DOCSLIB.ORG

Bradley County Road List January 1, 2021 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bradley County Road List January 1, 2021 1 BRADLEY COUNTY ROAD LIST JANUARY 1, 2021 NAME MAP# LENGTH BEGINNING END ROW ROADBED SURFACE TYPE SPEED CLASS SUBDIVISION A STREET 65-L 0.17 TWENTY-SEVENTH STREET TWENTY-NINTH ST 40 18 14 ASP 25 A/2 ABSHIRE LANE 51-D 0.21 WINDERMERE LANE WINDERMERE LANE 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 WINDEREMERE ALBERT LAWSON ROAD 51 0.204 OLD BENTON PIKE DEAD END 40 16 12 ASP 25 B/2 ALBERTA PEACH STREET 59 0.02 GEORGIA BELL CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 PEACHTREE EST ALECIA LANE 82-B 0.36 NYCHOLE DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 OVERLOOK EST ALEXANDER'S CIRCLE 27-H 0.23 IVY WAY IVY WAY 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 ALEXIAN WAY 27-I 0.07 ALEXANDER'S CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 50 (40-P) 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 ALICE STREET 51-108 0.07 CANDICE DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/2 MAGNOLIA LEA SUBD. ALLEY STREET NE 58-H 0.05 LOWERY STREET DEAD END 24 16 12 ASP 25 A/2 ALTON AVENUE SE 65-O 0.11 DOCKERY STREET MARYLAND CIRCLE 36 (50-P) 22 18 ASP 25 B/2 DOCKERY ALVIN COURT NW 33-C 0.13 LEE DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 50 20 16 ASP 25 B/1 LEE ESTATES AMERICAN DRIVE 59-D 0.29 HANCOCK ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 AMERICAN HERITAGE AMHERST WAY 27 0.31 FRONTAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 50 22 18 ASP 25 A/1 AMHERST ESTATES ANATOLE POINT 27 0.17 CITY LIMITS (200'- ANATOLE Ln) CUL-DE-SAC 50 22 18 ASP 25 A/1 ANATOLE ANDERS ROAD 105 0.32 HUGHES LAKE ROAD DEAD END 40 14 10 ASP 25 B/2 ANDERSON CABIN ROAD 2 0.43 SR306 (LOWER RIVER RD) DEAD END 36 16 12 ASP 25 B/2 ANDREW JACKSON LANE 65-K 0.21 DOCKERY STREET CUL-DE-SAC 50 20 16 ASP 25 B/3 WILLOW HILLS ANGIE COURT 20-14.0 0.04 CHRISTIAN DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 NORTH CREEK SUBD. ANN LANE 26-N 0.38 SR60 (GEORGETOWN RD) CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 RIDGEVIEW PARK ANNA BELLE LANE 20-M 0.29 KYLE LANE CUL-DE-SAC 40 (50-P) 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 GOLFVIEW ESTATES ANNETTE LANE 67-G 0.06 MATT CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 50 27 23 ASP 25 A/1 ARCHER LANE 65-M 0.51 FALCON DRIVE FAIRVIEW DRIVE 50 18 14 ASP 25 A/1 TREWHITT ARMSTRONG LANE 87 0.47 ARMSTRONG ROAD DEAD END 40 24 20 ASP 25 B/2 ARMSTRONG ROAD 87 2.81 SR 74 (SPRING PLACE RD) RAMSEY BRIDGE RD 40 21 17 ASP 30 B/2 ARNOLD STREET NE 50-P 0.39 ELEVENTH STREET NE (11TH) DEAD END 36 22 18 ASP 25 A/2 ARP STREET 58-I 0.28 GILLILAND ROAD NEWTON RD 40 20 16 ASP 25 B/3 ARROWHEAD LANE 91 0.34 BLUE SPRINGS ROAD CHANGE ROW WIDTH(11/21/2016) 36 20 16 ASP 25 B/2 ARROWHEAD LANE 91 0.52 CHANGE ROW WIDTH (11/21/2016) DEAD END 25 20 16 GR 25 C/2 ASHLEY COURT 35 0.21 CLINE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 40 20 16 ASP 25 A/1 MORGAN MEADOWS ASHLIN MEADOW LANE 35-H 0.38 TASSO LANE CUL-DE-SAC 50 27 23 ASP 25 A/1 ASHLIN MEADOWS ASHLIN RIDGE DRIVE 34-E 0.16 TASSO LANE CUL-DE-SAC 50 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 ASHLIN RIDGE ASHLIN WOODS DRIVE 35-I 0.23 TASSO LANE CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 ASHLIN MEADOWS 1 BRADLEY COUNTY ROAD LIST JANUARY 1, 2021 NAME MAP# LENGTH BEGINNING END ROW ROADBED SURFACE TYPE SPEED CLASS SUBDIVISION ASHWOOD DRIVE 66-G 0.33 FIELDWOOD DRIVE WATKINS STREET 40 16 12 ASP 25 A/2 WATKINS GROVE ASPEN WAY NW 31 0.28 MOUNTAIN CIRCLE DEAD END 50 22 18 ASP 25 C/1 IMPERIAL GROUP ASTER DRIVE 26-O 0.17 FREEWILL ROAD DEAD END 50 20 16 ASP 25 B/2 HOPE ACRES ASTERWOOD LANE NW 27-P 0.15 FRONTAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A\1 ASTERWOOD ASTERWOOD TRAIL NW 27-P 0.12 FRONTAGE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 