List of Predatory Journals and Publishers
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Predatory Journals
PREDATORY JOURNALS Midi de l’info scientifique [email protected] June 5, 2018 [email protected] June 14, 2018 LIBRARY 2 AGENDA 1. Quick survey 2. What’s a predatory Journal? • Definition • Numbers • Examples 3. Why could it be a problem? 4. Tools and Checklists LIBRARY 3 QUICK SURVEY https://votamatic.unige.ch/ Code d'accès rapide : NSFD LIBRARY 4 WHAT’S A PREDATORY JOURNAL? “Predatory journals pose as scientific journals: they offer to publish articles in return for a fee, but they do not offer services with regard to quality control and editing as you would expect from a serious scientific journal.” (SNSF’s position with regard to predatory journals – Open Access Publication) LIBRARY 5 Classic Gold Open Access Journal Selection Free Article Article and Access + Processing Publication Submission correction Storage + Charge process Visibility Quality Long term Peer-review Editors’ guarantee assessment conservation + selection + correction included in LIBRARY Databases 6 Predatory Journal Selection Free Article Article and Access + Processing Publication Submission correction Storage + Charge process Visibility Peer-review Editors’ assessment selection + correction LIBRARY 7 PREDATORY JOURNALS’ PRACTICES A wide array of unethical business practices, such as • Fraudulent claims: about where they are indexed, impact factors • False pretense: copying names and designs of established journals • Deceptive promesses: implausible swift publication, yet peer review • No transparency: about quality control, fees, copyright, withdrawal and digital archiving • Fictional editorial boards, or using the names of recognised researchers without their knowledge ! • Spam emails, sometime overly flattering Adapted from SNSF 2018 LIBRARY 8 SOME NUMBERS • 11’873 predatory journals from 996 publishers in 2014 • 420’000 articles published in 2014 • Georgraphic repartition of the authors • 60% from Asia, • 16% from Africa • 18% from western countries • Repartition by discipline • Mainly engeneering, biomedecine and social sciences (Shen C. -
Opportunistic Journals in the Clinical Pharmacology Spacea
ACCP Position Statement Clinical Pharmacology Opportunistic Journals in the Clinical in Drug Development 2018, 7(4) 353–357 C 2018, The American College of Pharmacology Space: Clinical Pharmacology DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.466 A Policy Statement From the Publications and Public Policy Committees of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology David J. Greenblatt and Joseph S. Bertino Jr “Predatory journal” is the customary term, but “oppor- nations where labor costs are low. Sadly, it is not only tunistic journal” is more accurate. The situation that we opportunistic publishers that are involved in publishing face is a product of economic opportunity in a free- these journals, but more mainstream publishers are market economy. Profit is to be made through busi- involved as well.7,8 ness enterprises founded to fill a need for a product The process of promoting an opportunistic journal or service that people are willing to pay for. In addi- involves aggregation of E-mail addresses of potential tion, an awards system has been put into place by some author recruits, acquired through scans of legitimate foreign governments based only on having a publica- biomedical publications. Mass electronic mailings ag- tion in a journal.1 Entrepreneurs of predatory journals gressively solicit submissions of manuscripts, promising have stepped forward to fill these “needs,” apparently rapid peer-review, rapid open-access publication of with substantial success. The problem is that the legiti- accepted manuscripts, and extensive exposure of “your mate biomedical publication process, and the system of esteemed research” to the biomedical community.9 The merit-based peer-review used by academic medical and undersigned authors (DJG and JSB) typically receive scientific journals, are collateral damage. -
Free Download
