DOCSLIB.ORG

Pulse and Their By-Products As Animal Feed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pulse and Their By-Products As Animal Feed FAO Pulses and their by-products as animal feed Pulses and their by-products Humans have been using pulses, and legumes Pulses also play an important role in providing in general, for millennia. Pulses currently valuable products for animal feeding and thus play a crucial role in sustainable development indirectly contribute to food security. Pulse Pulses and their by-products due to their nutritional, environmental and by-products are valuable sources of protein economic values. The United Nations General and energy for animals and they do not Assembly, at its 68th session, declared 2016 compete with human food. Available as animal feed as the International Year of Pulses to further information on this subject has been collated promote the use and value of these important and synthesized in this book, to highlight the crops. Pulses are an affordable source of nutritional role of pulses and their by-products protein, so their share in the total protein as animal feed. This publication is one of consumption in some developing countries the main contributions to the legacy of the ranges between 10 and 40 percent. Pulses, International Year of Pulses. It aims to enhance like legumes in general, have the important the use of pulses and their by-products in ability of biologically fixing nitrogen and those regions where many pulse by-products some of them are able to utilize soil-bound are simply dumped and will be useful for phosphorus, thus they can be considered the extension workers, researchers, feed industry, cornerstone of sustainable agriculture. policy-makers and donors alike. Pulses and their by-products as animal feed by P.L. SHERASIA, M.R. GARG & B.M. BHANDERI Animal Nutrition Group, National Dairy Development Board, Anand, India Edited by TEODARDO CALLES Plant Production and Protection Division (AGP) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy and HARINDER P.S. MAKKAR Animal Production and Health Division (AGA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2017 Recommended citation: Sharasia, P. L., Garg, M. R. & Bhanderi, B. M. 2017. Pulses and their by-products as animal feed, edited by T. Calles & H. P. S. Makkar. Rome, FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of AOF . ISBN: 978-92-5-109915-5 © FAO, 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights, should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to copyright@ fao.org FAO information products are available on the FAO Website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. iii Contents Foreword v Acknowledgements vii Glossary ix Abbreviations and acronyms xiii 1. Introduction 1 2. Beans 7 2.1 Common bean 9 2.2 Lima bean 15 2.3 Scarlet runner bean 19 2.4 Tepary bean 21 2.5 Adzuki bean 23 2.6 Mung bean 25 2.7 Mungo bean 31 2.8 Rice bean 37 2.9 Moth bean 43 3. Broad bean 55 4. Pulses nes 67 4.1 Hyacinth bean 67 4.2 Jack bean 77 4.3 Winged bean 83 4.4 Guar bean 89 4.5 Velvet bean 97 4.6 African yam bean 109 5. Bambara bean 115 6. Pea 123 7. Chickpea 131 8. Cowpea 141 9. Pigeon pea 153 10. Lentil 163 iv 11. Common vetch 171 12. Lupins 179 13. A synthesis 191 APPENDIXES A. Major international research centres working on various pulse crops 203 B. Global production of major pulse crops 204 v Foreword The pulse sector is undergoing dynamic changes at global, regional and country levels, to meet the growing demand for protein. Projections indicate that demand for pulses will continue to increase in developing counties due to growing population and rising per capita incomes. Globally, the average share of pulses is only 5 percent of the total protein consumption, but in several developing countries their contribution ranges between 10 and 40 percent. Pulses are an important crop group in the cropping patterns of several developing countries. They are of particular importance for food and nutrition security, particularly in low-income countries. In these countries they are the major source of protein often consumed in the diet along with staples like wheat or rice. Pulses help to improve nutrition and thus health and contribute to reduce poverty and hunger. Moreover, pulses – and legume crops in general – are key components of sustainable, climate-resilient cropping systems. Pulses further play an important role in providing valuable by-products for animal feeding and thus indirectly contribute to food security. There is considerable potential to use crop by-products (e.g. straw and other plant parts) left after harvesting the seeds as