ASTERWOOD AUGUSTA LANE 64-G 0.08 BRYMER CREEK ROAD DEAD END 40 20 16 ASP 25 A/1 EASTERLY VARNELL AUGUSTUS WAY NE 35 0.25 OLD CHARLESTON RD NE CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 GRAYWOOD FARMS AUSTIN LANE 105 2.03 KEITH VALLEY ROAD GEORGIA STATE LINE 33 18 14 ASP 35 B/2 AUTUMN DRIVE NE 50-E 0.21 CITY LIMITS CUL-DE-SAC 40 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 PARAGON AUTUMN WIND DRIVE 91 0.86 LEAD MINE VALLEY ROAD AUTUMN WIND DRIVE 50 22 18 ASP 25 A/1 AYERS DRIVE NE 58-F 0.34 CLEVELAND CITY LIMITS CUL-DE-SAC 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 CLOVERLEAF AZALEA AVENUE 26-N 0.18 GEORGETOWN DRIVE LILAC DRIVE 50 22 18 ASP 25 B/1 HOPE ACRES B AVENUE 71-B 0.12 S. LEE HWY S. MCDONALD ROAD 30 20 16 ASP 25 B/2 BAILEY CIRCLE SW 48-F 0.22 BETTIS AVENUE SW JOEL DRIVE SW 50 18 14 ASP 25 B/1 WYATT PARK not BAIN ROAD 60 0.08 CHESTUEE ROAD DEAD END 40 14 10 GR posted C/3 BAKER BRIDGE ROAD 36 2.23 UNION GROVE ROAD POLK COUNTY LINE 40 18 14 ASP 35 A/2 BAKER ROAD 72 0.68 TUNNEL HILL ROAD DEAD END 50 16 12 ASP 25 A/1 BAKER ACRES BALD EAGLE DRIVE NW 32-D 0.63 OLD FREEWILL ROAD BALD EAGLE DRIVE 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 EAGLES NEST BALDWIN STREET SE 66-A 0.21 SR 74 (SPRING PLACE ROAD) CLEVELAND CITY LIMITS 40 22 18 ASP 30 A/2 BALL ROAD 74 0.83 SR 74 (SPRING PLACE ROAD) DEAD END 32/20 (40-P) 14 10 ASP 30 B/4 BALL STREET 66-H 0.08 YOUNG ROAD DEAD END 40 16 12 ASP 25 A/2 BANBERRY DRIVE 47 0.59 BANTHER ROAD BANBERRY DRIVE 50 22 18 ASP 25 A/1 BANBERRY SUBDIVISION BANCROFT ROAD 63 5.20 US11 (SOUTH LEE HWY.) SR312 (HARRISON PIKE) 33 /50/60-P 22 18 ASP 45 B/1 BANTHER ROAD 55 2.11 BANCROFT ROAD BAUGH SPRINGS TRAIL 33 16 12 ASP 35 A/3 BARTLETT CIRCLE NE 35-P 0.53 URBANE ROAD BARTLETT CIRCLE 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 BRADFORD PLACE BASSWOOD PLACE 66-I 0.09 TWIN OAKS DRIVE DEAD END 50 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 TWIN OAKS BATES PIKE SE 58-H 9.60 CLEVELAND CITY LIMITS POLK COUNTY LINE 40 24 20 ASP 35 A/1 BAUGH SPRINGS ROAD 63 0.83 US11 (SOUTH LEE HWY.) CORINTH CH. RD. JCT. 50 22 18 ASP 25 B/1 BAUGH SPRINGS ROAD 63 1.29 BANCROFT ROAD BANCROFT ROAD 50 22 18 ASP/GR 25 B/3 BAUGH SPRINGS ROAD 63 0.87 CORINTH CH. RD. JCT. BANCROFT ROAD 22 14 10 ASP 25 B/3 BAUGH SPRINGS TRAIL 55 1.80 BANCROFT ROAD OWL HOLLOW ROAD 22 14 10 ASP 30 A/3 BEA STREET 58-K 0.12 JANET STREET BATES PIKE 40 20 16 ASP 25 B/2 EASTWOOD #2 2 BRADLEY COUNTY ROAD LIST JANUARY 1, 2021 NAME MAP# LENGTH BEGINNING END ROW ROADBED SURFACE TYPE SPEED CLASS SUBDIVISION BEAN ROAD 47 0.40 OLD HARRISON TRAIL DEAD END 40 15 11 ASP 25 A/2 BEATY DRIVE 26 1.16 OLD FREEWILL ROAD DEAD END 40 20 16 ASP 25 B/2 BEAVERDAM DRIVE 14 0.39 OLD EUREKA ROAD JESSIE LANE 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 EUREKA VALLEY BECK ROAD SE 58-N 0.16 DURKEE ROAD DEAD END 40 20 16 ASP 15 B/2 BEELER RIDGE ROAD 22 1.18 DRY VALLEY ROAD CHATATA VALLEY ROAD 24 16 12 ASP 35 B/3 BELL CHASE WAY 42 0.10 URBANE ROAD BELLINGHAM DRIVE 50 26 22 ASP 25 A\1 BELLINGHAM BELL ROAD 73-G 1.77 SR60 (DALTON PIKE) BLUE SPRINGS ROAD 40 22 18 ASP 35 A/1 BELL STREET SW 73-E 0.42 BELL ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 40 16 12 ASP 25 A/2 BELLEVIEW DRIVE SE 65-M 0.74 FALCON DRIVE MT. VIEW DRIVE 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/2 MOUNTAIN VIEW BELLFOUNTE ROAD 28 0.85 US 11 NORTH (NORTH LEE HWY) OLD CHARLESTON ROAD 40/32 22 18 ASP 25 B/2 BELLINGHAM DRIVE 42 0.16 URBANE ROAD T-TURNAROUND 50 26 22 ASP 25 A\1 BELLINGHAM PHASE II BELLINGHAM DRIVE 42 0.30 URBANE ROAD DEAD-END 50 26 22 ASP 25 A\1 BELLINGHAM PHASE II BENNETT LANE SW 90 0.33 TUNNEL HILL ROAD DEAD END 50 14 10 ASP 25 A/3 BENT OAK TRAIL 73-F 0.17 COUNTRY WOOD DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 40 (50-P) 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 BENT RIDGE COVE 33 0.04 