Recent Advances in Air-Vehicle Design Synthesis and Optimisation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recent Advances in Air-Vehicle Design Synthesis and Optimisation 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES RECENT ADVANCES IN AIR-VEHICLE DESIGN SYNTHESIS AND OPTIMISATION David A Lovell*, Catherine A Crawford** and Kevin E Restrick** *Applied Technology Consultants, **QinetiQ Farnborough Keywords: Design synthesis, optimisation, concept design Abstract aircraft concepts that have been performed with these programs over the past 30 years has Over the past 30 years conceptual design and confirmed the effectiveness of the basic process. optimisation programs have been developed and The rapid growth in computing power per unit applied by QinetiQ and its predecessor cost in this period has enabled more complex organisations to study the effects on aircraft studies to be completed more rapidly. concepts of changes in requirements and advances in technology. Recent work is described that extends design synthesis and 1.2 Current environment optimisation to cover a far wider range of air- Design synthesis and optimisation (DSO) vehicle concepts, and links concept design methods provide the outline concept description optimisation to multi-disciplinary analysis and which is used as the starting point for more optimisation. The design and assessment comprehensive studies by technology environment being evolved at QinetiQ is specialists: configuration design in industry or reducing the time required for a design / detailed assessment by government agencies. assessment cycle and providing greater Both classes of customer place high value on flexibility in the study of concepts. the rapid turn-round of this work. At QinetiQ the two phases of work are being integrated [7] into a generic process for air-vehicle concept 1 Introduction design and assessment. Efficient definition, transfer and 1.1 Historical background enrichment of the initial concept geometry are critical to the overall process. Ref. 7 describes Work at the Royal Aerospace the integration of Computer Aided Design Establishment in the period 1970-80 coupled (CAD) into the process, and the aerodynamic aircraft synthesis, performance analysis, and shape optimisation of a military aircraft concept non-linear constrained optimisation to form generated by the QinetiQ design synthesis conceptual design optimisation methods. method. Subsequent work at QinetiQ [8] has Separate codes were written for civil [1] and added finite element structural analysis to the military [2] aircraft applications. To ensure generic process, to assess the impact of cruise acceptable execution times on the computers speed on high-speed civil transport aircraft then available, these codes were highly tailored concepts. Thus an important requirement for to specific types of aircraft. The two programs DSO methods is the availability of simple, formed the basis for subsequent code generic, geometry parameterisation schemes development at RAE, its successor that are compatible with the CAD tools used for organisations (DRA, DERA and QinetiQ), and detailed design and assessment. Airbus, e.g. refs [3,4,5]. The considerable In considering new concept shapes CAD number of studies (e.g. ref [6]) of the effects of tools are also valuable for exploring the options requirements and advances in technology on for packaging the contents of the air vehicle, © Copyright QinetiQ Limited 2004 1 LOVELL, CRAWFORD and RESTRICK and thence for defining the geometric transport aircraft, covers section shapes that constraints that need to be included in the have the body slope matched to that of the wing design synthesis. root at the body side. The second (discrete), Recent years have seen a major expansion applicable to most other civil and military air in the variety of concept shapes that are being vehicles, has a slope discontinuity at the body considered for air vehicles. Whereas in the past side. Geometry variables are defined to describe DSO could be based on the characteristics of sides that may be curved or sloped. Fig 2 existing, related air vehicles, today relevant data indicates the wide range of sections that may be do not exist for many of the concepts under modelled. consideration. Reliance now has to be placed on Five of the variables determining the the definition of a virtual air vehicle, shaped by geometry of each cross section are treated as detail design tools and analysed by state-of-the- optimisation variables, and constraints are art tools (e.g. CFD and FE structural analyses), defined to ensure internal items can be to create the required data. At QinetiQ response contained within the section. Fig 3 and Table 1 surface methods are used [7] to permit the data show the results from minimising the cross- from the performance analyses at the detailed sectional area of two blended cross-sections level (aerodynamics, mass etc) to be distilled for while containing a large payload bay between use at the concept design level. Fig 1 them. The execution times quoted are for a 1-2 summarises the generic process. GHz PC processor. Because of the needs to cover a