The Planetary Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Planetary Report Volu me XV On the Cover: A rare storm rages ac ross the face of Saturn as Table of Number 5 se en by th e Hubble Space Telescope. Th e wh ite, • September/October 1995 arrowhead-shaped feature is about as big across Contents (1 2,700 kilometers or 7,900 miles) as Earth . The winds at the storm's latitude blow at about 1,600 ki lometers (990 miles) per hour. HST has been watching the storm since its discovery in Se ptember 1994. Flyby spacecraft such as the Voyagers ca n't give us such repeated cove rage, Features Departlnents which enhances the value of the HST data. This image was taken on December 1, 1994, Japan Looks to the MeRlbers' when Saturn was 1,455 mi llion kilometers 4 3 Future: A Long-TerRI Dialogue (904 million miles) from Earth . Lunar Plan Image: Reta Beebe, D. Gilmore, L. Berg eron and NASA The debate continues: Should the Moon or While the other space faring nations trim Mars be the focus of exploratory efforts? their ambitions, Japan is methodically moving toward the Moon and the planets World beyond. Here are the details of their plan 6 Watch Froln for the Moon. It includes both scientific This summer, NASA came under withering exploration and utilization. attack in the US Congress. Here we detail The the battle and let you know the role the 7 The Ne\IV Society is playing in the fight to save Editor Pluto Express planetary exploration. The Pluto Fast Flyby mission, which we ur efforts are often divided, reported on last year, has mutated again. 18 Ne\IVs and O at The Planetary Society, It's now the Pluto Express, with an even Revie\IVs between portraying for our members smaller spacecraft designed to explore Last year's collision of comet Shoemaker­ a hopeful future in the solar system the outermost planet. Levy 9 with Jupiter still holds center stage and alerting them of attacks on that in science magazines. Our faithful colum­ RORlancing the Stone: nist reviews several articles on the great future. This split is graphically illus­ 8 The Near-Earth crash of 1994. trated by this issue, in which we lay Asteroid Rendezvous out Japan's plans for lunar exploration The first wave of exploratory spacecraft Society and report on the most potentially passed by the small objects that orbit the 19 Ne\IVs devastating budget cuts in NASA's Sun in Earth's neighborhood. But as our Once again, we bring you up to date on history. knowledge has grown, so has our aware­ the latest Society projects and events. Political skirmishes have become ness of the importance of these bodies to weekly events. And not only NASA understanding the solar system. NEAR 20 Questions and is endangered: Some in the United will be the first in-depth mission to study Ans\IVers States Congress have threatened to an asteroid. It's a good question: Without landmarks eliminate the US Geological Survey, to guide observers, how do they find a main player in planetary science. 12 Traveling Through a objects in space? Plus, an alert reader Meanwhile, members of the Mirror: The Hubble raises a query about a Basics of Space­ European Space Agency can't agree Space Telescope fli ght column. on their space program, and in Russia Studies the Planets there's not enough money to fund The Hubble Space Telescope has now 22 Basics of even approved missions. Only Japan completed its initial survey of the planets. Spaceflight: seems committed to a future in space. The images are truly marvelous and the Attitude Control This may be the most critical time next best thing to being there. We present "Roll," "pitch" and "yaw" are common for citizen action in the Space Age. its finest planetary portraits so far, and terms used to describe the attitudes of Contact your government representa­ there will be more before Hubble completes spacecraft traveling among the planets. its mission. tives and let them know your vision You'll come to understand them in this next installment of our primer on planetary of the future. Now, more than ever, exploration. that future is in your hands. - Charlene M. Anderson The Planetary Report (ISSN 0736-3680) is published bimonthly at the editorial offices of The Planetary Society, 65 North Catalina Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91106-2301,818-793-5100. It is available to members of The Planetary Society. Annual dues in the US are $25 (US dollars); in Canada, $35 (Canadian dollars). Dues in other countries are $40 (US dollars) . Printed in USA. Third-class postage at Pasadena, California, and at an additional mailing office. Canada Post Agreement Number 87424. A Publication of Editor. CHARLENE M. ANDERSO N Technical Editor, JAMES D. BURKE THE-PL.A~TfRV SOCIETV ' Assistant Editor, DONNA ESCANDON STEVENS Copy Editor. GLORI A JOYCE Prpduction Editor, MIC HAEL HAGGERTY Art Director, BARBARA S. SMITH o .