SILVER SPRINGS TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 SILVER SPRINGS BENT TREE DRIVE 40-A 0.92 WHITE OAK ROAD BENT TREE DRIVE 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 BENT TREE ACRES BENTON PIKE NE 58-A 9.09 CLEVELAND CITY LIMITS POLK COUNTY LINE 36 22 18 ASP 35/45 A/2 BENTON PIKE 58-A 0.94 CITY LIMITS (8TH St) CITY LIMITS (BOX 1940) 36 22 18 ASP 35/45 A/2 BENWOOD TRAIL (PT1) 59-G 0.10 OLD PARKSVILLE ROAD BENWOOD TRAIL (PT1) 60 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 BENWOOD BENWOOD TRAIL (PT2) 59-G 0.37 BENWOOD TRAIL (PT1) MACMILLIAN ROAD 50 26 22 ASP 25 A/1 BENWOOD 59C-A- BERRYWOOD CIRCLE 3,18.0,18 0.06 ENGLISH OAKS DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/1 ENGLISH OAKS BETH STEPP LANE SE 67 0.19 BATES PIKE DEAD END 50 18 14 ASP 25 A/1 BETTIS AVENUE 48-F 0.52 MYSINGER ROAD DEAD END 50 18 14 ASP 25 A/1 WYATT PARK not BIG PINE DRIVE 58 0.07 BATES PIKE DEAD END 40 18 14 ASP posted A/2 not BIGHAM STREET 57 0.10 WORTH STREET VETERANS DRIVE 10 14 10 ASP posted B/4 FORT HILL CEMETERY BIGSBY CREEK ROAD 26 3.25 FREEWILL ROAD WHITE OAK VALLEY RD 36 20 16 ASP 35 B/3 BILLINGSLEY STREET 16-I 0.90 US 11 NORTH (NORTH LEE HWY) NEWPORT STREET 40 (50-P) 14 10 ASP 25 B/2 BIMBO TRAIL SE 67-H 0.05 MATT CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC 50 27 23 ASP 25 A/1 BIRDIE COURT 27-D 0.11 GOLF VIEW DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC 50 27 23 ASP 25 A/1 GOLFVIEW ESTATES BLACKBURN HOLLOW 24 0.36 WHITE OAK VALLEY ROAD ASPHALT ENDS (1ST FORK) 24 14 10 ASP 25 B/3 BLACKBURN HOLLOW 24 0.63 ASPHALT ENDS DEAD END 50 15 11 GR 25 C/2 3 BRADLEY COUNTY ROAD LIST JANUARY 1, 2021 NAME MAP# LENGTH BEGINNING END ROW ROADBED SURFACE TYPE SPEED CLASS SUBDIVISION BLACKFOX ROAD 64 1.80 US11 (SOUTH LEE HWY.) OLD CHATTANOOGA PIKE 50 22 18 ASP 35 A/1 BLAIR ROAD 90 0.50 OLD ALABAMA ROAD CANDIES CREEK ROAD 50 20 16 ASP 35 A/1 not BLAIR STREET 57 0.10 PARKS STREET LEA STREET 9 13 9 ASP posted B/4 FORT HILL CEMETERY BLAIR'S BEND 59-G 0.07 BENWOOD TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC 40 24 20 ASP 25 A/2 BENWOOD BLAKE COURT 33-B 0.03 GARDENIA AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC 50 22 18 ASP 25 B/1 HOPE ACRES BLAND DRIVE 35-A 0.33 OAKWOOD CIRCLE OAKWOOD CIRCLE 50 28 24 ASP 25 A/1 OAKWOOD ESTATES BLOSSOM TRAIL 43 0.17 URBANE ROAD CUL-DE-SAC 50 22 18 ASP 25 A/1 DOGWOOD PLACE SUBD.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 Low-Volume Roads Engineering
    Chapter 4 Chapter Chapter 4 Low-Volume Roads Engineering Low-V Low-V Low-V Low-V Low-V olume R olume R olume R olume R olume R “You get what you Inspect, not what you Expect.” LOW VOLUME ROAD is considered a road The basic steps are: oads Engineering oads Engineering oads Engineering oads Engineering oads Engineering that has relatively low use (an Average Planning A Daily Traffic of less than 400 vehicles per day), Location low design speeds (typically less than 80 kph), and Survey corresponding geometry. Most roads in rural areas are Design low-volume roads. A well planned, located, designed, Construction constructed, and maintained low-volume road system Maintenance is essential for community development, flow of goods If any one of these steps is omitted, a road may and services between communities, and resource perform poorly, not meet its expectations, fail management activities. However roads, and particularly prematurely, require unnecessarily high maintenance, or road construction, can create more soil erosion than cause environmental impacts. Without planning and most other activities that occur in rural areas. Proper good location, a road may not adequately serve its users planning and design of the road system will minimize or may be in a problematic area. Survey and design are adverse impacts to water quality. Poorly planned road needed to fit the road to the ground and have it function systems can have high maintenance and repair costs, properly. Good construction insures that the design is contribute to excessive erosion, and fail to meet the needs implemented and built with some degree of quality of the users.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDELINES for TIMING and COORDINATING DIAMOND November 2000 INTERCHANGES with ADJACENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 6
