Peacekeepers Under Threat? Fatality Trends in UN Peace Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peacekeepers Under Threat? Fatality Trends in UN Peace Operations SIPRI Policy Brief September 2015 PEACEKEEPERS UNDER SUMMARY w It is often claimed that THREAT? FATALITY TRENDS contemporary United Nations peace operations perform their functions in increasingly IN UN PEACE OPERATIONS dangerous environments and jaïr van der lijn and timo smit are therefore more likely to suff er casualties than in previous years. Yet the data on INTRODUCTION in October 2014 that ‘peacekeepers deaths among UN peacekeepers between 1990 and 2015 in 21st century missions face indicates that fatalities have not Since the United Nations established unprecedented risks . because we its fi rst peacekeeping operation— become more frequent, neither are asking them . to take on more in absolute terms nor, almost 70 years ago—more than responsibilities in more places and 3300 people have died serving the especially, in relative terms. In in more complex confl icts than at fact, the rate of fatalities among UN in the pursuit of peace. On any time in history’.2 In addition, uniformed personnel in UN 29 May 2015, the International the High-Level Independent Panel peace operations has steadily Day of UN Peacekeepers, the Dag on UN Peace Operations stressed decreased in relative terms Hammarskjöld medal was awarded throughout its fi nal report issued since the early 1990s. While the posthumously to the 126 military in June 2015 that peacekeepers are number of hostile deaths personnel, police and civilians operating in increasingly dangerous (i.e. fatalities due to malicious who lost their lives in 2014 while and hostile settings, and that this acts) has increased somewhat in recent years, this is mainly due in the service of the UN. At the will likely increase in the future.3 to the high number of fatalities commemoration ceremony at the Indeed, in recent years UN in MINUSMA, which is one of UN Peacekeeping Memorial in peacekeepers have been attacked New York, UN Secretary-General the most deadly UN by violent extremist groups (e.g. in peacekeeping operations ever. Ban Ki-moon remarked that for the Central African Republic, CAR, the seventh year in a row more All other ongoing UN and Mali), held hostage by jihadists peacekeeping operations have than 100 peacekeepers had died (in Syria), and deployed to areas suff ered relatively few fatalities serving the UN across the world. in which there is little or no peace and hostile deaths, and fewer He attributed this to the fact that to keep (CAR, Darfur, Mali, South than many UN operations that the UN deploys more peacekeepers Sudan). Two-thirds of all UN were active in the 1990s. than ever and that UN peacekeepers peacekeepers operate in countries operate in ever more dangerous where armed confl ict is ongoing 1 environments. and in some cases intensifying.4 These arguments are frequently Meanwhile, since the end of the used. For example, the US 1990s peacekeeping mandates Ambassador to the UN, Samantha have become more robust—often Power, told the UN Security Council 2 United Nations, Security Council, 7275th 1 Ban, K., Secretary-General to the United meeting, S/PV.7275, 9 Oct. 2014. Nations, ‘Secretary-General remarks at 3 United Nations, ‘Report of the High-Level wreath-laying ceremony for International Day Independent Panel on United Nations Peace of United Nations Peacekeepers’, 29 May 2015, Operations’, A/70/95-S/2015/446, 17 June 2015. <http://www.un.org/sg/statements/ 4 United Nations, A/70/95-S/2015/446 index.asp?nid=8687>. (note 3), p. 89. 2 sipri policy brief (hostile deaths).5 The conclusions 250 drawn are that operations have not become signifi cantly more 200 dangerous, at least not in terms of fatalities, and that contemporary operations are generally not 150 suff ering greater losses than their predecessors. Number of fatalities 100 TRENDS IN THE ABSOLUTE NUMBERS OF FATALITIES 50 Figure 1 shows the total number of fatalities per year among all 0 personnel in UN peace operations 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 (peacekeeping operations and Total fatalities Hostile deaths special political missions) since (uniformed + civilian personnel) (uniformed + civilian personnel) 1990. It shows an increase in Total fatalities Hostile deaths fatalities from 1998 to 2005. Since (uniformed personnel) (uniformed personnel) 2006 there has been no clear upward or downward trend, and Figure 1. Fatalities among personnel in United Nations peace operations, except for 2010 (when nearly 1990–2015 100 peacekeepers involved in the Notes: The values for 2015 are projections based on the fatalities in the fi rst half of the MINUSTAH operation died as year (up until 2 July) and do not represent the number of deaths in 2015 so far. a result of the Haiti earthquake) Source: United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO). the fatality levels have remained more or