~ --e- cP -B- 0 V~wpojn t s expressed in columns or ed itorials are those of the authors and do nat necessarily represent positions of The Planetary Sociel y, ils officers or advisors. © 1995 by The Planetary SocIety. o Board of Direct~rs CARL SAGAN President Members' Director, Laboratory for Planetary Studies, Cornel! University BRUCE MURRAY Dialogue Vice President Professor of Planetary Science, California Institute of TechnOlogy LOUIS FRIEDMAN Executive Director NORMAN R. AU GUSTINE PreSident, Lockheed Martin Corporation JOSEPH RYAN Executive Vice President and Genera! Counsel, Marriott International STEVEN SPIELBERG director and producer Moon or Mars? space station and watching NASA one indulging in our era's warm LAUREL l. WILKENING Tom Harris and Paul Klarer have downsize yet again. and comfortable hypocrisy be Chancel/or, UniversHy of California, Irvine launched a much-needed debate Mars is the sexy goal, and I do allowed to claim that there is no Board of Advisors DIANE ACKERMAN within the Society (see the May/ agree that we should go there. But, money available to be invested in poet and author June 1995 issue of The Planetary we ought to establish ourselves on humanity'S future! BUZZ ALDRIN Report). While our main focus has the Moon first. -VINCE CREISLER, Apo ll o 11 astronaut RICHARD BERENDZEN long been Mars, perhaps the Moon Americans need to lose the Kent, Washington educator and astrophysicist JACQUES BLAMONT is a more realistic target. Why? "been there, done that" attitude of CIJief ScIentiSt, Centre National Because historically, politics and recent years and consider the real hnpact Crater d'Etudes Spatiales, France RAY BRADBURY economics have had more to do possibilities and scientific benefits. In Paul Geissler's interesting arti­ poet and author with exploration than either science A global effort to return to the Moon cle on Earth images returned by ARTHUR C. CLAR KE author or adventure. When America ought to be undertaken soon. It's Galileo (in the May/June 1995 CORNELIS DE JAGER Professor of Space Research, entered the Moon race, it was in painfully clear that the United issue), a feature we see commonly The Astronomiea/lnstitute at Utrecht, response to geopolitical concerns. States is not going to proceed on on many other bodies in the solar the Netherlands FRANK DRAKE Just as the detailed scientific study its own with such a project. system-but less often on our own Professor of Astronomy and AstrophysiCS, of the Moon was getting under - CATHERINE KOUNS BORN, planet-went unnoticed in one of University of California, santa Cruz JOHN GARDNER way, the Apollo program was cur­ Lakeview, Ohio the pictures. I refer, of course, to founder, Common Cause MARC GARNEAU tailed because our leaders thought the scar produced when an asteroid Canadian astronaut there was nothing to be gained Priorities? or comet collides with us. GEORGIY GOLITSYN Institute of AtmospheriC Physics, politically, nor economically, Whether humanity's drive to In the image of parts of Australia Russian Academy of Sciences through continued exploration. Or explore is instinctive or cultural is shown on page 10, mention is THEODORE M. HESBURGH President Emeritus, so it seemed at the time. Now we open to debate (see Tom Harris' made of the dry salt lakes on the University of Notre Dame SHIRLEY M. HUFSTEDLER know that the Moon is a potential letter in the May/June 1995 issue left. These are mostly of irregular educator and jurist source of energy. Helium 3 in the of The Planetary Report). But the shape, except for one, the most GARRY E. HUNT lunar regolith could power fusion question of why our generation southerly, which is close to circular space scientist, United Kingdom SERGEI KA PI TSA reactors here on Earth. Moreover, falters at the threshold of the new and about an eighth of an inch Institute for Physical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences other lunar resources could be used frontier can be answered in a single across in that picture. This structure GEN. DON ALD J. KUTYNA (RET,) in the establishment of an Earth­ word: hypocrisy. is called Lake Acraman. In 1986, former Commander, US Space Command JOHN M. LOGSDON Moon transportation system. Within We stand upon the shoulders of it was recognized by University Space Policy Institute, the next 30 years, lunar exploration humble frontiersmen and women of Adelaide geologists Vic Gostin Washington University HANS MARK could become economically attrac­ who forged the hostile wilderness and George Williams to be an The University of Texas at Austin tive. Which, in my opinion, is the into our modern world. They impact scar. I call it a scar rather JAM ES MICH ENER author key to generating the political and endured deprivation and hardship than a crater because it has been MARVIN MINSKY Toshiba Professor of .