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TX-00/4913-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date GUIDELINES FOR TIMING AND COORDINATING DIAMOND November 2000 INTERCHANGES WITH ADJACENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nadeem A. Chaudhary and Chi-Leung Chu Report 4913-2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 7-4913 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research: Construction Division September 1998 – August 2000 Research and Technology Transfer Section 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. Research Project Title: Operational Strategies for Arterial Congestion at Interchanges 16. Abstract This report contains guidelines for timing diamond interchanges and for coordinating diamond interchanges with closely spaced adjacent signals on the arterial. Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) researchers developed these guidelines during a two-year project funded by the Texas Department of Transportation. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Diamond Interchanges, Capacity Analysis, Traffic No restrictions. This document is available to the Signal Coordination, Traffic Congestion, Signalized public through NTIS: Arterials National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 50 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized GUIDELINES FOR TIMING AND COORDINATING DIAMOND INTERCHANGES WITH ADJACENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS by Nadeem A.
    [Show full text]
  • Daviess County Road and Street Index
    2/22/2021 Daviess County Road and Street Index Route Begin End Length Road Name Number Location Location (miles) Abbie Avenue 1078 KY 2830 Dead End 0.143 Access Road to KY 456 1195 KY 456 Dead End 0.060 Acorn Ridge Court 1334 Beech Hill Drive Dead End 0.141 Affirmed Court 1010D Bold Forbes Way Cul-de-sac 0.047 Alley - 1 (Maceo) 1072L Church Lane 189' W.of High St. 0.094 Alley - 2 (Maceo) 1438 Sacra Drive Dead End 0.039 Alley - 3 (Stanley) 1355C Church Street US 60 0.136 Alley - 4 (Stanley) 1355E Church Street Griffith Station Road 0.103 Alley - 5 (Stanley) 1355D Church Street French Island Road 0.095 Alley - 6 (Brown Court) 1092Z Brown Court Stewart Court 0.137 Alma Court 1112C Waterfield Drive Cul-de-sac 0.159 Alsop Lane 1092A8 US 60 City Limits 0.442 Alvey Bridge Road 1298 KY 279 Hayden Bridge Road 1.454 Alvey Park Drive East 1105 KY 54 Alvey Park Drive W 0.328 Alvey Park Drive West 1106 KY 54 Alvey Park Drive E 0.340 Amethyst Court 1420E Diamond Drive Cul-de-sac 0.053 Antler Avenue 1120E Dead End Foors Lane 0.604 Aristides Drive 1010P Bold Forbes Way Cul-de-sac 0.132 Ashbyburg Road 1247 KY 81 KY 554 1.116 Ashland Avenue 1387B Rand Road (west) Rand Road (east) 0.327 Ashland Avenue Spur 1387B-80 Ashland Avenue End of Maintenance 0.025 At The Post Court 1507k Stirrup Loop Cul-de-sac 0.140 Aubrey Road 1072B Rockport Ferry Road Dead End 0.393 Aubrey Road Connector - 1 1072B-70 Aubry Road KY 2830 (south) 0.019 Aubrey Road Connector - 2 1072B-71 Aubry Road KY 2830 (north) 0.027 Aull Road 1031 Jack Hinton Road KY 144 2.538 Autumn Creek 1213
    [Show full text]
  • Us 17 Corridor Study, Brunswick County Phase Iii (Functional Designs)
