DOCSLIB.ORG

Clams, Cockles, Arkshells Clams, Coques, Arches Almejas, Berberechos, Arcas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clams, Cockles, Arkshells Clams, Coques, Arches Almejas, Berberechos, Arcas 107 Clams, cockles, arkshells B-56 Clams, coques, arches Q = t Almejas, berberechos, arcas V = US$'000 Species, country Espèce, pays 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Especie, país t t t t t t t t t t Inflated ark ...B ...C Scapharca broughtonii 3,16(04)005,07 ACB Korea Rep 13 156 23 029 8 550 10 618 7 359 4 745 4 696 3 134 2 548 2 064 Species total Q 13 156 23 029 8 550 10 618 7 359 4 745 4 696 3 134 2 548 2 064 V 98 670 86 735 49 911 51 157 41 622 29 081 28 058 22 565 19 689 18 393 Blood cockle Arche granuleuse Arca del Pacífico occidental Anadara granosa 3,16(04)071,01 BLC China 129 518 157 525 188 355 199 166 232 229 237 534 317 870 323 225 303 727 315 950 China,Taiwan - - - - - - - - - - Korea Rep 2 843 5 041 2 511 820 3 842 413 2 440 10 849 3 226 5 063 Malaysia 58 400 81 717 79 912 64 396 70 816 78 712 71 067 64 565 59 521 45 674 Thailand 8 258 44 150 61 678 45 657 75 863 80 750 67 362 69 496 56 853 66 062 Species total Q 199 019 288 433 332 456 310 039 382 750 397 409 458 739 468 135 423 327 432 749 V 204 765 244 137 286 590 290 796 346 619 366 601 457 768 431 570 434 212 461 913 Anadara clams nei Arches anadara nca Arcas anadara nep Anadara spp 3,16(04)071,XX BLS Fiji Islands ... ... 1 416 1 416 1 416 0 0 0 0 ... Guatemala ... ... 1 - - - - ... ... ... Species total Q ... ... 1 417 1 416 1 416 0 0 0 0 ... V ... ... 429 425 425 0 0 0 0 ... Striped venus Petite praire Chirla Chamelea gallina 3,16(11)001,05 SVE Spain ... 80 123 119 ... ... ... - - - Species total Q ... 80 123 119 ... ... ... - - - V ... 256 394 381 ... ... ... - - - Pullet carpet shell Palourde bleue Almeja babosa Venerupis pullastra 3,16(11)003,01 CTS Portugal 1 - - 1 1 0 - - 2 4 Spain 3 105 2 408 2 330 1 933 2 083 111 288 123 300 206 Species total Q 3 106 2 408 2 330 1 934 2 084 111 288 123 302 210 V 24 848 19 264 18 640 15 471 16 254 866 1 440 615 1 512 1 053 Banded carpet shell Palourde rose Almeja rubia Venerupis rhomboides 3,16(11)003,03 VNR Spain 900 700 700 ... ... ... ... ... - - Species total Q 900 700 700 ... ... ... ... ... - - V 4 500 3 500 3 500 ... ... ... ... ... - - Japanese hard clam Cythérée du Japon Mercenaria japonesa Meretrix lusoria 3,16(11)017,01 HCJ China,Taiwan 25 761 25 874 26 533 26 700 28 164 30 711 31 517 26 255 23 466 48 187 Korea Rep 47 - 17 - 26 5 167 127 47 107 Species total Q 25 808 25 874 26 550 26 700 28 190 30 716 31 684 26 382 23 513 48 294 V 31 061 25 045 25 285 29 819 34 880 31 745 35 963 30 970 28 140 49 425 Grooved carpet shell Palourde croisée d'Europe Almeja fina Ruditapes decussatus 3,16(11)020,01 CTG Algeria 15 F 22 4 8 F 16 F 14 F 2 F ... ... ... Channel Is 2 0 - - - - 0 ... ... ... France 250 500 1 466 483 1 015 718 325 905 905 1 000 F Italy ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 3 785 5 364 Portugal 3 259 3 325 1 397 2 416 2 723 3 094 3 186 2 011 1 645 1 645 Spain 1 210 1 096 1 052 891 799 250 255 166 101 159 UK - - - - - - 5 5 ... 4 Species total Q 4 736 4 943 3 919 3 798 4 553 4 076 3 773 3 087 6 436 8 172 V 43 583 44 751 35 095 33 111 37 132 32 339 24 726 20 548 42 060 52 008 Japanese carpet shell Palourde japonaise Almeja japonesa Ruditapes philippinarum 3,16(11)020,02 CLJ China 1 257 488 1 404 443 1 797 247 1 616 378 2 014 426 2 300 941 2 546 133 2 799 004 2 857 376 3 018 803 China,Taiwan 719 923 258 468 315 234 241 212 183 164 France ... ... ... 507 1 015 719 325 905 905 1 000 F Ireland 200 233 121 92 91 100 154 181 161 245 Italy 40 000 48 000 50 000 53 000 55 000 41 139 25 000 27 737 65 893 56 731 Korea Rep 13 958 17 178 16 135 17 927 16 433 10 652 27 494 27 570 17 401 14 327 Spain 140 1 630 1 826 2 737 1 278 901 982 753 1 042 717 UK 36 31 29 29 36 36 F 23 F 50 5 50 USA 2 363 1 896 3 997 2 381 2 818 2 862 2 975 3 243 3 934 3 934 F Species total Q 1 314 904 1 474 334 1 869 613 1 693 519 2 091 412 2 357 584 2 603 327 2 859 655 2 946 900 3 095 971 V 1 762 618 1 969 685 2 287 172 2 130 030 2 490 627 2 814 581 3 126 791 2 218 362 2 619 210 2 820 876 Carpet shells nei Clovisses nca Almejas nep Ruditapes spp 3,16(11)020,XX TPS South Africa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - Tunisia ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Species total Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... ... ... V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... ... ... Warty venus Praire commune Escupina grabada Venus verrucosa 3,16(11)027,01 VEV Spain 4 0 3 ... ... 