Presentation 2.4: Forest biorefining and implications for future wood energy scenarios
Jack N. Saddler Position: Professor & Dean Organization/Company: University of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract The diversification of the forest products industry to include bioenergy may be characterized by evolution of a number of co products. The biorefinery concept, which considers energy, fuels, and chemical or material production within a single facility or cluster of facilities, may be the route forward for the forest industry that provides optimal revenues and environmental benefits. Forest- based biorefining platforms may use traditional or innovative platforms. A review of biorefineries in other sectors is followed by an examination of potential co products. A number of existing pilot or demonstration facilities exist around the world today, and many of these are described. The growth of biorefining in developed regions creates a technology transfer opportunity that could be facilitated through an FAO-led network similar to IEA Implementing Agreements or Tasks.
149
Forest biorefining and implications for future wood energy scenarios
W.E. Mabee, J.N. Saddler Forest Products Biotechnology, Department of Wood Science Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia 4043-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 [email protected]
International Seminar on Energy and the Forest Products Industry Rome, Italy: October 30 2006
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Outline
1. Defining biorefining in the global context 2. Forest-based biorefining platforms 3. Potential coproducts from the forest-based biorefinery 4. Examples of pilot and demonstration sites 5. Summary & Recommendations
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
151 Definitions
Lignocellulose-based biorefinery: Combination of bioenergy, 2nd-gen biofuel, bioproducts
1st-generation biofuels Commercial, based on food or foodstuff waste
2nd-generation biofuels Non-commercial, based on non-food (including forest biomass) Can be used in conventional infrastructure
3rd-generation biofuels Non-commercial, non-conventional
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Agricultural biorefinery
WET MILLINGCORN DRY MILLING
Cleaning Cleaning Steeping Corn oil Germ Milling Milling
Fibre Washing
Gluten Gluten Sep. Starch Starch Syrup, Sweetner Hydrolysis Hydrolysis Fermentation Fermentation CO2 CO2 Yeast Recycle Yeast Distillation Distillation Ethanol recovery Centrifuge Distillers Wet Grains (DWG) Distillers Dried Syrup Grains (DDG) Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
152 Bioethanol Production
(000,000 litres/a) 40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000 World Bioethanol Production
15,000
10,000 Brazil 5,000 USA & Canada Asia 0 EU 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC Sources: (1) FO Licht. 2005. (2) Fulton, L. 2004. International Energy Agency, Paris.
Outline
1. Defining biorefining in the global context 2. Forest-based biorefining platforms 3. Potential coproducts from the forest-based biorefinery 4. Examples of pilot and demonstration sites 5. Summary & Recommendations
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
153 Biorefining Platforms Fast separation Structured BIOMASS & reconstitution separation
Traditional Biological Thermochemical Platforms Platforms Platforms
BIOENERGY BIOPRODUCTS BIOFUELS
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Pulp and paper ‘refinery’ CHEMI-MECHANICAL SULPHITE PULPING WOOD (BCTMP) PULPING
KRAFT PULPING
Sulphite Liquor Black Liquor Recovery Impregnation Recovery Impregnation Impregnation Cycle Pulping Cycle Pulping Refining Washing Washing Washing Spent Sulphite Pulp Energy Pulp Pulp Liquor 40-55% Yield 48-60% Yield 70-85% Yield
Lignosulphonates
Silvichemicals Bleaching Energy Drying Papermaking
Paper
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
154 Price of Purchased Power
EUR/MWh 80
70
60
50 European average weighted on P&Pb capacity
40
30
20
10
0 USA Chile China Japan Brazil Russia Canada Indonesia
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Paper production growth vs. power
Relative to 1990 figures 1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6 Market pulp, paper, board production
0.4 Primary energy consumption
Electricity consumption 0.2
0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
155 Outline
1. Defining biorefining in the global context 2. Forest-based biorefining platforms 3. Potential coproducts from the forest-based biorefinery 4. Examples of pilot and demonstration sites 5. Summary & Recommendations
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Brazil - Sugar
SUGAR
Pretreatment
Fractionation
Hexoses
Fermentation
Recovery
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC Sources: (1) FAOStat 2006; www.fao.org (2) Bolling, C. and Suarez, N.R. (2001). USDA/ERS – SSS-232.
156 Brazil - Sugar
SUGAR Sugarcane production by product (million metric tonnes) 500 Pretreatment
400 Fractionation
300
Ethanol 200
Hexoses 100 Sugar Fermentation 0 Recovery 1975 1985 1995 2005
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC Sources: (1) FAOStat 2006; www.fao.org (2) Bolling, C. and Suarez, N.R. (2001). USDA/ERS – SSS-232.