ruminant feed. Other by-products such as chunies (a mix of seed coats and endosperm fractions) and husks, obtained during processing of pulses for human consumption, are also good animal feeds. These by-products are valuable sources of protein and energy. They do not compete with human food, but contribute to decreasing cereals and soybean levels in the diets of livestock in intensive livestock production systems. They are used by smallholder farmers, particularly in Asia, in extensive or mixed crop-livestock production systems to extenuate the feed shortage. Also their feeding provides important economic, social and environmental benefits by saving grains used for feeding for animals. There have been considerable research efforts on the use of pulses and their by-products as animal feed, which has resulted in a large body of published and unpublished data. However, an authoritative review in this area has been lacking. In order to fill this gap and to raise awareness on the use of pulses and their by-products as animal feed, we have collated and synthesized the available information in this comprehensive state-of-the- art document. It highlights the nutritional role of pulses and pulse by-products as animal feed and is a contribution to the legacy IZSA © FAO/FERENC vi of the 2016 International Year of Pulses. This document will further enhance the use of these feed resources in other continents, besides Asia, where many pulse by-products are simply dumped. It is also expected that the synthesis presented contributes to make the use of pulses and their by-products as animal feed more efficient. This document will be useful for extension workers, researchers, feed industry, policy-makers and donors alike. Hans Dreyer Berhe Tekola Director Director Plant Production and Protection Division Animal Production and Health Division Food and Agriculture Organization Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations vii Acknowledgements The authors thank the management of the National Dairy Development Board of India for granting permission to take up this assignment. The editors thank the Secretariat and Steering Committee of the International Year of Pulses for the support given to this publication. Financial support of the Global Pulses Confederation (GPC), the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock of the Republic of Turkey, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and Fertitecnica Colfiorito is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Dr Athanasios Tsivelikas from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Dr Daniel Debouck from the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and Dr Michael Abberton and Olaniyi Oyatomi from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) for providing some of the pictures used in this publication. We would like to express our gratitude to Claudia Ciarlantini, Claudia Nicolai, Diana Gutiérrez, Michela Baratelli, Pedro Javaloyes, Riccardo del Castello and many others who have helped in preparing this publication. The authors would like to thank the three anonymous peer reviewers, who made important suggestions for improving the final manuscript. The authors and editors would like to thank Thorgeir Lawrence for final editing to conform to FAO editorial style, Chrissi Redfern for laying out the document and Fabrizio Puzzilli for designing the cover. ix Glossary Ad libitum. Unrestricted consumption of feed or water. Anti-nutritional factors. Anti-nutritional factors are substances that when present in animal feed or water reduce the availability of one or more nutrients. As fed. As consumed by the animal. Bran. Refers to the pericarp or outer coarse coat of the grain, which is removed during processing. Chuni. It consists primarily of the broken pieces of endosperm, including germ and a portion of husks obtained as a by-product during the processing of pulse grains for human consumption. The compound is valued as a concentrate feed, as it is comparatively low in fibre and high in energy and protein contents in comparison with roughages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women a Guide to Measurement
