DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R Cambridge University Press 0521520665 - Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R. Pauketat Index More information Index abandonment, 11 Bennett, John, 18 Adair, James, 14, 49, 63 Big Bang, 65, 126 Adams, Robert, 18, 57, 100 bison, 35, 36, 37 adaptationism, 23, 43, 68 Black, Glenn, 18 Adena burial mounds, 7 Blackhawk, 16 adze blades, Dalton, 36 Blanton, Richard, 179 Africa, 3 bodies, 145. See also men, women agency, 24, 163. See also practices Bodmer, Karl, 15 agriculture, 38 bow and arrow, 8, 52 Algonkians, 43, 156 Brackenridge, Henry, 15, 17, 37, 73, 163, Alt, Susan, 99, 100, 109, 180 174 American Bottom, 9, 26, 31, 33, 37 Braden style, 6 tree clearance, 41 Bradley site, 159 Angel site, 11, 138 Brown, James, 6, 141, 144 Apalachee, 162 Brumfiel, Elizabeth, 179 Apple River, 127 Bureau of American Ethnology, 16, archaeomagnetism, 5 104 Archaic period, 6 Butler, Brian, 139 arrowheads, 10, 91, 104, 172 Cahokia-style, 113, 124, 125, 129, 137, Caddoans, 43, 72, 133, 156, 173 170 Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site, 69 foreign, 113, 120 Cairo Lowlands phase, 155 lodged in rib cage, 92 Calumet ceremony, 116 axe heads, 41, 84, 100–1, 121 Cambria phase, 125, 131 ceremonial, 149 Carneiro, Robert, 178 manufacturing, 101 Castile Landing, 160 traded north, 125 Central Lowlands, 30, 31 Aztalan, 16, 17, 121, 129, 174 central political-administrative complex, controlling the gaze, 181 71, 106, 164, 166. See also East St. Louis, St. Louis Bareis, Charles, 19, 21, 176 ceremonial center, 3, 8 Barker, Alex, 132 Chapman, Carl, 18 Barrett, Samuel, 17, 129, 178–9 Chav´ınde Huantar, 4 Bartram, William, 14, 63 Cherry Valley phase, 133 beaded burial, 88, 111, 115. See also chert, 32, 33 Mound 8 Chichen Itz´a,72 beads, 84, 91, 100, 120, 129, 170, 172. See Chickasaw, 44, 143 also shell chiefdom, 3, 4, 51, 125, 161, 167, 168 Beckwith’s Fort, 134, 155 children, 157 Bell, Robert, 18 China, 3, 4, 167 Beloit College, 181 Chiwere-Siouans, 154 Benn, David, 52, 128 Choctaw, 43, 49, 63 212 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521520665 - Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R. Pauketat Index More information Index213 chunkey, 63, 86, 109, 111, 115, 132, 145 diaspora, 24, 153 Cahokia-style stones, 121, 124, 125, Diaz-Granados, Carol, 118 129, 131, 137, 160 Dickson Mounds, 126 stone, 10, 23, 49, 63, 64, 65, 170, 179 direct-historical approach, 23 stones in Mound #72, 91 displacement, 10, 11, 24 city, 3, 4 Dobbs, Clark, 125 city-state, 4 dog, 35 Civil War, 16, 176 drought, 41, 152 civilization, 1, 4, 167, 173 dugouts, 36 Clark, George Rogers, 14 Dunbar, William, 14 Clark, William, 14, 181 Duncan, James, 118 cloth, 84 Cobb, Charles, 104, 139 earspools, 128 Cole, Fay Cooper, 18 earthquake, New Madrid, 71, 152 Coles Creek, 8, 49–51, 66, 113, 133 East St. Louis site, 15, 16, 19, 71–4, 150, plazas, 50 163, 165 transition to Plaquemine, 139 palisade, 149 Collins, James, 100 and public works, 86, 147 Collins site, 125 and settlement hierarchy, 96 community, 4, 107–8 storage buildings, 105 identity, 155 Effigy Mound Culture, 8, 53, 116, 127 imagined, 47 Egypt, 69 Confederacy, 16 Emerald site, 87, 97, 150 confederation, 170 Emergent Mississippian, 9, 67 conflagration, 131, 171 avoidance of concept, 67 East St. Louis site, 149, 152 Emerson, Thomas, 6, 21, 55, 132, 156, Eveland site, 126 177, 178, 181 Rench site, 126 emigration, 125 Union Bench site, 128 replacement hypothesis, 97–9 Conrad, Lawrence, 21, 156, 176 Engelke, Georgia, 28 Coosa, 162 environmental factors, 44, 151 copper, 35, 51, 57, 83, 91, 92, 121, 126, Eridu, 4 128, 172 ethnoscape, 42, 44 earpieces, 133 Etowah, 115 corporeality, 22, 152, 163, 165 Eveland site, 126, 156 costumes, 36 evolutionism, neo-, 68 courtyard, 61, 62, 63, 64, 79 execution, 91–2. See also men, Mound elimination of, 94, 109 #72, women craft goods, 85, 101 Creek, 16, 174. See also Muskogee FAI-270, 21, 22, 164, 177 crop yields, 41 excavation ideology, 181 Crow Creek site, 156 Fairbanks, Charles, 18 Cuicuilco, 166 farmsteads, 96–9, 150, 156, 163, 164, cult, 112, 114, 171 169 Cahokian, 119, 143, 145, 156 nodal, 99 see also Red Horn feasting, 37, 51, 59–60, 85, 86 culture areas, 43 implications, 165 culture making, 48 large-scale, 106 cypress, 5, 37, 85 Finney, Fred, 128 First Nations, 3, 154 Dalan, Rinita, 76 