MCB Briefing Paper 1 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MCB Briefing Paper 1 1 Briefing Paper Our stand on Multiculturalism, Citizenship, Extremism, & Expectations from the Commission on Integration and Cohesion Prepared by MCB’s Research & Documentation Committee January 2007 MCB Briefing Paper 1 1. Multiculturalism multiculturalism was never just a gift conferred by the powers that be Some countries in Europe, like or civic traditions. It was the hard- France, have a policy of earned outcome of a struggle assimilation in which minority against racism and inequality: cultures are absorbed into the “Multicultural Britain did not come majority culture. Hence sorry out of the much-vaunted British events such as the headscarf affair traditions of fair play, equality and that began in 1989 when three social justice. Rather, it was Muslim girls were forbidden from created out of decades of struggles donning what the authorities against racism by black deemed an ‘ostentatious religious communities - struggles for equal symbol’ in a state school. pay and against discrimination on the shop floor, struggles to make Britain adopted a course of the police protect communities from integration, that was described by racial attack, struggles for children the reforming Home Secretary Roy not to be streamed or bussed out of Jenkins in 1966 as ‘equal schools, struggles to include other 2 opportunity, accompanied by histories in educational curricula” . cultural diversity, in an atmosphere of mutual tolerance'. Anti-racism legislations such as the Race Relations Act (first enacted The MCB’s vision is of a multi- 1976 with subsequent faith, pluralist society with a amendments) were significant conscious policy of recognizing steps in removing the worst that people’s cultural and faith injustices in employment and the identities are not merely a housing sector. private matter, but ones that have public implications. This However by the 1980s one section vision does not imply cultural of society remained marginalised. separatism – the MCB is They were invisible in official committed to engagement and statistics. This was the multi-ethnic working for the common good. Muslim community, who possessed a distinct religio-cultural identity. We support Professor Parekh’s vision of a multicultural society as The Muslim community’s struggle one that respects all cultures and since the 1980s has been one for which values cultural diversity ‘as a parity with the other longer- part of its own self-understanding’1. established faith communities such as Catholics and Jews. It has not Multiculturalism in Britain today is been a campaign for special the outcome of two historical privileges. trends. On the one hand it is the logical development of a liberal For example the campaign to society’s respect for individual obtain voluntary aided status for rights, captured in Roy Jenkins’s statement. However 2 A. Sivanandan, ‘ It's anti-racism that was failed, not multiculturalism that failed’, http://www.irr.org.uk/2005/october/ak000021. 1 B. Parekh, Rethinking Multiculturalism: html cultural diversity and political theory, 2006 MCB Briefing Paper 2 the first Islamic school began in religion was among the top three 1989 and would only end in 19983. bases of their self-description4. The public recognition of this identity The truth seems to be that supports, rather than detracts, from ministers have hidden behind a community cohesion. technicality to avoid the precedent of supporting an Islamic school. As a second generation becomes The long period of agonising before more distant from its roots in the Lady Blatch's [Secretary of State rural Sylheti region of Bangladesh, for Education] announcement the religious identity rather than the suggests that excess capacity was cultural identity is easier to not the chief concern. Rather, the accommodate with being Government was unwilling to take British…In other words, the Muslim the right and fair decision. Some religious identity has been a people will applaud this mechanism for integration - disingenuous behaviour... They cite providing a young educated second fears that girls in Muslim schools generation the way to a dual would face a poorer education, identity as British Muslim. inconsistent with the sexual Tufayl Choudhury, 20065 equality that is meant to underpin the state system. These are dangerous myths, founded in It is a model and a practice that has ignorance...there is no good made Britain unique in the world – educational reason for refusing the bid for the Olympics 2012 government finance to Islamia. The succeeded because Lord Coe decision can only confirm Muslims' could draw on the London’s feeling that they are a persecuted diversity and harmonious minority suffering discrimination. community relations. He could say Ironically, a decision that reflects this because of the efforts of the fears that Muslims will not city’s mayor to engage with diverse assimilate may exacerbate their communities and draw them in as sense of isolation. stake holders. About 45% of The Independent, 20th