DOCSLIB.ORG

“Both Priam and Achilles Are Liberated As a Result of What Priam Does”. Discuss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Both Priam and Achilles Are Liberated As a Result of What Priam Does”. Discuss “Both Priam and Achilles are liberated as a result of what Priam does”. Discuss. Priam’s actions and words temporarily liberate both himself and Achilles, his enemy. A reinterpretation of book 24 of Homer’s epic poem The Iliad, David Malouf’s novel ‘Ransom’ depicts Priam, the king of Troy, going on a journey to ransom the body of his son Hector from Achilles, the man who killed him. Malouf uses natural imagery, flashbacks and flash-forwards to convey meaning in his text. The remarkable actions of Priam touch Achilles’ complex character and allow him to be set free from his tortured mid set. However, in spite of the two men making peace, Priam and Achilles both know that the war will continue, so they are only temporarily liberated. To gain back Hector’s body, Priam empathises with Achilles. On a physically and mentally challenging journey, Priam, with the help of his new herald Somax and the guidance of the gods, arrives in the hut of Achilles. He begs for the corpse of Hector for burial, offering both material wealth and his humility as a ransom. Feeling “emboldened”, Priam appeals to Achilles “as a father” and “as one poor mortal to another” in order to establish empathy with him. Additionally, Priam asserts that if Achilles gives Hector’s body back, it will show that both of them are “men, children of the gods” and “not ravening beasts”. The evocation of their mortality helps Priam remind Achilles that unlike the immortal gods, “death is in our nature” and “the world does not come to us”. Mortals, as they only live once, are able to treasure each other and make the most out of what they have, which is something “the gods know nothing of”. Capitalising on their common woes, Priam uses a series of rhetorical questions. He asks if Achilles would do what Priam is doing for Hector if his own son Neoptolemus was dead and his body continually desecrated. Priam also asks if Peleus, Achilles’ father, would “entreat the killer of his son” if Achilles was in Hector’s place. With these powerful callings of death, sons and fathers, Priam and Achilles connect and with a shared vision of the future, which inspires horror in both men, Achilles agrees to release Hector’s body. Priam is liberated from his role as king by what he does in order to retrieve the body of his son. Having experienced more than he had bargained for on his journey to the Greek camps, Priam, encouraged by the gods and Somax, is able to see beyond his royal sphere and cast off “his old role as kingly”. He acquires a “new-found eye for such irrelevant happenings”, giving Priam “an enlivening effect” which “brings him back into the world with a renewed sense”. Out of mutual respect now provided to each other, Achilles has Priam “treated with the utmost courtesy”, releasing the burden of grief that the old king has been carrying. Malouf portrays the meaning of freedom through water, as Priam is refreshed literally and metaphorically by it. For what he has done, Priam earns an eternal legacy, where “he will be remembered” as “a hero of a deed that till now was never attempted”. Calmed by his deeds, Priam is remade as a new man. Achilles is able to release his grief and rage after Priam empathises with him. After the death of his “brother-in-arms” Patroclus and his revenge on Hector, Patroclus’ killer, Achilles is filled with rage at both the Trojan prince and himself for not being able to save his friend. He has consistently for nine days desecrated Hector’s body and in a manner similar to a temporal Sisyphean punishment, repeats his mutilation of his enemy’s corpse as the gods refresh it each morning. A complex character, filled with grief and anger, he is unable to let go of his vengeful spirit until he is comforted by the words of Priam, the father of his “implacable enemy” Hector. In his hut, when Priam appears before him, Achilles is so overwhelmed by his grief and longing that he first he sees Priam as Patroclus and then his father Peleus. As their interaction proceeds, Achilles is exposed and intrigued by Priam, who jogs the warrior’s “soft affections” that he has both for his son Neoptolemus and Peleus. The calling on of his family by Priam moves Achilles deeply, as he “feels immobilised and out of time”. Furthermore, when the vision is shared between Priam and him of “the end of things in the days after his death”, Achilles is stunned by what he sees. He accepts