less within a stable range. The same is true when focusing including the authorization to use only on fatalities among uniformed force and sometimes even off ensive personnel (military and police). action. Yet most peacekeepers are By contrast, the number of hostile neither suffi ciently trained, nor deaths has increased more clearly equipped, to deal with asymmetric in recent years. The number of threats and well-armed adversaries personnel killed by malicious acts in addition to the set of tasks they in 2013 and 2014 was at its highest are expected to perform. In other level for 20 years. However, while words—while any death in the this is cause for great concern, service of the UN is inherently recent facility levels are still much tragic—it is hardly surprising that lower than those in 1993 and 1994, peacekeepers are losing their lives when the UN suff ered heavy in the line of duty. losses in the former Yugoslavia However, is it correct to assume (UNPROFOR), Cambodia (UNTAC) that contemporary peace operations and Somalia (UNOSOM II). are more dangerous than before? Moreover, it is worth To answer that question, this policy remembering that malicious acts brief analyses trends in (relative) are not the main cause of deaths fatality rates among personnel in among peace operations personnel. UN peace operations since 1990, with a particular focus on fatalities resulting from malicious acts 5 See box 1 for details about the sources used for this policy brief. peacekeepers under threat? 3 Illness and accidents (i.e. causes personnel have remained stable at that are not directly related about 1 per 1000. to hostile environments) still Looking at the number of account for the majority of deaths, hostile deaths per 1000 uniformed something that remains under- personnel, there is also little reported. Malicious acts usually evidence suggesting that do not account for more than 10 to peace operations have become 30 per cent of all fatalities per year, signifi cantly more dangerous. although the proportion of hostile While there has been a relatively deaths has increased in the past sharp increase in these fi gures few years. since 2010, the peaks in 2013 and 2014 (0.35 per 1000) are not TRENDS IN THE RELATIVE unusually high compared to those NUMBERS OF FATALITIES for the past 25 years, and they are approximately fi ve times lower Notwithstanding the above, when than in 1993 (1.72 per 1000). In comparing fatality levels over fact, when MINUSMA (Mali) is multiple years, it is necessary to excluded from the analysis, 2014 consider the exponential increase actually had the fewest hostile in UN peace operations personnel deaths per 1000 since 1990 as well. Between 1990 and 2015 the (0.08 per 1000). number of uniformed personnel in the fi eld has increased tenfold, from approximately 10 000 to more than 3.5 100 000. Figure 2 shows the number of fatalities per year for every 3.0 1000 military and police (on average) in UN peace operations. The 2.5 reason for focusing on uniformed personnel is that no comparable 2.0 data is available on civilian staff numbers before 2004, whereas the 1.5 monthly statistics on uniformed personnel go back to 1990. 1.0 Surprisingly, the trend in these fi gures seems to contradict the assumption that UN peace 0.5 Number of fatalities per 1000 uniformed personnel operations have become more dangerous. Contrary to 0 expectations, the number of 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 fatalities per 1000 uniformed Total fatalities Hostile deaths personnel has steadily decreased Total fatalities (excluding MINUSMA) Hostile deaths (excluding MINUSMA) over the past 25 years. Whereas most years between 1990 and 2005 Figure 2. Fatalities per 1000 uniformed personnel in United Nations peace recorded values well over 1.5 per operations, 1990–2015 1000—with a peak of 3.3 per 1000 in 1993—the trend line clearly Notes: The values for 2015 are projections based on the fatalities in the fi rst half of the year (up until 2 July) and do not represent the number of deaths in 2015 so far. See falls in 2006 and 2007. Since box 1 for details of the methodology. 2008, fatalities among uniformed MINUSMA = UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali. Source: United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO). 4 sipri policy brief TRENDS IN FATALITIES BY 3.0 PEACEKEEPING OPERATION 2.5 Fatalities are not evenly spread across peace operations, and those with particularly high 2.0 personnel losses can signifi cantly infl uence annual fatality levels. 1.5 For example, the huge spike in fatalities in 1993 resulted primarily from the high number 1.0 of losses suff ered by UNPROFOR, UNTAC and UNOSOM II. An 0.5 obvious explanation for the Number of fatalities per 1000 civilian personnel diff erences in fatalities is that UN peace operations vary in terms 0.0 of operational environments, 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 strength and composition, and mandated tasks.
