DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding Superfund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding Superfund Understanding Superfund In the disposal of ... and simplest toxic waste, 1,riay to get this method rid OF tree is still the problem. cheapest_. Center for Health, Environment & Justice Understanding Superfund Contributors: Ryan Holifield Stephen Lester July 1998 $7.00 plus postage Center for Health, Environment & Justice P.O. Box 6806 Falls Church, VA 22040 (703) 237-2249 [email protected] UNDERSTANDING SUPERFUND Table of Contents Welcome 'o the World of Superfund... 3 A B of Guide to Superfund-Speak 4 The Super and Process... and Its Superflaws 7 Rem val Actions 7 Rem dial Actions 9 • Som Exemptions 13 Publ c Participation, Right-to-Know, and Public Health 16 SA' A Title III 19 Heal h Assessments 19 Rem dial Action Superflaws 20 Liab lity, Enforcement, and Responsible Parties 25 So Now W at? Dealing With a Superflawed Program 28 Fixi g Superfund: The View From the Grassroots 30 The Ghost. of Superfund Past, Present, and Future 33 Superfund Resources 40 Appendix The Superfund Process 44 Appendix . The Remedial Process 45 Appendix : EPA Regional Contact Information 46 Appendix Principles for Superfund Reform 48 1 WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF SUPERFUND... "What 's Superfund, anyway? The hero from a comic book about banker ? A '70's action movie?" Supe d is the common name given to a law passed by the United States II ongress in 1980. Also known as CERCLA (the Comprehensive Enviro ental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act), Superfund gives th federal government authority and funding to clean up the nation's most dangerous abandoned hazardous waste sites. CERCLA was foll wed by SARA... "Sara? Doesn't she make coffee cakes? What does she have to do with Superfund?" No, that' Sara Lee. SARA stands for "Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act," passed i 1986. SARA reauthorized the Superfund program and added several significant amendm nts to CERCLA. There haven't been any major amendments since then, but the program as renewed again in 1990. Since 1994, Congress has been debating about how to reform t program--and keeping the program alive on a year-by-year basis. "Just ho many of these abandoned hazardous waste sites are there?" As of Feb ary 1998, there were 10,670 sites in the United States CERCLIS database, which lists all hazard us waste sites that have been reported to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). An additi nal 30,650 sites have been "archived"; that is, the EPA has decided they require no further co sideration for Superfund cleanups? But there are currently only about 1,200 sites on the Natio 1 Priority List, the list of sites that qualify for remedial actions, or full-scale permanen Super-fund cleanups. "Yikes. A d how many have they actually cleaned up?" Good ques ion. The EPA considers sites to be "cleaned up" when a phase of the cleanup called the remedi 1 construction is finished. As of the end of February 1998, the EPA reported that constructio at 509 sites was complete, and the construction at another 470 was underway. 2 But the vast m ority of these sites are still in the process of being cleaned. The EPA reported at the end of Apri 1998 that the number of sites deleted from the National Priority List--and therefore no longer c nsidered threatening to public health or the environment--is only 168? How many of these sit are truly clean and safe for communities? No one really knows--but given the inadequate tandards for most cleanulys, probably only a very small number no longer pose any threat to pu lic health or the environment. 3 The EPA has also conducted over 4,600 emergency removal actions, which take care of immediate threats but seldom clean sites permanently.' "I see. And who's paying for all this?" More and more often, the polluters--Responsible Parties (RPs)--themselves: they now pay for and conduct over 75% of the long-term cleanup actions. 5 As for the other 25%, the money comes from the Superfund trust fund and the annual Superfund budget, which are financed primarily by taxes on chemical and petroleum companies. (However, the EPA has not collected all the money that the polluters have committed to pay. Responsible Parties have committed over $12 billion, but as of 1993, the EPA had only collected about 14% of this money--and it still has a long way to go.) 6 "And just how long does one of these cleanups take?" Until recently, the average duration of a full-scale remedial action was 10 years; however, the EPA reports that it has reduced the average clean-up time to 8 years.' Removal actions are limited to a year. "OK--so there's CERCLA, there's SARA, there's the EPA. Are those the only abbreviations I need to remember?" I'm afraid not. Read on. A Brief Guide To Superfund-Speak (more details to follow) If you overhear someone