DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy in 2020: Assessing the Economic Effects Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy in 2020: Assessing the Economic Effects Of Energy in 2020: Assessing the Economic Efects of Commercialization of Cellulosic Ethanol by Stefan Osborne Ofce of Competition and Economic Analysis Executive Summary • Te primary benefciaries of commercially viable cellulosic ethanol production would be U.S. dependence on imports of crude oil has crop-producing U.S. industries and their sup- steadily increased for three decades. One way to pliers. Te increase in output over baseline Manufacturing and Services reduce this dependence is to increase domestic projections from these sectors would range production of renewable fuels such as etha- from 2.4 percent to 4.3 percent in 2020. U.S. Competitiveness Report nol. Tis report examines the efect on the U.S. agriculture could gain 20,350 jobs at the ex- November 2007 economy in 2020 if advances in technology allow pense of other sectors. cellulosic ethanol to become commercially viable and if cellulosic ethanol production becomes • Conversely, lower prices for crude oil would adequate to allow total ethanol production to hurt U.S. oil producers, although the motor reach 30 billion gallons (including 10.5 billion fuel producing industry would beneft from gallons of corn-based ethanol). In this report, “oil” lower input prices. and “crude oil” are used interchangeably, unless Two critical factors that infuence our impact otherwise noted. Our fndings, based on produc- assessments are our assumptions on (a) the tion of 19.5 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol in cost-competitiveness of cellulosic ethanol and (b) 2020, indicate the following: the volume of production of cellulosic ethanol in • Compared with current projections for 2020, 2020. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the U.S. U.S. crude oil imports would be 4.1 percent economy would beneft even if we assume that lower than projected, amounting to a dif- cellulosic ethanol is only cost-competitive when ference of about 460,000 barrels per day. world oil prices are $60 per barrel, rather than Furthermore, the worldwide price of oil and the $50-per-barrel assumption used in the base the domestic U.S. fuel price would be 1.2 per- scenario. Our fndings further suggest that the cent and 2.0 percent, respectively, lower than benefts are roughly proportional to the volume projected. of cellulosic ethanol produced domestically. In a best-case scenario where enough cellulosic • Te annual benefts to U.S. consumers of in- feedstock is available to produce 49.5 billion gal- creased cellulosic ethanol production would lons of cellulosic ethanol in 2020 and the world be $12.6 billion in 2020. Expressed in terms of price of crude oil is $50 per barrel, U.S. crude oil today’s economy, that amount is equivalent to imports in 2020 would be lowered by 1.2 million about 40 percent of the gains in real income barrels per day over baseline projections and U.S. that would accrue to the United States from agriculture would gain 54,000 jobs compared eliminating all restraints on imports. with current baseline projections. Our analysis does not take into account all factors gallons in both cases, with the remaining ethanol determining the costs associated with additional production coming from cellulosic feedstock.2,3 cellulosic ethanol use, such as the transitional Tis report assesses the projected benefts to the investments necessary to replace crude oil with U.S. economy and industries if price and volume ethanol in the U.S. fuel supply. Similarly, this targets are met. report does not address all the economic benefts To assess the economic impacts of meeting those associated with expanded cellulosic ethanol use, targets, we constructed a simplifed facsimile such as reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the U.S. economy in 2020. Tis facsimile is resulting from decreased petroleum consump- consistent with forecasts of macroeconomic tion. Given that transition costs are likely to be variables and energy prices released by the incurred only once, whereas the benefts would Energy Information Administration (EIA) An- accrue each year, the value of the stream of nual Energy Outlook 2006 (AEO). Te facsimile benefts from cellulosic ethanol production likely provides a snapshot of how the U.S. economy exceeds the one-time transition costs. would look in 2020 without commercially viable Tis report assesses the impact of cellulosic cellulosic ethanol. We then assumed that 19.5 ethanol production from a U.S. economy-wide billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol could be perspective. Te report uses a computable general produced at the Department of Energy (DOE) equilibrium model that tracks 500 industry sectors. target cost of $1.07 per gallon, so that total ethanol production (corn-based and cellulosic combined) would replace 10 percent of the crude oil inputs Introduction used in gasoline and