    FANTA III FOOD AND NUTRITION TECHNICAL A SSISTANCE Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women A Guide to Measurement Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women A Guide to Measurement Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and USAID’s Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA), managed by FHI 360 Rome, 2016 Recommended citation: FAO and FHI 360. 2016. Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women: A Guide for Measurement. Rome: FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or of FANTA/FHI 360 concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO, or FHI 360 in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Additional funding for this publication was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the support of the Office of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under terms of Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-12-00005 through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA), managed by FHI 360. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO, FHI 360, UC Davis, USAID or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional and Technological Properties of Tepary Bean (Phaseolus Acutifolius) Cultivated in Mexican Northeast
    Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 37, 2019 (1): 62–68 https://doi.org/10.17221/331/2017-CJFS Nutritional and technological properties of Tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) cultivated in Mexican Northeast Laura Heredia-Rodríguez1, Marcela Gaytán-Martínez2, Eduardo Morales-Sánchez3, Aurora de Jesús Garza-Juárez1, Vania Urias- Orona1, Blanca Edelia González-Martínez1, Manuel López-Cabanillas Lomelí 1, Jesús Alberto Vázquez-Rodríguez1* 1Research Center in Nutrition and Public Health, Public Health and Nutrition Faculty, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico 2Research and Graduate Studies in Food Science, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónomade Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico 3CICATA-IPN, Queretaro Unit, Instituto Politenico Nacional, Querétaro, Mexico *Corresponding author: [email protected] Citation: Heredia-Rodríguez L., Gaytán-Martínez M., Morales-Sánchez E., Garza-Juárez A.J., Urias-Orona V., González- -Martínez B.E., López-Cabanillas Lomelí M., Vázquez-Rodríguez J.A. (2018): Nutritional and technological properties of Te- pary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) cultivated in Mexican Northeast. Czech J. Food Sci., 37: 62–68. Abstract: The nutritional, cooking and technological properties of the Tepary bean (TB) cultivated in Mexican nor- theast comparing to two common beans varieties (Pinto Americano and Black Jamapa) were evaluated in this study. Nutritional parameters evaluated of TB resulted significantly different from common beans varieties analysed, except lipid fraction. Cooking times of soaked (4 and 8 h) and non-soaked varieties varied significantly; TB shows between 55.1–80.49 min by cooking time. The textural profile analysis (TPA) of TB showed a significant reduction of hard- ness, chewiness and adhesiveness in soaked compared to non-soaked. In addition, TB presented a similar behaviour to Pinto Americano in TPA non-soaked and cooked and soaked 8h and cooked, except to adhesiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Microstructural Differences Among Adzuki Bean (Vigna Angularis) Cultivars
    Food Structure Volume 11 Number 2 Article 9 1992 Microstructural Differences Among Adzuki Bean (Vigna Angularis) Cultivars Anup Engquist Barry G. Swanson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/foodmicrostructure Part of the Food Science Commons Recommended Citation Engquist, Anup and Swanson, Barry G. (1992) "Microstructural Differences Among Adzuki Bean (Vigna Angularis) Cultivars," Food Structure: Vol. 11 : No. 2 , Article 9. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/foodmicrostructure/vol11/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Dairy Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Food Structure by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOOD STRUCTURE, Vol. II (1992), pp. 171-179 1046-705X/92$3.00+ .00 Scanning Microscopy International , Chicago (AMF O'Hare), IL 60666 USA MICROSTRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ADZUKI BEAN (Vigna angularis) CULTIVARS An up Engquist and Barry G. Swanson Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6376 Abstract Introduction Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to Adzuki beans are one of the oldest cultivated beans study mi crostructural differences among five adzuki bean in the Orient, often used for human food, prepared as a cultivars: Erimo, Express, Hatsune, Takara and VBSC. bean paste used in soups and confections (Tjahjadi and Seed coat surfaces showed different patterns of cracks , Breene, 1984). The starch content of adzuki beans is pits and deposits . Cross-sections of the seed coats re­ about 50 %, while the protein content ranges between vealed well organized layers of elongated palisade cell s 20%-25% (Tjahjadi and Breene, 1984) .
