DOCSLIB.ORG

Plotinus' Epistemology and His Reading of the Theaetetus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plotinus' Epistemology and His Reading of the Theaetetus Plotinus' epistemology and his reading of the Theaetetus Sara Magrin Department of Philosophy McGill University, Montreal July 2009 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Copyright Sara Magrin 2009 Abstract: Plotinus' epistemology and his reading of the Theaetetus The thesis offers a reconstruction of Plotinus’ reading of the Theaetetus, and it presents an account of his epistemology that rests on that reading. It aims to show that Plotinus reads the Theaetetus as containing two anti-sceptical arguments. The first argument is an answer to radical scepticism, namely, to the thesis that nothing is apprehensible and judgement must be suspended on all matters. The second argument is an answer to a more moderate form of scepticism, which does not endorse a universal suspension of judgement, but maintains nonetheless that scientific knowledge is unattainable. The first chapter opens with a reconstruction of Plotinus’ reading of Theaet., 151e-184a, where Socrates examines the thesis that knowledge is sensation in light of Protagoras’ epistemology. In this chapter it is argued that Plotinus makes a polemical use of the discussion of Protagoras’ epistemology. Plotinus takes Plato to show that Protagoras’ views imply radical scepticism; and he attack the Stoics’ epistemological and ontological commitments by arguing that they imply Protagoras’ views, and thus lead to radical scepticism, too. The second chapter examines Plotinus’ interpretation of the ontology of the Timaeus. In Theaet., 151e-184a Plato shows that Protagoras’ epistemology leads to radical scepticism by arguing that it implies an allegedly Heracleitean conception of the sensible world. Plotinus maintains that in the Timaeus Plato offers an alternative to Protagoras’ and Heracleitus’ ontology. This alternative conception of the sensible world provides some of the premises on which Plotinus builds his interpretation of Theaet., Part I, 184b- 187a. The third chapter reconstructs Plotinus’ reading of Theaet., 184b-187a. In this chapter it is argued that Plotinus takes the discussion of sensation at Theaet., 184b-186b 11 to remove the threat to knowledge that is presented by radical scepticism, while he reads Theaet., 186b 11-187a as presenting an argument against the more moderate forms of scepticism described above. The third chapter also offers an overview of Plotinus’ reading of the Theaetetus in its entirety and it suggests that this dialogue for Plotinus represents a Platonic exercise in Socratic dialectic that aims to prepare the student for the dialectic of the Sophist. Résumé : L’épistémologie de Plotin et son interpretation du Thééthète Cette thèse reconstruit la lecture plotinienne du Thééthète, et elle présente une analyse de l’épistémologie de Plotin qui s’appui sur cette lecture. Le but de ce travail et de montrer que Plotin identifie dans le Thééthète deux arguments contre le scepticisme. Le premier argument est une réponse à une forme de scepticisme radicale, c’est-à-dire à la thèse selon laquelle rien n’est connaissable et le jugement doit être suspendu sur toute chose. Le second argument est une réponse à une forme plus modérée de scepticisme, qui n’appui pas une suspension du jugement universelle, mais maintient quand même qu’on ne peut pas atteindre la connaissance. Le premier chapitre reconstruit la lecture plotinienne de Theaet., 151e-184a, où Socrate analyse la thèse que la connaissance est sensation à la lumière de l’épistémologie de Protagoras. Dans ce chapitre on observe que Plotin emploie à des fins polémiques la discussion de l’épistémologie de Protagoras. Plotin pense que pour Platon l’épistémologie de Protagoras implique un scepticisme radical, et il attaque l’épistémologie et l’ontologie des stoïciens en essayant de démontrer qu’elles impliquent la position de Protagoras, si bien qu’elles aussi amènent à une forme de scepticisme radical. Le deuxième chapitre analyse la lecture plotinienne de l’ontologie du Timée. Dans Theaet., 151e-184a, Platon montre que l’épistémologie de Protagoras amène au scepticisme radical en soutenant qu’elle implique une conception du monde sensible de type héraclitéen. Plotin soutient que dans le Timée Platon présente une alternative à l’ontologie de Protagoras et d’Héraclite. Cette nouvelle conception du monde sensible fournit des prémisses sur lesquelles Plotin construit son interprétation de Theaet., 184b-187a. Le troisième chapitre reconstruit la lecture plotinienne de Theaet., 184b-187a. Dans ce chapitre on suggère que Plotin voit dans Theaet., 184b-186b un argument qui vise à éliminer la menace d’un scepticisme radical, et qu’il voit dans Theaet., 186b 11-187a un argument qui vise à réfuter une forme de scepticisme plus modérée, telle que celle décrite