DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Norwegian Democracy Support Via Political Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Norwegian Democracy Support Via Political Parties NIBR-report 2014:22 Einar Braathen Jørn Holm-Hansen Review of Norwegian democracy support via political parties Review of Norwegian democracy support via political parties Andre publikasjoner fra NIBR: NIBR Report 2009:19 Henningsen, E. & Braathen, E. (2009): “Norwegian party assistance in Tanzania”. Rapportene koster fra kr 250,- til kr 350,-og kan bestilles fra NIBR: Gaustadalléen 21 0349 Oslo Tlf. 22 95 88 00 Faks 22 60 77 74 E-post til [email protected] Publikasjonene kan også skrives ut fra www.nibr.no Porto kommer i tillegg til de oppgitte prisene Einar Braathen Jørn Holm-Hansen Review of Norwegian democracy support via political parties NIBR-rapport 2014:22 Title: Review of Norwegian democracy support via political parties Author: Einar Braathen and Jørn Holm-Hansen NIBR Report: 2014:22 ISSN: 1502-9794 ISBN: 978-82-8309-040-6 Project number: 3344 Project name: Review of Norwegian democracy support via political parties Financial supporter: Norad Head of project: Einar Braathen Abstract: The Norwegian scheme for democracy support through the political parties aims to contribute to democratic and well-functioning party organizations in developing countries. After having been administered by the parties themselves through a centre for democracy support since 2002 the scheme came under the Norwegian agency for development support – Norad – in 2011. The present Review takes stock of the operation and results of the current scheme and provides a set of recommendations for its future. Summary: English Date: November 2014 Pages: 86 Publisher:: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research Gaustadalléen 21 0349 OSLO Telephone (+47) 22 95 88 00 Telefax (+47) 22 60 77 74 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.nibr.no Printed: X-ide Org. no. NO 970205284 MVA © NIBR 2014 1 Preface This review was commissioned by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad). A NIBR team led by Einar Braathen has earlier published an evaluation of the Norwegian Centre for Democracy Support (Norad Report 2010). That evaluation formed the basis for the current review. This time Einar Braathen (project leader) and Jørn Holm-Hansen carried out all the work in Oslo including several face-to face interviews with representatives of Norwegian political parties and Norad, in addition to telephone interviews with partners and experts abroad. The Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research would like to thank all those having shared their time, information and insights with the Review Team. Everybody has been very helpful. Vigdis Halvorsen, Svein Bæra and other staff in the Civil Society Department of Norad have been of great help to the Review Team by discussing very openly and sharing their reflections. Norad has also facilitated interviews with the Norwegian political parties and provided necessary documentation. Thanks to secretary Inger Balberg at NIBR for her contribution to the technical edition of this report. Oslo, November 2014 Geir Heierstad Research Director NIBR Report 2014:22 2 Table of Contents Preface ...................................................................................................... 1 Tables ....................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................ 5 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 10 1.1 On democracy support via political parties ................. 10 1.2 On democracy support via Norwegian political parties ................................................................................ 10 1.3 Aims of the review .......................................................... 12 1.4 The review approach ...................................................... 13 1.5 Methods applied for the review .................................... 14 2 The projects 2011-14 and their results ...................................... 16 2.1 The Norwegian political parties and their projects ............................................................................. 16 2.1.1 Arbeiderpartiet (Norwegian Labour Party) ................. 17 2.1.2 AUF (Labour Youth/The Workers’ Youth League).............................................................................. 20 2.1.3 Høyre (Conservative Party) ........................................... 21 2.1.4 The Christian Democrats (KrF Norway) .................... 24 2.1.5 Young Christian Democrats (KrFU) ........................... 27 2.1.6 Senterpartiet (The Centre Party) ................................... 30 2.1.7 Sosialistisk Venstreparti (Socialist Left Party) ............. 32 2.1.8 Venstre (Liberal Party) ................................................... 35 2.2 Joint assessment of the projects .................................... 36 2.2.1 Norwegian parties’ knowledge of the country contexts............................................................................. 36 2.2.2 Capability to strengthen competence within partner organizations ...................................................... 