Recommended publications
  • From the Hubble Space Telescope
    Teacher’s Guide From the Hubble Space Telescope Exploring Space and Cyberspace An electronic field trip via interactive television and on-line networks into America’s classrooms Project Notes Programs and Initial Air Dates and Times Contingency Announcement Program 2 Making YOUR Observations Field research on a scientific frontier is March 14, 1996, 13:00-14:00 Eastern inherently unpredictable. Even traditional school trips are subject to weather and dis- Program 3 Announcing YOUR Results ruptions. An electronic field trip is no dif- Live from the Hubble Space April 23, 1996, 13:00-14:00 Eastern ferent: the Telescope programs are dependent on the Please Note: HST operating normally, NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellites being available, Program 1 The Great Planet Debate and all domestic satellite links holding (see first aired November 9, 1995, as an introduction Activity 2D, page 24 below, for more to the entire project. (For videotapes, see below) background on how the electronic images get from Pluto to you!) The production Primary Satellite Coordinates team has put in place contingency plans for most eventualities. In the event of tempo- Ku-band: PBS K-12 Learning Services:Telstar 401, 97 degrees rary loss of signal, live programming will West, transponder 8, horizontal, 11915 Mhz, audio on 6.2 and 6.8 continue from ground sites, interspersed Please note: this refers to carriage on the primary satellite used by PBS. Carriage on with pre-taped segments. the satellite itself does not guarantee broadcast by any individual PBS station. Please Register for on-line Live from the check local listings well in advance of air time to verify local arrangements! An on-line Hubble Space Telescope updates or check listing of confirmed carriage by local stations and educational networks will be acces- our Web site: sible between March 1, 1996 and April 23, 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 110 ª June 2002 NEWSLETTER
    Newsletter 110 ª June 2002 NEWSLETTER The American Astronomical Societys2000 Florida Avenue, NW, Suite 400sWashington, DC [email protected] AAS NEWS PRESIDENT’S COLUMN Wallerstein is Anneila I. Sargent, Caltech, [email protected] My term as President of the American Astronomical Society Russell Lecturer will end with our meeting in Albuquerque in June 2002. Usually This year, the AAS this letter would be the appropriate place to consider my bestows its highest honor, expectations and goals when I took up the gavel and compare the Henry Norris Russell these with what actually happened. Lectureship on George The events of 11 September 2001 caused me to write that kind Wallerstein, Professor of reflective letter in the December issue of this Newsletter.I Emeritus of Astronomy at won’t repeat myself here except to note that at that time there the University of seemed to be less enthusiasm to fund research in the physical Washington. Wallerstein is sciences than we had grown to expect when I took office. recognized in the award citation for “...his As I write this column, the prospects look much less bleak. In contributions to our another part of this Newsletter, Kevin Marvel discusses how understanding of the astronomy fared in the President’s FY ’03 budget request. George Wallerstein of the University of NASA’s Office of Space Science is doing very well indeed. In Washington will deliver his Russell Lecture abundances of the at the Seattle Meeting in January 2003. elements in stars and fact, the OSS budget has been increasing steadily since 1996 and clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Space Imaging
    The FutureofSpaceImaging The Future of Space Imaging Report of a Community-Based Study of an Advanced Camera for the Hubble Space Telescope hen Lyman Spitzer first proposed a great, W earth-orbiting telescope in , the nuclear energy source of stars had been known for just six years. Knowledge of galaxies beyond our own and the understanding that our universe is expanding were only about twenty years of age in the human consciousness. The planet Pluto was seventeen. Quasars, black holes, gravitational lenses, and detection of the Big Bang were still in the future—together with much of what constitutes our current understanding of the solar system and the cos- mos beyond it. In , forty-seven years after it was conceived