wider 2.1.2 Longitudinal sections range of concept shapes, and to respond rapidly A simple parameterisation of the to evolving military requirements or to respond longitudinal cross section of the body, in terms to changes in the market needs for transport of thickness and camber, has been developed aircraft, QinetiQ has begun to construct DSO that can be used to model a wide variety of programs based on common modules. shapes. Applications of this parameterisation to The remainder of the paper describes the body centre line section of a flying wing, a aspects of design synthesis that have been UAV and a missile are shown in Fig 4. addressed recently and will feature as common Ten of the variables determining the modules in future programs. section geometry are treated as optimisation variables. Position variables and constraints are 2 Geometry Parameterisation also defined for internal items to ensure that they can be contained within the section. Fig 5 Geometry parameterisation schemes have and Table 1 show the results from minimising been developed for the major components of air the centre-line sectional area of a flying wing vehicles that are sufficiently generic to represent concept which contains two large packages. a wide range of concepts. The degree of detail employed enables the internal packaging of the 2.1.3 Complete body component to be modelled, and the volume and The parameterisation for cross sections has surface area to be estimated to the level of been combined with that for longitudinal accuracy appropriate for initial concept design. sections to provide a geometry description for a complete body. Fig 6 and Table 1 show the 2.1 Centre body results from an application of this geometry in which the values of the geometric variables for 2.1.1 Cross sections the centre-line section and three cross sections The geometry parameterisation developed have been optimised to minimise the volume of covers two classes of body cross section. The the body to contain two boxes. In addition to first (blended), applicable to low-observable those controlling the body shape, variables military air vehicles and blended wing-body define the fore-and-aft, and vertical positions of the packaged items. Associated constraints 2 RECENT ADVANCES IN AIR-VEHICLE DESIGN SYNTHESIS AND OPTIMISATION ensure these packages do not overlap and that Three internal items are considered: the they are contained within the body. passenger cabin, the landing gear, and the cargo hold. These items have the greatest effect on 2.1.4 Application to blended wing transport the performance and external shape of the aircraft aircraft. The layout within the passenger cabin Recent work has been undertaken by is particularly important because the QinetiQ as part of the REUTAC research unconventional shape of the aircraft means that programme (Rapid Evaluation of passenger comfort levels, and the means of Unconventional Transport Aircraft Concepts access (including emergency exit) can have a [9]), funded by Airbus and the UK Department major impact on the aerodynamic and structural of Trade and Industry. Here the centre body of a aspects of the design. For example, for a given blended-wing-body (BWB) aircraft has been cabin width, as the leading edge sweep of the modelled using the techniques described above aircraft body is increased, the overall length of (Fig.7), and implemented in a DSO program. the aircraft will increase to seat the required It is important to model accurately the number of passengers. The increased length will layout of this type of aircraft configuration change the structural and aerodynamic during the conceptual design phase. The novel properties, and change the position of the cargo design allows greater flexibility in the and the loading on the landing gear. This may positioning of items such as the passenger be offset by an increase in the space available cabin, cargo, and the undercarriage, compared for exits, access for ground handling equipment, with a conventional civil transport aircraft. and passenger movement. Factors that need to be considered early in the The undercarriage is a large package that design process are passenger acceptability, can have a major effect on the external surfaces, evacuation requirements, and accessibility for and on the position and quantity of cargo that ground handling equipment. may be carried. The position of the The external geometry and the internal undercarriage is controlled by the optimiser, packages are handled independently and are with constraints applied to ensure a sensible sized and positioned using appropriate design design (e.g. to meet centre of gravity rules. The code is modular so that alternative requirements). descriptions of the geometry, or more The cargo hold consists of up to seven comprehensive design relationships, may be separate cargo areas, depending on the size of used depending on the study requirements. aircraft. The size and position of the cargo areas The surface of the centre body is modelled are allowed to vary and constraints are applied by longitudinal sections across the span of the to ensure that the required clearance envelopes body.