en haute. Le troisième chapitre présente aussi une vision d’ensemble de la lecture que Plotin fait du dialogue et il suggère que ce dialogue pour Plotin représente un exercice de dialectique socratique qui prépare le lecteur à la lecture du Sophiste. Per Rosa, Brian e Caterina ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first debt of gratitude goes to my supervisor Prof. Stephen Menn, for the care and kindness with which he has directed my work in the past years. Every page of this thesis has benefitted from his suggestions, and from his unfailing attempts to steer me away from error. I want to thank my co-supervisor Prof. Richard Bodéüs for his comments and his generous encouragement. Special thanks go to Cristina D’Ancona, Eyólfur Emilsson, Paul Kalligas, Claude Panaccio, Steven Strange, and Brian van den Broek for their invaluable help with different parts of the dissertation. Marwan Rashed and Philippe Hoffmann helped me greatly during a yearlong staying in Paris where I had access to the the wonderful library of the École Normale Supérieure. May they be warmly thanked here. I am grateful to the faculty of the department of philosophy of McGill University for having accepted me in their Ph.D. program, and as a recipient of the Tomlinson doctoral fellowship I want to thank Doctor Richard Tomlinson and the faculty of graduate studies for their financial support over the years. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Plotinus on Theaetetus Part I (151e-184a) 18 1.1. Readings of Theaet., 151e-184a 18 1.2. Plotinus and the Stoics on the real being of bodies 24 1.3. The Stoics’ ontology and their theory of categories 26 1.4. III.6.[26]: Plotinus’ criticism of the Stoics’ first two 34 categories 1.5. Conflicting appearances vs. cataleptic representations 48 1.6. VI.6.[34]: Plotinus’ criticism of the Stoics’ third category 59 1.7. The Stoics and the Theaetetus 66 1.8. The Stoics and the refutation of Protagoras 82 1.9. The antecedents of Plotinus’ anti-Stoic strategy 86 Chapter 2: From Protagoras to Plato: the ontology of the Timaeus 91 2.1. Are sensible qualities illusions? 91 2.2. Abandoning atomism 102 2.3. The intelligible structure of bodies: II.6.[17] 115 2.4. Lo/goi as natures 133 2.5. Plotinus’ account of necessity in the sensible world 144 2.6. Lo/goi and “forms in us” 148 2.7. Sensible qualities are indestructible: the Stoics and Aristotle 152 2.8. The inexhaustibility of generation: Aristotle 160 2.9. The inexhaustibility of generation: Plotinus 162 2.10. The identity of bodies through time 167 2.11. The issue of a)ntitupi/a 175 2.12. Matter 180 Chapter 3: Plotinus on Theaetetus Part I (184b-187a) 188 3.1. Plotinus and the reductio ad Protagoram 188 3.2. Readings of Theaetetus Part I: 184b-187a 192 3.3. The Wooden Horse psychology and Plotinus’ conception of 197 the soul 3.4. Sensation is a judgement of the soul 207 3.5. Sensation is a judgement of the soul: Aristotle 222 3.6. The Cyrenaics and Protagoras 229 3.7. Theaet., 184b-d: the Wooden Horse psychology and the 232 removal of akatalēpsia 3.8. Theaet., 184d-186c 5: sensation as a judgement of the soul 241 3.9. Theaet., 186c 6-187a 8: sensory representations and beliefs 250 3.10. A summary of Plotinus’ reading of Theaet., 184b-187a 256 3.11. The direct realist reading of sensory judgement 259 3.12. Criteria of truth 270 3.13. Plotinus’ reading of Theaetetus Part II 275 3.14. Plotinus and the anonymous commentator on the Theaetetus 284 Conclusion 286 Bibliography 290 Introduction In book III of the Contra Academicos, Augustine presents a short account of the history of the Academy.1 Plato, he says, built a complete system of philosophy, and he maintained that there are two worlds: the intelligible world, in which truth and knowledge can be found, and the sensible world—an image of the true world—, where there is only truth-like opinion. But, not long after Plato’s death, the Academy underwent a considerable change. Zeno, who was to be the founder of Stoicism, began to attend the school, and he started spreading inside and outside the Academy some un-Platonic views. He maintained that only the sensible world existed, and that the soul and God were bodies. Alarmed by these views, Plato’s successors began to preserve the doctrine of the master as a “mystery” to be guarded from those men whose “impure” minds were not prepared to receive it. The first to adopt this policy was Arcesilaus, a fellow student of Zeno, who became the head of the so- called New or Second Academy. Arcesilaus thought that there was no point in trying to teach Plato to people whose minds were cluttered by mistaken beliefs, and he made it his priority to free from error those who had been wrongly taught. Afraid that Plato’s teachings could have been distorted, he buried them, as “a golden treasure” to be uncovered by future generations, and he assumed a sceptical attitude, professing two things: that nothing could be apprehended, and that judgement had to be suspended on all matters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Augustine on Knowledge
