DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning On Hold N/A N/A Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California border south to Lake Isabella as well as lands in western Nevada. Sierra Nevada National Forests. R5 - Pacific Southwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:11/2017 12/2017 Nevia Brown National Forests Land DEIS NOA in Federal Register 7075629121 Management Plans Revision 05/27/2016 [email protected] EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal *UPDATED* Register 11/2017 Description: The Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests propose to revise their land management plans as guided by the 2012 Planning Rule Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=3375 Location: UNIT - Sequoia National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Mono, Tulare, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Entire Inyo National Forest, entire Sequoia National Forest outside of the Giant Sequoia National Monument, and the Sierra National Forest. 04/01/2017 05:56 am MT Page 1 of 15 Inyo National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R5 - Pacific Southwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Mammoth Base Area Land - Land ownership management In Progress: Expected:09/2018 09/2018 Janelle Walker Exchange NOI in Federal Register 760-924-5523 EIS 08/23/2016 [email protected] *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 05/2017 Description: Exchange of approximately 30.6 acres of National Forest System land, currently under special use authorization to Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, located near the Main Lodge north of Highway 203 for approximately 1317.5 acres of land in California. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=30428 Location: UNIT - Mammoth Ranger District, White Mountain Ranger District, Mt. Hough Ranger District, Mi-Wok Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Inyo, Mono, Plumas, Tuolumne. LEGAL - Land to be exchanged is located in T.3S, R. 27E., Sec 30, MDM. Proposal includes the addition of non-federal parcels to the Inyo, Plumas, and Stanislaus National Forests in California. The area near Main Lodge, Mammoth Mountain Ski Area would be exchanged for up to 12 non Federal parcels in Inyo, Mono, Plumas and Tuolumne Counties. Inyo National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Closure of Sierra Nevada - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants On Hold N/A N/A Kary Schlick Bighorn Sheep Habitat to Pack 760-873-2450 Goat Use [email protected] EA Description: This project will address potential disease transmission from pack goat use on the endangered Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. This project is a continuation of a previous closure which has expired. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=40094 Location: UNIT - Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Inyo, Mono. LEGAL - Not Applicable. The project includes the 11 SNBS herd units located on the Inyo NF. 04/01/2017 05:56 am MT Page 2 of 15 Inyo National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Inyo National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Communication Site Special - Special use management Completed Actual: 01/25/2017 03/2017 Sheila Irons Use Permit Renewal 760-924-5534 CE [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: Reissuing special use permits for up to 12 communication sites throughout the Inyo National Forest, for a period of up to 30 years. Facilities include radio and cell phone towers, radio repeaters, and other communications equipment. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=49815 Location: UNIT - Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Inyo, Mono. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Silver Peak, Casa Diablo, Sherwin Summit, Mazourka Canyon, South Benton, Milner Peak, Wilfred Canyon, Mustang, Poleta, McGee, Little Antelope and Glass Mountain. Eradication and Control of - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:06/2018 08/2018 Michele Slaton Invasive Plants on the Inyo (other than forest products) Scoping Start 08/19/2016 760-873-2440 National Forest Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] EA Notice 12/2017 Description: Implement integrated plant management to control and eradicate non-native invasive plant infestations on the Inyo National Forest. To comment, click on "comment" on the right side of this page or email to comments- [email protected] Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=38912 Location: UNIT - Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mono, Tulare, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Forestwide. Issuance of 10 Year Priority Use - Special use management On Hold N/A N/A Jon Kazmierski Outfitter/Guide Fishing Permits 760-924-5503 CE [email protected] Description: Trips to: Lee Vining Cr., June Lake Loop, Big Springs, Deadman Cr., Mammoth Lakes Basin, Middle Fork San Joaquin, Sotcher Lake, Starkweather Lake, Hot Creek, Convict Lake, McGee Cr., Rock Cr., Rock Cr. Lake, Pine Cr., Bishop Cr., No. Lk., So. Lk. Location: UNIT - Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California. COUNTY - Inyo, Madera, Mono. LEGAL - Not Applicable. See Project Description. 04/01/2017 05:56 am MT Page 3 of 15 Inyo National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Inyo National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region Land and Resource - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:02/2018 03/2018 Debra Schweizer Management Plan Revision DEIS NOA in Federal Register 760-873-2427 EIS 05/27/2016 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal d.us Register 01/2018 Description: Revision of the 1988 Inyo National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan under the provisions of the 2012 National Forest System Planning Rule. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/inyo/landmanagement/planning Location: UNIT - Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mono, Tulare, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Forestwide. Inyo National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R5 - Pacific Southwest Region ECV Monument Special Use - Special use management In Progress: Expected:07/2017 08/2017 Carmen John Permit Renewal Scoping Start 12/07/2016 760-873-2510 CE [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: Issue a new permit to the Slim Princess Chapter of E. Clampus Vitus authorizing five historical markers located at various locations on the south zone Inyo National Forest. New permit term will be for 10 years. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=50842 Location: UNIT - White Mountain Ranger District, Mount Whitney Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Inyo. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Buttermilk Road near junction of Hwy 168; Parcher's Resort, South Fork Bishop Creek; Cardinal Gold Mine, Bishop Creek; Hwy 395 20 North of Bishop Sherwin Grade; Intake 2, Bishop Creek. Three Creeks Jeffrey Pine - Forest products In Progress: Expected:08/2017 09/2017 Scott Kusumoto Forest Health & Restoration - Vegetation management Comment Period Public Notice 760-924-5522 Project (other than forest products) 03/22/2016 [email protected] EA - Fuels management *UPDATED* - Watershed management Description: The Three Creeks Jeffrey Pine Forest Health & Restoration project objective is to provide for healthy forest conditions, promote establishment of old growth and reintroduce fire to the ecosystem. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=37712 Location: UNIT - Mammoth Ranger District, Mono Ranger District. STATE - California. COUNTY - Mono. LEGAL - Not Applicable. All proposed treatment units lie within the Mono Lake and Mammoth Ranger Districts of the Inyo National
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Long Valley Caldera, Mono-Inyo Craters

