DOCSLIB.ORG

Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress . Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs June 23, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress c11173008 . Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Summary The Navy’s proposed FY2012 budget requests funding for the procurement of an 11th San Antonio (LPD-17) class amphibious ship. The Navy intends this ship to be the final ship in the class. The ship has received $184.0 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding, and the Navy’s proposed FY2012 budget requests the remaining $1,847.4 million needed to complete the ship’s estimated procurement cost of $2,031.4 million. The Navy plans to begin procuring a new class of amphibious ship called the LSD(X) in FY2017. Some observers have suggested using the LPD-17 design as the basis for the LSD(X). Navy officials do not stress this option and instead appear more interested in developing an all-new design for the LSD(X). If a decision were made to use the LPD-17 design as the basis for the LSD(X), then procuring a 12th LPD-17 in FY2014 or FY2015 would help keep the LPD-17 production line open until the procurement of the first LSD(X) in FY2017, which in turn might help reduce LSD(X) production costs. Issues for Congress include whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s proposed funding request for the 11th LPD-17, whether to encourage or direct the Navy to use the LPD-17 design as the basis for the design of the LSD(X), and—particularly if the LPD-17 design is used as the basis for the LSD(X)—whether to fund the procurement of a 12th LPD-17 in FY2014 or FY2015. Congressional Research Service . Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 Background ................................................................................................................................1 Amphibious Ships in General................................................................................................1 Roles and Missions of Amphibious Ships........................................................................1 Amphibious Lift Goal .....................................................................................................2 Current and Projected Force of Amphibious Ships...........................................................3 LPD-17 Program...................................................................................................................3 Program Origin...............................................................................................................3 Construction Shipyards ...................................................................................................4 Procurement History .......................................................................................................4 Cost Growth, Schedule Delays, and Construction Problems.............................................5 Option of Using LPD-17 Design as Basis for LSD(X).....................................................5 FY2012 Funding Request................................................................................................5 Issues for Congress .....................................................................................................................5 Legislative Activity For FY2012 .................................................................................................7 FY2012 Funding Request......................................................................................................7 FY2012 National Defense Authorization Bill (H.R. 1540) .....................................................7 House .............................................................................................................................7 FY2012 DOD Appropriations Bill (H.R. 2219)......................................................................8 House .............................................................................................................................8 Figures Figure 1. LPD-17 Class Amphibious Ship ...................................................................................4 Tables Table 1. Projected Number of Amphibious Ships, FY2012-FY2041.............................................3 Table 2. LPD-17 Procurement, FY1996-FY2011 .........................................................................5 Table A-1. Amphibious Lift Goals Since 1980.............................................................................9 Table A-2. MEB AE Lift Elements ............................................................................................ 11 Table A-3. Ships Required for Various Potential Lift Goals........................................................12 Appendixes Appendix A. Additional Information on Amphibious Lift Goal....................................................9 Appendix B. May 25, 2011, Navy Testimony on LPD-17 Program ............................................14 Appendix C. LPD-17 Cost Growth and Construction Problems .................................................17 Congressional Research Service . Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Contacts Author Contact Information ......................................................................................................56 Congressional Research Service . Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement Introduction This report provides background information and issues for Congress on the San Antonio (LPD- 17) class amphibious ship program. The Navy’s proposed FY2012 budget requests funding for the procurement of an 11th San Antonio (LPD-17) class amphibious ship. The Navy intends this ship to be the final ship in the class. Issues for Congress include whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s proposed funding request for the 11th LPD-17, whether to encourage or direct the Navy to use the LPD-17 design as the basis for the design of the LSD(X) class of amphibious ships that the Navy wants to begin procuring in FY2017, and—particularly if the LPD-17 design is used as the basis for the LSD(X)—whether to fund the procurement of a 12th LPD-17 in FY2014 or FY2015. Congress’s decisions on these issues will affect, among other things, Navy and Marine Corps funding requirements and capabilities, and the shipbuilding industrial base. Background Amphibious Ships in General1 Roles and Missions of Amphibious Ships The primary function of Navy amphibious ships is to lift (i.e., transport) U.S. Marines and their equipment and supplies to distant operating areas, and enable Marines to conduct expeditionary operations ashore in those areas. Although amphibious ships are designed to support Marine landings against opposing military forces, they are also used for operations in permissive or benign situations where there are no opposing forces. Due to their large storage spaces and their ability to use helicopters and landing craft to transfer people, equipment, and supplies from ship to shore without need for port facilities,2 amphibious ships are potentially useful for a range of 3 non-combat and combat operations. 1 Navy amphibious ships can be divided into two main groups—the so-called “big-deck” amphibious assault ships, designated LHA and LHD, which look like medium-sized aircraft carriers, and the smaller (but still sizeable) amphibious ships designated LSD or LPD, which are sometimes called “small-deck” amphibious ships. U.S. Navy amphibious ships have designations starting with the letter L, as in amphibious landing. LHA can be translated as landing ship, helicopter-capable, assault. LHD can be translated as landing ship, helicopter-capable, well deck. LSD can be translated as landing ship, well deck. LPD can be translated as landing ship, helicopter platform, well deck. Whether noted in the designation or not, all these ships have well decks. The LHAs and LHDs have large flight decks and hangar decks for embarking and operating numerous helicopters and VTOL fixed-wing aircraft, while the LSDs and LPDs have much smaller flight decks and hangar decks for embarking and operating smaller numbers of helicopters. The LHAs and LHDs, as bigger ships, in general can individually embark more Marines and equipment than the LSDs and LPDs. 2 Amphibious ships have berthing spaces for Marines; storage space for their wheeled vehicles, their other combat equipment, and their supplies; flight decks and hangar decks for their helicopters and vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) fixed-wing aircraft; and well decks for storing and launching their landing craft. (A well deck is a large, garage-like space in the stern of the ship. It can be flooded with water so that landing craft can leave or return to the ship. Access to the well deck is protected by a large stern gate that is somewhat like a garage door.) 3 Amphibious ships and their embarked Marine forces can be used for launching and conducting humanitarian- assistance and disaster-response (HA/DR) operations; peacetime engagement and partnership-building activities, such (continued...) Congressional Research Service 1 . Navy LPD-17 Amphibious Ship Procurement On any given day, some of the Navy’s amphibious ships, like some of the Navy’s other ships, are forward-deployed to various overseas operating areas. Forward-deployed U.S. Navy amphibious ships are often
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report $2B
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INGALLS INDUSTRIES HUNTINGTON 2019 annual RE P ort $2B HII HAS INVESTED NEARLY $2 BILLION IN CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS AT ITS INGALLS AND NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING FACILITIES TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCIES AND AFFORDABILITY ACROSS THE ENTERPRISE. Ingalls Shipbuilding, in Pascagoula, Mississippi, is the largest supplier of U.S. Navy surface combatants. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES Huntington Ingalls Industries is America’s largest military shipbuilding company and a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. For more than a century, HII’s Newport News and Ingalls shipbuilding divisions in Virginia and Mississippi have built more ships in more ship classes than any other U.S. naval shipbuilder. HII’s Technical Solutions division supports national security missions around the globe with unmanned systems, defense and federal solutions, nuclear and environmental services, and fleet sustainment. Headquartered in Newport News, Virginia, HII employs more than 42,000 people operating both domestically and internationally. Cover Image: Newport News Shipbuilding delivered USS Delaware (SSN 791) to the U.S. Navy in 2019. FINANCIAL OPERATING RESULTS ($ in millions, except per share amounts) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Sales and Service Revenues $ 8,899 $ 8,176 $ 7,441 $ 7,068 $ 7,020 Operating Income 736 951 881 876 774 Operating Margin 8.3 % 11.6 % 11.8 % 12.4 % 11.0 % (1) Adjusted Segment Operating Income 660 663 688 715 769 Adjusted Segment Operating Margin (1) 7.4 % 8.1 % 9.2 % 10.1 % 11.0 % Diluted EPS 13.26 19.09 10.46 12.14 8.36 (2) Adjusted Diluted EPS 14.01 19.09 12.14 12.14 10.55 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 896 914 814 822 861 (1)Adjusted Segment Operating Income and Adjusted Segment Operating Margin are non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the operating FAS/CAS adjustment, non-current state income taxes, goodwill impairment charges and purchased intangibles impairment charges.