talking about how the NCP requires the EPA to use the HRS to see if CERCLIS sites make the NPL (and to go after PRPs and make them pay for the RA), you have arrived in the world of Superfund. Now that you're here, it's a good idea to learn the language-- at least enough to get by. Here's a list of some of the most important terms (as you can see, they love abbreviations and acronyms in the world of Superfund!): EPA: The Environmental Protection Agency. For the most part (and for better or for worse), the folks at this beleaguered federal agency run the Superfund show. NCP: The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan. (Don't ask me why there's no 0, H, or S in the abbreviation.) This is the official document that tells the EPA how to put the law into practice. CERCLA: CERCLA is the official name for Superfund. The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. The law that started it all. 4 SARA: he sequel to CERCLA. Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. It reauthorir ed Superfund, made changes in the law that made it stronger, and gave the program more mo ey. Remova action: The more common kind of Superfund action. Usually an immediate response to an em rgency, like a chemical spill, a potential explosion, or a threat of groundwater contamin tion. Remedia action: The less common kind of Superfund action. Remedial actions are the big ones, me t to clean up the most dangerous sites for good. Remedial action can also refer to the phase of cleanup in which the actual cleaning takes place. Some imp rtant remedial action terms: P • SI: Preliminary assessment and site inspection. These are the first two phases, in wh ch the EPA checks out a site to see if it's dangerous enough to include on the Na ional Priority List (see below). S: Remedial investigation and feasibility study. If the EPA decides to clean up the site it figures out how to do it in these phases. RO I : Record of Decision. This is the official document that announces to the public ho the site will be cleaned up. It follows the feasibility study. RD : Remedial design and remedial action. This is the cleanup itself, from the desi n to the construction to the actual cleaning. CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Informatio System. A list of all the abandoned hazardous waste sites that the EPA considers for cleanup. NPL: The tional Priority List. EPA's "Most Wanted." These are the sites determined to be the most d erous in America--and the only ones that qualify for remedial actions. HRS: Haza F Ranking System. A scoring system that determines whether a CERCLIS site makes it on t. the NPL. ATSDR: Ag ncy for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. This is the agency in charge of health issues :t Superfund sites. It's not a part of EPA, but a division of the Centers for Disease Control. RPM: The R medial Project Manager is the EPA official who oversees a remedial action. 5 RP: Responsible Party. Anyone who can be held liable for the pollution at a site. Usually chemical or petroleum companies. (In EPA literature, you can expect to encounter the term that attorneys for industry prefer: PRP, or "Potentially Responsible Party.") CRP: Not to be confused with PRP! CRPs are Community Relations Plans. The EPA has to develop one at every remedial action site. TAG: Technical Assistance Grant. A community group at a remedial action site can apply for a TAG to hire an expert who can help interpret the technical aspects of the cleanup. TOSC: Technical Outreach Services for Communities. A new EPA program to supplement the TAG program: it offers access to a network of academic experts across the country. RCRA: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976. It tracks and regulates America's hazardous waste from generation to disposal, and it's supposed to make Superfund obsolete one of these days. Let's hope it works. 6 THE SUPERFUND PROCESS... AND ITS SUPERFLAWS The Powers That Be The EPA is in charge of administering and implementing Superfund, but other agencies also serve important functions in the program. The United States Coast Guard handles cleanups in coastal waters. Other agencies and departments, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Defense, are involved in cleanups involving federal facilities. The EPA also encourages states and tribal governments to participate in federal cleanup actions whenever possible. The EPA's program for administering Superfund is divided into ten regions (for contact information, see Appendix C.) Big c.eanup jobs involve a lot of people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Justice in Remediation: Tools for Community Empowerment Chihiro Tamefusa Pomona College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2016 Environmental Justice in Remediation: Tools for Community Empowerment Chihiro Tamefusa Pomona College Recommended Citation Tamefusa, Chihiro, "Environmental Justice in Remediation: Tools for Community Empowerment" (2016). Pomona Senior Theses. Paper 144. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/144 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Environmental Justice in Remediation: Tools for Community Empowerment Chihiro Tamefusa In partial fulfillment of a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Environmental Analysis 2015-2016 academic year Pomona College, Claremont, California Readers: Dr. Char Miller Dr. Richard Worthington Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Char Miller and Professor Rick Worthington for all of their support. They have guided me throughout the whole process and have encouraged me when I was having difficult times. I would also like to thank Aaron Katzenstein from the South Coast Air Quality Management District for introducing me to so many people whom I got to interview for my research. This research would not have been possible without the support from my interview participants. I would like to thank Pierre Sycip and Ian MacMillan from AQMD, Sarah Cromie from the Department of Toxic Substances Control, Robert Cabrales from Communities for a Better Environment, Mark Lopez from East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice, and Jane Williams from California Communities Against Toxics.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Inland Empire: a Case Study in Cross-Issue Grantmaking
    Inside the Inland Empire: A Case Study in Cross-Issue Grantmaking Neighborhood Funders Group Working Group on Labor and Community Partnerships Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrant Rights Inland Empire Site Visit, September 13-14, 2011 9/13 6:00pm – 8:00pm Over dinner – welcome & 1.5 hour panel (overview) 9/14 8:00am Breakfast is served 8:30am – 9:30am Over breakfast 1 hour panel (workforce) 9:45am – 12:00pm Bus tour 2.25 hours 12:00pm - 12:30pm Break 12:30pm – 1:30pm Over lunch 1 hour panel (economic justice) 1:30pm – 2:15pm Break 2:15pm – 3:45pm 1.25 hour panel (civic participation) 3:45pm – 4:00pm Break 4:00pm – 5:00pm Funder-only Debrief 5:00pm End Detailed Schedule 9/13, 6:00pm Welcome and Introduction by Henry Allen , Executive Director, Discount Foundation, GCIR board member and former co-chair of the Working Group Understanding the Inland Empire: An Overview of its Economy, Environment, Politics and Demographics Moderated by Margarita Luna , Program Manager, California Endowment Juan De Lara is an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern California. Juan received his PhD in geography from UC Berkeley. His research interests include: the geographies of global commodity distribution, emerging scales of metropolitan and regional growth, the role that labor and community organizations play in the social production of space, urban political ecology - especially as it relates to environmental justice and the green economy movement, and the politics of race and representation in California's rapidly expanding inland counties. Penny Newman , the Executive Director for the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ), a non-profit organization working on environmental justice issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Temptation
    TOXIC TEMPTATION The Revolving Door, Bureaucratic Inertia and the Disappointment of the EPA Superfund Program Eric J. Greenberg THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1910 K Street N.W., Suite 802 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 223-0299 TOXIC TEMPTATION The Revolving Door, Bureaucratic Inertia and the Disappointment of the EPA Superfund Program Eric J. Greenberg THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1910 K Street N.W., Suite 802 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 223-0299 "Let the public service be a proud and lively career. And let every man and woman who works in any area of our national government, in any branch, at any level, be able to say with pride and with honor in future years: 'I served the United States government in that hour of our nation's need.'" - John F. Kennedy "To the extent that the public believes that people who move in and out of government are doing so in order to advance their own economic interest as opposed to representing the public interest when they are in government, that's not a good thing for society." -- William D. Ruckelshaus, EPA's first and fifth Administrator, 1991 "I've had it with patriotism: I'm into greed now." - Anne Gorsuch Burford, EPA Administrator, 1981-1983, to Regardie's Magazine, August 1984 The Center for Public Integrity is an independent nonprofit organization that examines public service and ethics-related issues. The Center's Reports combine the substantive study of government with in-depth journalism. The Center is funded by foundations, corporations, labor unions, individuals and revenue from news organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions?