    Augustine on Knowledge Divine Illumination as an Argument Against Scepticism ANITA VAN DER BOS RMA: RELIGION & CULTURE Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Research Master Thesis s2217473, April 2017 FIRST SUPERVISOR: dr. M. Van Dijk SECOND SUPERVISOR: dr. dr. F.L. Roig Lanzillotta 1 2 Content Augustine on Knowledge ........................................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 4 Preface .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7 The life of Saint Augustine ................................................................................................................... 9 The influence of the Contra Academicos .......................................................................................... 13 Note on the quotations ........................................................................................................................ 14 1. Scepticism ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Guide to Philo Other Books by Kenneth Schenck from Westminster John Knox Press
    A Brief Guide to Philo Other books by Kenneth Schenck from Westminster John Knox Press Understanding the Book of Hebrews A BRIEF GUIDE TO PHILO Kenneth Schenck WESTMINSTER |C»iNKNOXmESS W[K UMTeVfiJLE • KENTUCKY © 2005 Kenneth Schenck AU rights reserved. No ^art of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic Or mechanical, including photocopyii^ recording, or by any infor• mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Westminster John Knox Press, 100 Witherspoon Street, Louisville, Kentucl^r 40202-1396. Unless otherwise indicated, all translations are die authors. Scripture quotations marked NRSV are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Divi• sion of Christian Education of the National G)uncil of the Churches of Christ in die U.S A, and are used by permission. Scripture quotations marked RSV are fix)m the Revised Standard Version of die Bible, copyright © 1946,1952,1971, and 1973 by die Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S A, and are used by permission. Book design by Sharon Adams Cover design by Mark Abrams First edition Pubhshed by Westminster John Knox Press Louisville, Kentucky This book is printed on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Instimte Z39.48 standard. © PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 — 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Catalogiiig-in-Publication Data Schenck, Kenneth A brief guide to Philo / Kenneth Schenck— 1st ed.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Arcesilaus and Carneades
    C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP/552750/WORKINGFOLDER/BCP/9780521874762C03.3D 58 [58–80] 24.9.2009 7:15AM harald thorsrud 3 Arcesilaus and Carneades Arcesilaus initiated a sceptical phase in the Academy after taking over in c. 268 BCE. He was motivated in part by an innovative reading of Plato’s dialogues. Where his predecessors found positive doctrines to be systematically developed, he found a dialectical method of arguing and the sceptical view that nothing can be known (akatalêpsia, De Or. 3.67,seeDL4.28, 4.32). He also advanced this conclusion in opposition to the ambitious system of the Stoics, claiming further that the appropriate response to the pervasive uncertainty generated by his method is the suspension of judgement (epochê). Arcesilaus’ dialectical method was practiced without significant modification in the Academy until Carneades, who became head sometime before 155 BCE.1 Carneades both continued and strength- ened Arcesilaus’ method (ND 1.11, Acad. 2.16, see also Acad. 1.46, and Eusebius, Praep. evang. 14.7.15). Sextus marks the change by referring to Plato’s Academy as Old, Arcesilaus’ as Middle, and Carneades’ as New (PH 1.220). Since the main interpretative issues regarding both Arcesilaus and Carneades depend on the concepts of akatalêpsia and epochê,we must try to determine what they mean, how they are related, and what attitude the Academics take towards them – i.e. in what sense, if any, are these their sceptical doctrines? iarcesilaus The view that Arcesilaus derived from Plato’s dialogues might have taken one of two very different forms. He might have discovered some arguments that show knowledge is not possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conversion of Skepticism in Augustine's Against the Academics the Conversion of Skepticism in Augustine"S Against the Academics
