Village of Manchester Hazard Mitigation Plan Village of Manchester, Vermont

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Village of Manchester Hazard Mitigation Plan Village of Manchester, Vermont Village of Manchester Hazard Mitigation Plan , 2017 Village of Manchester, Vermont Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 2 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 3 B. Mitigation Goals ................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Village Profile ........................................................................................................................................ 4 A. Regional Context ............................................................................................................................... 4 B. Demography and Land Use ............................................................................................................... 4 C. Economic and Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................... 4 D. Critical Facilities ................................................................................................................................ 5 III. Planning Process ................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Planning Team ................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Public Involvement............................................................................................................................ 6 C. Hazard Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 6 IV. Hazard Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 8 A. Flooding and Fluvial Erosion ............................................................................................................. 8 B. Winter Storms ................................................................................................................................. 13 C. High Wind Events ............................................................................................................................ 16 D. Hail .................................................................................................................................................. 19 E. Temperature Extremes ................................................................................................................... 20 F. Drought ........................................................................................................................................... 21 G. Wildfire............................................................................................................................................ 22 H. Earthquake ...................................................................................................................................... 24 I. Landslide ......................................................................................................................................... 26 J. Invasive Species .............................................................................................................................. 27 K. Hazardous Material Spill ................................................................................................................. 29 V. Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................................................................... 34 A. Prioritization of Hazards ................................................................................................................. 34 B. Priority Hazards ............................................................................................................................... 34 VI. Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................... 35 A. Hazard Mitigation Goals.................................................................................................................. 35 B. 2005 Hazard Mitigation Plan ........................................................................................................... 36 C. Village Plan of Development ........................................................................................................... 37 D. State and Regional Plans and Programs ......................................................................................... 37 E. Current Programs Supporting Mitigation ....................................................................................... 39 F. Village Capabilities .......................................................................................................................... 39 G. Mitigation Actions ........................................................................................................................... 43 VII. Plan Maintenance ............................................................................................................................... 51 A. Annual Monitoring and Continued Public Involvement ................................................................. 51 B. Plan Evaluation and Update ............................................................................................................ 