DOCSLIB.ORG

DHS Privacy Logs DHS Privacy FOIA Logs - FY 2018 Received 10/01/18 - 10/31/18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DHS Privacy Logs DHS Privacy FOIA Logs - FY 2018 Received 10/01/18 - 10/31/18 DHS Privacy FOIA Logs - FY 2018 Received 10/01/18 - 10/31/18 Request ID Requester Name Request Description Received Date b)(6) 2019-HQF0-00001 Mckean, Aidan seeking records on behalf of client 10/1/2018 2019-HQF0-00002 (b)(6) requesting to renounce Indian citizenship 10/1/2018 seeking information regarding all "Special Event Threat Assessments" published during FY2017 2019-HQF0-00005 Galante, Paul 10/2/2018 seeking information regarding statistics of Salvadoran removals during what has happened of fiscal year 2019-HQF0-00006 Hurtado, Xiomara 2018 10/2/2018 (b)(6) requesting USCIS number 2019-HQF0-00007 10/2/2018 seeking investigative records related to a private citizen 2019-1-1QF0-00008 10/4/2018 seeking all records pertaining to his complaint 2019-HQF0-00009 10/4/2018 seeking records : 1. to identify total costs of crafting and implementing the family separation policy for FY 2018 and FY 2019 (including funds obligated for and reprogrammed to efforts related to the family separation policy in FY 2018, as well as funds requested for FY 2019); 2. to identify the programs from 2019-HQF0-00010 Evers, Austin which funds for housing and reuniting children separated from their parents have been diverted, as well as 10/4/2018 the amount of funding diverted from those programs (Date Range for Record Search: From 1/20/2018 To 10/4/2018) seeking information regarding to: records reflecting communications of political appointees regarding the cost of the family separation policy, including: a. the availability or unavailability of budgeted, obligated, or appropriated funds; b. any evaluation, assessment, or analysis of currently available appropriations that could be used to fund implementation of the family separation policy; and c. constraints on planning for 2019-HQF0-00011 Evers, Austin funding of the family separation policy and the appropriations, budgeting requests, and costs involved with 10/4/2018 the implementation of the family separation policy between such political appointees and Congress, including congressional committees or staff 2019-HQF0-00012 Johnson, Jason seeking logs and geodata for successful delivery of presidential alert 10/4/2018 seeking copies of the letters of support issued by members of Congress to the Department of Homeland Security in support of grant applications for any of the following organizations: University of Michigan and 2019-HQF0-00013 Bruno, Frank University of Southern California for the fiscal years FY2016-FY2018 10/4/2018 2019-HQF0-00014 b)(6) seeking information in reference to a court case regarding himself 10/4/2018 seeking email communications between 1) Gene Hamilton and 2) any email addresses ending in 2019-HQF0-00015 Evers, Austin .com/.net/.org/.edu/.mail (Date Range for Record Search: From 1/20/2017 To 10/31/2017) 10/4/2018 seeking the full text of the DHS request sent to the Secretary of the Interior and Interior Department to provide increased staffing on Department of Interior lands as noted in the attached Interior memorandum 2019-HQF0-00016 GREEN, MIRANDA dated May 9, 2018 10/5/2018 1. communications, including records demonstrating or related to communications, between DHS and the FBI or state and local enforcement entities relating to Occupy ICE, Families Belong Together, and similar protests and anti-ICE, proimmigration groups. 2. Records, including memos, talking points, policies or protocols, regarding any type of coordination between DHS and the FBI or state and local enforcement entities relating to these protests. 3. Communications, and records, such as memos, policies, protocols, manuals, talking points, or threat assessments, relating to these protests. 4. Any multimedia produced by, or in the possession, of DHS in the course of surveillance of the protests; and any records or communications indicating the existence of or consideration of producing such multimedia. 5. Records or 2019-HQF0-00017 Currier, Cora communication, including emails, policies, protocols, memos, operation manuals, regarding the use of 10/4/2018 social media monitoring during or before these protests, including regarding the use of social media surveillance software, including but not limited to programs such as Geofeedia, LifeRaft and Media Sonar. 6. Records or communication, received or regarding the existence, development or compilation of information by OHS, on specifically named individuals or groups associated with these protests. 