Current Situation and Future Perspectives of Ethnoichthyology in Brazil

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ethnobiology and Conservation, 10:09 (2021) doi:10.15451/ec2020-11-10.09-1-35 ISSN 2238-4782 ethnobioconservation.com

Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil

Daniel da Silva Ladislau1,2,∗; Pauliana Le˜aode Souza1,3; Paulo Henrique Rocha Aride4; Adriano Teixeira de Oliveira4 and Eder´ Andr´eGubiani1,2

ABSTRACT

Ethnoichthyology has been highlighting in several regions of the world, due to the collaboration of studies that seek to understand the traditional or local ecological knowledge about different uses and meanings of fish among different human groups. Therefore, we present a systematic review of the literature concerning the current situation of ethnoichthyological studies in Brazil. We examine the temporal and spatial citation trends in Brazil, as well as who are the research actors and the thematic areas covered in the articles. In all, 177 published articles related to the topic were found in Brazil. The number of published articles increased significantly in time, with most studies concentrated in the Northeast Region of the country (44.4%), especially in the state of Bahia (16.8%). The types of aquatic environments include both marine and freshwater, such as sea (46.3%) and rivers (70.2%). The articles mainly rely on the collaboration of artisanal fisherman (74.3%). The topic most frequently addressed in the studies was bio-ecological aspects of fish (33.8%). On the other hand, studies on morphological aspects (2.7%) represented the less frequently among the thematic areas. We concluded that ethnoichthyology is increasing significantly in Brazil. However, some issues needed to be better understand, especially the knowledge of the recreational fishermen, the morphological aspects of the fish species by local fishermen and there are few studies in South and Midwest in Brazil, which will indicate the future efforts to improve the species conservation and the resource management.

Keywords: Ethnobiology; Ethnozoology; Ethnosciences.

1 Programa de Pós-Gradua¸cãoem Recursos Pesqueiros e Engenharia de Pesca, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná,Toledo, PR, Rua da Faculdade, 645, Jardim La Salle, 85903-000, Brazil. 2 Grupo de Pesquisas em Recursos Pesqueiros e Liminologia, Instituto Neotropical de Pesquisas Ambientais, Toledo, PR, Rua da Faculdade, 645, Jardim La Salle, 85903-000, Brazil. 3 Grupo de Estudos de Manejo na Aquicultura, Toledo, PR, Rua da Faculdade, 645, Jardim La Salle, 85903-000, Brazil. 4 Instituto Federal de Educa¸cão,Ciênciae Tecnologia do Amazonas, Campus Centro, Manaus, AM, Av. Sete de Setembro, 1975, Centro, 69020-120, Brazil.

* Corresponding author . E-mail address: DSL ([email protected]), PLS ([email protected]), PHRA ([email protected]), ATO ([email protected]), EAG´ ([email protected])

1 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Ethnoichthyology has been emerging in several regions around the world in an attempt to understand the different uses and meanings of fish. We realized a systematic review of the literature concerning the current situation of ethnoichthyology in Brazil. We recorded a significantly temporal increase in the number of published papers and they are concentrated in the Northeast of Brazil. However, little studies have been realized on fish morphological aspects. As a recommendation, emphasis should be applied on understand the knowledge of the recreational fishermen and the morphological aspects of the fish species by local fishermen. Thus, we hope that it will serve as support for researchers, professors, students and stakeholders in future projects that involve interactions between men and fish.

INTRODUCTION the criteria for the classification and use of fish by fishermen in the middle Tocantins River. Ethnoscience is a very useful approach for under- Ethnoichthyology has been considered by some standing the knowledge that human communities has Brazilian scientists as a new line of research that has about the environment where they live (Ramires and been gaining prominence in the country (Alves and Barrella 2004). Among the different areas of ethno- Souto 2011; Silvano 2013). In addition, this subject science is ethnozoology, which aims to study the dif- has been contributed significantly to the management ferent types of interactions between people and fauna of fisheries resources and to improve the implementa- throughout history (Alves and Souto 2015). Thus, tion of the fisheries management plans (Begossi et al. ethnoichthyology, a subdiscipline of ethnozoology, has 2011, 2012; Medeiros et al. 2018; Silvano and Valbo- been emerging in several regions around the world Jorgensen 2008). This is especially true for generating (Castillo et al. 2018; Jácome-Negrete2012; Olar- relevant information regarding the ecological and bi- inmoye and Olarinmoye 2013; Ruiz-Velásquezet al. ological aspects of fish species, both in marine and 2017) in an attempt to understand the different uses freshwater environments throughout Brazil (Silvano and meanings of fish, especially the cognitive and be- 2013). havioral aspects of interactions, in different human For that matter, Brazil is a country with a rich bi- groups (Costa-Neto et al. 2002; Marques 2012). ological and cultural diversity, a favorable scenario for In this way, the first studies with an ethnoichthy- the study of the relations between people and animals ological approach were carried out by Morrill (1967) (Alves and Souto 2011). However, ethnoichthyology and Anderson Jr. (1967). Morrill’s (1967) article ad- studies in the country are still recent and are concen- dressed fishermen’s knowledge of the ecological, taxo- trated in a few regions (Alves and Souto 2011; Silvano nomic, behavioral and toxicological aspects of marine 2013). In addition, much of the information surround- fish in St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. Morrill’s used ing this ethnoscience is still inconsistent, making it the term “ethnoichthyology”, following the model of difficult to assess the increase achieved over the past ethnobotanical studies (Marques 2012). In addition, few years, as well as the obstacles faced. Making it Anderson Jr. (1967) evaluated the nomenclature and necessary to conduct a study that answers such ques- taxonomy of fish used by Hong Kong fishermen using tions, as it will contribute to the development of fu- ethnographic tools aimed at studying the classifica- ture studies, demonstrating the main thematic areas tion of items, language events and thoughts. This employed and how studies in the area are established, was due to the influence of increased anthropological in addition to pointing out which regions are less at- studies directed at the native classification and termi- tended, thus directing researchers to new study ar- nology systems of his time. Since then, both studies eas, which will be able to generate new information have become references for ethnoichthyologists world- referring to fish species from different aquatic environ- wide. ments and describe the different ways of using fishing As a consequence, in Brazil, ethnoichthyology be- resources by local human populations. gan to stand out in the mid-1970s. The seminal pa- Given the gaps highlighted above, the purpose of per was published by Maranhão(1975) on which him this paper was to perform a systematic literature re- evaluated the decision to navigate, the classification view to evaluate the current situation of ethnoichthy- of the tides and the identification of the productive ology in Brazil and, in addition, to direct future re- fishing areas by fishermen from the community of searches. Specifically, we intend to answer the follow- Icara´ı, Ceará. This research became innovative for ing questions: i) What is the temporal trend in the Brazilian ethnoichthyologists. However, only since publications on ethnoichthyology studies in Brazil? ii) the early 1990s has ethnoichthyology increased sub- How is the number of publications distributed among stantially (Marques 2012). In particular, it has been the different regions of Brazil? iii) What types of driven by Begossi and Garavello (1990), who analyzed aquatic environments have been studied? iv) Who are

2 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

the research actors? and v) What are the thematic nitive and behavioral knowledge of the human popu- areas covered in the articles? lation on the various uses and meanings of ichthyofaunistic resources”; b) the objective of the study should be directly or indirectly related to the uses and mean- MATERIAL AND METHODS ings of fish for the human population; and finally, c) the study should be carried out in Brazil. One hun- Search strategy dred seventy seven articles (Figure1) that met the In February 2020, a systematic review with a abovementioned criteria were selected and included in keyword-driven approach was performed using the our systematic review. The publication inclusion pro- databases of the following platforms: Google Scholar cess followed the PRISMA guidelines, which include (scholar.google.com.br), Scopus (scopus.com), Co- recommendations to follow when conducting system- ordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement atic reviews such as criteria for searching publications (CAPES Periodicals); and Web of Science (apps- and inclusion or exclusion of studies (Moher et al. webofknowledge), searching for all publications that 2009). addressed the topic of “ethnoichthyology in Brazil”. On the Web of Science and Scopus platforms, the Data collection and analysis search terms in the ”Topic” field were as follows: (Brazil*) AND (etnoichthyol*) AND (fish*) AND We systematically evaluated the publications us- (knowledge) AND (ethnotaxonomy), and the period ing 17 quantitative steps for summarizing the current in which the publications were searched from January situation of ethnoichthyology in Brazil, as described 1990 (the decade of the first publication in Brazil) to in Table1. Some papers were classified in more than February 2020. While for searches with the CAPES one category; as a result, the data presented herein Periodicals and Google Scholar platforms, the fol- do not necessarily represent the number of papers. lowing search terms were used in Portuguese: eth- Rather, they include the information extracted in the noichthyology, fisherman ethno-knowledge, fish eth- studies, because not all the publications presented all nobiology, fisherman’s perception in Brazil, local eco- the information of interest. Also, the numbers in- logical knowledge of fisherman, knowledge of Brazilian cluded in the analyses are not always the same, be- fisherman, and ethnotaxonomy of fish in Brazil. The cause papers were counted multiple times when nec- terms fisherman and fisherwoman were also tested in essary (e.g., some studies were carried out in more combination with the keywords. than one region, environment, research actors or the- In addition, we used the All Databases level to matic area) (the total number of data per analysis is maximize the number of studies available in the available in Additional files1 and2). In this case, we databases (e.g., all environment types, all regions, and chose to record the relative frequency of information all types of publications). All database searches may for both categories. include not only journal articles but also other types In order to present the results, the 17 categories such as conference papers and book chapters. This were summarized in five quantitative variables as fol- resulted in an initial pool of 556 publications (Figure low: 1) Year was used to determine time trend in 1). Then, we refined the search by removing dupli- publications on ethnoichthyology in Brazil. 2) Region cates. This step produced 442 publications (Figure of Brazil (South, Southeast, Midwest, Northeast and 1). After this, we screened the abstracts to identify North) was evaluated to show the geographical range whether the publication met our criteria. of ethnoichthyological publications. 3) Aquatic environment was examined to determine the environment types in which ethnoichthyological studies are most Selection criteria frequently carried out. 4) Research actors were iden- Non-related articles with ethnoichthyology in tified to determine who are the people most frequently Brazil were excluded based on the title, abstract, or, studied in ethnoichthyological papers. And finally, 5) if necessary, after a careful reading of the entire text. thematic areas were registered to suggest key areas Previous reviews and meta-analysis, publications in needed for improving to direct future researches in the format of congress abstracts, course completion Brazil. papers, dissertations and theses were excluded. Sub- sequently, we reviewed the full text of 294 studies RESULTS (Figure1). Some publications were excluded in sub- sequent steps if they did not meet our three criteria In all, 177 published articles related to eth- as follows: a) the article should fit the concept of noichthyology in Brazil were recorded from January ethnoichthyology defined by Marques (2012), which 1990 to February 2020 (List of articles included in the states that “ethnoichthyology is the study of the cog- systematic review in Supplementary material2). The

