DOCSLIB.ORG

Alleged Predatory Publisher Buys Medical Journals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alleged Predatory Publisher Buys Medical Journals News CMAJ Alleged predatory publisher buys medical journals ne of the world’s most well- known “predatory” publishers O has bought two commercial Canadian publishers of about 16 medi- cal specialty journals. But one former owner says during the purchasing negotiations, the new publisher agreed not use predatory practices. The journals were previously pub- lished by Pulsus Group in Oakville, Ontario, and Andrew John Publishing in Dundas, Ontario. As of September 28, the journals appear on the Pulsus Group website, which gives an address in Lon- don, UK, where Pulsus Group UK was registered in August 2016. It is a subsid- Pulsus Group iary of OMICS International of Hyder- Pulsus journals are now owned by a newly created subsidiary of OMICS International, abad, India, which is facing charges from an alleged predatory publisher based in Hyderabad, India. the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for “deceiving academics and researchers OMICS. Brockington learned this during nals’ impact factors and listing in Scopus about the nature of its publications and a conference call with the new publisher and PubMed, in order to look legitimate, hiding publication fees ranging from hun- when she asked who now owned Pulsus he adds. dreds to thousands of dollars,” according Group. When she contacted editors of Beall says OMICS’ main practice is to an FTC statement. other Pulsus journals, they were unaware to “hold papers hostage.” Authors sub- Prior to this latest sale, back in that the new publisher was OMICS. mit papers in response to spam emails December 2015, Pulsus sold four jour- When Robert Kalina decided to looking for submissions. “The next nals to Hindawi, an open-access pub- retire after running Pulsus since 1984, thing they know the paper has been pub- lisher based in Cairo, Egypt. In June he said he searched for potential buyers, lished and they’ve got an invoice for 2016, Pulsus told its remaining journals but could find “no other takers” for the $2000. They ask to withdraw it, and it was selling them to an unnamed “inter- remaining journals. In an emailed state- OMICS won’t withdraw it unless you national publisher,” according to Carly ment he said, “Scientific publishing has pay a fee.” This practice is mentioned in Brockington, managing editor of the been my life and I took great care in the FTC charges, which also noted Canadian Journal of Respiratory Ther- crafting an agreement with OMICS that “many articles are published with little apy (CJRT). In late August, Pulsus exec- would continue to protect the societies’ to no peer review and numerous individ- utives told Brockington that Pulsus interests. I would not have trusted sell- uals represented to be editors have not would merge with Andrew John but they ing the name Pulsus to them if I thought agreed to be affiliated with the journals.” would be run as separate companies. otherwise.” He stated that he believed Kalina said that journals are not However, the journals published by OMICS bought Pulsus in order to “start forced to go to OMICS. “Since most of Andrew John were told in mid-Septem- anew” as a legitimate publisher. The these journals are owned by the societ- ber they had been sold to iMedPub, a FTC charges surfaced after the sale. ies, they are, for the most part, free to subsidiary of OMICS, says Dr. Stephen Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the Univer- choose their own publisher. We have Hwang, president of the Canadian sity of Colorado Denver who blogs about offered our help to all societies wishing Society of Internal Medicine, which predatory publishers, says OMICS’ pred- not to work with OMICS to terminate owns the Canadian Journal of General atory practices are well known. Predatory their agreement,” and two journals Internal Medicine. All the former Pul- publishers exploit a fully open access have asked to terminate. sus and Andrew John journals now model “for their own gratuitous profit,” However, Brockington said CJRT appear on the Pulsus website; the said Beall. Predatory publishers usually was offered no such assistance. It is now Andrew John website has closed down. start “counterfeit” journals, and OMICS seeking termination of its contract with Attempts to reach owners of Andrew is the only one that has previously bought the help of a lawyer. — Carolyn Brown, John for a response were unsuccessful. legitimate journals, Beall says. “OMICS Ottawa, Ont. Brockington and Hwang were not is not only buying journals, it is buying told that the new publisher was in fact metrics and indexing,” such as the jour- CMAJ 2016. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.109-5338 E398 CMAJ, November 1, 2016, 188(16) © 2016 Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Use of Omics Data in Fracture Prediction; a Scoping and Systematic Review in Horses and Humans
    animals Review Use of Omics Data in Fracture Prediction; a Scoping and Systematic Review in Horses and Humans Seungmee Lee 1,*, Melissa E. Baker 1, Michael Clinton 2 and Sarah E. Taylor 1 1 The Dick Vet Equine Hospital, The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK; [email protected] (M.E.B.); [email protected] (S.E.T.) 2 The RICE Group, Division of Gene Function and Development, The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Despite many recent advances in imaging and epidemiological data analysis, musculoskeletal injuries continue to be a welfare issue in racehorses. Omics studies describe the study of protein, genetic material (both DNA and RNA, including microRNAs—small non-coding ribonucleic acids) and metabolites that may provide insights into the pathophysiology of disease or opportunities to monitor response to treatment when measured in bodily fluids. As these fields of study are scientifically complex and highly specialised, it is timely to perform a review of the current literature to allow for the design of robust studies that allow for repeatable work. Systematic reviews have been introduced into the medical literature and are a methodological way of searching for relevant papers followed by critical review of the content and a detection of biases. The objectives of the current systematic review were to identify and critically appraise the literature pertaining to microRNA (miRNA) and their target genes that are correlated with stress fractures in racehorses and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Analysis of the Usability and Archival Stability of Omics Computational
