Renewable Fuel Standard Fill up on Facts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Renewable Fuel Standard Fill up on Facts Renewable Fuel Standard Fill Up On Facts America’s Oil and Natural Gas Industry November 2017 For the latest report, please visit www.api.org/policy-and-issues/fuels and www.filluponfacts.com Table of Contents Fill Up On Facts The RFS Needs Reform ...................................................................................Page 1 The Cost of Mandates ......................................................................................Page 2 The Reality of America’s Energy Revolution ......................................................Page 3 Outdated Supply and Demand Projections ......................................................Page 4 Disconnect Between EPA Mandate and Technology ........................................Page 5 What is “The Blend Wall?” ................................................................................Page 6 E15 and Your Car .............................................................................................Page 7, 8 Fairytale Thinking on E85 and Ethanol Mandates .............................................Page 9, 10 The RFS is Bad Policy: National and Multi-Industry Consensus .......................Page 11 A Bumpy Ride for Motorcyclists .......................................................................Page 12 Rising Ethanol Blends Don’t Float All Boats ......................................................Page 13, 14 Outdoor Power Equipment and the RFS ..........................................................Page 15, 16 Glossary ...........................................................................................................Page 17 Resources ........................................................................................................Page 18 The Renewable Fuel Standard: Fill Up On Facts | November 2017 The RFS Needs Reform Video: API’s Frank Macchiarola Video: API’s Jack Gerard Testimony on EPA’s proposal to reduce EPA should focus on potential the RFS volumes economic harm to consumers At the very top of EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard As for emissions, levels of carbon dioxide associated website, you’ll find this description of the program with electricity generation are near 30-year lows, devised by Congress in 2005 and expanded in 2007: primarily because of increased use of cleaner-burning natural gas. Congress created the renewable fuel standard (RFS) program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and “Congress can put in place common-sense, bipartisan expand the nation’s renewable fuels sector while reforms that advance sustainable fuels the right way – reducing reliance on imported oil. solutions that work for family farmers while protecting our water, wildlife, and economy.” Collin O’Mara, No question, the RFS was well-intentioned. But more president and CEO of the National Wildlife Federation than a decade later, here’s what we know about those top-line objectives set out by Congress: While the United States has made important climate progress and increased its energy security largely apart • First, while the United States is less reliant on from RFS contributions, the RFS itself continues to have imported crude oil – it’s mostly because of surging difficulties that could impact consumers and the overall domestic crude production, not creation of the RFS. economy. Frank Macchiarola, API downstream group director (pictured above), described some of these in • Greenhouse gas emissions have declined – primarily remarks at EPA’s public hearing in Washington. because increased use of cleaner-burning natural gas, not RFS mandates requiring ever-increasing EPA’s latest ethanol volume proposal – reducing volumes levels of ethanol in the nation’s gasoline supply. from unattainable levels set out by Congress a decade ago – is the right move, but more is needed. With EPA receiving public input on its proposed ethanol-use volumes for 2018, it’s important to see that America’s energy renaissance in natural gas and oil production is the biggest reason for the progress the U.S. has made toward those RFS objectives. The Renewable Fuel Standard: Page 1 Fill Up On Facts | November 2017 The Cost of Mandates Since the inception of the ethanol mandate a decade consumers money and choice, and threaten far higher ago, the United States has undergone an energy costs in the form of engine damage. transformation from a nation of energy dependence and scarcity to one of energy security and abundance. Furthermore, as stated by the EPA “Biofuels also tend America has significantly increased domestic crude to require subsidies and other market interventions to oil production and transitioned from a net importer of compete economically with fossil fuels, which creates refined petroleum products to a net exporter. It is well deadweight losses in the economy.”1 past time to reform outdated energy policies to reflect the energy realities of today and tomorrow. Simply stated, the RFS mandate creates potential harm to the American consumer. And it must be fixed. Surveys Today, most gasoline contains 10 percent ethanol by show that the American people agree, with nearly three- volume. However, if the Renewable Fuel Standard quarters of