DOCSLIB.ORG

Amphibians, 2010 Hyla Chrysoscelis Tadpoles Ambystoma Opacum Desmognathus Sp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amphibians, 2010 Hyla Chrysoscelis Tadpoles Ambystoma Opacum Desmognathus Sp National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Summary of Amphibian Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park, 2010 Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRDS—2011/167 ON THE COVER Ambystoma opacum (marbled salamander) Photograph by SECN staff. Summary of Amphibian Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park, 2010 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2011/167 Michael W. Byrne, Briana D. Smrekar, Marylou N. Moore, Casey S. Harris, and Brent A. Blankley USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 May 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Data were collected and analyzed using established methods based on peer-reviewed protocols and were analyzed and interpreted within the guidelines of the protocols. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Southeast Coast Network (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/secn) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm). Please cite this publication as: Byrne, M. W., B. D. Smrekar, M. N. Moore, C. S. Harris, and B. A. Blankley. 2011. Summary of amphibian community monitoring at Congaree National Park, 2010. Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2011/167. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 178/107768, May 2011 ii Contents Page Figures............................................................................................................................................. v Tables ............................................................................................................................................. ix Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... xi Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 1 Objective .................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 3 Study Area ............................................................................................................................... 3 Sampling Design ...................................................................................................................... 4 Sampling Methodology ........................................................................................................... 4 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 4 Diversity .............................................................................................................................. 6 Composition ........................................................................................................................ 6 Distribution ......................................................................................................................... 6 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Diversity ................................................................................................................................ 11 Composition ........................................................................................................................... 11 Amphibians ....................................................................................................................... 11 Reptiles ............................................................................................................................. 12 Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 16 Amphibians ....................................................................................................................... 16 Reptiles ............................................................................................................................. 16 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................. 57 iii Contents (continued) Page Appendix A. Amphibians and reptiles known to occur at CONG. .............................................. 61 Appendix B. Map of sampling locations with point labels. .......................................................... 65 Appendix C. Species detections by sampling location. ................................................................ 67 iv Figures Page Figure 1. Location of Congaree National Park. ............................................................................ 3 Figure 2. Spatially-balanced random sampling locations at CONG, 2010. .................................. 5 Figure 3. Proportions of amphibian species at CONG, 2010. ..................................................... 13 Figure 4. Proportion of reptile species and reptile signs at CONG, 2010. .................................. 