    US 17 CORRIDOR STUDY, BRUNSWICK COUNTY PHASE III (FUNCTIONAL DESIGNS) FINAL REPORT R-4732 Prepared For: North Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared By: PBS&J 1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310 Raleigh, NC 27609 October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND..............................................1-1 1.1 US 17 as a Strategic Highway Corridor...........................................................1-1 1.2 Study Objectives..............................................................................................1-2 1.3 Study Process...................................................................................................1-3 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................2-6 2.1 Turning Movement Volumes...........................................................................2-7 2.2 Capacity Analysis............................................................................................2-7 3 NO-BUILD CONDITIONS..............................................................3-19 3.1 Turning Movement Volumes.........................................................................3-19 3.2 Capacity Analysis..........................................................................................3-19 4 DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................4-30 4.1 Intersection Improvements Alternative..........................................................4-31 4.2 Superstreet Alternative...................................................................................4-44
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for HOT Lane Development FHWA
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration A Guide for HOT LANE DEVELOPMENT A Guide for HOT LANE DEVELOPMENT BY WITH IN PARTNERSHIP WITH U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration PRINCIPAL AUTHORS Benjamin G. Perez, AICP PB CONSULT Gian-Claudia Sciara, AICP PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM T. Brent Baker Stephanie MacLachlin PB CONSULT PB CONSULT Kiran Bhatt Carol C. Martsolf KT ANALYTICS PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF James S. Bourgart Hameed Merchant PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF HOUSTON METRO James R. Brown John Muscatell PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Ginger Daniels John O’Laughlin TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Heather Dugan Bruce Podwal COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Charles Fuhs Robert Poole PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF REASON PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE Ira J. Hirschman David Pope PB CONSULT PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF David Kaplan Al Schaufler SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Hal Kassoff Peter Samuel PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF TOLL ROADS NEWSLETTER Kim Kawada William Stockton SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE Tim Kelly Myron Swisher HOUSTON METRO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen Lockwood Sally Wegmann PB CONSULT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Chapter 1 Hot Lane Concept And Rationale........................................................................2 1.1 HOT lanes Defined .................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Subdivision Street Standards Manual
    TOWN OF MARANA Subdivision Street Standards Manual May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER & SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE………………………………………………. 1 1.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………… 1 1.2 Purpose……………………………………………………………………... 1 1.3 Applicability……………………………………………………………….. 2 2.0 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND REGULATIONS…………………….. 2 2.1 Functional Classification………………………………………….………... 2 2.2 Incorporated Regulations Adopted by Reference…………………………... 3 3.0 TRAFFIC STUDIES………………………………………………………………. 3 4.0 STREET LAYOUT AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN………………………………... 