HOW TRUSTWORTHY? AN EXHIBITION ON NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, AND MEASURING INTEGRITY ISBN 978-3-00-061938-0 © 2019 HEADT Centre Publications, Berlin Cover Image Eagle Nebula, M 16, Messier 16 NASA, ESA / Hubble and the Hubble Heritage Team (2015) Original picture in color, greyscale edited © HEADT Centre (2018) Typesetting and Design Kerstin Kühl Print and Binding 15 Grad Printed in Germany www.headt.eu 1 EXHIBITION CATALOGUE HOW TRUSTWORTHY? AN EXHIBITION ON NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, AND MEASURING INTEGRITY Edited by Dr. Thorsten Stephan Beck, Melanie Rügenhagen and Prof. Dr. Michael Seadle HEADT Centre Publications goal of the exhibition The goal of this exhibition is to increase awareness about research integrity. The exhibition highlights areas where both human errors and intentional manipulation have resulted in the loss of positions and damage to careers. Students, doctoral students, and early career scholars especially need to recognize the risks, but senior scholars can also be caught and sometimes are caught for actions decades earlier. There is no statute of limitations for breaches of good scholarly practice. This exhibition serves as a learning tool. It was designed in part by students in a project seminar offered in the joint master’s programme on Digital Curation between Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and King’s College London. The exhibition has four parts. One has to do with image manipulation and falsification, ranging from art works to tests used in medical studies. Another focuses on research data, including human errors, bad choices, and complete fabrication. A third is concerned with text-based information, and discusses plagiarism as well as fake journals and censorship. -
Open Access & Predatory Journals
Open Access & Predatory Journals [email protected] Vincent Larivière @lariviev crc.ebsi.umontreal.ca Chaire de recherche du Canada sur les transformations de la communication savante École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information Outline • Corporate control of publishing • Open Access • Predatory publishers • Impact Factor • And fake impact factors… • Outlook: What do we need journals for? The digital era • Early 1990s typically considered as turning point • Democratization of use mid 1990s • Characteristics of digital scientific information: • Easy to create, update, reuse, access, transmit • Require less space Financial Times et Elsevier (1995) • Elsevier, the largest publisher of scientific journals, would be “the internet’s first victim”. • “The web had been created to bring academics together; now it offered them a way of sharing their research online for free. What need would anyone have for fusty, expensive journals?” Consolidation of the publishing industry Percentage of WoS papers controlled by 5 big publishers: Consolidation of the publishing industry Control of top 5 big publishers in the SSH: Consolidation of the publishing industry Profit margin of Elsevier: Profits of corporate publishers Springer’s John Wiley & Taylor & Elsevier Science + Sons Francis Business Media Revenus 2012 3,3 milliards 1,4 milliard 1 milliard 566 millions ($ CAN) Profits 2012 1,3 milliard 483 millions 437 millions 210 millions ($ CAN) Marge 39,4% 34,5% 43,7% 37,1% Consolidationof the ARLbudget Augmentation depuis 1986 125% 175% 225% 275% 325% 375% 425% -25% 25% 75% 1986 1987 1988 increase 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 for 1995 publishing 1996 1997 periodicals 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 industry 2004 and books 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 (+71) Monographies (+402%) Revues Open Access • Starts with the advent of the digital age (1990s) • Computer scientists have been sharing preprints on FTP servers since the 1970s. -
Alleged Predatory Publisher Buys Medical Journals
News CMAJ Alleged predatory publisher buys medical journals ne of the world’s most well- known “predatory” publishers O has bought two commercial Canadian publishers of about 16 medi- cal specialty journals. But one former owner says during the purchasing negotiations, the new publisher agreed not use predatory practices. The journals were previously pub- lished by Pulsus Group in Oakville, Ontario, and Andrew John Publishing in Dundas, Ontario. As of September 28, the journals appear on the Pulsus Group website, which gives an address in Lon- don, UK, where Pulsus Group UK was registered in August 2016. It is a subsid- Pulsus Group iary of OMICS International of Hyder- Pulsus journals are now owned by a newly created subsidiary of OMICS International, abad, India, which is facing charges from