38 2.2.3 Capability to embed the projects within the organizations .................................................................... 38 2.2.4 Sustainability and cost efficiency of the projects ........ 39 2.2.5 Contribution to democratic party organizations ........ 40 NIBR Report 2014:22 3 2.2.6 The developmental-managerial capacity of the Norwegian parties ........................................................... 42 3 Arrangements of democracy support ........................................ 44 3.1 Assessment of the Norad-administered arrangement for political parties ................................... 44 3.1.1 The purpose and design of the arrangement (the Guidelines) ....................................................................... 44 3.1.2 Norad’s technical and administrative handling of the arrangement: ......................................................... 45 3.2 What has changed since NDS was closed down? ...... 46 3.2.1 The basic project approach of the Norwegian parties ................................................................................ 47 3.2.2 Partner choice and partner relationships ..................... 48 3.2.3 Project design .................................................................. 48 3.2.4 Lasting effects? ................................................................ 49 3.3 Experiences internationally ............................................ 49 3.3.1 A brief overview of the current academic and professional debate ......................................................... 50 3.3.2 The Netherlands - NIMD.............................................. 53 3.3.3 Sweden – PAOs .............................................................. 54 3.3.4 Finland - Demo ............................................................... 56 3.3.5 Denmark - DIPD ............................................................ 57 3.3.6 International experiences relevant for Norway .......... 59 3.4 Other forms of Norwegian democracy support ......... 60 3.5 Three scenarios for the future arrangement ................ 61 3.5.1 Discontinuation ............................................................... 61 3.5.2 Continuation .................................................................... 63 3.5.3 Redesign ........................................................................... 64 4 Conclusions and recommendations ........................................... 68 4.1 The projects ..................................................................... 68 4.2 The arrangement ............................................................. 70 4.3 Recommendations .......................................................... 72 References and documents consulted ............................................... 76 Appendix 1 Interview guide ................................................................ 78 Appendix 2 List of interviews ............................................................. 84 NIBR Report 2014:22 4 Tables Table 2.1 Norwegian democracy support via political parties, 2013 ..................................................................... 16 Table 3.1 Swedish democracy support via party-affiliated organisations (PAOs), 2013 ........................................... 56 Table 3.2 Size and forms of democracy support via political parties, five donor countries .......................................... 59 NIBR Report 2014:22 5 Executive Summary Einar Braathen and Jørn Holm-Hansen Review of Norwegian democracy support via political parties NIBR Report 2014:22 The Norwegian scheme for democracy support through the political parties aims to contribute to democratic and well- functioning party organizations in developing countries. After having been administered by the parties themselves through a centre for democracy support since 2002 the scheme came under the Norwegian agency for development support – Norad – in 2011. The present Review takes stock of the operation and results of the current scheme and provides a set of recommendations for its future. The scheme is small. Only around eight million Norwegian kroner have been allocated annually. Still parts of the annual sum remain unused every year because project proposals do not pass the quality control carried out by the Norwegian agency for development cooperation. Prior to 2011 the parties submitted their project applications to the centre for democracy support and a board of party representatives
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media
    Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Nune Grigoryan August 2019 © 2019 Nune Grigoryan. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media by NUNE GRIGORYAN has been approved for the School of Media Arts & Studies and the Scripps College of Communication by Wolfgang Suetzl Assistant Professor of Media Arts & Studies Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii Abstract GRIGORYAN, NUNE, PhD, August 2019, Mass Communication Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media Director of dissertation: Wolfgang Suetzl Democracy allows a plural media landscape where different types of media perform vital functions. Over years, the public trust towards mainstream media has been eroding, limiting their ability to fulfill democratic functions within the American society. Meanwhile, the Internet has led to proliferation of alternative media outlets on digital space. These platforms allow new outreach and mobilizing opportunities to the once peripheral alternative media. So far, the literature about alternative media have been heavily focused on left-wing alternative media outlets, while the research on alternative right-wing media has remained scarce and fragmented. Only few studies have applied a comparative analysis approach to study these outlets. Moreover, research that examines different aspects of alternative media such as content and audience reception is more rare. This study aims to demonstrate the heterogeneity of alternative media by highlighting their history and functions within the American democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 U N I V E R S I T Y of M a C E D O N I a Department of BALKAN, SLAVIC & ORIENTAL STUDIES
    U N I V E R S I T Y OF M A C E D O N I A Department of BALKAN, SLAVIC & ORIENTAL STUDIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MASTER in POLITICS & ECONOMICS OF CONTEMPORARY EASTERN AND SOUTH - EASTERN EUROPE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dissertation By: Grigorios Sismanidis Postgraduate Student Advisor: Professor Nikolaos Marantzidis Thessalonica, Feb 06 th , 2012 1 University of Macedonia Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studi Advisor: Professor Nikolaos Marantzidis «The Evolution of Extreme Right in Eastern and Southeastern Europe» Sismanidis Grigorios Post Graduate Student Thessalonica, Feb 06 th , 2012 2 THE EVOLUTION OF EXTREME RIGHT IN EASTERN AND SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………p.4 II.DEFINITIONS OF THE EXTREME RIGHT PARTIES…………………..p.5 III. EXTREME RIGHT PARTIES OF EASTERN AND SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE………………………….p.13. IV.REASONS OF THE ELECTORAL SUCCESS OR DEFEAT OF THE EXTREME RIGHT PARTIES………………p. 21 V. THE DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WESTERN AND EASTERN EUROPEAN EXTREME RIGHT PARTIES…………….p.28 VI. CONCLUSION……………………………p.40 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………p.41 ANNEXES………………..p.48 3 I. INTRODUCTION Over the years there has been an effort to try and identify the components and the core ideas representing the extreme right. Many essays have been written on the subject and all of them tried to approach it from a different perspective. Still no –one has been
    [Show full text]
  • Extremism and Its Development in the Czech Republic in 2001
    RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC CONTENTS Extremism and its Development in the Czech Republic in 2001 1. Introduction 1 2. Term Definition 1 3. Extremism and its Development in the Czech Republic in 2001 4 3.1 General Characteristics 4 3.2 Right-Wing Extremist Scene 5 3.2.1 Open Neo-Nazi and Fascist Organisations and Associations 6 3.2.2 Organisations Registered or Applying for Registration with the Ministry of the Interior 11 3.3 The Left-wing Extremist Scene 25 3.3.1 - 25 3.3.2 Neo-Bolshevik and Pan-Slavonic Groups and Organisations 36 3.4 Prague NATO Summit in November 2002 44 3.5 Dangerous Sects and Pseudo-religious Organisations 46 3.6 Terrorism as a Potential Means of Achieving Extremist Objectives 48 3.7 Notes to a Relation of Some Subcultures to Extremist Manifestations 48 4. Crimes Having an Extremist Context 54 4.1 Background 54 4.2 The Most Important Cases from the Point of View of the Police of the Czech Republic 56 4.3 Typical Features of Crimes with an Extremist Context 57 4.4 Extremist Crimes in Individual Regions 58 5. The Extremist Scene in the Central European Geopolitical Area 68 5.1 Right-wing Extremist Spectrum 69 5.2 Left-wing Extremist Spectrum 74 5.3 The Issue of Dangerous Sects and Pseudo-religious Organisations 76 5.4 Modern Technology and Extremists in 2001 76 5. Evaluation of the Czech Republic in the International 1 6.Forum in 1999 in Terms of Quality in Combating Racism and Anti-Semitism 77 6.1 Activities of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 77 6.2 Evaluation of the Czech Republic by International Organisations from a Perspective of its Observation of Human Rights 82 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right Alternative? Assessing the Case for the Alternative Vote
