ABSTRACT ZECK, ADRIAN MICHAEL. Examining Users' Preferences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ABSTRACT ZECK, ADRIAN MICHAEL. Examining Users' Preferences ABSTRACT ZECK, ADRIAN MICHAEL. Examining Users’ Preferences, Perceptions, and Attitudes on a Multi-Jurisdictional Rail-Trail. (Under the direction of Dr. Roger L. Moore.) Instances of trails managed by multiple governmental agencies (i.e., multi-jurisdictional trails) are becoming increasingly common. However, researchers have focused little attention on the users and use of these important recreation resources. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of a multi-jurisdictional trail near a growing metropolitan area by profiling the users and trail use, examining their choices, attitudes, and perceived benefits along the trail. The particular focus was determining the importance of various factors in users’ choices of which trail section(s) they use and determining users’ awareness of and attitudes toward the multi-jurisdictional nature of the study trail. A purposive sample of visitors to the multi-jurisdictional American Tobacco Trail near Durham, NC participated in an on-site and then a follow-up questionnaire to provide the study data. Study results revealed that multi-jurisdictional awareness and preferences differ somewhat by activity type. Specifically, runners have more concern than bicyclists and walkers for trail-wide consistency in terms of bathroom facilities and availability of drinking water. However, runners have less concern than bicyclists for consistency in terms of parking facilities and on- site information about the trail. These results should help inform the planning and management of such trail settings and, thereby, help increase the benefits they can provide. © Copyright 2012 by Adrian Michael Zeck All Rights Reserved Examining Users’ Preferences, Perceptions, and Attitudes on a Multi-Jurisdictional Rail- Trail. by Adrian Michael Zeck A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management Raleigh, North Carolina 2012 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ ______________________________ Roger L. Moore Aram Attarian Committee Chair ________________________________ Chris Siderelis ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my loving and supporting parents, Pam and Gerry Zeck. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Roger Moore for his help and assistance as my advisor for the past two years. iii BIOGRAPHY Adrian Zeck was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He received a bachelor of arts in history at the University of Florida then stayed in Gainesville, Florida and worked for the George A Smathers’ Libraries at the University of Florida. It was here that he became interested in working in the field of parks and recreation. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the managers and stakeholders of the American Tobacco Trail, including Tracy Burnett, Bill Bussey, Christina Sorensen, Chris Snow, and Rosetta Radtke. Special thanks are extended to my committee for all of their help and suggestions. Lastly, I would not have been able to do this study without the users of the American Tobacco Trail. Thank you to everyone I encountered for interrupting your trail visits (and in some cases letting me run alongside you) to gather my data. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................x INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 LITRATURE REVIEW ..............................................................................................8 Theoretical Framework ...........................................................................................8 Research on Trails and Trail Use .........................................................................12 Background ............................................................................................................13 Trail Research. ...................................................................................................14 User Studies. .......................................................................................................18 Trail Activity Differences. .................................................................................20 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................22 METHODS .................................................................................................................23 Study Site ................................................................................................................23 Trail Characteristics ..............................................................................................28 Procedures ..............................................................................................................31 Survey Instruments ................................................................................................34 Data Analysis ..........................................................................................................35 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................37 User Characteristics ..............................................................................................37 Trip Characteristics ...............................................................................................39 Users’ Trail Experiences .......................................................................................48 vi Users’ Perceptions and Attitudes about the American Tobacco Trail .............53 Study Research Question ......................................................................................64 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................70 Profile of Users’ Characteristics ...........................................................................71 Profile of Use on the ATT ......................................................................................72 Activities..............................................................................................................72 Distance Traveled to Access. .............................................................................73 Sections Used. .....................................................................................................74 Length of Stay. ...................................................................................................75 Perceived Benefits & Motivations. ...................................................................75 Users’ Multi-jurisdictional Awareness and Preferences ....................................76 Influence of Activity Differences on Preferences for Trail Use .........................78 Research Question .................................................................................................79 Summary. ............................................................................................................82 Strengths and Limitations .....................................................................................82 Management Implications .....................................................................................84 Further Research ...................................................................................................85 REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................87 APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................100 Appendix A: On-site questionnaire ....................................................................101 Appendix B: Follow-up Questionnaire ..............................................................104 Appendix C: Results Compared by Trail Activity ...........................................115 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Sections of the ATT ......................................................................................28 Table 2. Public Access Points for ATT ......................................................................33 Table 3. Respondents’ Age .........................................................................................37 Table 4. Respondents’ Gender ....................................................................................38 Table 5. Respondents’ Annual Household Income Level ..........................................38 Table 6. Respondents’ Highest Level of Education ....................................................38 Table 7. Respondents’ Race ........................................................................................39 Table 8. Origin Location that Respondents Traveled from to Access the ATT .........40 Table 9. How Respondents Travelled to the ATT ......................................................40 Table 10. Miles from Respondents’ Origin to Trail ...................................................40 Table 11. Minutes from Respondents’ Origin to Trail ...............................................40 Table 12. On-site Respondents’ Primary Trail Activity (from On-site Questionnaire) .......................................................................................41 Table 13.