August 1993 Britain’s 2 million Muslims6 live in London and – in the opinion of Multiculturalism in Britain is thus an many - would not exchange it for ongoing, unfolding movement. It is life in any other city in the world. a process that has evolved through the efforts of the grass roots and clear demonstrations of need. 4 Home Office Research Study 274, ‘Religion The MCB believes that a multi- in England and Wales: findings from the 2001 Home Office Citizenship Survey, Table 3.2. faith, pluralist society is a stronger The other top items were family and society; it makes us all ethnicity/culture. stakeholders. A Home Office 5 Comments made during a debate with survey has found that amongst its Professor Armatya Sen, reported by th ‘Black’ and ‘Asian’ respondents, Madeleine Bunting, 7 December 2006 http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/madeleine _bunting/2006/12/a_challenge_to_amartya_se 3 Islamia Primary School’s campaign, see n.html http://www.salaam.co.uk/education/index.php? 6 Extrapolation based on the 2001 Census file=./ips.php figure of 1.6 million and data on foreign migrant inflow MCB Briefing Paper 3 The East London Mosque in the public sphere; and Whitechapel gives the call to prayer toleration of ‘difference’ in on a public address system – the private sphere something unthinkable in France or - the right to have one’s Germany. Other examples of ‘difference’(minority ethnicity multiculturalism in practice include: etc) recognised and - inclusion of a question on supported in the public and religious affiliation in the Census private spheres - Voluntary-aided status to seven …Multiculturalism requires support Muslim faith schools for both conceptions”.7 - Metropolitan Police’s new uniform dress code We believe most reasonable - Department of Health’s support people in Britain would accept for minority faiths hospital that people should be able to be chaplaincy different, yet treated equally. - Ministry of Defence’s relaxed rules to allow Muslim servicemen to The MCB is aware of the need for wear trimmed beards, catering for accomodation and compromises: dietary needs and the appointment of an imam for chaplaincy work In its dialogue with immigrants, the - Prison Service’s appointment of a liberal society needs to show why it full-time Muslims Advisor deserves their moral - FCO’s support of the British Hajj allegiance….The latter [immigrants] Delegation could legitimately argue that when they are able to offer good reasons Survey after survey have shown for their cultural beliefs and that Muslims see themselves both practices, these should be as British and Muslim, keen to respected and suitably become active citizens and accomodated. .. Such an appeal to comfortable with the multicultural mutual cultural respect has several model. The BBC Multiculturalism advantages. It reassures Poll (August 2005) established that immigrants that their culture is 82% of Muslims believe valued by the wider society and multiculturalism makes Britain a that they need not panic and turn better place to live (62% of the inwards or become intransigent. It national population also hold this reassures the wider society that it view). remains in charge of its cultural affairs, that immigrants can be The MCB is not unaware of the trusted not to undermine it with wider implications of irresponsible demands, and that multiculturalism. An important the relations between the two are aspect has been clarified by based on a rational dialogue Professor Modood: “There seems conducted in a spirit of mutual [then] to be two distinct commitment to a common life. conceptions of equal citizenship, Professor Bhikhu Parekh, 20068 with each based on a different view of what is ‘public’ and what is 7 ‘Clash of Civilisations’? Muslims and the private’… Politics of Multiculturalism in Britain’ , 2001 8 ‘Europe, Liberalism and the ‘Muslim - the right to assimilate to the question’’, in ‘Multiculturalism, Muslims and majority/dominant culture in Citizenship – A European Approach’, Routledge 2006 MCB Briefing Paper 4 Multiculturalism is thus not passive years we’ve focused far too much co-existence or grudging on the ‘multi’ and not enough on tolerance, but interaction offering the common culture. We’ve opportunities for exploration and emphasized what divides us over creativity. Man does not live by what unites us. We have allowed bread alone and there are deeper tolerance of diversity to harden into human needs. From a faith the effective isolation of community’s perspective, the communities, in which some people opportunity to place moral and think special separate values ought spiritual concerns in the public to apply”. 10 In July 2006 he also space – on the public agenda – is explained that “We are becoming also important. more segregated residentially… to the formation of communities that In a multicultural society, are shut off from the outside world; community relations are not that simply makes the situation worse. But that is what we are fostered by the suppression of 11 difference but by the celebration of seeing emerging”.