voters concerned about the potential harms (RFS) requirements continue to be implemented, created by the increasing prevalence of ethanol blends our nation could exceed this level of ethanol in the to over 10 percent of the fuel mix. The RFS has proven fuel mix. Extensive testing by the automotive and oil to be an unworkable program. industries shows higher ethanol blends may result in damaged engines and fuel systems for owners of Congress must repeal or significantly reform the the overwhelming majority of cars. Automakers have Renewable Fuel Standard to protect American warned these increased blends of ethanol could void consumers. car warranties. Increased RFS volumes could also cost 1. EPA, Economics of Biofuels, September 26, 2017, https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/economics-biofuels The Renewable Fuel Standard: Page 2 Fill Up On Facts | November 2017 The Reality of America’s Energy Revolution Increased U.S. Crude Oil Production: Primary Factor in Declining Crude Import (change in fuel source: 2008 to 2017) 4500 415,000 barrels per day 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 4061,000 barrels per day 1500 1000 500 0 -500 thousand barrels per day thousand barrels -1000 -1500 -2000 -2518,000 barrels per day -2500 -3000 Domestic Ethanol Production Domestic Crude Production Net Imports Source: EIA Monthly Energy Review. Accessed April 23, 2013 When Congress created the Renewable Fuel Standard Second, a viable domestic cellulosic biofuels industry (RFS) more than a decade ago, lawmakers hoped has not taken hold, with only a tiny fraction of the fuel the federal fuels program would spur development of mandated by the RFS actually being produced. a domestic biofuels industry that would help reduce oil imports with millions and millions of gallons of The fact is, Congressional mandates have failed to homegrown ethanol – with a particular focus on produce cellulosic biofuel and expand the domestic increasing volumes of cellulosic biofuel made from biofuels industry as envisioned, and our new energy corn stover, wood chips, miscanthus or other cellulosic realities have made the RFS obsolete. It is a broken feedstocks. By 2022, it was expected that 16 billion and outdated policy. Americans are not consuming as gallons of cellulosic biofuel would be produced, but a much gasoline as Congress estimated they would when couple of other things happened instead. the mandate was passed in 2007. That means RFS mandates could push higher ethanol concentrations into First, the U.S. energy revolution happened. Our crude gasoline than today’s vehicles or refueling infrastructure oil imports fell mostly because of surging domestic were designed to accommodate. oil production, not the RFS. Through safe hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, American output grew from less than 6 million barrels per day to more than 9 million barrels per day – the growth in domestic production more than accounting for the reduction in net imports. The Renewable Fuel Standard: Page 3 Fill Up On Facts | November 2017 Outdated Supply and Demand Projections Motor Gasoline Consumption 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 hundred billion gallons per year hundred 1.2 1.1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 AOE 2007 Actual and Projected Source:Source U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 tenth of one percent of the volume congress had hoped (EISA) was legislation enacted under the assumptions for was actually produced. of declining domestic production of crude oil and far greater crude oil imports. Both of these assumptions Declining gasoline demand, combined with increasing have been completely reversed by the shale oil mandates, means we are at the limit of blending ethanol revolution, dramatically increasing North American into gasoline (10 percent ethanol or E10) for widespread energy production and increasing crude oil exports. The use. The EPA rushed through approval in allowing a U.S. is now a global oil and natural gas superpower— blended fuel with up to 15 percent ethanol (E15) without not because of biofuels, but through investment in the oil adequate testing. In addition to compatibility problems and gas industry and increases in domestic production. with E15, expanded use of another alternative fuel (E85) Our domestic oil and natural gas industry is achieving has not occurred due to poor consumer
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Bio- Ethanol and Biogas Initiatives for Transport in Sweden