Recommended publications
  • Apex Bicycle Plan
    APEX BICYCLE PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the local residents, community leaders, and government staff that participated in the development of this plan through meetings, workshops, comment forms, and plan review. Special thanks to those who participated as steering committee members, listed below. PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE The Steering Committee is made up of local residents, government staff, and community leaders. Linda Barrett WakeMed Apex Paul Black Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (formerly) David Cole Apex resident Tom Colwell Apex Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Advisory Commission Shannon Cox Apex Planning Russell Dalton Apex Public Works & Transportation Jennifer Delcourt Active Routes to School Shannon Flaherty Apex Chamber of Commerce Joanna Helms Apex Economic Development Bill Jensen Apex Town Council David Keilson NCDOT Division 5 Margot Knepp Apex resident Jose Martinez Apex Public Works & Transportation Lance Olive Mayor of Apex Angela Reincke Apex Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources Jenna Shouse Apex Planning Reggie Skinner Apex Planning Board Stephen Sposato Wake County Public Schools Ann Stephens Apex Police Department John Vine-Hodge NCDOT Division of Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Division of Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Prepared for the Town of Apex, North Carolina Project Contact: Shannon Cox, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner, Town of Apex | [email protected] PO Box 250, Apex, NC 27502 | Phone 919-249-3505 | www.apexnc.org This project was made possible with a matching grant from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation (DBPT). Prepared by Alta Planning + Design, in coordination with Kimley-Horn, Inc. Adopted by the Town of Apex on January 3, 2019 APEX BICYCLE PLAN CONTENTS 4 Executive Summary CH.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Existing Conditions
    Updated, April 2012 Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A Existing Conditions Part 1 Demographics and Economics Durham City-County Planning Department Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A, Existing Conditions, Part 1 The Durham Comprehensive Plan Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Administration Element Chapter 2. Land Use Element Chapter 3. Housing Element Chapter 4. Community Character and Design Element Chapter 5. Historic Preservation Element Chapter 6. Economic Development Element Chapter 7. Conservation and Environment Element Chapter 8. Transportation Element Chapter 9. Water Utilities Element Chapter 10. Parks and Recreation Element Chapter 11. Schools Element Chapter 12. Public Safety Element Chapter 13. Solid Waste Element Chapter 14. Libraries Element Chapter 15. Capital Improvements Element Chapter 16. Intergovernmental Cooperation Element Appendices Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A, Existing Conditions, Part 1 Appendix A, Existing Conditions Part 1: Demographics & Economics Chapter Contents Part 1: Demographics and the Economy ..................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 Regional Context .................................................................................. 1 Population .......................................................................................... 8 Economy .......................................................................................... 20 Tables Table 1. Population by Race/Ethnicity .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Trails and Greenways Master Plan
    + Durham Trails and Greenways Master Plan 2011 Durham City Council William V. Bell, Mayor Cora Cole-McFadden, Mayor Pro Tem Farad Ali Eugene A. Brown Diane Catotti Howard Clement, III Mike Woodard Durham County Board of Commissioners Michael D. Page, Chairman Joe Bowser Rebecca M. Heron, Vice Chairman Brenda Howerton Ellen W. Reckhow Durham Open Space and Trails Commission Thomas Stark, Chair Tobias Berla Glen Bowles George A. Brine R. Kelly Bryant, Jr. Lisa Buckley Dan Clever Charles Eilber Robert B. Glenn, Jr. John A. Goebel Ellen Reckhow Deborah Morgan Annette G. Montgomery Jason Nelson Josie Owen-McNeil Kristine Remlinger Titania Roberson David Sokal LaDawnna Summers Clayton Swenson Charlie Welch Will Wilson Mike Woodard The Durham County Board of Commissioners initially adopted the Durham Trails and Greenways Master