flintclay, 32, 128 DeBoer, Warren, 86 figurines, 11, 110, 132, 133, 144, 170, deer, white-tailed, 36, 85 180 dendrochronology, 5, 12 floodplain, 9 Dhegiha-Siouans, 154 Ford, James, 18 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521520665 - Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R. Pauketat Index More information 214 Index Fortier, Andrew, 21, 55 hoe blades, 10, 35, 103, 104, 129 Fowler, Melvin, 19, 57, 72, 166, 181 distribution, 180 Fred Edwards site, 128 industry, 11 Freeman, Thomas, 14 see also Mill Creek chert French Colonial period, 14, 33 Hoecake site, 56, 57, 133, 171 French Fork Incised, 58 Holder, Preston, 18, 19, 87 homesteads. See farmsteads Gahagan site, 133 hooded bottles, 136 galena, 30, 32, 33, 100, 126, 149, 180 Holmes, William, 178 gaze, 49, 181 Hopewell culture, 7. See also Woodland gender, 100, 108, 110 period and Southeastern Ceremonial Complex, Hopgood, James, 57 144 horizon marker, 5–6, 7, 10. See also Ghana, 4 Long-Nosed God Gibbon, Guy, 125 Horseshoe Lake site, 87, 97 Glenwood complex, 125 House, John, 133 Goggin, John, 114 households, 148 Gottschall Rock Shelter, 116, 118, 131, houses, 79. See also wall trench 154 architecture government, 4 Huasteca, 72 Grand Plaza, 69, 77–8, 84, 85, 92 relationship to mounds, 94 identity, 108, 155 and Mound #72, 91 ideology, 13, 152, 162 Great Mortuary. See Spiro and community, 107–8 Great Oasis, 125 Illinois Basin, 30 Great Zimbabwe, 4 Illinois Country, 33 Green, William, 52 Illinois River, 31 Green Corn Ceremony, 144 inalienability, 49, 64, 84, 87, 121 grid, Cahokian, 80. See also master plan Interior Low Plateau, 30 Griffin, James, 18, 19, 21, 22, 158, intrusion, 120, 127. See also Aztalan 177 Ioway, 154 Grossmann site, 165, 180 Gulf Coast Tradition, 47 Jackson, Andrew, 3, 16 Jefferson, Thomas, 3, 14, 15 Hale site, 104 letter from Brackenridge, 174 Hall, Robert, 72, 115, 116, 118, 178 Louisiana Purchase, 33 Halliday site, 62, 65, 100 and the Osage, 181 Harlan site, 133 John Chapman site, 127, 128 Harn, Alan, 126 Hartley Fort site, 128 Kansa, 154 hegemony, 109, 145, 165, 168 Kaskaskia River, 99 hematite, 32 Kelly, Arthur, 18 Henning, Dale, 100, 181 Kelly, John, 21, 62, 65, 150 Hernando de Soto, 1, 5, 14, 158, Kelly, Lucretia, 180 173 Kersey site, 58 heterarchy, 55, 75, 155, 162, 165, 166, Kincaid site, 11, 12, 57, 119, 121, 137–9, 172 143, 155, 171, 174, 181 of central complex, 168 kingdom, 4, 125 hierarchical solidarity, 110 Kneberg, Madeline, 18 hill forts, 8 Knight, V. James, 65, 141 historical disjuncture, 67, 96 Knoebel site, 105 historical event, 5 Koldehoff, Brad, 41, 83, 104, 180 historical processualism, 24, 68 Hixton sandstone, 35, 121, 127, La Moine River polities. See Spoon River 128 Mississippian Ho-Chunk, 154 labor, 95, 165 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521520665 - Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R. Pauketat Index More information Index215 Lake George site, 12, 119, 121, 139, 143, Milanich, Jerald, 179 155 Mill Creek chert, 10, 35, 83, 128, 149. See Lake Providence site, 133 also hoe blades landscape, 145 Mill Creek phase, 125 inscription of, 114, 176, 177 Millhouse, Phillip, 178 theories of, 151, 163 Milner, George, 21, 68, 106, 178, 180, Langkford, George, 141 181 Le Page du Pratz, Simone, 63 minimalism, 68, 164, 176 Lee, Robert E., 15 Mississippi Alluvial Plain, 30 Lewis, Barry, 57, 133 Mississippi flyway, 37 Lewis, Meriwether, 14 Mississippi River, 5, 26 Lilbourn site, 134 floodplain, 42 Linn-Helig site, 104 flood stage, 26 Little Ice Age, 28, 37 Mississippian culture, 1, 8, 178 Lohmann phase, 11 Mississippianization, 11 Lohmann site, 97 Mississippians, 1 Long, Stephen, 15, 174, 178 Missouri Indians, 26, 154 Long-Nosed God, 73, 170, 172 Missouri River, 31 earpieces, 116, 118, 121, 125, 131, 133 Mitchell site, 15, 17, 19, 74, 87, 150 Horizon, 11, 114, 145 palisade, 149 Ludwickson, John, 125 and settlement hierarchy, 97 Moche, 169, 170 McCorvie, Mary, 143 Monks Mound, 67, 71, 77, 84, 95, 152, McElrath, Dale, 21, 55 164 Macon Plateau, 155. See also Ocmulgee Monte Alb´an,4, 166 Madagascar, 170 monuments, 1 Mainfort, Robert, 58 Moore, Clarence, 17 maize, 7, 8–9, 55, 56, 180 Moorehead, Warren King, 17, 174 earliest, 38, 67 Moorehead phase, 12 intensification, 38, 44, 60 Morse, Dan, 57, 58 Plum Bayou, 53 Morse, Phyllis, 57, 159 tribute, 103–6, 144 Mound #51 borrow pit, 84, 106, 165 