DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Year 2021 IHBG Allocations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiscal Year 2021 IHBG Allocations Fiscal Year 2021 IHBG allocations State Recipient City Amount Alaska Afognak Kodiak $74,615 Agdaagux Tribe of King King Cove $132,354 Cove AHTNA, Incorporated Glennallen $1,741,115 Akhiok Akhiok $74,406 Akiachak Akiachak $376,480 Akiak Akiak $255,423 Akutan Akutan $74,456 Alakanuk Alakanuk $453,288 Alatna Allakaket $74,406 Aleknagik Aleknagik $93,158 Aleut Corporation Anchorage $1,784,313 Algaaciq (St. Mary's) St. Mary's $282,878 Allakaket Allakaket $191,536 Alutiiq (Old Harbor) Old Harbor $124,269 Ambler Ambler $188,056 Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass $167,468 Angoon Angoon $104,982 Aniak Aniak $222,415 Anvik Anvik $91,588 Arctic Slope Regional Barrow $2,907,273 Corporation Arctic Village Arctic Village $159,684 Asa'Carsarmiut (Mountain Mountain Village $500,450 Village) Atka Atka $74,406 Atmauthluak Atmautluak $176,964 Atqasuk (Atkasook) Atqasuk $95,028 Barrow Barrow $1,469,911 Beaver Beaver $89,977 Belkofski King Cove $74,406 Bering Straits Native Nome $2,321,089 Corporation Bill Moore's Slough Kotlik $74,406 Birch Creek Fairbanks $74,406 Brevig Mission Brevig Mission $248,661 Bristol Bay Native Anchorage $1,489,882 Corporation Buckland Buckland $305,957 Calista Corporation Anchorage $3,951,989 Cantwell Cantwell $74,406 Chalkyitsik Chalkyitsik $116,949 Cheesh-Na Gakona $74,406 Chefornak Chefornak $273,504 Chenega (Chanega) Chenega Bay $74,406 Chevak Chevak $665,425 Chickaloon Chickaloon $98,511 Chignik Bay Tribal Council Chignik $74,406 Chignik Lagoon Chignik Lagoon $74,406 Chignik Lake Chignik Lake $74,406 Chilkat (Klukwan) Haines $74,406 Chilkoot (Haines) Haines $90,184 Chinik (Golovin) Golovin $137,174 Chitina Chitina $74,406 Chuathbaluk (Russian Chuathbaluk $79,694 Mission, Kuskokwim) Chugach Alaska Corporation Anchorage $2,634,643 Chuloonawick Emmonak $74,406 Circle Circle $94,944 Clark's Point Clarks Point $74,406 Cook Inlet Region, Inc. Anchorage $14,054,072 Council Nome $74,406 Craig Craig $126,441 Crooked Creek Crooked Creek $74,572 Curyung (Dillingham) Dillingham $576,409 Deering Deering $83,722 Diomede (Inalik) Diomede $80,299 Dot Lake Fairbanks $74,406 Douglas Juneau $358,133 Doyon, Ltd. Fairbanks $5,065,938 Eagle Eagle $74,406 Eek Eek $371,653 Egegik Egegik $74,406 Eklutna Chugiak $74,402 Ekuk Dillingham $74,406 Ekwok Ekwok $74,406 Elim Elim $231,067 Emmonak Emmonak $418,348 Evansville (Bettles Field) Bettles $74,406 Eyak Cordova $123,248 False Pass False Pass $74,406 Fort Yukon Fort Yukon $439,016 Gakona Gakona $74,406 Galena (Louden Village) Galena $156,281 Gambell Gambell $499,724 Georgetown Anchorage $74,406 Goodnews Bay Goodnews Bay $160,812 Grayling (Hokikachuk) Grayling $159,124 Gulkana Gakona $74,402 Hamilton Kotlik $74,406 Healy Lake Fairbanks $74,406 Holy Cross Holy Cross $132,496 Hoonah Hoonah $135,926 Hooper Bay Hooper Bay $719,364 Hughes Hughes $74,406 Huslia Huslia $220,604 Hydaburg Hydaburg $85,302 Igiugig Igugig $74,406 Iliamna Iliamna $74,406 Iqurmuit Traditional Council Russian Mission $159,670 Ivanof Bay Anchorage $74,406 Kaguyak Akhiok $74,406 Kake Kake $136,527 Kaktovik Kaktovik $105,632 Kalskag Kalskag $179,628 Kaltag Kaltag $100,116 Kanatak Wasilla $74,406 Karluk Karluk $74,406 Kasaan Ketchikan $74,406 Kasigluk Kasigluk $322,265 Kenaitze Kenai $905,894 Ketchikan Ketchikan $899,846 Kiana Kiana $212,029 King Island Nome $216,315 King Salmon King Salmon $74,406 Kipnuk Kipnuk $601,260 Kivalina Kivalina $380,259 Klawock Klawock $107,089 Kluti Kaah (Copper Center) Copper Center $84,479 Knik Wasilla $1,390,299 Kobuk Kobuk $74,565 Kokhanok Kokhanok $119,642 Kongiganak Kongiganak $286,057 Koniag, Incorporated Kodiak $3,698,764 Kotlik Kotlik $379,205 Kotzebue Kotzebue $1,087,607 Koyuk Koyuk $136,400 Koyukuk Koyukuk $137,062 Kwethluk Kwethluk $470,086 Kwigillingok Kwigillingok $174,063 Kwinhagak (Quinhagak) Quinhagak $453,324 Larsen Bay Larsen Bay $74,406 Levelock Levelock $74,600 Lime Village McGrath $74,406 Lower Kalskag Lower Kalskag $219,254 Manley Hot Springs Manley Hot $74,406 Springs Manokotak Manokotak $346,126 Marshall (Fortuna Ledge) Marshall $225,531 Mary's Igloo Teller $74,406 McGrath McGrath $74,705 Mekoryuk Mekoryuk $121,968 Mentasta Mentasta Lake $83,720 Metlakatla (Annette Island) Metlakatla $1,370,241 Minto Minto $132,568 Naknek Naknek $74,636 NANA Corporation Anchorage $2,802,479 Nanwelek (English Bay) Nanwalek $74,707 Napaimute Bethel $74,406 Napakiak Napakiak $312,204 Napaskiak Napaskiak $246,644 Nelson Lagoon Nelson Lagoon $74,406 Nenana Nenana $80,379 New Koliganek Koliganek $113,915 New Stuyahok New Stuyahok $338,069 Newhalen Newhalen $79,792 Newtok Newtok $233,821 Nightmute Nightmute $136,808 Nikolai Nikolai $83,126 Nikolski Nikolski $74,406 Ninilchik Ninilchik $390,053 Noatak Noatak $213,420 Nome Eskimo Community Nome $857,717 Nondalton Nondalton $91,744 Noorvik Noorvik $326,887 Northway Northway $133,351 Nuiqsut (Nooiksut) Nuiqsut $172,116 Nulato Nulato $157,060 Nunakauyarmiut (Toksook Toksook Bay $316,173 Bay) Nunam Iqua (Sheldon's Nunam Iqua $74,683 Point) Nunapitchuk Nunapitchuk $334,523 Ohogamiut Marshall $74,406 Orutsararmuit (Bethel) Bethel $1,909,023 Oscarville Napaskiak $74,406 Ouzinkie Ouzinkie $74,518 Paimiut Hooper Bay $74,406 Pauloff Harbor Village Sand Point $74,406 Pedro Bay Pedro Bay $74,406 Perryville Perryville $77,155 Petersburg Petersburg $123,528 Pilot Point Pilot Point $74,406 Pilot Station Pilot Station $364,520 Pitka's Point St. Mary's $79,063 Platinum Platinum $74,401 Point Hope Point Hope $357,512 Point Lay Point Lay $181,918 Port Graham Port Graham $74,611 Port Heiden Port Heiden $74,406 Port Lions Port Lions $74,570 Portage Creek Anchorage $74,406 Qagan Tayagungin (Sand Sand Point $192,581 Point) Qawalangin (Unalaska) Unalaska $74,600 Rampart Rampart $74,664 Red Devil Red Devil $74,406 Ruby Ruby $171,511 Saint George Island St George Island $74,406 Saint Michael St. Michael $294,425 Saint Paul Island St. Paul Island $184,628 Salamatoff Kenai $74,427 Savoonga Savoonga $667,863 Saxman Ketchikan $83,066 Scammon Bay Scammon Bay $363,697 Selawik Selawik $454,832 Seldovia Seldovia $74,406 Shageluk Shageluk $93,765 Shaktoolik Shaktoolik $125,765 Shishmaref Shishmaref $464,655 Shungnak Shungnak $139,172 Sitka Tribe (Baranof Island) Sitka $1,179,607 Skagway Skagway $74,556 Sleetmute Sleetmute $74,611 Solomon Nome $74,406 South Naknek Wasilla $74,406 Stebbins Community Stebbins $431,398 Association Stevens Village Stevens Village $74,479 Stony River Stony River $74,451 Sun'aq Tribe of Kodiak Kodiak $329,366 (Shoonaq') Takotna Takotna $74,484 Tanacross Tanacross $129,552 Tanana Tanana $175,311 Tangirnaq (Lesnoi) Kodiak $74,406 Tatitlek Tatitlek $74,406 Tazlina Glennallen $74,406 Telida McGrath $74,406 Teller Teller $151,668 Tetlin Tetlin $94,216 Tlingit and Haida Indian Juneau $5,180,030 Tribes Central Council Togiak Togiak $386,478 Tuluksak Tuluksak $258,386 Tuntutuliak Tuntutuliak $369,173 Tununak Tununak $229,709 Twin Hills Twin Hills $78,221 Tyonek Tyonek $163,104 Ugashik Anchorage $74,406 Umkumiut Nightmute $74,406 Unalakleet Unalakleet $288,900 Unga Sand Point $74,406 Venetie Venetie $203,118 Wainwright Wainwright $284,108 Wales Wales $198,165 White Mountain White Mountain $148,329 Wrangell Wrangell $112,346 Yakutat Yakutat $105,364 Yupiit of Andreafski St. Mary's $89,100 Alabama MOWA Band of Choctaw Mt. Vernon $2,078,626 Indians Poarch Band of Creeks Atmore $1,292,204 Arizona Ak-Chin Indian Community Maricopa $475,313 Cocopah Tribe Somerton $918,679 Colorado River Indian Tribes Parker $2,660,973 Fort McDowell Yavapai Fountain Hills $183,047 Nation Gila River Indian Sacaton $7,658,571 Community Havasupai Tribe Supai $138,101 Hopi Tribe Kykotsmovi $6,560,593 Hualapai Indian Tribe Peach Springs $1,697,757 Kaibab Band of Paiute Fredonia $436,555 Indians Navajo Nation Window Rock $72,024,391 Pascua Yaqui Tribe Tucson $4,753,678 Quechan Tribe Winterhaven $1,776,785 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Scottsdale $2,284,108 Indian Community San Carlos Apache Tribe San Carlos $6,209,502 San Juan Southern Paiute Tuba City $102,818 Tribe Tohono O'Odham Nation Sells $10,719,529 Tonto Apache Tribe of Payson $74,406 Arizona White Mountain Apache Whiteriver $7,670,562 (Fort Apache) Yavapai-Apache Nation Camp Verde $1,129,423 (Camp Verde) Yavapai-Prescott Indian Prescott $74,406 Tribe California Agua Caliente Band of Palm Springs $148,555 Cahuilla Indians Alturas Indian Rancheria Alturas $74,406 Augustine Band of Cahuilla Coachella $74,406 Indians Bear River Band of the Loleta $74,406 Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Oroville $537,823 Maidu Indians Big Lagoon Rancheria Trinidad $74,406 Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Big Pine $445,246 Owens Valley Big Sandy Rancheria of Auberry $254,093 Western Mono Indians Big Valley Band of Pomo Lakeport $509,851 Indians Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop $1,339,429 Blue Lake Rancheria Blue Lake $74,406 Bridgeport Indian Colony Bridgeport $208,149 Buena Vista Rancheria of Sacramento $74,406 Me-Wuk Indians Cabazon Band of Mission Indio $74,406 Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Colusa $74,406 Indians, Colusa Rancheria Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville $422,612 Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Indians Anza $74,406 California Valley Miwok Stockton $74,406 Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Campo $668,255 Mission Indians Capitan Grande Band of Lakeside $176,864 Diegueno Mission Indians Cedarville Rancheria Alturas $74,406 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Havasu Lake $863,289 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Trinidad $74,406 Community (Trinidad Rancheria) Cloverdale Rancheria of Cloverdale $257,256 Pomo Indians Cold Springs Rancheria of Tollhouse $431,126 Mono
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010
    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
    [Show full text]
  • The Wintu and Their Neighbors: a Very Small World-System
