December 8, 2017 NOTICE to BIDDERS Sealed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

December 8, 2017

NOTICE TO BIDDERS

Sealed proposals will be received by the Board of Water and Light (BWL) up to 2:00 P.M., local time,

Tuesday, 01/16/18, for furnishing:
RFP Specification: L-5402a

REFURBISHED COMBUSTION TURBINE GENERATOR (RCTG)

Proposals must be in full accordance with the enclosed Request for Proposal. You are hereby invited to submit a firm fixed Price Proposal (not subject to economic price adjustment) on or before the Bid Due Date listed above, to furnish all design, engineering, labor, supervision, materials, supplies, equipment, and all other services necessary for the REBURBISHED COMBUSTION TURBINE GENERATOR as defined in this request.

Proposals shall be submitted in a non-protected, Adobe format and e-mailed to [email protected]. For ease of identification, enter “RFP Title- Bidder’s Name” in the subject line of your e-mail proposal. You will receive an automatic reply to your submittal which confirms the BWL has received your emailed message. Any

electronic Proposals must be received by due date/time deadline to be accepted. Electronic Proposals received after deadline will be rejected.

ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS SUBMITTED TO OTHER EMAIL ADDRESSES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. DO NOT CARBON-COPY (CC) OTHER BWL, KRAMER MANAGEMENT, OR SARGENT & LUNDY REPRESENTATIVES ON PROPOSALS SUBMITTED TO THE SEALED BIDS INBOX.

Hard copy proposals are required to be submitted by the next business day after the bid due date and in accordance with the following requirements: “ORIGINAL” Proposal, seven (7) copies and two (2) CD’s containing all proposal documents. Do not include copies of the other BWL RFP documents in your proposal package.

Complete the RFP Bid Package Label provided in this RFP and affix it to your bid package. Deliver or mail all hard copy bid packages via one of the methods below by the Close Of Business (COB) on the next business day after the Due Date above:



If submitting by private carrier (UPS, Fedex, DHL, etc…) submit to: Board of Water and Light, Attn: Rachelle Hall, New Gas Combined Cycle Plant, 1110 S. Pennsylvania, Building E, Lansing, Michigan 48912. If submitting in person, deliver to: 1232 Haco Drive, Lansing, Michigan 48912.

The BWL reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, waive irregularities or technicalities in any proposal, and accept any proposal in whole or in part, which in the opinion of the BWL, is in its best interest. The BWL does not limit the methods or factors to be used for evaluation. Neither this Request for Proposal nor any response thereto shall be construed to commit the BWL to pay cost incurred by Bidder or to award a contract.

Questions regarding this RFP will be accepted through Monday, 12/18/2017. Responses to these questions will be issued to all bidders via addenda to this RFP (reference Article 8 in the enclosed Instruction to Bidders). Direct all questions concerning this Request for Proposal, in writing, via email to Rachelle Hall at

[email protected].

Sincerely,

Rachelle Hall New Gas Combined Cycle Plant (517) 702-6192 (517) 702-6042 Fax

[email protected]

This document has important legal consequences; consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its use or modification. This document should be adapted to the particular circumstances of the contemplated Project and the controlling Laws and Regulations.

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR
PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS

Prepared by and
Issued and Published Jointly by

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES
______________________

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS
______________________

ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS
OF AMERICA
______________________

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS IN PRIVATE PRACTICE

A Practice Division of the

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, American Society of Civil Engineers, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2010:
National Society of Professional Engineers
1420 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-2794
(703) 684-2882

www.nspe.org

American Council of Engineering Companies
1015 15th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20005
(202) 347-7474

www.acec.org

American Society of Civil Engineers
1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400
(800) 548-2723

www.asce.org

Associated General Contractors of America
2300 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22201-3308
(703) 548-3118

www.agc.org

The copyright for EJCDC P-200 is owned jointly by the four EJCDC sponsoring organizations listed above. The National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) is the Copyright Administrator for the EJCDC documents; please direct all inquiries and requests regarding EJCDC copyrights to NSPE.