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society
    A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY Royal Aeronautical Society Council Dinner at the Science Museum on 26 May 1932 with Guest of Honour Miss Amelia Earhart. Edited by Chris Male MRAeS Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com Afterburner Society News RAeS 150th ANNIVERSARY www.aerosociety.com/150 The Royal Aeronautical Society: Part 1 – The early years The Beginning “At a meeting held at Argyll Lodge, Campden Hill, Right: The first Aeronautical on 12 January 1866, His Grace The Duke of Argyll Exhibition, Crystal Palace, 1868, showing the presiding; also present Mr James Glaisher, Dr Hugh Stringfellow Triplane model W. Diamond, Mr F.H. Wenham, Mr James Wm. Butler and other exhibits. No fewer and Mr F.W. Brearey. Mr Glaisher read the following than 77 exhibits were address: collected together, including ‘The first application of the Balloon as a means of engines, lighter- and heavier- than-air models, kites and ascending into the upper regions of the plans of projected machines. atmosphere has been almost within the recollection A special Juror’s Report on on ‘Aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy of men now living but with the exception of some the exhibits was issued. bodies impelled through air are sustained’. of the early experimenters it has scarcely occupied Below: Frederick W Brearey, Wenham’s lecture is now one of the aeronautical Secretary of the the attention of scientific men, nor has the subject of Aeronautical Society of Great classics and was the beginning of the pattern of aeronautics been properly recognised as a distinct Britain, 1866-1896.
    [Show full text]
  • International Customer Approvals
    Feb 2019 International Customer Approvals This document reflects the approvals our products conform to, for which we have been made aware of. This is not a definitive list and we welcome you to contact us for further details of the specifications you are looking for. • AS9100 (Rev D) NQA Cert 50981 • BS EN ISO 9001-2015 NQA Cert 50981 • BS EN IS0 14001-2015 ISOQAR 8145 • Cage Code K3504 (UK) – Indestructible Paint Ltd • Cage Code 00B6 (USA) – Indestructible Inc. Manufacturing & MRO’s A list of some of the companies we have dealt with historically and currently, some of whom we have gained approvals from. • Airbus UK Ltd / Airbus SAS: 204492 • Honeywell, Phoenix Arizona PCS 5022 • Airfoil Services OSL-006/06 • Hychrome (Europe) Ltd • Allison (RR INC) PMI 200 • ITP, Spain E-200060-SA • British Aerospace PLC, Aircraft Group (BAE/AG/30539/2004) • IHI, Japan • British Aerospace PLC, Civil Aircraft, Air Weapons & Airbus • Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Japan Divisions (BAE/2256, BAE/CHE/2006) • BAE Evaluated Supplier ACO/I/LT/JJH/3244 • Lucas Western • Agusta-Westland Aerospace UK: V02007 (040/92/S) • Marconi Communications • Agusta-Westland Spa • Meggitt (Dunlop) Ltd – Aviation & Precision Rubbers Divisions • Allied Signal • Meggitt Aerospace Braking Systems, Coventry • Avions Marcel Dassault • Meggitt Thermal Systems • Boeing – McDonnell Douglas Helicopters • M.T.U Aeroengines • Bombardier – Supplier Ref: 0000109995 • Pratt & Whitney Canada • BMW – Rolls Royce • Pratt & Whitney USA • Dassault Belgique • Pratt & Whitney Singapore: F038 • Dowty
    [Show full text]
  • How Can the UK Maintain Leadership in Aerospace Manufacturing?
    How can the UK maintain leadership in Aerospace manufacturing? Raytheon UK Industry Debate and Parliamentary Reception Cranfield University Contents 3 Introduction 4 Peter Felstead 6 Raytheon UK report 8 Emma Reynolds MP 9 Dods research 11 Steve Baker MP 12 Dods research 14 Mark Tami MP 2 Introduction n 3rd December 2012, Raytheon UK, a culture of innovation, a vibrant research and O supported by Airbus UK and the Royal development base and an influx of new recruits, Aeronautical Society, hosted policy and industry who are inspired and enthused by the opportunities experts from across the Aerospace sector at the in Aerospace, the UK can continue to lead. Institute of Mechanical Engineers to discuss how Writing in this report, Emma Reynolds MP and the UK can maintain its position as a global leader Steve Baker MP set out their views on encouraging in Aerospace manufacturing. children to aspire to a career in aerospace This report not only contains research and engineering and retaining this talent within the case studies drawn from the panel discussions on sector, while Mark Tami MP argues the case for the day, but also a series of exclusive articles from greater investment in manufacturing technologies parliamentarians who offer their perspectives on to ensure the UK’s future global position. the challenges and opportunities for the UK in the race for excellence. We hope that you find the research and opinion During the day, delegates heard how with informative. 3 Race for aerospace Despite a challenging global picture the UK retains its position of ‘true excellence’ in the aerospace industry.