Recommended publications
  • Multilateral Peace Operations and the Challenges of Organized Crime
    SIPRI Background Paper February 2018 MULTILATERAL PEACE PROJECT SUMMARY w The New Geopolitics of Peace OPERATIONS AND THE Operations III: Non‑traditional Security Challenges initiative CHALLENGES OF was launched with support from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, co‑sponsored ORGANIZED CRIME by Ethiopia, and in continued partnership with the Friedrich‑ jaÏr van der lijn Ebert‑Stiftung (FES). This phase of the initiative seeks to enhance understanding I. Introduction about peace operations and non‑traditional security Multilateral peace operations are increasingly confronting a set of challenges such as terrorism interrelated and mutually reinforcing security challenges that are relatively and violent extremism, new to them, that do not respect borders, and that have causes and effects irregular migration, piracy, which cut right across the international security, peacebuilding and organized crime and environmental degradation. It development agendas.1 Organized crime provides one of the most prominent aims to identify the various examples of these ‘non-traditional’ security challenges.2 perceptions, positions and There are many different definitions of organized crime depending on the interests of the relevant context, sector and organization. The United Nations Convention against stakeholders, as well as to Transnational Organized Crime defines an ‘organized criminal group’ as stimulate open dialogue, ‘a structured group of three or more persons, existing for a period of time cooperation and mutual and acting in concert with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes understanding by engaging key or offences . in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other stakeholders and mapping the material benefit’.3 However, this definition is not unchallenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha)
    OCTOBER 2005 UN OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) TABLE OF CONTENTS NUMBERS................................................................................................................ 1 A............................................................................................................................. 2 B ........................................................................................................................... 13 C........................................................................................................................... 16 D........................................................................................................................... 28 E ........................................................................................................................... 32 F ........................................................................................................................... 36 G .......................................................................................................................... 40 H........................................................................................................................... 43 I ............................................................................................................................ 47 J............................................................................................................................ 54 K ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Index and Abbreviations DIPLOMATIC BLUEBOOK 2005
    Index and Abbreviations DIPLOMATIC BLUEBOOK 2005 Index <Notes> 1. This index is comprised of terms that can be found in the main text (including charts), columns, and topics. 2. The figures indicate the page numbers on which references to the terms appear. Italicized figures denote terms that appear in the charts, columns or topics. Numbers 13, 15, 18, 19, 34, 42, 43, 45, 46, 49, 50, 52, 54, 56, 57, 150th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic rela- 58, 59, 60, 63, 73, 137, 139, 139, 140, 157, 159, 162, tions between the two countries [Japan and Russia]: 167, 168, 169, 170, 177, 184, 187, 201, 218, 253 87, 91 ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF): 5, 18, 56, 138, 140, 142 1993 Tokyo Declaration: 88 B 386 generation: 32 3R: 9, 172, 174, 185, 187 barrier: 104 3rd Africa-Asia Business Forum: 118, 121 Bills Concerning Responses to Armed Attack Situations: 4th plenary session of the 16th Central Committee: 38 218 9/11 Commission: 66 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC): 153, 156, 157 biometrics: 239 A Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE): 63, 65, 70 abduction: 47, 98, 235, 237, 239 Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative: 114, 115, abduction and murder of a Japanese national: 235 116 abduction cases involving Japanese nationals [in Iraq]: 239 Byrd Amendment: 65, 166 abduction issue: 3, 11, 21, 24, 26, 69, 191, 192 C Abu Dhabi Meeting: 13, 100 Action Plan for Prevention of Terrorism: 140 Central Asia Plus Japan: 14, 87, 93 Additional Protocol: 8, 111, 133, 133, 153, 155, 218 Central Asian Cooperation Organization (CACO): 92, 93 Additional
