DOCSLIB.ORG

Special Issue 2019, Vol 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Special Issue 2019, Vol 7 JOURNAL of DIALOGUE JOURNAL STUDIES of DIALOGUE STUDIES DIALOGUE Special Issue Critical Dialogues: Dialogue and Conflict Resolution Guest Editors: Dr Mustafa Demir Prof Deborah Dunn Prof Simon Keyes Prof Ian Linden Prof Oliver Ramsbotham Dr Oemer Shener Prof Paul Weller 2019 INSTITUTE for Volume 7 DIALOGUE STUDIES Journal of Dialogue Studies Volume 7 2019 Special Issue Critical Dialogues: Dialogue and Conflict Resolution Guest Editors: Dr Mustafa Demir Prof Deborah Dunn Prof Simon Keyes Prof Ian Linden Prof Oliver Ramsbotham Dr Oemer Shener Prof Paul Weller Editorial Team Academic Editor: Prof Paul Weller - Executive Editor: Ozcan Keles Assistant Editors: Dr Mustafa Cakmak, Dr Mustafa Demir, Dr Oemer Shener, Frances Sleap Editorial Board Prof Ronald Arnett Prof Eddie Halpin Prof Ali Paya Duquesne University Leeds Beckett University The Islamic College Prof Michael Barnes Dr Carool Kersten Dr Fabio Petito University of Roehampton London Kings College London University of Sussex Prof Joseph Camilleri Prof Simon Keyes Prof Simon Robinson La Trobe University University of Winchester Leeds Beckett University Prof Donal Carbaugh Prof Ian Linden Dr Erkan Toguslu University of Massachusetts Amherst St. Mary’s University University of KU Leuven Twickenham London Prof Tony Evans Dr Johnston McMaster Prof Pnina Werbner Winchester University Trinity College Dublin Keele University Dr Cem Erbil Prof Karim Murji Dr Nicholas Wood Dialogue Society University of West London University of Oxford Prof Max Farrar Prof Alpaslan Ozerdem Leeds Beckett University George Mason University --------------------------------- The Editors appreciate comments and feedback from readers. They also value any help in increasing circulation in order to fulfil the Journal’s objective, which is to bring together a body of original scholarship on the theory and practice of dialogue that can be critically appraised and discussed. Aim and Scope The Journal of Dialogue Studies is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed academic journal published once a year. Its aim is to study the theory and practice of dialogue, understood provisionally as: meaningful interaction and exchange between people (often of different social, cultural, political, religious or professional groups) who come together through various kinds of conversations or activities with a view to increased understanding. The Journal is published by the Institute for Dialogue Studies, the academic platform of the Dialogue Society. Submission and Editorial Correspondence Manuscripts submitted to the Journal for publication must be original, meet the standards and conventions of scholarly publication, and must not be simultaneously under consideration by another journal. Manuscripts should be presented in the form and style set out in the Journal’s Style Guide. For further information and Style Guide please visit www.dialoguestudies.org. To get in touch please email [email protected]. Subscription The Journal of Dialogue Studies is published once a year. Annual subscription – Institutions: £15 + p&p; Individuals: £10 + p&p; Students/Concessions: £7.5 + p&p. For further information or to subscribe please email [email protected]. Except where otherwise noted, the authors of papers and reviews alone are responsible for the opinions expressed therein. The Journal of Dialogue Studies is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed academic journal published once a year INSTITUTE by the Institute of Dialogue Studies, a subsidiary body for DIALOGUE of the Dialogue Society, which undertakes the Society’s STUDIES academic work including research, academic workshops and publications. The Dialogue Society is a registered charity, established in London in 1999, with the aim of advancing social cohesion CENTRE by connecting communities, empowering people to engage for COMMUNITY and contributing to the development of ideas on dialogue. ENGAGEMENT It operates nation-wide with regional branches across the UK. Through discussion forums, courses, capacity building publications and outreach it enables people to venture across boundaries of religion, culture and social class. It provides a platform where people can meet to share narratives and CENTRE for perspectives, discover the values they have in common and be POLICY at ease with their differences. OUTREACH CONNECTING COMMUNITIES EMPOWERING ENGAGEMENT INSPIRING IDEAS Journal of Dialogue Studies 2019 Volume 7 DIALOGUE First published in Great Britain 2019 SOCIETY © Dialogue Society 2019 LONDON 1999 All rights reserved. Except for downloading and storing this publication from the Dialogue Society website for personal use. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means or stored or made Registered Charity available on any information storage and retrieval system No: 1117039 without prior written permission from the publisher. www.DialogueSociety.org ISSN 2054-3123 Contents Editorial Introduction ......................................................................... 5 Dialogue in a Rapidly Changing World: Practitioner Assessments of the Potency of Intercultural Dialogue for Improving Social Cohesion Mike Hardy and Serena Hussain ........................................................... 9 Photovoice: A Focus on Dialogue, Young People, Peace and Change Michael Ogunnusi .............................................................................. 