Plan on June 11, 2001 and the Durham City Council initially adopted the Durham Trails and Greenways Master Plan on September 17, 2001. This update of the Durham Trails and Greenways Plan was adopted by the Durham County Board of Commissioners on _____, and by the Durham City Council on _____. i Durham Trails and Greenways Master Plan Updated 2011 Durham City-County Planning Department ii Contents I. The Greenways and Trails................................................................................................7 A. The Plan Maps ........................................................................................................7 B. The Trails ..............................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Raleigh Greenway
    PARKING TRAIL GRID ID MILEAGE SURFACE FEATURES AND AMENITIES DESCRIPTION PARK FACILITIES For Your Safety And AREAS youtube.com/raleighparksandrec The Safety Of Others • Great Blue Heron habitat Follows Abbotts Creek from the Neuse River Trail to Simms Branch Trail near Abbotts Creek • Connects to Falls River Shopping Center 2, 3, 4, 53, P-8 2.9 Paved the intersection of Durant Road and Cub Trail. The trail is connected by sidewalk • Be alert Trail 54, 83 • Connects to North Wake Landfill District Park, Neuse River Trail, along two sections of Falls River Avenue and along Durant Road. instagram.com/raleighparks • Patrons should be aware of their Simms Branch Trail, and Durant Nature Preserve Discover surroundings on the trail Baileywick Trail H-8 0.6 Paved • Connects to Baileywick Park and Baileywick Elementary School Connects from Strickland Rd to Baileywick Road by passing through Baileywick Park. 73 Our Parks At • Obey signs A natural surface trail located adjacent to Beaver Dam Creek between Wade Beaver Dam maps.raleighnc. pinterest.com/raleighparks H-20 0.8 Unpaved • Connects to Hymettus Woods Park and Windemere Beaver Dam Park Avenue and Devonshire Drive that passes through Windemere Beaver Dam Park. 29 • Wear appropriate safety equipment Trail including helmets, kneepads, elbow pads, The trail is connected by a sidewalk along Dixie Trail. gov/parklocator Birch Ridge A wide sidewalk that connects Poole Road to the Walnut Creek Softball Complex wrist pads, etc Q-26 0.3 Paved • Connects to Walnut Creek Softball Complex Connector (Walnut Creek North Park). — twitter.com/raleighparks • The use of headphones is discouraged— Abbotts Creek Park (Q-8) Centennial • Connects to North Carolina Farmers Market and NC State University headphones impair your ability to hear A multi-purpose path adjacent to Centennial Parkway on the NC State University Anderson Point Park (U-25) Bikeway H-25 2.3 Paved Centennial Campus — your surroundings Centennial Campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenway & Trails
    CHAPTER 6: GREENWAY & TRAILS A. Overview The Town of Cary envisions its greenway network as an emerald necklace that ties together the community’s parks, neighborhoods, schools, cultural sites, and business districts. In the nine years since the approval of the previous 2003 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Facilities Master Plan, the Town has begun to achieve that vision of connectivity. The current greenway network has now grown to over 62 miles of trails. Where the Town’s greenway program once consisted of a series of isolated segments, it is transforming into a system of trails. The 2003 Master Plan also articulated the importance of environmental stewardship in the development of the trail network. Cary has applied sustainable design practice throughout all of its trail projects to maintain open space, wildlife corridors and habitat, use of native vegetation, and effective erosion control measures. Many of these practices have been incorporated into the Town’s greenway design standards and will be implemented in future designs. With regard to design standards, this plan re- articulates Cary’s commitment to the application of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and Americans with Disability Act (ADA) design standards. Although the Town has shown a commitment to greenway construction that rivals any other community in North Carolina, the citizens of Cary continue to demand greater connectivity and linkage to other communities, as well as to other regionally important trail systems. This is due in large part to Cary being the central jurisdiction within the Triangle Area. As such, the Town of Cary plays a crucial role in connecting regional, statewide, and national trails.