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 14 December 2017
    United Nations A/72/649 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 December 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Agenda item 149 Administrative and budgetary aspects of the financing of the United Nations peacekeeping operations Updated financial position of closed peacekeeping missions as at 30 June 2017 Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report provides information on the financial position of 29 closed peacekeeping missions as at 30 June 2017. Of those missions, five had net cash deficits in the total amount of $86.0 million (in comparison with $86.1 million as at 30 June 2016) as a result of outstanding payments of assessed contributions from Member States. The remaining 24 closed peacekeeping missions had net cash surpluses available for credit to Member States totalling $85.3 million (in comparison with $67.7 million as at 30 June 2016). 17-22541 (E) 281217 *1722541* A/72/649 Abbreviations MINUGUA United Nations Verification Mission in Guatemala MINURCA United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic MINURCAT United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad MINURSO United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara MIPONUH United Nations Civilian Police Mission in Haiti MONUA United Nations Observer Mission in Angola MONUSCO United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo ONUB United Nations Operation in Burundi ONUCA United Nations Observer Group in Central America ONUMOZ United Nations Operation in Mozambique ONUSAL United Nations Observer
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS MEDALS Page
    17 May 2019 CHAPTER 5 UNITED NATIONS MEDALS Page 03 United Nations Service Medal – Korea 05 General Information UN Medals 07 UN Emergency Force (Egypt) UNEF 08 UN Truce Supervision Organization in Palestine UNTSO 09 UN Observer Group in Lebanon UNOGIL 10 UN Good Offices Mission in Afghanistan and Pakistan UNGOMAP 11 Office of the Secretary-General in Afgh. & Pakistan OSGAP 12 UN Military Observation Group in India and Pakistan UNMOGIP 13 Organisations des Nations Unies au Congo ONUC 14 UN Temporary Executive Authority in West New Guinea UNTEA 15 UN Yemen Observation Mission UNYOM 16 UN Force in Cyprus UNFICYP 18 UN India Pakistan Observation Mission UNIPOM 19 UN Emergency Force Middle East UNEFME 20 UN Disengagement Observer Force (Golan Heights) UNDOF 21 UN Interim Force in Lebanon UNIFIL 22 UN Iran / Iraq Military Observer Group UNIIMOG 23 UN Transition Assistance Group in Namibia UNTAG 24 UN Observer Group in Central America ONUCA 25 UN Iraq / Kuwait Observer Mission UNIKOM 26 UN Angola Verification Mission II UNAVEM 27 UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara MINURSO 28 UN Observer Group in El Salvador ONUSAL 29 UN Protection Force (former Yugoslavia) UNPROFOR 32 UN Confidence Restoration Operation in Croatia UNCRO 33 UN Advanced Mission in Cambodia UNAMIC 34 UN Transitional Authority in Cambodia UNTAC 35 UN Operations in Somalia UNOSOM 36 UN Operations in Mozambique ONUMOZ 37 UN Observer Mission Uganda / Rwanda UNOMUR 38 UN Assistance Mission in Rwanda UNAMIR 39 UN Observer Group for the Verification of the Elections in Haiti
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP Report on "Greening the Blue Helmets"
    Greening the Blue Helmets Environment, Natural Resources and UN Peacekeeping Operations United Nations Environment Programme About UNEP’s Disasters and Conflicts Programme The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) seeks to minimize threats to human well-being from the environmental causes and consequences of conflicts and disasters. Through its Disasters and Conflicts programme, it conducts field based environmental assessments and strengthens national environmental and resource management capacity in countries affected by conflicts and disasters. Since 1999, UNEP has operated in more than 35 countries and published over 20 environmental assessment reports. Based on this expertise, UNEP is providing technical assistance to a number of UN and international actors, including the Peacebuilding Support Office (PBSO), the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), the Department of Field Support (DFS), the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the European Commission, in assessing the role of natural resources and the environment in conflict and peacebuilding. The main objective of this technical cooperation is to help member states identify conflict risks and peacebuilding opportunities from natural resources and the environment. The aim is to promote the use of natural resources in ways that create jobs, sustain livelihoods and contribute to economic recovery and reconciliation while avoiding new forms of grievances or major environmental degradation. About this report This report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how peacekeeping operations affect and are affected by natural resources and environmental conditions. The report is divided into two main parts. Part 1 reviews the environmental management of peacekeeping operations and showcases good practices, technologies and behaviours that have already been adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficacy of Peacekeeping 1