14 Figure 5. Sampling locations where Southern cricket frog (Acris gryllus) was detected at CONG, 2010. .............................................................................................................. 17 Figure 6. Sampling locations where Southern toad (Bufo terrestris) was detected at CONG, 2010. ................................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 7. Sampling locations where eastern narrow-mouthed toad (Gastrophryne carolinensis) was detected at CONG, 2010. ................................................................................. 19 Figure 8. Sampling locations where Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) was detected at CONG, 2010. .............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 9. Sampling locations where Cope’s gray treefrog tadpoles were detected at CONG, 2010. ................................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 10. Sampling locations where green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) was detected at CONG, 2010. ................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 11. Sampling locations where squirrel treefrog (Hyla squirella) was detected at CONG, 2010. ............................................................................................................................ 23 Figure 12. Sampling locations where Brimley’s chorus frog (Pseudacris brimleyi) was detected at CONG, 2010. ...................................................................................................... 24 Figure 13. Sampling locations where Spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) was detected at CONG, 2010. .............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 14. Sampling locations where unknown Pseudacris sp. was detected at CONG, 2010. ................................................................................................................................ 26 Figure 15. Sampling locations where bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) was detected at CONG, 2010. ................................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 16. Sampling locations where green frog (Rana clamitans) was detected at CONG, 2010. ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ornate Chorus Frog
    Ornate Chorus Frog Pseudacris ornata Taxa: Amphibian SE-GAP Spp Code: aOCFR Order: Anura ITIS Species Code: 173531 Family: Hylidae NatureServe Element Code: AAABC05050 KNOWN RANGE: PREDICTED HABITAT: P:\Proj1\SEGap P:\Proj1\SEGap Range Map Link: http://www.basic.ncsu.edu/segap/datazip/maps/SE_Range_aOCFR.pdf Predicted Habitat Map Link: http://www.basic.ncsu.edu/segap/datazip/maps/SE_Dist_aOCFR.pdf GAP Online Tool Link: http://www.gapserve.ncsu.edu/segap/segap/index2.php?species=aOCFR Data Download: http://www.basic.ncsu.edu/segap/datazip/region/vert/aOCFR_se00.zip PROTECTION STATUS: Reported on March 14, 2011 Federal Status: --- State Status: MS (Non-game species in need of management), NC (SR) NS Global Rank: G5 NS State Rank: AL (S5), FL (SNR), GA (S5), LA (S1), MS (S1), NC (S3), SC (SNR) aOCFR Page 1 of 4 SUMMARY OF PREDICTED HABITAT BY MANAGMENT AND GAP PROTECTION STATUS: US FWS US Forest Service Tenn. Valley Author. US DOD/ACOE ha % ha % ha % ha % Status 1 14,156.0 < 1 2,389.3 < 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 Status 2 32,041.4 < 1 24,919.3 < 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 Status 3 3.2 < 1 181,436.9 4 0.0 0 75,398.1 2 Status 4 5.2 < 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Total 46,205.9 < 1 208,745.5 4 0.0 0 75,398.1 2 US Dept. of Energy US Nat. Park Service NOAA Other Federal Lands ha % ha % ha % ha % Status 1 0.0 0 7,947.2 < 1 8.6 < 1 706.9 < 1 Status 2 0.0 0 1,356.0 < 1 1,336.1 < 1 0.0 0 Status 3 13,565.2 < 1 84.2 < 1 0.0 0 1,051.8 < 1 Status 4 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Total 13,565.2 < 1 9,387.5 < 1 1,344.6 < 1 1,758.7 < 1 Native Am.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>ANOLIS</I> LIZARDS in the FOOD WEBS of STRUCTURALLY
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2016 ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANOLIS LIZARDS IN THE FOOD WEBS OF STRUCTURALLY-SIMPLE HABITATS IN FLORIDA Nathan W. Turnbough University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Turnbough, Nathan W., "ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANOLIS LIZARDS IN THE FOOD WEBS OF STRUCTURALLY-SIMPLE HABITATS IN FLORIDA. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2016. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4174 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Nathan W. Turnbough entitled "ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANOLIS LIZARDS IN THE FOOD WEBS OF STRUCTURALLY-SIMPLE HABITATS IN FLORIDA." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
    [Show full text]
  • For Submission As a Note Green Anole (Anolis Carolinensis) Eggs