distillates. Te fndings are presented by comparing the alternate picture of Te United States is importing an increasing the 2020 economy with the EIA’s original or base share of the petroleum that it consumes each projection. Te report also examines a best-case year and world petroleum prices are projected to outlook, in which 49.5 billion gallons of cellu- remain high over the next few decades. Without losic ethanol could be produced in 2020, and an alternative sources of transportation fuel, the U.S. alternate scenario where the $1.07 per gallon cost economy could face adverse economic and politi- target is not met.4 cal consequences. An understanding of the changes likely to occur Few viable alternatives exist for the crude oil in the petroleum and agricultural markets is es- used in transportation fuels. Although ethanol sential to gauge the benefts to the U.S. economy manufactured from corn can be used to replace associated with increased production and use of gasoline, corn-based ethanol can replace only a cellulosic ethanol. Te study begins, therefore, limited amount of U.S. crude oil consumption. with a description of the state of the world market However, much more ethanol could be manufac- for crude oil, including trends that are leading tured from the cellulosic materials in biomass, to higher world prices in the long run. Te study such as crop and forestry residues, energy crops, then explains the diferent methods for reducing and wood wastes. U.S. demand for petroleum, with ethanol as the Because cellulosic ethanol is not yet commercially primary option for directly replacing the petro- viable, the benefts of cellulosic ethanol produc- leum used in vehicle fuel. Te current market for tion can be realized only if its production costs corn-based ethanol and the potential for cel- are reduced. Te magnitude of benefts gained lulosic ethanol production are explained next. will depend on the degree of cost reduction and Te report concludes by describing the projected the volume of cellulosic ethanol produced do- benefts to the U.S. economy if 19.5 billion gallons mestically. Te DOE has set a target for reducing of cellulosic ethanol can be used to replace the cellulosic ethanol’s production costs to $1.07 per petroleum used for vehicle fuel. Efects on specifc gallon by 2012. Available literature indicates that U.S. industries are also highlighted. annual ethanol production (both corn-based and cellulosic) could range from 30 billion gallons to 60 billion gallons in 2020.1 Annual production of corn-based ethanol would be about 10.5 billion 2 U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Long-Term Demand Rising; World oil supplies have become tight in recent Prices for Crude Oil Worldwide Will years primarily because of strong demand from Remain High the United States and from developing countries in Asia, including China and India. Te United States Te need to consider alternative fuels like cel- consumes about one-quarter of the world’s petro- lulosic ethanol is driven largely by high crude oil leum production. Developing countries in Asia, prices and energy security. Not only are crude including China and India, have enjoyed strong oil prices relatively high at present, but the EIA recent economic growth and have also become forecasts that crude oil prices will continue to important users of petroleum. According to EIA be high, reaching $50 a barrel (in 2004 prices) in forecasts, daily petroleum consumption by 2030 2020. Te increases in crude oil price will follow will rise by 5.4 million barrels over current levels a decline between 2007 and 2014, when world in the United States and by 13.6 million barrels crude oil prices are forecast to fall to $46.90 per in developing Asian economies. Daily petroleum barrel as new crude oil supplies enter the market consumption will grow by 9.7 million barrels per (see Figure 1). day in the rest of the world by 2030 (see Figure 2). Figure 1. CrudeFigure 1. Crude Oil PriceOil Price ForcastForecast in 2004in 2004 Dollars, Dollars, 2004–20 2004–20 Source:Figure Energy 1. CrudeInformation Oil Administration, Price Forecast Annual in Energy 2004 Outlook Dollars, 2006 (Washington,2004–20 D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, 2006), availableSource: Energy at www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/pdf/aeotab_12.xls. Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, 2006), 70 available at www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/pdf/aeotab_12.xls. 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 dollars per barrel 30 U.S. 30 U.S. dollars per barrel 20 20 10 10 0 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, 2006), available at www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/pdf/aeotab_12.xls.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Still Limiting the Deployment of Cellulosic Ethanol? Analysis of the Current Status of the Sector