    Assessment of bio- ethanol and biogas initiatives for transport in Sweden Background information for the EU-project PREMIA EU Contract N° TREN/04/FP6EN/S07.31083/503081 May 2005 2 Abstract This report is the result of an assignment on assessment of bio-ethanol and biogas initiatives for transport in Sweden, granted by VTT Processes, Energy and Environment, Engines and Vehicles, Finland to Atrax Energi AB, Sweden. The report of the assignment is intended to append the literature and other information used in the “PREMIA” project The work has been carried out by Björn Rehnlund, Atrax Energi AB, Sweden, with support from Martijn van Walwijk, France. The report describes the development of the production and use of biobio-ethanol and biogas (biomass based methane) as vehicle fuels in Sweden and gives an overview of today’s situation. Besides data and information about numbers of vehicles and filling stations, the report also gives an overview of: • Stakeholders • The legal framework, including standards, specifications, type approval, taxation etc. • Financial support programs. Public acceptance, side effects and the effect off the introduction of bio-ethanol and biogas as vehicle fuels on climate gases are to some extent also discussed in this report. It can be concluded that since the early 1990’s Sweden has had a perhaps slow but steadily increasing use of bio-ethanol and biogas. Today having the EC directive on promotion of bio bio-fuels and other renewable fuels in place the development and introduction of filling stations and vehicles has started to increase rapidly. From 1994 to 2004 the number of filling stations for bio-ethanol grew from 1 to 100 and during the year 2004 until today to 160 stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis
    Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis Caley Johnson, Anelia Milbrandt, Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-76011 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC May 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis Caley Johnson, Anelia Milbrandt, Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Johnson, Caley, Anelia Milbrandt, and Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe. 2020. Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-76011. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/76011.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-76011 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC May 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Biofuels on the Market
    Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Report Delft, July 2013 Author(s): Bettina Kampman (CE Delft) Ruud Verbeek (TNO) Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft) Pim van Mensch (TNO) Harry Croezen (CE Delft) Artur Patuleia (TNO) Publication Data Bibliographical data: Bettina Kampman (CE Delft), Ruud Verbeek (TNO), Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft), Pim van Mensch (TNO), Harry Croezen (CE Delft), Artur Patuleia (TNO) Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Delft, CE Delft, July 2013 Fuels / Renewable / Blends / Increase / Market / Scenarios / Policy / Technical / Measures / Standards FT: Biofuels Publication code: 13.4567.46 CE Delft publications are available from www.cedelft.eu Commissioned by: The European Commission, DG Energy. Further information on this study can be obtained from the contact person, Bettina Kampman. Disclaimer: This study Bringing biofuels on the market. Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits was produced for the European Commission by the consortium of CE Delft and TNO. The views represented in the report are those of its authors and do not represent the views or official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. © copyright, CE Delft, Delft CE Delft Committed to the Environment CE Delft is an independent research and consultancy organisation specialised in developing structural and innovative solutions to environmental problems. CE Delft’s solutions are characterised in being politically feasible, technologically sound, economically prudent and socially equitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol Flexible Fuel Vehicle Conversion Kits: Alternative Fuels
    Alternative Fuels Data Center: Technology Bulletin - Ethanol Flexible Fuel Vehicle Conversion Kits August 2007 Ethanol Flexible Fuel Vehicle Conversion Kits Rising gasoline prices and concerns about climate change have greatly increased public interest in ethanol use. Vehicle manufacturers currently offer ethanol flex-fuel vehicles (FFVs) in a wide variety of makes and models at little or no extra cost. In spite of the availability of new and used FFVs, many consumers are curious about the prospects for converting their existing gasoline vehicles to operate on ethanol. ● Background ● Regulatory Requirements ● Certification Process Overview ● Status of Ethanol Conversion Certifications ● On-board Diagnostics (OBD) Approval Letter ● Resources Background The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) implements regulations under the Clean Air Act that require certification of new vehicles as being compliant with emissions requirements (see the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 85 and 86). Certification is granted to the manufacturer for specific vehicle configurations operating on specific fuels according to an established test protocol. Installing or modifying a fuel system to allow a vehicle to operate on a fuel other than that for which it was originally certified is considered tampering—a violation of federal regulations that carries a significant fine. There are currently no certified aftermarket conversion systems that would allow a conventional gasoline vehicle to operate on E85. EPA does have a process by which manufacturers of conversion systems or "kits" can obtain a Certificate of Conformity for converted vehicles. In recent years, manufacturers of natural gas and propane conversions have used this process to certify several vehicles for operation on these fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Ethanol and Iso-Butanol Blends on Gaseous and Particulate