3 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

Figure 1. Flowchart of the process of identification, selection and eligibility of studies for systematic review. number of published papers increased significantly, in (8.4%) and Pará(8.4%), Santa Catarina (5.7%) and a way exponentially, in time (nonlinear adjustment; Para´ıba(5.3%) also have recorded a high number of r = 0.81; p < 0.01; Figure2), with the number of published papers on ethnoichthyology compared to published papers increasing by seven articles by year that of other Brazilian states (Figure3b). Most stud- (Figure2). Most studies were carried out from 2000 ies were carried out in marine environments (57.7%). to 2018, reaching a peak in 2016, with 22 published These studies were concentrated in the coastal region, articles (Figure2). more precisely at inshore sites (Figure4a) while few The first articles on ethnoichthyology in Brazil studies have been carried out in coastal lagoons and were published in 1990, and only two papers were reefs (5.5% and 4.6%, respectively; Figure4a). On the published in that decade. Since then, several studies other hand, fewer studies were performed in freshwa- have been developed in different Brazilian geographic ter environments (42.2%), most of which were car- regions (Figure3a). Our results revealed that the ried out in rivers (Figure4b) and only 2.3% were per- largest number of published articles on ethnoichthy- formed in streams (Figure4b). ology occurred in the Northeast Region of the country Fishermen accounted for the largest share (94.6%) (44.4%; Figure 3a). On the other hand, the South and of research actors in ethnoichthyological surveys, es- Midwest Regions had the lowest percentage of pub- pecially artisanal fishermen (74.3%; Figure5). Other lished articles (11.1% and 3.5%, respectively; Figure types of fishermen, such as traditional (16.5%) and 3a). recreational (3.7%), had minor participatory roles in The largest number of articles by state was studies. In addition, other important players in the recorded from Bahia (16.8%; Figure3b). However, development of ethnoichthyology, such as fish traders SãoPaulo (11.1%), Rio de Janeiro (8.8%), Amazonas and consumers (2.1%), students (2.1%) and teachers

4 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

Figure 2. Temporal trend in the number of published articles on ethnoichthyological issues in Brazil from January 1990 to February 2020.

Figure 3. Percentage (represented by diﬀerent shades of colors, blue in (a) and diﬀerent colors by region in (b)) of ethnoichthyological studies by region (a) and Federative Unit (UFs) of Brazil (b) evaluated from January 1990 to February 2020. The numbers in parentheses indicate the numbers of studies by place. As some studies involved more than one region, the total number in parentheses does not represent the total number of papers.

5 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

Table 1: Categories and variables used in systematic analysis.

Categories Data variables Temporal distribution of eth- year of publication as indicated in the article. noichthyological studies in Brazil Percentage of production by re- the location of the study described in the article was considered. gions and Federative Units (UFs) in Brazil Marine environment sea, estuary, bay, beach, coastal lagoon, reef Freshwater environment river, lake, reservoir (supply or generation of energy), stream Artisanal fisherman professional fishermen, subsistence fishermen, ornamental fish fisherman, fisherman and farmer, specialist fishermen, tour guides, riverine people Traditional fisherman artisanal fishermen belonging to indigenous, quilombola and caiˇzara (traditional inhabitants of the coast of the Southeast and South regions of Brazil) populations Recreational fisherman amateur fisherman, sport fisherman (catch and releasing), scuba diver Trader fish/Consumer traders and consumers interviewed at fish markets and fairs Student elementary, high school or university students Researcher/Teacher researchers or teachers from public educational institutions Bio-ecological aspects of fish aspects of feeding, reproduction, behavior, trophic interactions, migra- tory movements, habitats, mortality, growth, time-space distribution Environmental changes environmental impacts motivated by anthropogenic or natural causes, including the effects of dam construction, overfishing, changes in fish composition, habitat modifications Ethnotaxonomy (Folk monomials) popular classification of fish according to cultural criteria Food preferences and Taboos human diet, taboos and eating habits by fish Fishing techniques and equipment fishing gear, techniques and methods Use of icthyofaunistic resources medicinal, food, commercial, handicrafts, religious and spiritual pur- poses Morphological aspects ethnoknowledge related to fish morphology, anatomy and physiology

Figure 4. Number of published articles on ethnoichthyological subject in Brazil from January 1990 to February 2020 per type of aquatic environment; a) Marine and b) Freshwater environments. and scientists (1.0%), also had a small participation ichthyofaunistic resources, represented approximately in the studies (Figure5). 9.3% of the all studies. While, studies that evaluated the morphological aspects of fish species represented The ethnoichthyological studies addressed seven only 2.7% of the articles (Figure6). different thematic areas (Figure6). Most of them were related to the study of the bio-ecological aspects of fish (33.8%) (Figure6). In addition, studies related to fishing techniques and equipment and the uses of

6 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

Figure 5: Main categories of research actors identiﬁed in ethnoichthyological studies in Brazil from January 1990 to February 2020.

Figure 6. Main thematic areas addressed in the ethnoichthyological studies in Brazil from January 1990 to February 2020.

DISCUSSION obtaining short-term information and have a low ex- ecution cost compared with other studies on fishery resources. Our results showed that the number of articles on ethnoichthyology has increased exponentially in re- Other factors have also contributed to the increase cent years in Brazil, especially since 2000. This in- in publications on ethnoichthyology in the country, crease in published ethnoichthyological articles is not such as the importance of fish for human food and surprising, given that in recent decades, ethnoichthy- the absence of excessive restrictions on the capture ology has been prominent in the research involving and commercialization of fish compared with those of human relationships with animals (Albuquerque et al. other animals (Alves and Souto 2011). In addition, 2013; Alves and Souto 2011; Alves et al. 2017; Costa- the increase in researchers with training and special- Neto 2000; Lyra-Neves et al. 2015). Ethnoichthy- ization in ethnobiology and the emergence of specific ological studies are easy to apply, highly efficient for Brazilian journals for the publication of studies in

7 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

the various areas of ethnobiology and ethnoecology et al. 2017). Understanding the ethnoichthyology of (i.e., Ethnobiology and Conservation and Ethnoscien- these regions can generate important information on tia) have made Brazil a reference in this field in Latin the behavioral, reproductive and dietary aspects of America (Alves and Souto 2011; Alves et al. 2017; fish species, as well as the use of fishing resources by Albuquerque et al. 2013). residents of the region, thus contributing to the pro- For studies of ethnoichthyology and other areas vision of data that will assist in the construction of of ethnozoology to continue to increase in number regional fisheries management policies. and be even more concentrated in Brazil, some points Our results revealed that artisanal fishermen were must be addressed: i) An improvement of the meth- the main research actors in ethnoichthyological re- ods, which are mostly descriptive, is needed, and ii) search in Brazil. According to Begossi et al. (2016), elaboration of studies with hypothesis testing and the who assessed the knowledge of fishers off the coast of use of quantitative analysis methods is also needed. Brazil, the choices of fishermen are associated with the According to Lyra-Neves et al. (2015), in a review wealth of information that these characters present of methodological problems in ethnozoology in Brazil, about the fish and the environments in which they most studies presented some type of sample deficiency. occur. Such knowledge provides scientists with im- In addition, these same authors suggest that the use portant data that complement fishery statistics and of tests and quantitative statistical analyses are in- contribute to the construction of fishery resource man- dispensable for the improvement of the articles. iii) agement plans (Ramires et al. 2012). Despite the real An increase in the number of scientists and research contributions that local fishermen’s ecological knowl- groups focused on ethnobiology will the increase the edge has made to ethnoichthyology studies, it is nec- knowledge of less studied regions. essary to have a greater participation of different ac- The accomplishment of some historical events in tors linked to the fishing activity to elaborate of the the country in recent decades has been fundamental studies, such as fish traders and consumers, students for the present scenario of growth that the studies and researchers/teachers. For example, Braga et al. of ethnoichthyology have shown. These accomplish- (2016), demonstrated through the registration of the ments include the first International Congress of Eth- local ecological knowledge of local fish traders and nobiology (1988), in which the International Society consumers in Santarém,Amazon region, Brazil, that of Ethnobiology (ISE) was created, and later the first the changes in the food choices of these actors over Brazilian Symposium on Ethnobiology and Ethnoe- the years, ended up directly influencing the way in cology (1996), at which the Brazilian Society of Eth- which fish stocks are exploited. nobiology and Ethnoecology was created. This en- Our results revealed that understand the bio- tity has provided means for the dissemination of the ecological aspects of fish are the most studied the- studies carried out in the various clusters of ethno- matic in ethnoicthyological papers carried out in sciences, through its own publisher and the organi- Brazil. As a consequence, most of the studies car- zation of international events (Alves and Souto 2011; ried out in the country address consolidated thematic Albuquerque et al. 2013; Haverroth 2018). areas, for example, the use of local ecological knowl- Ethnoichthyological studies have considered differ- edge in obtaining information related to the biolog- ent regions and states of Brazil. However, some re- ical and ecological aspects of species of commercial gions, such as the Northeast and Southeast Regions, importance such as snappers Lutjanidae (Andreoli et have presented more articles than others. Consoli- al. 2014; Begossi et al. 2011; Calóet al. 2009), dated research groups and pioneering scientists are bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix Linnaeus, 1766 (Silvano present in these areas, and ethnobiology, ethnoecol- and Begossi 2005, 2010), sardine Sardinella brasilien- ogy and their clusters (ethnozoology, ethnobotany, sis Steindachner, 1879 (Braga et al. 2018a,b) and and ethnoichthyology, among others) are the main the jaraqui Semaprochilodus spp. (Batista and Lima lines of research (Alves and Souto 2011). In addi- 2010) in the Amazon; or even species that are in a tion, these regions have extensive coastal areas where state of ecological vulnerability, such as the grouper Brazilian fisheries are concentrated. In this sense, Epinephelus spp. (Begossi and Silvano 2008; Zapelini there is the need to obtain information about fish et al. 2017), or of those that are still little studied species from the Brazilian coast and to give credi- as sharks Elasmobranchs (Barbosa-Filho and Costa- bility to the data of local fishing landings (Begossi Neto, 2016; Barbosa-Filho et al. 2014, 2016) and sea- et al. 2016). On the other hand, despite the rich horses Hippocampus spp. (Rosa et al. 2005; Ternes et diversity of fish recorded in the South and Midwest al. 2016). regions of Brazil, our results indicated that few stud- In addition, our results also showed that the per- ies on ethnoichthyology have been conducted in these ception of environmental changes by research actors regions (Agostinho et al. 2001; Cavalli et al. 2018; have been an important thematic area addressed in Delariva et al. 2019; Florentino et al. 2016; Froehlich ethnoicthyological articles in Brazil. As a result, sev-

