AGENDA February 9, 2015 – 9:00 A.M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mono County ¡Lanning Commission Agenda
MONO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO Box 347 PO Box 8 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Bridgeport, CA 93517 760.924.1800, fax 924.1801 760.932.5420, fax 932.5431 [email protected] www.monocounty.ca.gov AGENDA THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 2014 – 10 a.m. Supervisors Chambers, County Courthouse, Bridgeport *Videoconference: BOS Conference Room, third floor, Sierra Center Mall, Mammoth Lakes Full agenda packets, plus associated materials distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, will be available for public review at the Community Development offices in Bridgeport (Annex 1, 74 N. School St.) or Mammoth Lakes (Minaret Village Mall, above Giovanni’s restaurant). Agenda packets are also posted online at www.monocounty.ca.gov / boards & commissions / planning commission. For inclusion on the e- mail distribution list, interested persons can subscribe on the website. *Agenda sequence (see note following agenda). 1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PUBLIC COMMENT: Opportunity to address the Planning Commission on items not on the agenda 3. MEETING MINUTES: Review and adopt minutes of July 10, 2014 – p. 1 4. CONSENT ITEM 10:10 A.M. FINAL APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 13-001/ Hildenbrand-Booth. Approval of Parcel Map 13- 001 will divide APN 026-220-009, totaling 6.30 acres, into four lots of 2.39, 1.19, 1.19, and 1.43 acres, along with an offer of dedication of 0.10 acres along Valley Road. The project is located in the community of Chalfant. Access is via Valley Road, with a proposed private road, Owens Ranch Road. Individual wells and septic systems are proposed. -
Regional Transportation Plan
MONO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Mono County Local Transportation Commission Mono County Community Development Department Town of Mammoth Lakes Community Development Department MONO COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Fred Stump, Chair (Mono County) Shields Richardson, Vice-Chair (Mammoth Lakes) Jo Bacon (Mammoth Lakes) Tim Fesko (Mono County) Larry Johnston (Mono County) Sandy Hogan (Mammoth Lakes) STAFF Mono County Scott Burns, LTC Director Gerry Le Francois, Principal Planner Wendy Sugimura, Associate Analyst Jeff Walters, Public Works Director Garrett Higerd, Associate Engineer Courtney Weiche, Associate Planner C.D. Ritter, LTC Secretary Megan Mahaffey, Fiscal Analyst Town of Mammoth Lakes Haislip Hayes, Associate Civil Engineer Jamie Robertson, Assistant Engineer Caltrans District 9 Brent Green, District 9 Director Ryan Dermody, Deputy District 9 Director Planning, Modal Programs, and Local Assistance Denee Alcala, Transportation Planning Branch Supervisor Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) John Helm, Executive Director Jill Batchelder, Program Coordinator TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 Transportation Directives .......................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Needs and Issues .................................................................................................................. -
United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Proceedings of Workshop Xix Active Tectonic and Magmatic Processes Be
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROCEEDINGS OF WORKSHOP XIX ACTIVE TECTONIC AND MAGMATIC PROCESSES BENEATH LONG VALLEY CALDERA, EASTERN CALIFORNIA VOLUME I 24 - 27 January 1984 Sponsored by U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VOLCANO HAZARDS PROGRAM Editors and Convenors David P. Hill U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California 94025 Roy A. Bailey U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California 94025 Allan S. Ryall University of Nevada Reno, Nevada 89557-0018 OPEN-FILE REPORT 84-939 Compiled by Muriel Jacobson This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 1984 CONFERENCES TO DATE Conference I Abnormal Animal Behavior Prior to Earthquakes, I Not Open-Filed Conference II Experimental Studies of Rock Friction with Application to Earthquake Prediction Not Open-Filed Conference III Fault Mechanics and Its Relation to Earthquake Prediction Open-File No. 78-380 Conference IV Use of Volunteers in the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Open-File No. 78-336 Conference V Communicating Earthquake Hazard Reduction Information Open-File No. 78-933 Conference VI Methodology for Identifying Seismic Gaps and Soon-to-Break Gaps Open-File No. 78-943 Conference VII Stress and Strain Measurements Related to Earthquake Prediction Open-File No. 79-370 Conference VIII Analysis of Actual Fault Zones in Bedrock Open-File No. 79-1239 Conference IX Magnitude of Deviatoric Stresses in the Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle Open-File No. -