NOTE: EJCDC publications may be purchased at www.ejcdc.org, or from any of the four sponsoring organizations above.

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, American Society of Civil Engineers, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.

Table of Contents

Article 1 - REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS......................................................................... 1 Article 2 - DEFINED TERMS.................................................................................................................... 1 Article 3 - BIDS RECEIVED ..................................................................................................................... 1 Article 4 - COPIES OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS ................................................................................... 1 Article 5 - QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDERS.......................................................................................... 2 Article 6 - BIDDER’S REPRESENTATIONS........................................................................................... 2 Article 7 - PRE-BID MEETING................................................................................................................. 3 Article 8 - INTERPRETATIONS AND ADDENDA ................................................................................ 4 Article 9 - CONTRACT PRICE and TIMES ............................................................................................. 4 Article 10 - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.................................................................................................... 4 Article 11 - SUBSTITUTE AND “OR-EQUAL” ITEMS ......................................................................... 4 Article 12 - PREPARATION OF BID........................................................................................................ 5 Article 13 - BASIS OF BID........................................................................................................................ 6 Article 14 - SUBMITTAL OF BID ............................................................................................................ 6 Article 15 - MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF BID .................................................................. 7 Article 16 - OPENING OF BIDS ............................................................................................................... 7 Article 17 - BIDS TO REMAIN SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE ............................................................. 8 Article 18 - EVALUATION OF BIDS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT ................................................ 8 Article 19 LETTER OF CREDIT AND INSURANCE .......................................................................... 9 Article 20 - SIGNING OF AGREEMENT............................................................................................... 10 Article 21 - SALES AND USE TAXES................................................................................................... 10 Article 22 - AVAILABILITY OF LABOR AND MATERIAL............................................................... 10 Article 23 - VENDOR CYCBERSECURITY QUESTIONNAIRE…………………………………..…10

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers,

American Council of Engineering Companies, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.

Page i

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

ARTICLE 1 - REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS

1.01 The Request for Proposal (“RFP”) consists of the following:

A. Notice to Bidders; B. Instructions to Bidders; C. RFP Document, with attachments;
1. Bid Form, with required attachments; 2. Refurbished CTG Technical Bid Specification L-5402a, Rev 0; 3. Agreement between Purchaser and Seller for Procurement Contracts; 4. Standard General Conditions for Procurement Contracts; 5. Refurbished CTG Proposal Data Form (PD); 6. Refurbished CTG Proposal Pricing Form (PP); 7. Clarifications and Exceptions Form; 8. Vendor Cybersecurity Questionnaire; 9. Sworn and Notarized Affidavit of Compliance - Iran Economic Sanctions Act; 10. LBWL Project Management System (e-Builder); 11. Proposal Questionnaire; 12. Proposal Checklist; 13. RFP Bid Package Label; 14. Addenda, if issued.

ARTICLE 2 - DEFINED TERMS

2.01 Terms used in these Instructions to Bidders will have the meanings indicated in the General
Conditions. Additional terms used in these Instructions to Bidders have the meanings indicated below.

ARTICLE 3 - BIDS RECEIVED

  • 3.01
  • Bidder shall submit bids to the Lansing Board of Water and Light (LBWL) Office

as provided in these Notice to Bidders and Instructions to Bidders.

ARTICLE 4 - COPIES OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS

4.01 Complete sets of the Bidding Documents will be provided electronically from the LBWL website at www.lbwl.com/Bid-Notices/.

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers,
American Council of Engineering Companies, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.
Page 1

4.02 Complete sets of the Bidding Documents shall be used in preparing Bids; neither LBWL nor any LBWL Contractor assumes any responsibility for errors or misinterpretations resulting from the use of incomplete sets of Bidding Documents.

4.03 All complete, in-process or conceptual work supplied by LBWL during the proposal and evaluation process are the sole property of LBWL and may not be used without the consent of LBWL. Any product used, such as, drawings and specifications, photos, campaigns, drafts, etc. are the sole property of LBWL. All LBWL information will be kept confidential at all times. Bidder shall not disclose to others, without the written consent of LBWL, any information concerning the service provided, the organization, its personnel, or its activities, which Bidder may obtain as a result of, or in connection with the performance of the services.

