Expressions of Personal Autonomy, Authority, and Agency in Early Anglo- Saxon Monasticism William Tanner Smoot [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expressions of Personal Autonomy, Authority, and Agency in Early Anglo- Saxon Monasticism William Tanner Smoot Smoot17@Live.Marshall.Edu Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2017 In the Company of Angels: Expressions of Personal Autonomy, Authority, and Agency in Early Anglo- Saxon Monasticism William Tanner Smoot [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Smoot, William Tanner, "In the Company of Angels: Expressions of Personal Autonomy, Authority, and Agency in Early Anglo-Saxon Monasticism" (2017). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1094. http://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1094 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. IN THE COMPANY OF ANGELS: EXPRESSIONS OF PERSONAL AUTONOMY, AUTHORITY, AND AGENCY IN EARLY ANGLO-SAXON MONASTICISM A thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History by William Tanner Smoot Approved by Dr. Laura Michele Diener, Committee Chairperson Dr. William Palmer Dr. Michael Woods Marshall University May 2017 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all of those who helped and supported me in the process of writing and completing this thesis. I want to thank specifically my family and friends for their inexhaustible support, as well as the faculty of the history department of Marshall University for their constant guidance and advice. I finally would like to particularly thank Dr. Laura Michele Diener for the significant time she spent in reviewing and advising my work. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract vi Chapter I: Introduction 1 Chapter II: Practical Communal Autonomy 29 Autonomy in Foundation 30 Monastic Rules 43 Abbot Election 54 Chapter III: Individual Temporal Autonomy and Authority 67 Choice of Residence 68 Monastic Networks 85 Secular Relationships and Political Power 113 Chapter IV: Autonomy in Contemplative Desire and Retirement 123 Desire for Freedom in God 123 St. Aidan of Lindisfarne 126 St. Cuthbert of Lindisfarne 131 St. Guthlac of Crowland 145 Chapter V: Social Understanding of Contemplative Eremitism and Spiritual Liberation 151 Contemplative Desire 152 Hermitic Surroundings 161 Spiritual Autonomy 179 Chapter VI: Conclusion 205 References 214 Appendix A: Office of Research Integrity Approval Letter 220 iv Appendix B: VITA 221 v ABSTRACT In this thesis I examine the opportunities for individual agency and social and spiritual autonomy in the seventh-and-eighth-century Anglo-Saxon kingdoms occasioned by the introduction and development of Christian monasticism. The term “autonomy” concerns the degree to which individuals managed to determine the social order and nature, as well as spiritual character, of their ensuing lives through an adherence to monastic practice. Early Anglo-Saxon Christianity assumed a monastic character, and from the outset coenobitic communities acquired and maintained certain rights regarding their internal governance and social development from their ecclesiastic and secular superiors, which conceptually separated religious households from those of the secular nobility. I argue that monastic foundation and participation functioned as an alternative means for social engagement, and spiritually justified and legitimized otherwise culturally unorthodox behaviors such as anchoritic retreat. I consider monasticism’s social and spiritual consequences on individual self-determination. I argue that monastic participation constituted a considerable degree of both collective communal and personal autonomy in regards to an institution’s physical foundation, inner governance through the establishment of a monastic rule, and ability to select subsequent abbots and rulers independent of external influence. I consider the active lives of monastics such as Wilfrid of Ripon, Hild of Whitby, and Ceolfrith of Wearmouth and Jarrow to further suggest the considerable degree of autonomy monastic leaders exercised in their administration of vast monastic properties. I additionally argue that despite the temporal wealth and authority that often accompanied monastic administration, monasticism’s introduction of contemplative eremitism constituted a legitimate alternative to the social obligations inherent in coenobitic practice, and represented an extreme expression of individual autonomy. I finally consider the hagiographic narratives and contemporary social image of vi anchoritic saints such as St. Cuthbert of Lindisfarne and St. Guthlac of Crowland. I argue that regardless of any power and authority achievable within the physical and temporal world, contemporary religious writers understood complete contemplative withdrawal from society as the ultimate expression of spiritual autonomy, whereby an anchorite positioned their mind towards God alone, and therefore freed themselves from the trivialities and distractions of the world. vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The introduction and growth of Christianity in England during the seventh and eighth centuries precipitated an extraordinary period of social redefinition and restructuring within the existing Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, as the new religion conveyed the concepts and practical mechanisms of a parallel continental Christian culture. In addition to theological considerations, the Anglo-Saxons’ assimilation within a broad and shared Christian tradition influenced the future development of numerous aspects of domestic society, from economic transactions and land ownership rights, to political and judicial codification, to literary and poetic expression. The subsequent introduction of pre-established traditions and institutions of continental Christendom, in particular those of coenobitic and anchoritic monasticism, provided a means through which individual monastic adherents expressed a degree of self-determination otherwise unknown within contemporary secular society. The most prominent Anglo-Saxon religious communities of the seventh and eighth-centuries drew organizational and spiritual influence from well-developed continental monastic conventions, inaugurating a social alternative within an Anglo-Saxon society complete with its own expected norms and obligations, as they established themselves alongside secular households. From the outset, Anglo-Saxon monastic communities seemingly enjoyed certain institutional rights, which at once solidified their expected role within secular society, while simultaneously exempting monastics from participating in specific secular social duties and obligations. While monastic foundation and governance assumed various forms in the seventh and eighth centuries, the novel career opportunities monastic communities provided for both young and old raises important questions as to the character of contemporary Anglo-Saxon society, and an individual’s role within it as it acclimatized to the development of a parallel 1 religious social order. What did monastic adherence mean for those individuals who both established and entered coenobitic communities of the seventh and eighth centuries? What was an individual monk’s practical relationship to both their new coenobitic community and the broader secular society they previously