27 Dialogue and the Cultural Other in Conflict Situations: An Augmented Understanding Michael Atkinson................................................................................ 43 Citizen Apologies and Forgiveness as Diplomatic Gestures of Peace Lisa Gibson ........................................................................................ 59 Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Truth and Method Revisited: On the Very Idea of a Fusion of Horizons in Intense, Asymmetric and Intractable Conflicts Oliver Ramsbotham ............................................................................ 73 ‘Culture of Dialogue’ as a Decolonial Peace-Building Tool: The Case of Colombia Lucía Mesa-Vélez ................................................................................ 93 Dialogue and Environmental Education: Conflicts Between Marine Conservation and Fishing Rafael Monteiro ................................................................................ 139 Children in the Fog of War: Responses to Parental Alienation Owen Logan..................................................................................... 163 The ‘Prevent Duty’ (Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015) and its Impact on English Secondary Schools: A View from Leadership Adam Peter Lang .............................................................................. 185 Aspects of Effective Dialogic Interventions D. Beth Macy ................................................................................... 201 Dialogue and Peacebuilding in Colombia: A Dialogic and a Transformative Relationship Angela Marcela Olarte Delgado ......................................................... 219 Prophecies of Self-Determination and the Authority of the Word: The Era of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance David Goldberg ................................................................................ 235 How Might Lamentations Be Read in the Light of Applying Winnicott’s Notion of a ‘Holding Environment’ to Reconcile the Internal Conflict of the Absent Comforter? Preston Evangelou ............................................................................. 261 Understanding the psychological mechanisms that constrain the transfer of dialogue effects Katherine O’Lone ………………………………………………… . 277 Editorial Introduction We are delighted to present a special issue of The Journal of Dialogue Studies to our readers. This special issue addresses dialogue as a means of conflict resolution under the title of ‘Critical Dialogues: Dialogue and Conflict Resolution.’ As a tool of conflict resolution, dialogue can take on many different shapes and can be moulded to respond to each conflict. In some cases, it becomes a tent that gives shelter to both sides, creating an environment of peace and security; in some other cases, it becomes a ship that saves the parties from the results of the conflict. In all these shapes and forms, dialogue constructs an aura facilitating parties to settle their incompatible differences. In this issue we have 15 papers critically addressing the role of dialogue/s in resolution of different types/forms of conflicts, from military to inner (psychological and psychosocial) conflicts of individuals. This special issue highlights four themes related to the concept of dialogue. These are: 1. Intercultural Dialogue and Conflict 2. Dialogue, Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding 3. Dialogue, Conflict and Education 4. Dialogue and Conflict in a Changing World. In Part I we have four papers addressing the theme of Intercultural Dialogue and Conflict. Mike Hardy and Serena Hussain’s paper focuses on Intercultural Dialogue (ICD) in relation to practitioners’ understanding of the concept. The paper, based on structured interviews conducted with 52 delegates at the World Forum on Intercultural Dialogue held in Baku in 2015, critically examines the main concern of the critics whether ‘ICD contributes towards unequal platforms for exchange between minorities and the majority group and can reinforce exclusion.’ Michael Ogunnisi’s paper is an attempt to find a solution to violence in dialogic encounters of young people. He
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of the Trade Unions
    Recovering from December 2019 – the role of the trade unions Other parts of this report consider policy, media coverage and public opinion nationally and in specific locations where Labour lost seats. The purpose of this submission is not to analyse the cause(s) of the 2019 general election result, but to consider that result in a broader historical context and the role of the trade union movement in working with the Party to achieve a different result next time. The most eye-catching losses in 2019 were the so-called ‘Red Wall’ seats. There are 13 ‘Red Wall’ seats that were lost for the first time in recent history in 2019: • Ashfield (mining) • Bassetlaw (mining) • Bishop Auckland (mining nearby; + Manufacturing, including food processing and packaging, public sector employment, retail and agriculture ) • Blyth Valley (coastal, mining) • Don Valley (steel, mining) • Heywood and Middleton (offices and retail) • Leigh (high street decline, mining in Tyldesley) • North West Durham (steel and mining) • Redcar (steel, coastal town) • Sedgfield (mining) • Wakefield (mining) • West Bromwich East (industrial decline) • Workington (coastal town, mining, steel, vehicle manufacturing, significant nuclear work due to proximity to Sellafield). Of these Heywood & Middleton and Leigh are in the metropolitan area of Greater Manchester, but the rest are towns. Three of them are coastal, all of them have suffered as a result of deindustrialisation, and the majority of them were mostly profoundly affected by the decline of the coal and steel or manufacturing industries. Any analysis of Labour’s 2019 defeat that does not take into account the disastrous loss of support in Scotland after the 2014 Independence referendum would be incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP ANDREW MARR SHOW, 16TH FEBRUARY, 2020 REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP Shadow Business Secr