    BABCOCK: THE EFFICACY OF PEACEKEEPING 79 The Efficacy of Peacekeeping 1 Sandy Babcock Director General Operational Research Department of National Defence, Canada Canadian Forces Experimentation Centre National Defence Headquarters Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sandy Babcock is pursuing his Ph.D. in history at Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. His doctoral thesis relates to the impact of professionalism on the Royal Canadian Air Force, 1945-1964. He recently retired from the Canadian Forces after a 29-year career and began a second career conducting operational research for the Canadian Department of National Defence. His current employment is with the Canadian Forces Experimentation Centre, where he is the acting team leader responsible for the identification and development of future concepts. ABSTRACT This study seeks to assess the efficacy of United Nations peacekeeping missions. Using qualitative analysis to categorize these missions as successful, partially successful or unsuccessful, the location, timing, duration, size, interstate versus intrastate peacekeeping, and peacekeeper density of missions are then examined against the level of success encountered. The results of this study suggest that some of these factors do provide limited indications of the chances for mission success. INTRODUCTION For more than 50 years, United Nations (UN) peacekeeping missions have been one of the cornerstones of international efforts to restore or support governance and stability. Since
    [Show full text]
  • UN Peacekeeping List of Operations
    LIST OF PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS 1948 - 2017 ACRONYM MISSION NAME START DATE END DATE UNTSO United Nations Truce Supervision Organization May 1948 Present UNMOGIP United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan January 1949 Present UNEF I First United Nations Emergency Force November 1956 June 1967 UNOGIL United Nations Observation Group in Lebanon June 1958 December 1958 ONUC United Nations Operation in the Congo July 1960 June 1964 UNSF United Nations Security Force in West New Guinea October 1962 April 1963 UNYOM United Nations Yemen Observation Mission July 1963 September 1964 UNFICYP United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus March 1964 Present Mission of the Representative of the Secretary-General in the DOMREP May 1965 October 1966 Dominican Republic UNIPOM United Nations India-Pakistan Observation Mission September 1965 March 1966 UNEF II Second United Nations Emergency Force October 1973 July 1979 UNDOF United Nations Disengagement Observer Force June 1974 Present UNIFIL United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon March 1978 Present UNGOMAP United Nations Good Offices Mission in Afghanistan and Pakistan May 1988 March 1990 UNIIMOG United Nations Iran-Iraq Military Observer Group August 1988 February 1991 UNAVEM I United Nations Angola Verification Mission I January 1989 June 1991 UNTAG United Nations Transition Assistance Group April 1989 March 1990 ONUCA United Nations Observer Group in Central America November 1989 January 1992 UNIKOM United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission April 1991 October 2003 MINURSO United
    [Show full text]
  • Guía Académica
    GUÍA ACADÉMICA 1 Security Council 3 ÍNDICE 1. Presentation letters. 2. About the committee. 3. About the Agenda. 3.1. Topic A. 3.2. Topic B. 4. Glossary. 5. Refferences 4 WELCOMING LETTER SECRETARY-GENERAL AND UNDER SECRETARY-GENERAL OF MONUA 2020 Delegates, From the Office of the Secretary-General, it is with great plea- sure that we welcome you to the ninth version of the Modelo de Naciones Unidas de la Universidad de los Andes. My name is Jordi Enrique Buitrago Soetendal. I am a fourth- year Law student with a minor in International Studies at the Universidad de los Andes. For MONUA 2020, I have the honour of accomplishing the biggest dream of my MUN career: serv- ing as Secretary-General of MONUA. I have been participating in MUN conferences for the last eight years, and MONUA 2020 is with no doubt the most complex and exciting challenge I have faced during all these years. Besides MUN, I am passion- ate about my career, particularly for Criminal Law, as well as football and literature. On my behalf, I am Santiago Paz Ramos, a fourth-year Eco- nomics major with minors in International Relations and Law. In this edition, I have the huge honor to continue building dreams by your side, by serving as Undersecretary-General for MONUA 2020. I have been participating in these conferences for the past 7 years now, and each day I learn something new, meet one-of-a-kind people, and surpass the barriers of what I think I am capable of. Personally, aside from being deeply passionate about these conferences, I am profoundly inter- ested in Political Economy, Macroeconometrics and music.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Peace Operations