Recommended publications
  • Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael R. Hogan West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, Michael R., "“Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8264. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8264 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael Robert Hogan Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom, Law, and the Republic
    Scott, Paul Francis (2013) Freedom, law, and the republic. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/4941/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Freedom, Law, and the Republic Paul Francis Scott LLB, LLM Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD School of Law College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow July 2013 Abstract This thesis considers the question of human freedom through the lens of the revival of republican political theory that has taken place in recent decades. In its first part, it distinguishes between different strands of that revival and argues that one of these presents a variant of human freedom which more adequately captures the human condition than does the ideal of freedom traditionally endorsed by liberal thought. It then considers that question of freedom in relation to very fundamental questions of power, law, and the reasons for which we accept the existence of an organised public power in the first place, arguing that the individual finds himself trapped between, on one hand, threats to his freedom which are horizontal, emanating from private parties, and those which are vertical, arising from the apparatus of public power which exists in order to protect man from man.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Denis Macshane
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Denis MacShane Second Report of Session 2012–13 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 31 October 2012 HC 635 Published on 2 November 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) (Chair) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and North Poole) Rt hon Tom Clarke MP (Labour, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Mr Geoffrey Cox MP (Conservative, Torridge and West Devon) Matthew Hancock MP (Conservative, West Suffolk) Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, North East Hertfordshire) Julie Hilling MP (Labour, Bolton West) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • READING REFERENCES JULY 2017 Library and Research
    Council of the European Union General Secretariat READING REFERENCES JULY 2017 Library and Research SUMMER READING SUGGESTIONS Books are surely one of the most important travel companions. So if you hate to be at the seaside (or lakeside or poolside or in fact anywhere) without a book to hand, the Library and Research team recommends some great beach reads. Utopia for realists : and how we can get there / Rutger Bregman. London : Bloomsbury, 2017. 316 p. EN ISBN 9781408890264 Availability Central Library -- Main Collection -- 104304 A noted Dutch journalist and economist proposes an outline for a new worldwide Utopia, with central tenets including a shortened work week, a guaranteed basic income for all, wealth redistribution, and open borders everywhere. Naked diplomacy : power and statecraft in the digital age / Tom Fletcher London : William Collins, 2016. 310 p. EN ISBN 9780008127565 Availability Central Library -- Main Collection -- 103878 Who will be in power in the 21st century? Governments? Big business? Internet titans? And how do we influence the future? In the next 100 years, the world will need to deal with the same amount of social development witnessed in the last 43 centuries - from the rebirth of the city state, the battle for new energy, and disappearing borders, to the desire of the world's people to move to developed nations. Tom Fletcher explores the core principles of a progressive 21st century foreign policy: how to balance interventionism and national interest, use global governance to achieve national objectives and set out an agenda for representative international systems. 02 281 65 25 - [email protected] - JL 02 GH - Mon-Fri.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Voice in Europe: Time for Change