Priam’s ransom and demands nothing more. Priam’s astounding actions free Achilles from his desire for revenge, forgives Hector and recognises that he had “won an honourable death” and is “no longer an affront”. The result of Achilles’ reconciliation with Hector leaves the two warriors “in perfect amity”. Thanks to Priam, Achilles overcomes his emotive state and make peace with his fate, which is to die at Troy. Despite appearing to have reconciled with one another, both Priam and Achilles recognise that the war will still go on. This is shown earlier on in Priam’s interaction with Achilles. The symbolisation of Achilles’ hand resting on his sword reminds Prim that Achilles is a soldier and “retains a terrible potential”. Even though the novel expresses the idea of chance, Malouf notes how some things are subject to fate, such as the death of Achilles and the fall of Troy. Supporting Malouf’s contention, Priam and Achilles witness the future, where in a bitter twist of irony, Priam is slain by Achilles’ son Neoptolemus, the “fiery-headed agent of such destructiveness”, even though the two men have made peace. Moreover, when Achilles promises to come to Priam’s aid when “the walls of Troy are falling”, Priam retorts and ironically predicts that Achilles will be “already among the shades”. Even though they both see the dark futures in store or them and know the war continues, Priam and Achilles are left “smiling in the foreknowledge of what they have already seen” and depart from each other on good terms. The actions of Priam manage to free both Achilles and himself from their roles and burdens, even though it is only temporarily. Some of the key messages in Malouf’s novel ‘Ransom’ are that people can establish common bonds despite the horrors of war. Ultimately, the inevitability of war overwhelms the lives of the people involved. ‘Ransom’ shows that liberation can occur on a personal level even in the dire situation of conflict. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Essay 2 Sample Responses
    Classics / WAGS 23: Second Essay Responses Grading: I replaced names with a two-letter code (A or B followed by another letter) so that I could read the essays anonymously. I grouped essays by levels of success and cross-read those groups to check that the rankings were consistent. Comments on the assignment: Writers found all manner of things to focus on: Night, crying, hospitality, the return of princes from the dead (Hector, Odysseus), and the exchange of bodies (Hector, Penelope). Here are four interesting and quite different responses: Essay #1: Substitution I Am That I Am: The Nature of Identity in the Iliad and the Odyssey The last book of the Iliad, and the penultimate book of the Odyssey, both deal with the issue of substitution; specifically, of accepting a substitute for a lost loved one. Priam and Achilles become substitutes for each others' absent father and dead son. In contrast, Odysseus's journey is fraught with instances of him refusing to take a substitute for Penelope, and in the end Penelope makes the ultimate verification that Odysseus is not one of the many substitutes that she has been offered over the years. In their contrasting depictions of substitution, the endings of the Iliad and the Odyssey offer insights into each epic's depiction of identity in general. Questions of identity are in the foreground throughout much of the Iliad; one need only try to unravel the symbolism and consequences of Patroclus’ donning Achilles' armor to see how this is so. In the interaction between Achilles and Priam, however, they are particularly poignant.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Preliminarily Approving Class Action Settlement
    Case 1:17-cv-03048-SDA Document 112 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Local 1180, Communications Workers Of 4/12/2019 America, AFL‐CIO et al, 1:17‐cv‐03048 (SDA) Plaintiffs, ‐against‐ City Of New York et al, Defendants. ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge. WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs and Defendants have entered into a Stipulation Of Class Action Settlement And Proposed Preliminary Order Of Approval (hereinafter “Stipulation of Settlement”); and WHEREAS, this Stipulation of Settlement, together with its attached Appendices, sets forth the terms and conditions of the proposed settlement and dismissal with prejudice of this action; and WHEREAS, the Court has before it Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order Preliminarily Approving the Stipulation of Class Action Settlement And Proposed Preliminary Order of Approval which includes the Stipulation of Settlement, Memorandum of Law and Declaration in Support, together with the supporting materials; and 1 Case 1:17-cv-03048-SDA Document 112 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 84 WHEREAS, the Court is satisfied that the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement were the result of good faith, arm’s length settlement negotiations between competent and experienced counsel for both Plaintiffs and Defendants. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Capitalized terms used in this Order have the meanings assigned to them in the Stipulation of Settlement and this Order. 2. The terms of the parties’ Stipulation of Settlement are hereby conditionally approved, subject to further consideration thereof at the final approval hearing (hereinafter the “Fairness Hearing”) provided for below.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective on Revenge and Justice in Homer Judith Stanton Bridgewater State College
    Bridgewater Review Volume 2 | Issue 2 Article 13 Mar-1984 Research Note: A New Perspective on Revenge and Justice in Homer Judith Stanton Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Stanton, Judith (1984). Research Note: A New Perspective on Revenge and Justice in Homer. Bridgewater Review, 2(2), 26-27. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol2/iss2/13 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Cultural Commentary Continued table for more moves, brings it out a third RESEARCH NOTE time for a last look and then manipulates it for the last time under the table, finally achieving cubical perfection. A New Perspective on Revenge Is this game playing spirit, native to all of us, at the heart of mathematics? Is and Justice in Homer Judith Stanton mathematics a sort of game, albeit with Assistant Professor of English serious applications? I think that it is. I am reminded of Jacob Bronowski who Most of us are aware that our idea of considers this question in his beautiful work, justice comes largely from Ancient Greece. so optimistic for mankind, The Ascent of But we might be surprised at how old Greek Man. At one point Bronowski is explaining justice really is. Classical Athens (490·323 symmetry in nature and art. He takes us to B.C.), to which we owe much of our the Alhambra, where in the baths of the understanding of justice, was itself heir to a harem we see motifs of "wind-swept" system of revenge justice that was older still triangles in perfect hexagonal collaboration -- perhaps as old as Hie Mycenaean period filling the walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer and Greek Epic
    HomerHomer andand GreekGreek EpicEpic INTRODUCTION TO HOMERIC EPIC (CHAPTER 4.IV) • The Iliad, Books 23-24 • Overview of The Iliad, Books 23-24 • Analysis of Book 24: The Death-Journey of Priam •Grammar 4: Review of Parts of Speech: Nouns, Verbs, Adjectives, Adverbs, Pronouns, Prepositions and Conjunctions HomerHomer andand GreekGreek EpicEpic INTRODUCTION TO HOMERIC EPIC (CHAPTER 4.IV) Overview of The Iliad, Book 23 • Achilles holds funeral games in honor of Patroclus • these games serve to reunite the Greeks and restore their sense of camaraderie • but the Greeks and Trojans are still at odds • Achilles still refuses to return Hector’s corpse to his family HomerHomer andand GreekGreek EpicEpic INTRODUCTION TO HOMERIC EPIC (CHAPTER 4.IV) Overview of The Iliad, Book 24 • Achilles’ anger is as yet unresolved • the gods decide he must return Hector’s body • Zeus sends Thetis to tell him to inform him of their decision • she finds Achilles sulking in his tent and he agrees to accept ransom for Hector’s body HomerHomer andand GreekGreek EpicEpic INTRODUCTION TO HOMERIC EPIC (CHAPTER 4.IV) Overview of The Iliad, Book 24 • the gods also send a messenger to Priam and tell him to take many expensive goods to Achilles as a ransom for Hector’s body • he sneaks into the Greek camp and meets with Achilles • Achilles accepts Priam’s offer of ransom and gives him Hector’s body HomerHomer andand GreekGreek EpicEpic INTRODUCTION TO HOMERIC EPIC (CHAPTER 4.IV) Overview of The Iliad, Book 24 • Achilles and Priam arrange an eleven-day moratorium on fighting
    [Show full text]
  • The Father-Son Relationship in the Iliad: the Case of Priam- Hector Introduction