    [Show full text]
  • USCGC Glacier (WAGB-4)
    NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: USS Glacier (AGB-4) USCGC Glacier (WAGB-4) USCGC Glacier underway circa 1966-1972. Photo courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard. The icebreaker Glacier. Vessel History The former U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Glacier is an oceangoing icebreaker that was originally designed and constructed for the U.S. Navy in the mid-1950s. In 1966, Glacier was transferred to the Coast Guard. Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, Mississippi began constructing the icebreaker in August 1953 and delivered the ship to the U.S. Navy in May 1955. It was named for Glacier Bay, Alaska, and was the fourth ship to carry this name. After its initial shakedown cruise, Glacier sailed from its homeport of Boston, Massachusetts as Admiral Richard E. Byrd’s flagship bound for the Antarctic as part of Operation Deep Freeze I1 in late 1955. It reached the 1 Operation Deep Freeze I was the codename for a series of scientific expeditions to Antarctica in 1955-56. The impetus behind the expeditions was the International Geophysical Year 1957-58. IGY was a collaborative effort of 40 nations to study the North and South Poles and points in between. Their goal was to advance knowledge of Antarctic hydrography and weather systems, glacial movements, and marine life. The U.S. Navy was charged with supporting the U.S. scientists for their portion of the IGY studies. 2 Ross Ice Pack in December where it smashed through thick ice “carving” out a harbor in Kainan Bay for ships delivering materials, supplies, and labor for the construction of Little America V.2 After clearing a channel and leading a group of ships to Kainan Bay, Glacier headed toward the Ross Ice Shelf to assist in the construction of a naval air station at McMurdo Sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Jolts in U.S. Arms Transfers: the Post Cold War Security Environment Jane Misheloff Dissertation Submitted to the Facult
    Policy Jolts in U.S. Arms Transfers: The Post Cold War Security Environment Jane Misheloff Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for a Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration and Policy Philip S. Kronenberg, Chair Sumner Benson Edward M. Kaitz Orion F. White James F. Wolf May 1999 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: Conventional Arms Exports, Transfers Copyright 1999, Jane Misheloff Policy Jolts in U.S. Arms Transfers: The Post Cold War Security Environment Jane Misheloff (ABSTRACT) This research addresses the subject of conventional arms transfers in the Post Cold War Era. ("Conventional arms" herein are defined as high cost, state-of-the-art weapons systems in aerospace, land vehicles, missiles and naval vessels. ") The rapid and startling changes in the international political environment that took place in the late 1980's forced the U.S. and her Western Allies to reexamine their national defense budgets. The Bush Administration responded to the situation with new policy initiatives or "jolts" that aligned the annual U.S. Department of Defense's budget with Post Cold War realities. (A "jolt" is defined here as a sudden "shock" to a system that has the potential to alter radically one or more of its established structural components or behavioral patterns.) The word "jolt" is specifically used because while the policies reducing force strength and decreasing defense spending had been introduced on earlier occasions since the end of World War II, these particular jolts were driven by different circumstances than previous drawdowns. The Cold War that had dominated and shaped international affairs was over; the Post Cold War era promised to be a radical departure from the 50-year long status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Transformation and the Defense Industry After Next
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons Newport Papers Special Collections 2003 Military Transformation and the Defense Industry after Next Peter J. Dombrowski Eugene Gholz Andrew L. Ross Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/usnwc-newport-papers Recommended Citation Dombrowski, Peter J.; Gholz, Eugene; and L., Andrew Ross, "Military Transformation and the Defense Industry after Next" (2003). Newport Papers. 17. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/usnwc-newport-papers/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Newport Papers by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cover This perspective aerial view of Newport, Rhode Island, drawn and published by Galt & Hoy of New York, circa 1878, is found in the American Memory Online Map Collections: 1500–2003, of the Library of Congress Geography and Map Division, Washington, D.C. The map may be viewed at http://hdl.loc.gov/ loc.gmd/g3774n.pm008790 Military Transformation and the Defense Industry after Next The Defense Industrial Implications of Network-Centric Warfare Peter J. Dombrowski Eugene Gholz Andrew L. Ross NAVAL WAR COLLEGE 686 Cushing Road Newport, Rhode Island 02841-1207 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dombrowski, Peter J., 1963– Military transformation and the defense industry after next: the defense industrial implications of network-centric warfare / Peter J. Dombrowski, Eugene Gholz, Andrew L. Ross. p.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • Huntington Ingalls Fact Sheet