1. a complete list of all databases or watch lists used by Secure Flight; 2. all criteria and guidelines for inclusion in, and/or removal rom databases or watch lists used by Secure Flight; 3. any memoranda of understanding, information sharing agreements, or any other documents between TSA and CDC, CBP, or 2019-HQF0-00018 Zhou, Enid other federal agencies concerning the exchange of data about individuals that are on Secure Flight program 10/4/2018 watch lists, 4. All documents relating to the current number of individuals on each Secure Flight program watch list copy of the following documents identified to DHS Task Order 7ORDAD18FR0000058 (under contract 2019-HQF0-00019 Santos, Rose GS00Q140ADU108) 10/9/2018 seeking all FOIA requests received by the FOIA office from October 1, 2012 - September 30, 2018, with the following data fields: (a) Assigned request tracking number; (b) Office (where multiple components) ; (c) 2019-HQF0-00020 Long, Susan Date of request ; (d) Date request was received; (e) Track assigned; (f) Date closed (Date Range for 10/9/2018 Record Search: From 10/1/2012 To 9/30/2018) seeking any documentation, contracts, written or oral agreements, notes on conversations communications with, invoices, payment records, directives, memorandums, emails, paper, or electronic correspondence between the Department of Homeland Security, its Illinois-based Fusion Centers in Springfield, Illinois and 2019-HQF0-00021 Adams, Eloise Chicago, Illinois and the Illinois Department of Human Services, and the Illinois Department of Human 10/9/2018 Services Kankakee County FCRC Hub and Illinois Department of Human Services Kankakee County FCRC Office legal analysis prepared by or for the Department supporting its policy of separating families apprehended 2019-HQF0-00022 Heath, Brad at the Southwest border 10/9/2018 seeking records created since the enactment of the REAL-ID Act of 2005 of or pertaining to any grants issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to states, territories, or other entities for 2019-HQF0-00023 Hasbrouck, Edward implementation of the REAL-ID Act, the State-To- State (S2S) system, and/or the State Pointer Exchange 10/9/2018 Systems (SPEXS) seeking a copy of the contract (Task Order) title page (1st page only) and the current Statement of 2019-HQF0-00024 Santos, Rose Work/Performance Work Statement (SOW/PWS) for contract numbers: HSHQDC17F00061, 10/9/2018 HSHQDC17F00106, and 7ORNPP18FR0000054 October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 FY2018 - DHS Privacy Logs DHS Privacy FOIA Logs - FY 2018 Received 10/01/18 - 10/31/18 seeking all records regarding the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's secretary Kirstjen Nielsen's visits to the Trump International Hotel Washington D.C. on or around Sept. 8, 2018 and Sept. 26, 2018 and all 2019-HQF0-00025 Everson, Zach copies of receipts submitted for reimbursement of expenses at the Trump International Hotel Washington, 10/9/2018 D.C. b)(6) 2019-HQF0-00026 seeking records on herself 10/9/2018 seeking a copy of the contract (Task Order) title page (1st page only) and the current Statement of Work/Performance Work Statement (SOW/PWS) for contract numbers HSHQDC16F00077 and 2019-HQF0-00027 Santos, Rose 10/10/2018 HSHQDC16F00202 referral from DHS Office of Inspector General of 651 pages of OPS records regarding the 858 people 2019-HQF0-00029 KEEFE, BRENDAN erroneously granted citizenship by USCIS 10/11/2018 e-mail communications from September 1, 2018, through September 30, 2018, between all political appointees in the following DHS offices: a) The Immediate Office of the Secretary, including the Office of the Chief of Staff; b) The Office of Legislative Affairs; and c) The Office of Public Affairs and the following offices and persons: 1. Congressman David Rouzer or anyone from his office, including but not limited to b)(6) I 2. Congressman Mark Walker or anyone from his office, including but not limited to1(131(61 13.Congressman Richard Hudson or anyone from his office, including but not limited to(b)(6) and 14. Congressman George Holding or anyone from his office, including but not limited to (b)(6) 5. Congressman James Clyburn or anyone from his office, including but not limited tol(b)(61 16. Congressman Patrick McHenry or anyone from his office, including but not limited tcl(b)(6) and (131(61 I 7. Congressman G.K. Butterfield or anyone from his office, including but not limited tokb)(61 (131(61 18. Congresswoman