    [Show full text]
  • European Aviation Safety Agency 21 May 2010
    European Aviation Safety Agency 21 May 2010 NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) NO 2010-05 DRAFT DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY Amending Decision No. 2003/19/RM of the Executive Director of the European Aviation Safety Agency of 28 November 2003 on Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2042/2003 of 20 November 20031 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks “Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence” 1 OJ L 315, 28.11.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 127/2010 of 05 February 2010 (OJ L 40, 13.02.2010, p. 4). R.F008-02 © European Aviation Safety Agency, 2009. All rights reserved. Proprietary document. Page 1 of 57 NPA 2010-05 21 May 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXPLANATORY NOTE ..................................................................................... 3 I. GENERAL .......................................................................................................... 3 II. CONSULTATION................................................................................................... 3 III. COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT............................................................................... 4 IV. CONTENT OF THE DRAFT DECISION............................................................................. 4 V. REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Pay Gap Report 2020 Airbus in the UK Airbus in the UK, Gender Pay Gap Report 2020 2
    Gender Pay Gap Report 2020 Airbus in the UK Airbus in the UK, Gender Pay Gap Report 2020 2 Airbus in the UK 2020 Pay Gap Report At Airbus, we know there is power in This is the fourth year we have reported in the UK and we We confirm that the gender pay gap data reported diversity. And diversity comes in many continue to work hard to improve gender balance. is accurate and has been published in accordance forms. Today, across the company, more Are we doing enough? Looking at our 2020 gender pay gap with the Gender Pay Gap Reporting than 140 nations are represented and figures, we see some improvements, but there is still more regulations under the Equality Act 2010 over 20 languages spoken. And we all to do. (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017. have one common language: a passion to Promoting gender parity is a top priority in our recruitment strive for excellence and to deliver on our efforts. We are also committed to facilitating the progression commitments not only to our customers, of women to leadership positions. Globally, our target is for but also to the communities in which 25% of Executive positions to be held by women by 2025. we operate. Today, 25% of our Board of Directors are female. We are committed to providing fair and competitive Aerospace and defence are historically male-dominated rewards to all our people for the roles they perform, industries. We are committed to changing that. Until women regardless of their gender. are represented equally, our global progress, creativity, and business success will be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connection
    The Connection ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2011: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2011 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 978-0-,010120-2-1 Printed by 3indrush 4roup 3indrush House Avenue Two Station 5ane 3itney O72. 273 1 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 8arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 8ichael Beetham 4CB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air 8arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-8arshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman 4roup Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary 4roup Captain K J Dearman 8embership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol A8RAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA 8embers Air Commodore 4 R Pitchfork 8BE BA FRAes 3ing Commander C Cummings *J S Cox Esq BA 8A *AV8 P Dye OBE BSc(Eng) CEng AC4I 8RAeS *4roup Captain A J Byford 8A 8A RAF *3ing Commander C Hunter 88DS RAF Editor A Publications 3ing Commander C 4 Jefford 8BE BA 8anager *Ex Officio 2 CONTENTS THE BE4INNIN4 B THE 3HITE FA8I5C by Sir 4eorge 10 3hite BEFORE AND DURIN4 THE FIRST 3OR5D 3AR by Prof 1D Duncan 4reenman THE BRISTO5 F5CIN4 SCHOO5S by Bill 8organ 2, BRISTO5ES
    [Show full text]
  • Performance & Discipline