2 1 1 1 1 Species total Q 4 0 3 ... ... 2 1 1 1 1 V 76 0 54 ... ... 30 15 15 15 15 Oriental cyclina Cycline orientale ...C Cyclina sinensis 3,16(11)029,01 KNJ Korea Rep 5 33 3 1 25 219 189 79 80 256 Species total Q 5 33 3 1 25 219 189 79 80 256 V 9 73 9 4 95 792 740 298 350 1 120 108 Clams, cockles, arkshells B-56 Clams, coques, arches Q = t Almejas, berberechos, arcas V = US$'000 Species, country Espèce, pays 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Especie, país t t t t t t t t t t Butter clam Coque jaune Almeja amarilla Saxidomus giganteus 3,16(11)037,02 BCL Canada 649 704 800 1 000 1 400 1 400 1 589 1 528 1 831 1 600 USA 8 10 ... 24 23 25 5 5 ... ... Species total Q 657 714 800 1 024 1 423 1 425 1 594 1 533 1 831 1 600 V 2 102 2 453 2 278 3 065 4 211 4 421 5 769 5 439 7 091 7 322 Rooster venus Palourde coq ...C Paphia gallus 3,16(11)041,03 FAG India - - 630 630 630 ... ... ... ... ... Species total Q - - 630 630 630 ... ... ... ... ... V - - 158 158 189 ... ... ... ... ... Pacific littleneck clam Palourde commune Almejuela común Protothaca staminea 3,16(11)055,02 PTS USA 104 91 ... 81 63 205 64 79 ... ... Species total Q 104 91 ... 81 63 205 64 79 ... ... V 227 156 ... 246 131 691 271 297 ... ... Northern quahog(=Hard clam) Praire Chirla mercenaria Mercenaria mercenaria 3,16(11)075,01 CLH France ... ... ... ... ... 250 250 ... ... ... UK ... ... ... ... ... ... 1 1 250 ... USA 17 992 19 943 26 517 23 985 22 398 20 702 31 934 66 390 38 635 38 635 F Species total Q 17 992 19 943 26 517 23 985 22 398 20 952 32 185 66 391 38 885 38 635 V 25 729 18 547 38 184 28 062 28 893 25 108 37 292 52 450 56 521 56 021 Venus clams nei Petites praires nca Almejas(=Veneridos) nep Veneridae 3,16(11)XXX,XX CLV Greece 41 55 16 6 11 9 9 12 14 15 Species total Q 41 55 16 6 11 9 9 12 14 15 V 121 176 61 24 55 40 46 70 82 94 Pacific horse clam ...B ...C Tresus nuttallii 3,16(12)005,03 TQU USA - - - - 2 4 5 5 ... ... Species total Q - - - - 2 4 5 5 ... ... V - - - - 1 5 4 8 ... ... Globose clam Clam sphérique Mactra redonda Mactra veneriformis 3,16(12)008,04 MTV Korea Rep 19 - - - - - - - - - Species total Q 19 - - - - - - - - - V 12 - - - - - - - - - Smooth mactra Mactre lisse Mactra lisa Mactra glabrata 3,16(12)008,06 MAG South Africa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - Species total Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - Donax clams Olives de mer Coquinas Donax spp 3,16(15)002,XX DON Spain ... 207 129 167 ... ... ... 0 0 - Species total Q ... 207 129 167 ... ... ... 0 0 - V ... 662 452 585 ... ... ... 0 0 - Razor clams nei Couteaux nca Navajas(=Solénidos) nep Solen spp 3,16(16)003,XX RAZ Portugal - - - 0 ... ... 1 3 1 ... Species total Q - - - 0 ... ... 1 3 1 ... V - - - 0 ... ... 2 9 2 ... Sand gaper Mye des sables Almeja de can Mya arenaria 3,16(17)006,01 CLS USA ... ... ... ... 70 293 508 250 ... ... Species total Q ... ... ... ... 70 293 508 250 ... ... V ... ... ... ... 179 226 391 225 ... ... Pacific geoduck Panopée du Pacifique Panopea del Pacífico Panopea abrupta 3,16(18)089,01 GEC USA ... ... ... 9 124 235 220 349 ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Geoducks—A Compendium
    34, NUMBER 1 VOLUME JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH APRIL 2015 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH Vol. 34, No. 1 APRIL 2015 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH CONTENTS VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 APRIL 2015 Geoducks — A compendium ...................................................................... 1 Brent Vadopalas and Jonathan P. Davis .......................................................................................... 3 Paul E. Gribben and Kevin G. Heasman Developing fisheries and aquaculture industries for Panopea zelandica in New Zealand ............................... 