Virginia Foxx or anyone from her office, including but not limited tol(b)(6) 19. Congressman 2019-HQF0-00030 Evers, Austin Walter B. Jones, Jr. or anyone from his office, including but not limited tol(b)(6) 10/11/2018 andkb)(6) 10. Congressman Greg Walden or anyone from his office, including but not limited to 1031(61 1 11 Any st if member of the House Energy & Commerce Committee, including but not limited to b)(6) 1 12. Senator Richard Burr or anyone from his office, including but not limited to b)(6) and anyone whose email ends in b)(6) 113. Senator Thom Tillis or anyone from his office, including but not limited tokb)(6) land anyone whose email ends in (KVA) 114. Senator Tim Scott or anyone from his office, including but not limited to (b)(6) (b)(6) I and anyone whose email ends in (b)(6) 1(Date Range for Record Search: From 9/1/2018 To 9/30/2018) communications sent or received by any DHS political appointees from September 1, 2018, through September 30, 2018, that contain any of the following terms: a) Pork, b) Pig, c) Pigs, d) Hog, e) Hogs, f) Swine, g) Manure, h) NCPC, i) NPPC, j) Smithfield, k) Murphy-Brown; l).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Driver's Licenses, State ID, and Michigan Immigrants
    Driver’s Licenses, State ID, and Michigan Immigrants DRAFT Introduction Since 2008, Michigan has required applicants for driver’s licenses and state identification to provide proof of U.S. citizenship or immigration status. This change was part of a series of post-9/11 changes, and has had significant consequences for all Michiganders who use the roads. Ten states, plus the District of Columbia, have already changed their laws to permit some form of legal driving without proof of immigration status.1 States have chosen to restore access to driver’s licenses irrespective of immigration status to address significant economic and public safety-related challenges posed by greatly-increased numbers of unlicensed drivers, including reductions the agricultural workforce, exclusion from the insurance market, This report highlights the economic and safety benefits to all Michigan residents of expanding access to driver’s licenses for all otherwise-eligible Michigan drivers. Section One describes the legal background, the federal REAL ID Act and states’ relationship to it; Section Two explores potential benefits to the State of Michigan by allowing more individuals to be eligible for state driver’s licenses and identification cards; and Section Three states specific recommended changes to Michigan law. Section 1: Background A. Background of Michigan Driver’s Licenses & REAL ID Act Compliance Prior to 2008, Michigan law contained no requirement that an applicant for a driver’s license or state ID card needed a specific immigration or citizenship status in order to be eligible. Applicants did have to submit documents that were sufficient to prove identity and establish state residency.
    [Show full text]
  • 42Genno44.Pdf
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP Decisions [USCBP 2007–0061; CBP Dec. No. 08–26] RIN 1651–AA69 8 CFR Parts 212 and 235 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Parts 41 and 53 Documents Required for Travelers Departing From or Arriving in the United States at Sea and Land Ports-of-Entry From Within the Western Hemisphere AGENCIES: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the second phase of a joint Depart- ment of Homeland Security and Department of State plan, known as the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, to implement new docu- mentation requirements for U.S. citizens and certain nonimmigrant aliens entering the United States. This final rule details the docu- ments U.S. citizens1 and nonimmigrant citizens of Canada, Ber- muda, and Mexico will be required to present when entering the United States from within the Western Hemisphere at sea and land ports-of-entry. DATES: This final rule is effective on June 1, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Department of Homeland Security: Colleen Manaher, WHTI, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 1 ‘‘U.S. citizens’’ as used in this rule refers to both U.S. citizens and U.S. non-citizen na- tionals. 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 42, NO. 44, OCTOBER 23, 2008 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 5.4–D, Washington, DC 20229, telephone number (202) 344–1220. Department of State: Consuelo Pachon, Office of Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, tele- phone number (202) 663–2662.