51 C. Post Disaster Review and Revision ................................................................................................. 52 VIII. References .......................................................................................................................................... 53 A. Literature and Reports .................................................................................................................... 53 B. Map Data Sources ........................................................................................................................... 55 C. Personal Communication Sources .................................................................................................. 56 List of Tables Table 1. Number of properties by classification. .......................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Manchester Critical Facilities. ......................................................................................................... 5 Table 3. Planning Commission members ...................................................................................................... 6 Table 4. Dates of planning meetings and public and agency review ............................................................ 6 Table 5. Total number of flood events by type and year for Bennington County. ....................................... 9 Table 6. Months where rainfall exceeded the 90th percentile .................................................................... 11 Table 7. Structures by type in flood hazard zones in the Village of Manchester, VT. ................................ 13 Table 8. Total number of winter storm events by type and year for Bennington County. ........................ 13 Table 9. Summary of wind events in Bennington County. .......................................................................... 17 Table 10. Sunderland normal temperatures and precipitation for 1981 to 2010. ..................................... 20 Table 11. Years and number of months when the PHDI indicated severe or extreme droughts. .............. 21 Table 12. Wildland fire size classes. ............................................................................................................ 23 Table 13. Earthquakes in Vermont. ............................................................................................................ 24 Table 14. Landslide and debris flow types. ................................................................................................. 27 Table 15. Designated Class B noxious weeds in Vermont. ......................................................................... 28 Table 16. Aquatic invasive species in Vermont. .......................................................................................... 28 Table 19. Vulnerability assessment. ........................................................................................................... 35 Table 21. Comparison of Vermont vs. Village of Manchester Hazard Mitigation Plans ............................. 37 Table 22. Capabilities of the Village of Manchester ................................................................................... 40 Table 23. Ranking of mitigation actions ...................................................................................................... 43 Table 24. Mitigation Actions. .....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 16 Extratropical Cyclones
    CHAPTER 16 SCHULTZ ET AL. 16.1 Chapter 16 Extratropical Cyclones: A Century of Research on Meteorology’s Centerpiece a b c d DAVID M. SCHULTZ, LANCE F. BOSART, BRIAN A. COLLE, HUW C. DAVIES, e b f g CHRISTOPHER DEARDEN, DANIEL KEYSER, OLIVIA MARTIUS, PAUL J. ROEBBER, h i b W. JAMES STEENBURGH, HANS VOLKERT, AND ANDREW C. WINTERS a Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom b Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York c School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York d Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland e Centre of Excellence for Modelling the Atmosphere and Climate, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom f Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland g Atmospheric Science Group, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin h Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah i Deutsches Zentrum fur€ Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut fur€ Physik der Atmosphare,€ Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany ABSTRACT The year 1919 was important in meteorology, not only because it was the year that the American Meteorological Society was founded, but also for two other reasons. One of the foundational papers in extratropical cyclone structure by Jakob Bjerknes was published in 1919, leading to what is now known as the Norwegian cyclone model. Also that year, a series of meetings was held that led to the formation of organizations that promoted the in- ternational collaboration and scientific exchange required for extratropical cyclone research, which by necessity involves spatial scales spanning national borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Run Date: 08/30/21 12Th District Court Page