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Dissection of Azuki Bean Weevil (Callosobruchus Chinensis L.) Resistance in Moth Bean (Vigna Aconitifolia [Jaqc.] Maréchal)
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Genetic Dissection of Azuki Bean Weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) Resistance in Moth Bean (Vigna aconitifolia [Jaqc.] Maréchal) Prakit Somta 1,2,3,* , Achara Jomsangawong 4, Chutintorn Yundaeng 1, Xingxing Yuan 1, Jingbin Chen 1 , Norihiko Tomooka 5 and Xin Chen 1,* 1 Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 50 Zhongling Street, Nanjing 210014, China; [email protected] (C.Y.); [email protected] (X.Y.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand 3 Center for Agricultural Biotechnology (AG-BIO/PEDRO-CHE), Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand 4 Program in Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand; [email protected] 5 Genetic Resources Center, Gene Bank, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (X.C.) Received: 3 September 2018; Accepted: 12 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: The azuki bean weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) is an insect pest responsible for serious postharvest seed loss in leguminous crops. In this study, we performed quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping of seed resistance to C. chinensis in moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia [Jaqc.] Maréchal). An F2 population of 188 plants developed by crossing resistant accession ‘TN67’ (wild type from India; male parent) and susceptible accession ‘IPCMO056’ (cultivated type from India; female parent) was used for mapping.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.10.2.2: Peanut Processing
    9.10.2.2 Peanut Processing 9.10.2.2.1 General Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), also known as groundnuts or goobers, are an annual leguminous herb native to South America. The peanut peduncle, or peg (the stalk that holds the flower), elongates after flower fertilization and bends down into the ground, where the peanut seed matures. Peanuts have a growing period of approximately 5 months. Seeding typically occurs mid-April to mid-May, and harvesting during August in the United States. Light, sandy loam soils are preferred for peanut production. Moderate rainfall of between 51 and 102 centimeters (cm) (20 and 40 inches [in.]) annually is also necessary. The leading peanut producing states are Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Florida, and Oklahoma. 9.10.2.2.2 Process Description The initial step in processing is harvesting, which typically begins with the mowing of mature peanut plants. Then the peanut plants are inverted by specialized machines, peanut inverters, that dig, shake, and place the peanut plants, with the peanut pods on top, into windrows for field curing. After open-air drying, mature peanuts are picked up from the windrow with combines that separate the peanut pods from the plant using various thrashing operations. The peanut plants are deposited back onto the fields and the pods are accumulated in hoppers. Some combines dig and separate the vines and stems from the peanut pods in 1 step, and peanuts harvested by this method are cured in storage. Some small producers still use traditional harvesting methods, plowing the plants from the ground and manually stacking them for field curing.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Manufacturing Practices and Industry Best Practices for Peanut
    GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES AND INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES FOR PEANUT PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS Revised October 2009 The American Peanut Council 1500 King Street, Suite 301 Alexandria, Virginia _____________________________________________________________ Any reproduction of the information contained in this document requires the express written consent of the American Peanut Council, 1500 King Street, Suite 301, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Contents DEFINITION OF TERMS .............................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES ................................................................................................... 7 Personnel Practices ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Establishing a Training Program .............................................................................................................. 8 Educate workers on the importance of proper hand washing techniques ................................................. 8 Building and Facilities ................................................................................................................................. 9 Plants and Grounds ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT SHI, XIAOLEI. Effects of Different