ARTICLE 5 - QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDERS

5.01 To demonstrate Bidder’s qualifications to furnish Goods and Special Services, if requested,

within [five] days of LBWL’s request, Bidder shall submit written evidence, such as financial data, previous experience and current commitments and the following additional information:

5.02 Bidder is advised to carefully review those portions of the Bid Form requiring Bidder’s

representations and certifications.

5.03 A Bidder’s failure to submit required qualification information within the times indicated

may disqualify Bidder from receiving an award of the Contract.

ARTICLE 6 - BIDDER’S REPRESENTATIONS

6.01 Upon request LBWL will provide Bidder access to the Point of Destination and the site where Goods are to be installed or Special Services are to be provided so that Bidder may conduct such investigations, examinations, tests, and studies as Bidder deems necessary for submission of a Bid.

6.02 It is the responsibility of each Bidder before submitting a Bid to:
A. examine and carefully study the Bidding Documents, including any Addenda, and the related data identified in the Bidding Documents;

B. coordinate with LBWL to visit the Point of Destination, and the site where the Goods are to be installed and Special Services are to be provided, during normal business hours, to become familiar with the local conditions if required by the Bidding Documents to do so,

or if, in Bidder’s judgment, any local condition may affect cost, progress, or the furnishing

of Goods and Special Services;
C. become familiar with and satisfy itself as to all Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, or the furnishing of the Goods and Special Services;

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers,
American Council of Engineering Companies, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.
Page 2

D. become aware of the general nature of the work to be performed by LBWL and others at the Point of Destination

E. carefully study, consider, and correlate the information known to Bidder; information commonly known to sellers of similar goods doing business in the locality of the Point of Destination and the site where the Goods will be installed or where Special Services will

be provided; information and observations obtained from Bidder’s visits, if any, to the

Point of Destination and the site where the Goods are to be installed or Special Services are to be provided; and any reports and drawings identified in the Bidding Documents regarding the Point of Destination and the site where the Goods will be installed or where Special Services will be provided, with respect to the effect of such information, observations, and documents on the cost, progress, and performance of Seller's obligations under the Contract Documents;

F. promptly give Point of Contact written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Bidder discovers in the Bidding Documents and confirm that the written resolution (if any) thereof by Point of Contact is acceptable to Bidder;

G. determine that the Bidding Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for furnishing Goods and Special Services; and

H. review LBWL’s safety manual, which can be found on the LBWL’s website at:

http://www.lbwl.com/uploadedFiles/MainSite/Content/Doing_Business/BWL_Safety_

Manual.pdf. All Goods and Special Services shall be in full compliance with the LBWL Safety Manual, and all State of Michigan and national safety requirements.

6.03 The submission of a Bid will constitute an incontrovertible representation by Bidder that
Bidder has complied with every requirement of this Article, that without exception the Bid is premised upon furnishing Goods and Special Services required by the Bidding Documents, that Bidder has given Point of Contact written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities and discrepancies that Bidder has discovered in the Bidding Documents and the written resolutions (if any) thereof by LBWL are acceptable to Bidder, and that the Bidding Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for furnishing Goods and Special Services. Failure by a successful Bidder from complying with this Article shall not relive the Bidder from obligations to provide the Good and Special Services Awarded hereunder, nor shall such failure be a satisfactory reason to increase the Contract Time or Contract Price above that stated in the

Bidder’s proposal.

6.04 All Point of Destination and site visits and work at the Point of Destination may be

governed by the LBWL’s safety program. Unless excepted in the Bidder’s proposal, and accepted by LBWL, Bidder is required to comply with the LBWL’s safety manual during

the furnishing of Goods and Special Services.