4 4.1 Street Layout………………………………………………………………… 4 4.2 Cul-de-sacs………………………………………………………………….. 5 4.3 Design Speed………………………………………………………………... 6 4.4 Design Vehicle…………………………………………………….………… 6 4.5 Horizontal Alignment……………………………………………………….. 7 4.6 Vertical Alignment………………………………………………………….. 7 4.7 Intersection Alignment…………………………………………….………… 8 4.8 Intersection Sight Distance…………………………………………………. 9 4.9 Residential and Commercial Drive Entrances………………………………. 10 4.10 Roadway Superelevation…………………………………………………….. 11 4.11 Roadway Drainage Crossings……………………………………………….. 11 4.12 Mountainous Terrain………………………………………………………… 11 4.13 Environmentally Sensitive Roadways………………………………………. 12 4.14 Alternative Access…………………………………………………………… 12 5.0 RIGHT OF WAY……………………………………………………………………. 13 6.0 ELEMENTS IN THE CROSS SECTION…………………………………………... 14 6.1 Travel Lanes……………………………………………………….………… 14 6.2 Curbing……………………………………………………………………… 14 6.3 Sidewalks………………………………………………………….………… 15 6.4 Shoulders………………………………………………………….………… 16 6.5 Roadside
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Access Management Guidebook
    ReducingTrafficCongestion andImprovingTrafficSafety inMichiganCommunities: THE ACCESSMANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK COMMUNITYA COMMUNITYB Cover graphics and ROW graphic by John Warbach, Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. Photos by Tom Doyle, Michigan Department of Transportation. Speed Differential graphic by Michigan Department of Transportation. Road Hierarchy graphic by Rossman Martin & Associates, Inc. Reducing Traffic Congestion and Improving Traffic Safety in Michigan Communities: THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK October, 2001 Prepared by the Planning & Zoning Center, Inc. 715 N. Cedar Street Lansing, MI 48906-5206 517/886-0555 (tele), www.pzcenter.com Under contract to the Michigan Department of Transportation With the assistance of three Advisory Committees listed on the next page The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Michigan State Transportation Commission or the Michigan Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. Dedication This Guidebook is dedicated to the countless local elected officials, planning and zoning commissioners, zoning administrators, building inspectors, professional planners, and local, county and state road authority personnel who: • work tirelessly every day to make taxpayers investment in Michigan roads stretch as far as it can with the best possible result; and • who try to make land use decisions that build better communities without undermining the integrity of Michigan's road system. D:\word\access\title
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Transportation Mode Choice, Safety & Connections
    Chapter 7: Transportation Mode Choice, Safety & Connections Comprehensive Plan 2040 7-2 TRANSPORTATION City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan 2040 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Transportation Chapter is to guide development, maintenance, and improvement of the community’s transportation network. This Chapter incorporates and addresses the City’s future transportation needs based on the planned future land uses, development areas, housing, parks and trail systems. The City’s transportation network is comprised of several systems including roadways, transit services, trails, railroads and aviation that all work together to move people and goods throughout, and within, the City. This Chapter identifies the existing and proposed transportation system, examines potential deficiencies, and sets investment priorities. The following Chapter plans for an integrated transportation system that addresses each of the following topics in separate sections: • Roadway System 7-1 • Transit Facilities • Bikway & Trail System • Freight & Rail • Aviation The last section of