    applied sciences Review What is still Limiting the Deployment of Cellulosic Ethanol? Analysis of the Current Status of the Sector Monica Padella *, Adrian O’Connell and Matteo Prussi European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate C-Energy, Transport and Climate, Energy Efficiency and Renewables Unit C.2-Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy; [email protected] (A.O.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 September 2019; Accepted: 15 October 2019; Published: 24 October 2019 Abstract: Ethanol production from cellulosic material is considered one of the most promising options for future biofuel production contributing to both the energy diversification and decarbonization of the transport sector, especially where electricity is not a viable option (e.g., aviation). Compared to conventional (or first generation) ethanol production from food and feed crops (mainly sugar and starch based crops), cellulosic (or second generation) ethanol provides better performance in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings and low risk of direct and indirect land-use change. However, despite the policy support (in terms of targets) and significant R&D funding in the last decade (both in EU and outside the EU), cellulosic ethanol production appears to be still limited. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the status of cellulosic ethanol production in EU and outside EU, reviewing available literature and highlighting technical and non-technical barriers that still limit its production at commercial scale. The review shows that the cellulosic ethanol sector appears to be still stagnating, characterized by technical difficulties as well as high production costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Providing Incentives for Bio-Energy While Protecting Established Biomass-Based Industries1 2
    POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE AND ENERGY POLICY ON FOREST SECTOR INDUSTRIES: PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR BIO-ENERGY 1 2 WHILE PROTECTING ESTABLISHED BIOMASS-BASED INDUSTRIES 3 DR. JIM BOWYER DOVETAIL PARTNERS, INC. JUNE 2011 1 The work upon which this publication is based was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the Wood Education and Resource Center, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, U.S. Forest Service. 2 In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Bowyer is Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, and Director of the Responsible Materials Program within Dovetail Partners. Executive Summary Current and proposed climate and energy policy, and specifically incentives for the development of bioenergy have the potential to negatively impact established biomass- based industries through increased costs, competition for supplies, and perhaps other unidentified cause and effect relationships. This report assesses short and long-term impacts (both positive and negative) of state and federal climate and bioenergy policies and incentives on the domestic forestry/wood products sector, and in particular the logging, lumber, composite panels, and paper industries, and considers how incentive programs might be modified so as to achieve optimum results for bioenergy producers and established wood-based industries alike.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sustainability of Cellulosic Biofuels
    The Sustainability of Cellulosic Biofuels All biofuels, by definition, are made from plant material. The main biofuel on the U.S. market is corn ethanol, a type of biofuel made using the starch in corn grain. But only using grain to produce biofuels can lead to a tug of war between food and fuel sources, as well as other environmental and economic challenges. Biofuels made from cellulosic sources – the leaves, stems, and other fibrous parts of a plant – have been touted as a promising renewable energy source. Not only is cellulose the most abundant biological material on Earth, but using cellulose to produce biofuels instead of grain can have environmental benefits. Cellulosic biofuel sources offer a substantially greater energy return on investment compared to grain-based sources. However, environmental benefits are not guaranteed. The environmental success of cellulosic biofuels will depend on 1) which cellulosic crops are grown, 2) the practices used to manage them, and 3) the geographic location of crops. Both grain-based and cellulosic biofuels can help lessen our use of fossil fuels and can help offset carbon dioxide emissions. But cellulosic biofuels are able to offset more gasoline than can grain-based biofuels – and they do so with environmental co-benefits. Cellulosic Biofuels Help Reduce Competition for Land Cellulosic fuel crops can grow on lands that are not necessarily suitable for food crops and thereby reduce or avoid food vs. fuel competition. If grown on land that has already been cleared, cellulosic crops do not further contribute to the release of carbon to the atmosphere. Because many cellulosic crops are perennial and roots are always present, they guard against soil erosion and better retain nitrogen fertilizer.