an alleged predatory publisher based in Hyderabad, India. the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for “deceiving academics and researchers OMICS. Brockington learned this during nals’ impact factors and listing in Scopus about the nature of its publications and a conference call with the new publisher and PubMed, in order to look legitimate, hiding publication fees ranging from hun- when she asked who now owned Pulsus he adds. dreds to thousands of dollars,” according Group. When she contacted editors of Beall says OMICS’ main practice is to an FTC statement. other Pulsus journals, they were unaware to “hold papers hostage.” Authors sub- Prior to this latest sale, back in that the new publisher was OMICS. mit papers in response to spam emails December 2015, Pulsus sold four jour- When Robert Kalina decided to looking for submissions. -
Coffee Lectures: Predatory Publishers
E-Publishing Coffee Lectures Be aware: predatory publishers Dr. Rainer Rees 17 June 2020, Webinar via Zoom Goals: - Awareness - You know criteria for identifying Predatory Publishers and journals ETH Library 24.06.2020 2 Definition: What are we talking about? • Definition: “Predatory journals and publishers are entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publication practices, a lack of transparency, and/or the use of aggressive and indiscriminate solicitation practices.” Grudniewicz, A. (et al.), Nature 576, 210-212 (2019) 10.1038/d41586- 019-03759-y • Not included − Intent to deceive − Journal quality − Quality of peer review: − no or negligent peer review is often a prominent feature of predatory journals − currently impossible to assess − lack of transparent legitimate journals open peer review, open data Dr. Rainer Rees 02.04.2020 3 Scale of the problem: Why are we talking about it? ETH Library 24.06.2020 4 50 Shades of Predatory Publishing Grudniewicz, A. (et al.), Nature 576, 210-212 (2019) 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y Kyle Siler (2020), https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/05/13/there-is-no-black-and-white-definition-of-predatory- publishing/ last accessed: 07.06.2020 Dr. Rainer Rees 02.04.2020 5 Source: https://www.imedpub.com/asian-journal-of-plant-science- research/editors.php last accessed 17.06.2020 Dr. Rainer Rees 02.04.2020 6 Example: Omics • Included on two predatory journals lists • Not indexed on legimitate journals list (Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)) • Well know for their «soliciting» mailings • 1st academic publisher to be sued by the U.S. -
Fraus Editorials En Ciències De La Salut 1
Fraus editorials en Ciències de la Salut Title ISSN ISSN Subject Publisher References Ayupharm: International Journal of Ayurveda and Allied Ayurpharm - International Journal of Ayurveda and Allied 2278-4772 Alternative Medicine (5) (8) Sciences Sciences International Ayurvedic Medical Journal (IAMJ) 2320-5091 Alternative Medicine (5) International Journal of Advanced Ayurveda and Alternative Medicine (6) Integrative Medicine International Journal of Advanced Ayurveda and Alternative Medicine (6) Naturopathy International Journal of Advanced Ayurveda Research Alternative Medicine (6) International Journal of Advanced Ayurveda, Yoga, 2320-0251 Alternative Medicine Cloud Publications (6) Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy International Journal of Advanced Ayurvedic and Herbal Alternative Medicine (6) Medicine International Journal of Advanced Homeopathy Alternative Medicine (6) International Journal of Advanced Unani Medicine Alternative Medicine (6) Journal of Ayurveda and Holistic Medicine 2321-1563 Alternative Medicine Atreya Ayurveda Publications (5) Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences 2456-3110 Alternative Medicine Charaka Publications Pvt. Ltd. (6) (5) Journal of Research in Human Anatomy and Embryology 2456-0731 Anatomy and Morphology Akshantala Enterprises (5) Journal of Research in Anaesthesology and Pain Medicine 2456-0685 Anesthesiology Akshantala Enterprises (5) Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2572-9292 Cardiology (5) (8) Experimental and Clinical Cardiology 1205-6626 1918-1515 Cardiology Pulsus Group / Cardiology -
Cahr 2014 Acrv 2014 Abstracts / Résumés