    [Show full text]
  • REAL ID Act REAL ID Act and REAL ID
    REAL ID Act REAL ID Act and REAL ID Federal law . Enacted in 2005 . Establishes state-issued driver’s license and identification card standards . Regulated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security . States will continue to issue their own unique licenses and maintain its own records. Current Minnesota Law CHAPTER 92–H.F. No. 988 (2009) An act relating to drivers' licenses; prohibiting commissioner of public safety from complying with Real ID Act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REAL ID ACT. The commissioner of public safety is prohibited from taking any action to implement or to plan for the implementation by this state of those sections of Public Law 109-13 known as the Real ID Act. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment. A REAL ID is now required for…. From the Dept. of Homeland Security: . “Starting October 10, visitors seeking access to military bases and almost all Federal facilities using their state- issued driver’s licenses or identification cards must present proper identification issued by REAL ID compliant states or a state that has received an extension.” . “When planning a visit to a Federal facility or military base, visitors should contact the facility to determine what identification will be accepted.” DHS Provides Updates on REAL ID Enforcement October 9, 2015 http://www.dhs.gov/news/2015/10/09/dhs-provides- updates-real-id-enforcement A REAL ID will be required for…. No sooner than 2016: . A REAL ID will be required to board a federally regulated commercial aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • REAL ID Act List of Acceptable Forms of Identification
    REAL ID Act List of Acceptable Forms of Identification The following information is extracted from REAL ID Act of 2005 Implementation: An Interagency Security Committee Guide. It is intended to provide options for consideration regarding acceptable forms of identification. For access to Sandia-controlled premises, DOE is the authority for determining which identification documents are acceptable, and not all of the documents below may necessarily be approved by DOE. This list is neither authoritative nor exhaustive and is subject to change at any time in accordance with DOE direction. 1) Federally-issued Identification a. U.S. Passport b. U.S. Passport Card c. PIV or Federally-issued Personal Identification Verification – Interoperable (PIV-I) Cards d. Driver’s License issued by the U.S. Department of State e. Border Crossing Card (Form DSP-150) f. DHS “Trusted Traveler” Cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST) g. U.S. Military ID (all members of the U.S. Armed Forces [including retirees and dependent ID card holders]) and veterans. h. Veterans Health Identification Card issued by the U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs i. U.S. Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551) j. U.S. Certificate of Naturalization or Certificate of Citizenship (Form N-550) k. Employment Authorization Document issued by DHS (Form I-766) l. U.S. Refugee Travel Document or other travel document or evidence of immigration status issued by DHS containing a photograph (Permit to Re-enter Form I-327 and Refugee Travel Document Form I-571) m. Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) n. Merchant Mariner Card issued by DHS/United States Coast Guard (USCG) 2) State-issued Identification o.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security Interim Report to the 80Th Legislature
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND HOMELAND SECURITY REPORT TO THE 80TH LEGISLATURE DECEMBER 2006 S ENATE C OMMITTEE ON T RANSPORTATION AND H OMELAND S ECURITY January 2, 2007 The Honorable David Dewhurst Lieutenant Governor P.O. Box 12068 Austin, Texas 78711 Dear Governor Dewhurst: The Senate Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security is pleased to submit its final report, which considers the Committee's seven interim charges and three joint charges to study and report on: · the state's overweight truck fees; · federal actions regarding the Patriot Act on homeland security activities in Texas; · the implementation of SB 9, 79th Legislature, Regular Session; · TxDOT's ability to build, maintain, and relocate rail facilities; · naming of state highways; · TxDOT's programs to increase safety on all state transportation facilities; · monitor federal, state and local efforts along the Texas Mexico border; · relocation of utilities from state owned right-of-way; · process of allocation by the TxDOT Commission through the Allocation Program; · process by which federal funding sources should be implemented by the TxDOT Commission to comply with funding reductions mandated by Congress. Respectfully submitted, Senator John Carona Senator Gonzalo Barrientos Senator Ken Armbrister Chairman Vice-Chairman Senator Kim Brimer Senator Rodney Ellis Senator Florence Shapiro Senator Eliot Shapleigh Senator Jeff Wentworth Senator Tommy Williams P.O. BOX 12068 • SAM HOUSTON BUILDING, ROOM 445 • AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 512/463-0067 • FAX 512/463-2840 • DIAL 711 FOR RELAY CALLS HTTP://WWW.SENATE.STATE.TX.US/75R/SENATE/COMMIT/C640/C640.HTM Table of Contents Interim Charges............................................................................................................................... 1 Charge 1 -- Overweight Truck Fee Structure.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert W. Titus & Robert J. Olson