    RUN DATE: 09/27/21 12TH DISTRICT COURT PAGE: 1 312 S. JACKSON STREET JACKSON MI 49201 OUTSTANDING WARRANTS DATE STATUS -WRNT WARRANT DT NAME CUR CHARGE C/M/F DOB 5/15/2018 ABBAS MIAN/ZAHEE OVER CMV V C 1/01/1961 9/03/2021 ABBEY STEVEN/JOH TEL/HARASS M 7/09/1990 9/11/2020 ABBOTT JESSICA/MA CS USE NAR M 3/03/1983 11/06/2020 ABDULLAH ASANI/HASA DIST. PEAC M 11/04/1998 12/04/2020 ABDULLAH ASANI/HASA HOME INV 2 F 11/04/1998 11/06/2020 ABDULLAH ASANI/HASA DRUG PARAP M 11/04/1998 11/06/2020 ABDULLAH ASANI/HASA TRESPASSIN M 11/04/1998 10/20/2017 ABERNATHY DAMIAN/DEN CITYDOMEST M 1/23/1990 8/23/2021 ABREGO JAIME/SANT SPD 1-5 OV C 8/23/1993 8/23/2021 ABREGO JAIME/SANT IMPR PLATE M 8/23/1993 2/16/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI SUSPEND OP M 9/06/1968 2/16/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI NO PROOF I C 9/06/1968 2/16/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI SUSPEND OP M 9/06/1968 2/16/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI NO PROOF I C 9/06/1968 2/16/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI SUSPEND OP M 9/06/1968 8/04/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI OPERATING M 9/06/1968 2/16/2021 ABSTON CHERICE/KI REGISTRATI C 9/06/1968 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA DRUGPARAPH M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA OPERATING M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA OPERATING M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA USE MARIJ M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA OWPD M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA SUSPEND OP M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA IMPR PLATE M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA SEAT BELT C 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA SUSPEND OP M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON TYLER/RENA SUSPEND OP M 7/16/1988 8/09/2021 ABSTON
    [Show full text]
  • GLOCESTER FC Vanarama National League North Saturday 2Nd January 2021 3.00Pm KO
    OFFICIAL MATCH DAY PROGRAMMEBRAKES £2.50 GLOCESTER FC Vanarama National League North Saturday 2nd January 2021 3.00pm KO MATCH SPONSOR Jake Weaver ISSUE 9 Soccer Club Swap Shop Non-League Programme Competition - First in League & Second Nationally 2019-2020 GAFFER’S COLUMN FROM KICK OFF TO PAUL HOLLERAN ood afternoon Hopefully by the time you Geverybody and a read these notes we will THE FINAL WHISTLE Happy New Year to all of have some idea of the you reading. Let us hope extent of Lance Smith’s that 2021 sees life return injury. We have certainly WE SUPPORT YOUR BUSINESS to something resembling missed him in the last two normality. It would have games and hope that he EVERY STEP OF THE WAY been fantastic to be able will be able to return sooner to welcome fans into the rather than later. ground today but sadly it is Whether you’re starting out, looking to expand or want not to be and we will have Junior English also picked to improve your business performance, HB&O can to soldier on without you up a knock on Boxing Day for a little while longer. and hopefully he will be fit oer a full range services to support you, including: to re-join the squad today. Audit & accounts We picked up from the narrow defeat at Gloucester The game at New Meadow Wealth management with a point from our clash Park was a close run with Hereford here on affair and I thought we Tax planning and advisory Monday. It was not the were worth a point, but Corporate finance most memorable of games Gloucester took one of but the main thing was to the two chances they had Virtual finance oce get back on track and we and were well organised did that.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurse Aide Employment Roster Report Run Date: 9/24/2021
    Nurse Aide Employment Roster Report Run Date: 9/24/2021 EMPLOYER NAME and ADDRESS REGISTRATION EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYEE NAME NUMBER START DATE TERMINATION DATE Gold Crest Retirement Center (Nursing Support) Name of Contact Person: ________________________ Phone #: ________________________ 200 Levi Lane Email address: ________________________ Adams NE 68301 Bailey, Courtney Ann 147577 5/27/2021 Barnard-Dorn, Stacey Danelle 8268 12/28/2016 Beebe, Camryn 144138 7/31/2020 Bloomer, Candace Rae 120283 10/23/2020 Carel, Case 144955 6/3/2020 Cramer, Melanie G 4069 6/4/1991 Cruz, Erika Isidra 131489 12/17/2019 Dorn, Amber 149792 7/4/2021 Ehmen, Michele R 55862 6/26/2002 Geiger, Teresa Nanette 58346 1/27/2020 Gonzalez, Maria M 51192 8/18/2011 Harris, Jeanette A 8199 12/9/1992 Hixson, Deborah Ruth 5152 9/21/2021 Jantzen, Janie M 1944 2/23/1990 Knipe, Michael William 127395 5/27/2021 Krauter, Cortney Jean 119526 1/27/2020 Little, Colette R 1010 5/7/1984 Maguire, Erin Renee 45579 7/5/2012 McCubbin, Annah K 101369 10/17/2013 McCubbin, Annah K 3087 10/17/2013 McDonald, Haleigh Dawnn 142565 9/16/2020 Neemann, Hayley Marie 146244 1/17/2021 Otto, Kailey 144211 8/27/2020 Otto, Kathryn T 1941 11/27/1984 Parrott, Chelsie Lea 147496 9/10/2021 Pressler, Lindsey Marie 138089 9/9/2020 Ray, Jessica 103387 1/26/2021 Rodriquez, Jordan Marie 131492 1/17/2020 Ruyle, Grace Taylor 144046 7/27/2020 Shera, Hannah 144421 8/13/2021 Shirley, Stacy Marie 51890 5/30/2012 Smith, Belinda Sue 44886 5/27/2021 Valles, Ruby 146245 6/9/2021 Waters, Susan Kathy Alice 91274 8/15/2019