this Chapter provides a summary and implementation section which addresses each of the components of the system, if any additional action within this planning period is expected. The Implementation Plan sets the groundwork for investment and improvements to the transportation network consistent with the goals, analyses, and conclusions of this Plan. As discussed in preceding Chapters of this Comprehensive Plan, the Transportation Chapter is intended to be dynamic and responsive to the City’s planned land uses and development patterns. As the City’s conditions change and improvements occur, this Chapter should be reviewed for consistency with the Plan to ensure that the transportation systems support the City’s ultimate vision for the community through this planning period.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Congestion Pricing Experiences a Report to the Federal Highway Administration
    Review of Congestion Pricing Experiences A Report to the Federal Highway Administration July 2010 Vinayak V. Dixit, Rami C. Harb, Glenn W. Harrison, Donald M. Marco, M. Seph Mard, A. Essam Radwan, Elisabet E. H. Rutstrom, and Mark P. Schneider* Georgia State University (Harrison, Mard, Rutstrom, Schneider) Louisiana State University (Dixit) University of Central Florida (Harb, Radwan, Marco) * Authors are listed alphabetically. The report is prepared as part of the project “Experiments on Driving under Uncertain Congestion Conditions and the Effects on Traffic Networks from Congestion Pricing Initiatives” which is funded under the “Exploratory Advanced Research Program” as Collaborative Agreement DTFH61-09-H-00012 Contact Person: Dr. Essam Radwan, P.E., Professor of Engineering Center for Advanced Transportation Systems Simulation Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering University of Central Florida Orlando, FL 32816-2450 Email: [email protected] 1 Review of Congestion Pricing Experiences Traffic congestion is a major problem in many urban areas. According to the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI, 2009), the average American driver lost 36 hours in 2007 sitting in congestion, wasting an average of 24 gallons of fuel. The average losses per driver in cities where the population exceeded one million were 25% higher. These costs were quantified into a national productivity loss of $87.2 billion, a four-fold increase (in 2007 dollars) from 1982. This figure does not take into account local air quality degradation due to the burning of the wasted fuel; though that externality is partly mitigated by the recent push towards electric and hybrid vehicles and the ongoing increases in fuel efficiency standards (Halsey, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Cobblestone Buildings: Their Nature in General
    Cobblestone Buildings: Their Nature in General As Rich and Sue Freeman say so well in the introduction to their book Cobblestone Quest, Upstate NY residents drive by cobblestone houses and usually give them very little thought. Most people barely recognize that this area was the pre-Civil War birthplace of a new form of construction. It’s a method that remains peculiar to our region with over 90% of the cobblestone buildings in the entire United States being located within a 65-mile radius of Rochester, New York. Estimates vary, but approximately 700 to 1,200 cobblestone buildings were built in the United States. Between 600 and 900 of them are in New York State, spread over 25 counties, spanning from the Hudson River to Niagara Falls.1 Using an Ice Age residue of glacially-rounded native stones, pioneer craftsmen in the middle third of the nineteenth century perfected a form of folk art that was without precedent in America.2 This cobblestone craft that developed in this greater Rochester area flourished, spread and died out within less than half a century. Nevertheless, it left its stamp permanently on this region. According to Rich and Sue Freeman, who wrote the book Cobblestone Quest in 2005, it holds a place in history as the last generation of completely hand-built houses.3 While this article is dealing with cobblestone buildings as a construction method—not an architectural style—it can be said that most cobblestone buildings are Greek Revival in style. Those constructed before 1835 were, however, usually in the Federal style.