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/452532; this version posted October 25, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Title: A comprehensive analysis of the usability and archival stability of omics computational tools and resources 1,2$# 2$ 1 1 3 1 Serghei Mangul ​, Thiago Mosqueiro ,​ Dat Duong ,​ Keith Mitchell ,Varuni​ Sarwal ,​ Brian Hill ,​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 4 1 1 1 7 Jaqueline Brito ,​ Russell Jared Littman ,​ Benjamin Statz ,​ Angela Ka-Mei Lam ,​ Gargi Dayama ,​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 7 2 5 1,6 7,8 Laura Grieneisen ,​ Lana S. Martin ,​ Jonathan Flint ,​ Eleazar Eskin ,​ Ran Blekhman ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 1 Department​ of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, 580 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 2 Institute​ for Quantitative and Computational Biosciences, University of California Los Angeles, 611 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 3 Indian​ Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, Delhi 110016, India 4 ​ Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 5 Center​ for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 6 Department​ of Human Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, 695 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 7 Department​ of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, 321 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA 8 Department​ of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Cir, Falcon Heights, MN 55108, USA $ - These authors contributed equally to the paper # - Corresponding author 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/452532; this version posted October 25, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited
    publications Article How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited Bo-Christer Björk 1,*, Sari Kanto-Karvonen 2 and J. Tuomas Harviainen 2 1 Hanken School of Economics, P.O. Box 479, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland 2 Department of Information Studies and Interactive Media, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; Sari.Kanto@ilmarinen.fi (S.K.-K.); tuomas.harviainen@tuni.fi (J.T.H.) * Correspondence: bo-christer.bjork@hanken.fi Received: 19 February 2020; Accepted: 24 March 2020; Published: 26 March 2020 Abstract: Predatory journals are Open Access journals of highly questionable scientific quality. Such journals pretend to use peer review for quality assurance, and spam academics with requests for submissions, in order to collect author payments. In recent years predatory journals have received a lot of negative media. While much has been said about the harm that such journals cause to academic publishing in general, an overlooked aspect is how much articles in such journals are actually read and in particular cited, that is if they have any significant impact on the research in their fields. Other studies have already demonstrated that only some of the articles in predatory journals contain faulty and directly harmful results, while a lot of the articles present mediocre and poorly reported studies. We studied citation statistics over a five-year period in Google Scholar for 250 random articles published in such journals in 2014 and found an average of 2.6 citations per article, and that 56% of the articles had no citations at all. For comparison, a random sample of articles published in the approximately 25,000 peer reviewed journals included in the Scopus index had an average of 18, 1 citations in the same period with only 9% receiving no citations.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This
    Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia ISSN: 0120-6230 ISSN: 2422-2844 Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia Botero, Maryory Astrid Gómez Editorial Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, no. 90, 2019, January-March, pp. 7-8 Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia DOI: 10.17533/udea.redin.n90a01 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=43065097001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia, No.90, pp. 7-8, Jan-Mar 2019 EDITORIAL Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado, The characteristics common to all these predatory Denver, called ”predatory Publisher” to publishers who journals and publishers are [1]: create an exploitative open-access academic publishing business model, what many have called an era of academic 1. There are no such reviewers and the works are extortion. Under this model, they charge publication fees published without any type of Peer Review. to authors without providing the editorial services of 2. They do not have indexing in any international legitimate journals. In 2008, Beall began to publish a database or repository. list of journals and publishers potentially or probably predators; in 2011, the list had 18 publishers, and in 2017 3. They do not offer editing service or assistance to the it had a list of more than 1100 journals and publishers that authors to improve the works.