    For submission as a Note Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis) Eggs Associated with Nest Chambers of the Trap Jaw Ant, Odontomachus brunneus Christina L. Kwapich1 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell One University Ave., Lowell, Massachusetts, USA [email protected] Abstract Vertebrates occasionally deposit eggs in ant nests, but these associations are largely restricted to neotropical fungus farming ants in the tribe Attini. The subterranean chambers of ponerine ants have not previously been reported as nesting sites for squamates. The current study reports the occurrence of Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis) eggs and hatchlings in a nest of the trap jaw ant, Odontomachus brunneus. Hatching rates suggest that O. brunneus nests may be used communally by multiple females, which share spatial resources with another recently introduced Anolis species in their native range. This nesting strategy is placed in the context of known associations between frogs, snakes, legless worm lizards and ants. Introduction Subterranean ant nests are an attractive resource for vertebrates seeking well-defended cavities for their eggs. To access an ant nest, trespassers must work quickly or rely on adaptations that allow them to overcome the strict odor-recognition systems of ants. For example the myrmecophilous frog, Lithodytes lineatus, bears a chemical disguise that permits it to mate and deposit eggs deep inside the nests of the leafcutter ant, Atta cephalotes, without being bitten or harassed. Tadpoles inside nests enjoy the same physical and behavioral protection as the ants’ own brood, in a carefully controlled microclimate (de Lima Barros et al. 2016, Schlüter et al. 2009, Schlüter and Regös 1981, Schlüter and Regös 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • There's a New Kid in Town – How Native Anoles Avoid Competition From
    THERE’S A NEW KID IN TOWN – HOW NATIVE ANOLES AVOID COMPETITION FROM INVASIVE ANOLES Anolis carolinensis, commonly called the Green anole (Fig. 1), is a small lizard that lives in the southeast United States. It is active during the day in vegetation close to the ground. In the 1950s, another anole lizard, the Brown anole (Anolis sagrei; Fig. 2) arrived in Florida from Cuba, probably on ships that moved between the two countries. The Brown anole became invasive, rapidly spreading its species range from South Florida into the rest of Florida as well as into parts of Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas. Figure 1. Anolis carolinensis male on a fallen tree Figure 2. Anolis sagrei male, perching on a log. trunk. (Photo by Euku/Wikimedia Commons) The Brown anole is very similar to the Green anole. Like the Green anole, it is a few inches long, eats insects, is active during the day, and favors living on the ground and low down on bushes and tree trunks. However, the Brown anole is a little bit heavier than the Green anole and also more aggressive when forming and defending territories. Given that both species have such similar ecological niches, the question arises what effect the invasive Brown anole might have on the native Green anole. In Cuba, for example, where close relatives of the Green anole live together with the Brown anole (i.e. both species are sympatric), the Green anoles spend most of their time higher up in the trees, probably because of competition with the more aggressive Brown anole.
    [Show full text]
  • WAPA Reptile Survey 2001 Final Report
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 169 Inventory of the reptiles of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park, Guam October 2001* Gordon H. Rodda1, and Kathy Dean-Bradley1 *Published on-line February 2010 1U.S. Geological Survey 2150 Centre Ave., Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8118 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: U.S. Geological Survey 2150 Centre Ave., Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8118, phone: (970) 226- 9471 http://www.fort.usgs.gov/ Recommended Citation: Rodda, G.H and K. Dean-Bradley. 2001. Inventory of the reptiles of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report 169. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Botany. Honolulu, HI. 41 pg. Key words: Anolis carolinensis, Brown Treesnake Carlia fusca, Emoia caeruleocauda, Gehyra mutilata, Hemidactylus frenatus, Ramphotyphlops braminus, reptile inventory Place key words: War in the Pacific National Historical Park, Guam Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (e-mail: [email protected]) Executive summary – There are no native amphibians on Guam. Reptile species of offshore islets were reported in an earlier paper (Perry et al.1998). In February through April 2001 we intensively sampled the reptiles of the mainland portions of War in the Pacific National Historical Park (WAPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunal Communities in Ephemeral Wetlands Embedded Within Longleaf Pine Flatwoods of the Gulf Coastal Plain