in a for- gotten milieu of thought, the Hubble Space Telescope is a reality. Today, the science of the Hubble attests to the forward momentum of astronomical exploration from ancient times. The qualities of motion and drive for knowledge it exemplifies are not fixed in an epoch or a gen- eration: most of the astronomers using Hubble today were not born when the idea of it was first advanced, and many were in the early stages of their education when the glass for its mirror was cast. The commitments we make today to the fu- ture of the Hubble observatory will equip a new generation of young men and women to explore the astronomical frontier at the start of the st century. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FRONT & BACK COVER 1.Globular clusters containing young stars at the core of elliptical galaxy NGC 1275.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyage to Jupiter. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 312 131 SE 050 900 AUTHOR Morrison, David; Samz, Jane TITLE Voyage to Jupiter. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. Scientific and Technical Information Branch. REPORT NO NASA-SP-439 PUB DATE 80 NOTE 208p.; Colored photographs and drawings may not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 ($9.00). PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Technology; *Astronomy; Satellites (Aerospace); Science Materials; *Science Programs; *Scientific Research; Scientists; *Space Exploration; *Space Sciences IDENTIFIERS *Jupiter; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; *Voyager Mission ABSTRACT This publication illustrates the features of Jupiter and its family of satellites pictured by the Pioneer and the Voyager missions. Chapters included are:(1) "The Jovian System" (describing the history of astronomy);(2) "Pioneers to Jupiter" (outlining the Pioneer Mission); (3) "The Voyager Mission"; (4) "Science and Scientsts" (listing 11 science investigations and the scientists in the Voyager Mission);.(5) "The Voyage to Jupiter--Cetting There" (describing the launch and encounter phase);(6) 'The First Encounter" (showing pictures of Io and Callisto); (7) "The Second Encounter: More Surprises from the 'Land' of the Giant" (including pictures of Ganymede and Europa); (8) "Jupiter--King of the Planets" (describing the weather, magnetosphere, and rings of Jupiter); (9) "Four New Worlds" (discussing the nature of the four satellites); and (10) "Return to Jupiter" (providing future plans for Jupiter exploration). Pictorial maps of the Galilean satellites, a list of Voyager science teams, and a list of the Voyager management team are appended. Eight technical and 12 non-technical references are provided as additional readings.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Planets
    Giant Planets Mark Marley (NASA Ames) for the Planetary Decadal Survey Giant Planets Subpanel Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1 GPP Membership Reta Beebe Brigette Hesman Wayne Richie NMSU NRAO NASA Langley atmos. dynamics atm chemistry engineer John Casani William Hubbard Kunio Sayanagi JPL University of Arizona CalTech engineer, NAE interiors dynamics, theory John Clarke Mark Marley Amy Simon-Miller Boston University NASA Ames NASA Goddard aurorae, magnetos. exoplanets panel vice-chair Heidi Hammel Phil Nicholson Space Science Cornell University Institute rings panel chair Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2 Today • Some highlights of giant planet science in the past decade that impact future exploration goals (personal perspective, neglecting Cassini) • Stressing: Connection to brown dwarfs & 400+ exoplanets • Decadal process • whitepapers • mission studies • key technologies • community input Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3 Solar System Jovian Planets Serve as Waypoints in a Continuum of Objects Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4 TiO FeH K H2O H2O 6 H2O M6.5 V 10 L5 H O T.5 CO 2 Jupiter K M6 4 CIA H2 10 CH4 CH4 CH4 CH4 CH4 L5 CH4 NH3 2 10 T5 CH4 (1.30µm) x Constant ! f NH ! 3 / ! f ! 100 Jupiter CH4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wavelength (µm) Marley & Leggett (2009) Tuesday, December 22, 2009 5 oklo.org Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6 15 ) • Transiting planets 10Earth reveal a continuum of M, R • Microlensing suggests Radius (R Neptunes are 5 common 0.1 1000 Charbonneau et al. (2009) Charbonneau et al. Mass (MEarth) Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7 Some Highlights and Questions Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8 signature of planethood? vary with mass? Owen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Management, Preservation and the Future of Pds