8 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

eral authors have highlighted the identification of pos- conclude that topics that are rarely addressed, such sible environmental changes through the perception as the use of local ecological knowledge for the mor- of users of fishing resources, whether due to natu- phological identification of species, need further stud- ral or anthropic causes (Azevedo-Santos et al. 2010; ies and may also guide future approaches. We hope Bender et al. 2013; Hallwass et al. 2013; Lima et that the information contained in this study can con- al. 2010; Martins et al. 2018; Porcher et al. 2010; tribute even more to the increase in ethnoichthyology Santos and Alves 2016), even if in other countries in the country, and that it will serve as support for there are reported a disconnection in complex social- researchers, professors, students and stakeholders in ecological systems in the perception on environmen- future projects that involve interactions between men tal changes (see Rassweiler et al. 2019). Also, our and fish. results revealed that ethnotaxonomy of fish, in which it aims to study the forms of popular classification (folk nomenclature) in different cultures, has become ACKNOWLEDGEMENT a tool widely used by Brazilian researchers over the years, covering several regions of the country (Batista This study was financed in part by the Coordina- et al. 2016; Begossi and Garavello 1990; Begossi and tion of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES) - Figueiredo 1995; Begossi et al. 2008; Carvalho et al. Finance Code 001. We thank the Funda¸cãoAraucária 2018; Clauzet et al. 2007; Mourãoand Nordi 2003, for a scholarship granted to first author. We also 2002a, 2002b). thank the National Council for Scientific and Tech- Given this scenario, it is noted, in our results, nological Development (CNPq) for the continuous re- ´ that there are few studies on morphological aspects search productivity grants to EAG (PQ Process Num- of fish in relation to the other thematic areas of eth- ber: 308578/2017-1). noichthyology. Studies on morphological aspects have aided researchers in identifying signs of sexual dimorphism in species in which sex cannot be precisely de- DATA AVAILABILITY termined. For example, this approach have been used The data used to support the findings of this study to Pirarucu Arapaima gigas Schinz, 1822 in the Ama- are available from the corresponding author upon rea- zon (Lopes and Queiroz 2009) and for Hoplias aimara sonable request. Valenciennes, 1847, as noted by Gama (2014) in his study carried out in the state of Amapá,which reported evidence of external sexual characteristics in CONFLICT OF INTEREST this species for the first time based on the personal observations of local fishermen during scientific expe- The authors declare that there is no conflict of ditions in the region. interest.

CONCLUSION CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT Although our word choices to search for publications on ethnoichthyology in Brazil might produce Conceived of the presented idea: A.T.O., D.S.L., ´ bias and limitations to the generalization of the con- E.A.G. Carried out the experiment: D.S.L. Carried ´ clusions, we believe that our number of articles revised out the data analysis: D.S.L., E.A.G. Wrote the first can be a representative sample on current situation of draft of the manuscript: D.S.L., P.L.S. Review and fi- ethnoicthyology in Brazil. As a result, in summary, nal write of the manuscript: D.S.L., A.T.O, P.H.R.A., ´ ´ we concluded that ethnoichthyology currently shows E.A.G. Supervision: A.T.O., E.A.G. a significant increase in Brazil and that this scenario should continue in the coming years, since the coun- REFERENCES try has played a fundamental role in the consolida- tion of ethnobiology in Latin America. Therefore, it Albuquerque UP, Silva JS, Campos JLA, Sousa RS, is necessary that future studies include regions that Silva TC, Alves RRN (2013) The current status are still little studied by this ethnoscience, as they of ethnobiological research in Latin America: have a rich ichthyofaunistic diversity, which may favor gaps and perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology the emergence of new information about local species. and Ethnomedicine. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-72. We emphasize that it is necessary to include other actors, such as fish traders and consumers, students and Alves RRN, Silva JS, Chaves LS, Albuquerque UP researchers, who can provide a different view regard- (2017) Ethnozoology: An Overview and Cur- ing the use of local fishing resources. In addition, we rent Perspectives. In: Alves RRN, Albuquerque

9 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

UP (eds) Ethnozoology: Animals in Our Lives. Aca- Batista VS, Lima LG (2010) In search of demic Press, pp.513-521. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12- traditional bio-ecological knowledge useful 809913-1.00027-2. for fisheries co-management: the case of jaraquis Semaprochilodus spp. (Characi- Alves RRN, Souto WMS (2015) Ethnozoology: A formes, Prochilodontidae) in Central Amazon, brief introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation. Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. doi: 10.15451/ec2015-1-4.1-1-13. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-6-15. Alves RRN, Souto WMS (2011) Ethnozoology Begossi A, Silvano RAM (2008) Ecology and in Brazil: current status and perspectives. ethnoecology of dusky grouper [garoupa, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. doi: Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834)] along 10.1186/1746-4269-7-22. the coast of Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Minte-Vera CV, Wine- Ethnomedicine. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-20. miller KO (2001) Biodiversity in the high Paraná Begossi A, Salivonchyk S, Lopes PFM, Silvano RAM River floodplain. In: Gopal B, Junk WJ, Davis JA (2016) Fishers’ knowledge on the coast of (eds). Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. and conservation. 1 ed. Leiden, Backhuys Publishers, doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0091-1. pp.89-118. Begossi A, Salivonchyk S, Nora V, Lopes PF, Sil- Azevedo-Santos VM, Costa-Neto EM, Lima-Stripari vano RAM (2012) The Paraty artisanal fishery NL (2010) Concep¸cãodos pescadores artesanais (southeastern Brazilian coast): ethnoecology que utilizam o reservatório de Furnas, Es- and management of a social-ecological system tado de Minas Gerais, acerca dos recursos (SES). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. pesqueiros: um estudo etnoictiológico. Revista doi: 10.1186/1746.4269-8-22. Biotemas. doi: 10.5007/2175-7925.2010v23n4p135. Begossi A, Salivonchyk SV, Araujo LG, Andreoli TB, Anderson Jr EN (1967) The ethnoichthyology of Clauzet M, Martinelli CM, Ferreira AG, Oliveira LE, the Hong Kong boat people. PhD thesis, Califor- Silvano R (2011) Ethnobiology of snappers (Lut- nia University, Berkeley, USA. janidae): target species and suggestions for Andreoli T B, Begossi A, Clauzet M (2014) Etnoe- management. Journal of Ethnobiology and Eth- cologia de Lutjanidae (vermelhos) em uma co- nomedicine. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-7-11. munidade de pescadores artesanais (Bertioga- Begossi A, Clauzet M, Figueiredo JL, Garuana L, SP). Unisanta BioScience 3(1): 15-20. Lima RV, Maccord PF, Ramires M, Silva AL, Silvano Barbosa-Filho MLV, Costa-Neto EM (2016) Conhec- RAM (2008) Are biological species and higher- imento ecológicolocal de pescadores artesanais ranking categories real? Fish folk taxonomy on do sul da Bahia, Brasil, sobre as intera¸cões Brazil’s atlantic forest coast and in the Ama- tróficasde tubarões. Biotemas 29(3): 41-52. zon. Current Anthropology. doi: 10.1086/527437. Barbosa-Filho MLV, Tavares DC, Siciliano S, Moura Begossi A, Garavello JC (1990) Notes on the eth- JF, Costa-Neto EM, Motta FS, Koike CDV (2016) noicthyology of fishermen from the Tocantins Interactions between whale sharks, Rhincodon river (Brazil). Acta Amazonica 20:341-351. typus Smith, 1928 (Orectolobiformes, Rhin- Begossi A, Figueiredo JL (1995) Ethnoichthylogy codontidae), and Brazilian fisheries: the need of southern coastal fishermen: cases from for effective conservation measures. Marine Pol- Búziosisland and Sepetiba bay (Brazil). Bul- icy. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.08.007. letin of Marine Science 56(2): 710-717. Barbosa-Filho MLV, Schiavetti A, Alarcon DT, Bender MG, Floeter SR, Hanazaki N (2013) Do tra- Costa-Neto EM (2014) “Shark is the man!”: eth- ditional fishers recognise reef fish species de- noknowledge of Brazil’s South Bahia fishermen clines? Shifting environmental baselines in regarding shark behaviors. Journal of Ethnobiol- Eastern Brazil. Fisheries Management and Ecol- ogy and Ethnomedicine. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10- ogy. doi: 10.1111/fme.12006. 54. Braga HO, Pardal MA, Cruz RCM, Alvarenga TC, Batista LPP, Botero JIS, Paula EO, Silva EV Azeiteiro UM (2018a) Fishers’ knowledge in (2016) Etnotaxonomia e tabus alimentares dos southeast Brazil: the case study of the Brazil- pescadores artesanais nos a¸cudesAraras e Ed- ian sardine. Ocean and Coastal Management. doi: son Queiroz, bacia do Rio Acaraú, Ceará, .2cm Brasil. Entorno Geográfico 12: 34-49. Braga HO, Azeiteiro UM, Oliveira HMF, Pardal MA