    Energy 82 (2015) 168e179 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/energy The impact of ethanol and iso-butanol blends on gaseous and particulate emissions from two passenger cars equipped with spray-guided and wall-guided direct injection SI (spark ignition) engines * Georgios Karavalakis a, b, , Daniel Short a, b, Diep Vu a, b, Robert L. Russell a, Akua Asa-Awuku a, b, Heejung Jung a, c, Kent C. Johnson a, b, Thomas D. Durbin a, b a University of California, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), 1084 Columbia Avenue, Riverside, CA 92507, USA b Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA c Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA article info abstract Article history: We examined the effects of different ethanol and iso-butanol blends on the gaseous and particulate Received 2 August 2014 emissions from two passenger cars equipped with spark ignition direct injection engines and with one Received in revised form spray-guided and one wall-guided configuration. Both vehicles were tested over triplicate FTP (Federal 3 December 2014 Test Procedure) and UC (Unified Cycles) using a chassis dynamometer. Emissions of THC (total hydro- Accepted 8 January 2015 carbons), NMHC (non-methane hydrocarbons), and CO (carbon monoxide) reduced with increasing Available online 7 February 2015 oxygen content in the blend for some of the vehicle/fuel combinations, whereas NOx (nitrogen oxide) emissions did not show strong fuel effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol-Blended Gasoline • Module 27 Page 1 Ethanol-Blended Gasoline
    …Introduction: TankSmart Operator Training • Class A/B Operators • Training Class C Operators • Annual UST System Inspections • Record Keeping • Spills: Cleanup & Reporting • Safety • Tanks: Double-Walled w/ Continuous Electronic Monitoring • Tanks: Double-Walled w/ Manual Monitoring • Tanks: Single-Walled • Daily Inventory & Statistical Inventory Analysis • Automatic Tank Gauges (ATGs) • Piping: Double-Walled Systems • Piping: Single-Walled Systems • Piping: Pressurized Pumping Systems • Piping: Suction Pumping Systems • Overfill Prevention: Ball Floats • Overfill Prevention: Electronic Alarms • Overfill Prevention: Drop-Tube Shutoff Valves • Spill Buckets • Cathodic Protection for Tanks & Piping • Stage I Vapor Recovery • Dispensers • Out-of-Service Tanks • Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) • Heating Oil/Generator Tanks • Ethanol-Blended Gasoline • Module 27 Page 1 ETHANOL-BLENDED GASOLINE Now that ethanol is routinely blended with gasoline in Maine (typically Now that ethanol 10% ethanol with 90% gasoline, known as E10), UST owners and operators is routinely blended must pay attention to several new fuel-storage and fuel-quality-related issues. with gasoline in These issues may cause leaks in tanks, piping, and/or dispensers, and so have an environmental aspect to them as well. Maine (typically 10% ethanol with The potential issues you should be aware of regarding storing, distributing, and 90% gasoline, dispensing ethanol blended fuels are: known as E10), Compatibility with system components UST owners and operators must pay Phase
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments to Collect Dimensioning Data for Production of Biogas and Ethanol from Straw
    Experiments to collect dimensioning data for production of biogas and ethanol from straw Graduation Thesis Made by: Judit Szászi Supervisor: Dr. Erik Dahlquist Mälardalen University Department of Public Technology Consultant: Dr. József Kovács University of Pannonia Institute of Environmental Engineering Pannon University Mälardalen University Engineering Faculty School of Sustainable Society and Institute of Technology Development (HST) Environmental Engineering Västerås-Veszprém 2008 THESIS ASSIGNMENT FOR MASTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS Department Major Institute of Environmental technology Environmental Engineering Title of thesis: Experiments to collect dimensioning data for production of biogas and ethanol from straw Task leading department(s): Supervisor(s): Mälardalen University, Erik Dahlquist School of Sustainable Society and Dr. Kovács József Technology Development (HST) Task to be executed: There is a long project at Malardalens Högskola about preparation bioethanol and biogas from energy crops. During the processing of the available and personally selected literature former experiments should be summarized as well. The procedure of the production of biogas and bioethanol from straw has to be highly emphasized. In the practical research the extraction from straw should be examined considering different conditions such as temperature, pH, and extraction time. Thereafter biogasification is the aim, with bacteria to form CH4 and ethanol fermentation with Saccaromyces will be performed and the gas production measured. On the basis of these experimental results the candidate should trace the main directions of upcoming research. This will give information on rough dimensioning data for a future pilot plant. Special requirements: Well established knowledge of environmental engineering and of English language , the perfection in extraction and fermentation. Deadlines of the distinct parts of the project 1.