    [Show full text]
  • IT Reprint Hindawi
    Reprint and OA content. Emboldened by the suc- role in establishing the Open Access Hindawi cess of the hybrid model, Hindawi moved Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA; to an all-OA approach for its journals by www.oaspa.org). According to OASPA, the 2007. By the end of that year, the company group’s aim is to support and “represent Publishing: announced a joint initiative with SAGE the interests of Open Access (OA) journal Publications to publish a collection of OA publishers globally in all scientific, tech- journals, leveraging Hindawi’s production nical, and scholarly disciplines … through A Working technology and SAGE’s editorial expertise. exchanging information, setting stan- dards, advancing models, advocacy, edu- OA Model Keys to Rapid Growth cation, and the promotion of innovation.” The move to an all-OA model has been Who’s the Customer? paying off. Paul Peters, Hindawi’s head by NANCY DAVIS KHO | of business development, says the com- In traditional scholarly publishing, the pany now publishes 275 journals, about customer has been a library subscriber to In the 3 years since academic pub- 10% of which are carried on the SAGE- journals. “We were terrible at dealing with lisher Hindawi Publishing Corp. moved Hindawi Access to Research platform. libraries,” says Peters. “Being in Egypt, to a strictly open access (OA) publishing Reflecting the growth in the number you just can’t send a sales team over to model, the perception of OA has shifted. of journals published is a commensurate talk to them about our journal offerings.” Once viewed as a radical upending of tra- jump in submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Beall's List
    scholarly communication Monica Berger and Jill Cirasella Beyond Beall’s List Better understanding predatory publishers f you have even a fleeting interest in the deeply problematic submissions (e.g., Ievolving landscape of scholarly communi- Andrew Wakefield et al.’s article linking cation, you’ve probably heard of predatory autism to vaccines in The Lancet1 and Alan open access (OA) journals. These are OA Sokal’s nonsense article in Social Text).2 journals that exist for the sole purpose of Although predatory publishers predate profit, not the dissemination of high-quality OA, their recent explosion was expedited research findings and furtherance of knowl- by the emergence and success of fee- edge. These predators generate profits by charging OA journals. No matter how charging author fees, also known as article strong our urge to support and defend processing charges (APCs), that far exceed OA, librarians cannot deny the profusion the cost of running their low-quality, fly- of predators in the OA arena; John Bohan- by-night operations. non’s recent “sting” made abundantly clear Charging a fee is not itself a marker of (despite methodological flaws) that there a predatory publisher: many reputable OA are many bad actors.3 Rather, we should journals use APCs to cover costs, especially seek to understand their methods, track in fields where research is often funded by their evolution, and communicate their grants. (Many subscription-based journals characteristics to our patrons. also charge authors fees, sometimes per page or illustration.) However, predatory Blacklists, whitelists, and other journals are primarily fee-collecting op- defenses against predatory erations—they exist for that purpose and publishers only incidentally publish articles, gener- The highest-profile watchdog of predatory ally without rigorous peer review, despite publishers is Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at claims to the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Accreditation and Need of a Bibliometric Measure to Distinguish Predatory Conferences
    publications Viewpoint Conference Accreditation and Need of a Bibliometric Measure to Distinguish Predatory Conferences Pooyan Makvandi 1,* , Anahita Nodehi 2 and Franklin R. Tay 3 1 Centre for Materials Interfaces, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, Italy 2 Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications (DiSIA), Florence University, Viale Morgagni 59, 50134 Florence, Italy; Anahita.nodehi@unifi.it 3 The Graduate School, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: Academic conferences offer scientists the opportunity to share their findings and knowledge with other researchers. However, the number of conferences is rapidly increasing globally and many unsolicited e-mails are received from conference organizers. These e-mails take time for researchers to read and ascertain their legitimacy. Because not every conference is of high quality, there is a need for young researchers and scholars to recognize the so-called “predatory conferences” which make a profit from unsuspecting researchers without the core purpose of advancing science or collaboration. Unlike journals that possess accreditation indices, there is no appropriate accreditation for international conferences. Here, a bibliometric measure is proposed that enables scholars to evaluate conference quality before attending. Keywords: conference indicator; conference impact factor; conference accreditation; bibliometric measure Citation: Makvandi, P.; Nodehi, A.; Tay, F.R. Conference Accreditation and Need of a Bibliometric Measure 1. Introduction to Distinguish Predatory Conferences. Academic conferences offer scientists the opportunity to share their findings and Publications 2021, 9, 16. https:// knowledge with other researchers. Conferences are organized by institutions or societies, doi.org/10.3390/publications9020016 and in rare cases, by individuals [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Publishing Practices: Is There Life After Beall's List?