and women, 52 Mound #72, 21, 72, 75, 87–90, 91–2, 111, Mandan, 63 115, 126, 154, 161, 165, 167, 168, marine shell. See, beads, shell 170 Marksville, 49 Mound City, 17. See also St. Louis site Marshall, Richard, 57 mound construction, 87 massacre. See Crow Creek Moundbuilder Myth, 3, 16, 23, 163, master plan, Cahokian, 90. See also grid 174 materiality, 22, 165 race, 16 Medieval Warm Period, 28, 40, 67, 151, mounds, 65 173 ridge-top. See also Mound #72, Powell memory, 47 Mound men, 110, 157 Moundville site, 12, 119, 139, 143 sacrifices, 91–2 Muller, Jon, 137 Merina, 170 Muskogees, 43, 63. See also Creek Mesoamerica, 24, 43, 44, 72, 169 linguistic traits, 143 Nassaney, Michael, 8, 51 Mesopotamia, 3, 4, 167 Natchez, 162 Mexico, 3, 42 New Deal archaeology, 18, 131, 177 mica, 83, 91, 121 Nickerson, William, 17, 176, 181 microlithic tools, 11, 84, 101, 104, 124, Nutall, Thomas, 15 133 Midwestern Taxonomic System, 43 Obion site, 11, 17, 119, 121, 136, 155, migration, 5, 14, 24, 43, 48, 128, 129, 174 131, 171, 172 O’Brien, Patricia, 96 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521520665 - Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians - Timothy R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ALTERNATE PATHWAYS TO RITUAL POWER: EVIDENCE FOR CENTRALIZED PRODUCTION AND LONG-DISTANCE EXCHANGE BETWEEN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CADDO COMMUNITIES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By SHAWN PATRICK LAMBERT Norman, Oklahoma 2017 ALTERNATE PATHWAYS TO RITUAL POWER: EVIDENCE FOR CENTRALIZED PRODUCTION AND LONG-DISTANCE EXCHANGE BETWEEN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CADDO COMMUNITIES A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Patrick Livingood, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Asa Randall ______________________________ Dr. Amanda Regnier ______________________________ Dr. Scott Hammerstedt ______________________________ Dr. Diane Warren ______________________________ Dr. Bonnie Pitblado ______________________________ Dr. Michael Winston © Copyright by SHAWN PATRICK LAMBERT 2017 All Rights Reserved. Dedication I dedicate my dissertation to my loving grandfather, Calvin McInnish and wonderful twin sister, Kimberly Dawn Thackston. I miss and love you. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I want to give my sincerest gratitude to Patrick Livingood, my committee chair, who has guided me through seven years of my masters and doctoral work. I could not wish for a better committee chair. I also want to thank Amanda Regnier and Scott Hammerstedt for the tremendous amount of work they put into making me the best possible archaeologist. I would also like to thank Asa Randall. His level of theoretical insight is on another dimensional plane and his Advanced Archaeological Theory class is one of the best I ever took at the University of Oklahoma. I express appreciation to Bonnie Pitblado, not only for being on my committee but emphasizing the importance of stewardship in archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2004 An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas William Glenn Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hill, William Glenn, "An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas" (2004). Master's Theses. 3873. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3873 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INTENSIVE SURFACE COLLECTION AND INTRASITE SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS FROM THE COY MOUND SITE (3LN20), CENTRAL ARKANSAS by William Glenn Hill A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degreeof Master of Arts Department of Anthropology WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 2004 Copyright by William Glenn Hill 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Foremost, my pursuit in archaeology would be less meaningful without the accomplishments of Dr. Randall McGuire, Dr. H. Martin Wobst, and Dr. Michael Nassaney. They have provided a theoretical perspective in archaeology that has integrated and given greater meaning to my own social and archaeological interests. I would especially like to especially thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Michael Nassaney, for the stimulating opportunity to explore research within this theoretical perspective, and my other committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertebrate Fauna of Zebree's Big Lake Phase