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for Reducing Risks from Natural Hazards in North Kingstown, Rhode Island
    Strategy for Reducing Risks From Natural Hazards in North Kingstown, Rhode Island A Multi-Hazard Mitigation Strategy 2019 5-Year Update Strategy for Reducing Risks from Natural Hazards in North Kingstown, RI Table of Contents Executive Summary 6 Plan Format 7 Scope of Plan 7 Goal Statement 8 Section 1. 0 Introduction 9 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Section 2 .0 North Kingstown Profile 11 2.1 Location & Geography 2.2 Demographics & Housing 2.3 General Land Use/ Development Patterns 2.4 Infrastructure 2.5 Open Space Section 3.0 Planning Process 16 3.1 Public Engagement & Outreach 3.2 Developing & Updating Mitigation Strategies Section 4.0 Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment 25 4.1 Hazard Profiles 4.2 Wind Related Hazards 27 4.2.1 Storm Surge 4.2.2 Hurricane 4.2.3 Tornadoes 4.2.4 High Wind & Thunderstorms 4.3 Winter Related Hazards 44 4.3.1 Snow 4.3.2 Ice Storms 4.3.3 Extreme Cold 4.4 Flood Related Hazards 52 4.4.1 Riverine Flooding 4.4.2 Flash Flooding 4.4.3Urban/Stormwater Flooding 4.4.4 Coastal Flooding 4.4.5 Sea Level Rise & Climate Change 4.4.6 Coastal Erosion 4.4.7 Dam Breach 4.5 Geological Related Hazards 76 4.5.1 Earthquake 4.6 Additional Hazards 80 4.6.1 Wildfire 4.6.2 Drought & Extreme Heat 2 4.7 Summary of Hazards 88 4.8 Vulnerability 90 4.8.1 Community Assets (Exposure to Loss) 4.8.2 Critical facilities 4.8.3 Natural Resources 4.8.4 Shelters & Evacuation Routes 4.8.5 Coordination with Neighboring Municipalities 4.9 Risk Analysis 98 Section 5.0 Mitigation Actions 107 5.1 Existing Hazard
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of OBIT FILE (NEWEST VERSION)
    Copy of OBIT FILE (NEWEST VERSION) http://www.jclwyo.org/history/OBIT_FILE_May_28_2019.html Copy of OBIT FILE (NEWEST VERSION) LAST MAIDEN FIRST DATE PUBLISHED Dunnick David 09 Oct. 1890 Cook n/a M.V. 30 Oct. 1890 McClellan James Nov. 30, 1890 Greub infant 01 Jan. 1891 White Thomas April 16, 1891 Davis William (child) 16 April 1891 DeKay n/a Rebecca 30 April 1891 Brock infant 28 May 1891 Holland Burt Mrs. Park (Dr.) 09 July 1891 Holland Cobb Sophronia 09 July 1891 Kirkpatrick James July 16, 1891 Graham Leroy (infant) 06 Aug. 1891 Foote James (infant 27 Aug. 1891 Hasbrouck Erma (child) 10 Sept. 1891 Dunnick Dave 08 Oct. 1890 Simpson Archie Oct. 23, 1890 Cook n/a Mrs. M.V. 30 Oct. 1890 Pomeroy Annie Dec. 4. 1890 Campbell O. Ross 12 Dec. 2002 Mumper Olson Bessie Dec. 12, 2002 Plumlee n/a Mary Helen Dec. 12, 2002 Taylor Lund DoeDec. 12, 2002 Osmondson Dawson Margaret Dec. 12, 2002 Stanley James Dec. 12, 2002 Holmes George "Sonny" 12 Dec. 2002 Gray Montgomery Lorraine "Lori" 19 Dec. 2002 Clarke Stashia Drusilla 19 Dec. 2002 Wilson Jay Dec. 19, 2002 Gibbs John 14 Nov. 2002 Hill Hintz Patricia 14 Nov. 2002 Dybdahl Guy 14 Nov. 2002 Hince Quealy Leslie 14 Nov. 2002 Himes Stair Lillian 05 Dec. 2002 Searchy McAllister Margaret Dec. 5, 2002 Brown Albert "Brownie" 05 Dec. 2002 Hogelund Leonard 21 Nov. 2002 Mikesell Oliver IV Nov. 21, 2002 Huson Richard (infant) 21 Nov. 2002 Ploesser Charles Oct. 31, 2002 Sacke Firekas Fannie Oct. 31, 2002 Leis John Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Flooding Events in Boston
    1810 flooding (4-10 fatalities) - http://www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk/200-years-flood-end-floods/story-11195470-detail/story.html the text below from the website does mention Fishtoft and Fosdyke as areas that were affected: "AS many as 10 people may have died during the great flood of 1810, which engulfed the area in the pitch black of night and without warning. The total loss of life has only now been revealed, following research into archived material. Historian Hilary Healey has researched the incident and uncovered details of the deaths, which reveal the body count to be much more than the four believed to have perished. In Fosdyke, a servant girl of farmer Mr Birkett found herself surrounded by the sea in a pasture while milking cows and was washed away. Also in Fosdyke, an elderly woman in the course of the night was washed out of an upper window of her cottage and drowned. At Fishtoft, Mr Smith Jessop, a farmer's son, was drowned while trying to rescue some of his father's sheep. Accounts of the flood are few, but the Stamford Mercury recorded some inquests which may have been held at Boston court. These included a youth, William Green, about 16 years old, who drowned at Fishtoft, another unidentified boy, thought to have been from a fishing boat called the Amber Blay, and John Jackson and William Black, also from a wrecked vessel. Inquests were also held into the deaths of two women from Fosdyke, Esther Tunnard and Ann Burton, drowned by the flood inundating their cottages (one of them may have been the person referred to above).