    THE CONVERSION OF SKEPTICISM IN AUGUSTINE'S AGAINST THE ACADEMICS THE CONVERSION OF SKEPTICISM IN AUGUSTINE"S AGAINST THE ACADEMICS BY BERNARD NEWMAN WILLS, B.A., M.A. A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor ofPhilosophy McMaster University C Copyright by Bernard Newman Wills DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2003) McMaster University (Religious Studies) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Conversion of Skepticism in Augustine's Against the Academics AUTHOR: Bernard Newman Wills, B.A., M.A. SUPERVISOR: Dr. P. Travis Kroeker NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 322 ABSTRACT This thesis examines Augustine's relation to Academic Skepticism through a detailed commentary on the dialogue Against the Academics. In it is demonstrated the significance of epistemological themes for Augustine and their inseparability from practical and religious concerns. It is also shown how these issues unfold within the logic ofAugustine's trinitarianism, which informs the argument even ofhis earliest works. This, in turn, demonstrates the depth of the young Augustine's engagement with Christian categories in works often thought to be determined wholly, or almost wholly, by the logic of Plotinian Neo-Platonism. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Travis Kroeker for his advice and considerable patience: my readers Dr. Peter Widdicome and Dr. Zdravko Planinc: Dr. David Peddle for several useful suggestions and general encouragement: Dr. Dennis House for teaching me the art of reading dialogues: Mr. Danny Howlett for his editorial assistance: Grad Students and Colleagues at Memorial University of Newfoundland and, in a category all their own, my longsuffering wife Jean and three boisterous children Kristin, Jeremy and Thomas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Comp. by: C. Vijayakumar Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 0002195881 Date:30/10/ 14 Time:14:12:02 Filepath://ppdys1122/BgPr/OUP_CAP/IN/Process/ 0002195881.3d243 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, 30/10/2014, SPi Bibliography Accattino, P. (1985). Alessandro di Afrodisia e Aristotele di Mitelene. Elenchos 6, 67–74. Ackrill, J. L. (1962). Critical Notice: Die Aristotelische Syllogistik. By Gün- ther Patzig. Mind, 71, 107–17. Ackrill, J. L. (1963). Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ackrill, J. L. (1997). Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Adamson, P. (2005). On Knowledge of Particulars. Proceedings of the Aris- totelian Society, 105, 257–78. Adamson, P. (2007a). Knowledge of Universals and Particulars in the Bagh- dad School. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 18, 141–64. Adamson, P. (2007b). Al-Kindī. New York: Oxford University Press. Adamson, P., Baltussen, H., and Stone, M. W. F. (eds). (2004). Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Commentaries. London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London. Adamson, P., and Taylor, R. C. (eds). (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. T. (eds). (1996). Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden: Brill. Allen, J. (2005). The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology. In D. Frede and B. Inwood (eds), Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, pp. 14–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Allen, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Fattal, Du Logos De Plotin Au Logos De Saint Jean
    MICHEL FATTAL, DU LOGOS DE PLOTIN AU LOGOS DE SAINT JEAN. VERS LA SOLUTION D’un PROBLÈME MÉTAPHYSIQUE? PARIS, LES ÉDITIONS DU CERF, 2016, 150 PP., ISBN 9782204109673. Reviewed by Pedro Paulo A. Funari University of Campinas – Unicamp Michel Fattal is a well-known philosopher, a specialist on logos from the Pre-Socratics to the mediaeval period, passing through Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics and beyond. He puts together classical philosophy and Christian epistemology in innovative ways, as is the case in his new volume on Logos in Plotinus and in Saint John. The book gathers a series of lectures, starting with a keynote speech, or lectio magistralis, at Rome in April 2011, followed by several others. Fattal lectured on a related topic in Brasília, 2016, at a Archai Unesco Chair meeting. Fattal started to explore Logos in ancient Greek taught as early as 1977 and continued doing so in his PhD dissertation (1980) and Pedro Paulo A. Funari Habilitation (2001), publishing overall 19 books and dozens of papers and chapters. This volume is the 17th in a series on the Logos, and it deals with the relational logos in both Plotinus and Saint John, particularly the relationship of the sensible and possible to understand, earth and heaven, humans and God. Logos as a philosophical concept implies putting together (function rassemblante et unifiante). Legein derives from the root *leg-, meaning putting together and choosing. Logos thus means relating, and so speaking, a discourse as composition (sunthesis). Parmenides considers the Logos as the critical reason, capable of splitting up being and non-being, what is true and what is false, krinai logo, to judge or split up by reason (Parmenides B7, 5D-K).