    Fordham Law Review Volume 79 Issue 6 Article 2 November 2011 Who's In Charge? Does the President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions? Robert V. Percival Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert V. Percival, Who's In Charge? Does the President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions? , 79 Fordham L. Rev. 2487 (2011). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol79/iss6/2 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHO’S IN CHARGE? DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE DIRECTIVE AUTHORITY OVER AGENCY REGULATORY DECISIONS? Robert V. Percival* Most regulatory statutes specify that agency heads rather than the President shall make regulatory decisions .1 Yet for more than four decades every President has established some program to require pre-decisional review and clearance of agency regulatory decisions, usually conducted by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).2 On January 18, 2011, President Barack Obama joined his seven predecessors in expressly endorsing regulatory review when he signed Executive Order 13,563.3 President Obama’s regulatory review program generally emulates those of his two most recent predecessors, relying on OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to review only the most significant agency rulemaking actions.4 Although this form of presidential oversight of rulemaking is now well established, an important, unresolved question is whether the President has the authority to dictate the substance of regulatory decisions entrusted by statute to agency heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstructing the Administrative State: Chevron Debates and the Transformation of Constitutional Politics
    DECONSTRUCTING THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE: CHEVRON DEBATES AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS CRAIG GREEN* ABSTRACT This Article contrasts Reagan-era conservative support for Chevron U.S.A. v. NRDC with conservative opposition to Chevron deference today. That dramatic shift offers important context for understanding how future attacks on the administrative state will develop. Newly collected historical evidence shows a sharp pivot after President Obama’s reelection, and conservative opposition to Chevron deference has become stronger ever since. The sudden emergence of anti-Chevron critiques, along with their continued growth during a Republican presidency, suggests that such arguments will increase in power and popularity for many years to come. Although critiques of Chevron invoke timeless rhetoric about constitutional structure, those critiques began at a very specific moment, and that historical coincidence fuels existing skepticism about such arguments’ substantive merit. This Article analyzes institutional questions surrounding Chevron with deliberate separation from modern politics. Regardless of one’s substantive opinions about President Trump, federal regulation, or administrative deference, this Article identifies extraordinary costs to the legal system of overruling Chevron through mechanisms of constitutional law. * Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law; Ph.D., Princeton University; J.D., Yale Law School. Many thanks for comments from participants at the Federal Administrative Law Judges Conference and the Philadelphia Law Department’s Annual Conference. Thanks also for individual suggestions from Kent Barnett, Jane Baron, Pamela Bookman, Heather Elliott, Kellen Funk, Tara Leigh Grove, Joseph Hall, Jonathan Lipson, Jane Manners, Gillian Metzger, Henry Monaghan, Andrea Monroe, Lauren Ouziel, Rachel Rebouché, Dan Rodgers, and Neil Siegel.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106Th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 146 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2000 No. 137 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. ceedings and announces to the House H.R. 2780. An act to authorize the Attorney The Chaplain, the Reverend Daniel P. his approval thereof. General to provide grants for organizations Coughlin, offered the following prayer: Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- to find missing adults. God of all grace, be with us now and nal stands approved. H.R. 4404. An act to permit the payment of until the end. f medical expenses incurred by the United You know each of the Members of States Park Police in the performance of this House. You have given each dif- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE duty to be made directly by the National ferent gifts; that together they may The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman Park Service, to allow for waiver and indem- achieve Your purpose and bring about from Wisconsin (Mr. SENSENBRENNER) nification in mutual law enforcement agree- liberty and justice for all. come forward and lead the House in the ments between the National Park Service You have called them forth from dif- Pledge of Allegiance. and a State or political subdivision when re- ferent places and assembled them in Mr. SENSENBRENNER led the quired by State law, and for other purposes. this Chamber to serve this great Na- Pledge of Allegiance as follows: H.R. 4957. An act to amend the Omnibus tion and shape its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating the Cleanup of Toxic Groundwater Contamination: Strategy and Legitimacy
    Volume 28 Issue 1 Environmental Dispute Resolutions Winter 1988 Negotiating the Cleanup of Toxic Groundwater Contamination: Strategy and Legitimacy Lloyd Burton Recommended Citation Lloyd Burton, Negotiating the Cleanup of Toxic Groundwater Contamination: Strategy and Legitimacy, 28 Nat. Resources J. 105 (1988). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol28/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. LLOYD BURTON* Negotiating the Cleanup of Toxic Groundwater Contamination: Strategy and Legitimacy INTRODUCTION Toxic pollution of the nation's drinking water supplies has now become a familiar public policy issue. Ongoing studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and various state governments are finding that the extent and severity of groundwater contamination is much greater than had been formerly assumed, both from "non-point sources" such as agricultural run-off and identifiable "point sources" such as manufac- turing sites and underground storage tanks. Several federal statutes have been brought into play in an effort to control the problem, with mixed results. Different statutes delegate imple- mentation authority to different local, state, and federal agencies, creating substantial jurisdictional overlap in some areas, disturbing gaps in others, and a considerable amount of confusion overall. Federal statutes include the Clean Water Act,' Safe Drinking Water Act,2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,3 and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com- pensation, and Liability Act (the "Superfund" legislation).