    20162016 SOUTHEASTERNSoutheastern NaturalistNATURALIST 15(3):431–447Vol. 15, No. 3 K.J. Erwin, H.C. Chandler, J.G. Palis, T.A. Gorman, and C.A. Haas Herpetofaunal Communities in Ephemeral Wetlands Embedded within Longleaf Pine Flatwoods of the Gulf Coastal Plain Kenneth J. Erwin1, Houston C. Chandler1,2,*, John G. Palis3, Thomas A. Gorman1,4, and Carola A. Haas1 Abstract - Ephemeral wetlands surrounded by Pinus palustris (Longleaf Pine) flatwoods support diverse herpetofaunal communities and provide important breeding habitat for many species. We sampled herpetofauna in 3 pine flatwoods wetlands on Eglin Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, FL, over 2 time periods (1 wetland [1] from 1993 to1995 and 2 wetlands [2 and 3] from 2010 to 2015) using drift fences that completely encircled each wetland. We documented 37, 46, and 43 species of amphibians and reptiles at wetlands 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Herpetofaunal communities were remarkably similar across all 3 wetlands (Sorenson Index values > 0.97) despite sampling that occurred 15–20 years apart on wetlands located approximately 10 km apart. Ambystoma bishopi (Reticulated Flat- woods Salamander), Pseudacris ornata (Ornate Chorus Frog), and Eurycea quadridigitata (Dwarf Salamander), all species of conservation concern, were captured at all 3 wetlands, indicating that these wetlands provide habitat for specialist species. Overall, habitat con- servation and management has succeeded in maintaining suitable habitat for herpetofauna in recently surveyed wetlands, despite continued range-wide threats from changes to his- toric fire regimes and climate change. Introduction Ephemeral wetlands often support diverse amphibian and reptile communities (Dodd and Cade 1998, Gibbons et al. 2006, Means et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Freshwater Fishes, Terrestrial Herpetofauna and Mammals of Pulau Tekong, Singapore Author(S) Kelvin K.P
    Title Freshwater fishes, terrestrial herpetofauna and mammals of Pulau Tekong, Singapore Author(s) Kelvin K.P. Lim, Marcus A. H., Chua and Norman T-L. Lim Source Nature in Singapore, 9, 165–198 Published by Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore Copyright © 2016 National University of Singapore This document may be used for private study or research purpose only. This document or any part of it may not be duplicated and/or distributed without permission of the copyright owner. The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. This document first appeared in: Lim, K. K. P., Chua, M. A. H., & Lim, N. T. -L. (2016). Freshwater fishes, terrestrial herpetofauna and mammals of Pulau Tekong, Singapore. Nature in Singapore, 9, 165–198. Retrieved from http://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/nus/images/pdfs/nis/2016/2016nis165-198.pdf This document was archived with permission from the copyright owner. NATURE IN SINGAPORE 2016 9: 165–198 Date of Publication: 1 November 2016 © National University of Singapore Freshwater fishes, terrestrial herpetofauna and mammals of Pulau Tekong, Singapore Kelvin K.P. Lim1*, Marcus A. H. Chua1 & Norman T-L. Lim2 1Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117377, Republic of Singapore; Email: [email protected] (KKPL; *corresponding author), [email protected] (MAHC) 2Natural Sciences and Science Education Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616, Republic of Singapore; Email: [email protected] (NTLL) Abstract. The diversity of terrestrial and freshwater, non-avian, vertebrate fauna of Pulau Tekong, an island used almost exclusively by the Singapore Armed Forces, was compiled.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Novel Tetranucleotide and Five Cross-Species Dinucleotide Microsatellite Loci for the Ornate Chorus Frog (Pseudacris Ornata)
    Molecular Ecology Resources (2009) 9, 622–624 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02478.x PERMANENTBlackwell Publishing Ltd GENETIC RESOURCES NOTE Eight novel tetranucleotide and five cross-species dinucleotide microsatellite loci for the ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata) JACOB F. DEGNER,* TYLER D. HETHER and ERIC A. HOFFMAN Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, Florida 32816, USA Abstract We describe the cloning and characterization of eight novel tetranucleotide microsatellite loci in the ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata). We also screened 26 loci from GenBank that were isolated from other Pseudacris species and obtained consistent product from five of these dinucleotide loci. All loci are polymorphic. In our sample of 26 frogs from a natural population, polymorphism ranged from 1 to 22 alleles