spring 2014 • volume 25 • supplement a The Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada Journal de l’Association pour la microbiologie médicale et l’infectiologie Canada CaHr 2014 turning tHe tiDe on Hiv 23rd Annual Canadian Conference on HIV/AIDS Research aCRV 2014 enDiguer les flots Du viH 23e Congrès annuel canadien de recherche sur le VIH/sida aBstraCts / résumés May 1 – 4, 2014 / Du 1er au 4 mai 2014 St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador St John’s, Terre-Neuve PM 40062595 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF PUBLISHER’S OFFICE JM Conly (Calgary) Publisher Robert B Kalina Vice-President Ann LeBlanc ASSOCIATE EDITORS F Diaz-Mitoma (Ottawa) – 2013 Virology EDITORIAL R Rennie (Edmonton) – 2015 Microbiology Managing Editor Brian Vukusic A Simor (Toronto) – 2015 Microbiology Associate Editors Emily Hayes Sara Miller McCutcheon L Johnston (Halifax) – 2015 Epidemiology John Weller G Taylor (Edmonton) – 2015 Epidemiology Production Manager Lynne Mumford JE Embree (Winnipeg) – 2015 Paediatrics Production Artist Lindsay Hermsen D Kunimoto (Edmonton) – 2013 Case Reports Editorial Coordinator Julie Pajuluoma G Evans (Kingston) – 2015 Case Reports SALES & MARKETING 905-829-4770 S Elsayed (London) – 2015 Case Reports S Kuhn (Calgary) – 2015 Travel Medicine Director of Advertising Diane Seguin ext 143 KL McClean (Saskatoon) – 2013 Case Reports Business Development Manager Markus Kalina Account Representative, Diana Greiss ext 145 R Read (Calgary) – 2014 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Subscriptions/Reprints/Classifieds S Shafran (Edmonton) -
Influence of Open Access Journals on the Research Community in Journal Citation Reports
pISSN 2288-8063 Sci Ed 2021;8(1):32-38 eISSN 2288-7474 https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.227 Original Article Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports Sang-Jun Kim1, Kay Sook Park2 Library, 1Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea Abstract Purpose: The number of open access (OA) journals is rapidly increasing, and it is very important for librarians to understand the influence of OA journals on the research com- munity. This study investigated the influence of the OA journals listed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) based on various indicators. Methods: The data for this study were prepared by combining the JCR 2014 to 2019 journal list with the number of hybrid OA articles obtained by searching the Web of Science. Each journal’s JCR indicators and article processing charge were added. The influence of OA jour- nals was compared according to OA type, whether they were published by large publishers, and whether they were top gold OA journals. Results: Gold OA journals remained weaker in terms of JCR indicators than hybrid journals. However, the top 20 gold OA journals, accounting for 27.0% of all OA articles in JCR 2014 to 2019, were superior in all JCR indicators. The top three OA publishers (MDPI, BioMed Central, and Public Library of Science) showed potential for development despite concerns regarding poor journals. The top three subscription publishers were very active in OA publishing, but their actual share of hybrid OA articles (Elsevier, 5.1%; Springer, 10.1%; and Wiley, 12.4% in JCR 2019) was still insufficient. -
Source Publication List for Web of Science
SOURCE PUBLICATION LIST FOR WEB OF SCIENCE SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED Updated July 2017 Journal Title Publisher ISSN E-ISSN Country Language 2D Materials IOP PUBLISHING LTD 2053-1583 2053-1583 ENGLAND English 3 Biotech SPRINGER HEIDELBERG 2190-572X 2190-5738 GERMANY English 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC 2329-7662 2329-7670 UNITED STATES English 4OR-A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research SPRINGER HEIDELBERG 1619-4500 1614-2411 GERMANY English AAPG BULLETIN AMER ASSOC PETROLEUM GEOLOGIST 0149-1423 1558-9153 UNITED STATES English AAPS Journal SPRINGER 1550-7416 1550-7416 UNITED STATES English AAPS PHARMSCITECH SPRINGER 1530-9932 1530-9932 UNITED STATES English AATCC Journal of Research AMER ASSOC TEXTILE CHEMISTS COLORISTS-AATCC 2330-5517 2330-5517 UNITED STATES English AATCC REVIEW AMER ASSOC TEXTILE CHEMISTS COLORISTS-AATCC 1532-8813 1532-8813 UNITED STATES English Abdominal Radiology SPRINGER 2366-004X 2366-0058 UNITED STATES English ABHANDLUNGEN AUS DEM MATHEMATISCHEN SEMINAR DER UNIVERSITAT HAMBURG SPRINGER HEIDELBERG 0025-5858 1865-8784 GERMANY German ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY AMER CHEMICAL SOC 0065-7727 UNITED STATES English Academic Pediatrics ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC 1876-2859 1876-2867 UNITED STATES English Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD 0898-9621 1545-5815 UNITED STATES English Acoustics Australia SPRINGER 1839-2571 1839-2571 AUSTRALIA English Acta Bioethica UNIV CHILE, CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO ESTUDIOS BIOETICA 1726-569X -