Mono County ¡Lanning Commission Agenda
MONO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO Box 347 PO Box 8 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Bridgeport, CA 93517 760.924.1800, fax 924.1801 760.932.5420, fax 932.5431 [email protected] www.monocounty.ca.gov AGENDA THURSDAY, JULY 9, 2015 – 10 a.m. Supervisors Chambers, County Courthouse, Bridgeport *Videoconference: Town/County Conference Room, Minaret Village Mall, Mammoth Lakes Full agenda packets, plus associated materials distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, will be available for public review at the Community Development offices in Bridgeport (Annex 1, 74 N. School St.) or Mammoth Lakes (Minaret Village Mall, above Giovanni’s restaurant). Agenda packets are also posted online at www.monocounty.ca.gov / boards & commissions / planning commission. For inclusion on the e- mail distribution list, interested persons can subscribe on the website. *Agenda sequence (see note following agenda). 1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PUBLIC COMMENT: Opportunity to address the Planning Commission on items not on the agenda 3. MEETING MINUTES: Review and adopt minutes of May 14, 2015 (no June meeting) – p.1 4. PUBLIC HEARING 10:10 A.M. USE PERMIT 15-003/Ohanas to allow for operation of a year-round mobile food trailer (8’ x 16’) on a parcel adjacent to the June Lake Brewery and General Store (APN 015-113-054) to sell retail food and beverages to the public. The project qualifies as a CEQA exemption. Staff: Courtney Weiche, associate planner – p.7 5. WORKSHOP: GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT. Staff: Gerry Le Francois, principal planner, and Wendy Sugimura, analyst – p.59 6. -
Examples of Active Faults in the Western United States: a Field Guide
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Examples of Active Faults in the Western United States: A Field Guide By Robert C. Bucknam and Kathleen M. Haller Open-File Report 89-528 Prepared in cooperation with the International Geological Correlation Program Project 206 ~ A Worldwide Comparison of the Characteristics of Major Active Faults Co-organizers: Robert C. Bucknam, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S A. Ding Guoyu, State Seismological Bureau, PRC Zhang Yuming, State Seismological Bureau, PRC This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado 1989 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 DAY 1--SANBRUNO TO PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA............................................ 2 Summary..................................................................................................... 2 Tectonic Setting of the San Andreas Fault.......................................................... 2 Historical Surface Faulting on the Central San AndreasFault................................ 5 San Francisco Earthquake of 1906.................................................................... 6 Segment 1A San Bruno to San Jose (43 Miles).................................................. 8 Stop l.l«San Andreas Rift................................................................. 9 Segment IB-San Jose to Hollister (43 Miles)................................................... -
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning On Hold N/A N/A Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California border south to Lake Isabella as well as lands in western Nevada. Sierra Nevada National Forests. R5 - Pacific Southwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:11/2017 12/2017 Nevia Brown National Forests Land DEIS NOA in Federal Register 7075629121 Management Plans Revision 05/27/2016 [email protected] EIS Est. -
Eastern Sierra Corridor Enhancement Program
Eastern Sierra Corridor Enhancement Program US 395 & SR 14 Corridors in Kern, Inyo, and Mono Counties February 4, 2010 Prepared For: Kern Council of Governments Inyo County Local Transportation Commission Mono County Local Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation • Prepared By: Design Workshop LSC Transportation Consultants Par- Sierra Business Council tic- Dynamic Competence CURES TABLECONTENTS OF CONTENTS CORRIDOR MANAGE M ENT .......................................................................................1 The Corridor ....................................................................................................................................... 1 The Opportunity – Why a Plan is Needed ............................................................................................ 