5 Ignacio Leyva-Valencia, Pedro Cruz-Hernandez, Sergio T. Alvarez-Castaneda,~ Delia I. Rojas-Posadas, Miguel M. Correa-Ramırez, Brent Vadopalas and Daniel B. Lluch-Cota Phylogeny and phylogeography of the geoduck Panopea (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae) ..................................... 11 J. Jesus Bautista-Romero, Sergio Scarry Gonzalez-Pel aez, Enrique Morales-Bojorquez, Jose Angel Hidalgo-de-la-Toba and Daniel Bernardo Lluch-Cota Sinusoidal function modeling applied to age validation of geoducks Panopea generosa and Panopea globosa ................. 21 Brent Vadopalas, Jonathan P. Davis and Carolyn S. Friedman Maturation, spawning, and fecundity of the farmed Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa in Puget Sound, Washington ............ 31 Bianca Arney, Wenshan Liu, Ian Forster, R. Scott McKinley and Christopher M. Pearce Temperature and food-ration optimization in the hatchery culture of juveniles of the Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa ......... 39 Alejandra Ferreira-Arrieta, Zaul Garcıa-Esquivel, Marco A. Gonzalez-G omez and Enrique Valenzuela-Espinoza Growth, survival, and feeding rates for the geoduck Panopea globosa during larval development ......................... 55 Sandra Tapia-Morales, Zaul Garcıa-Esquivel, Brent Vadopalas and Jonathan Davis Growth and burrowing rates of juvenile geoducks Panopea generosa and Panopea globosa under laboratory conditions .......... 63 Fabiola G. Arcos-Ortega, Santiago J. Sanchez Leon–Hing, Carmen Rodriguez-Jaramillo, Mario A.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases Affecting Finfish
    Diseases Affecting Finfish Legislation Ireland's Exotic / Disease Name Acronym Health Susceptible Species Vector Species Non-Exotic Listed National Status Disease Measures Bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), goldfish (Carassius auratus), crucian carp (C. carassius), Epizootic Declared Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), redfin common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophtalmichthys molitrix), Haematopoietic EHN Exotic * Disease-Free perch (Percha fluviatilis) Chub (Leuciscus spp), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), tench Necrosis (Tinca tinca) Beluga (Huso huso), Danube sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii), Sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus), Starry sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus), Sturgeon (Acipenser sturio), Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser Baerii), Bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), goldfish (Carassius auratus), Crucian carp (C. carassius), common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophtalmichthys molitrix), Chub (Leuciscus spp), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), tench (Tinca tinca) Herring (Cupea spp.), whitefish (Coregonus sp.), North African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), Northern pike (Esox lucius) Catfish (Ictalurus pike (Esox Lucius), haddock (Gadus aeglefinus), spp.), Black bullhead (Ameiurus melas), Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), Pangas Pacific cod (G. macrocephalus), Atlantic cod (G. catfish (Pangasius pangasius), Pike perch (Sander lucioperca), Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) morhua), Pacific salmon (Onchorhynchus spp.), Viral
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Traits of a Native and an Invasive Clam of the Genus Ruditapes Occurring in Sympatry in a Coastal Lagoon
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Functional traits of a native and an invasive clam of the genus Ruditapes occurring in sympatry Received: 19 June 2018 Accepted: 8 October 2018 in a coastal lagoon Published: xx xx xxxx Marta Lobão Lopes1, Joana Patrício Rodrigues1, Daniel Crespo2, Marina Dolbeth1,3, Ricardo Calado1 & Ana Isabel Lillebø1 The main objective of this study was to evaluate the functional traits regarding bioturbation activity and its infuence in the nutrient cycling of the native clam species Ruditapes decussatus and the invasive species Ruditapes philippinarum in Ria de Aveiro lagoon. Presently, these species live in sympatry and the impact of the invasive species was evaluated under controlled microcosmos setting, through combined/manipulated ratios of both species, including monospecifc scenarios and a control without bivalves. Bioturbation