    United Nations 2012 Peace Operations Cover photos (clockwise from top): A member of MINURSO’s Military Liaison Office chats with a group of local Western Saharans, June 2010. (UN Photo/Martine Perret) Crowds of locals surround the recently-dispatched UN monitoring team as they walk through the streets of Homs, Syria, April 2012. (UN Photo/Neeraj Singh) Women taking part in traditional dances in Dili, Timor-Leste. (UNMIT/Bernardino Soares) A Ghanaian peacekeeper serving with the United Nations Mission in Liberia, on guard duty during a visit by the Special Representative Karin Landgren, in Cestos City, Liberia, November 2012. (UNMIL/Staton Winter) 2 Year in Review 2012 Table of Contents Introduction: Evolving to meet new challenges 1 Interview: Hervé Ladsous, Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations 2 Interview: Ameerah Haq, Under-Secretary-General for Field Support 4 Interview: Jeffrey Feltman, Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs 6 PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS MINURSO: Ensuring a path to safety 9 MINUSTAH: From reconstruction to stabilization 11 MONUSCO: Progress interrupted 13 UNAMID: Protection of civilians, peace process at the forefront 15 UNDOF: Challenged like never before 17 UNFICYP: A delicate balancing act in Cyprus 18 UNIFIL: Helping to stabilize a region in turmoil 20 UNISFA: Volatility to stability 22 UNMIK: Promoting dialogue and freedom of movement 24 UNMIL: Meeting challenges on the path to lasting peace 25 UNMISS: Ensuring the security of civilians 27 UNMIT: A story of successful cooperation 29 UNOCI: Scaling
    [Show full text]
  • China's Contributions to United Nations
    THE DRAGON WITH THE BLUE BERET: CHINA’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS by Daniel Hayes Griffith B.A., The University of Oregon, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2010 © Daniel Hayes Griffith, 2010 Abstract Recently, academics and policy analysts alike have taken note of the People‘s Republic of China‘s increasing participation in United Nations peacekeeping operations (UNPKO). Since 2003, the overall number of Chinese personnel in UNPKO has climbed dramatically: from 120 in early 2003 to over 2,000 at present. However, while it is relatively easy to determine how many Chinese personnel serve in UNPKO, it is much more difficult to accurately determine China‘s motives for participation in the UN peacekeeping regime and its mission selection criteria. At present, there are three main schools of thought on this subject. Chinese officials and academics tend to argue that the PRC contributes to UNPKO because it is genuinely concerned about promoting international peace and security and alleviating human suffering. Other authors, primarily from the United States, argue that the PRC‘s motives are purely instrumental in nature. China, they contend, sends personnel to missions when doing so can increase the PRC‘s access to natural resources and markets or augment its overall diplomatic and military power. Finally, some authors vaguely contend that China‘s concerns over its international legitimacy play a role in its peacekeeping strategy. This thesis advances a new version of the international legitimacy explanation of Chinese peacekeeping participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's Participation in United Nations Peacekeeping
    254 BRAZIL’S PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS: EVOLUTION, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES Israel de Oliveira Andrade Eduarda Passarelli Hamann Matheus Augusto Soares 254 DISCUSSION PAPER Brasilia, January 2021 BRAZIL’S PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS: EVOLUTION, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES1, 2 Israel de Oliveira Andrade3 Eduarda Passarelli Hamann4 Matheus Augusto Soares5 1. The authors are grateful for the valuable contributions from Lieutenant-General Floriano Peixoto Vieira Neto; Antônio Jorge Ramalho da Rocha, professor of International Relations at University of Brasília; and Luiz Gustavo Aversa Franco, Giovanni Roriz Lyra Hillebrand, and Maurício Kenyatta Barros da Costa, researchers in the National Development Research Program (PNPD) at Ipea. They are exempt from any errors or omissions. Any remaining imperfections in the text are the sole responsibility of the authors. 2. This text corresponds to the translation of the research, published originally in Portuguese: A participação do Brasil nas operações de paz das Nações Unidas: evolução, desafios e oportunidades (Texto para Discussão, n. 2442, Ipea, 2019). 3. Researcher at Ipea. E-mail: <[email protected]>. 4. Senior researcher and special advisor at Instituto Igarapé. E-mail: <[email protected]>. 5. Researcher in the PNPD/Ipea. E-mail: <[email protected]>. Federal Government of Brazil DISCUSSION PAPER Ministry of Economy Minister Paulo Guedes A publication to disseminate the findings of research directly or indirectly
    [Show full text]