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 The Vertebrate Fauna of Zebree’s Big Lake Phase Lydia Dorsey Carmody [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Carmody, Lydia Dorsey, "The Vertebrate Fauna of Zebree’s Big Lake Phase. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2398 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Lydia Dorsey Carmody entitled "The Vertebrate Fauna of Zebree’s Big Lake Phase." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Walter E. Klippel, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: David G. Anderson, Kandace R. Hollenbach Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Vertebrate Fauna of Zebree’s Big Lake Phase A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Lydia Dorsey Carmody August 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas
    Volume 2021 Article 1 2021 The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Timothy K. Perttula None Duncan McKinnon Scott Hammerstedt University of Oklahoma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K.; McKinnon, Duncan; and Hammerstedt, Scott (2021) "The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2021, Article 1. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/1 1 The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Compiled by Timothy K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Burial Mound Tradition in the Caddo Area
    Volume 1997 Article 40 1997 The Development of the Burial Mound Tradition in the Caddo Area Frank F. Schambach Unknown Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Schambach, Frank F. (1997) "The Development of the Burial Mound Tradition in the Caddo Area," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1997, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.1997.1.40 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1997/iss1/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Development of the Burial Mound Tradition in the Caddo Area Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1997/iss1/40 Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, No. 9 ( 1997) 53 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BURIAL MOUND TR~DITION IN THE CADDO AREA Frank F.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Adaptation in the Ozark and Ouachita Mountains by George Sabo III, Ann M
    Human Adaptation in the Ozark and Ouachita Mountains by George Sabo III, Ann M. Early, Jerome C. Rose, Barbara A. Burnett, Louis Vogele, Jr., and James P. Harcourt Prepared by the Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1990 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 72702 First Printing, 1988; Second Printing, 1990, by the Arkansas Department of Corrections, Wrightsville Third Printing, 1998, by University of Arkansas Printing Services Forth Printing, 2003, by University of Arkansas Printing Services Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 90-80912 ii ABSTRACT This overview provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge concerning archeological resources in the Ozark Mountain—Arkansas River—Ouachita Mountain subregion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Southwest Division. Basic information on the environment of the study area is provided, followed by a review of the history of archeological research in the region. Prehistoric culture history is then reviewed according to the conventional framework of Paleo-Indian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi time periods. Historic Na- tive American, European, and American settlement history is also considered. The history of bioarcheological research in the region is summarized, and a suggested framework for future bioarcheological investigations is provided. Bioarcheological data pertaining to the Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods are then reviewed and several interpretations are made. The overview concludes with a synthesis of the archeological and bioarcheological data and interpretations in terms of four prehistoric and five historic period adaptation types. The basic features of each adaptation are identified, along with specification of important data gaps and signifi- cant research questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for 2020