    [Show full text]
  • For Cellulosic Ethanol Production 1 DESCRIPTION of the Formicobio
    Appendix 1 formicobio™ technology 1 (2) for cellulosic ethanol production 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE formicobio™ TECHNOLOGY Chempolis’ formicobio™ is a technology for the production of cellulosic sugars and further ethanol. The technology has been specially developed for non-food raw materials (e.g. bamboo, bagasse, straws, oil palm biomass, and other agricultural residues), and it is based on selective fractionation of biomass with fully recoverable biosolvent containing formic acid. The formicobio™ technology avoids the main problems associated with other technologies developed for non-food raw materials and represents a true third- generation (3G) technology for the production of cellulosic sugars and further ethanol. The technology enables co-production of platform chemicals, such as acetic acid and furfural, which are used as raw materials in the production of paints, adhesives, and plastics, and as solvent and raw material for resins. Furfural can also be converted into synthetic diesel or gasoline ingredient by hydrogenation. In addition, combustion of co-produced solid biofuel (biocoal) can generate all the energy needed in biorefinery, with some surplus to be used in other production. The formicobio™ technology offers two principal options for the production of cellulosic ethanol: a) Production of ethanol from cellulose and chemicals from hemicelluloses b) Production of ethanol from cellulose and hemicelluloses with co-production of chemicals from hemicelluloses The principle of the technology (Option a) has been described as a simple block diagram in the picture below. The main steps in the process are the following: ‐ Selective fractionation of biomass with a fully recoverable biosolvent (i.e. formicodeli™). Fractionation takes place in a much lower temperature and pressure than pretreatment in typical 2G technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Bio- Ethanol and Biogas Initiatives for Transport in Sweden
    Assessment of bio- ethanol and biogas initiatives for transport in Sweden Background information for the EU-project PREMIA EU Contract N° TREN/04/FP6EN/S07.31083/503081 May 2005 2 Abstract This report is the result of an assignment on assessment of bio-ethanol and biogas initiatives for transport in Sweden, granted by VTT Processes, Energy and Environment, Engines and Vehicles, Finland to Atrax Energi AB, Sweden. The report of the assignment is intended to append the literature and other information used in the “PREMIA” project The work has been carried out by Björn Rehnlund, Atrax Energi AB, Sweden, with support from Martijn van Walwijk, France. The report describes the development of the production and use of biobio-ethanol and biogas (biomass based methane) as vehicle fuels in Sweden and gives an overview of today’s situation. Besides data and information about numbers of vehicles and filling stations, the report also gives an overview of: • Stakeholders • The legal framework, including standards, specifications, type approval, taxation etc. • Financial support programs. Public acceptance, side effects and the effect off the introduction of bio-ethanol and biogas as vehicle fuels on climate gases are to some extent also discussed in this report. It can be concluded that since the early 1990’s Sweden has had a perhaps slow but steadily increasing use of bio-ethanol and biogas. Today having the EC directive on promotion of bio bio-fuels and other renewable fuels in place the development and introduction of filling stations and vehicles has started to increase rapidly. From 1994 to 2004 the number of filling stations for bio-ethanol grew from 1 to 100 and during the year 2004 until today to 160 stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Biodiesel and Renewable Di
    141.422 Definitions for KRS 141.422 to 141.425. As used in KRS 141.422 to 141.425: (1) "Annual biodiesel and renewable diesel tax credit cap" means: (a) For calendar years beginning prior to January 1, 2008, one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000); (b) For the calendar year beginning on January 1, 2008, five million dollars ($5,000,000); (c) For calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, but before January 1, 2021, ten million dollars ($10,000,000); (2) "Annual biodiesel, renewable diesel, and renewable chemical production tax credit cap" means, for calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2021, ten million dollars ($10,000,000); (3) "Annual cellulosic ethanol tax credit cap" means five million dollars ($5,000,000), unless the annual cellulosic ethanol tax credit cap is modified pursuant to KRS 141.4248, in which case the cap established by KRS 141.4248 shall be the annual cellulosic ethanol tax credit cap for that year. Any adjustments to the annual cellulosic ethanol tax credit cap made pursuant to KRS 141.4248 shall be made on an annual basis and shall not carry forward to subsequent years; (4) "Annual ethanol tax credit cap" means five million dollars ($5,000,000), unless the annual credit cap is modified pursuant to KRS 141.4248, in which case the cap established by KRS 141.4248 shall be the annual ethanol tax credit cap for that year. Any adjustments to the annual ethanol tax credit cap made pursuant to KRS 141.4248 shall be made on an annual basis and shall not carry forward to subsequent years;