    volume 27, issue 2, pages 53-70 (2017) Predatory Publishing Practices: Is There Life After Beall’s List? Denise Rosemary Nicholson Scholarly Communications and Copyright Services Office, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] ABSTRACT Background. Scholarly communication is an ever-evolving practice. As publishing advanced from the printed format to digital formats, new trends, practices and platforms emerged in academia. As reputable publishers adapted their business models to accommodate open access, many non-reputable publishers have emerged with questionable business models and less-than- favourable or unacceptable publishing services. Objectives. This paper discusses changing trends in scholarly publishing, the advent of and problems caused by pervasive predatory publishing practices, and possible solutions. The paper also investigates possible alternatives to Beall’s list and whether a “one-stop shop” black- or white list would serve as a comprehensive tool for scholarly authors. Results. The paper concludes that there is no “one-stop shop” or comprehensive resource or guidelines available at this stage for scholarly authors to consult before publishing. It alerts scholars to be cautious and to do research about potential publishers, before submitting manuscripts for publication. Contributions. It provides recommendations and some useful resources to assist authors before they publish their works. INTRODUCTION The landscape of scholarly communication is ever-evolving. Ever since the first printed publication there have been variant policies, practices, standards and processes in publishing houses. There have been excellent high or gold standard publishers offering peer-review by expert researchers in their specific disciplines. They also offer impact factors attractive to researchers, reasonable subscription fees and ancillary services.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED - JOURNAL LIST Total Journals: 8631
    SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED - JOURNAL LIST Total journals: 8631 1. 4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH 2. AAPG BULLETIN 3. AAPS JOURNAL 4. AAPS PHARMSCITECH 5. AATCC REVIEW 6. ABDOMINAL IMAGING 7. ABHANDLUNGEN AUS DEM MATHEMATISCHEN SEMINAR DER UNIVERSITAT HAMBURG 8. ABSTRACT AND APPLIED ANALYSIS 9. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 10. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 11. ACADEMIC MEDICINE 12. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS 13. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 14. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 15. ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 16. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 17. ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL 18. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL 19. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS 20. ACM JOURNAL ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS 21. ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW 22. ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES 23. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ALGORITHMS 24. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED PERCEPTION 25. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ARCHITECTURE AND CODE OPTIMIZATION 26. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUTONOMOUS AND ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS 27. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC 28. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS 29. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION 30. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DATABASE SYSTEMS 31. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DESIGN AUTOMATION OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 32. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON EMBEDDED COMPUTING SYSTEMS 33. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS 34. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEM SECURITY 35. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS 36. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY 37. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY 38. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA 39. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE 40. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION 41. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA COMPUTING COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS 42. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS 43. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON RECONFIGURABLE TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS 44.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunistic Journals in the Clinical Pharmacology Spacea