    Arkansas Archeological Survey Annual Report 2019–2020 Arkansas Archeological Survey Annual Report for 2019–2020 A Division of the University of Arkansas System Arkansas Archeological Survey Annual Report for fiscal year 2019–2020 A Division of the University of Arkansas System Arkansas Archeological Survey Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 Highlights for the Year ...............................................................................................................2 Reports of the Survey Research Stations University of Arkansas Fayetteville ...................................................................................... 18 University of Arkansas at Fort Smith ................................................................................... 24 University of Arkansas at Monticello .................................................................................. 28 University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff ..................................................................................... 32 Winthrop Rockefeller Institute ............................................................................................. 38 Arkansas State University....................................................................................................... 44 Henderson State University................................................................................................... 52 Southern Arkansas University..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Oliver Site Coahoma County, Mississippi: Collected Papers, Part I a Late Woodland Through Protohistoric Mound Complex in the Northern Yazoo Basin
    The Oliver Site Coahoma County, Mississippi: Collected Papers, Part I A Late Woodland through Protohistoric Mound Complex in the Northern Yazoo Basin Compiled and Edited by John M. Connaway Assisted by Jay K. Johnson, Mary Elizabeth Harty, Jessica Crawford, and Marvin Jeter Funded by the Mississippi Department of Archives and History with a grant from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and Mississippi Development Authority Archaeological Report 39 Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi 2015 Archaeological Report No. 39 Mississippi Department of Archives and History Katie Blount Director Pamela Edwards Lieb Series Editor Chris Goodwin Managing Editor Gregory A. Waselkov and Bonnie L. Gums Technical Editors Sarah B. Mattics Design and Layout Cover Illustration: Vessels from Oliver Site, Peabody Museum Catalog. ISBN-13: 978-0-938896-05-0 Copyright © 2015 Mississippi Department of Archives and History P.O. Box 571, Jackson, MS 39205-0571 [email protected] Table of Contents Part I: List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................................ iii Part I: List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Toltec Mounds Martha Ann Rolingson, Ph.D
    Toltec Mounds Martha Ann Rolingson, Ph.D. oltec Mounds is one of the largest and most im- style of decoration on the pottery, and the kinds of pressive archeological sites in the Mississippi stone tools. Archeologists named this culture Plum RiverT valley. The immense man-made mounds, sur- Bayou, after the name of a local stream. We do not rounded by an embankment similar to a modern le- know what the Indians who built the mounds called vee, fascinated the first modern owners of the land in themselves because they did not have writing. The the 1850s. The site is large both in area—covering 100 Plum Bayou people seem to have abandoned Toltec acres—and in the size and number of mounds. The Mounds and the surrounding area sometime around two tallest mounds are 49 feet (14 meters) and 39 feet a.d. 1050. We do not know where they went, nor do (11.5 meters) high. There are sixteen smaller mounds, we know who their descendants were. though some have not survived to modern times. The site is beside a lake. A ditch and embankment made of How and Why Did They Build the earth form an enclosure on the other three sides. The Mounds? embankment was once eight to ten feet (2.5 meters) We do know that the people were impressive high and more than one mile (1615 meters) long. builders and that they planned the construction of Learning about the people who lived in the area this mound center. Excavations have shown that the and built the mounds is a long process.
    [Show full text]