    1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP ANDREW MARR SHOW, 16TH FEBRUARY, 2020 REBECCA LONG-BAILEY, MP Shadow Business Secretary AM: Rebecca Long-Bailey is the Left’s chosen candidate to be Labour’s next Leader. Her campaign is confident she can overtake the current front runner, Sir Keir Starmer, and therefore one day become our Prime Minister. And she is my final guest this morning. Welcome Rebecca Long Bailey. RLB: Morning, Andrew AM: Now I know you don’t like being described as the continuity Corbyn candidate, but Jeremy Corbyn [indistinguishable] only last month at a meeting said this: “It’s an absolute pleasure to be here alongside Becky Long Bailey, our candidate for Leader.” Was that unhelpful? RLB: Not unhelpful. I mean Jeremy and myself are friends, but it’s quite disrespectful sometimes when I’m termed the ‘continuity’ candidate. I’ve always been strong to my principles; everybody knows what I believe in and I’ll never deviate from that, but I’m very much my own person and to suggest I’m a continuation of any individual is quite disrespectable- disrespectful, not least because I’m a woman, quite frankly. AM: It may not be about gender but about politics, because by ‘our candidate’ did he not mean that you were the candidate of the Socialist Campaign Group which includes - RLB: Well, I am AM: Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, Diane Abbott and you and Richard Burgon. RLB: I am the candidate of the Socialist Campaign Group, but I’m also the candidate of various trade unions and indeed a number of constituency parties who’ve nominated me.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party General Election 2017 Report Labour Party General Election 2017 Report
    FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT Page 7 Contents 1. Introduction from Jeremy Corbyn 07 2. General Election 2017: Results 11 3. General Election 2017: Labour’s message and campaign strategy 15 3.1 Campaign Strategy and Key Messages 16 3.2 Supporting the Ground Campaign 20 3.3 Campaigning with Women 21 3.4 Campaigning with Faith, Ethnic Minority Communities 22 3.5 Campaigning with Youth, First-time Voters and Students 23 3.6 Campaigning with Trade Unions and Affiliates 25 4. General Election 2017: the campaign 27 4.1 Manifesto and campaign documents 28 4.2 Leader’s Tour 30 4.3 Deputy Leader’s Tour 32 4.4 Party Election Broadcasts 34 4.5 Briefing and Information 36 4.6 Responding to Our Opponents 38 4.7 Press and Broadcasting 40 4.8 Digital 43 4.9 New Campaign Technology 46 4.10 Development and Fundraising 48 4.11 Nations and Regions Overview 49 4.12 Scotland 50 4.13 Wales 52 4.14 Regional Directors Reports 54 4.15 Events 64 4.16 Key Campaigners Unit 65 4.17 Endorsers 67 4.18 Constitutional and Legal services 68 5. Labour candidates 69 General Election 2017 Report Page 9 1. INTRODUCTION 2017 General Election Report Page 10 1. INTRODUCTION Foreword I’d like to thank all the candidates, party members, trade unions and supporters who worked so hard to achieve the result we did. The Conservatives called the snap election in order to increase their mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • New MP Briefing: Education the Vuelio Political Team Have Put Together a Briefing on First Time Mps with a Background in Educati
    New MP Briefing: Education The Vuelio political team have put together a briefing on first time MPs with a background in education. Robin Millar Robin Millar was elected as the Conservative MP for Aberconwy in December 2019 with a majority of 2,034. Millar's professional career began in engineering, allowing him to work across the UK, Russia and America. After leaving engineering, he became a management consultant and businessman, focused on public sector reform and government. Prior to being elected, Millar was a Conservative Councillor in Suffolk. He is the former Deputy leader of Forest Heath Council and was a member of the Suffolk County Council's Cabinet until 2018. During this time, he started an assisted reading programme in local- schools and is the co-founder of a small charity investing in young people. Millar has said he will move to Aberconwy following the election result. During his campaign he highlighted key policy issues as: communities, climate change, poverty, and Brexit. Beth Winter Beth Winter was elected as the Labour MP for Cynon Valley in December 2019 with a majority of 8,822. Winter was born and raised in Cynon Valley, where she still lives with her husband and children. Prior to her election to Parliament, she worked as a communications officer for the University and College Union Wales. She is committed to the area and has served in community groups working with young people. Caroline Ansell Caroline Ansell is the Conservative MP for Eastbourne who was elected in 2019 with a majority of 4,331. She was also previously the MP for Eastbourne from 2015 to 2017 beating Stephen Lloyd, the Lib Dem.