United States - Starch
SUGAR STARCH
Pretreatment
Fractionation
Enzymatic Hydrolysis
Hexoses
Fermentation
Recovery
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
157 United States - Starch
SUGAR STARCH
Corn production by product (million metric tonnes) Pretreatment 300
Residual Fractionation 200 Ethanol
Trade Enzymatic Hydrolysis 100 Food, Bioproducts Hexoses
Fermentation Animal Feed 0 Recovery 1980 1990 2000
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Oil refinery Traditional oil refining:
Oil Demand by Sector (million barrels per day) 25 ~68-70% transportation sector Electricity 20 Res'l/Comm'l (i.e. gasoline, diesel)
15 ~21% industrial processing Industrial ~5% ind. plastics, chemicals 10 (over 2,000 refinery products)
5 Transportation ~4% residential/ commercial
0 heating 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 <3% electricity generation
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC Source: (1) EIA. 2005. Annual Energy Review. US oil demand by end-use sector. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/oil_market_basics/Dem_image_US_cons_sector.htm
158 Biological platform
LIGNOCELLULOSE
Pretreatment
Fractionation Lignin Cellulose
Enzymatic Extractives Hydrolysis Hemicellulose
Hexoses Pentoses
Fermentation
Recovery
BIOFUELS BIOENERGY
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC BIOPRODUCTS
Thermochemical biorefinery
BIOMASS
Fast pyrolysis Fast pyrolysis to Bio-oil
Boiler Turbine Upgrade Gasify Reform Fractionation
Synthesis
Methanol, Fischer- Heat Electricity Bio-oil Tropsch, etc. Hydrogen Chemicals
BIOENERGY BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
159 Bioproducts Company
Bulk polymers: BIOLOGICAL NatureWorks, DuPont, Polylactide (PLA), 3-hydroxypropionic acid, 1,3- Cargill propanediol, etc. Nutraceuticals: Codexis, etc. xylitol, arabitol, etc. Platform chemicals: DuPont, etc. Glycerol, furfural, levulinic acid, succinic acid, etc. THERMOCHEMICAL Biofuels: Iogen, Abengoa, etc. ethanol, bio-hydrogen, etc. Biofuels: Choren, etc. bio-oil, methanol, ethanol, Fischer-Tropsch, BTL, etc. Bioenergy: Williams Lake electricity, steam, combined heat & power (cogen), Bioenergy Facility, etc. district heating, wood pellets, etc.
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Outline
1. Defining biorefining in the global context 2. Forest-based biorefining platforms 3. Potential coproducts from the forest-based biorefinery 4. Examples of pilot and demonstration sites 5. Summary & Recommendations
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
160 Iogen Corporation
Bioconversion commercial development facility in Ottawa
$29 million in collaboration with Royal Dutch Shell (2003) $30 million investment by Goldman Sachs (2006)
40 ton/day of straw, grasses and corn stalks
Preparation for $300-400 million full-scale facilities
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Lignol Innovations
Organosolv pulping originally developed by G. E. and Repap ($200 million)
Products include (1) unique, pure lignin with developed markets, (2) furfural, and (3) cellulose-to-ethanol
Benefits of focus: – 3 key products can minimize risk – Resources devoted to primary goals – Further co-products will strengthen business later
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
161 SunOpta Bioprocess Group
Focus on steam-explosion pretreatment, including a continuous digestor
Owns/operates 3 biomass conversion facilities producing dietary fibre
Partnered with Abengoa Bioenergy in developing 2 pilot biomass-to-ethanol facilities (Spain, USA)
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Tembec Chemical Group
Part of Tembec’s sulphite pulp mill on the Ottawa River
Mix of hardwood and softwood feedstocks for pulping
Produces lignosulfonates, resins, and ethanol from spent sulphite liquor
Produces about 17 million litres EtOH annually, sold primarily in the food sector
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
162 Etek Etanolteknik AB (Sweden)
Bioconversion pilot facility in Örnsköldsvik
$15 million investment by four primary shareholders
500 l per 24 hours (equivalent to 2 tonnes input material)
Research and development centre
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Abengoa (Spain, USA)
Castilla y Leon (start 2004) – 200 million litres/a EtOH; – 2.5% lignocellulosic-based – Co-products: Dried Distillers
Grains, CO2 for food
York, Nebraska 2 – Starch pilot plant (2004) – Biomass pilot plant (2005) (corn stover) – $36.1 million ($US) project with DOE
Partnership with SunOpta
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
163 NREL (USA)
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DOE
Bioconversion pilot facility in Golden, CO
1 tonne per day capacity
National centre for R&D activities
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
Outline
1. Defining biorefining in the global context 2. Forest-based biorefining platforms 3. Potential coproducts from the forest-based biorefinery 4. Examples of pilot and demonstration sites 5. Summary & Recommendations
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
164 Conclusions
The biorefinery concept can maximize returns and improve the economic performance of bioenergy technologies
Greatest historical increases in energy demand are for transportation fuels
Most advances have been made in ‘developed’ regions; we need a network to transfer technologies to ‘developing’ partners
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
IEA Bioenergy Task 39 European Commission Kyriakos Maniatis Norway TBC Sweden Guido Zacchi, Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal Finland Tuula Makinen Denmark Birgitte K. Ahring, Lisbeth Olsson Germany Axel Munack Austria Manfred Wörgetter The Netherlands John Neeft, René Wismeijer United Kingdom Tony Sidwell Ireland Bernard Rice Canada Bill Cruickshank United States Larry Russo, Mike Ladisch Japan Shiro Saka (TBC) Australia Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC Steve Schuck (TBC)
165 Acknowledgements
IEA Bioenergy Task 39 Natural Resources Canada BIOCAP Canada Foundation
Don O’Connor, Bill Cruickshank Forest Products Biotechnology Colleagues and collaborators
Questions?
Forest Products Biotechnology at UBC
166