ARTICLE 7 - PRE-BID MEETING

7.01 A pre-Bid is not anticipated at this time.

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers,
American Council of Engineering Companies, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.
Page 3

ARTICLE 8 - INTERPRETATIONS AND ADDENDA

8.01 All questions about the meaning or intent of the Bidding Documents are to be submitted to Point of Contact in writing. Interpretations or clarifications considered necessary by LBWL in response to such questions will be issued by Addenda, emailed to all parties recorded as having received the Bidding Documents, as well as posted on the LBWL website. Questions received after the cutoff date for submitting questions will not be answered. Only answers in the Addenda will be binding. Oral statements, interpretations, and clarifications may not be relied upon and will not be binding or legally effective.

8.02 Addenda may be issued to clarify, correct, or change the Bidding Documents as deemed advisable by LBWL or Engineer. Each Bidder shall acknowledge receipt of each Addendum by filling in the blank space provided on the Bid Form and required attachments.

8.03 Bidder shall not submit Bidder’s standard terms and conditions as a replacement to the

General Conditions nor Agreement. Bidder shall submit its proposal based upon the Bid Documents as attached. Bidder may request clarifications and bid exceptions consistent with the terms of the General Conditions. Exceptions to the General Conditions must be

expressly noted on the Bidder’s proposal. Wholesale rejection of the General Conditions, as well as replacing with Bidder’s standard terms and conditions will not receive consideration and result in a rejection in Bidder’s proposal in its entirety. Further, proposals which are submitted and contingent upon Bidder’s standard terms and

conditions will be rejected.

ARTICLE 9 - CONTRACT PRICE AND TIMES

9.01 The contract price shall be equal to the Bid price, adjusted to any price changes as agreed upon in writing by the Bidder and the LBWL in the Agreement. The contract price may be modified via a change order upon mutual agreement of both parties.

9.02 The Contract Times are the number of days within which, or the dates by which the goods are furnished and/or special service are substantially completed, and completed and ready for final payment, are set forth in the Agreement.

ARTICLE 10 - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

10.01 Any provisions for liquidated damages, such as those for Seller’s failure to attain a
Milestone, or to deliver the Goods or furnish Special Services within the Contract Times, are set forth in the Agreement.

ARTICLE 11 - SUBSTITUTE AND “OR-EQUAL” ITEMS

11.01 The Contract, if awarded, will be on the basis of material and equipment specified or

described in the Bidding Documents without consideration of possible substitute or “orequal” items. All prices that Bidder sets forth in its Bid shall be based on the presumption

that the Seller will furnish the materials and equipment specified or described in the Bidding Documents, as supplemented by Addenda.

EJCDC P-200, Instructions to Bidders for Procurement Contracts.
Copyright © 2010 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers,
American Council of Engineering Companies, and Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved.
Page 4

11.02 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Bidding Documents may sometimes specify or

describe that an “or-equal” item of material or equipment may be furnished or used if approved by Engineer and LBWL. If Bidder would like to substitute an “or-equal” item,

Bidder must include in its bid to LBWL two (2) proposals, (a) using the material or equipment specified in the Bidding Documents, and (b) an alternate proposal using the

Recommended publications
  • Towards an Open Collaboration Service Framework Liu, Sandy; Spencer, Bruce; Du, Weichang; Chi, Chihung

    Towards an Open Collaboration Service Framework Liu, Sandy; Spencer, Bruce; Du, Weichang; Chi, Chihung

    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Towards an open collaboration service framework Liu, Sandy; Spencer, Bruce; Du, Weichang; Chi, Chihung This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2011.5928668 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. 77-85, 2011-06-01 NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=d3ac87ef-c3aa-4dd7-be83-af00e5338270 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=d3ac87ef-c3aa-4dd7-be83-af00e5338270 Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
  • Understanding Stakeholders' Objectives in Software Product Line