    2002 Results Performance & Discipline Philippe Camus - Rainer Hertrich, CEOs Hans Peter Ring, CFO Analysts meeting - Paris - March 10th, 2003 1 Safe Harbor Statement Certain of the statements contained in this document are not historical facts but rather are statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on management‘s beliefs. These statements reflect the Company‘s views and assumptions as of the date of the statements and involve known and unknown risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. When used in this document, words such as “anticipate ”, “believe ”, “estimate ”, “expect ”, “may ”, “intend ”, “plan to ” and “project ”are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, projections for improvements in process and operations, new business opportunities, revenues and revenues growth, operating margin growth, cash flow, deliveries, launches, compliance with delivery schedules, performance against Company targets, new products, current and future markets for the Company products and other trend projections. This forward looking information is based upon a number of assumptions including without limitation: · Assumption regarding demand · Current and future markets for the Company‘s products and services · Internal performance including the ability to successfully integrate EADS‘ activities to control costs and maintain quality
    [Show full text]
  • January 2017 AEROSPACE
    AEROSPACE January 2017 44 Number 1 Volume Society Royal Aeronautical JANUARY 2017 NEWSPACE START- UPS AIM FOR ORBIT BREXIT – TAILWIND OR TURBULENCE? VIRTUAL HELICOPTER DESIGN www.aerosociety.com REDRESSING THE BALANCE RECRUITING MORE FEMALE PILOTS Have you renewed your Membership Subscription for 2017? Your membership subscription is due on 1 January 2017 and any unpaid memberships will lapse on 31 March 2017. As per the Society’s Regulations, all How to renew: membership benefits will be suspended where Online: a payment for an individual subscription has Log in to your account on the Society’s www.aerosociety.com not been received after three months of the website to pay at . If you due date. However, this excludes members do not have an account, you can register online paying their annual subscriptions by Direct and pay your subscription straight away. Debits in monthly instalments to October. Telephone: Call the Subscriptions Department +44 (0)20 7670 4315 / 4304 We don’t want you to lose all of your on membership benefits, which include: Cheque: Cheques should be made payable to • Your monthly subscription to AEROSPACE the Royal Aeronautical Society and sent to the magazine Subscriptions Department at No.4 Hamilton • Use of your RAeS post nominals as Place, London W1J 7BQͭ UK. applicable Direct Debit: Complete the Direct Debit • Over 400 global events yearly mandate form included in your renewal letter • Discounted rates for conferences or complete the mandate form online once you • Online publications including Society News, have logged into your account by 16 January. blogs and podcasts BACS Transfer: • Involvement with your local branch Pay by Bank Transfer (or by • Networking opportunities BACS) into the Society’s bank account, quoting your name and membership number.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Systems Airbus.Indd
    BAE Systems Airbus Project: New milling machine for Airbus wings TEAM Service: Field Machining Need and Challenge: To overcome the need to remove the plateaux (part of the wing) to be milled flat for a precise fit, as well as avoiding the risk of distortion when re-fitted to the aircraft. Solution and Outcome A unique pylon milling machine designed and produced for BAE Systems Airbus United Kingdom by TEAM, is used in the manufacture of the wings for the new variant Airbus A340-600. TEAM worked closely with Airbus UK on this latest variant of the Airbus A340-600 at the jig development stage, using the latest computer-aided 3D design, so that the milling machine and jig designs could be integrated, to achieve optimum performance. The lightweight milling machine is designed to attach to the A-frame jig to enable the part of the wing known as the plateau, to which the pylons holding the outboard engines are attached, to be milled in-situ on the wing jig. The result is a highly accurate, ‘picture frame’ milling machine 800-900mm square and 500mm deep built using light-weight materials (ensuring that the A-frames are not distorted when the machine is mounted), that will mill to an accuracy of within less than 0.1mm. Their use saves up to 16 hours in the time taken to make each set of wings. The time and cost benefits are substantial. Overview A unique pylon milling machine designed and produced for BAE Systems Airbus This work may have been performed by a company subsequently United Kingdom by TEAM, is used in the acquired by TEAM.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Systems/Waer Systems Limited Case Study