per locus with expected heterozygosities ranging from 0 to 0.958. These loci enable high-resolution studies of P. ornata. Moreover, cross-species amplification success suggests they will also be useful for other chorus frog species. Keywords: biotin enrichment, chorus frog, microsatellite, Pseudacris ornata Received 22 July 2008; revision accepted 15 October 2008 The ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata) is a small terrestrial motif bound to streptavidin-coated particles (Promega) frog occurring in the coastal plains of the southeastern enriched via magnetic separation. Enriched product was USA. Moriarty & Cannatella (2004) suggest some degree of cloned using TOPO TA cloning kits (Invitrogen). PCR phylogeographical structure in this species although gene screening followed the procedure from Cabe & Marshal flow and high-resolution population genetic structure has (2001). Briefly, two PCRs were carried out per sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Influenza-Like Viruses of Amphibians and Fish Support
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.27.270959; this version posted August 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Divergent influenza-like viruses of amphibians and fish support 2 an ancient evolutionary association 3 4 5 Rhys Parry1, #, *, Michelle Wille2, #, Olivia M. H. Turnbull3, Jemma L. Geoghegan4,5, Edward C. 6 Holmes2,* 7 1 Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, 8 The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia; [email protected] (R.P) 9 2 Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life & Environmental 10 Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, 11 Australia; [email protected] (M.W.); [email protected] (E.C.H) 12 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; 13 [email protected] (O.M.H.T) 14 4 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; 15 [email protected] (J.L.G) 16 5 Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Wellington 5018, New Zealand 17 18 # These authors contributed equally 19 20 * Correspondence: [email protected] Tel +617 3365 3302 (R.P); [email protected] Tel 21 +61 2 9351 5591 (E.C.H) 22 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.27.270959; this version posted August 27, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Reptiles and Amphibians of Florida!
    1 Invasive Reptiles and Amphibians of Florida! 2 Created by: Thompson Antony Lauren Diaz Sean McKnight Alana Palau JoAnna Platzer Illustrated by Lauren Diaz Invasive Ecology of Reptiles and Amphibians Dr. Steven Johnson & Dr. Christina Romagosa University of Florida 2014 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Welcome What is an invasive species? Where are they found in Florida? What do they look like? How can I help? You came to the right coloring book, my friend! These questions and so many more can be answered by grabbing some crayons and turning the page. Things you will need: Your favorite coloring utensils Thinking cap 3 What is an INVASIVE SPECIES ??? An invasive species is a plant or animal that is moved from its native area to another and causes economic or environmental harm to the new area. There are 6 main ways a plant or animal can move from its native home to a non-native area: 1. Biological control: moved by humans to help control other animals 2. Hitchhike: catches a free ride on cars, boats, or planes 3. Food: Some people eat frog legs or other animal parts 4. Plant trade: hiding in a plant is a sneaky way to travel 5. Pet Trade: people want animals they can’t find in their backyard 6. Intentional: Someone brought it for some specific reason For many invasive reptiles and amphibians in Florida, the animals came through the pet trade. 4 Brown Anole Anolis sagrei This is a Cuban Brown Anole! The brown anole is originally from Cuba, but came to Florida when it hitched a ride on some cargo.
    [Show full text]
  • It Is Time for a New Classification of Anoles (Squamata: Dactyloidae)
    Zootaxa 3477: 1–108 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Monograph ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:32126D3A-04BC-4AAC-89C5-F407AE28021C ZOOTAXA 3477 It is time for a new classification of anoles (Squamata: Dactyloidae) KIRSTEN E. NICHOLSON1, BRIAN I. CROTHER2, CRAIG GUYER3 & JAY M. SAVAGE4 1Department of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by S. Carranza: 17 May 2012; published: 11 Sept. 2012 KIRSTEN E. NICHOLSON, BRIAN I. CROTHER, CRAIG GUYER & JAY M. SAVAGE It is time for a new classification of anoles (Squamata: Dactyloidae) (Zootaxa 3477) 108 pp.; 30 cm. 11 Sept. 2012 ISBN 978-1-77557-010-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-011-0 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2012 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2012 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]