    [Show full text]
  • High Country News Vol. 16.3, Feb. 20, 1984
    \I The EPA's SU/lerlund wbistleblower How Hugh Kaufmanmoves theball . ....--~-"~--- , ____ -/)by Ed Marston Reagan lied about hazardous ~waste~ telling the public a great deal about- How much yardage? "We may be -,p~li.fY:.in.his- most rece'm State of the what he knows of how .the system on our own twenty. But twelve years . Back 1U 1981, the __Reag an Union address; he talks about operates, and with displaying pride in . ago, we weren't even in the stadium. Admiaistrarten asSigned investigators "criminal activity" in the EPA under his accomplishments. We weren't even suited up," ~-to- 'shadow Hugh Kaufman, an Anne Gorsuch Burford;. he gleefully "They could put me in a box with a Kaufman was among the first to engineer in the Hazardous Waste recounts, how hl~ex.-~oss, Rita telephone and zero responsibility, and suit up, joining the new EPA in 1971 section of the EPA. In the course of . Lavelle, ended up with a Jail sentence; l-would still move the ball. They can't after .the Air Force. He enjoyed the that surveillance, the investigators and he spec~lates that the team of stop me because I' have too much Nixon yeats, when the EPA was snapped a picture of Kaufman EPA ass as sins (Burford, James access to themedia and too good a headed fot the first rime by William slipping into a motel room with a Sanderson, James. Wall) from Colo- track record for telling the truth." Ruckleshaus, '. woman. The woman was Kaufman's rado were dispatched by Reagan K f II h' "Nixon, far and away, was the best wife.
    [Show full text]
  • An Indians – Project on the Judiciary
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Native American Rights Fund ATTORNEYS John E. Echohawk Richard A. Guest 1514 P Street, NW (Rear), Suite D, Washington, D.C. 20005 Joel W. Williams LITIGATION MANAGEMENT (202) 785-4166 • FAX (202) 822-0068 COMMITTEE www.narf.org BOULDER OFFICE K. Jerome Gottschalk 1506 Broadway St. Natalie A. Landreth Boulder, CO 80302-6296 Melody L. McCoy Nae Ph. (303) 447-8760 ATTORNEYS 1506 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80302-6296 • FAX (303) 443-7776 Matthew L. Campbell K. Jerome Gottschalk (303) 447-8760 • FAX (303) 443-7776 ANCHORAGE OFFICE th David L. Gover 745 W. 4 Avenue, Ste. 502 Melody L. McCoy Anchorage, AK 99501-1736 Steven C. Moore Susan Y. Noe Ph. (907) 276-0680 Brett Lee Shelton March 16, 2017 FAX (907) 276-2466 Donald R. Wharton Heather D. Whiteman Runs Him ATTORNEYS Heather R. Kendall-Miller CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Natalie A. Landreth Michael Kennedy Erin C. Dougherty Matthew L. Newman DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPEMENT MEMORANDUM Don Ragona CORPORATE SECRETARY Ray Ramirez TO: Tribal Leaders and Tribal Attorneys National Congress of American Indians – Project on the Judiciary FROM: Richard Guest, Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund RE: The Nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court of the United States – An Indian Law Perspective On Monday, March 20, 2017, the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary will begin confirmation hearings for Judge Neil Gorsuch to serve as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. President Trump announced his nomination of Judge Gorsuch on January 31, 2017, as his pick to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
    [Show full text]
  • The EPA at Fifty Symposium: Keynote Address