    THE WINTU AND THEIR NEIGHBORS: A VERY SMALL WORLD-SYSTEM Christopher Chase-Dunn Department of Sociology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, ND 21218 ABSTRACT The world-systems perspective analyzes the modern international system. This approach can be applied to long range social evolution by studying smaller regional intersocietal systems such as the late pre-contact Wintu and their neighbors. Three questions: 1. What was the nature of integration among wintu groups and between them and neighboring groups? 2. What are the spatial characteristics of this network regarding fall­ off of the impact of events? 3. Was there regional soc~ally­ structured inequality in this system? Archaeological data may allow estimation of extent and rate of Wintu expansion, obsidian trade patterns, settlement sizes, and other features of this little world-system. INTRODUCTION This paper describes a theoretical approach for the comparative study of world-systems and a preliminary consideration of a small regional intersocietal system composed of the Wintu people and their neighbors in Northern California. I am currently engaged in the study of two "cases" of relatively small intersocietal networks -- the Wintu-centered system and late prehistoric Hawaii (Chase-Dunn 1991). This paper describes my preliminary hypotheses and examines possibilities for using archaeological, ethnographic, and documentary evidence for answering questions raised by the world-systems perspective. The world-systems perspective is a theoretical approach which has been developed to analyze the dynamics of the Europe­ centered, and now-global, political economy composed of national societies (cf. Wallerstein 1974, 1979; Chase-Dunn 1989; and a very readable introduction in Shannon 1989). One important structure in this modern world-system is the core/periphery hierarchy -- a stratified system of relations among dominant "advanced" core states and dependent and "underdeveloped" peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 20/Tuesday, January
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 30, 2018 / Notices 4235 Type of Information Collection: electronic, mechanical, or other Disaster Grants—Public Assistance Revision of a currently approved technological collection techniques or (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, information collection. other forms of information technology, Hazard Mitigation Grant. OMB Number: 1660–0085. e.g., permitting electronic submission of Brock Long, FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 003–0–1, responses. Administrator, Federal Emergency Crisis Counseling Assistance and Dated: January 25, 2018. Management Agency. Training Program, Immediate Services [FR Doc. 2018–01775 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] Program Application; FEMA Form 003– William H. Holzerland, 0–2, Crisis Counseling Assistance and Sr. Director for Information Management, BILLING CODE 9111–23–P Training Program, Regular Services Mission Support, Department of Homeland Security. Program Application; SF–424, Application for Federal Assistance; SF– [FR Doc. 2018–01765 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BILLING CODE 9111–23–P 424A, Budget Information for Non- Bureau of Indian Affairs Construction Programs; SF–425, Federal Financial Report; HHS Checklist/08– [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND A0A501010.999900 253G] 2007; HHS Project Performance Site SECURITY Location Form; ISP report narrative; Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible Quarterly Report Narratives; Final RSP Federal Emergency Management To Receive Services From the United Report Narrative,. Agency Abstract: The CCP consists of two States Bureau of Indian Affairs [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–3392– grant programs, the Immediate Services AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, EM; Docket ID FEMA–2018–0001] Program (ISP) and the Regular Services Interior. Program (RSP).