    [Show full text]
  • US 278 Independent Review Report
    US 278 Independent Review May 2021 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 Coordination Efforts ................................................................................................................ 1 Oversight Committee .............................................................................................................. 1 SCDOT ................................................................................................................................... 2 Items of Review and Analysis ................................................................................................. 2 Growth Rate/Future Traffic ..................................................................................................... 2 Crash Data/ Safety ................................................................................................................. 3 Reversible Lanes .................................................................................................................... 4 Preliminary Alternatives and Matrix ........................................................................................ 5 Reasonable Alternatives and Matrix ....................................................................................... 5 Additional New Location Alternatives .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED AGENDA PUEBLO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioners’ Chambers, Pueblo County Courthouse 215 West 10Th Street August 19, 2020 5:30 P.M
    REVISED AGENDA PUEBLO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioners’ Chambers, Pueblo County Courthouse 215 West 10th Street August 19, 2020 5:30 P.M. NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19 (Novel Coronavirus): The Board of County Commissioners implemented temporary operational directives on June 16, 2020 to partially reopen public access to county-owned facilities. Beginning on June 22, 2020, there will be limited seats available for the public to attend Planning Commission meetings in person. Anyone interested in attending a meeting in person may do so by submitting a Meeting Request Form on Pueblo County’s web page, subject to availability of seating. The public may provide written comments prior to the meeting by emailing those comments by 5:00 p.m., on Monday, August 17, 2020, to [email protected]. The meeting will be streamed live on the County’s Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/PuebloCounty/. (The Record: The Planning Department staff memorandum and the application submitted by the applicant for each agenda item and any supplemental information distributed by staff at the meeting are automatically incorporated as part of the Record unless specific objections are raised and sustained at the public hearing. Any additional materials used by the applicant or others in support of or in opposition to a particular agenda item may, at the discretion of the person or entity using the materials, be submitted for inclusion in the Record. Such materials for which a request for inclusion in the Record is made shall, at the discretion of the administrative body, be made a part of the Record. Note: Any materials including documents and/or instruments submitted for inclusion in the Record and admitted by the administrative body must be left with the Clerk.) 1.
    [Show full text]