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis
    Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis Caley Johnson, Anelia Milbrandt, Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-76011 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC May 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis Caley Johnson, Anelia Milbrandt, Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Johnson, Caley, Anelia Milbrandt, and Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe. 2020. Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-76011. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/76011.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-76011 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC May 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Rotation Intensive Culture of Willow, Spent Mushroom Substrate
    plants Article Short Rotation Intensive Culture of Willow, Spent Mushroom Substrate and Ramial Chipped Wood for Bioremediation of a Contaminated Site Used for Land Farming Activities of a Former Petrochemical Plant Maxime Fortin Faubert 1 , Mohamed Hijri 1,2 and Michel Labrecque 1,* 1 Institut de Recherche en biologie végétale, Université de Montréal and Jardin Botanique de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke East, Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada; [email protected] (M.F.F.); [email protected] (M.H.) 2 African Genome Center, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Lot 660, Hay Moulay Rachid, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-514-978-1862 Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the bioremediation impacts of willows grown in short rotation intensive culture (SRIC) and supplemented or not with spent mushroom substrate (SMS) and ramial chipped wood (RCW). Results did not show that SMS significantly improved either biomass production or phytoremediation efficiency. After the three growing seasons, RCW- amended S. miyabeana accumulated significantly more Zn in the shoots, and greater increases of some PAHs were found in the soil of RCW-amended plots than in the soil of the two other ground Citation: Fortin Faubert, M.; Hijri, cover treatments’ plots. Significantly higher Cd concentrations were found in the shoots of cultivar M.; Labrecque, M. Short Rotation ‘SX61’. The results suggest that ‘SX61’ have reduced the natural attenuation of C10-C50 that occurred Intensive Culture of Willow, Spent in the unvegetated control plots. The presence of willows also tended to increase the total soil Mushroom Substrate and Ramial concentrations of PCBs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implications of Increased Use of Wood for Biofuel Production
    Date Issue Brief # ISSUE BRIEF The Implications of Increased Use of Wood for Biofuel Production Roger A. Sedjo and Brent Sohngen June 2009 Issue Brief # 09‐04 Resources for the Future Resources for the Future is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that, through its social science research, enables policymakers and stakeholders to make better, more informed decisions about energy, environmental, natural resource, and public health issues. Headquartered in Washington, DC, its research scope comprises programs in nations around the world. 1616 P Street NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org PAGE 2 SEDJO AND SOHNGEN | RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE The Implications of Increased Use of Wood for Biofuel Production Roger A. Sedjo and Brent Sohngen1 Introduction The growing reliance in the United States and many other industrial countries on foreign petroleum has generated increasing concerns. Since the 1970s, many administrations have called for energy independence, with a particular focus on petroleum. Although energy sources are many, the transport sector is driven largely by petroleum. Despite calls for reduced oil imports, the United States increasingly depends on foreign supply sources. General concerns about the security of petroleum supply are compounded by added concerns about the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from fossil energy, including petroleum. While the United States did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, efforts are increasing to find alternatives to petroleum as the dominant transport fuel. The major impediment to alternative fuels is generally their higher costs as well as the existing infrastructure, which has been developed to facilitate a petroleum‐driven economy. Europe is moving to supplement fossil fuel use with renewables, including biomass and particularly wood, in energy and heating functions in part through direct and indirect subsidies (e.g., Sjolie et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on Food and Feed Prices