    [Show full text]
  • "Babe" Ruth 1922-1925 H&B
    HUGGINS AND SCOTT'S November 10, 2016 AUCTION PRICES REALIZED LOT# TITLE BIDS 1 Rare George "Babe" Ruth 1922-1925 H&B "Kork Grip" Pro Model Bat Ordered For 1923 Opening Day of Yankee Stadium!46 $ 25,991.25 2 1909-11 T206 White Borders Ray Demmitt (St. Louis) Team Variation-- SGC 50 VG-EX 4 12 $ 3,346.00 3 1909-11 T206 White Borders Christy Mathewson (White Cap) SGC 60 EX 5 11 $ 806.63 4 1909-11 T206 White Borders Christy Mathewson (White Cap) SGC 55 VG-EX+ 4.5 11 $ 627.38 5 1909-11 T206 White Borders Christy Mathewson (Portrait) PSA VG-EX 4 15 $ 1,135.25 6 1909-11 T206 White Borders Christy Mathewson (Dark Cap) with Sovereign Back--PSA VG-EX 4 13 $ 687.13 7 1909-11 T206 White Borders Ty Cobb (Bat On Shoulder) Pose--PSA Poor 1 9 $ 567.63 8 1909-11 T206 White Borders Larry Doyle (with Bat) SGC 84 NM 7 4 $ 328.63 9 1909-11 T206 White Borders Johnny Evers (Batting, Chicago on Shirt) SGC 70 EX+ 5.5 7 $ 388.38 10 1909-11 T206 White Borders Frank Delehanty SGC 82 EX-MT+ 6.5 6 $ 215.10 11 1909-11 T206 White Borders Joe Tinker (Bat Off Shoulder) SGC 60 EX 5 11 $ 274.85 12 1909-11 T206 White Borders Frank Chance (Yellow Portrait) SGC 60 EX 5 9 $ 274.85 13 1909-11 T206 White Borders Mordecai Brown (Portrait) SGC 55 VG-EX+ 4.5 5 $ 286.80 14 1909-11 T206 White Borders John McGraw (Portrait, No Cap) SGC 60 EX 5 10 $ 328.63 15 1909-11 T206 White Borders John McGraw (Glove at Hip) SGC 60 EX 5 10 $ 262.90 16 1909-11 T206 White Border Hall of Famers (3)--All SGC 30-60 8 $ 418.25 17 1909-11 T206 White Borders Nap Lajoie SGC 40-50 Graded Trio 21 $ 776.75
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Community Profile
    CHAPTER 3 Community Profile Community Profile Spanning almost 300 square miles, the city and county of Durham are located in the heart of the North Carolina Piedmont Region. Historically known as the “tobacco capital of the world” and the home to Black Wall Street, Durham is known nationwide as a vibrant, diverse and entrepreneurial community. There is a rich agricultural heritage, a diverse population, beautiful land, numerous parks, excellent public services and a strong faith and social justice community. There are many medical resources, non-profits and opportunities available to community members. The demographics of Durham County residents have shifted dramatically over the last decade. Although Durham County is rich in resources, disparities do exist between racial/ethnic groups as well as between lower income and higher income residents. This chapter includes: Demographics Immigrant and refugee populations Racial and ethnic disparities Durham facts and history Land Use Built environment (eg. sidewalks, bike lanes and greenways) Parks and recreation Faith and spirituality 2011 Durham County Community Health Assessment Page | 41 CHAPTER 3 Community Profile Section 3.01 Demographics U.S. Census Bureau 2010 data highlight important demographic and cultural shifts in Durham during the past decade. Since 2000, Durham County’s population has grown over 22% to 267,587, which is slightly higher than the statewide increase of 18.5%.1 Durham is the 6th largest county in North Carolina and approximately 85% of all Durham County residents live within the city limits of Durham. The City of Durham’s population of 228,330 positions Durham as the 5th largest city in the state.2 Durham continues to grow as a racially and ethnically diverse community.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Annual FMST Conference of Task Force
    Inaugural Mountains-to-Sea Trail Town Conference September 4-5, 2014 Hillsborough, NC Thanks to our sponsors and the Hillsborough Tourism Development Authority and Tourism Board What do people experience when they hike the MST? 1,150 miles from the mountains… Adam Warwick, On Shortoff Mountain overlooking Linville Gorge To the sea. Matt Mutel, Relaxing at lunch after a long climb near Mt. Mitchell 2008 Danny Bernstein, Sharon on the Beach MST travelers experience wildness… Matt Mutel, Relaxing at lunch after a long climb near Mt. Mitchell 2008 MST travelers experience wilderness. Wildlife… Jim Hallsey, Green Tree frog Matt Mutel, Relaxing at lunch on MST Sign after a long climb near Mt. Mitchell 2008 Small towns in the West… 1st Place – VIEW FROM THE TRAIL 2012 Brenden Kjar, Rays of Light on the MST in Craggy Gardens area Downtown Sylva NC And small towns in the East… Train depot in downtown Burgaw on Osgood Canal Greenway Downtown