10 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

(2018b) Conserving Brazilian sardine: fisher’s wetlands, Brazil. Environmental Biology of Fishes. atitudes and knowledge in the Marine Extrac- doi: 10.1007/s10641-016-0472-2. tive Reserve of Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro Gama CS (2014) Confirmation of sexual dimor- State, Brazil. Fisheries Research. doi: .2cm phism in Hoplias aimara (Valenciennes, 1847) Braga TMP, Silva AA, Rebêlo GH (2016) Pre- (Erythrinidae: Characiformes) proposed by lo- ferênciase tabus alimentares ao consumo de cal expertise in Amapá,Brazil. Brazilian Journal pescado em Santarém,Brasil. Novos Cadernos of Biology. doi: 10.1590/bjb.2014.0076. NAEA 19(3):189-204. Haverroth M (2018) Ensino e Pesquisa em Et- Castillo TI, Brancolini F, Saigo M, Correa JR, noecologia e Etnobiologia na RegiãoNorte do BaigúnCRM (2018) Ethnoichthyology of arti- Brasil. Ethnoscientia. doi: 10.22276/ethnoscien- sanal fisheries from the Lower La Plata River tia.v3i2.183. Basin (Argentina). Journal of Ethnobiology. doi: 10.2992/0278-0771-38.3.406. Hallwass G, Lopes PF, Juras AA, Silvano RAM (2013) Fishers’ knowledge identifies environ- Cavalli D, Frota A, Lira AD, Gubiani E.A, Margarido mental changes and fish abundance trends in VP, Gra¸caWJ (2018) Update on the ichthyofauna impounded tropical rivers. Ecological Applica- of the Piquiri River basin, Paraná,Brazil: a tions 23(2): 392-407. conservation priority área. Biota Neotropica. doi: 10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2017-0350. Jácome-NegreteI (2012) Etnoictiolog´ıaKichwa de los bagres del géneroPseudoplatystoma (Silu- Carvalho MM, Oliveira MR, Lopes PFM, Oliveira riformes: Pimelodidae) en la Amazon´ıaCen- JEL (2018) Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from trop- tral del Ecuador. Revista Amazónica Ciencia y ical Waters of Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Tecnolog´ıa 1(1): 36-50. Ethnomedicine. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0273-0. Lima FP, Latini AO, Júnior PM (2010) How are CalóCFF, Schiavetti A, Cetra M (2009) Local eco- the lakes? Environmental perception by fish- logical and taxonomic knowledge of snapper ermen and alien fish dispersal in brazilian trop- fish (Teleostei: Actinopterygii) held by fisher- ical lakes. Interciencia 35(2): 84-91. men in Ilhéus,Bahia, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthy- ology 7(3): 403-414. Lopes K, Queiroz HL (2009) Avalia¸cãodo conhecimento tradicional dos pescadores da RDSM Clauzet M, Ramires M, Begossi A (2007) Etnoicti- aplicado àidentifica¸cãodo sexo de pirarucus. ologia dos pescadores artesanais da praia de Uakari 5(2): 59-66. Guaibim, Valen¸ca(BA), Brazil. Neotropical Bi- ology and Conservation 2(3): 136-154. Lyra-Neves RM, Santos EM, Medeiros PM, Alves RRN, Albuquerque UP (2015) Ethnozoology in Costa-Neto EM, Dias CV, Melo MN (2002) Brazil: analysis of the methodological risks in O conhecimento ictiológico tradicional dos published studies. Brazilian Journal of Biology. pescadores da cidade de Barra, região do doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.09314. médioSãoFrancisco, Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Acta Scientiarum 24(2): 561-572. Marques JGW (2012) Etnoictiologia: Pescando Pescadores nas Aguas´ da Transdisciplinari- Costa-Neto EM (2000) A Etnozoologia no Brasil: dade. Revista Ouricuri 2(2): 9-36. um panorama bibliográfico. Bioikos 14(2): 31-45. Martins IM, Medeiros RP, Domenico MD, Hanazaki N (2018) What fishers’ local ecological knowl- Delariva RL, Neves MP, Baumgartner G, Baumgart- edge can reveal about the changes in ex- ner D (2019) Fish fauna of the Pelotas River, ploited fish catches. Fisheries Research. doi: Upper Uruguay River, Southern Brazil. Biota 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.10.008. Neotropica. doi:10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2018-0638. MaranhãoTP (1975) Náuticae classifica¸cãoic- Froehlich O, Cavallaro M, Sabino J, Suarez YR, Vilela tiológica em Icara´ı, Ceará: um estudo em MJA (2017) Checklist da ictiofauna do Estado antropologia cognitiva. Disserta¸cãode Mestrado, de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Ilheringia Série Universidade de Bras´ılia,Distrito Federal, Brasil. Zoologia. doi: 10.1590/1678-4766e2017151. Medeiros MC, Barboza RRD, Martel G, MourãoJS Florentino AC, Petrere M, Freitas CEC, Toledo JJ, (2018) Combining local fishers’ and scientific Mateus L, Suarez YR, Penha J (2016) Determinants ecological Knowledge: implications for coman- of changes in fish diversity and composition in agement. Ocean and Coastal Management. doi: floodplain lakes in two basins in the Pantanal 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.014.

11 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

Mourão JS, Nordi N (2003) Etnoictiologia de tion in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Eth- Pescadores artesanais do estuáriodo rio Ma- nomedicine. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-1-12. manguape, Para´ıba,Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Ruiz-VelásquezL, FariñaA, Rojas M, AlióJ (2017) de Pesca 29(1): 9-17. Etnoictiolog´ıa y aspectos pesqueros de gru- MourãoJS, Nordi N (2002a) Compara¸cõesentre pos humanos que habitan comunidades pes- taxonomias folk e cient´ıfica para peixes do queras del Parque Nacional Mochima, Estado Estuáriodo Rio Mamanguape, Para´ıba-Brasil. Sucre, Venezuela. Revista Bio Ciencias. doi: Interciencia 27(12): 664-668. 10.15741/revbio.04.05.03. MourãoJS, Nordi N (2002b) Principais critérios Santos CAB, Alves RRN (2016) Ethnochthyology utilizados por Pescadores artesanais na tax- of the indigenous Truká people, Northeast onomia folk dos peixes do estuáriodo Rio Ma- Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. manguape, Para´ıba-Brasil. Interciencia 27(11): doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0076-5. 607-612. Silvano RAM (2013) Pesca Artesanal e Etnoic- Morrill WT (1967) Ethnoicthyology of the Cha- tiologia. In: Begossi A Ecologia de Pescadores da Cha. Ethnology 6(4):405-416. Mata Atlântica e da Amazônia.2 ed.Rima, SãoCar- los, pp.131-161. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for system- Silvano RAM, Begossi A (2010) What can be atic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA learned from fishers? An integrated survey of statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. doi: fishers’ local ecological knowledge and bluefish 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. (Pomatomus saltatrix) biology on the Brazil- ian coast. Hydrobiologia. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009- Olarinmoye AW, Olarinmoye OM (2013) Aspects of 9979-2. Ethnoichthyological Taxonomy of Fish Species Silvano RAM, Begossi A (2005) Local knowl- on Sale in Fish Markets of Lagos, Nigeria. Open edge on a cosmopolitan fish ethnoecology Science Repository Anthropology. doi: .2cm of Pomatomus saltatrix (Pomatomidae) in Porcher LCF, Poester G, Lopes M, Schonhofen P, Brazil and Australia. Fisheries Research. doi: Silvano RAM (2010) Percep¸cãodos moradores 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.07.007. sobre impactos ambientais e as mudan¸casna pesca em uma lagoa costeira do litoral sul do Silvano RAM, Valbo-Jorgensen J (2008) Beyond Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 36(1): 61-72. fishermen’s tales: contributions of fisher’s local ecological knowledge to fish ecology and Ramires M, Clauzet M, Rotundo MM, Begossi A fisheries management. Environment, Development (2012) A pesca e os pescadores artesanais de and Sustainability. doi: 10.1007/s10668-008-9149-0. Ilha Bela (SP), Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 38(3): 231-246. Ternes MLF, Gerhardinger LC, Schiavetti A (2016) Seahorses in focus: local ecological knowledge Ramires M, Barrella W (2004) Etnoictiologia dos of seahorses-watching operators in a tropical pescadores artesanais da Esta¸cão Ecológica estuary. Journal of Ethnobiology and Etnomedicine. Juréia-Itatins (São Paulo, Brasil). In: doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0125-8. Diegues ACSA EnciclopédiaCai¸caras: O olhar do pesquisador. 1 ed. Hucitec:Nupaub:CEC/USP, Zapelini C, Giglio VJ, Carvalho RC, Bender MG, pp.117-131. Gerhardinger LC (2017) Assessing fishing experts’ knowledge to improve conservation strategies Rassweiler A, Lauer M, Lester SE, Holbrook SJ, for an endangered grouper in the southwestern Schmitt RJ, Moussa RM, Munsterman KS, Leni- atlantic. Journal of Ethnobiology 37(3): 478-493. han HS, Brooks AJ, Wencélius J, Claudet J (2019) Perceptions and responses of Pacific Island fishers to changing coral reefs. Ambio. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01154-5. Received: 14 November 2019 Accepted: 30 September 2020 Rosa IML, Alves RRN, BonifácioKM, MourãoJS, Available: 27 November 2020 OsórioFM, Oliveira TPR, Nottingham MC (2005) Fishers’ knowledge and seahorse conserva-

12 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09

Additional Files

Add File 1. Total number of data recorded in each analysis.

Analysis Total number of data Temporal pattern of number of articles (number of papers) 177 Number of studies by region (number of papers)* 177 Number of studies by Federal Units in Brazil (number of papers)* 177 Freshwater environment (number of papers)* 76 Marine environment (number of papers)* 104 Research actors recorded in the studies (number of papers)* 177 Thematic areas covered in the studies (number of papers)* 177

13 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1155/2013/670352 Journal Doi do Insti- tutoPesca de Journal oflogical Bio- Sciences Confron- teiras Based Comple- mentary andternative Al- Medicine entiarum. Biological Sciences Bio- Science publication 20092014 Boletim Brazilian 20082017 Biodiversidade 2013 Revista Evidence- 20052014 Acta Sci- Unisanta List of articles included in the systematic review. Add File 2. Abordagem etnoecológicae da captura pesca Itacaré,Bahia (Brasil) de espécies não-alvo em Ethnoichthyology of fishermen community from the PraiaPessoa da City, Para´ıba,Brazil Penha, in João Aspectos do etnoconhecimentomunidade da de co- Bomsubs´ıdiopara a Sucesso-MT, educa¸cãoambiental como Amazôniabrasileira serva¸cãona Wild animals used asBrazil food medicine in Primeiro registro da utiliza¸cãomedici- nal de recursos pesqueirosSãoFélix,Estado da nacidade Bahia, Brasil de Etnoecologia dehos) em Lutjanidae uma comunidade de (vermel- pescadoresartesanais (Bertioga-SP) Dâmaso, R. C.C.; S. Schiavetti, A. Silva-Oliveira,C.; E. Alves, R. R. N. Valentini, C.A.; De M. Almeida,D. J. Oliveira, T. P.Rosa, I. R.; L. Costa Neto, E. M. B.;Clauzet, Begossi, M. A.; Order1 Authors Alarcon,2 D. T.; Almeida, D. M.; 3 Title Almeida, E.4 D.; Almeida,5 N. J. Year R. Etnoconhecimento of em Alves, unidade de con- R. R. N.; 6 Andrade,7 J. N.; Andreoli, T.

14 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1590/1981.81222018000200004 10.5007/2175- 7925.2010v23n4p135 7925.2016v29n3p41 10.1007/s10745-016-9873- 2 10.1186/1746-4269-10-54 10.1016/j.marpol. 2016.08.007 do Museu Para- nense Em´ılio Goeldi Biotemas Ecology of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Policy detura Cul- 2018 Boletim 2010 Revista 201710.22276/ethnoscientia.v2i1.63 Ethnoscientia 20162016 Biotemas 10.5007/2175- 2014 Human Journal 2016 Marine 2014 Fragmentos Conhecimento ecológicotradicional da ictiofauna pelosGuaporé, quilombolas Mato nomeridional, Alto Brasil Grosso, Amazônia dosConcep¸cão pescadores artesanais que utilizam oEstado reservatóriode Furnas, de Minas Gerais,cursos acercados pesqueiros: re- tiológico um estudoLocal etnoic- ecological knowledge andtion percep- of environmental impacts bywers dwell- of the rural zonefish about of stream and the upperGoiás,Brazil Tocantins river basin, Conhecimentopescadores ecológico artesanais do local sulBrasil, da sobre Bahia, as de tubarões intera¸cõestróficasde Knowledge and practices of expertermen fishof south Bahia, Brazil,the regarding international shark fin”Shark market is the man!”: ethnoknowledgeBrazil’s of south Bahia fishermening shark regard- behaviors Interactions betweenRhincodon typus whale Smith,tolobiformes, sharks, 1928 (Orec- Rhincodontidae),Brazilian fisheries: The and tive need conservation measures for effec- Aspectos culturais da zooterapia ealimentar dieta de pescadoreslitoral artesanais paraense do Silva, C. J.; Sander, N. L.;T. Pulido, M. M.; Costa-Neto, E. M.; Lima-Stripari, N. Souza, M. F.;dei, On- L. S.;F. B. Teresa, L. V.; Costa-Neto, E. M. L. V.; Costa-Neto, E. M.; Siciliano, S. L. V.;A.; Alarcon, Schiavetti, D.Costa-Neto, T.; E. M. L. V.;D. C.;S.; Tavares, Moura, Siciliano, Costa-Neto, J. F.; M.; Motta, E. Koike, F. C. D. S.; V. Barboza, M. S.Pezzuti, L.; J. C. B. 8 Arruda, J. C.; 9 Azevedo-Santos, V. 10 Barbosa, H. O.; 11 Barbosa-Filho, M. 12 Barbosa-Filho,13 M. Barbosa-Filho, M. 14 Barbosa-Filho, M. 15 Barboza, R. S. L.;