    Tsoutsouki, C. (2014); The Father-Son Relationship in the Iliad: The Case of Priam- Hector Introduction Rosetta 16: 78 – 92 http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/issue16/tsoutsouki.pdf The Father-Son Relationship in the Iliad: The Case of Priam-Hector Introduction Christiana Tsoutsouki It is widely accepted that the Iliad is not merely a tale of the Trojan War and its battles, but also a literary product that yields interesting insights into the nature of human interactions. Arguably, one of the most prominent expressions of these interactions is the father-son relationship, through which the epic narrative keeps constantly at the background the existence of a world beyond the battlefield, where fathers and sons engage in a tense and intimate interaction characterised by mutual feelings of love, affection, concern, and, most importantly, interdependency. The significance of the Iliadic father-son relationship has already been noted by a number of scholars. Greene (1970) was the first to draw attention to this topic by aptly characterising the Iliad as ‘a great poem of fatherhood’, and a few years later Lacey observed ‘how completely family-centred the society of Homeric poems is’ (1968: 34). Likewise, Redfield (1975), and Finlay (1980) examined the prevalence of the father- son bond in the epic narrative, while Griffin (1980) focused on the theme of the bereaved parents. Crotty (1994) dealt with different epic pairs of fathers and sons, being particularly concerned with the standards that the former impose on the latter. Interestingly, Ingalls (1998) centred on the attitudes towards children in the epic and argued for their high value in the Homeric society.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Questions Helen of Troycomp
    Study Questions Helen of Troy 1. What does Paris say about Agamemnon? That he treated Helen as a slave and he would have attacked Troy anyway. 2. What is Priam’s reaction to Paris’ action? What is Paris’ response? Priam is initially very upset with his son. Paris tries to defend himself and convince his father that he should allow Helen to stay because of her poor treatment. 3. What does Cassandra say when she first sees Helen? What warning does she give? Cassandra identifies Helen as a Spartan and says she does not belong there. Cassandra warns that Helen will bring about the end of Troy. 4. What does Helen say she wants to do? Why do you think she does this? She says she wants to return to her husband. She is probably doing this in an attempt to save lives. 5. What does Menelaus ask of King Priam? Who goes with him? Menelaus asks for his wife back. Odysseus goes with him. 6. How does Odysseus’ approach to Priam differ from Menelaus’? Who seems to be more successful? Odysseus reasons with Priam and tries to appeal to his sense of propriety; Menelaus simply threatened. Odysseus seems to be more successful; Priam actually considers his offer. 7. Why does Priam decide against returning Helen? What offer does he make to her? He finds out that Agamemnon sacrificed his daughter for safe passage to Troy; Agamemnon does not believe that is an action suited to a king. Priam offers Helen the opportunity to become Helen of Troy. 8. What do Agamemnon and Achilles do as the rest of the Greek army lands on the Trojan coast? They disguise themselves and sneak into the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer – the Iliad
    HOMER – THE ILIAD Homer is the author of both The Iliad and The Odyssey. He lived in Ionia – which is now modern day Turkey – between the years of 900-700 BC. Both of the above epics provided the framework for Greek education and thought. Homer was a blind bard, one who is a professional story teller, an oral historian. Epos or epic means story. An epic is a particular type of story; it involves one with a hero in the midst of a battle. The subject of the poem is the Trojan War which happened approximately in 1200 BC. This was 400 years before the poem was told by Homer. This story would have been read aloud by Homer and other bards that came after him. It was passed down generation to generation by memory. One can only imagine how valuable memory was during that time period – there were no hard drives or memory sticks. On a tangential note, one could see how this poem influenced a culture; to be educated was to memorize a particular set of poems or stories which could be cross-referenced with other people’s memory of those particular stories. The information would be public and not private. The Iliad is one of the greatest stories ever told – a war between two peoples; the Greeks from the West and the Trojans from the East. The purpose of this story is to praise Achilles. The two worlds are brought into focus; the world of the divine order and the human order. The hero of the story is to bring greater order and harmony between these two orders.