    Geologic Map of the Long Valley Caldera, Mono-Inyo Craters

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-1933 US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF LONG VALLEY CALDERA, MONO-INYO CRATERS VOLCANIC CHAIN, AND VICINITY, EASTERN CALIFORNIA By Roy A. Bailey GEOLOGIC SETTING VOLCANISM Long Valley caldera and the Mono-Inyo Craters Long Valley caldera volcanic chain compose a late Tertiary to Quaternary Volcanism in the Long Valley area (Bailey and others, volcanic complex on the west edge of the Basin and 1976; Bailey, 1982b) began about 3.6 Ma with Range Province at the base of the Sierra Nevada frontal widespread eruption of trachybasaltic-trachyandesitic fault escarpment. The caldera, an east-west-elongate, lavas on a moderately well dissected upland surface oval depression 17 by 32 km, is located just northwest (Huber, 1981).Erosional remnants of these mafic lavas of the northern end of the Owens Valley rift and forms are scattered over a 4,000-km2 area extending from the a reentrant or offset in the Sierran escarpment, Adobe Hills (5-10 km notheast of the map area), commonly referred to as the "Mammoth embayment.'? around the periphery of Long Valley caldera, and The Mono-Inyo Craters volcanic chain forms a north- southwestward into the High Sierra. Although these trending zone of volcanic vents extending 45 km from lavas never formed a continuous cover over this region, the west moat of the caldera to Mono Lake. The their wide distribution suggests an extensive mantle prevolcanic basement in the area is mainly Mesozoic source for these initial mafic eruptions. Between 3.0 granitic rock of the Sierra Nevada batholith and and 2.5 Ma quartz-latite domes and flows erupted near Paleozoic metasedimentary and Mesozoic metavolcanic the north and northwest rims of the present caldera, at rocks of the Mount Morrisen, Gull Lake, and Ritter and near Bald Mountain and on San Joaquin Ridge Range roof pendants (map A).
  • Inyo National Forest Visitor Guide

    Inyo National Forest Visitor Guide

    >>> >>> Inyo National Forest >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Visitor Guide >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> $1.00 Suggested Donation FRED RICHTER Inspiring Destinations © Inyo National Forest Facts “Inyo” is a Paiute xtending 165 miles Bound ary Peak, South Si er ra, lakes and 1,100 miles of streams Indian word meaning along the California/ White Mountain, and Owens River that provide habitat for golden, ENevada border between Headwaters wildernesses. Devils brook, brown and rainbow trout. “Dwelling Place of Los Angeles and Reno, the Inyo Postpile Nation al Mon ument, Mam moth Mountain Ski Area National Forest, established May ad min is tered by the National Park becomes a sum mer destination for the Great Spirit.” 25, 1907, in cludes over two million Ser vice, is also located within the mountain bike en thu si asts as they acres of pris tine lakes, fragile Inyo Na tion al For est in the Reds ride the chal leng ing Ka mi ka ze Contents Trail from the top of the 11,053-foot mead ows, wind ing streams, rugged Mead ow area west of Mam moth Wildlife 2 Sierra Ne va da peaks and arid Great Lakes. In addition, the Inyo is home high Mam moth Moun tain or one of Basin moun tains. El e va tions range to the tallest peak in the low er 48 the many other trails that transect Wildflowers 3 from 3,900 to 14,494 feet, pro vid­ states, Mt. Whitney (14,494 feet) the front coun try of the forest. Wilderness 4-5 ing diverse habitats that sup port and is adjacent to the lowest point Sixty-five trailheads provide Regional Map - North 6 vegetation patterns ranging from in North America at Badwater in ac cess to over 1,200 miles of trail Mono Lake 7 semiarid deserts to high al pine Death Val ley Nation al Park (282 in the 1.2 million acres of wil der- meadows.
  • Motorized Travel Management