15 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1186/1746-4269-6-15 10.1086/527437 Re- vista de Antropolo- gia Entorno Ge- ográfico of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Amazon- ica Anthro- pology of Marine Science 2011 Sitientibus 2012 Amazônica- 20162010 Revista Journal 20052008 Acta Current 19921995 Amazoniana Bulletin Etnoictiologia dossanais pescadores da aspectosTapera¸cu,Pará: relacionados arte- Resexcom etologia, Marinha peixesgra¸cãode da usos fam´ıliaSciaenidae de Caeté- hábitat e mi- trativista Riozinho do do Anfr´ısio-Terra Meio, Amazônia,Brasil Etnotaxonomia edos tabus pescadores artesanaisAraras alimentares e nos Edson a¸cudes Acaraú,Ceará,Brasil Queiroz, bacia doIn rio search ofknowledge traditional bio-ecological usefulmanagement: forSemaprochilodus the spp. fisheries case (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae) co- in of centralBrazil jaraquis Amazon, Conhecimento dosmunidade moradores da deJanauacá-Amazonas,sobre co- Boas os hábitos Novas,alimentares dos peixes no daAre região lago biologicalranking categories species real?onomy Fish on and folk Brazil’s tax- atlanticand higher- forest in coast the Amazon Food taboos andfishermen folk medicine from among (Brazil) the TocantinsEthnoichthyology River of southernfishermen: coastal casesand Sepetiba from bay (Brazil) Búzios Island Pezzuti, J, C. B. Botero, J.Paula, E. I. O.; Silva, E. V. S.; Lima, L. G. Castro, C. P.; Vale, J. D. Clauzet,Figueiredo, J.Garuana, L.; L.; Lima, M.; R. V.;P. Maccord, F.;M.; Silva,Silvano, Ramires, R. A. A. M. L.; F. M. S. Figueiredo,L. J. 16 Barboza, R. S. L.; 17 Barros, F. B.18 Etnoecologia da pesca na Batista, Reserva Ex- L. P.19 P.; Batista, V. S.; 20 Batistella, A. M.; 21 Begossi, A., 22 Begossi, A.;23 Braga, Begossi, A.;

16 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1186/1746-4269-7-11 10.1590/S1519- 69842012000500030 10.1186/s13002-016-0091- 1 10.1186/1746-4269-8-22 10.1186/1746-4269-4-20 Amazon- ica Applica- tions of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Jour- nalBiology of of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine 19902004 Acta 2011 Ecological Journal 2012 Brazilian 2016 Journal 2012 Journal 2008 Journal Notes on the ethnoicthyologymen of from fisher- the Tocantins river (Brazil) Food chain and the reasonstaboos for fish among food amazonianforest and fishers atlantic (Brazil) Ethnobiology of snappers (Lutjanidae): target species and suggestionsagement for man- Fishers (Paraty, RJ) andlation time: fish a manipu- variable associatedchoice to for the consumption and sale Fishers’ knowledgeBrazil on the coast of The paraty artisanal fishery (southeastern Brazilian coast):management ethnoecology of and atem social-ecological (SES) sys- Ecology andgrouper ethnoecology ofmarginatus dusky (garoupa,the (Lowe, coast of Brazil 1834)) Epinephelus along avello, J. C. Hanazaki,Ramos, R. M. N.; Salivonchyk,V.; S. G.; Araujo, Andreoli,B.; L. T. Clauzet,Martinelli, C. M.; Ferreira, M.; A. G.Oliveira, L.; L. E.Silvano, R. C.; A. M. Salivonchyk,V.; Hanazaki, S. Martins, N.; Bueloni, I. F. M.; Salivonchyk,V.; Lopes, S. M.; Silvano, P. R.M. F. A. Salivonchyk, S. V.; Nora, V.; Lopes, P. F.; Silvano,M. R. A. vano, R. A. M. 24 Begossi,25 A.; Gar- Begossi,26 Begossi, A.; A.; 27 Begossi,28 A.; Begossi,29 A.; Begossi,30 A.; Begossi, A.; Sil-

17 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1111/fme.12006 10.20950/1678- 2305.2017v43n3p358 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.03.019 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.021 10.5380/dma.v40i0.44776 Deselop- ment and Sustain- ability Manage- ment and Ecology Academia Brasileira de Ciências do Insti- tutoPesca de Research and Coastal Manage- ment eAmbiente Meio Cadernos NAEA 1999 Environment, 20132012 Fisheries Anais da 20172018 Boletim 2018 Fisheries Ocean 20142017 Interciencia 2016 Desenvolvimento Novos Uses of fishof and an Extractive game Reserve (UpperAcre, by Juruá, Brazil) inhabitants Do traditional fishers recognise reefspecies fish declines? Shiftingtal environmen- baselines in Eastern Brazil Influence of tidesing and techniques windsMamanguape and on River strategies fish- Estuary,state, in NE Para´ıba Brazil the Análiseetnoictiológicada pesca artesanal nas baciasUruguai hidrográficasdos e rio Jacu´ı, RioBrasil Grande doConserving Sul, brazilian sardine:attitudes and knowledge fisher’s inExtractive the Reserve Marine of ArraialRio do de Cabo, Janeiro State,Fishers’ Brazil knowledge in Southeast Brazil: the case study of the Brazilian sardine Conhecimentopescadores do tradicionalpectos baixo rioalimentares relacionados dos Juruá: peixes as- da dos Traditional região Knowledge aos ofmen the of the hábitos Fisher- Lowerstanding JuruáRiver: the Under- Reproductivethe Patterns Region’s of Fish Species Preferências e tabusconsumo alimentares de no Brasil pescado em Santarém, vano, R.Amaral, B. A. D.; Oy- akawa, O. M.; T. Floeter,Hanazaki, N S. R.; Nascimento,M.; D. N.; Ferreira, Rocha, E. Mourão,J. S. P. D.; E. R.;D. Dellazzana, A.; Arocha,M. N. Azeiteiro, U.Oliveira, H. M.; M.Pardal, F.; M. A. Pardal,Cruz, M. R.Alvarenga, A.; C. T.Azeiteiro, M.; U. C.; M. Rebêlo,G. H. Rebêlo,G. H. P.; Silva,Rebêlo,G. H. A. A.; 31 Begossi, A.; Sil- 32 Bender, M.33 G.; Bezerra, D. M. M.; 34 Biassi, B. A.; Behr, 35 Braga, H.36 O.; Braga, H.37 O.; Braga, T. M.38 P.; Braga, T. M.39 P.; Braga, T. M.

18 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v35i3.18418 10.12819/2015.12.2.4 entiarum. Biological Sciences da Gestão Costeira Integrada Brasileira de Lingu´ıstica Antropológica fsa entiarum entiarum 20082013 Uakari 2008 Acta Sci- Revista 20082017 Biotemas Revista 2015 Revista 20112002 Tellus 2002 Acta Sci- Acta Sci- Conhecimento ecológicotradicional dos pescadores daAmapá Floresta NacionalLocal ecological do knowledge is notful a source of use- information concerning impacts caused by non-nativeon Nile fishery tilapia stocks Análise ecológica da pescaem artesanal quatroda comunidades costasubs´ıdiospara a de pesqueiras gestãoterritorial Itacaré, Bahia, Brasil: O manguezaldos na pescadores visão artesanais etnoecológica Santa do Canal Cruz, de Itapissuma,Brasil Pernambuco, Ospescadores conhecimentos Terra Xikrin-Mebêngôkre, Ind´ıgena ecológicos Trincheira dos Brasil Bacajá, Pará, Entre Mex e P‘yn‘yre:comer, peixe peixe bom bom para ind´ıgena Trincheira para Bacajá-PA, viver povo naXikrin terra O conhecimentopescadores etnoecológico yudjá,Paqui¸camba, dos Volta Terra GrandeXingu, PA Ind´ıgena do Rio fragmento da plan´ıciede inunda¸cãodo alto rio Paraná:dos ecológica pescadores percep¸cão do alto riopogênicasexpressas Paraná: na altera¸cõesantro- linguagempescadores dos Silva, L. M. A. F.; Mourão,J. S. avetti, A. Farrapeira, C.R.; M. Silva, K. M. E. R.; Carvalho, J. R. S. S. R.;L. Nunes, J. G.;M.; Rocha, Nakayama, L. R. R.; Carvalho, J. R. S. S. R.; Silva, T. R. M.; Barros, F.Nakayama, L. B.; R.; Fonseca, M.C.; J. Santana, A. R.; Nakayama, L. 40 Brandão,41 F. C.; Brasil, J.; Bastos, 42 Burda, C. L.; Schi- 43 Carneiro, M. A. B.; 44 Carvalho Júnior,J. 45 Carvalho Júnior,J. 46 Carvalho Júnior,J. 47 Carvalho, A. R.48 Conhecimento ecológicotradicional no Carvalho, A. R. Conhecimento ecológico no ”varjão”

19 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1186/s13002-018-0273- 0 10.17551/2358- 1778/geoamazonia.v3n5p117- 140 10.13140/RG.2.1.1115.4960 10.1186/s13002-015-0054- y of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine GeoA- mazônia Ichthyol- ogy Ambien- talA¸cão em Biology and Con- servation of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine 2018 Journal 20152009 Revista 2015 Neotropical 2005 Educa¸cão 2007 MultiCiência 2015 Neotropical Journal Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil ”Depois da barragemdrama tudo da mudou”: pesca o esanais do dos médiorio pescadores Tocantins. arte- Localknowledge ecological of snapperActinopterygii) and fish held (Teleostei: Ilhéus,Bahia, by Brazil fishermen taxonomic Conhecimento in pescadores etnobiológico artesanaisde SãoJoãode do Pirabas,estado de do munic´ıpio nordeste Pará do Pesca artesanal e conhecimento localduas de do popula¸cõescai¸caras(Enseada Mar Virado e Barrade do SãoPaulo, Uma) Brasil no litoral Etnoictiologia dossanais da pescadores praia(BA), Brasil de arte- Guaibim, Valen¸ca Integrated approach to the understanding ofriver: the local degradation perceptions,parameters environmental of and geoprocessing an urban Oliveira,Lopes, M. P. R.; Oliveira, J. F. E. L. M.; ros, F. B. avetti, A.;M. Cetra, tos, W. C. R.;A. Vale, V. P.; Sousa,R. C. S. Ramires,Barrella, W. M.; Ramires,Begossi, A. M.; Neto, M.Aretakis, S.A.; G. A.; M. E.;Oliveira, Santos, T.Mourão,J.S.; H.; Sev- R. eri, W.;A. C. EL-Deir, A. 49 Carvalho, M. M.; 50 Castro, V.51 B.; Bar- F. Caló,C. F.; Schi- 52 Chagas, R. A.; San- 53 Clauzet,54 M.; Clauzet,55 M.; Collier, C. A.;