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Volume 31, Winter 2006
    LIVING IN DOUBT: CARNEADES’ PITHANON RECONSIDERED SUZANNE OBDRZALEK I though the interpretation of ancient texts is inevitably di¶cult, Carneades presents what one might call a worst-case scenario. In the first place, he wrote nothing. To complicate matters, Carneades’ views were so obscure that his faithful disciple Clitomachus con- fessed that he could never figure out what Carneades actually be- lieved (Cic. Acad. 2. 139). Showing remarkable fortitude in the face of such an obstacle, Clitomachus, attempting to play Plato to Carneades’ Socrates, reportedly recorded Carneades’ teachings in 400 books (D.L. 4. 67). Not one remains. None the less, Clito- machus’ attempt to make a philosophy of Carneades’ anti-theoreti- cal stance was not a complete failure; Carneades had a tremendous influence on the later Academy as well as the Stoa, and his views (or lack thereof) have been handed down to us by both Sextus Em- piricus and Cicero. These sources are, however, problematic. As a Pyrrhonist, Sextus was critical of the Academy and may have ex- aggerated what he took to be Carneades’ dogmatism. Cicero, on the other hand, a student of Philo, was undoubtedly influenced in his interpretation of Carneades by his teacher’s dogmatic scepti- cism. Carneades is perhaps best known for proposing the pithan»e phantasia (probable impression) as a criterion for life. However, the status of his theory of the pithanon (probable) is completely unclear.1 Was it merely a dialectical move against the Stoic charge of apraxia (inaction)? Was it a theory that Carneades himself en- ã Suzanne Obdrzalek 2006 I would like to thank Alan Code, Tony Long, Julius Moravcsik, and David Sedley for their comments on this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48147-2 — Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture Reviel Netz Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48147-2 — Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture Reviel Netz Index More Information Index Aaker, Jennifer, 110, 111 competition, 173 Abdera, 242, 310, 314, 315, 317 longevity, 179 Abel, N. H., 185 Oresteia, 197, 200, 201 Academos, 189, 323, 324, 325, 337 papyri, 15 Academy, 322, 325, 326, 329, 337, 343, 385, 391, Persians, 183 399, 404, 427, 434, 448, 476, 477–8, 512 portraits, 64 Achilles Tatius, 53, 116, 137, 551 Ptolemaic era, 39 papyri, 16, 23 Aeschylus (astronomer), 249 Acta Alexandrinorum, 87, 604 Aesop, 52, 68, 100, 116, 165 adespota, 55, 79, 81–5, 86, 88, 91, 99, 125, 192, 194, in education, 42 196, 206, 411, 413, 542, 574 papyri, 16, 23 Adkin, Neil, 782 Aethiopia, 354 Adrastus, 483 Aetia, 277 Adrastus (mathematician), 249 Africa, 266 Adrianople, 798 Agatharchides, 471 Aedesius (martyr), 734, 736 Agathocles (historian), 243 Aegae, 479, 520 Agathocles (peripatetic), 483 Aegean, 338–43 Agathon, 280 Aegina, 265 Agias (historian), 373 Aelianus (Platonist), 484 agrimensores, 675 Aelius Aristides, 133, 657, 709 Ai Khanoum, 411 papyri, 16 Akhmatova, Anna, 186 Aelius Herodian (grammarian), 713 Albertus Magnus, 407 Aelius Promotus, 583 Albinus, 484 Aenesidemus, 478–9, 519, 520 Alcaeus, 49, 59, 61–2, 70, 116, 150, 162, 214, 246, Aeolia, 479 see also Aeolian Aeolian, 246 papyri, 15, 23 Aeschines, 39, 59, 60, 64, 93, 94, 123, 161, 166, 174, portraits, 65, 67 184, 211, 213, 216, 230, 232, 331 Alcidamas, 549 commentaries, 75 papyri, 16 Ctesiphon, 21 Alcinous, 484 False Legation, 22 Alcmaeon, 310
    [Show full text]
  • B Philosophy (General) B
    B PHILOSOPHY (GENERAL) B Philosophy (General) For general philosophical treatises and introductions to philosophy see BD10+ Periodicals. Serials 1.A1-.A3 Polyglot 1.A4-Z English and American 2 French and Belgian 3 German 4 Italian 5 Spanish and Portuguese 6 Russian and other Slavic 8.A-Z Other. By language, A-Z Societies 11 English and American 12 French and Belgian 13 German 14 Italian 15 Spanish and Portuguese 18.A-Z Other. By language, A-Z 20 Congresses Collected works (nonserial) 20.6 Several languages 20.8 Latin 21 English and American 22 French and Belgian 23 German 24 Italian 25 Spanish and Portuguese 26 Russian and other Slavic 28.A-Z Other. By language, A-Z 29 Addresses, essays, lectures Class here works by several authors or individual authors (31) Yearbooks see B1+ 35 Directories Dictionaries 40 International (Polyglot) 41 English and American 42 French and Belgian 43 German 44 Italian 45 Spanish and Portuguese 48.A-Z Other. By language, A-Z Terminology. Nomenclature 49 General works 50 Special topics, A-Z 51 Encyclopedias 1 B PHILOSOPHY (GENERAL) B Historiography 51.4 General works Biography of historians 51.6.A2 Collective 51.6.A3-Z Individual, A-Z 51.8 Pictorial works Study and teaching. Research Cf. BF77+ Psychology Cf. BJ66+ Ethics Cf. BJ66 Ethics 52 General works 52.3.