    ABSTRACT SHI, XIAOLEI. Effects of Different Roasting Conditions on Peanut Quality. (Under the direction of Dr. Lisa L. Dean and Dr. K.P. Sandeep). In the U.S., a major portion of the peanut crop is converted from whole seed into value-added products. For such purposes, the peanut seeds are processed using a thermal operation as the first step in the manufacture of the final products, to achieve specific flavors, colors, and textures. Peanuts are typically processed by dry roasting or oil roasting (deep frying and blister frying). Comparisons among different dry roasting conditions and different roasting methods were made in this work regarding their effects on the quality-related properties of roasted peanuts. On an industrial scale, peanuts are typically roasted to a specific color for quality control. Recent lab scale experiments demonstrated that peanuts roasted to equivalent surface colors at different time/temperature combinations could vary substantially in chemical and physical properties related to product quality. This study expanded that approach to a pilot plant scale roaster. Jumbo-size runner-type peanuts were systematically roasted at 5 temperatures (149-204 °C) to three Hunter L-values of 53.0, 48.5, and 43.0 using the same peanut bed depth and air flow. The flavor of medium dry roasted peanuts was superior to light and dark roasts, with higher roasted peanutty and sweet aromatic flavor notes. Total tocopherols of oil extracted from the roasted peanuts was greatest in peanuts roasted to darker colors, with the medium and dark oil showing no significant differences from the raw oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Processing Wastes Used As Feed Ingredient for Animal Feed and Aquaculture Feed
    Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences 6(2) 55-64 2020 Fish processing wastes used as feed ingredient for animal feed and aquaculture feed Afreen M.1; Ucak I.1* Received: May 2019 Accepted: July 2019 Abstract: Fish wastes management has become a global problem from the last years. Dispose of seafood wastes cause environmental pollution. To overcome this issue these unwanted seafood products are used for the formation of animal feed and aquaculture feed. These unwanted products include small fish and those parts of fish which are not used as human food. These unwanted parts include viscera, head, fins and skin of fish. These byproducts are rich source of protein, minerals and vitamins so these can be used as a supplement in animal feed. These are also used to fulfill the deficiency of protein in animals. These byproducts can be used in the form of fish meal, fish oil, and protein hydrolysates and fish silage. Protein hydrolysates provide high amount of nitrogen and fish oil provide triglycerides of fatty acids and phospholipids in the animal feed industry. These are also used in the formation of pet feed and in the formation of fertilizers. These byproducts are processed for feeding by using fermentation, biotechnological and bio preservation techniques. Keywords: Seafood, Byproduct, Supplement, Fish silage, Fish oil, Protein hydrolysate. Downloaded from sifisheriessciences.com at 14:03 +0330 on Wednesday October 6th 2021 [ DOI: 10.18331/SFS2020.6.2.7 ] 1-Department of Animal Production and Technologies, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University,
    [Show full text]
  • Sprout Production in California
    PUBLICATION 8060 Sprout Production in California WAYNE L. SCHRADER, University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, San Diego County Sprouts have been used for food since before recorded history. Sprouts vary in texture and taste. Some are spicy (e.g., radish and onions), some are used in Asian foods (e.g., mung bean [Phaseolus aureus]), and others are delicate (e.g., alfalfa) and are UNIVERSITY OF used in salads and sandwiches to add texture. Vegetable sprouts grown for food are CALIFORNIA baby plants that are harvested just after germination. Various crop seeds may be Agriculture sprouted. The most common are adzuki, alfalfa, buckwheat, Brassica spp. (broccoli, and Natural Resources etc.), cabbage, clover, cress, garbanzo, green peas, lentils, mung bean, radish, rye, http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu sesame, wheat, and triticale. Production practices should provide appropriate ger- mination conditions, moisture, and temperatures that allow for the “harvesting” of the sprouts at their optimal eating quality. Production practices should also allow for efficient cleaning and packaging of sprouts. VARIETIES Mung bean seed are used to produce bean sprouts; some soybeans and adzuki beans are also used to produce bean sprouts. The preferred varieties are those that have smaller-sized seed. With small seed, the cotyledons and seed coats are less objec- tionable or are more easily removed from the finished product. The smallest-seeded varieties of mung bean are Oklahoma 12 and Oriental; larger-seeded types are Jumbo and Berken. Any small-seeded adzuki may be used for sprouts; a variety called Chinese Red Adzuki is sometimes substituted for adzuki bean even though it is not a true adzuki bean.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Local Feed Ingredients of Benin, West Africa, for Fish Feed