    REPORT The Right Alternative? Assessing the case for the Alternative Vote Guy Lodge and Glenn Gottfried April 2011 © ippr 2011 Institute for Public Policy Research Challenging ideas – Changing policy About ippr The Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) is the UK’s leading progressive think tank, producing cutting-edge research and innovative policy ideas for a just, democratic and sustainable world. Since 1988, we have been at the forefront of progressive debate and policymaking in the UK. Through our independent research and analysis we define new agendas for change and provide practical solutions to challenges across the full range of public policy issues. With offices in both London and Newcastle, we ensure our outlook is as broad-based as possible, while our international work extends our partnerships and influence beyond the UK, giving us a truly world-class reputation for high-quality research. ippr, 4th Floor, 13–14 Buckingham Street, London WC2N 6DF +44 (0)20 7470 6100 • [email protected] • www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in April 2011. © 2011 The contents and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors only. About the authors Guy Lodge is Associate Director for Politics and Power at ippr. Glenn Gottfried is a research fellow at ippr. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Sarah Birch, John Curtice, Iain McLean, and Alan Renwick for responding to various queries relating to AV. Like others who have looked at this debate we are enormously grateful to the work of David Sanders, Harold Clarke, Marianne Stewart and Paul Whiteley, who lead the research team for the British Election Study and who produced the most accurate and detailed AV simulation for the 2010 election.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the Issue of Extremism in the Czech Republic in 2005
    MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC Security Policy Department INFORMATION ON THE ISSUE OF EXTREMISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2005 Prague 2006 Information on the Issue of Extremism in the Czech Republic in 2005 was presented to the Government of the Czech Republic in the Autonomous Annex to the Report on Public Order and Internal Security in the Czech Republic in 2005 (The Resolution of the Government of the Czech Republic No 438 dated 19 April 2006 concerning the Report on Public Order and Internal Security in the Czech Republic in 2005). The submitted Information on the Issue of Extremism in the Czech Republic in 2005 follows up the previous independent governmental reports dealing with this phenomenon. INFORMATION ON THE ISSUE OF EXTREMISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 II. The Situation in the Czech Republic in 2005 2 2.1 The Issue of Extremism in the Czech Republic 2005 3 III. The Issue of Extremism in the Czech Republic in 2005 3 3.1 Brief Characteristics of the Extremist Scene 3 3.1.1 Right-Wing Extremism 3 3.1.1.1 The Neo-Nazi Scene 3 3.1.1.2 Nationalistic Groups 4 3.1.2 Left-Wing Extremism 6 3.1.2.1 Anarcho-Autonomous Movement 6 3.1.2.2 Marxist-Leninist Groups and Trotskyist Groups 7 3.2 Crimes Having an Extremist Context 8 3.2.1 The Situation Republic-Wide and in Individual Regions of the Czech Republic 8 3.2.2 The Most Serious Cases from the Point of View of the Czech Police 9 3.2.3 The Issue of Anti-Semitism, Denying the Holocaust (Shoa) 10 3.2.4 The Issue of Concerts of Right-Wing Extremist Music Bands 10 3.2.5 Misuse of the Internet 11 3.2.6 Criminal Activities Related to Spectator Violence 12 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heartland of the PVV
    The heartland of the PVV An overall examination of the electoral success of the PVV in the province of Limburg M. C. N. P. Dinjens Master’s thesis Comparative Politics Radboud University Nijmegen August 7, 2012 Supervisor: dr. A. Zaslove Foreword and acknowledgements I had no trouble deciding what to write my Master’s thesis about. Ever since the electoral success of the radical right populist party the PVV in the province of Limburg – the region where I grew up and lived for several years - people have been asking me about explanations for this phenomenon. Although speculations are numerous, I never managed to present a clear-cut answer. Since the elections of 2010 Limburg is seen as a bulwark of radical right voters1. Apparently, the electoral success of a radical right populist party is fascinating to a lot of people, not only to political scientists. Because of the numerous speculations and prejudices about the reasons for this electoral success, I decided to scientifically analyze the phenomenon. By doing this, I wanted to gain more knowledge on the situation of the PVV in Limburg, but also increase understanding of the factors that motivate people to vote for a radical right populist party in general. Although this thesis will not give a definitive and indisputable answer to my main question, it has made an important contribution to the knowledge about intra-country variation in radical right party success. Next to this scientific relevance it has strengthened my opinion that we have to take these parties and their voters seriously. I would also like to use this foreword to thank all people who have helped me during the thinking and writing process of my thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Za Sigurnosne Studije (Foss) Forum for Security Studies