    Britain’s Voice in Europe: Time for Change Rt Hon. Denis MacShane MP Preface by Geoff Hoon December 2005 First published in 2005 by The Foreign Policy Centre 49 Chalton Street London NW1 1HY UNITED KINGDOM Email: [email protected] © Foreign Policy Centre 2005 All rights reserved ISBN-13: 978 1 903558 87 4 ISBN-10: 1 903558 87 5 About the Authors Preface Dr. Denis MacShane is Labour Member of Parliament for Rotherham, and was the Minister of State for Europe at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office until 2005. He first entered Parliament in I am very pleased to provide a foreword to this important contribution a 1994 by-election and served as Private Parliamentary Secretary to to the debate on the future of Europe. Lively, articulate and radical – a succession of ministers in the 1997-2001 Parliament. After the it is all that we would expect from Denis MacShane. 2001 general election, he was made a junior minister at the Foreign Office, becoming the Minister for Europe in 2002. Britain has just completed a successful six month Presidency of the EU. A deal was reached on the budget. Turkey’s membership moved a step closer to reality. And most importantly, the Presidency helped bring to the surface a debate on the challenges Europe will face in the future. Disclaimer As a distinguished Minister for Europe from 2002-2005, Denis The views in this paper are not necessarily those of the Foreign MacShane has used his wide knowledge and experience to provide Policy Centre. a candid assessment of how he sees the current landscape in Europe and to offer a number of practical solutions to improve Britain’s influence and Europe’s effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations and Regions: the Dynamics of Devolution
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Devolution and the Centre Quarterly Report February 2003 by Guy Lodge The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust 1 Contents Contents Key Points 1 Devolution and Westminster 1.1 House of Lords Debate on the Constitution 1.2 New Breakaway Conservative Party 1.3 House of Lords Constitution Committee 1.4 Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill 1.5 Parliamentary Questions to the Wales Office 1.6 The Work of the Territorial Select Committees 1.7 The Work of the Grand Committees 1.8 Select Committee on the Lord Chancellor’s Department 1.9 Minority Party Representation on Select Committees 1.10 Barnett Formula 1.11 House of Lords Reform 2 Devolution and Whitehall 2.1 Edwina Hart accuses Whitehall of obstructing National Assembly 2.2 Helen Liddell Announces Decision on MSP Numbers 2.3 The Future of the Territorial Offices 3 Intergovernmental Relations 3.1 Meeting of JMC (Europe) 3.2 British-Irish Council Summit 3.3 Meeting of the British-Irish Council Environment Group 3.4 Meeting of the British-Irish Council Drugs Group 3.5 UK Government and the Devolved Bodies Launch the Animal Health and Welfare Strategy Consultation 2 Key Points • Assembly Finance Minister Edwina Hart criticises Whitehall civil servants • Lord Norton debate on the British Constitution in the House of Lords • Helen Liddell announces that the number of MSPs will remain at 129 in the outcome of the consultation on the size of the Scottish Parliament. • House of Lords Constitution Committee publishes Devolution: Inter- Institutional Relations in the United Kingdom • House of Lords debate on the Barnett Formula • Second Reading and Committee Stage of the Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill • Seven options for Lords Reform fail to gain a majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Denis Macshane * Britain's Presidency of the European Union. Internal Crisis, External Strength, Economic Movement
    Denis MacShane * Britain’s Presidency of the European Union. Internal Crisis, External Strength, Economic Movement Internationale Politikanalyse Europäische Politik, Juni 2005 ritain did not wish for still less expect to take over The Constitutional Crisis Bthe presidency of the EU at a moment of consider- able tension, if not crisis, for the new EU of 25 mem- Britain’s Presidency of the EU comes at a crucial time in ber states. When Britain first held the Presidency in EU history. The ‘No’ votes in France and the Nether- 1977, there were just 9 EU member states and Britain lands reveal a democratic disconnect between the ide- was seen as the “sick man” of Europe with a poor als and institutions of the EU and the mass of voters in economy, arrogant, over-mighty trade unions who two important countries. Although the noble name sought to dictate the policy of the then Labour gov- “Constitution” was applied to the new Treaty, it is an ernment, and an elderly prime minister on the eve of international treaty and requires ratification by all sig- handing power over to the long 18-year hegemonic natories. The declaration requiring the European rule of the Thatcher-led Conservative Party. ∗ Council to consider what happens if five or more EU Britain held the presidency in 1981, 1986 and 1992 member states reject the Treaty was written in to pro- under the Conservatives. It again held the presidency vide for maverick or special interest rejections in small in January-June 1998 when Tony Blair had been Prime member states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Democratic Left in Europe