    Aquaculture Reports 17 (2020) 100386 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqrep Screening local feed ingredients of Benin, West Africa, for fish feed formulation T Adékambi Désiré Adéyèmia, Adéchola P. Polycarpe Kayodéa,*, Ifagbemi Bienvenue Chabia, Oloudé B. Oscar Odouaroa, Martinus J.R. Noutb, Anita R. Linnemannc a Laboratory of Valorization and Quality Management of Food Bio-Ingredients, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 BP 526 Cotonou, Benin b Ronfostec, Papenpad 14, 6705 AX Wageningen, the Netherlands c Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The cost of fish feed is a major constraint to fish farming in Sub-Sahara Africa. In the aquaculture value chain, Fish feed feed is a determining factor and accounts for 60-75% of the total cost of fish production in many African Ingredient countries. Therefore, 284 actors from all eight agro-ecological areas of Benin were interviewed and 28 local feed Nutritional quality ingredients were collected as alternative ingredients for new fish feed formulations for, predominantly, Clarias Availability gariepinus and Tilapia niloticus. Three categories of feeds were used, namely imported (84% of farmers), locally Cost produced to complement imported feeds (76%) and natural ingredients (81%). The main imported feeds were Clarias gariepinus from the Netherlands (59% of farmers), Ghana (52%) and France (15%). Natural ingredients were mostly Moringa leaves (52%), cassava leaves (26%) and maggots (43%). The best available ingredients were cereal bran, soybean meal, cottonseed meal, cassava chips, palm kernel cake, soybean and maize.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Terms Used in Animal Feeding and Nutrition
    Common Terms Used in Animal Feeding and Nutrition Uttam Saha, Program Coordinator, Feed and Environmental Water Laboratory Leticia Sonon, Program Coordinator, Soil, Plant, and Water Laboratory Dennis Hancock, Assistant Professor, Extension Forage Specialist Nicholas Hill, Professor, Crop and Soil Sciences Lawton Stewart, Assistant Professor, Extension Beef Specialist Gary Heusner, Professor, Extension Equine Specialist David E. Kissel, Professor and Director, Agricultural and Environmental Services Laboratories The largest operating cost in a livestock production enterprise is the feed bill. To keep this cost low, one must sup- ply the right amount of feed to the animals. Overfeeding is wasteful. Underfeeding will decrease animal perfor- mance and profitability. Therefore, proper animal feeding and nutrition are crucial to the profitability of the live- stock enterprise. Laboratory analyses of the composition of feed or forage are used to assess their nutritive value (Figure 1). A typi- cal feed analysis includes measurements of some important quality attributes or parameters (e.g., crude protein, fiber, digestibility, etc.) used to define nutritive value. Other parameters are analyzed under some special circum- stances. For example, acid detergent insoluble crude protein (ADICP) is usually only measured if heat damage to the feed is suspected. Feed or Forage Sample Dry Water Removed Organic Matter (Burned) Burn Moisture Free Feed/Dry Matter (Remains) Ash (Remains): Neutral Detergent Extraction Various Minerals and Sand Neutral Detergent
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Agricultural, Historical, Nutritional, and Sustainable Uses of Pulse Grains and Legumes
    EVALUATING THE AGRICULTURAL, HISTORICAL, NUTRITIONAL, AND SUSTAINABLE USES OF PULSE GRAINS AND LEGUMES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Stefanie Marie Havemeier IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE June 2018 ©Stefanie Marie Havemeier 2018 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to extend my sincerest appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Joanne Slavin, for her guidance, trust, and support throughout my graduate degree. She is a role model to all, especially her graduate students, and her positive attitude brings life to any arduous task. I would undoubtedly not be where I am today if it were not for Dr. Slavin providing me with the opportunity to work alongside her. I would also like to thank my other advisory committee members: Dr. Dave Smith and Dr. Renee Korczak. Thank you, Dr. Dave Smith, for providing me with fundamental information that forms the basis of food science and always a good laugh in the classroom. Thank you, Dr. Korczak, for allowing me to work beside you as your teacher’s assistant, barreling through endless student emails together. I thank my lab mates, Alexis, Hannah, Jennifer, Julie, Justin, and Rylee, for providing guidance and advice and for always listening. I would not have been able to complete this journey without your constant support. To my parents, David and Jeane, I would like to thank you for your encouragement and unending support not only throughout this process but, throughout my entire life. To my sister, Stacie, thank you for listening to me talk, “about my beans,” endlessly.
    [Show full text]