Sylva NC Historic sites… Neuse River Greenway – 32 miles from Raleigh to Clayton plus 3 miles in Smithfield – Photo by Chris Johnson NC Culture, Bentonville Battle reenactment. Places to learn about nature & history… Places to learn about nature… NC Culture, Bentonville Battle reenactment. And people who call North Carolina home. Lora Arrington, Doug’s Grocery & Grill. The MST is primarily a footpath built and maintained by volunteers Gregory Scott, Installing the bridge at Falls Lake 2011 Margaret Lillard, Volunteers at Falls Lake. It follows back roads to connect trail segments. Glenn Strouhal, Road in Coastal Plain. The route goes through 37 counties and 41 towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Justice As It Pertains to Safety on the American Tobacco Trail
    Social Justice as it Pertains to Safety on the American Tobacco Trail 1 2 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation for their generous funding of this study. We would like to acknowledge the many people, institutions, and participants that contrib- uted to this study including: Carrie Banks, Executive Director (former) Roger Ekstrom, Research Assistant NC Rail-Trails NC State University Emily Herbert, Executive Director (current) Shane Cutshaw, Research Assistant NC Rail-Trails NC State University Kofi Boone, Associate Professor Elizabeth Daniel, Research Assistant NC State University NC State University Dr. Deborah Bailey, Director John Parsons, Research Assistant Community Engagement and Service NC State University NC Central University Tyler Waring, GIS Analyst II Charlynne T. Smith, CISP Technology Solutions, City of Durham GIS Research Associate NC State University Mary Anne Roberts Crime Analysis Supervisor Lucretia Pinckney, Research Assistant Durham Police Department NC Central University Durham Police Department 3 “The best part of my workday is the bike ride on the trail to Downtown Durham.” Anonymous comment from study survey 4 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 6 Introduction 8 Historic Hayti 10 Literature Review 13 Crime on the American Tobacco Trail 17 Methodology 20 Field Observations 23 Geospatial Analysis 24 Community Workshop One 26 Community Workshop Two 28 Surveys 32 Community Workshop Three 35 Recommendations 37 5 Executive Summary The purpose of this study was to examine an 14 crimes occurred on the trail. Less than a ½ area along the American Tobacco Trail (ATT) in percent of all area crimes occurred on the trail. Durham, North Carolina that experienced an The ATT is not crime free, but it is safe and increase in crime in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Where Great Things Happen
    self-guided WALKING TOUR o f Downtown Where great things happen Downtown Durham, North Carolina’s first commercial district on the National Register of Historic Places, is the historic and geographic soul of a compact, walkable, and vibrant place Follow along with filled with exciting dining, activities, and more. the tour on your Thousands of visitors and residents, including workers from Research Triangle Park, mobile phone by North Carolina Central University, and Duke University, experience Downtown’s going to bit.ly/ offerings daily, all within easy reach thanks to the Bull City Connector, a free bus durhamdtwt or route connecting Downtown and Duke. scanning the QR code below. This Self-Guided Walking Tour is a companion to the Official Downtown Durham Map (shown at left) produced by the Durham Convention & Visitors Bureau in partnership with Downtown Durham Inc., which contains complete listings of Downtown’s restaurants, shopping, and entertainment options. Request a copy through the Durham Visitor Information Center, the first stop on the tour (101 E Morgan St in Downtown) or from one of DDI’s Downtown Ambassadors. St Bay Minerva Ave Hargrove St Edward St W Geer St A10 Gloria Ave Tour Routes Northwood Cir A15 Main Route: A12 Miosha St Downtown Loop Lamond Ave A11 St Madison Miosha St A14 A16 W Corporation St Extensiont A: Central North St North S A13 Mission Pl y e N Duke St Parkl & Warehouse r u Lyric St DistrictsG Fuller St E Corporation St Extension B: Liggett St A9 Wake Pl Rigsbee Ave Broadway St Morris St Warehouse & Brightleaf Roney St Albemarle St Foster St A17 Fernway Ave Districts A8 St Tucker B2 A7 A6 Dowd St N Gregson St W Morgan St Hunt St Extension C: B4 Hunt St Warehouse & American Tobacco Districts N Duke St A18 Gray Ave W A4 Wilkerson Ave Pe B3 ab Seminary A5 Bus.