intensity was measured by maximum, median and mean mix depth of particle redistribution, as well as by Surface Boundary Roughness (SBR), using time-lapse fuorescent sediment profle imaging (f-SPI) analysis, through the use of luminophores. Water nutrient concentrations (NH4- N, NOx-N and PO4-P) were also evaluated. This study showed that there were no signifcant diferences in the maximum, median and mean mix depth of particle redistribution, SBR and water nutrient concentrations between the diferent ratios of clam species tested. Signifcant diferences were only recorded between the control treatment (no bivalves) and those with bivalves. Thus, according to the present work, in a scenario of potential replacement of the native species by the invasive species, no signifcant diferences are anticipated in short- and long-term regarding the tested functional traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Do Algarve Biology and Hatchery Production of Chamelea
    Universidade do Algarve Biology and hatchery production of Chamelea gallina, Spisula solida and Venerupis corrugata, to support restocking and stock enhancement programs Sandra Maria Duarte Joaquim Tese de Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar, da Terra e do Ambiente (Especialidade em Tecnologia de Aquacultura) Trabalho efetuado sob a orientação de: Professor Doutor Luís Manuel Zambujal Chícharo Doutor Miguel José Baptista Gaspar 2013 Universidade do Algarve Biology and hatchery production of Chamelea gallina, Spisula solida and Venerupis corrugata, to support restocking and stock enhancement programs Sandra Maria Duarte Joaquim Tese de Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar, da Terra e do Ambiente (Especialidade em Tecnologia de Aquacultura) Trabalho efetuado sob a orientação de: Professor Doutor Luís Manuel Zambujal Chícharo Doutor Miguel José Baptista Gaspar 2013 “Declaro que sou a autora deste trabalho, que é original e inédito. Autores e trabalhos consultados estão devidamente citados no texto e constam da listagem de referências incluída.” “Copyright” A Universidade do Algarve tem o direito, perpétuo e sem limites geográficos, de arquivar e publicitar este trabalho através de exemplares impressos reproduzidos em papel ou de forma digital, ou por qualquer outro meio conhecido ou que venha a ser inventado, de o divulgar através de repositórios científicos e de admitir a sua cópia e distribuição com objetivos educacionais ou de investigação, não comerciais, desde que seja dado crédito ao autor e editor. i We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality. Albert Einstein To Íris, Duarte and Vitor. iii Acknowledgements ____________________________________________________________________________________ Acknowledgements PhD research often appears a solitary undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoduck Aquaculture Research Program (GARP)
    FINAL REPORT Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Washington Sea Grant website at wsg.washington.edu/geoduck For more information contact: Washington Sea Grant University of Washington 3716 Brooklyn Ave. N.E. Box 355060 Seattle, WA 98105-6716 206.543.6600 wsg.washington.edu [email protected] November 2013 • WSG-TR 13-03 Acknowledgements ashington Sea Grant expresses its appreciation to the many individuals who provided information and support Wfor this report. In particular, we gratefully acknowledge research program funding provided by the Washington State Legislature, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Department of Ecology, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and University of Washington. We also would like to thank shellfish growers who cooperated with program investigators to make this research possible. Finally, we would like to recognize the guidance provided by the Department of Ecology and the Shellfish Aquaculture Regulatory Committee. Primary Investigators/ Contributing Scientists Washington Sea Grant Staff Recommended Citation Report Authors Jeffrey C. Cornwell David Armstrong Penelope Dalton Washington Sea Grant Carolyn S. Friedman Lisa M. Crosson Marcus Duke (2013) Final Report: P. Sean McDonald Jonathan Davis David G. Gordon Geoduck aquaculture Jennifer Ruesink Elene M. Dorfmeier Teri King research program. Report Brent Vadopalas Tim Essington Meg Matthews to the Washington State Glenn R. VanBlaricom Paul Frelier Robyn Ricks Legislature. Washington Aaron W. E. Galloway Eric Scigliano Sea Grant Technical Report Micah J. Horwith Raechel Waters WSG-TR 13-03, 122 pp. Perry Lund Dan Williams Kate McPeek Roger I. E. Newell Julian D. Olden Michael S. Owens Jennifer L. Price Kristina M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Environment on Arctica Islandica Shell Formation and Architecture