    Motorized Travel Management

    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Forest Impact Statement Service Pacific Southwest Record of Decision Region R5-MB-198a Inyo National Forest August 2009 Motorized Travel Management Bishop Focus Area Inyo National Forest Motorized Travel Management Record of Decision Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor Inyo National Forest 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 200 Bishop, CA 93514 For Further Information Contact: Susan Joyce, Forest Planner Inyo National Forest 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 200 Bishop, CA 93514 (760) 873-2516 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Record of Decision – August 2009 Table of Contents
  • Mono County ¡Lanning Commission Agenda

    Mono County ¡Lanning Commission Agenda

    MONO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PO Box 347 PO Box 8 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Bridgeport, CA 93517 760.924.1800, fax 924.1801 760.932.5420, fax 932.5431 [email protected] www.monocounty.ca.gov AGENDA THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 2014 – 10 a.m. Supervisors Chambers, County Courthouse, Bridgeport *Videoconference: BOS Conference Room, third floor, Sierra Center Mall, Mammoth Lakes Full agenda packets, plus associated materials distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, will be available for public review at the Community Development offices in Bridgeport (Annex 1, 74 N. School St.) or Mammoth Lakes (Minaret Village Mall, above Giovanni’s restaurant). Agenda packets are also posted online at www.monocounty.ca.gov / boards & commissions / planning commission. For inclusion on the e- mail distribution list, interested persons can subscribe on the website. *Agenda sequence (see note following agenda). 1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PUBLIC COMMENT: Opportunity to address the Planning Commission on items not on the agenda 3. MEETING MINUTES: Review and adopt minutes of July 10, 2014 – p. 1 4. CONSENT ITEM 10:10 A.M. FINAL APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 13-001/ Hildenbrand-Booth. Approval of Parcel Map 13- 001 will divide APN 026-220-009, totaling 6.30 acres, into four lots of 2.39, 1.19, 1.19, and 1.43 acres, along with an offer of dedication of 0.10 acres along Valley Road. The project is located in the community of Chalfant. Access is via Valley Road, with a proposed private road, Owens Ranch Road. Individual wells and septic systems are proposed.
  • Short Range Transit Plan – 2009 (PDF)

    Short Range Transit Plan – 2009 (PDF)

    Eastern Sierra Transit Authority Short Range Transit Plan Volume 1 Service and Financial Plan Final Report January 2009 Eastern Sierra Transit Authority Short Range Transit Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................... ES-1 Short Range Transit Plan Objectives ....................................................................... ES-1 Overview of Existing Services.................................................................................... ES-1 Transit Needs .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Transit Dependent Population ...........................................................................ES-1 Tourist and Visitor Market ................................................................................ES-2 Seamless Transit System ...................................................................................ES-3 ESTA Mission, Goals and Performance Standards................................................. ES-3 395 Corridor Services................................................................................................. ES-4 Rural Transit Services................................................................................................ ES-5 Bishop Local Services................................................................................................. ES-6 Mammoth Local Services..........................................................................................
  • "Ground Water in White River Valley, White Pine, Nye, and Lincoln

    "Ground Water in White River Valley, White Pine, Nye, and Lincoln

    STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN No. 8 GROUND WATER IN WHITE RIVER VALLEY, WHITE PINE, NYE, AND LINCOLN COUNTIES, NEVADA By G. B. MAXEY and T. E. EAKIN Prepared in cooperation with the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey 1 949 CARSON CITY. NEVADA STATE PRINTING OFFICE JACK MCCARTHY. SUPERINTENDENT 1930 CONTENTS PAGE Foreword ............................................... 5 Abstract ............................................... 7 Introduction .............................................. 9 Location and general features .............................. 12 Drainage ................................................ 14 Climate ................................................ 18 Precipitation ................................................ 18 Temperature ................................................ 19 Vegetation ............................................... 25 Geology and water-bearing characteristics of the rocks . 26 General relations . .............. 26 Older sedimentary and igneous rocks . ............................................. 26 MCCARTHY. SUPERINTENDENT Tertiary and Quaternary alluvial and lacustrine deposits ..... 29 Ground water ................................................ 33 Occurrence ............................................... 33 Springs ............................................... 35 Source and amount of recharge . ............. 40 Movement ............................................... 41 Discharge ...............................................
  • FIELD TRIP DAY ONE Birch Creek, White Mountains, California