    BRIEFING © 2021 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2021 The impact of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on food and feed prices Jane O’Malley, Stephanie Searle Stakeholders have engaged in significant debate around the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and its impact on food and feed prices since its implementation in 2005. Various stakeholders have expressed concerns that the RFS has adverse economic impacts on consumers, livestock farmers, food manufacturers, and restaurants. This briefing paper reviews evidence of the impacts of the RFS on food prices, with a focus on corn and soy, and presents new analysis on the impact of the RFS on U.S. livestock farmers. We summarize the history of debate surrounding the RFS from the perspective of farmers, industry, and policymakers, and analyze its economic impacts relative to a counterfactual, no-RFS scenario. BACKGROUND ON THE RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD AND NATIONAL DEBATE Farmers in the United States consider the RFS to be a boon for their industry, particularly for the crops that are biofuel feedstocks, most notably corn and soybean. Today, nearly 40% of the U.S. national corn crop, or 6.2 billion bushels, is used for ethanol production while approximately 30% of soy oil produced in the United States is used in biodiesel.1 The RFS is generally believed by stakeholders to increase corn prices. www.theicct.org 1 David W. Olson and Thomas Capehart, “Dried Distillers Grains (DDGs) Have Emerged as a Key Ethanol Coproduct,” United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, October 1, 2019, https:// [email protected] www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2019/october/dried-distillers-grains-ddgs-have-emerged-as-a-key-ethanol- coproduct/; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Fire-Impacted Trees for Oriented Strandboards
    Use of fire-impacted trees for oriented strandboards Laura Moya✳ Jerrold E. Winandy✳ William T. Y. Tze✳ Shri Ramaswamy Abstract This study evaluates the potential use of currently unexploited burnt timber from prescribed burns and wildfires for oriented strandboard (OSB). The research was performed in two phases: in Phase I, the effect of thermal exposure of timber on OSB properties was evaluated. Jack pine (Pinus banksiana) trees variously damaged by a moderately intense prescribed burn in a northern Wisconsin forest were selected. Four fire-damage levels of wood were defined and processed into series of single-layer OSB. The flakes used in Phase I had all char removed. Mechanical and physical properties were evaluated in accordance with ASTM D 1037. Results showed that OSB engineering performance of all four fire-damage levels were similar, and their me­ chanical properties met the CSA 0437 requirements. In Phase II, we assessed OSB properties from fire-killed, fire-affected and virgin red pine (Pinus resinosa) trees from a central Wisconsin forest exposed to an intense wildfire. The effect of various thermal exposures and varying amounts of char on OSB performance were evaluated. Phase II findings indicate that fire-damage level and bark amount had significant effects on the board properties. Addition of 20 percent charred bark had an adverse effect on bending strength; however, OSB mechanical properties still met the CSA requirements for all fire levels. Conversely, bark addition up to 20 percent was found to improve dimension stability of boards. This study suggests that burnt timber is a promising alternative bio-feedstock for commercial OSB production.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Biofuels on the Market
    Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Report Delft, July 2013 Author(s): Bettina Kampman (CE Delft) Ruud Verbeek (TNO) Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft) Pim van Mensch (TNO) Harry Croezen (CE Delft) Artur Patuleia (TNO) Publication Data Bibliographical data: Bettina Kampman (CE Delft), Ruud Verbeek (TNO), Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft), Pim van Mensch (TNO), Harry Croezen (CE Delft), Artur Patuleia (TNO) Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Delft, CE Delft, July 2013 Fuels / Renewable / Blends / Increase / Market / Scenarios / Policy / Technical / Measures / Standards FT: Biofuels Publication code: 13.4567.46 CE Delft publications are available from www.cedelft.eu Commissioned by: The European Commission, DG Energy. Further information on this study can be obtained from the contact person, Bettina Kampman. Disclaimer: This study Bringing biofuels on the market. Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits was produced for the European Commission by the consortium of CE Delft and TNO. The views represented in the report are those of its authors and do not represent the views or official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. © copyright, CE Delft, Delft CE Delft Committed to the Environment CE Delft is an independent research and consultancy organisation specialised in developing structural and innovative solutions to environmental problems. CE Delft’s solutions are characterised in being politically feasible, technologically sound, economically prudent and socially equitable.
    [Show full text]