The Extent of South African Authored Articles in Predatory Journals
Research Article Page 1 of 9 The extent of South African authored articles in AUTHORS: predatory journals Johann Mouton1,2 Astrid Valentine1,2 We present a first estimate of the extent of predatory publishing amongst South African academics. This AFFILIATIONS: estimate is based on an analysis of all South African authored papers that qualified for subsidy over the 1 Centre for Research on period 2005 to 2014. The analysis shows that 4246 South African papers were published in 48 journals Evaluation, Science and Technology (CREST), which we re-classified (refining Beall’s classification) as either being probably or possibly predatory. A Stellenbosch University, breakdown of these papers by year shows that the greatest increase in predatory publishing has occurred Stellenbosch, South Africa since 2011. Results are also presented of the distribution of these papers by individual university and 2DST/NRF Centre of Excellence scientific field. We conclude with some suggestions about predatory publishing and its pervasive in Scientometrics and Science, consequence for our trust in science and how this should be addressed by the major stakeholders in the Technology and Innovation Policy, Stellenbosch University, South African higher education system. Stellenbosch, South Africa Significance: CORRESPONDENCE TO: • This study is the first to analyse the extent of predatory publishing in South Africa. Johann Mouton EMAIL: Introduction [email protected] The aim of this paper is to report on a study undertaken by CREST (Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology) to estimate the extent of predatory publishing amongst South African academics. A few South African DATES: studies and reports have appeared in recent years which have suggested that predatory publishing is not only Received: 11 Jan. -
Predatory Publishing in South Africa: Scale and Challenges J Mouton 26 June 2017 Abuse of Peer-Review in Predatory Publishing
Predatory publishing in South Africa: Scale and challenges J Mouton 26 June 2017 Abuse of peer-review in predatory publishing The demand to publish and to perform in highly competitive environments have led to different kinds of perverse consequences: salami publishing, increase in plagiarism and self-plagiarism and a host of unethical authorship practices (such as ghost authorship). Arguably one of the biggest threats to the integrity of the peer-review process, has been the advent of predatory publishing (and spin-offs such as predatory conferences, hijacked journals and so on). What is predatory publishing? The watchdog – Jeffrey Beall • Predatory journal are OA journals that exist for the sole purpose of profit • These predators generate profits by charging (excessive) author fees, also known as article processing charges (APCs. • These journals typically solicit manuscripts by spamming researchers (especially yahoo and gmail accounts) • These journals also typically have bizarrely broad or disjointed scopes and boast extremely rapid publication. https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/01/05/bealls-list-of-predatory- publishers-2016/ Criteria to identify predatory journals Category Standard publishing practice Predatory publishing Business model and Legitimate scholarly journals do not Predatory journal are OA journals that exist for Author Processing exist solely for profit and usually the sole purpose of profit. These journals very Charge’s (APC’s) charge reasonable APC’s often (not always) charge excessive) author fees for submission and publication Origin of papers Authors usually submit manuscripts Predatory journals typically solicit manuscripts by to journals out of their own accord spamming researchers (especially using their Yahoo and Gmail accounts) Journal titles Legitimate journals usually have Predatory journals often have bizarrely broad (e.g.