3 Complete Streets .......................................................................................................................... 3 The Vision ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Results of Previous Visioning Efforts ............................................................................................ 4 Results of Corridor Planning Workshops ...................................................................................... 5 BA C KGROUND INVENTORY ......................................................................................7 Corridor History and Culture ............................................................................................................. -
Mammoth Area
Excerpt from Geologic Trips, Sierra Nevada by Ted Konigsmark ISBN 0-9661316-5-7 GeoPress All rights reserved. No part ofthis book may be reproduced without written permission, except for critical articles or reviews. For other geologic trips see: www.geologictrips.com 92 - Trip 2. MAMMOTH AREA Hot Creek Gorge Mono Lake Hilton Creek Fault Bishop Tuff Mammoth Mountain Lee Vining Earthquake Fault 120 Devils Postpile Minaret Summit M Inyo Craters o n 120 o C r 10 Miles a t e r s June Lake I n G y la o ss M C o r un a t ta e in r Long Valley Caldera s S ie r ra Resurgent Dome 203 Crowley 395 Lake Mammoth H i l Lakes t Toms Place o n C r e e Nevada k f Volcanic domes, a u l craters and flows t Fault - 93 Trip 2 MAMMOTH AREA Volcanoes, Domes and Craters The Mammoth area is one of the most volcanically active areas in the lower 48 States. From Bishop to Mono Lake, you are never out of sight of volcanoes, domes, craters, fumaroles, hot springs, and many different types of volcanic rocks, including rhyolite, andesite, basalt, obsidian, pumice, tuff, and welded tuff. During this trip, you’ll see examples of all of these volcanic features and volcanic rocks. Much of this volcanic activity is associated with the Long Valley Caldera, the remains of a huge volcano that erupted 760,000 years ago. Most of the remaining volcanic activity is associated with the Inyo and Mono Craters, a trend of domes and craters that extend from the Long Valley Caldera north to Mono Lake. -
Background to Prehistory of the Yuha Desert Region
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT .,~ .w.~ Californil DeMrt District The Prehistory and Management of Cultural Resources in the Red Mountain Area o BACKGROUND TO PREHISTORY OF THE EL PASO I RED MOUNTAIN DESERT REGION 8 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROTECTION AND STABILIZATION PLAN FOR THE SQUAW SPRING WELL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISTRICT NEAR RED MOUNTAIN, CALIFORNIA . cultural resource publications anthropology - history ~~~-------------~~~--~~--- Cover illustrations by Clara Stapp. Illustrator. Bureau of Land Management. California Desert District. Petroglyph design from Squaw Spring (SBr 2613). in Northwestern San Bernardino County. California. Forward This volume contains two working papers on the prehistory of the California Desert. The first paper entitled "Background to Prehistory of the El Paso/Red Mountain Desert Region" by Matthew C. Hall and James P. Barker et. al. is a reprint of the 1975 edition. It is the direct result of work undertaken as the result of an environmental analysis report prepared by the Bureau of Land Management for the leasing of geothermal resources in the Red Mountain vicinity. The detailed discussion of the prehistory of the area is extremely important to general prehistory of the Upper Mojave Desert. The second paper "An Archaeological Protection and Stabilization Plan for the Squaw Spring Well Archaeological District near Red Mountain, California" is authored by Russell 1. Kaldenberg and Jan Townsend following recom mendations made in the Red Mountain Geothermal Environmental AnalysiS Report which was greatly influenced by the Hall and Barker report cited above. This report is a logical sequence to the first and is a step by step method by which cultural resource specialists may affect the protection of cultural resources. -
PGS + Stanford GES-052Q Field Trip