    FIELD TRIP DAY ONE Birch Creek, White Mountains, California

    FIELD TRIP DAY ONE Birch Creek, White Mountains, California MARK D. BARTON† Center for Mineral Resources, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 Introduction Climbing toward the ridgeline the road passes down section THIS PAPER provides the log for the first full day of the field through folded and faulted exposures of Harkless (shale), Po- trip. Day 1 will be spent in the Birch Creek area, east of leta (mixed carbonate and shale), and Campito (sandstone) Bishop in the southeastern White Mountains. There are sev- Formations. These units are present in the distal part of the eral goals to the Birch Creek day: Birch Creek system where they locally host small quartz-base metal replacements and veins. A few of these deposits pro- 1. To see one of the best-exposed examples of a Cretaceous duced modest amounts of lead, zinc, silver and gold in the two-mica granite pluton in the Great Basin with its distinctive late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. style of emplacement and hydrothermal alteration; 2. To examine the relationships among magmatism, struc- STOP 1—Westgard Pass tural development, and emplacement; Purpose: overview of the Birch Creek district from south. 3. To examine the links between magmatism and hydro- Stop near the summit of Westgard Pass, 100 m southwest thermal activity; of the entrance to Cedar Flat group campground (11.9 miles 4. To ask the questions: Why are these Late Cretaceous from Big Pine). From here look north parallel to the road systems in the Great Basin not well mineralized? What differs along the axis of the White Mountains antiform.
  • Chapter 06 Fisheries & Aquatic Resources.Pdf

    Chapter 06 Fisheries & Aquatic Resources.Pdf

    CHAPTER 6 Fisheries and Aquatic Resources CHAPTER 6 FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCES This chapter describes the existing fisheries and aquatic resources conditions, the applicable regulations, and potential impacts from implementation of the Proposed Project Alternative and other alternatives on the fisheries and aquatic resources in the Project Area. 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section describes the environmental setting related to fisheries and aquatic resources that may be influenced by implementation of the Proposed Project Alternative or other alternatives in the Project Area including Lake Mary, Mammoth Creek extending from Lake Mary to its confluence with Hot Creek, and Hot Creek from its confluence with Mammoth Creek downstream to the USGS Hot Creek Flume Gage. 6.1.1 LAKE MARY Lake Mary is a cirque lake (a deep, steep-walled basin on a mountain) formed by the filling of remnant moraine depressions left by receding glaciers (USGS 1999). Lake Mary contains prominent granite features, and cold, clear water, making it a popular angling destination. A "fishing enhancement" program is implemented by both the Town of Mammoth Lakes and CDFG to maintain the lake’s appeal as a “trophy” trout destination. The recreational fishery in Lake Mary is maintained by both the Town of Mammoth Lakes and CDFG because of its economic importance to the Mammoth Lakes Basin (Mammoth City Concierge 2010). Lake Mary has been, and continues to be managed as a put-and-take recreational fishery. Hatchery rainbow trout have been regularly planted by CDFG beginning in the late spring and extending through the summer. The lake also is often planted with “Alpers trout.” The Alpers trout is a genetic hybrid of rainbow trout, Kamloops trout and steelhead, raised in the streams and ponds of Alpers Owens River Ranch.
  • 1999 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Bruneau Hot-Spring

    1999 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Bruneau Hot-Spring

    1999 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Bruneau Hot-spring Springsnail (Pyrgulopsis bruneauensis) by Cary D. Myler and G. Wayne Minshall Stream Ecology Center Department of Biological Sciences Idaho State University Pocatello, Idaho 83209 Prepared for U.S. Bureau of Land Management Lower Snake River District Boise, ID 83709 January 2000 T ABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Appendices ............................................................................................................ iii Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 3 Site Description ............................................................................................................ 3 Springsnail Size Distribution ......................................................................................... 5 Springsnail Population Fluctuations ............................................................................. 5 Discharge, Temperature, and Water
  • Regional Transportation Plan