    [Show full text]
  • System Dynamics Modeling of Corn Ethanol As a Bio Transportation Fuel in the United States
    System Dynamics Modeling of Corn Ethanol as a Bio Transportation Fuel in the United States Deogratias Kibira1, Guodong Shao1, and Stephen Nowak2 1Manufacturing Systems Integration Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA; 2Franciscan University of Steubenville, Steubenville, OH 43952, USA. Abstract The production capacity of corn ethanol as a transportation fuel is experiencing rapid growth in the United States. The demand is driven by increased prices of gasoline, government mandates, incentives, desire for cleaner fuels, and the need to achieve energy independence. Continued strong growth of the corn ethanol industry will depend on profitability by both suppliers and producers. This in turn will be influenced by several factors such as demand, government incentives, feedstock availability and prices, processing plant capacity, and efficient farm and ethanol processing technologies. How and to what extent will the projected growth of the corn ethanol industry in the United States be influenced by some or all of these factors? We use system dynamics modeling to construct the causal-loop structure of the corn ethanol industry and a stock and flow diagrams to explore how changes in projected factors will affect the industry. Currently, planners and researchers explore various energy supply options by the year 2030, when world energy usage is expected to double that of 2009. By developing and executing a system dynamics model, this paper explores different possible growth scenarios of the industry for the next twenty one years. Keywords: Renewable energy; Energy independence; Corn ethanol production; System dynamics 1. Introduction The United States (U.S.) is facing increasing energy costs and environmental pressures calling for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil Biofuels Annual 2019
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 8/9/2019 GAIN Report Number: BR19029 Brazil Biofuels Annual 2019 Approved By: Oliver Flake, Agricultural Counselor Prepared By: Sergio Barros, Agricultural Specialist Report Highlights: The National Biofuels Policy of Brazil, the RenovaBio program, is expected to be implemented in late December 2019. Over forty biofuel plants have requested the certification process. Brazil’s total 2019 ethanol production is estimated at 34.45 billion liters, an increase of four percent compared to the revised figure for 2018. Total domestic demand for ethanol (fuel and other uses) for calendar year 2019 is estimated at 33.93 billion liters. Total Brazilian biodiesel production is estimated at 5.8 billion liters, an eight percent increase relative to 2018, based on the projected modest growth of the Brazilian economy and the increase of the biodiesel blend to eleven percent (B11) beginning in September 2019. I. Executive Summary The RenovaBio Program is designed to support Brazil’s COP21 goals. RenovaBio was launched in December 2016 by the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) and was instituted as the “National Biofuels Policy”. The program is expected to be effective by late December 2019. The RenovaBio operation is based on three main instruments: 1. annual carbon intensity reduction targets (gCO2/MJ) for a minimum period of ten years, 2. certification of biofuels by efficiency in reducing GHG emissions, and 3. Decarbonization Credits (CBIO). On June 28, the European Union and Mercosur reached a provisional agreement on a free trade agreement (FTA), concluding two decades of talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Behavior of Fuel Ethanol
    EPA/600/R-09/037 | April 2009 | www.epa.gov/athens Composition and Behavior of Fuel Ethanol Ecosystems Research Division, Athens, GA 30605 National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development EPA/600/R-09/037 April 2009 Composition and Behavior of Fuel Ethanol by James W. Weaver(a) Sheldon A. Skaggs(b) (a) David L. Spidle (c) Guthrie C. Stone (a) Ecosystems Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia (b) Sheldon Skaggs, Inc, Athens, Georgia (c) The University of Georgia, Athens Georgia Ecosystems Research Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development United States Environmental Protection Agency Athens, Georgia 30605 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20460 Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development funded and managed the research described here. It has been subjected to the Agency=s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. The information provided in this paper is not intended for determining compliance with state or federal regulations for air quality, gasoline composition or other similar purposes. For these purposes, information should be obtained from the appropriate local, state and federal regulatory agencies, the Clean Air Act, the United States Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, the Federal Register and other sources. 