    Forum za sigurnosne studije (FoSS) Forum for Security Studies Forum za sigurnosne studije izdavač: Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu – Centar za međunarodne i sigurnosne studije (CeMSS) za izdavača: prof.dr.sc. Zoran Kurelić glavna urednica: Ružica Jakešević izvršna urednica: Marta Zorko adresa uredništva Lepušićeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb tel: +385 1 4642 000 faks: +385 1 4655 316 e-mail: [email protected] uredništvo Robert Barić, Centar za obrambene i strateške studije GSOSRH, Zagreb Slavko Barić, Hrvatsko vojno učilište “Dr. Franjo Tuđman,” Zagreb Goran Bašić, Institut društvenih znanosti, Beograd Vlatko Cvrtila, Veleučilište VERN, Zagreb Nemanja Džuverović, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Beogradu Anton Grizold, Fakultet društvenih znanosti Sveučilišta u Ljubljani Ružica Jakešević, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Damir Kapidžić, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Sarajevu Lidija Kos-Stanišić, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Đana Luša, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Dario Malnar, Ured Vijeća za nacionalnu sigurnost, Zagreb Robert Mikac, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Mirza Smajić, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Sarajevu Tibor Szvircsev Tresch, Švicarska vojna akademija Siniša Tatalović, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Vladimir Vuletić, Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Beogradu Marta Zorko, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Mitja Žagar, Fakultet društvenih znanosti Sveučilišta u Ljubljani dizajn: Ruta lektura i korektura: Ružica Jakešević i Marta Zorko tisak: Tiskara Zelina d.d. Časopis izlazi jednom godišnje. Cijena broja: 50,00 kuna Naklada: 150 Forum za sigurnosne studije (FoSS) Forum for Security Studies znanstveni godišnjak Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Centar za međunarodne i sigurnosne studije God. 2, br. 2, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kids Are Alt-Right: the Intellectual Origins of the Alt-Right
    The Kids are Alt-Right: The Intellectual Origins of the Alt-Right ANDREW WILLIAM JONES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2019 ©Andrew William Jones, 2019 Abstract The electoral success and increased media presence of the Far-Right ideology known as the Alternative Right has catapulted the once marginal fringe movement into popular political discourse. The term Alternative Right is used in contrast to Alt-Right, which is a specific subsection of the broader Alt-Right who are associated with Richard Spencer. This dissertation examines the theories that make up the Alternative Right by addressing the question: “How have the divergent political theory traditions of the Alternative Right coalesced into a new reactionary political ideology?”The first half of the dissertation defines the Alternative Right and the historical context for the movement. The dissertation defines the Alternative Right by its axioms of the right to difference, the primacy of cultural metapolitics and hierarchical individualism. The second half examines the four major intellectual influences of the Alternative Right: The Techno-libertarians know as the Grey Tribe, NeoReactionary Thought, the European New Right and the American White Nationalists. The dissertation concludes that the divergent political theory of the Alternative Right is unified based on its shared reactionary values, its break from American liberal- conservativism and a consistent focus on the literature of radicalization and critique. The goal of the Alternative Right is a rebirth of racial/gendered consciousness and a new American/European renaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tsveta Petrova Phd Student 214
    THE TWO FACES OF INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE Tsveta Petrova PhD Student 214 White Hall Department of Government Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 Tel: (607) 272-4559 Fax: (607) 255-5240 Email: [email protected] DRAFT: PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE OR CITE 1 THE TWO FACES OF INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE [PAPER ABSTRACT] The paper examines how international cooperation practices influence the policy-making processes in Central and Eastern Europe; the focus is on the consequences for the democratization projects of these states in general and in particular – for their elites’ autonomy. The analysis is based on a qualitative comparative study of the impact a security and an economic/governmental international organization, NATO and the EU, have had on two Central and East European countries – Poland and Romania – which were diametrically opposite with respect to their elites’ autonomy before the cooperation process began. The study traces the chronological development of the EU’s and NATO’s involvement in Central and Eastern Europe, focusing on the content of cooperation and how it impacts elite accountability and control. Furthermore, since international regimes could influence the way domestic forces exercise control over their elites, the paper also examines whether the institutionalization of the cooperation processes limits or encourages the elites’ autonomy by redistributing elites’ and domestic groups’ access to procedural and cognitive political resources. The procedural instruments examined include policy-making initiative and institutions,