    Regional Transportation Plan

    MONO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Mono County Local Transportation Commission Mono County Community Development Department Town of Mammoth Lakes Community Development Department MONO COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Fred Stump, Chair (Mono County) Shields Richardson, Vice-Chair (Mammoth Lakes) Jo Bacon (Mammoth Lakes) Tim Fesko (Mono County) Larry Johnston (Mono County) Sandy Hogan (Mammoth Lakes) STAFF Mono County Scott Burns, LTC Director Gerry Le Francois, Principal Planner Wendy Sugimura, Associate Analyst Jeff Walters, Public Works Director Garrett Higerd, Associate Engineer Courtney Weiche, Associate Planner C.D. Ritter, LTC Secretary Megan Mahaffey, Fiscal Analyst Town of Mammoth Lakes Haislip Hayes, Associate Civil Engineer Jamie Robertson, Assistant Engineer Caltrans District 9 Brent Green, District 9 Director Ryan Dermody, Deputy District 9 Director Planning, Modal Programs, and Local Assistance Denee Alcala, Transportation Planning Branch Supervisor Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) John Helm, Executive Director Jill Batchelder, Program Coordinator TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 Transportation Directives .......................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Needs and Issues ..................................................................................................................
  • Guidebook for Field Trip to Precambrian-Cam8ri An

    Guidebook for Field Trip to Precambrian-Cam8ri An

    GUIDEBOOK FOR FIELD TRIP TO PRECAMBRIAN-CAM8RI AN SUCCESSION WHITE-INYO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA By C. A. Nelson and J. Wyatt Durham Thursday-Sunday, November 17-20, 1966 CONTENTS .°age General Introduction 1 Road log and trip guide . 1 Figure 1. - Columnar section, following page, .... 1 Figure 2. - Reed Flat map, following page ...... 5 Figure 3. - Cedar Flat map, following page 12 Fossil Plates, following page ... 15 General Index map - "The Bristlecone Pine Recreation Area," USFS unbound Geologic Map of the Blanco Mountain Quadrangle, Inyo and Mono Counties, California, USGS GQ-529 unbound GENERAL INTRODUCTION In addition to the Precambrian and Cambrian strata to be seen, the White-Inyo region and its environs affords a wide variety of geo- logic features. Although we will concentrate on the principal objectives of the trip, we will have the opportunity to observe many features of the structure, geomorpnology, and Cenozoic history of the region as well. Travel will be by bus from San Francisco to Bishop, California on Thursday, November 17. For this segment of the trip, and the re- turn to San Francisco from Bishop, no guidebook has been prepared. We are fortunate, however, to have Mr. Bennie Troxel of the Cali- fornia Division of Mines and Geology with us.. Together we will try to provide you with some of the highlights of the trans-Sierran route. Field gear, including sturdy shoes and warm clothing is essential. Stops at the higher elevations are likely to be cold ones. As is true of all too many field trips, especially those using bus transportation, many of the best localities for collecting Cambrian fossils and for viewing features of the Precambrian and Cambrian succession are in areas too remote or too inaccessible to be visited.
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Proceedings of Workshop Xix Active Tectonic and Magmatic Processes Be

    United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Proceedings of Workshop Xix Active Tectonic and Magmatic Processes Be

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROCEEDINGS OF WORKSHOP XIX ACTIVE TECTONIC AND MAGMATIC PROCESSES BENEATH LONG VALLEY CALDERA, EASTERN CALIFORNIA VOLUME I 24 - 27 January 1984 Sponsored by U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VOLCANO HAZARDS PROGRAM Editors and Convenors David P. Hill U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California 94025 Roy A. Bailey U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California 94025 Allan S. Ryall University of Nevada Reno, Nevada 89557-0018 OPEN-FILE REPORT 84-939 Compiled by Muriel Jacobson This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 1984 CONFERENCES TO DATE Conference I Abnormal Animal Behavior Prior to Earthquakes, I Not Open-Filed Conference II Experimental Studies of Rock Friction with Application to Earthquake Prediction Not Open-Filed Conference III Fault Mechanics and Its Relation to Earthquake Prediction Open-File No. 78-380 Conference IV Use of Volunteers in the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Open-File No. 78-336 Conference V Communicating Earthquake Hazard Reduction Information Open-File No. 78-933 Conference VI Methodology for Identifying Seismic Gaps and Soon-to-Break Gaps Open-File No. 78-943 Conference VII Stress and Strain Measurements Related to Earthquake Prediction Open-File No. 79-370 Conference VIII Analysis of Actual Fault Zones in Bedrock Open-File No. 79-1239 Conference IX Magnitude of Deviatoric Stresses in the Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle Open-File No.