    DATA MANAGEMENT, PRESERVATION AND THE FUTURE OF PDS Reta Beebe - New Mexico State University, Las Cruces NM Telephone: 575-646-1938 Email: [email protected] Co-Authors Acton, Charles - Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena CA Arvidson, Raymond - Washington University, St Louis MO Bell, Jim -Cornell University, Ithaca NY Boice, Dan - Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX Bolton, Scott - Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX Bougher, Steven -University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI Boynton, William -University of Arizona, Tucson AZ Britt, Daniel -University of Central Florida, Orlando FL Buie, Marc - Southwest Research Institute, Boulder CO Burns, Joseph - Cornell University, Ithaca NY Capria, Maria Teresa – IASF-INAF-Roma/Past chair of IPDA, Rome IT Coradini, Angioletta - IFSI-Roma/PI of Juno/JIRAM, Rosetta/VIRTIS & DAWN/VIR Rome IT Crichton, Daniel - Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena CA Ford, Peter - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA French, Richard - Wellesley College, Wellesley MA Gaddis, Lisa - U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff AZ Gierasch, Peter - Cornell University, Ithaca NY Gladstone, Randy - Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX Gordon, Mitch - SETI Institute, Mountain View CA Greeley, Ronald - Arizona State University, Tempe AZ Hansen, Kenneth - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI Jakosky, Bruce - University of Colorado, Boulder CO Kasaba, Yasumara - Tohoku University/Current Chair of IPDA, Sendai City, JP Khurana, Krishan - University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles CA Kurth, William - University of Iowa, Iowa City IA Law, Emily - Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena CA Lorenz, Ralph - JHU Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore MD Nixon, Conor - Goddard/Univ. of Maryland, Greenbelt. College Park MD Paranicus, Chris - JHU Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore MD Pryor, Wayne - Central Arizona College.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSC-ESF Position Paper—Science-Driven Scenario For
    ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 9, Number 1, 2009 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2007.1226 News & Views ESSC-ESF Position Paper Science-Driven Scenario for Space Exploration: Report from the European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC) Jean-Claude Worms,1 Helmut Lammer,2 Antonella Barucci,3 Reta Beebe,4 Jean-Pierre Bibring,5 Jacques Blamont,6 Michel Blanc,7 Roger Bonnet,8 John R. Brucato,9 Eric Chassefière,10 Angioletta Coradini,11 Ian Crawford,12 Pascale Ehrenfreund,13 Heino Falcke,14 Rupert Gerzer,15 Monica Grady,16 Manuel Grande,17 Gerhard Haerendel,18 Gerda Horneck,15 Bernhard Koch,15 Andreï Lobanov,19 José J. Lopez-Moreno,20 Roberto Marco,21 Peter Norsk,22 Dave Rothery,16 Jean-Pierre Swings,1,25 Cam Tropea,23 Stephan Ulamec,15 Frances Westall,24 and John Zarnecki16 Abstract In 2005 the then ESA Directorate for Human Spaceflight, Microgravity and Exploration (D-HME) commissioned a study from the European Science Foundation’s (ESF) European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC) to exam- ine the science aspects of the Aurora Programme in preparation for the December 2005 Ministerial Conference of ESA Member States, held in Berlin. A first interim report was presented to ESA at the second stakeholders meeting on 30 and 31 May 2005. A second draft report was made available at the time of the final science stake- holders meeting on 16 September 2005 in order for ESA to use its recommendations to prepare the Executive proposal to the Ministerial Conference. The final ESSC report on that activity came a few months after the Min- isterial Conference (June 2006) and attempted to capture some elements of the new situation after Berlin, and in the context of the reduction in NASA’s budget that was taking place at that time; e.g., the postponement sine 1ESSC-ESF, Strasbourg, France.