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Lo Sciamanismo E Le Tecniche Dell'estasi
    LO SCIAMANISMO E LE TECNICHE DELL'ESTASI di Mircea Eliade 1 Lo Sciamanismo INDICE Introduzione alla prima edizione Introduzione alla seconda edizione Capitolo 1. Generalità. Metodi di reclutamento. Sciamanismo e vocazione mistica. Approssimazioni L'acquisto dei poteri sciamanici Il reclutamento degli sciamani nella Siberia occidentale e centrale Il reclutamento fra i Tungusi Il reclutamento fra i Buriati e gli Altaici Trasmissione ereditaria e ricerca dei poteri sciamanici Sciamanismo e psicopatologia Capitolo 2. Malattie e sogni iniziatici. Malattie iniziatiche Estasi e visioni iniziatiche degli sciamani yakuti Sogni iniziatici degli sciamani samojedi L'iniziazione presso i Tungusi, i Buriati, ecc. L'iniziazione dei maghi australiani Confronti fra Australia, Siberia, America del Sud ecc. Lo smembramento iniziatico nell'America del Nord e del Sud, in Africa e in Indonesia Iniziazione degli sciamani eschimesi La contemplazione del proprio scheletro Iniziazioni tribali e società segrete Capitolo 3: L'acquisto dei poteri sciamanici Miti siberiani sull'origine degli sciamani L'elezione sciamanica presso i Goldi e gli Yakuti L'elezione presso i Buriati e i Teleuti Le donne-spiriti protettrici dello sciamano La parte delle anime dei morti "Vedere gli spiriti" Gli spiriti ausiliari "Linguaggio segreto". "Lingua degli animali" La ricerca dei poteri sciamanici nell'America Settentrionale Capitolo 4: L'iniziazione sciamanica L'iniziazione presso i Tungusi e i Manciù L'iniziazione degli Yakuti, dei Samoiedi e degli Ostiachi 2 Mircea Eliade L'iniziazione
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 5-1993 Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A. Field University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Native American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Field, Margaret A., "Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873" (1993). Graduate Masters Theses. Paper 141. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENOCIDE AND THE INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA , 1769-1873 A Thesis Presented by MARGARET A. FIELD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies and Research of the Un1versity of Massachusetts at Boston in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS MAY 1993 HISTCRY PROGRAM GENOCIDE AND THE I NDIAN S OF CALIFORNIA, 1769-187 3 A Thesis P resented by MARGARET A. FIELD Approved as to style and content by : Clive Foss , Professor Co - Chairperson of Committee mes M. O'Too le , Assistant Professor -Chairpers on o f Committee Memb e r Ma rshall S. Shatz, Pr og~am Director Department of History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank professors Foss , O'Toole, and Buckley f or their assistance in preparing this manuscri pt and for their encouragement throughout the project .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]
  • A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 9 Issue 2 Time, Movement, and Space: Genocide Article 8 Studies and Indigenous Peoples 10-2015 ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Jeremiah J. Garsha University of Cambridge Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Garsha, Jeremiah J. (2015) "‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 9: Iss. 2: 61-75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.2.1292 Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol9/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Acknowledgements The author is grateful to the two anonymous reviewers who strengthened this paper with their careful reading and accurate critiques, to Benjamin Madley who offered valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this paper, and to Jamie Lynnae for her nuanced edits and suggestions. This article is available in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol9/iss2/8 ‘Reclamation Road’: A Microhistory of Massacre Memory in Clear Lake, California Jeremiah J. Garsha University of Cambridge Cambridge, United Kingdom Abstract: This article is a microhistory of not only the massacre of the indigenous Pomo people in Clear Lake, California, but also the memorialization of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • YUROK TRIBE 190 Klamath Boulevard • Post Office Box 1027 • Klamath, CA 95548
    YUROK TRIBE 190 Klamath Boulevard • Post Office Box 1027 • Klamath, CA 95548 Yurok Tribe Written Testimony Regarding H.R. 5548, Fishery Failures: Urgently Needed Disaster Declarations Act January 14th, 2020 INTRODUCTION The Yurok Tribe is a federally recognized Indian tribe whose reservation is located on the Lower Klamath River in Northern California, spanning from the river’s mouth at the Pacific Ocean upriver to the Yurok village of Weitchpec. With more than 6,300 tribal members, the Yurok Tribe is the largest Indian tribe in California. The fishery resources of the Klamath and Pacific Ocean are the mainstay of the life, economy, and culture of the Yurok Tribe. See Mattz v. Arnett, 412 U.S. 481, 486-87 (1973). The Klamath River Indian fishery is “not much less necessary to the existence of the [Yurok] Indians than the atmosphere they breathed.” Blake v. Arnett, 663 F.2d 906, 909 (9th Cir. 1981). A pillar of the Tribe’s legal rights is its federally reserved fishing right which was reserved in the creation of the Yurok Reservation. The Tribe enjoys commercial, subsistence, and ceremonial fishing rights on the lower 45 miles of the Klamath River which it exercises each year under strict regulation by the Yurok Tribal Government. See, Baley v United States, No. 18- 1323 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2019) (confirming Yurok fishing rights for commercial, subsistence, and ceremonial purposes). In this way, the Tribe maintains its fishing way of life. Tribal members are able to fish commercially to provide financial stability to their families, 1 ceremonially to support ancient practices necessary to maintain Yurok world balance, and for subsistence purposes to continue a fishing way of life.
    [Show full text]