    [Show full text]
  • On History and Political Thought in Homer's Iliad, with a Focus on Books
    Defining Politics: On History and Political Thought in Homer’s Iliad, With a Focus on Books 1-9 by Andrew M. Gross A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Andrew M. Gross 2017 Defining Politics: On History and Political Thought in Homer’s Iliad, With a Focus on Books 1-9 Andrew M. Gross Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2017 ii Abstract The Iliad is a work of great literary complexity that contains profound insights and a wide- ranging account of the human condition. Some of the most important recent scholarly work on the poem has also emphasized the political dimension of Homer’s account. In this dissertation, I aim to contribute to our understanding of the Iliad as a work of political thought. Focusing on books 1 through 9 of the Iliad, I will try to show how we can discover in it a consistent chronological or historical account, even though at many points that history is not presented in a linear way, in the poem itself. Through various references we are able to discern an historical account of the entire cosmic order. Homer focuses on the newly established Olympian gods and, therewith, their need to enforce the crucial separation between themselves and human beings: that is, between their own status as immortals, and our condition as mortals. Homer’s history of the Trojan War, in turn, conveys crucial lessons about politics and the human condition. The dissertation traces the history of the war as it emerged from a private struggle and developed into a public war.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer the Iliad
    1 Homer The Iliad Translated by Ian Johnston Open access: http://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/homer/iliadtofc.html 2010 [Selections] CONTENTS I THE QUARREL BY THE SHIPS 2 II AGAMEMNON'S DREAM AND THE CATALOGUE OF SHIPS 5 III PARIS, MENELAUS, AND HELEN 6 IV THE ARMIES CLASH 6 V DIOMEDES GOES TO BATTLE 6 VI HECTOR AND ANDROMACHE 6 VII HECTOR AND AJAX 6 VIII THE TROJANS HAVE SUCCESS 6 IX PEACE OFFERINGS TO ACHILLES 6 X A NIGHT RAID 10 XI THE ACHAEANS FACE DISASTER 10 XII THE FIGHT AT THE BARRICADE 11 XIII THE TROJANS ATTACK THE SHIPS 11 XIV ZEUS DECEIVED 11 XV THE BATTLE AT THE SHIPS 11 XVI PATROCLUS FIGHTS AND DIES 11 XVII THE FIGHT OVER PATROCLUS 12 XVIII THE ARMS OF ACHILLES 12 XIX ACHILLES AND AGAMEMNON 16 XX ACHILLES RETURNS TO BATTLE 16 XXI ACHILLES FIGHTS THE RIVER 17 XXII THE DEATH OF HECTOR 17 XXIII THE FUNERAL GAMES FOR PATROCLUS 20 XXIV ACHILLES AND PRIAM 20 I THE QUARREL BY THE SHIPS [The invocation to the Muse; Agamemnon insults Apollo; Apollo sends the plague onto the army; the quarrel between Achilles and Agamemnon; Calchas indicates what must be done to appease Apollo; Agamemnon takes Briseis from Achilles; Achilles prays to Thetis for revenge; Achilles meets Thetis; Chryseis is returned to her father; Thetis visits Zeus; the gods con-verse about the matter on Olympus; the banquet of the gods] Sing, Goddess, sing of the rage of Achilles, son of Peleus— that murderous anger which condemned Achaeans to countless agonies and threw many warrior souls deep into Hades, leaving their dead bodies carrion food for dogs and birds— all in fulfilment of the will of Zeus.