    THE ILLEGAL ALIEN THREAT TO AMERICA’S SENIOR CITIZENS Herbert W. Titus & Robert J. Olson TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE 909 N. Washington St., #300 Alexandria, Virginia 22814 (703) 548-5568 [Inside Front Cover] TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE Mission Statement. TREA Senior Citizen’s League (TSCL) is dedicated to serving our members by defending and protecting their earned retirement benefits by working with the U.S. Congress, the executive branch, and federal government agencies and departments. Tax Status. TSCL is a tax-exempt citizens action/social welfare organization under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to TREA Senior Citizens League are not tax deductible. Copyright (C) 2006, TREA Senior Citizens League AUTHORS’ BACKGROUND Herbert W. Titus. Mr. Titus is a practicing attorney, specializing in constitutional litigation and legislative strategy. A member of the Virginia Bar, Mr. Titus is Of Counsel to the McLean, Virginia law firm of William J. Olson, P.C., and is associated with the Premier Law Group in Virginia Beach, Virginia. A graduate of the Harvard Law School, Mr. Titus has taught constitutional law at five ABA-approved law schools over a 30-year span. He is the author of numerous scholarly articles on various constitutional law subjects, and is a co-author of various legal briefs on constitutional issues filed in the United States Supreme Court and in other federal and state courts. Robert J. Olson. Mr. Olson is a 2005 graduate of the College of William & Mary with a B.A. degree in History and Government. [First right hand page] PREFACE Every day since 9/11, it seems we Americans are told how illegal aliens threaten our way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedited Removal of Aliens: Legal Framework
    Expedited Removal of Aliens: Legal Framework Updated October 8, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45314 SUMMARY R45314 Expedited Removal of Aliens: Legal Framework October 8, 2019 The federal government has broad authority over the admission of non-U.S. nationals (aliens) seeking to enter the United States. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government Hillel R. Smith may exclude such aliens without affording them the due process protections that traditionally Legislative Attorney apply to persons physically present in the United States. Instead, aliens seeking entry are entitled only to those procedural protections that Congress has expressly authorized. Consistent with this broad authority, Congress established an expedited removal process for certain aliens who have arrived in the United States without permission. In general, aliens whom immigration authorities seek to remove from the United States may challenge that determination in administrative proceedings with attendant statutory rights to counsel, evidentiary requirements, and appeal. Under the streamlined expedited removal process created by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and codified in Section 235(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), however, certain aliens deemed inadmissible by an immigration officer may be removed from the United States without further administrative hearings or review. INA Section 235(b)(1) applies only to certain aliens who are inadmissible into the United States because they either lack valid entry documents or have attempted to procure their admission through fraud or misrepresentation. The statute generally permits the government to summarily remove those aliens if they are arriving in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Review Enhanced Driver's Licenses and REAL ID: Driver's License Update Information Can Be Shared with the Federal Government
    National Conference of State Legislatures TRANSPORTATION RE VI E W ENHANC E D DRIV E R 'S LIC E NS E S AND REAL ID: DRIV E R 'S LIC E NS E UPDAT E by Anne Teigen July 2009 Beginning June 1,2009, the 17 states that border Canada or Mexico and countless port cities will require U.S. citizens re-entering the United States by land or sea to show a passport or other approved document. Citizens from Canada and Mexico who enter the United States also will have to show approved documentation. These new requirements affect business and vacation travelers as well as industry. A state-issued, enhanced driver’s license can be issued to citizens who want to cross the borders without using a passport. Enhanced Driver’s Licenses and the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA) mandates the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of State (DOS) to develop and implement a plan to require U.S. citizens and foreign nationals to present a passport or other appropriate identity and citizenship documentation when entering the United States from Canada, Mexico and other Caribbean countries. DHS and DOS developed the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) to implement the congressional mandate. The initiative requires all U.S. citizens entering the United States at sea or land ports of entry to show proof of identity and proof of U.S. citizenship by presenting a passport, a passport card or other documents approved by the DHS.1 All U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration: Analysis of the Major Provisions Ofthe REAL ID Act of 2005
    Order Code RL32754 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Immigration: Analysis of the Major Provisions of the REAL ID Act of 2005 Updated May 25, 2005 Michael John Garcia, Margaret Mikyung Lee, and Todd Tatelman Legislative Attorneys American Law Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Immigration: Analysis of the Major Provisions the REAL ID Act of 2005 Summary During the 108th Congress, a number of proposals related to immigration and identification-document security were introduced, some of which were considered in the context of implementing recommendations made by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9/11 Commission) and enacted pursuant to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-458). At the time that the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act was adopted, some congressional leaders reportedly agreed to revisit certain immigration and document-security issues in the 109th Congress that had been dropped from the final version of the act. The REAL ID Act of 2005 was first introduced as H.R. 418 by Representative James Sensenbrenner on January 26, 2005, and passed the House, as amended, on February 10, 2005. The text of House-passed H.R. 418 was subsequently added to H.R. 1268, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005, which was introduced by Representative Jerry Lewis on March 11, 2005, and passed the House, as amended, on March 16, 2005. H.R. 1268 passed the Senate on April 21, 2005, as amended, on a vote of 99- 0, but did not include the REAL ID Act provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrants and Michigan Driver's Licenses