20 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1590/1981.81222016000200002 Eletrônica do Mestrado emuca¸cão Ed- Ambien- tal do Insti- tutoPesca de Develop- ment detri¸cão Nu- entiarum entiarum of Ethno- biology do Museu Paraense Em´ılio Goeldi 2014 Revista 20132000 Boletim 2000 Sustainable 2000 Interciencia 2002 Revista 2000 Acta Sci- 2000 Acta Sci- 2016 Journal Boletim Saberes etnoecológicosdos pescadores artesanais e alunos dado plan´ıciealagável alto rio Paraná Aspectos dopescado consumo em e Parintins comércio de tional knowledge:brazilian a artisanal fishermen’s case community study in a cursos por faun´ısticos uma comunidade afro-brasileira. Resultados preliminares em comunidades de pescadoresnic´ıpio de do mu- Conde,Brasil Estado daO Bahia, conhecimento ictiológicotradicional dos pescadoresregiãodo SãoFrancisco, da médio Estado cidadeda de Bahia, Brasil Barra, Etnoictiologia dossanais de Siribinha, Conde pescadores munic´ıpiode (Bahia): arte- aspectosetologia relacionados dos com peixes a Faunistic resources usedby as artisanal medicines fishermenbeach, from State of Siribinha Bahia,Pesca Brazil do apaiari,(Agassiz, Astronotus 1831), ocellatus e perfil socioeconômico dos pescadores artesanais de uma região da Amazôniabrasileira P. B.; Obara, A. T.; Suzuki, H. I.; Take- moto, R. M. R. R. S.;L.; Souza, Batalha, J. O.Hoshiba, S.; M. A. Dias, C. V.;M. N. Melo, Marques, J. G. W. Marques, J. G. W. V.;Brandão,R. M. Santos, L.; Amanajás, R. C.; D.; Ribeiro, A. B. N. 56 Costa, P. G.; Riva, 57 Costa, T. V.; Silva, 58 Costa-Neto, E. M.59 Sustainable development and Costa-Neto, tradi- E.60 M. Conhecimento e usos tradicionais de Costa-Neto, re- E. M.61 e Restri¸cões preferências alimentares Costa-Neto, E. M.; 62 Costa-Neto, E. M.; 63 Costa-Neto, E.64 M.; Daaddy, M. D.

21 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.7867/1809- 0354.2017v12n3p641-659 10.5380/dma.v30i0.34196 10.1590/bjb.2014.0076 Pesquisa emuca¸cão Ed- Ecologias Humanas eAmbiente Meio of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Bio- Science GeoInt- era¸cões Jour- nalBiology of 2017 Atos2017 de 2008 Revista Biotemas 2014 Desenvolvimento 2014 Journal 20182018 Unisanta 2014 Revista Brazilian Conhecimentopiracema e tradicional defesocomunidades da da pescaambiental sobre em área da duas deBrasil baixada prote¸cão A dos maranhense, percep¸cão pescadores comouca¸cãoambiental subs´ıdiospara e aa Baixo conserva¸cãodo SãoFrancisco ed- etnoictiologia àanálise Contribui¸cãoda da referente legisla¸cãopesqueira ao de- feso deesse espécies de comercial peixes nobrasileira, oeste de da rio inter- Brazil Amazônia Guaporé,O Rondônia, uso do conhecimentocional ecológicotradi- de pescadores no diagnósticodos recursos pesqueiros grandes empreendimentos planta¸cãode em áreas de im- Local ecological knowledgetisanal of the fishersjara ar- on (Lichtenstein,Epinephelidae) Epinephelus on 1822) Ilhéuscoast - ita- state, (Teleostei: Bahia Brazil O conhecimento ictiológicotradicional pescadorese do preven¸cãoàsaúdedos munic´ıpiode Paranaguá-Paraná por pescadoresPercep¸cãoambiental sobre o reservatórioPassagem (RN) Hoplias aimara(Erythrinidae: (Valenciennes, 1847) posed Characiformes) byBrazil pro- local expertise in Amapá, drade, T. S. O.Neta, M.; R. N.Junior, F. A. R. C.; T. Gomes,T.; Brito, M. M. F. G. V. Araújo, T.Souza, S.Torrente-Vilara, R.; G. T. B.; Lima, M.Santos, A.Souza, L.; A. S.Simão, M. T. R.; O.R.; B.; Carvalho, A. A. R. Reuss-Strenzel, G. M.; Alves,Schiavetti, A. J. A.; paio, C. R.; Freitas, H. R.; Bueno, R. S.; Clauzet, M. Silva, M.Guedes, J. R. A. F.; 65 Dantas, J. G.; An- 66 D’avilla,67 T.; Doria, C. R. C.; 68 Doria, C. R. C.; 69 Ferreira, H. M.; 70 Freitas, F. R.; Sam- 71 Freitas,72 F. W. S.; Gama, C. S. Confirmation of sexual dimorphism in

22 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1590/1982-0224- 20150103 10.1080/03670240390229643 10.1590/1982-0224- 20130156 Ichthyol- ogy Ichthyol- ogy entiarum. Biological Sciences Ichthyol- ogy Applica- tions ofand Food Nutrition Ichthyol- ogy 2009 Neotropical 2006 Neotropical 2006 Acta Sci- 20162013 Neotropical 2003 Ecological 2006 Ecology 1996 Interciencia 2014 Interciencia Neotropical Fishers’ resourceliath grouper mapping Epinephelus itajararanidae) and (Ser- conservation in Brazil go- Local EcologicalGoliath Knowledge Grouper on(Teleostei: Epinephelus the itajara Brazil Serranidae) in Southern Conhecimentopescadores ecológico da local Ba´ıa Babitonga,Catarina, Santa Brasil: de Serranidae e peixes nomarinho altera¸cões da ambiente fam´ılia Fishers’ ecological knowledge ofeye small- hammerhead, Sphyrnatropical tudes, estuary in a Fishers’ knowledge identifiesmental environ- changestrends and in impounded fish tropical rivers abundance Does fish still matter?diet of Changes two inties brazilian the fishing communi- Catfish and mullets:ences and the taboos food ofatlantic forest cai¸caras(southern prefer- coast, Brazil) Uso de recursoscaso na da mata Ponta atlântica:Brasil) o da AlmadaLocal (Ubatuba, ecologicalabout knowledge the of lifeterns cycle fishers in and the temporal migrationliza)in pat- of southern mullet Brazil (Mugil ´ ´ A. A.; A. A.; C.;M.; Hostim-Silva, Medeiros,P.; R. Matarezi,Bertoncini, J.; Freitas,Ferreira, M. B. P. O.; C.; Marenzi, R. C.; Bertoncini, Medeiros, P.Hostim-Silva, M. R.; C.; Marenzi, R. C.; Hostim-Silva, M.; Medeiros, P. R. natowski, H. Lopes, P. F.; Juras, A. A.; Silvano,A. M. R. Begossi, A. Begossi, A. Leitão-Filho,H. F.; Begossi, A. Hanazaki, N. 73 Gerhardinger, L. 74 Gerhardinger, L. 75 Gerhardinger, L. 76 Giglio, V.77 J.; Bor- Hallwass,78 G.; Hanazaki,79 N.; Hanazaki,80 N.; Hanazaki,81 N.; Herbst, D. F.;

23 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.008 10.1016/j.oceanaman.2018.07.018 10.1186/s13002-017-0156- 9 10.1590/1676- 06032014003814 do Insti- tutoPesca de Policy Coastal Manage- ment Amazon- ica of Etno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Neotrop- ica and Soci- ety 20122016 Boletim 2010 Marine 2018 Interciencia 2012 Ocean e 2017 Acta Journal 20142009 Biota 2011 Uakari Conservation Estudo piloto sobre opescado autoconsumo entre pescadores de artesanaisestuárioda Lagoa do dos Patos, RS, Brasil Fishers’ knowledge indicates short-term temporal changes incomposition the of amount catcheswestern and atlantic in theHow are south- the lakes?ception Environmental per- by fishermen andpersal alien in fish brazilian dis- tropicalArtisanal lakes fisheries and artificial reefsthe on southeast coast oftions Brazil: to contribu- research and management Estudos etnoictiológicos sobrerarucu o Arapaima gigasCentral pi- na Amazônia The use ofas a local complementary approach ecological tostand under- knowledge the temporal and spatialof patterns fishery resources distribution The ethnoecological knowledge ofermen form fish- three coastal lagoonsnorthern in of the the State ofBrazil Rio de Janeiro, conhecimentoAvalia¸cãodo tradicional dos pescadores sexo daidentifica¸cãodo de pirarucus RDSM aplicadoForaging behaviour à ofine Brazilian and coastal river- fishers:plained how by much the is optimal ex- foraging theory? lasco, G. Begossi, A.;wass, Hall- G.;R. Silvano, A. M. A. O.; M. Júnior,P. C. A.;A. P. M.; Beneditto, Zalmon, I. R. Batista, V. S. Lins Oliveira,E.; Nóbrega,M. F.; J. Lopes, P. F. M. Bozelli, R. L. H. L. M.; Clauzet,Hanazaki, M.; Ramires, M.;vano, N.; Sil- R.Begossi, A. A. M.; 82 Lima, B. B.;83 Ve- Lima,84 E. G.; Lima, F.85 P.; Latini, Lima, J. S.; Zappes, 86 Lima,87 L. Lima, G.; M. S. P.; 88 Lopes,89 A. F.; Lopes, K.;90 Queiroz, Lopes, P. F.