2 Abstract Ethanol usage in the United States has increased due in part to the elimination of methyl tert-butyl ether from the fuel supply and to the mandates of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol for Motor Fuels Fact Sheet No
    Alcohol for Motor Fuels Fact Sheet No. 5.010 Farm and Ranch Series|Equipment by J.L. Smith and J.P. Workman* Revised by A. Drenth and P. Cabot** Quick Facts Alcohol has been used as a fuel for increase the engine compression ratio. internal combustion engines since their Increases in compression ratio increase • Alcohols burn more invention. Reports on the use of alcohol as the efficiency of converting the potential completely then petroleum- a motor fuel were published in 1907 and combustion energy to power. Finally, alcohols based fuels, thus increasing detailed research was conducted in the 1920s burn more completely, thus increasing combustion efficiency. and 1930s. Historically, the level of interest combustion efficiency. • Advantages of mixing alcohol in using alcohol as a motor fuel has followed cycles of petroleum-based fuel shortages with gasoline are that alcohol and/or low feed-grain prices. More recently, Disadvantages of Alcohol tends to increase the octane the use of alcohol and other renewable fuels There are many disadvantages to using rating and reduce carbon has been driven by governmental mandates alcohols, particularly methyl and ethyl monoxide and other tailpipe to reduce engine emissions and increase alcohol. Although these alcohols, when used emissions. renewable fuel use. Ethyl alcohol (ethanol) near their stoichiometric air-fuel ratios, • There are many is the primary domestically produced produce more power, a larger quantity of renewable fuel in the U.S. today. Currently, fuel is required to produce a specified power disadvantages to using most U.S. ethanol production is from output. For example, in an automobile, more alcohols, particularly methyl corn, where the starch in the corn kernel fuel is required for each mile driven.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Fuels and Fleet Efficiency
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE About Alternative Fuels What is an E85 flexible-fuel vehicle? Flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) are designed to run on gasoline or a blend of up to Alternative Fuels 85%ethanol (E85). Except for a few engine and fuel system modifications, they are iden- ALTERNATIVE tical to gasoline-only models. FFVs have been produced since the 1980s, and dozens FUELS of models are currently available. Since FFVs look just like gasoline-only models, you may What are Biofuels? Biofuels, which are have an FFV and not even know it. AND FLEET used primarily for transportation, are liquid How can I tell if my vehicle can run off of fuels produced from biomass materials. Biofu- EFFICIENCY els refer to ethanol and biodiesel. Biofuels are E85? E85 window stickers have been sent to made by converting various forms of biomass USDA agencies and should be placed in the such as corn or animal fat into liquid fuels and vehicle. Also, General Motors has identified can be used as replacements or additives for their E85 capable vehicles with a yellow gas gasoline or diesel. Biofuels generally have lower cap since2006. An E85 vehicle can be identi- life-cycle carbon dioxide emissions than do fied by the Vehicle Identification Number their fossil fuel counterparts. (contact OPPM for assistance). What is E85 ethanol? E85 ethanol is an alternative fuel to gasoline. It's a high- octane, cleaner-burning fuel that's a blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. Ethanol is domestically produced and mostly re- newable, typically produced from grain, switch grass, willow, and other biomass resources.
    [Show full text]