    Understanding Stakeholders' Objectives in Software Product Line

    From Intentions to Decisions: Understanding Stakeholders’ Objectives in Software Product Line Configuration Mahdi Noorian1, Ebrahim Bagheri2, Weichang Du1 University of New Brunswick, Fredericton,Canada1 Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada2 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Software Product Line (SPL) engineering promotes undesirable ones from the perspective of stakeholders [4]. the systematic and large-scale reuse of design and implementation The software product line research community has developed artifacts. Feature models are one of the main artefact of SPLE effective methods for configuring product line models such approach which essentially characterize the similar and variant functional and operational specifications of the product family. as feature models. The basic assumption of these methods and Given the complexity of the variabilities represented by feature tools is that the set of initial desirable features is already known models, it is often hard for the stakeholders to analyze a feature to the stakeholders or at least to the software product designers model and identify the features that are most important for their [5]. However in reality regardless of the configuration process purpose. So, given large-scale software product families, one of itself, the selection of the initial set of desirable features is the important questions is how and what features should be selected for the target software product from the product family. both important and very difficult to do for the stakeholders and To address this problem, we adopt concepts from the domain of product designers. The selection of these features depends on goal-oriented requirement engineering and base feature selection the restrictions placed by and objectives of the stakeholders and decisions on software stakeholders’ intentions and expectations.
  • The US Government's Open System Environment Profile OSE/1 Version

    The US Government's Open System Environment Profile OSE/1 Version

    C NIST Special Publication 500-21 Computer Systems APPLICATION PORTABILITY PROFILE Technology (APP) The U.S. Government's U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration Open System Environment Profile National Institute of Standards and Technology OSE/1 Version 2.0 Nisr NAT L !NST."OF STAND i TECH R.I.C. llllllllllllllllllll NIST PUBLICATIONS AlllDM QEETfll APPLICA TION PORTABILITYPROFILE j)JT)) The U S. Government's ^ k^Open System Environment IL Profile OSE/1 Version 2.0 -QG 100 .U57 #500-210 1993 7he National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering and performs related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303.
  • User-Centered Design: Why and How to Put Users First in Software Development

    User-Centered Design: Why and How to Put Users First in Software Development

    User-Centered Design: Why and How to Put Users First in Software Development Dieter Wallach and Sebastian C. Scholz Abstract In this chapter we provide an overview of the activities and artefacts of the user- centered design (UCD) methodology – a successful and practical approach to the design of software user interfaces. After tracing its foundational principles (early focus on users, empirical measurement using prototypes and iterative design) back to 1985s seminal paper by Gould and Lewis, we will highlight each of five central categories of design activities (Scope, Analyse, Design, Validate and Deliver) performed in UCD. Potential integration of UCD into two popular categorizations of software development (User Interface First vs. User Interface Later) will be explored and then demonstrated in a real life case study from the field of electronic engineering along with a practical takeaway regarding the relationship of UCD and eLearning. 1 Introduction On January 9th, 2007 Apple announced three things: a widescreen iPod with touch control, a revolutionary mobile phone and a breakthrough internet communication device – all combined in a single device named iPhone. Six months, worldwide distributed photos showing long lines of staying the night customers willing to wait and buy, and massive international iPhone press coverage later, Apple’s stock value had already climbed by 60 % when the iPhone finally became available on the market (and ascended by more than 600 % since then). It was not for providing new D. Wallach University of Applied Sciences, Kaiserslautern, Germany e-mail: [email protected] S.C. Scholz ERGOSIGN GmbH, Munich, Germany e-mail: [email protected] A.
  • IEEE Std 1016-2009, IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Systems Design— Software Design Descriptions

    IEEE Std 1016-2009, IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Systems Design— Software Design Descriptions

    IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Systems Design— Software Design Descriptions IEEE Computer Society Sponsored by the Software & Systems Engineering Standards Committee TM IEEE 1016 3 Park Avenue IEEE Std 1016™-2009 New York, NY 10016-5997, USA (Revision of IEEE Std 1016-1998) 20 July 2009 Authorized licensed use limited to: University of New Brunswick. Downloaded on February 24,2010 at 13:30:17 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. Authorized licensed use limited to: University of New Brunswick. Downloaded on February 24,2010 at 13:30:17 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. IEEE Std 1016™-2009 (Revision of IEEE Std 1016-1998) IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Systems Design— Software Design Descriptions Sponsor Software & Systems Engineering Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society Approved 19 March 2009 IEEE-SA Standards Board Authorized licensed use limited to: University of New Brunswick. Downloaded on February 24,2010 at 13:30:17 EST from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. Abstract: The required information content and organization for software design descriptions (SDDs) are described. An SDD is a representation of a software design to be used for communicating design information to its stakeholders. The requirements for the design languages (notations and other representational schemes) to be used for conformant SDDs are specified. This standard is applicable to automated databases and design description languages but can be used for paper documents and other means of descriptions. Keywords: design concern, design subject, design view, design viewpoint, diagram, software design, software design description • The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997, USA Copyright © 2009 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
  • HIGHLANDS NEWS-SUN Thursday, December 26, 2019

    HIGHLANDS NEWS-SUN Thursday, December 26, 2019 VOL. 100 | NO. 360 | $1.00 YOUR HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER SINCE 1919 An Edition Of The Sun Fines from texting while driving starts Wednesday By KIM LEATHERMAN Florida Ban on Texting the law to the letter. first offense is considered STAFF WRITER While Driving Law “People have had plen- a non-moving violation was signed into law by ty of time,” Sebring Police that carries a $116 fine SEBRING — Don’t Governor Ron DeSantis Department’s Sgt. Mike with no points. The even think about texting and it took effect July 1. Cutolo said. “They’re second offense within if you’re driving. Driving Law enforcement officers aware they shouldn’t be five years is considered a and texting is always can pull over a driver who texting and driving. They moving violation; the fine dangerous, some even is texting as a primary know they are swerving. is $166. Court fees could pay with their lives. offense. Previously, LEO There have been signs put accrue if the citation is Lawmakers decided had to perform a traffic up and it’s been on the contested and the judge hitting people in their stop for another reason. FILE PHOTO news and social media.” upholds the citation. wallets might curb the October to Jan. 1 was Cutolo said it is “This law improves distracting habit. As of considered a time for Motorists caught on the cell phone in a school or construction ultimately the LEO’s driver safety,” Cutolo said. Jan. 1, fines and possibly educating motorists on zone can be pulled over as a main offense.
  • List of Programmers 1 List of Programmers

    List of Programmers 1 List of Programmers

    List of programmers 1 List of programmers This list is incomplete. This is a list of programmers notable for their contributions to software, either as original author or architect, or for later additions. A • Michael Abrash - Popularized Mode X for DOS. This allows for faster video refresh and square pixels. • Scott Adams - one of earliest developers of CP/M and DOS games • Leonard Adleman - co-creator of RSA algorithm (the A in the name stands for Adleman), coined the term computer virus • Alfred Aho - co-creator of AWK (the A in the name stands for Aho), and main author of famous Dragon book • JJ Allaire - creator of ColdFusion Application Server, ColdFusion Markup Language • Paul Allen - Altair BASIC, Applesoft BASIC, co-founded Microsoft • Eric Allman - sendmail, syslog • Marc Andreessen - co-creator of Mosaic, co-founder of Netscape • Bill Atkinson - QuickDraw, HyperCard B • John Backus - FORTRAN, BNF • Richard Bartle - MUD, with Roy Trubshaw, creator of MUDs • Brian Behlendorf - Apache • Kent Beck - Created Extreme Programming and co-creator of JUnit • Donald Becker - Linux Ethernet drivers, Beowulf clustering • Doug Bell - Dungeon Master series of computer games • Fabrice Bellard - Creator of FFMPEG open codec library, QEMU virtualization tools • Tim Berners-Lee - inventor of World Wide Web • Daniel J. Bernstein - djbdns, qmail • Eric Bina - co-creator of Mosaic web browser • Marc Blank - co-creator of Zork • Joshua Bloch - core Java language designer, lead the Java collections framework project • Bert Bos - author of Argo web browser, co-author of Cascading Style Sheets • David Bradley - coder on the IBM PC project team who wrote the Control-Alt-Delete keyboard handler, embedded in all PC-compatible BIOSes • Andrew Braybrook - video games Paradroid and Uridium • Larry Breed - co-developer of APL\360 • Jack E.
  • Machine Learning-Based Software Testing: Towards a Classification