    Case Study BAE Systems & Waer Systems Limited • Supply chain process understanding and improvement • Partnership relationship with suppliers • Project champion and senior level support • 82% reduction in stock • 56% reduction in process times • Supplier service level rating increased from 65% to 95% • Introduction BAE Systems has resulted from the merger of British Aerospace and GEC Marconi Systems. The company manufactures critical wing components for all Airbus aircraft. Two sets of wings are transported daily from its site at Broughton in North Wales, to Toulouse in France and Bremen in Germany, where the finished aircraft are assembled by the Airbus partners. • The Problem “Fasteners” is a collective term for items like nuts, bolts and rivets, used in very large quantities to hold the components of the wing together. The fastener operation, one of the largest in the world, was under pressure to improve, from forces both inside and outside the company. Internally, BAE Systems wanted to improve management, storage, distribution and usage of the fasteners, ultimately to reduce costs. Outside influences included the Civil Aviation Authority who required improved traceability, and fastener suppliers who required greater visibility of fastener usage in order to Airbus A340 improve their service and profitability. The fastener stores utilised an inflexible system with limited part number and transaction functionality. The staff made it work but frustration was inherent, and they were constantly criticised for a problem that manifested itself in stores but was itself, not the source of the problem. Physically, the area was cramped, dark and overstocked with inadequate racking. John Champion, Group Commodity Manager, Airbus UK, spearheaded the drive for change and ensured that those responsible for the success of the initiative had the resources and the support that they needed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Honours, Medals & Awards Brochure
    2020 Honours, Medals & Awards Royal Aeronautical Society ...... RAeS Honours, Medals & Awards The global aerospace community’s most prestigious and long-standing awards honouring achievement, innovation and excellence. The Royal Aeronautical Society has been honouring outstanding achievers in the global aerospace industry since 1909, when Wilbur and Orville Wright came to London to receive the Society’s first Gold Medal. Over the years, honouring aerospace achievers in this way has become an annual tradition. The Society’s Awards Programme recognises and celebrates individuals and teams who have made an exceptional contribution to aerospace, whether it is for an outstanding achievement, a major technical innovation, exceptional leadership, or for work that will further advance aerospace. Contents RAeS Honours & Medals Flt Lt Ian Brosch 17 Dr Jack Marlow 17 Dr Alan Nelson 18 Dr Meyer J Benzakein 3 Mr Peter White 18 Professor Trevor Birch 4 Dr Ashwani Gupta 4 Ing Fabio Nannoni 5 Dr David Newman 5 Young Persons’ Awards Dr Alexander J Smits 6 Mr Tom Williams 6 Mr Nick Goss 19 The Honourable Jeffrey Shane 7 Mr Alexander Bowen-Rotsaert 19 Mr Idris Ben-Tahir 7 Mr Hayden Jakes 19 Dr Alice Bunn 8 Corporal Ben Massey 20 Dr Ashitey Trebi-Ollennu 8 Dr Mushfiqul Alam 20 Mr Edward Anderson 9 Ms Zoe Garstang 20 Mr Greg McDougall 9 Mr Ian Walters 9 Aircraft Fuel Tank Component Design Team 10 HTX Team 10 2019 Written Paper Prizes Space Fence Delivery Team 11 P-8A Delivery Team 11 J M Luckring 21 Team Phoenix 12 J A Stockford, C Lawson and Z Liu 21-22 UAVaid Team 12 P Janhunen, P Tolvanen and K Ruosteenoja 22-23 S Zelinski and R Windhorst 23 B Khandelwal, J Cronly, I S Ahmed, 24-25 Specialist Awards C J Wijesinghe and C Lewis H Gesell, F Wolters and M Plohr 25 H Gesell 26 Dr Helen Webber 13 G Dussart 26 Mr Gianluca Vecchio 13 J A D Ackroyd 27 Dr Peter Hancock 14 Captain John Cox 15 Mr Ben Lewis 15 Dr Jonathan McDowell 16 Roll of Honour 28 Mr Danny Wright 16 .....
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Handbook Royal Aeronautical Society
    Handbook 2019 2019 Handbook Royal Aeronautical Society SLS_RAeS_advert_Jan_2019_Layout 1 09/01/2019 10:43 Page 1 LANDING SYSTEMS n a r f a S / e r a o D e L l a c s a P © Safran Landing Systems is the world leader in the design, development, manufacture and support of aircraft landing and braking systems. The company supplies innovative landing gear solutions to 30 leading commercial, military, business and regional aircraft manufacturers. We support more than 27,000 aircraft in-service, making over 60,000 landings every day. The company employs over 7,000 staff worldwide across sites in Europe, North America and Asia, including a team of 1,200 people in Safran Landing Systems Gloucester at the company’s UK landing gear production and repair Cheltenham Road East facilities. The Gloucester facility has been at the forefront of landing Gloucester, GL2 9QH gear technology for over 85 years, dating from the innovative designs Tel: 01452 712424 of Sir George Dowty to the advanced landing gears for the world’s www.safran-landing-systems.com most modern aircraft. SLS_RAeS_advert_Jan_2019_Layout 1 09/01/2019 10:43 Page 1 Royal Aeronautical Society / Handbook 2019 LANDING SYSTEMS Contents Section 1 4 Headquarters Royal Aeronautical Society President’s Introduction No.4 Hamilton Place Chief Executive’s Foreword London W1J 7BQ RAeS President United Kingdom President-Elect +44 (0)20 7670 4300 Raising Aspirations Through Aviation [email protected] www.aerosociety.com Section 2 Find us on facebook.com 14 Follow us on twitter.com/@aerosociety and
    [Show full text]