    Immigrants and Michigan Driver’s Licenses: Past, Present, and Future Updated: December 2018 Looking back: Michigan licenses issued regardless of immigration status Prior to 2008, Michigan law contained no requirement that an applicant for a driver’s license or state ID card needed a specific immigration or citizenship status in order to be eligible. Applicants did have to submit documents that were sufficient to prove their identity, and they had to show that they were residents of Michigan. A 1995 Michigan Attorney General Opinion stated that because the law had no immigration status requirement, an “illegal alien” could not be denied a driver’s license on that basis.1 The opinion also stated that there was no legal reason why an “illegal alien” could not be considered a resident of a state. In December of 2007, Attorney General Mike Cox issued a new opinion that reversed that finding.2 The 2007 opinion stated that an unauthorized immigrant cannot be considered a Michigan resident and, in fact, only a Lawful Permanent Resident, sometimes known as a “green card” holder, could be considered a Michigan resident under the law. Where we are: “legal presence” requirements and use of foreign licenses The Michigan Secretary of State implemented the 2007 AG opinion in early 2008. It had the immediate effect of denying licenses to all people who are undocumented. In addition, it excluded dozens of categories of legally present noncitizens who live and work in Michigan who have not been granted Lawful Permanent Resident status. To clarify who was
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Facts About REAL ID
    N A T I O N A L I MMIGRATION L A W C ENTER | WWW . NILC . ORG Basic Facts About REAL ID JANUARY 2016 Section 202(d)(11) of the REAL ID Act specifically continue to recognize their driver’s licenses as allows states to issue licenses that won’t be identification for every other purpose, even if they acceptable for certain official federal purposes. won’t be accepted as identification for official federal purposes. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has certified as REAL ID–compliant states that issue REAL ID does not apply to all federal purposes. As both a REAL ID–compliant license that is acceptable DHS has made clear: for certain federal official purposes and a license that Access for activities directly relating to safety and is not. One such state is Maryland. health or life preserving services, to law enforcement, and to constitutionally protected Under REAL ID, states have great latitude in activities, including legal and investigative deciding who can obtain a license that is not proceedings will not be affected. acceptable for official federal purposes. They can offer the same noncompliant license to U.S. citizens Driver’s licenses and passports are not the only and lawfully present immigrants as they offer to documents that federal agencies can accept as people who cannot prove that they are lawfully identification. DHS advises that “[w]hen planning a present in the U.S. One state that does this is visit to a Federal facility or military base, visitors Vermont. As DHS has made clear: should contact the facility to determine what identification will be accepted.” An earlier FAQ DHS cautions against assuming that possession of issued by DHS explained that “[e]ach agency a noncompliant card indicates the holder is an determines whether identification documents are undocumented individual, given that several states needed for the purpose it oversees and, if applicable, issue noncompliant licenses for reasons unrelated to lawful presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism and Asylum Seekers: Why the Real ID Act Is a False Promise Marisa S
    Working Paper Series Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Year 2006 Terrorism and Asylum Seekers: Why the Real ID Act Is a False Promise Marisa S. Cianciarulo Villanova Law School, [email protected] This paper is posted at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/wps/art42 ARTICLE TERRORISM AND ASYLUM SEEKERS: WHY THE REAL ID ACT IS A FALSE PROMISE Marisa Silenzi Cianciarulo The Real ID Act, passed on May 11, 2005, is the first post –September 11 antiterrorism legislation specifically to target a group of vulnerable ind ivi duals to whom the United States has historically granted protection: asylum seekers. The passage of the Real ID Act led asylum advocates to wring their hands in despair and immigration restrictionists to clap their hands in glee. This Article argues that b oth sides of the debate may have been justified in their reactions, but not because of the immediate chilling impact on asylum that they seem to expect. With regard to requirements for establishing asylum eligibility, the Real ID Act, rather than imposing new, onerous restrictions on asylum, codifies case law upon which adjudicators, advocates, and gover nment attorneys have been relying for decades. However, several areas of poor drafting, combined with legislative history mischaracterizing the asylum sy ste m as a haven for terrorists and suicide bombers, may result in the denial of bona fide asylum applications. This Article provides concrete guidance for adjudicators, advocates, and government attorneys applying the Real ID Act to asylum cases. It examines the case law upon which some of the provisions are based and offers interpretations for unclear provisions.
    [Show full text]