirements, and Analyses, Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. EDUCATION 1991 Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colo. 1996 Master of Aeronautical Science, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide 1997 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. 2003 Air Command and Staff College, Maxwell AFB, Ala., by correspondence 2004 Masters of Science, Aeronautical Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 2007 Air War College, Montgomery, Ala., by correspondence 2012 Senior Course, NATO Defense College, Rome 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS in Defense Installation and Environmental Management
    GIS in Defense Installation and Environmental Management Dear Colleagues: The installations and environment (I&E) community was one of the first to use geographic information system (GIS) technology in the defense sector, so I have a particular fondness for the work you do. You have consistently led the way in implement- ing GIS to help effectively manage and administer stewardship of lands and property. The I&E community manages a complex array of problems; indeed, your work could be equated to that of a medium- A Letter from JackA Letter from sized city, except you look after everything: the environment, facilities management, land-use planning, utilities, emergency response, and security. Your GIS implementations are truly world class in scope. These stories detailing your work were first published in the GIS in the Defense and Intelligence Community series. We are recompiling the articles in a focused I&E publication because they communicate a powerful evolution in GIS deployment. The defense I&E community has gone from implementing GIS in stand-alone desktop applications to developing department- wide and installation-wide geospatial applications. You are now building a defensewide Installations Spatial Data Infrastructure. The impact of your work extends beyond defense and demonstrates pioneering models for global collaboration of spatial data. I want to use this opportunity to thank you for the work you do—it is very important. Warm regards, Jack Dangermond Installation and Environment U.S. Air Force GeoBase One Installation...One Map Installation and Environment Installation GIS links graphic features (entities) to tabular data (attributes). Air Force basing operations, whether at home or abroad, have relied on civil engineers to respond especially when the mission called for a map.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Major Commands
    USAF Major Commands Cognitive Lesson Objective: • Know the mission and organization of Air Combat Command (ACC), Air Mobility Command (AMC), Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), Air Education and Training Command (AETC), Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC), Pacific Air Force (PACAF), United States Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa (USAFE-AFAFRICA), and Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC). Cognitive Sample of Behavior: • State the mission of ACC, AMC, AFSPC, AETC, AFMC, AFSOC, AFRC, PACAF, USAFE, and AFGSC. Affective Lesson Objective: • Respond to the importance of ACC, AMC, AFSPC, AETC, AFMC, AFSOC, AFRC, PACAF, USAFE, and AFGSC to achieving US national objectives. Affective Sample of Behavior: • Willingly read the assigned text. USAF Major Commands 227 USAF MAJOR COMMANDS ur National military policy is based primarily on deterrence. In the event deterrence fails, we must execute the war swiftly and decisively. The United States must be Oprepared to fight conflicts across all spectrums and in all arenas. The Air Force, through Air Combat Command (ACC), is prepared to provide combat aircraft for these conflicts. ACC doesn’t act alone. Throughout the post-Cold War era, airlift has been at the center of military operations ranging from the massive airlift during DESERT SHIELD to airlift support for OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM and IRAQI FREEDOM. Air Mobility Command (AMC) lies at the heart of the Air Force’s airlift capability and is critical to our national security. Both ACC and AMC rely heavily on another command, Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), to accomplish their mission.
    [Show full text]