24 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.5380/dma.v37i0.45595 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.10.008 10.1111/jfb.12667 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.014 Brasileira de Agroe- cologia and Society eAmbiente Meio entia Research Brasileira degenharia En- de Pesca ofBiology Fish Coastal Manage- ment 20152006 Revista 2016 Ecology 2014 Desenvolvimento Gaia Sci- 2018 Plos One 10.1371/journal.pone.0193969 20182014 Fisheries Revista 20152018 Journal Ocean e Valor e categorias de uso dosde apetrechos pesca e das etnoespéciesde peixescomunidade da dede pescadores Saca´ı,Caracara´ı-RR,Brasil artesanais Dietary changes over timecommunity in from a the Cai¸cara BrazilianForest Atlantic Nãohápeixe para pescar nesteefeitos verão: socioambientais durante destru¸cão a grandes con- barragens-oBelo Monte caso ”Todo peixemido”: no o marsobre discurso come o do uso e sujeitoartesanais marinhos de coletivo de é Recife co- iscas (Pernam- buco, pelos Brasil) pescadores Analysis of theservation supply chain status andbranchii: con- of sharks Superorderbased on Selachimorpha) (Elasmo- fisher knowledge What fishers’ localveal knowledge about the can changes in re- catches exploited fish Etnoictiológia dossanais pescadores da Vila Cachoeira, arte- Ilhéus-BA Occurrence andhabitat use by ofbirostris giant an manta estuarine Combining ray local fishers’ Manta ecological and knowledge: scientific implicationscomanagement for Souza, J. M. Begossi, A. Silva, Y. Y. P.;dal, Vi- C. L. A. C. F.eira, S. F.; F.; Campos, Teix- S. S.; Lucena, R.P.; F. Alves, R. R. N. B.;M.; Feitosa, Lessa,Almeida, R. L. P.; Heupel, Z. M.;W. Silva, S.; M.;L.; Nunes, Tchaicka, J. L. S. Medeiros, R.Domenico, M. P.; Hanazaki, D.; N. Ramos,Mirotti, P. F. I.;vizan, Tre- L.; S.Wibelinger, L. M. D. P.; Luiz, O. J.; Domit, C. Barboza,D.; R.Mourão,J. S. R. Martel, G.; 91 Lopes, P.92 L. J.; MacCord,93 P. L.; Magalhães, S. B.; 94 Mariz, D.; Souza, 95 Martins, A. P. 96 Martins, I.97 M.; Massena, F. S.; 98 Medeiros,99 A. M.; Medeiros, M. C.;

25 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.21707/gs.v10.n04a09 Neotrop- ica do Insti- tutoPesca de entia Extensão 20062007 Geografares 2008 Biota 2003 Biotemas 2002 Boletim 2006 Interciencia 2002 Interciencia 2016 Interciencia Gaia Sci- 2011 Agroecossistemas 2017 Expressa O espa¸co e de dinâmicasazonalcep¸cão pescadores na tradicionais per- APA da Marimbús- Iraquara,Diamantina - Chapada BA Conhecimento decionais pescadores sobretemporal tradi- de recursos a naturaispada Diamantina, na Bahia Cha- dinâmica”Peixes espa¸co- sabido, que enxergaconhecimento de ictiológicotradicional na longe”: Chapada Diamantina, Bahia Etnoictiologia de pescadores artesanais do estuárioPara´ıba,Brasil do rio asCompara¸cõesentre Mamanguape, taxonomias folk e cient´ıficapara peixesrio do Mamanguape, estuáriodo Para´ıba-Brasil Pescadores, peixes,uma espa¸co abordagem e etnoecológica tempo: Principais critériospescadores utilizados artesanaisfolk na por dosMamanguape, taxonomia peixes Para´ıba-Brasil doPescadores e ”currais”: estuário do umnoecológico enfoque rio et- Queda dano produtividade rio depescadores Tocantins: pescado de Marabá-Pará a dos percep¸cão A ambiental educa¸cão ena a universidade:bre extensão um a garoupa breve verdadeiramarginatus) olhar (Epinephelus e os so- peixes costeirostremo no sul ex- do Brasil Marques, J. G. W. Marques, J. G. W. Marques, J. G. W.; Nogueira, E. M. S. Nordi, N. Nordi, N. Nordi, N. Nordi, N. C.; Córdula, E. B. L.; Lucena,P.; R. F. Rosa,Mourão,J. S. R. S.; F.; Mello,Oliveira, A. H.; Pereira, G. V. D.Mendes, F.; A. N.; S. dini, M. V.; Garcia, A. M.; Botelho,G. J. 100 Moura, F. B.101 P.; Moura, F. B.102 P.; Moura, F.103 B. P.; Mourão, J.104 S.; Mourão,105 J. S.; 106 Mourão, J. Mourão, S.; J.107 S.; Nascimento, G. C. 108 Nascimento, S. 109 Neves, K. R.; Con-

26 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.18561/2179- 5746/biotaamazonia.v5n3p108- 111 10.1086/667717 10.1590/1981.81222016000300004 Bio- Science do Insti- tutoPesca de Amazônia Brasileira de Zoociências Anthro- pology Ciências daciedade So- do Museu Paraense Em´ılio Goeldi of Ethno- biology 2012 Unisanta 20112015 Boletim Biota 20132012 Revista 2017 Current 2016 Revista Boletim 1996 Journal Aspectos ecológicose etnoecológicosso- bre a alimentartropomus composi¸cão de undecimalis, Cen- (Centropomidae) (robalo) Bloch, emRJ 1792 Paraty, Conhecimentocient´ıfico sobre ecológico osartesanal local no peixes sul do Brasil na e de as popula¸cõesnaturais pesca Rela¸cãoentre arraias de águadoce (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) ebaixo rio pescadores Juruá,Estado doBrasil no Amazonas, Conhecimento ecológicotradicional de pescadores profissionais sobre peixes de Mato da ba´ıaCai¸cara,Pantanal Grosso, Cáceres,Brasil Prototypes and Folksanal fishers taxonomy: and snappers on arti- ian the brazil- coast um territóriodestru¸cãode pesca numa perspectiva etnoecológica Mulher e mercado: conhecimentos participa¸cãoe no- femininos na inser¸cãode vas pescado espéciesde no mercado e na dieta alimentar dossex pescadores MãeGrande da em Curu¸cá(PA) Re- Ethnoichthyology ofmen Galviboa of Sepetiba fisher- bay, Brazil A.; Mesquita,Clauzet, F.; M.;tundo, M. Ro- Hartz,Silvano, R. A. S. M. M.; Lima, E. C.;L. Paes, S.;M.; Santos, Araújo,R. L.; Pantoja-Lima, S. J.; Aride, P. H. R. Silva, C. J. C.;Begossi, Barreto, A. T.; S.;Canete, V.Cardoso, D. R.; M. A. 110 Nora, V.; Begossi, 111 Nunes, D.112 M.; Oliveira, A. T.; 113 Oliveira, G.114 Z.; Oliveira,115 L. E. Oviedo, A. F. P.116 Pescadores de Manoel Urbano Palheta, e a con- M. K. 117 Paz, V. A.; Begossi,

27 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.18561/2179- 5746/biotaamazonia.v6n2p110- 119 10.1007/s10668-016-9758- y 10.1186/s13002-015-0007- 5 Amazônia entiarum eAmbiente Meio of Etno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Develop- ment and Sustain- ability of Ethno- biology of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine do Insti- tutoPesca de 2016 Biota 2004 Acta Sci- 20032013 Desenvolvimento Journal 2017 Environment, 20162015 Journal Journal 2010 Boletim Conhecimento ecológicoMero local Epinephelus sobre stein, itajara 1822)Amazônico (Lichten- no Nordeste Paraense saberes populares, percep¸cãoambiental e senso de comunidade conserva¸cãoem ribeirinha do rio Estado Pira´ı,Joinville, de Santa Catarina The fishing systemon of the north BabitongaBrazil: coast bay an of ethnoecological Santa approach Ethnotaxonomical Catarina, considerationsusage and of ichthyofauna inmunity a in fishing Cearástate, Northeast com- Brazil Animal source foodsfishing consumed communities in two oncoast of the Brazil northeast How do artisanal fishermenna name ethnotaxonomic study fish? in Northeast- ern Brazil Use of ichthyofauna by artisanalmen fisher- at twocoast protected of areas Northeast Brazil along the moradoresPercep¸cãodos sobre os impactos ambientais epesca em as uma mudan¸cas lagoa na sul costeira do Brasil do litoral Fernandes, S. C. P.; Gon¸calves, F. M.; Maia, R.Barboza, R. C. S.Silva, B. N.; L.; B. mer, M. Mourão, J.Alves, R. R. N. S.; Mourão, J.Alves, R. R. N. S.; Mourão, J.Alves, R. R. N. S.; Mourão, J.Alves, R. R. N. S.; Poester, G.; Lopes, M.; Schonhofen, P.; Silvano, R. A. M. 118 Pereira, L. J. G.; 119 Pinheiro, L.120 Da ictiologia Pinheiro, ao L.;121 Cre- etnoconhecimento: Pinto, M. F.; 122 Pinto, M. F.; 123 Pinto,124 M. F.; Pinto, M. F.; 125 Porcher, L. C. F.;

28 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1186/s13002-015-0012- 8 Ichthyol- ogy Ceciliana of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Neotrop- ica do Insti- tutoPesca de Neotrop- ica detudos Es- Amazônicos Neotrop- ica 201710.22276/ethnoscientia.v2i1.84 Ethnoscientia 20132012 Neotropical 2015 Revista Journal 20122012 Biota 2007 Boletim 2012 Biotemas 2007 Biota 2010 Revista Biota Preferências, tabus alimentares emedicinal uso deDesenvolvimento Barra Sustentável peixes do naUma, SãoPaulo Reserva de Fisheries monitoring in Babel:notaxonomy fish eth- in anames hotspot of pescaCaracteriza¸cãoda common artesanal econhecimento o pesqueiro localda Ribeira no e Vale litoralFishers’ sul de knowledge SãoPaulo aboutinteractions in fish the trophic southeasternian Brazil- coast Folk taxonomysanal of fishermenPaulo/Brazil) fishes ofA of pesca Ilhabela eIlhabela arti- os (SP), pescadores Brasil (São artesanais de Etnoecologia cai¸cara: odos conhecimento pescadores artesanaistos sobre ecológicosda aspec- pesca The usePaulo/Brazil): preferences, of food taboos and fish medicinal indications inEtnoconhecimento de IlhabelaAmazôniaCentral: pescadores (São estudo de na munidades trêsco- nosLouren¸co,Manacapuru lagos (AM) GrandeFish e diet from São complex Manacapuru (Amazon): Big aing Lake from approach the start- traditional knowledge Zeineddine, G. C.; Vieira, M. C.;rella, Bar- W.; Ramires, M. Minte-Vera, C. V.; Moura, R. L. rella, W.;A. Esteves, M. Clauzet, M.;rella, Bar- W.; Rotundo, M. M.; Silvano,A. R. M.; Begossi, A. Clauzet,Begossi, A. M.; Clauzet, M.;tundo, Ro- Begossi, A. M. M.; Molina, S.Hanazaki, M. N. G.; tundo,Begossi, A. M. M.; Fraxe, T.Silva, J. S.Witkoski, A. P.; C. C. P.; Freitas, C.Soares, E. M. G. C.; M. 126 Prado, D. P.; 127 Previero,128 M.; Ramires, M.;129 Bar- Ramires, M.; 130 Ramires,131 M.; Ramires,132 M.; Ramires,133 M.; Ramires, M.;134 Ro- Ramos, P. M. S.; 135 Rebelo, S. R. M.;