    Machine Learning-Based Software Testing: Towards a Classification

    Machine Learning-based Software Testing: Towards a Classification Framework Mahdi Noorian1, Ebrahim Bagheri1,2, and Wheichang Du1 University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada1 Athabasca University, Edmonton, Canada2 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Software Testing (ST) processes attempt to verify as: What types of machine learning methods can be effective and validate the capability of a software system to meet its • required attributes and functionality. As software systems become in different aspects of software testing? more complex, the need for automated software testing methods What are the strengths and weaknesses of each learning • emerges. Machine Learning (ML) techniques have shown to be method in the context of testing? quite useful for this automation process. Various works have How can we determine the proper type of learning method been presented in the junction of ML and ST areas. The lack of • general guidelines for applying appropriate learning methods for for the stages of a testing process? Where are the critical points in a software testing process software testing purposes is our major motivation in this current • paper. In this paper, we introduce a classification framework in which ML can positively contribute? which can help to systematically review research work in the The general purpose of our ongoing research is to provide ML and ST domains. The proposed framework dimensions are defined using major characteristics of existing software testing a specific set of guidelines for automating software testing and machine learning methods. Our framework can be used to processes with the aid of machine leaning techniques. To come effectively construct a concrete set of guidelines for choosing the up with such set of guidelines, it is required to systematically most appropriate learning method and applying it to a distinct analyse the current research work and find answers to some of stage of the software testing life-cycle for automation purposes.
  • Software Directory

    Software Directory

    he Quality Sourc eb o o k ’s Softwa re document revision while keeping old revi- ISO 9000 Software Matrix ..................141 Guide feat u r es inform a tion on com- sions on fil e. Such a system also needs to Pe r h aps nowh e re does softwa re seem T panies that provide quality softwar e allow users to create new revisions, route m o re of a boon than when it can be used for ISO 9000, document contro l , c a l i b ra- them for approval and inform other users s u c c e s s f u l ly to orga n i ze a complicat e d, tion and fl ow ch a rt i n g. Because there is when a new revision supersedes an ex i s t- h e av i ly detail-ori e n t e d, d o c u m e n t at i o n - s u ch a wide va riety of SPC softwa re ava i l- ing document. intensive process such as ISO 9000 regis- abl e, we have given SPC softwa re its ow n The Document Control Softwar e Direc - tr ation. Fort u n at e l y, so f t wa r e manufa c t u re r s section in this Quality Sourc ebook. Fo r to r y lists companies that specialize in docu- ha ve developed a wide assortment of pack- m o re info rm ation on any of the pro d u c t s ment control softwa re and provides some ages to meet most eve ry ISO 9000 need.
  • Input Validation Testing: a System Level, Early Lifecycle Technique

    Input Validation Testing: a System Level, Early Lifecycle Technique

    INPUT VALIDATION TESTING: A SYSTEM LEVEL, EARLY LIFECYCLE TECHNIQUE by Jane Huffman Hayes A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Information Technology Committee: A. Jefferson Offutt, Dissertation Director David Rine, Chairman Paul Ammann Elizabeth White Lance Miller, VP and Director, SAIC Stephen Nash, Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Research Lloyd Griffiths, Dean, School of Information Technology and Engineering Date: Fall 1998 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia INPUT VALIDATION TESTING: A SYSTEM LEVEL, EARLY LIFECYCLE TECHNIQUE A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor Of Philosophy degree in Information Technology at George Mason University By Jane Huffman Hayes Master of Science University of Southern Mississippi, 1987 Director: A. Jefferson Offutt, Associate Professor Department of Information and Software Engineering Fall Semester 1998 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia ii Copyright 1998 Jane Huffman Hayes All Rights Reserved iii Dedication This dissertation is lovingly dedicated to: My Grandmother, Margaret Ruth Nicholson Huffman, for teaching me to stand up for what I believe in My Grandfather, John Hubert Gunter, for teaching me that amazing things can be accomplished before breakfast My Great Grandmother, Jane Ellen Nicholson, for teaching me it’s the thought that counts My Grandmother, Beatrice Gertrude Gunter, for teaching me that love is the
  • Cost-Effective Communication and Control Architectures for Active Low Voltage Grids