    [Show full text]
  • Proxy Voting May Also Be in the Hon
    913 Points of Order 13 SEPTEMBER 2018 914 Mr Speaker: It is possible that that would result. It Proxy Voting may also be in the hon. Gentleman’s mind in making that perfectly reasonable suggestion that if there were 1.13 pm such a regular opportunity, it would give him the chance to show what a thoroughly agreeable fellow he can be. The Leader of the House of Commons (Andrea Leadsom): [Interruption.] I think we will leave it there for today. I I beg to move, am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his characteristic That this House has considered proxy voting in the House of ingenuity and to colleagues for their points of order. Commons. Today’simportant debate has been eagerly anticipated by a number of Members across the House. It was, of course, scheduled for before the summer recess, but it was right that a statement on a matter of national security took precedence on that day. I am pleased, however, that we are able to hear the views of the House today, and consider the many issues surrounding the matter. I have made my personal commitment clear—I want a House of Commons suited to our times. I pay tribute to all MPs who have helped to progress this important issue. Members of all parties have shown true commitment to making positive changes in Parliament. In particular, the right hon. and learned Member for Camberwell and Peckham (Ms Harman) and my right hon. Friend the Member for Basingstoke (Mrs Miller) are vocal advocates of this matter. I also thank my hon.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Thursday Volume 635 1 February 2018 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 1 February 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 953 1 FEBRUARY 2018 954 Mr Walker: The Government have been talking to a House of Commons wide range of industry groups and representative bodies of business, and we recognise that there are benefits in some areas of maintaining regulatory alignment and Thursday 1 February 2018 ensuring that we have the most frictionless access to European markets. Of course we are entering the The House met at half-past Nine o’clock negotiations on the future partnership, and we want to take the best opportunities to trade with Europe and the wider world. PRAYERS Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): Is it true that Michel Barnier has basically offered us the Canada [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] model, agreement on which could be reached this year, thus negating the need for any transition period? Mr Walker: The Government’s policy is that we are Oral Answers to Questions pursuing a bespoke trade agreement, not an off-the-shelf model. We believe that it will be in the interests of both sides in this negotiation to secure an implementation period. EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab): The European The Secretary of State was asked— Union has clearly and firmly set out its views on the options for these negotiations. Ministers so far have Regulatory Equivalence signally failed to provide any coherent response because they cannot agree among one another, and the Minister’s 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Cost of a Labour Government
    THE REAL COST OF A LABOUR GOVERNMENT Conservative Research Department 10 November 2019 1 CONTENTS A FOREWORD FROM SAJID JAVID – CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 METHODOLOGY 5 SCORECARD 6 PREVIOUS LABOUR MANIFESTO SPENDING 9 NEW SPENDING 10 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport 11 Ministry of Defence 12 Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 12 Department for Education 16 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 18 Department for Health and Social Care 19 Home Office 22 Ministry of Justice 22 Department for Transport 24 HM Treasury 25 Department for Work and Pensions 26 ANNEX 1: Additional Labour spending commitments 28 ANNEX 2: Labour’s 2017 Manifesto 30 A FOREWORD FROM SAJID JAVID – CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER When we first came into government, the economy was on the brink. Spending was out of control. Public finances were a mess. And people were struggling to find jobs. In fact, Labour summed it all up in a note they left for us – ‘I’m afraid there is no money’. Since then we’ve had some tough times. But thanks to the hard work of the British people, we’ve cleaned up Labour’s mess – and together we’ve put the economy back on track. We brought our public finances under control. We helped 3.6 million more people into work. We cut taxes for hardworking people. And our economy has grown every year we’ve been in government. So we can afford to invest a little more in the country’s priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Interview: James Schneider