    For more information, contact: Beci Brenton | 202- 264-7143 | [email protected] About Us Huntington Ingalls Industries is America’s largest military shipbuilding company and a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. For more than a century, HII’s Newport News and Ingalls shipbuilding divisions in Virginia and Mississippi have built more ships in more ship classes than any other U.S. naval shipbuilder. HII’s Technical Solutions division supports national security missions around the globe with unmanned systems, nuclear and environmental services, and defense and federal solutions. Headquartered in Newport News, Virginia, HII employs more than 42,000 people operating both domestically and internationally. For more information, visit: www.huntingtoningalls.com. By the Numbers Newport News Shipbuilding (Newport News, Va.) • Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines, overhaul, repair, maintenance and fleet support • 550 acres, over 26,000 employees Ingalls Shipbuilding (Pascagoula, Miss.) • Surface combatants, amphibious assault & transport, Coast Guard Cutters, fleet support • 800 acres, about 11,500 employees Technical Solutions • National security missions around the globe with unmanned systems, nuclear and environmental services, and defense and federal solutions • 45 states and 16 countries, approximately 4,500 employees Updated February 11, 2021 Huntington Ingalls Industries - Fact Sheet/Page 2 Facts at a Glance Annual revenues of approximately $8.9 billion, current backlog of $46 billion (as of February 11, 2021). Builder of the most complex ships in the world for more than 135 years at Newport News, and 82 years at Ingalls. Sole builder of U.S. Navy aircraft carriers, the world’s largest warships, and one of two builders constructing nuclear-powered submarines.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, March 9, 2020
    MONDAY, MARCH 9, 2020 WILLIAM (IKE) WHITE Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary of Science overseeing the US DOE Office of Environmental Management 0800 – 0945 – Phoenix Convention Center, Level Three, 301CD William (Ike) White is the Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary of Science overseeing the Office of Environmental Management. He began in this capacity in June 2019 to provide leadership for the safe cleanup of the environmental legacy brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development and government-sponsored nuclear energy research. Prior to this position, he served as the Chief of Staff and Associate Principal Deputy Administrator for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). In this capacity he served as the primary point of contact within the Office of the Administrator for field office managers and provided leadership and coordination on a wide range of complex operational and technical issues at NNSA sites. White also served as a member of NNSA’s executive leadership team, providing advice to the Administrator and Principal Deputy Administrator on programmatic and policy issues. Previously, White was the Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety and Health. The Office of the Associate Administrator for Safety and Health, which is now part of the Office of Safety, Infrastructure and Operations, enabled the NNSA mission in the areas of nuclear and occupational safety, directly supporting the Administrator and senior managers throughout the NNSA enterprise. Earlier in his career, White served in a variety of leadership and technical positions in NNSA and at the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board focused on nuclear safety and operations. White has a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of Mississippi and a Master of Science in engineering from the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Consequences of Investing in Shipbuilding Case Studies in the United States and Sweden
    The Economic Consequences of Investing in Shipbuilding Case Studies in the United States and Sweden Edward G. Keating, Irina Danescu, Dan Jenkins, James Black, Robert Murphy, Deborah Peetz, Sarah H. Bana C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1036 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9036-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Littoral Combat Ship 6 (Jackson) and 8 (Montgomery) under construction in the Mobile River at Austal USA’s site in Mobile, Alabama (photo by Irina Danescu). Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Biographies
    Executive Biographies Brian Cuccias Executive Vice President and President, Ingalls Shipbuilding Brian Cuccias is executive vice president of Huntington Ingalls Industries and president of Ingalls Shipbuilding. Named to this position in 2014, he is responsible for all programs and operations at Ingalls, including U.S. Navy destroyers, amphibious assault and surface combatant programs, and the U.S. Coast Guard cutter program. Cuccias began his shipbuilding career in 1979 with Litton Data Systems, where he served as a financial analyst on several Navy programs, including amphibious assault ships and Spruance– and Kidd-class destroyers. Since then, he has held a number of positions of increasing responsibility, including: assistant to the group vice president of Avondale Industries; sector vice president, material, for Northrop Grumman Ship Systems; program manager and vice president for Northrop Grumman’s DDG 1000 program; and vice president, surface combatants, for Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, which included Arleigh Burke-class (DDG 51) and Zumwalt-class (DDG 1000) destroyers and Coast Guard programs. Most recently, Cuccias served as Ingalls’ vice president, program management, responsible for program execution and financial performance for all ships produced by the shipyard. He earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of South Alabama and has attended executive education programs at Harvard Business School and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. He serves on the Mississippi Economic Council Board of Governors and on the board of directors for the Mississippi Partnership for Economic Development, the Jackson County Economic Development Foundation and the Salvation Army of Mobile. Huntington Ingalls Industries is America’s largest military shipbuilding company and a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Our Communities