    Cost-Effective Communication and Control Architectures for Active Low Voltage Grids

    Cost-effective Communication and Control Architectures for Active Low Voltage Grids MIKEL ARMENDÁRIZ Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2017 i TRITA-EE 2017:160 Electric Power and Energy Systems ISSN 1653-5146 KTH, Royal Institute of Technology ISBN 978-91-7729-588-4 Stockholm, Sweden Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Mikel Armendáriz, November 2017. Copyrighted articles are reprinted with kind permission from IET, IEEE and Elsevier. Printed by Universitetsservice US AB ii Abstract: The monitoring and control of low voltage distribution grids has historically been disregarded due to the unidirectional flow of power. However, nowadays the electric power system is being modernized to enable a sustainable energy system. This is assisted by the smart grids concept, which incorporates the new types of loads, the active energy consumers, often called 'prosumers', and the higher requirements for reliability and quality of service. The number of prosumers is increasing since many houses, apartments, commercial building and public institutions are beginning to produce energy, mainly through solar photovoltaic panels on their rooftop. These installations are principally promoted by the fall in the cost of renewable energy technologies, especially solar panels. Thus, while the small-scale renewables can reduce the electricity bill for the consumers, they can also generate problems for the distribution grid operators because the non- consumed energy surplus is exported to the grid and that requires updating the existing electricity infrastructures. This new paradigm adds new regulatory, economic, and technical type of challenges. In response to this new situation, this thesis investigates the communication and control architectures that are required for active low voltage grid monitoring and control applications, considering the regulatory constraints and the efficient utilization of the assets from a distribution system operator’s perspective.
  • BAYERN Premium Domains

    BAYERN Premium Domains

    .BAYERN Premium Domains aerzte.bayern airport.bayern airports.bayern alpen.bayern altenpflege.bayern altenpfleger.bayern ammersee.bayern anwaelte.bayern anwalt.bayern arbeitsmarkt.bayern architekt.bayern architekten.bayern architektur.bayern arzt.bayern augenaerzte.bayern augenarzt.bayern baecker.bayern bank.bayern banken.bayern bayerischer-wald.bayern bayrischerwald.bayern bayrischer-wald.bayern beer.bayern bestattung.bayern bestattungen.bayern bier.bayern biere.bayern biergaerten.bayern biergarten.bayern bio.bayern bodensee.bayern breze.bayern brezen.bayern brezn.bayern chiemgau.bayern design.bayern dirndl.bayern fichtelgebirge.bayern flughafen.bayern food.bayern franken.bayern frankenwald.bayern frauenarzt.bayern friseure.bayern fussball.bayern golf.bayern hilfe.bayern hotel.bayern hotels.bayern jobs.bayern jobsuche.bayern kinder.bayern kitas.bayern krankenpflege.bayern lederhose.bayern lederhosen.bayern lehrer.bayern metzger.bayern nieder.bayern notar.bayern notarzt.bayern notfall.bayern nymphenburg.bayern ober.bayern oeko.bayern oktoberfest.bayern rechtsanwaelte.bayern rettung.bayern rothsee.bayern shop.bayern ski.bayern sport.bayern steigerwald.bayern steuerberater.bayern steuerberatung.bayern taxi.bayern taxis.bayern tennis.bayern tracht.bayern trachten.bayern versicherung.bayern versicherungen.bayern wein.bayern weissbier.bayern wetter.bayern xn--anwlte-dua.bayern xn--augenrzte-z2a.bayern xn--bcker-gra.bayern xn--biergrten-z2a.bayern xn--flughfen-4za.bayern xn--frisre-zxa.bayern xn--frisr-mua.bayern xn--fuball-cta.bayern xn--ko-eka.bayern