PENINSULA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY + STANFORD GES-052Q Field Trip, Sierra Nevada, Owens Valley, and Central White-Inyo Range, Eastern California, June 1-3, 2002 Leaders W. G. Ernst and Mike Diggles (Owens Valley geology jobbed from Steve Lipshie) Saturday (DAY ONE) (0.0 mi) On Saturday, June 1, 8:30 am leave Geocorner and drive north on Junipero Sera, left at Alpine to I-280, northbound, to U. S. 92 (12.8 mi), then east over the San Mateo Bridge to I-880 northbound (30.5 mi) to I-238 eastbound (34.4 mi). WHEW! I-238 turns into I-580 (37.2 mi), so continue east on I-580 past Livermore and over Altamont Pass and a wind turbine farm to I-205 eastbound (66.0 mi), continuing to join with CA-120 (81.1 mi), a short stretch on I-5 (but stay on CA-120) to U. S. 99 northbound (87.2 mi), then quickly off at CA-108/CA-120 eastbound at Manteca (88.8 mi). From here we continue eastward through Oakdale (a good place to buy Chevron gas at 108.4 mi). Stay on CA-108 for Sonora Pass! Don’t turn right for Yosemite Park! At Knights Ferry we are well into the Mehrten Formation, an andesitic mudflow breccia (lahar) of Oligocene age. Its source was an andesitic volcanic arc deposited on the intensely eroded and peneplained Late Mesozoic Sierran calcalkaline volcanic- plutonic arc. Lots of breccia blocks of the lava were concentrated by erosion, and are sitting around on the surface, but fresh road cuts show only small-sized fragments; the maximum size of these breccia pieces increases as we head eastward toward the presumed source. -
Brown Ware Ceramics of the Prehistoric Owens Valley
Brown Ware Ceramics of the Prehistoric Owens Valley Wendy N. Pierce Abstract ethnic identities to its makers and users with any degree of confidence is difficult, and precise dating is The archaeological record of Owens Valley, east-central California, offers excellent opportunities to study hunter-gatherer pottery use. likewise daunting. However, analysis of this pottery Owens Valley Brown Ware (OVBW) pottery was used principally can provide valuable information about how OVBW to cook food. Utilitarian brown ware pottery in the valley first ceramics were made and how they were integrated appeared around AD 1300. Established gradually at first. mostly in into the subsistence systems and economies of their residential base camps, the ware became increasingly common at late prehistoric, short-term temporary workstations and permanent makers. According to Eerkens: villages. From the eve of European contact (ca. AD 1750) and into the early historic period (mid-1700s to mid-1800s), pottery was Western Great Basin pots are primarily an integral constituent of the Native tool kit. This paper discusses vessel shape, size, and wall thickness, as well as attributes of the cooking vessels used to boil seeds and nuts, raw materials for manufacturing OVBW pottery. It identifies the though roots, berries, and greens were occa- geographic and chronological changes that such pottery underwent sionally cooked as well. Meats seem to have within the Owens Valley and charts its distribution over space and time. Finally, this study considers the role of ceramics among the been only rarely processed in pots, likely area’s hunter-gatherers. as part of stews containing seeds and other plant products … There seems to be a fairly Introduction strong correlation between the introduction of intensive seed procurement, increased Utilitarian plain brown ware pottery of eastern Cali- milling activity, and pottery use. -
2019 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN I
MONO COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MONO COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONO COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2019 REGIONAL TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WORKS DEPARTMENT AMENDED 12/09/2019 PLAN MONO COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Fred Stump, Chair (Mono County) Lynda Salcido, Vice-Chair (Mammoth Lakes) John Wentworth (Mammoth Lakes) John Peters (Mono County) Jennifer Kreitz (Mono County) Sandy Hogan (Mammoth Lakes) STAFF Mono County Wendy Sugimura, Community Development Director Gerry Le Francois, LTC Co-Executive Director/Principal Planner Hailey Lang, Planning Analyst Tony Dublino, Public Works Director Garrett Higerd, Associate Engineer C.D. Ritter, LTC Secretary Megan Mahaffey, Fiscal Analyst Town of Mammoth Lakes Haislip Hayes, Associate Civil Engineer Grady Dutton, LTC Co-Executive Director Caltrans District 9 Brent Green, District 9 Director Ryan Dermody, Deputy District 9 Director Planning, Modal Programs, and Local Assistance Mark Heckman, Transportation Planning Branch Supervisor Austin West, Transportation Planner Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) Phil Moores, Executive Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS MONO COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ............................................................................ COMMISSIONERS .....................................................................................................................i STAFF ................................................................................................................................