    [Show full text]
  • SSB 2005 1St Qtr-2.Pub
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF THE SPACE STUDIES BOARD VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1 JANUARY – MARCH 2005 In evaluating the FY2006 budget for SMD the most important FROM THE CHAIR comparison is with expectations. In the FY2004 budget for NASA, which predates the Vision for Space Exploration, space and Earth We are now in budget season. The President has science were projected to have combined budgets of $6.550 billion submitted a FY2006 budget for NASA, and now it is in FY2006, compared with $5.476 in the actual FY2006 request. up to Congress to actually appropriate the funds. Some Even after accounting for the transfer of the Prometheus nuclear of our worse fears about science in NASA have not technology program from SMD to ESMD, SMD would have to been realized in the President’s budget; a healthy share have a larger share of the NASA budget than is now possible to of the agency budget is devoted to science. However, support the FY2006 program that was expected in FY2004, plus the that is only the macroscopic view. When we look in new initiatives for the Moon and Mars. more detail there is the potential for serious damage to Most of the growth that was projected in FY2004 was in space the future of science in NASA and for that matter to the science; Earth science was projected to have a declining budget. In ULLETIN agency as a whole. many ways, Ed Weiler, the former Associate Administrator for Science in the NASA budget appears in two Space Science, was too successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment C
    CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 i DISCLAIMER The Cassini Science Bibliographies is not exhaustive and complete. For all other Cassini related references refer to: Attachment B – References & Bibliographies; the sections entitled References contributed by individual Cassini instrument and discipline teams located in Volume 1 Sections 3.1 and 3.2 Science Results; and other resources outside of the Cassini Final Mission Report. CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 iii CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................................................................... I REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 FROM 2014 CASSINI SENIOR REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 116 Cassini Ground-Breaking Science Publications ................................................................................................. 116 Cassini Special Journal Issues and Books ......................................................................................................... 125 Cassini Special Journal Issues .............................................................................................................. 125 Cassini-related Popular Science Print Publications....................................................................... 125 Peer-Reviewed
    [Show full text]
  • Cassini/Huygens Program Archieve Plan for Science Data
    Cassini / Huygens Program Archive Plan for Science Data PD 699-068 JPL D-15976 Version 3 June 2004 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Appendix A: Archive Plan for Science Data, 699-068, June 2004 Prepared By: ___________________________ Diane Conner, Cassini Program Archive Engineer Approved By: ___________________________ Susan Linick, Cassini Project Instrument Operations Manager ___________________________ Dennis Matson, Cassini Project Scientist ___________________________ Kathryn Weld, Cassini Project Science and Uplink Operations Manager ___________________________ Robert Mitchell, Cassini Program Manager ___________________________ Jean-Pierre Lebreton, Huygens Project Scientist ___________________________ Laverne Hall, Planetary Data System Project Manager Concurred by: ___________________________ Reta Beebe, Planetary Data System Project Scientist ___________________________ Don Sawyer, National Space Science Data Center Manager ___________________________ Denis Bogan, Cassini Program Scientist ___________________________ Mark Dahl, Cassini Program Executive ii Appendix A: Archive Plan for Science Data, 699-068, June 2004 Change Record for 699-068 Revision No. Date Changes Sections Affected Draft 1 7/15/98 First version for review All Draft 2 8/1/98 Minor updates, All Appendix A -- added definition of processing Appendix C -- added Archive schedule Draft 3 9/16/98 Reorganization -- Updated signature page, All replaced references to SO