    Biogeosciences, 14, 1577–1591, 2017 www.biogeosciences.net/14/1577/2017/ doi:10.5194/bg-14-1577-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The effects of environment on Arctica islandica shell formation and architecture Stefania Milano1, Gernot Nehrke2, Alan D. Wanamaker Jr.3, Irene Ballesta-Artero4,5, Thomas Brey2, and Bernd R. Schöne1 1Institute of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Joh.-J.-Becherweg 21, 55128 Mainz, Germany 2Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 3Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA 4Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, the Netherlands 5Department of Animal Ecology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Correspondence to: Stefania Milano ([email protected]) Received: 27 October 2016 – Discussion started: 7 December 2016 Revised: 1 March 2017 – Accepted: 4 March 2017 – Published: 27 March 2017 Abstract. Mollusks record valuable information in their hard tribution, and (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was parts that reflect ambient environmental conditions. For this used to detect changes in microstructural organization. Our reason, shells can serve as excellent archives to reconstruct results indicate that A. islandica microstructure is not sen- past climate and environmental variability. However, animal sitive to changes in the food source and, likely, shell pig- physiology and biomineralization, which are often poorly un- ment are not altered by diet. However, seawater temperature derstood, can make the decoding of environmental signals had a statistically significant effect on the orientation of the a challenging task.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual
    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Geoduck
    The Market for Geoduck Prepared for: Canada Fisheries & Oceans Vancouver, Canada Prepared by: GSGislason & Associates Ltd. Vancouver, Canada In Association with: Archibald Bedard Consulting Big Splash Seafoods Corp. Edna Lam Consulting January 2012 Preface The Canada Department of Fisheries & Oceans retained GSGislason & Associates Ltd. to conduct a market analysis for geoduck. The consultants have benefited from discussions with industry and government. Notwithstanding this assistance, the consultant has final responsibility for the analyses and conclusions of the study. The Market for Geoduck GSGislason & Associates Ltd. Page i Summary Introduction • analysis of the geoduck market is needed to inform fisheries policy and management for both wild and cultured geoduck • this report profiles: 1) world supply & demand flows of geoduck, 2) the important geoduck product attributes affecting quality, grades & pricing, 3) market potential for geoduck, and 4) the sensitivity of geoduck prices to increased supply Current Market & Distribution • current total production is about 6,000 tonnes annually - 600 to 800 tonnes from culture, the remainder from the wild fishery • 90% or more of BC production is exported with 95% of the exports going to Hong Kong and China - Vancouver is the distribution hub for both BC and US product as the city has better air connections to Hong Kong and Mainland China than West Coast US locations • the vast majority, more than 95%, is live sales - prices for live geoduck, like all live or fresh seafood, is supply-sensitive
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence That Qpx (Quahog Parasite Unknown) Is Not Present in Hatchery-Produced Hard Clam Seed