    TRANSFORMING OUR COMMUNITIES 2019 | REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY 1 Huntington Ingalls Industries is America’s largest military shipbuilding company and a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. For more than a century, HII’s Newport News and Ingalls shipbuilding divisions in Virginia and Mississippi have built more ships in more ship classes than any other OUR DIVISIONS U.S. naval shipbuilder. HII’s Technical Solutions division supports national security missions around the globe with unmanned systems, defense and federal solutions, Ingalls nuclear and environmental services and fleet sustainment. Headquartered in Shipbuilding Newport News, Virginia, HII employs more than 42,000 people operating both domestically and internationally. Newport News Shipbuilding OUR CHARITABLE INVESTMENTS Technical Solutions OUR VALUES 1% Integrity 33% Safety 3% Honesty 8% Engagement Responsibility TOTAL 10% $5,983,206 Performance 18% 13% 14% Education Programs ................................................... $1,973,927 United Way .................................................................... $1,096,000 Health & Human Services Programs ........................$810,700 Cover: Technical Solutions employees Civic/Community Support .......................................... $789,899 helped clean He’eia Fishpond on the island of Oahu, Hawaii, during Technical Youth Programs ..............................................................$576,200 Solutions’ Global Day of Caring. Right: Children whose parents Veterans/Military
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Survey of China's Dynamic Shipbuilding Industry
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons CMSI Red Books Reports & Studies 8-2008 A Comprehensive Survey of China's Dynamic Shipbuilding Industry Gabriel Collins Michael C. Grubb U.S. Navy Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-red-books Recommended Citation Collins, Gabriel and Grubb, Michael C., "A Comprehensive Survey of China's Dynamic Shipbuilding Industry" (2008). CMSI Red Books, Study No. 1. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Reports & Studies at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CMSI Red Books by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U.S. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE CHINA MARITIME STUDIES Number 1 U.S. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE WAR NAVAL U.S. A Comprehensive Survey of China’s Dynamic Shipbuilding Industry Commercial Development and Strategic Implications CHINA MARITIME STUDIES No. 1 MARITIMESTUDIESNo. CHINA Gabriel Collins and Lieutenant Commander Michael C. Grubb, U.S. Navy A Comprehensive Survey of China’s Dynamic Shipbuilding Industry Commercial Development and Strategic Implications Gabriel Collins and Lieutenant Commander Michael C. Grubb, U.S. Navy CHINA MARITIME STUDIES INSTITUTE U.S. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island www.nwc.navy.mil/cnws/cmsi/default.aspx Naval War College The China Maritime Studies are extended research projects Newport, Rhode Island that the editor, the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies, and the Center for Naval Warfare Studies President of the Naval War College consider of particular China Maritime Study No.
    [Show full text]
  • Northrop Grumman-Built Aegis Destroyer Christened at Ingalls Shipbuilding
    Northrop Grumman-Built Aegis Destroyer Christened at Ingalls Shipbuilding June 11, 2001 PASCAGOULA, Miss., June 9, 2001 -- America's newest Aegis guided missile destroyer, PREBLE (DDG 88), was christened today at Ingalls Shipbuilding, a Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) company, when U.S. Rep. Edward L. Schrock of Virginia called for increasing the number of ships built annually by seven to eight ships. Technologically advanced U.S. Navy ships like the PREBLE "will permit America to keep its commitments to defend our shores, protect our interests, shield our allies, and promote peace, trade and democracy throughout the world," said Rep. Schrock, who represents Virginia's second congressional district. A retired Navy captain who served in Vietnam, Rep. Schrock was the principal speaker at the christening of PREBLE, named for a Revolutionary War hero. "PREBLE will be able to strike at targets hundreds of miles away, while maintaining her status as the least vulnerable military platform other than a submarine," Rep. Schrock said. "She can strike her adversaries wherever they exist, whether ashore, in the sky, on the seas or under the seas, and in the future, PREBLE will be a critical part of the sea-based missile defense system shielding America and her allies from weapons of mass destruction." The congressman said when commissioned in 2002, PREBLE will join a fleet of approximately 316 ships, down from 600 ships more than a decade ago. He noted that at the current rate of construction, in the next eight years, the U.S. fleet will be reduced to approximately 180 ships. At any given time, approximately a third of our fleet is deployed, a third is en route to and from deployment and a third is at home undergoing maintenance.
    [Show full text]