    The crisis of the democratic left in Europe Denis MacShane Published by Progress 83Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressonline.org.uk Progress is an organisation of Labour party members which aims to promote a radical and progressive politics for the 21st century. We seek to discuss, develop and advance the means to create a more free, equal and democratic Britain, which plays an active role in Europe and the wider the world. Diverse and inclusive, we work to improve the level and quality of debate both within the Labour party, and between the party and the wider progressive communnity. Honorary President : Rt Hon Alan Milburn MP Chair : StephenTwigg Vice chairs : Rt Hon Andy Burnham MP, Chris Leslie, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Baroness Delyth Morgan, Meg Munn MP Patrons : Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP, Wendy Alexander MSP, Ian Austin MP, Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP, Rt HonYvette Cooper MP, Rt Hon John Denham MP, Parmjit Dhanda MP, Natascha Engel MP, Lorna Fitzsimons, Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, John Healey MP, Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Rt Hon Beverley Hughes MP, Rt Hon John Hutton MP, Baroness Jones, Glenys Kinnock MEP, Sadiq Kahn MP, Oona King, David Lammy MP, Cllr Richard Leese,Rt Hon Peter Mandelson, Pat McFadden MP, Rt Hon David Miliband MP,Trevor Phillips, Baroness Prosser, Rt Hon James Purnell MP, Jane Roberts, LordTriesman. Kitty Ussher MP, Martin Winter Honorary Treasurer : Baroness Margaret Jay Director : Robert Philpot Deputy Director : Jessica Asato Website and Communications Manager :Tom Brooks Pollock Events and Membership Officer : Mark Harrison Publications and Events Assistant : EdThornton Published by Progress 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressives.org.uk 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Parliament
    essays Europe’s parliament: Reform or perish? By Denis MacShane What are we going to do with the European Parliament (EP)? Such a question is normally the beginning of an anti-European diatribe. Not for me. I have spent every year since the first direct elections in 1979 to the Strasbourg Assembly defending its role and purpose. I have knocked on doors in campaigns and defended members of the European Parliament (MEPs) against the gravy-train accusations. As a parliamentary private secretary and a minister at the Foreign Office I worked to integrate MEPs into Britain’s political networking in Europe. I regularly visited the giant EP buildings in Brussels and Strasbourg which contrast to the more homespun modesty of the US Congress or the intimacy of the UK’s House of Commons. But the size of a parliament building does not equate to power or legitimacy. Has the time come for pro- European defenders of the EP to say that it needs reform? All democracies, mature and new, re-examine periodically the way their parliaments are formatted, their size, their mode of election, the composition of their members, their powers in relation to other legislatures and whether they have the confidence of their electorate. Britain has just begun a process of reducing the number of MPs, altering constituencies, and holding a referendum on its voting system. Why should Strasbourg be exempt from such a re-examination? The EU is democratic. But is it a democracy? It cannot join the UN or the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe because it is not a state.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Biographical Notes on Labour Mps, Meps and Peers
    Appendix: Biographical Notes on Labour MPs, MEPs and Peers Abbreviations hp hereditary peer LBLG Leader, British Labour Group LEPLP Leader, European Parliamentary Labour Party LLP Leader of the Labour Party lp life peer MP Member of Parliament MEP Member of the European Parliament (elected since 1979) mep Member of the Commons or Lords delegated to the European Parliament before 1979 PM Prime Minister Albu, Austen (1903–93) MP 48–74 Archer, Peter (1926–) MP 66–92; lp 92 Ardwick, John (Beavan) (1910–94) lp 70; mep 75–79 Ashton, Joe (1933–) MP 68–01 Attlee, Clement (1883–1967) MP 22–55; LLP 35–55; PM 45–51; hp 55 Balfe, Richard (1944–) MEP 79– Barnes, Michael (1932–) MP 66–74 Barnett, Joel (1923–) MP 64–83; lp 83 Becket, Margaret (1943–) MP 83– Benn, Tony (1925–) MP 50–60, 63–83, 84–01 Berry, Roger (1948–) MP 92– Bevan, Aneurin (1897–1960) MP 29–60 Bevin, Ernest (1881–1951) MP 40–51 Bidwell, Sidney (1917–97) MP 66–92 Blair, Tony (1953–) MP 83–; LLP 94–; PM 97– Boothroyd, Betty (1929–) MP 73–2000; mep 75–77 Bradley, Tom (1926–) MP 62–83 (Lab –81; SDP –83) Brown, George (1914–85) MP 45–70; lp 70 Brown, Gordon (1951–) MP 83– Brown, Ron (1921–) MP 64–83 (Lab –81; SDP –83) Bruce, Donald (1912–) MP 45–50; lp 1974–; mep 75–79 Caborn, Richard (1943–) MEP 79–84; MP 83– Callaghan, James (1912–) MP 45–87; LLP 76–81; PM 76–79; lp 87 Castle, Barbara (1910–) MP 45–79; MEP 79–94; LBLG 79–85; lp 79 Castle, Ted (1907–79) lp 74; mep 75–79 Clinton Davis, Stanley (1928–) MP 70–83; EC 85–88; lp 90 Clwyd, Anne (1937–) MEP 79–84; MP 84– Coates, Ken (1930–) MEP
    [Show full text]