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 70 Issue 4 Article 5 2020 The EPA at Fifty Symposium: Keynote Address Andrew Wheeler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrew Wheeler, The EPA at Fifty Symposium: Keynote Address, 70 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 883 (2020) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol70/iss4/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Western Reserve Law Review·Volume 70·Issue 4·2020 The EPA at Fifty Symposium: Keynote Address Andrew Wheeler† Good afternoon, it is a pleasure to be with you today. Thank you to Professor Jonathan Adler for the introduction. We have known each other for at least twenty years. I also want to thank the University for hosting me. It is great to be back at Case Western. I graduated with my undergraduate degree here in 1987. I almost went to law school here. As I was making my decision, my car was stolen for the second time from just outside my dorm. The campus has changed a lot since the 1980s; it is a lot safer. But when it was stolen for the second time, I decided I wanted to be in a different city, and I went to Washington University in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power
    Order Code RL31836 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power April 2, 2003 Louis Fisher Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power Summary When conducting investigations of the executive branch, congressional committees and Members of Congress generally receive the information required for legislative needs. If agencies fail to cooperate or the President invokes executive privilege, Congress can turn to a number of legislative powers that are likely to compel compliance. The two techniques described in this report are the issuance of subpoenas and the holding of executive officials in contempt. These techniques usually lead to an accommodation that meets the needs of both branches. Litigation is used at times, but federal judges generally encourage congressional and executive parties to settle their differences out of court. The specific examples in this report explain how information disputes arise and how they are resolved. For legal analysis see CRS Report 95-464A, Investigative Oversight: An Introduction to the Law, Practice, and Procedure of Congressional Inquiry, by Morton Rosenberg, and CRS Report RS30319, Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice and Recent Developments, by Morton Rosenberg. A number of legislative tools, including subpoenas and contempt citations, are covered in CRS Report RL30966,
    [Show full text]
  • The US Environmental Protection Agency
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A Historical Perspective on Its Role in Environmental Protection Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Xin Liu München 2010 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Hochgeschwender Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Christof Mauch Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 07.07.2010 Liu iii Table of Contents Lists of Tables…………………………………..………………………………………………….vi Lists of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………vii Lists of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………...viii 1. Introduction…………………………………………………….………………………....1 1.1. Environmental Protection: Preconditions, Push-Factor and Value Change……......…1 1.2. Development of Federal Environmental Protection from the Nixon to the Clinton Administration………………………………………………………………………...5 1.3. Description of this Study……………………………………………………………...8 1.3.1. Why does this Study focus on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency? ….8 1.3.2. Why does this Study focus on the Era from 1970 to 2000? …………………...9 1.3.3. Subject, Method and Procedures……………………………………………...11 2. The EPA Context: Origins, Principles and Legacies………………………………….20 2.1. The Context of the EPA’s Organization……………………………………………..20 2.1.1. The EPA’s Goals, Responsibilities and Functions……………………………22 2.1.2. Organizational Structure……………………………………………………....23 2.1.3. Environmental Regulation Process……………………………………………32 2.2. Political Involvement in the EPA’s Decision-making and Development…………...34 2.2.1. The President, his Administration, and the EPA……………………………...34 2.2.2. Congress and the EPA………………………………………………………...38 2.2.3. Courts………………………………………………………………………….41 2.2.4. Interest Groups………………………………………………………………...47 3. The Historical Context: Shaping the EPA, and its Changing Roles………………….61 3.1. The EPA under the Nixon-Ford Administration…..………………………………... 62 Liu iv 3.1.1. Environmental Understanding from President Nixon………………………...62 3.1.2.
    [Show full text]