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 52.5 Problems, exercises, examinations 52.65.A-Z By school, A-Z Communication of information 52.66 General works 52.67 Information services 52.68 Computer network resources Including the Internet 52.7 Authorship Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Spring 2010 Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Jason Skirry University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Skirry, Jason, "Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Abstract This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is based on his Augustinian theory of the mind’s perfection, which consists in maximizing the mind’s ability to successfully access, comprehend, and follow God’s Order through practices that purify and cognitively enhance the mind’s attention. I argue that the mind’s perfection figures centrally in Malebranche’s philosophy and is the main hub that connects and reconciles the three fundamental principles of his system, namely, his occasionalism, divine illumination, and freedom. To demonstrate this, I first present, in chapter one, Malebranche’s philosophy within the historical and intellectual context of his membership in the French Oratory, arguing that the Oratory’s particular brand of Augustinianism, initiated by Cardinal Bérulle and propagated by Oratorians such as Andre Martin, is at the core of his philosophy and informs his theory of perfection. Next, in chapter two, I explicate Augustine’s own theory of perfection in order to provide an outline, and a basis of comparison, for Malebranche’s own theory of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ineffectiveness of Hermeneutics. Another Augustine's Legacy In
    The ineffectiveness of hermeneutics. Another Augustine’s legacy in Gadamer Alberto Romele To cite this version: Alberto Romele. The ineffectiveness of hermeneutics. Another Augustine’s legacy in Gadamer. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, Taylor & Francis, 2015, 75 (5), pp.422-439. 10.1080/21692327.2015.1027789. hal-01303281 HAL Id: hal-01303281 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01303281 Submitted on 17 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Ineffectiveness of Hermeneutics. Another Augustine’s Legacy in Gadamer Alberto Romele Institute of Philosophy, University of Porto COSTECH Laboratory, University of Technology of Compiègne This article builds on Gadamer’s rehabilitation of the Augustinian concept of inner word (ver- bum in corde). Unlike most interpretions, the thesis is that the Augustinian inner word does not show the potentialities, but rather the ineffectiveness of ontological hermeneutics. In the first section, it is argued that for the later Augustine the verbum in corde is the consequence of a Word- and Truth- event. In the second section, the author suggests that Gadamer has properly understood the verbum in corde as a matter of faith.
    [Show full text]
  • La Théologie D'al-Farabi Et Son Effet Sur Sa Vision Politique: Suivant Sa
    la théologie d’al-farabi et son effet sur sa vision politique : suivant sa tentative de conciliation entre platon et aristote Assia Ouail To cite this version: Assia Ouail. la théologie d’al-farabi et son effet sur sa vision politique : suivant sa tentative de conciliation entre platon et aristote. Philosophie. Université Paul Valéry - Montpellier III, 2019. Français. NNT : 2019MON30098. tel-03006633v2 HAL Id: tel-03006633 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03006633v2 Submitted on 16 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Délivré par UNIVERSITE PAUL VALERY 3 Préparée au sein de l’école doctorale E 58 Et de l’unité de recherche CRISES (E.A 4424) Spécialité : PHILOSOPHIE Présentée par OUAIL ASSIA LA THEOLOGIE D’AL -FÂRÂBÎ ET SON EFFET SUR SA VISION POLITIQUE Suivant sa Tentative de conciliation entre Platon et Aristote Soutenue le 1er Février 2019 devant le jury composé de M. Jean-Luc PÉRILLIÉ, MCF HDR, Université Paul Valéry Directeur de recherche M. Philippe VALLAT, Professeur, Université de Vienne Rapporteur M. Abbas MAKRAM, Professeur, ENS de Lyon Rapporteur M. Alonso TORDESILLAS, Professeur, Université d’Aix Marseille Membre du jury M.
    [Show full text]