29 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.3354/esr00711 Species Research da Gestão Costeira Integrada emsino En- Ciências de Simpósio Nacional desino En- Ciência e de Tecnolo- gia Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2016 Endangered 2008 Revista 20142010 Investiga¸cões II 2008 Interciencia 2012 Anais da Traditional fisher perceptions on thegional re- disappearance ofsawfish the Pristis largetooth pristiscoast from of the Brazil central Etnoconhecimentoca¸cadoressubmarinos de Ilhéus,Bahia, ecológicocomo subs´ıdio àpreserva¸cãodo mero dos (Epinephelus1822) itajaraEtnosaberes Lichtenstein, pescadores e sobre professores alto dainunda¸cãodo rio plan´ıciede Paraná peixesConhecimento por etnoictiológico ambiental ecep¸cão de per- regiãoda pescadores do plan´ıciealagável alto da rio Paraná O usoestuáriodo rio Mamanguape, dos estado da Para´ıba,Brasil recursos pesqueiros no Use of fishingthe Mamanguape resources river estuary, by Para´ıba state, women Brazil in ´ Freitas, R.Loiola, H. A.; M.;L.; Leite, Oliveira, Soeiro, H. H.Sampaio, Q.; C. G.; L.Nunes, S.; J. A. C.Leduc, C.; A. O. H. C. M.; M. Assun¸cão, F. A. T.; Suzuki, H. I. hashi,Obara, B.Suzuki, A.Avila, T.; K. H. P. T.; I.; Mourão, J.Souto, W.Barboza, S.; M. R. R. S.; Alves, D.; R. R. N. Santiago, I. M.L.; F. Cortez,Trindade, C. S.; P.Mourão,J. S. M.; 136 Reis-Filho, J. A.; 137 Reuss-Strenzel, G. 138 Riva, P. B.; Obara, 139 Riva, P. B.; Taka- 140 Rocha, M. S. P.; 141 Rocha, M. S. P.;

30 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1186/1746-4269-1-12 7925.2016v29n2p101 10.1186/s13002-015-0076- 5 10.5894/rgci428 of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine Coastal Manage- ment do Museu Paraense Em´ılio Goeldi of Etno- biology and Eth- nomedicine de Gestão Costeira Integrada Amazo- nia 2005 Journal 20142014 Ocean e Boletim 20062016 Sitientibus Biotemas 201610.5007/2175- Journal 20132014 Revista Scientia Fishers’ knowledge andservation in seahorse Brazil con- Integrating fishermenscientific knowledge analysis and tofish assess diversity changes and food in web structure A pescalocal e o dos(Symphysodon conhecimento pescadores ecológico aequifasciatus, degrin 1904: Pelle- acará-disco Desenvolvimento Cichlidae) Piaga¸cu- Sustentável naPurus, Reserva baixo rio de Purus,Os Brasil peixes eestudantes a do pesca. povoadoBahia, Brasil Porto Concep¸cõesde Alegre, Conhecimento dossanais sobre pescadores a dieta composi¸cãoda dos pacus arte- (Characiformes:na Serrasalmidae) Floresta NacionalAraguari, Amapá,Brasil do Amapá,Ethnoichthyology rio ofTrukápeople, Northeast Brazil the indigenous A pesca Maceió(Alagoas, Brasil): artesanalFernãoVelho, na comunidadede tradicional de a marginal Habitat de arraias em riosacidentes e valorado o perigo pelo de bacia acidentado Tocantins na Araguaia Alves, R.Bonifácio, K. R. M.; Mourão, N.; J.Osório, F.Oliveira, S.; T. P.Nottingham, M.; R.; M. C. A. R.; Angelini, R. reira, E.;J. Zuanon, Juca-Chagas,Teixeira, R.; P. M. M.; Boccardo, L. Cunha,Soares, F.M.; M. C.; Souza,Florentino, A. L. C. G. P.; Alves, R. R. N. paio, C. L. S. ert, C. S.;G. C.; Araújo, Bertolin,O.; A. Marques, E. E. 142 Rosa, I. M. L.; 143 Rosa, R.; Carvalho, 144 Rossoni, F.; Fer- 145 Sampaio, F. A. C.; 146 Santos, A. L.; 147 Santos, C. A. B.; 148 Santos, E. C.; Sam- 149 Santos, J. M.; Seib-

31 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.20950/1678- 2305.2018.272 10.1007/s10668-007-9126- z 10.19180/2177- 4560.v11n22017p59-77 do Insti- tutoPesca de Journal of Devel- opment Research Policy of Ethno- biology Develop- ment and Sustain- ability Ouricuri do Insti- tutoPesca de doservatório Ob- Ambi- ental Alberto Ribeiro Lamego 2018 Boletim 2018 International 20082001 Marine 2009 Journal Environment, 20182014 Revista 2017 Boletim Boletim Fishing practices and ethnoichthyological knowledge in the fishingof community Miguel Alves, Piau´ı,Brazil Ethnoicthyology offrom Nossa artesanal Senhora island fishers middle in part the of lower the SãoFrancisco river artisanal fishing areasecological and knowledge: the traditional casethe study artisanal of fisheries ofgoon estuary the (Brazil) Patos La- Ethnozoology offrom fishing Ilha Grande (Atlantic communities forestBrazil) coast, Biodiversity, foodecological consumption nichecase dimension: and of the athe rio riverine study Negro, populations Amazonia, Brazil from Narrativas de pescadores artesanaisbre so- aspesca ocorridas transforma¸cões de peixes na Todos estuarinos os da Santos, Bahia Ba´ıade Conhecimento ecológicolocal (CEL) na pesca artesanal da Estadualvolvimento Sustentável Reserva Ponta de Desen- do Tubarão-RN,Brasil O saberde dos Macaé econserva¸cão (RJ): pescadores manejo subs´ıdios artesanais pesqueiros para dos marinhos recursos a Vieira, I. R.;car, Alen- N. L.;R. R.; Soares, Barros, R. F. M. Santos, C. A. B. Reis, E. G. Begossi, A. Begossi, A. Costa-Neto, E. M. Oliveira,Schiavetti, A. J. E.; cher, L. G.; Mincar- ine, M. M. 150 Santos, K. P. P.; 151 Santos, K. S. S.; 152 Schafer, A.153 G.; Seixas,154 C. S.; Silva, A.155 L.; Silva, A. R.156 G.; Silva, E. F.; Lins 157 Silva, E. R.; Fis-

32 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1007/s10745-014-9698- 9 10.18561/2179- 5746/biotaamazonia.v6n3p55- 62 2 Ecology Amazônia Re- vista de Antropolo- gia Bio- Science Amazo- nia Ouricuri Ichthyol- ogy Research 2014 Human 20162017 Biota Amazônica- 20162014 Unisanta Scientia 20122010 Revista 10.1007/s10750-009-9979- Hydrobiologia 20122005 Neotropical Fisheries Traditional ecological knowledge about dietary and reproductive characteristics of Tupinambis merianaemalabaricus and in Hoplias Brazil semiarid northeastern pesca naCaracteriza¸cãoda comunidade de Surucuá(Resex TapajósArapiuns) Etnoictiologia de pescadores artesanais da comunidade Surucuá(Reservatrativista Ex- Tapajós-Arapiuns) Aspectosnoecológicos socioeconômicos dapraticada e naPeru´ıbe/SP pesca Vila et- Preferências Barra esportiva e alimentares do restri¸cões de moradores Uma, doAmazonas de munic´ıpio Juruá, Aspectos etnoecológicos da dospercep¸cão pesca pescadores na deBahia, Brasil Glória, What canan be integrated learnedcal survey ecological from of knowledge(Pomatomus fishers? saltatrix) and fishers’ biology bluefish brazilian on lo- coast the Fishermen’s localedge on ecological Southeastern Brazilianfishes: coastal knowl- contributions toservation, and research, management con- Local knowledge on a cosmopolitanethnoecology fish of(Pomatomidae) Pomatomus in Brazil saltatrix and Australia A. C.G. A.; J. Moura, R. B.; R.querque, U. Alves, N.; P. Albu- T. M. P. T. M. P. T. R.;R.; Barrella, Molitzas, Ramires, M. W.; P. H.S. R.; M.; Santos, L.; Araújo, R. Pantoja-Lima, J.; Oliveira, A. T. Nogueira,M. S. E. Begossi, A. Begossi, A. Begossi, A. 158 Silva, J. S.; El-Deir, 159 Silva, J. T.;160 Braga, Silva, J. T.; Braga, 161 Silva, L. F.; Souza, 162 Silva, M. A.; Aride, 163 Silva,164 S. Silvano, P.; R. A. M.; 165 Silvano, R. A. M.; 166 Silvano, R. A. M.;

33 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1007/s10641-006-9043- 2 10.1002/aqc.825 10.15451/ec2016-7-5.4-1- 16 Biology of Fishes Conser- vation: Marine and Fresh- water Ecosys- tems and Con- servation do Insti- tutoPesca de Interface do Insti- tutoPesca de Eletrônica de Biolo- gia 20062008 Environmental Aquatic 20162011 Ethnobiology 2015 Sitientibus 2016 Boletim 2001 Revista 2009 Boletim Revista When does thismen’s local fish knowledge of spawn? migrationreproduction and of Brazilian Fisher- coastal fishes Contributions of ethnobiologyconservation to of the streams tropical rivers and Trophic relationships betweenand resources: people fishartisanal consumption fishers neighborhood in in an southern Brazil Percep¸cão morfológica deaquáticos pela animais comunidadede pesqueira Acupe, Santoabordagem Amaro, etnozoológica Bahia: guildasRela¸cãoentre uma de peixes, ambi- entes e petrechos deconhecimento tradicional pesca de pescadores baseadoda no Amazôniacentral Do rio Tocantins a hidrelétricade peixe Angical: osmemóriados pescadores peixes e as pescariasConhecimento na popularnuma comunidade sobre cai¸caradaEcológicade peixes Juréria-Itatins/SP Esta¸cão Conhecimentopescadores etnoictiológicosuperior desportivos dos da bacia do do rio Sorocaba trecho MacCord,L.; P. Lima, F. Begossi, A. R. V.; Silva, A. L.; Ceroni, M.; Begossi, A. Martins,Hanazaki, I. N. M.; Pacheco, R. S. itas,Garcez, C. R. C. S. E. C.; Marques,Miranda, E. E.; Araujo, E. A. F. B.; rella, W. Barrella, W. 167 Silvano, R. A. M.; 168 Silvano, R. A. M.; 169 Sousa, M.170 C.; Souto, F. J.171 B.; Souza, L. A.; Fre- 172 Souza, M.173 F.; Souza, M. R.; Bar- 174 Tarcitani, F. C.;

34 Ladislau et al. 2021. Current situation and future perspectives of ethnoichthyology in Brazil Ethnobio Conserv 10:09 10.1186/s13002-016-0125- 8 of Ethno- biology and Eth- nomedicine do Museu Paraense Em´ılio Goeldi of Ethno- biology 2016 Journal 1990 Boletim 2017 Journal Seahorses inknowledge focus: of seahorse-watching operators local in a tropical ecological estuary pesca Assessing ﬁshing experts’ knowledgeimprove to conservation strategiesendangered for grouper an inern the atlantic southwest- Gerhardinger,C.; Schiavetti, L. A. V. J.; Carvalho, R. C.; Bender, M.Gerhardinger, G.; L. C. 175 Ternes, M. L. F.; 176 Velthem, L. H.177 Os Wayana, as ´aguas, os Zapelini, peixes C.; Giglio, e a