    [Show full text]
  • T H E R S I T E S
    T H E R S I T E S THERSITES: Homer’s Ugliest Man Nathan Dane II with an Afterword by the editors Copyright © 2018 FreeReadPress All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned,or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Los Angeles: FreeReadPress Printed in the United States of America ISBN-13: 978-1724622389 ISBN-10: 1724622382 Thersites How came I here among the Shades, the butt Of Homer’s tongue in life, his adversary in death? How odd to be the object of ridicule, Marked with scorn for my poor body’s faults, Hated for the frankness of my speech! Though from heroic stock, I did not play The hero’s part. My all-too-normal instincts Roused my heart against the selfish kings, But I, poor fool, was tripped by arrogance And stumbled to my doom. I did not know That often men refuse a helping hand And damn their benefactor’s kind intent. I thought to take their part–or was I blinded By my own self-seeking soul? If so, Perhaps I do deserve to rot beyond The earth’s far rim and play a proverb role As Shakespeare’s crude buffoon. And yet if I But had it all to do again, I would. v Nathan Dane II Thersites The day would soon be bright, as the sun was climbing behind the sandstone peaks opposite where we had spent the night. Already the mists in the distant valley below showed tinges of pink and gold. Here and there silver streaks of the winding river threaded their way through green patches to the sea that lay beyond the grim towers of Calydon, the seat of power of Oeneus, my aging uncle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Emotions in Modern Receptions of Homeric Epic
    Tales for All Time: The Role of Emotions in Modern Receptions of Homeric Epic Karen Anne Possingham January 2021 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University © Copyright by Karen Anne Possingham 2021 All Rights Reserved 1 This thesis is the original work of the author. Word count: 98,683. 2 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to acknowledge that this research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. My primary supervisor, Elizabeth Minchin, the Best of the Homerists, whose inspiration, support, and dedication helped bring out the best in my work. My secondary supervisors Greta Hawes and Lucy Neave for their sound advice, scholarship and kind encouragement. To my children Nick and Alex, their partners Steph and Tiah, colleagues at ANU and friends for seeing the world through Homer with me for the last four and a half years. Finally, my husband Hugh for his continued patronage of the Arts and for his pithy and witty remarks on the content and progress of this thesis. 3 Abstract The poet we call Homer stands at the intersection of a long oral tradition and the emergence of literacy. The poems associated with his name have exercised a continuing appeal, across time; and yet they can also be unsettling, challenging our ideas of Ancient Greek values and expectations. This has had an impact on the reception of the poems from antiquity to the present day. I have argued in this thesis that, in the cases I have studied, Lorna Hardwick’s idea of ‘faultlines’ in Homeric epic can be adapted to examine the powerful, often contradictory, emotions portrayed in the Iliad and the Odyssey: namely personal and place attachment, grief, and the anger that can lead to acts of retribution or to acts of mercy that rely on the emotion of pity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Movements of the Iliad Heiden, Bruce Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1996; 37, 1; Proquest Pg
    The three movements of the Iliad Heiden, Bruce Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1996; 37, 1; ProQuest pg. 5 The Three Movements of the Iliad Bruce Heiden HE ILIAD FOR US is a text to be read; for its composer, his audiences, and several generations of audiences after them, T it was a live vocal performance. Scholars of Greek epic and related genres have become increasingly sensitive to the losses in affect and significance that occur when such a per­ formance survives only in the form of its 'libretto'.! But for students of Homer the desire to recapture the power of the per­ formed Iliad confronts the silence of the historical record: the first traces of performances of Homer date from the mid-sixth century, perhaps more than a century after the epic's compo­ sition.2 Denys Page probably spoke for many in declining to speculate about how the questions concerning Homeric per­ formance might be answered. 3 Others have been less cautious. The issue of the performance structure of the Iliad has proven an especially fertile ground of speculation, because the evident 1 For recent theoretical discussion of these losses and efforts to recuperate them, see J. M. Foley, The Singer of Tales in Performance (Bloomington 1995) 1-59. 2 The view that our Iliad is the result of a major revision that occurred in sixth-century Athens has gained adherents during the past two decades: M. S. Jensen, The Homeric Question and the Ora/-Formulaic Theory (Copenhagen 1980); K. STANLEY, The Shield of Homer (Princeton 1993: hereafter 'Stanley') 279-93; R.
    [Show full text]