    James Schneider Co-founder of Momentum Spokesperson & Head of Strategic Communications, Office of the Leader of the Opposition. October 2016 – January 2020 11 January 2021 The referendum UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE): How engaged was Momentum with the referendum campaign in 2016? James Schneider (JS): Initially, we didn’t have a position on the referendum and weren’t doing anything, but myself and some others thought that was a completely unsustainable position. We suspected that the overwhelming bulk of our members and supporters would want us to campaign for Remain. So, we conducted an internal poll and found that this was the case, with around 80% wanting us to campaign for Remain, and used that as our reasoning with the Steering Committee to shift into campaigning for Remain. Then, very quickly, we began working with Another Europe is Possible, who moved into Momentum’s offices. We worked together closely on canvassing, we did some stunts, and had some involvement with the disastrous ‘Battle of the Thames’. I wasn’t on a boat. I was on a bridge, but others were on boats. It was quite a bad moment. When there’s Bob Geldof giving two fingers to fishermen, it’’s like that Mitchell and Webb sketch where they ask: ‘Are we the baddies?’ Is Bob Geldof and a bunch of poshos on his big boat, telling fishermen to get fucked, really good? No, probably not. It was quite a bad day and felt like we were losing. Then the next day Jo Cox was killed. Page 1/33 UKICE: Did you have any other reservations about the way Labour approached the whole referendum campaign? JS: I thought the main Labour campaign – the Alan Johnson, Hilary Benn one – was very limp, and quite establishment, and, therefore not terribly effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Maitland View
    TitleMaitland View Today, we'll see Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn swap what would be expected to be their normal campaign itineraries. The Prime Minister is touring North East, where she will accuse the Labour Party of abandoning the patriotic working class. It is expected she will deliver the speech, in a similar fashion to her other general election addresses, standing in front of a bank of suited Conservative candidates and quarantined from any members of the What have we learnt this week? general public. The Conservative are yet to hit their first Jeremy Corbyn, meanwhile, will pitch his real problem of this campaign. They foreign policy credentials at Chatham glided through the election spending House, taking on critics of his approach to scandal and remain high in the polls. All intervention and the use of nuclear this being equal, Theresa May will weapons. He will argue that he is not a returned to number 10 with an enormous pacifist and would support military action if majority. it has been sanctioned by the UN and is in accordance with international law, despite Labour, by accident or design, have got a having previously approved such action. In lot of coverage after their manifesto leak. his speech this morning, Corbyn will also The policies are popular, the leader distance himself from Donald Trump in a unpopular, and the polls stubborn. The thinly veiled jab to the Prime Minister's party divided, MPs bracing for defeat and recent visit to the US, saying "Pandering to government seeming a long way away. an erratic Trump administration will not deliver stability … So no more hand-holding Meanwhile the Liberal Democrats have with Donald Trump; a Labour government largely failed to achieve cut through, a will conduct a robust and independent surge in policies, announcements and foreign policy made in London." busy work, but little shift in the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Labour Party a Cicero Group Overview
    Inside the Labour party A Cicero Group overview APRIL 2018 1 Foreword The election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour priorities of the party leadership. We profile some of the Party in 2015 was a momentous moment in British most high profile and influential members of the ‘government politics. An unheralded left-wing backbencher for over in waiting’, followed by a focus on the increasingly 30 years, Corbyn suddenly found himself at the helm marginalised Deputy Leader of the party, Tom Watson (p14). of the official opposition in Parliament and the fastest growing party by membership in western Europe. Corbyn’s Affiliated trade unions (p15) are another vital component election signalled the start of a wider transformation in of the Labour Party, as the biggest source of funding the Labour Party. The last two and a half years have and a bedrock of support for Corbyn. In particular, seen a steady rise in the influence of the left over the Len McCluskey and Unite increasingly wield influence party’s major institutions from the Shadow Cabinet to the throughout the structures of the party. One illustration National Executive Committee, National Policy Forum of this is the recent appointment of close McCluskey and Party HQ, not to mention the membership base itself. ally Jennie Formby as General Secretary, heading up Labour HQ (p17). This appointment was challenged by This document is intended to provide an overview of each of Jon Lansman, founder of the grassroots pro-Corbyn the major pillars of the Labour Party, their level of influence movement Momentum, and this may reflect a new fault- over the direction of the party, where they stand on the line emerging on the left between the ‘machine politics’ left-right spectrum within the party, and their degree of of the unions and the ‘movement politics’ of Momentum.
    [Show full text]