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full PDF
    Job Name:2044532 Date:14-11-03 PDF Page:2044532pbc.p1.pdf Color: Black PANTONE 124 C The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, established in 1943, is a publicly supported, nonpartisan, research and educational organization. Its purpose is to assist policy makers, scholars, businessmen, the press, and the public by providing objective analysis of national and international issues. Views expressed in the institute's publications are those of the authors and do not neces­ sarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Council of Academic Advisers Paul W. McCracken, Chairman, Edmund Ezra Day University Professor of Busi­ ness Administration, University of Michigan Kenneth W. Dam, Harold 7. and Marion F. Green Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School Milton Friedman, Paul Snowden Russell Distinguished Service Professor of Eco­ nomics, University of Chicago ; Nobel Laureate in Economic Science Donald C. Hellmann, Professor of Political Science and Comparative and Foreign Area Studies, University of Washington D. Gale Johnson, Eliakim Hastings Moore Distinguished Service Professor of Economics and Provost, [lniversity of Chicago Robert A. Nisbet, Albert Schweitzer Professor of Humanities, Columbia University G. Warren Nutter, Paul Goodloe McIntire Professor of Economics, University of Virginia Marina v. N. Whitman, Distinguished Public Service Professor of Economics, Uni­ versity of Pittsburgh James Q. Wilson, Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Government, Harvard University Executive Committee Herman J. Schmidt, Chairman of the Board Richard J. Farrell William J. Baroody, Jr., President Richard B. Madden Charles T. Fisher III, Treasurer Richard D. Wood Gary L. Jones, Vice President, Edward Styles, Director of Administration Publications Program Directors Periodicals Russell Chapin, Legislative Analyses AEI Defense Review, Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2, 2016 Issn 1829-3824 2, 2016 Issn 1829-3824
    ISSN 1829-3824 2, 2016 EDITORIAL BOARD Honorary Chief of Ruben MIRZAKHANYAN - Rector of Khachatur Abovian Armenian State Pedagogical University, the Editorial Board Honorary Member of Armenian Philosophical Academy, Doctor of Sciences (in History), Professor Editor-in-Chief Hasmik HOVHANNISYAN - Full Member of the Armenian Philosophical Academy, Chairperson of the Department of Philosophy and Logic named after Academician Georg Brutian at Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khachatur Abovyan, Scientific General Secretary of the International Academy for Philosophy, Doctor of Sciences (in Philosophy) Phone: +374 10 597 065 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Associate Editor Hovhannes HOVHANNISYAN - Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Logic named after Academician Georg Brutian at Khachatur Abovian Armenian State Pedagogical University and the Yerevan State University, Scientific Secretary of the Armenian Philosophical Academy, Head of the Chair of Humanities and Social Sciences at French University of Armenia, Chairman of the Committee of Civil Society Development of Public Council of RA, PhD in philosophy Advisory Editors Georgia APOSTOLOPOULOU - Professor (Em.) of Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy at the University of Ioannina (Greece), Member of the International Academy for Philosophy Eduard DANIELYAN - Head of the Ancient History Department at the Institute of History and Archeology of NAS RA, Doctor of Sciences (in History), Professor Srbuhi GEVORGYAN - Vice-Rector
    [Show full text]
  • The First Global Financial Crisis of the 21St Century
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The first global financial crisis of the 21st century: Part II, June-December, 2008 Reinhart, Carmen and Felton, Andrew University of Maryland February 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45125/ MPRA Paper No. 45125, posted 16 Mar 2013 04:07 UTC The First Global Financial Crisis of the 21st Century Part II: June – December, 2008 A VoxEU.org Publication Edited by Andrew Felton and Carmen M. Reinhart 2 Preface................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 6 1. The spread of the crisis to the rest of the world.......................................................... 6 2. What is wrong with the traditional economic/financial viewpoint and models?........ 7 3. The proper governmental response............................................................................. 9 The spread of the crisis to the rest of the world................................................................ 11 Danielsson: The first casualty of the crisis: Iceland ..................................................... 11 Lane: Iceland: The future is in the EU.......................................................................... 15 Zoega: Iceland faces the music..................................................................................... 18 Buiter and Sibert: The collapse of Iceland’s banks: the predictable
    [Show full text]