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by College of William & Mary: W&M Publish W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 1997 Evidence That Qpx (Quahog Parasite Unknown) Is Not Present In Hatchery-Produced Hard Clam Seed Susan E. Ford Roxanna Smolowitz Lisa M. Ragone Calvo Virginia Institute of Marine Science RD Barber John N. Kraueter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Ford, Susan E.; Smolowitz, Roxanna; Ragone Calvo, Lisa M.; Barber, RD; and Kraueter, John N., "Evidence That Qpx (Quahog Parasite Unknown) Is Not Present In Hatchery-Produced Hard Clam Seed" (1997). VIMS Articles. 531. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/531 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jo11r11al of Shellfish Researrh. Vol. 16. o. 2. 519-52 1, 1997. EVIDENCE THAT QPX (QUAHOG PARASITE UNKNOWN) IS NOT PRESENT IN HATCHERY-PRODUCED HARD CLAM SEED SUSAN E. FORD,' ROX ANNA SlVIOLOWITZ,2 LISA 1\1. RAGONE CA LV0,3 ROBERT D. BARB ER,1 AND JOHN N. KRAlJETER1 1 Haskin Shellfish Research Laborarory lnsri1ure .for Marine and Coastal Sciences and Ne11· Jersey Agricultural Experi111e11r Sra1io11 R111gers University Por1 Norris, Ne111 Jersey 08345 2Labora101)' for Aquatic Anilnal Medicine and Pathology U11il'ersiry o,f Pennsyh·ania Marine Biological Laborarory \¥oods Hole.
    [Show full text]
  • Siliqua Patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida the Flat Razor Clam Family: Pharidae
    Phylum: Mollusca Siliqua patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida The flat razor clam Family: Pharidae Taxonomy: The familial designation of this (see Plate 397G, Coan and Valentich-Scott species has changed frequently over time. 2007). Previously in the Solenidae, current intertidal Body: (see Plate 29 Ricketts and Calvin guides include S. patula in the Pharidae (e.g., 1952; Fig 259 Kozloff 1993). Coan and Valentich-Scott 2007). The superfamily Solenacea includes infaunal soft Color: bottom dwelling bivalves and contains the two Interior: (see Fig 5, Pohlo 1963). families: Solenidae and Pharidae (= Exterior: Cultellidae, von Cosel 1993) (Remacha- Byssus: Trivino and Anadon 2006). In 1788, Dixon Gills: described S. patula from specimens collected Shell: The shell in S. patula is thin and with in Alaska (see Range) and Conrad described sharp (i.e., razor-like) edges and a thin profile the same species, under the name Solen (Fig. 4). Thin, long, fragile shell (Ricketts and nuttallii from specimens collected in the Calvin 1952), with gapes at both ends Columbia River in 1838 (Weymouth et al. (Haderlie and Abbott 1980). Shell smooth 1926). These names were later inside and out (Dixon 1789), elongate, rather synonymized, thus known synonyms for cylindrical and the length is about 2.5 times Siliqua patula include Solen nuttallii, the width. Solecurtus nuttallii. Occasionally, researchers Interior: Prominent internal vertical also indicate a subspecific epithet (e.g., rib extending from beak to margin (Haderlie Siliqua siliqua patula) or variations (e.g., and Abbott 1980). Siliqua patula var. nuttallii, based on rib Exterior: Both valves are similar and morphology, see Possible gape at both ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Panopea Abrupta ) Ecology and Aquaculture Production
    COMPREHENSIVE LITERATURE REVIEW AND SYNOPSIS OF ISSUES RELATING TO GEODUCK ( PANOPEA ABRUPTA ) ECOLOGY AND AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION Prepared for Washington State Department of Natural Resources by Kristine Feldman, Brent Vadopalas, David Armstrong, Carolyn Friedman, Ray Hilborn, Kerry Naish, Jose Orensanz, and Juan Valero (School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington), Jennifer Ruesink (Department of Biology, University of Washington), Andrew Suhrbier, Aimee Christy, and Dan Cheney (Pacific Shellfish Institute), and Jonathan P. Davis (Baywater Inc.) February 6, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................v 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 General life history ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Predator-prey interactions........................................................................... 2 1.3 Community and ecosystem effects of geoducks......................................... 2 1.4 Spatial structure of geoduck populations.................................................... 3 1.5 Genetic-based differences at the population level ...................................... 3 1.6 Commercial geoduck hatchery practices ...................................................
    [Show full text]