    ACCP Position Statement Clinical Pharmacology Opportunistic Journals in the Clinical in Drug Development 2018, 7(4) 353–357 C 2018, The American College of Pharmacology Space: Clinical Pharmacology DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.466 A Policy Statement From the Publications and Public Policy Committees of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology David J. Greenblatt and Joseph S. Bertino Jr “Predatory journal” is the customary term, but “oppor- nations where labor costs are low. Sadly, it is not only tunistic journal” is more accurate. The situation that we opportunistic publishers that are involved in publishing face is a product of economic opportunity in a free- these journals, but more mainstream publishers are market economy. Profit is to be made through busi- involved as well.7,8 ness enterprises founded to fill a need for a product The process of promoting an opportunistic journal or service that people are willing to pay for. In addi- involves aggregation of E-mail addresses of potential tion, an awards system has been put into place by some author recruits, acquired through scans of legitimate foreign governments based only on having a publica- biomedical publications. Mass electronic mailings ag- tion in a journal.1 Entrepreneurs of predatory journals gressively solicit submissions of manuscripts, promising have stepped forward to fill these “needs,” apparently rapid peer-review, rapid open-access publication of with substantial success. The problem is that the legiti- accepted manuscripts, and extensive exposure of “your mate biomedical publication process, and the system of esteemed research” to the biomedical community.9 The merit-based peer-review used by academic medical and undersigned authors (DJG and JSB) typically receive scientific journals, are collateral damage.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Predatory Journals and Publishers
    List of predatory journals and publishers Jiban Shrestha Nepal Agricultural Research Council, National Plant Breeding and Genetics Research Centre, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal Email: [email protected] The predatory publications are a big challenge, especially in developing countries including Nepal. Predatory publishing not only harms or degrades academic reputations but also wastes time, money, resources, and efforts (Shrestha et al., 2020). Predatory publications pose a danger that could undermine the quality, integrity, and reliability of published scientific research works. Predatory publications also harm the reputation of the universities and research organizations which are connected with these publications. Universities and research organizations should educate researchers, especially juniors, about the existence of predatory journals, the dangers they pose, and ways to avoid them (Shrestha, 2020). The problem of potential open access predatory or fake publications is an important issue that must be actively discussed at national, regional and world level within academic communities (Shrestha et al., 2018b). Predatory publications must be avoided or excluded while evaluating CV or biodata of researchers for job promotion and releasing the research grants. The authors should be careful about predatory or fake journals/publishers for communicating their scientific works (Shrestha et al., 2018a). The researchers should be aware of the quality of journals while publishing their research results (Shrestha et al., 2020). There is
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Route Open Access Journals in Engineering and Technology: Analysis of Research Impact and Implications for Scholarly Communication
    Gold Route Open Access Journals in Engineering and Technology: Analysis of Research Impact and Implications for Scholarly Communication Ifeanyi J. Ezema, Ph.D Research Fellow Department of Information Science University of South Africa Nnamdi Azikiwe Library University of Nigeria Nsukka [email protected] Abstract This study examines the research impact of gold open access (OA) journals in engineering and technology. A total of 37 gold route journals that request article processing charges (APC) and 66 other OA journals without APC (i.e., platinum OA) in the field were found in the Directory of Open Access Journals and used for the study. The publishers, APC charges, and the year each journal was added to DOAJ were identified and included in this study. An informetric approach was used to extract research impact indicators (citations, paper productivity, cite/paper, cite/journal, and h-index) of journals. Findings revealed that the publishers of the APC journals were dominated by commercial publishing companies, producing over 60% of the journals. Article processing charges ranged from $7.60 to $3,471.50, with an average of $727.00. Gold route open access (APC) journals performed better than open access non-APC OA journals, since they produced 51.2% of the papers, 71.8% of the total citations, and 65.1% of the total h- index. There was a weak positive correlation between the APC amount of the gold route journals and their research impact. Introduction The past one and a half decades has witnessed a revolution in scholarly communication with the emergence of open access publishing.
    [Show full text]