    [Show full text]
  • 19930013866.Pdf
    Reports MARCH t993 (t_ASA- TM-z_459) REPORTS OF: N93-23055 PLANETARY ASTRONOMy - 1991 142 p Unc I as HI/89 0157836 ! -- •.... = r . - -, r, ...... - ! i j r -- ..... ---- l NASA Technical Memorandum 4459 Reports of Planetary Astronomy_1992 Jurgen Rahe, Editor NASA Office of Space Science and Applications Washington, D. C. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Program 1993 PREFACE This publication is a compilation of summaries of reports written by Principal Investigators funded through the Planetary Astronomy Program of NASA's Solar System Exploration Division, Office of Space Science and Applications. The summaries are designed to provide information about current scientific research projects conducted in the Planetary Astronomy Program in 1991, and to facilitate communication and coordination among scientists in universities, government, and industry. The reports are published as they were submitted by the Principal Investigators and are virtually unedited. They are arranged in alphabetical order. In a second section, highlights of recent accomplishments in planetary astronomy are summarized as they were submitted by the Principal Investigators. The name attached to an individual paragraph is generally the name of the person who submitted that paragraph. Jurgen Rahe Discipline Scientist Planetary Astronomy Program Solar System Exploration Division 1992 PRE_ED4NG P.alGE BLANK NOT FILMED °,. 111 Z 7 = = = Z i CONTENTS Preface ........................................................... """111 vii List of Principal Investigators .......................................... List of Highlights of Recent Accomplishments .............................. XV Summaries of Research Projects ......................................... Highlights of Recent Accomplishments ................................... 111 PR_'/G P_IGF. BL._,r,IK NOT FILMEDv = LIST OF PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Name Organization Title Michael F. A'Hearn University of Maryland Observations of Comets and Asteroids Michael F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon-Mars Program
    November 2004__________________________________________ THE MOON-MARS PROGRAM The cost of overcoming technological challenges Issue could far exceed budgetary projections. Many On January 14, President Bush announced approved science programs could be jeopardized. a new vision for NASA, starting with a human return to the Moon by 2020 to be Executive Summary followed by human exploration of Mars and other destinations. The impact of the Very important science opportunities could be lost or delayed president’s proposal on scientific programs seriously as a consequence of shifting NASA priorities toward within NASA and other agencies could be Moon-Mars. The scientific planning process based on National substantial and must be assessed carefully. Academy consensus studies implemented by NASA roadmaps has Recommendations led to many of NASA’s greatest scientific—and popular— successes. We urge the Federal Government to base priorities for NASA missions on the National Academy recommendations. Extraordinary scientific and technological difficulties confront President’s Bush’s vision for a Moon-Mars initiative. The budget for the proposed program remains APS Executive Board Resolution very imprecise and is expected to grow substantially. The constraints that Reestablishing a human presence on the Moon and sending inevitably will be imposed on other federal astronauts to Mars represents a major national challenge. However scientific programs are already evident, such a program could only achieve its full significance as part of a especially within NASA. Before the balanced program of scientific exploration of the universe and United States commits to President Bush’s proposal, an external review of the plans studies of the interaction between humankind and its environment.
    [Show full text]