    [Show full text]
  • LOT# TITLE BIDS SALE PRICE 1 Actual Football Thrown from Unitas
    Huggins and Scott's February 11, 2016 Auction Prices Realized SALE LOT# TITLE BIDS PRICE 1 Actual Football Thrown From Unitas To Berry for TD Pass in 1958 NFL Championship Game with Impeccable Provenance5 $ 62,140.00 [reserve met] 2 Historic Christy Mathewson Single-Signed Ball - From Matty's Famous 1921 Polo Grounds "Testimonial" Fundraiser19 $ [reserve 41,825.00 met] 3 1902-11 W600 Sporting Life Cabinets Honus Wagner (Uniform)—SGC 30 Good 2 37 $ 15,833.75 4 1887 N28 Allen & Ginter Hall of Fame PSA Graded Poor 1 Quartet with Anson, Clarkson, Kelly & Ward 19 $ 1,792.50 5 1888 E223 G&B Chewing Gum Con Daily SGC 10 Poor 1 19 $ 3,346.00 6 1887 N172 Old Judge SGC Graded Cards (5) 10 $ 537.75 7 1909 E90-1 American Caramel Willie Keeler (Throwing) - PSA GOOD+ 2.5 23 $ 1,075.50 8 1910 E93 Standard Caramel Ty Cobb SGC 20 Fair 1.5 17 $ 1,105.38 9 1909 E95 Philadelphia Caramel Ty Cobb SGC 10 Poor 1 32 $ 1,792.50 10 1909 E95 Philadelphia Caramel Honus Wagner--PSA Authentic 10 $ 537.75 11 1910 E98 Anonymous Ty Cobb--SGC 20 Fair 1.5 18 $ 2,509.50 12 1908 E102 Anonymous Ty Cobb--SGC 20 Fair 1.5 20 $ 2,031.50 13 1912 T202 Hassan Triple Folder PSA Graded Cards (7) with PSA 4.5 Cobb 23 $ 1,314.50 14 1911 T201 Mecca Double Folders Starter Set of (27) Different with (8) SGC Graded Stars 22 $ 1,673.00 15 1911 T201 Mecca Double Folders SGC 84 NM 7 Graded Pair with None Better 11 $ 358.50 16 1911 T201 Mecca Double Folders M.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuse River Trail – Report of Recommendations Summarizes the Findings of the Staff Representatives
    Neuse River Trail Report of Recommendations I. Executive Summary………………………………………………… 3 II. Introduction………………………………………………………… 5 A. Purpose of Report..……………………………………………… 5 B. Project Background……………………………………………… 5 C. Planning Process………………………………………………… 6 III. Analysis of Trail Corridor, Segments and Connections…………. 9 A. Overview of Neuse River Trail Corridor………………………… 9 B. Overview of Trail Segments and Connections…………………... 14 Segment 1: Falls of Neuse Rd to Capital Blvd ………………….. 14 Segment 2: Capital Blvd to CASL Complex ……………………. 20 Connection A: Wake Forest..……………………………………. 25 Segment 3: CASL Complex to Buffaloe Rd ……………………. 29 Segment 4: Buffaloe Rd to Skycrest Dr ………………………… 34 Segment 5: Skycrest Dr to Crabtree Creek …………………….. 39 Connection B: Knightdale Connection…………………………. 45 Segment 6: Crabtree Creek to Poole Rd ………………………… 49 Segment 7: Poole Rd to Auburn Knightdale Rd ………………… 54 Segment 8: Auburn Knightdale Rd to TerraGator Bridge ……… 59 Segment 9: TerraGator Bridge to Mial Plantation Rd …………… 65 Segment 10: Mial Plantation Rd to Wake/Johnston County Line . 70 IV. Implementation ……………………………………………………. 75 A. Trail Design …………………………………………………….. 75 B. Estimated Project Costs ………………………………………… 78 C. Potential Environmental Impacts ………………………………. 81 D. Permitting Requirements ………………………………………. 82 E. Project Schedule ………………………………………………… 83 F. Sources of Funding ……………………………………………… 84 V. Maintenance and Management……………………………………. 87 VI. Appendix……..……………………………………………………… 91 A. Meeting Minutes………………………………………………….. 91 1 2 Executive Summary The Neuse River Trail – Report of Recommendations summarizes the findings of the staff representatives. The individuals who participated include: Vic Lebsock, Lisa Potts, and Stefanie Toftey – City of Raleigh; Tim Maloney, Jennifer Willis, and Chris Snow – Wake County; Ann Ayers, Candace Davis - Town of Wake Forest, Tina Cheek – Town of Knightdale; Tom Norman, Kumar Trivedi, Jeff Cox, and Bob Mosher – North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT); Susan Carl - North Carolina Parks and Recreation.
    [Show full text]