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Surge Resilience and the Sendai Framework
    Final Draft of the original manuscript: Gonzalez-Riancho, P.; Gerkensmeier, B.; Ratter, B.M.W.: Storm surge resilience and the Sendai Framework: Risk perception, intention to prepare and enhanced collaboration along the German North Sea coast In: Ocean & Coastal Management (2017) Elsevier DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.006 1 Storm surge resilience and the Sendai Framework: risk perception, intention to 2 prepare and enhanced collaboration along the German North Sea coast 3 Pino González-Riancho, Birgit Gerkensmeier a, Beate M.W. Ratter a 4 a Institute of Coastal Research, Department of Human Dimensions of Coastal Areas, Helmholtz-Zentrum 5 Geesthacht, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany. 6 Abstract 7 This work assesses the capacity of the German North Sea coast community, which has been hit 8 by several disastrous storm surge events in the past, to organise itself before, during, and after 9 storm surge events in order to minimise the impacts. By means of a survey-based method, we 10 explore stakeholders’ perception regarding the risk and emergency management processes, the 11 psychological and social factors conditioning the intention to prepare and collaborate, as well as 12 the feasibility of enhanced coordination and collaboration mechanisms at the community level. 13 Acknowledging past and ongoing successful initiatives in the study area, the method allows 14 identifying opportunities to foster preparedness and adaptation, such as an improved risk 15 communication strategy, mainstreaming and integrating risk reduction within and across 16 sectors, and the transition from basic participatory approaches based solely on information 17 provision towards full involvement and collaborative approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Alex and Heavy Rain 2 to 4 October 2020
    Storm Alex and heavy rain 2 to 4 October 2020 Storm Alex1 marked an emphatic transition to unsettled autumnal weather across the UK. Alex brought stormy conditions with strong winds to the southern half of the UK and the Channel Islands on 2 October 2020, with associated fronts bringing prolonged and widespread heavy rain on 3rd to 4th. Parts of central southern England and eastern Scotland recorded totals of 100mm or more in the first four days of the month, and on 3 October many weather stations recorded their wettest October day on record. The extensive nature of the rain resulted in the UK receiving 31.7mm as an area-average for the rain-day 3 October 2020, making this the UK’s wettest day on record in a daily series back to 1891. Impacts The strong winds and heavy rain brought some impacts and travel disruption, while large waves affected parts of the south coast exposed to the east – for example at Swanage (Dorset). There were temporary power cuts in several areas, including the Isle of Wight, Portsmouth, Southampton, Devon, Cornwall, towns east of Reading and parts of west London. However, although storm Alex and subsequent fronts brought widespread heavy rain, flooding impacts were relatively limited; mitigating factors are likely to have included the dry state of ground prior to storm Alex (most of the UK recording below-average rainfall in September) and the steady nature of the rainfall, with an absence of intense rain-bands embedded in the frontal rain. As it moved south- east into the continent, storm Alex brought extreme flooding to parts of south-east France and north-west Italy, with dozens of houses destroyed, roads washed away, and several fatalities reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 Extratropical Cyclones: a Century of Research On
    CHAPTER 16 SCHULTZ ET AL. 16.1 Chapter 16 Extratropical Cyclones: A Century of Research on Meteorology’s Centerpiece a b c d DAVID M. SCHULTZ, LANCE F. BOSART, BRIAN A. COLLE, HUW C. DAVIES, e b f g CHRISTOPHER DEARDEN, DANIEL KEYSER, OLIVIA MARTIUS, PAUL J. ROEBBER, h i b W. JAMES STEENBURGH, HANS VOLKERT, AND ANDREW C. WINTERS a Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom b Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York c School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York d Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland e Centre of Excellence for Modelling the Atmosphere and Climate, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom f Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland g Atmospheric Science Group, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin h Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah i Deutsches Zentrum fur€ Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut fur€ Physik der Atmosphare,€ Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany ABSTRACT The year 1919 was important in meteorology, not only because it was the year that the American Meteorological Society was founded, but also for two other reasons. One of the foundational papers in extratropical cyclone structure by Jakob Bjerknes was published in 1919, leading to what is now known as the Norwegian cyclone model. Also that year, a series of meetings was held that led to the formation of organizations that promoted the in- ternational collaboration and scientific exchange required for extratropical cyclone research, which by necessity involves spatial scales spanning national borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Handbook 2020
    TH E R S A A N N I V R Y TH Promoting the understanding and application of meterology for the benefit of all E R S A A N N I V R Y Membership HandbookTH 2020 N I V E R S A R A N Y TH I V E R S A R A N N Y rmets.org theweatherclub.org.uk metlink.org Membership Handbook 2020 1 TH E R S A A N N I V R Y TH E R S A A N N I V R Y Contents Highlights TH E R S A N N I V A R Y Page Council and Committees 4 Staff 5 Membership, Grants and Bursaries 6-7 Message from the President and Chief Executive Professional Accreditation, CPD and ACCSYS 8-9 TH The Society will be celebrating its anniversary in 2020. 170 years ago, on Education 10 Wednesday 3rd April 1850, a small group of gentlemen met in the library E R S Public Engagement 11 of astronomer Dr John Lee’s home, atA NHartwellN I V HouseA R inY Aylesbury. They gathered to form a society that aimed to support “the advancement and 170 years of RMetS 12-13 extension of meteorological science”; this society would become the Royal Meteorological Society. Other founding members present that day included Scientific Publishing 14-15 James Glaisher and Samuel Charles Whitbread, the Society’s first President. By the time the group met again a month later, the number of members had Conferences and Meetings 16-17 increased to 90 individuals and included famous meteorologist Luke Howard, Partnerships and Corporate Members 18-19 known for naming clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Identification and Analysis
    HAMPTON ROADS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS 2017 UPDATE The hazards significantly affecting the region, as determined by the planning group during the process outlined in Section 2, were updated with current hazard history information from several sources, including the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Hurricane Tracks, National Weather Service (NWS), and the Commonwealth of Virginia, 2013 Hazard Mitigation Plan. INTRODUCTION This section of the Plan describes the hazards that threaten the Hampton Roads region and provides general background information, local data (e.g., the location and spatial extent), and historical occurences for each hazard. This section also presents best available data regarding notable historical damages within the region. The natural hazards discussed in this section are as follows: FLOODING SEA LEVEL RISE AND LAND SUBSIDENCE TROPICAL/COASTAL STORM SHORELINE EROSION TORNADO WINTER STORM EARTHQUAKE WILDFIRE DROUGHT EXTREME HEAT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT As stated in Section 2, the committee reviewed and discussed manmade (or man-influenced) and technological hazard planning as it was incorporated into the existing plans. The Committee agreed to focus this plan on natural hazards. The exception was Hazardous Materials Incidents, which the Committee determined has enough overlap with natural hazards to warrant consideration as part of the Plan. The committee also discussed Lightning and Tsunamis, two hazards included in previous plans. While the group acknowledged that Lightning is a natural hazard that can affect the Hampton Roads region and that there is a history of occurrence, there is no widespread risk to lives, structures and infrastructure from Lightning and thus the group determined it should be excluded from the plan update.
    [Show full text]