inhabited? What opportunities existed within a monastic context for self-determination and individual autonomy in regards to one’s career choice, manner and order of living, material security and aggrandizement, and expression of spiritual desire? How did seventh-and-eighth-century Anglo-Saxons understand individual self-determination and autonomy? The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the opportunities for individual monastic expressions of self-determination and autonomy in regards to an individual’s social and spiritual life occasioned by the development of monasticism in the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of the seventh and eighth centuries. I examine the relationship individual monks maintained between both their monastic and secular societies, and what their participation within each of these two social systems meant in regards to their ability to condition various aspects of their lives, from the order of their daily existence within a particular religious house, to the character of their spiritual and contemplative behaviors in eremitic solitude. I also consider the differences in practical monastic self-determination, often achieved through coenobitic foundation and administration, and contemporary religious society’s conception as to what constituted true and absolute liberation from all manners of worldly influence, frequently expounded within hagiographic literature through an association with anchoritic behaviors. What does the term personal “autonomy” here reference? The word itself has its foundations in the Greek autos (self) and nomos (law); therefore, proving appropriately applicable to those behaviors expressed by early English monastics, whereby their personal 2 inclinations as to their position within religious and secular society anticipated like results. Contemporary writers convey an understanding of individual religious, and specifically coenobitic and anchoritic monastic, expression as inherently liberating in contrast to secular preoccupation. While charters, law codes, and historical synodical records all reveal an exercised self-governance among monastic communities as
Recommended publications
  • Lesser Feasts and Fasts 2018
    Lesser Feasts and Fasts 2018 Conforming to General Convention 2018 1 Preface Christians have since ancient times honored men and women whose lives represent heroic commitment to Christ and who have borne witness to their faith even at the cost of their lives. Such witnesses, by the grace of God, live in every age. The criteria used in the selection of those to be commemorated in the Episcopal Church are set out below and represent a growing consensus among provinces of the Anglican Communion also engaged in enriching their calendars. What we celebrate in the lives of the saints is the presence of Christ expressing itself in and through particular lives lived in the midst of specific historical circumstances. In the saints we are not dealing primarily with absolutes of perfection but human lives, in all their diversity, open to the motions of the Holy Spirit. Many a holy life, when carefully examined, will reveal flaws or the bias of a particular moment in history or ecclesial perspective. It should encourage us to realize that the saints, like us, are first and foremost redeemed sinners in whom the risen Christ’s words to St. Paul come to fulfillment, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” The “lesser feasts” provide opportunities for optional observance. They are not intended to replace the fundamental celebration of Sunday and major Holy Days. As the Standing Liturgical Commission and the General Convention add or delete names from the calendar, successive editions of this volume will be published, each edition bearing in the title the date of the General Convention to which it is a response.
    [Show full text]
  • Bede's Ecclesiastical History of England a Revised
    BEDE'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF ENGLAND A REVISED TRANSLATION WITH INTRODUCTION, LIFE, AND NOTES BY A. M. SELLAR LATE VICE-PRINCIPAL OF LADY MARGARET HALL, OXFORD LONDON GEORGE BELL AND SONS 1907 EDITOR'S PREFACE The English version of the "Ecclesiastical History" in the following pages is a revision of the translation of Dr. Giles, which is itself a revision of the earlier rendering of Stevens. In the present edition very considerable alterations have been made, but the work of Dr. Giles remains the basis of the translation. The Latin text used throughout is Mr. Plummer's. Since the edition of Dr. Giles appeared in 1842, so much fresh work on the subject has been done, and recent research has brought so many new facts to light, that it has been found necessary to rewrite the notes almost entirely, and to add a new introduction. After the appearance of Mr. Plummer's edition of the Historical Works of Bede, it might seem superfluous, for the present at least, to write any notes at all on the "Ecclesiastical History." The present volume, however, is intended to fulfil a different and much humbler function. There has been no attempt at any original work, and no new theories are advanced. The object of the book is merely to present in a short and convenient form the substance of the views held by trustworthy authorities, and it is hoped that it may be found useful by those students who have either no time or no inclination to deal with more important works. Among the books of which most use has been made, are Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Cloud of Witnesses.Indd
    A Great Cloud of Witnesses i ii A Great Cloud of Witnesses A Calendar of Commemorations iii Copyright © 2016 by The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America Portions of this book may be reproduced by a congregation for its own use. Commercial or large-scale reproduction for sale of any portion of this book or of the book as a whole, without the written permission of Church Publishing Incorporated, is prohibited. Cover design and typesetting by Linda Brooks ISBN-13: 978-0-89869-962-3 (binder) ISBN-13: 978-0-89869-966-1 (pbk.) ISBN-13: 978-0-89869-963-0 (ebook) Church Publishing, Incorporated. 19 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 www.churchpublishing.org iv Contents Introduction vii On Commemorations and the Book of Common Prayer viii On the Making of Saints x How to Use These Materials xiii Commemorations Calendar of Commemorations Commemorations Appendix a1 Commons of Saints and Propers for Various Occasions a5 Commons of Saints a7 Various Occasions from the Book of Common Prayer a37 New Propers for Various Occasions a63 Guidelines for Continuing Alteration of the Calendar a71 Criteria for Additions to A Great Cloud of Witnesses a73 Procedures for Local Calendars and Memorials a75 Procedures for Churchwide Recognition a76 Procedures to Remove Commemorations a77 v vi Introduction This volume, A Great Cloud of Witnesses, is a further step in the development of liturgical commemorations within the life of The Episcopal Church. These developments fall under three categories. First, this volume presents a wide array of possible commemorations for individuals and congregations to observe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom of Mercia and the Origins and Distribution of Common Fields*
    The Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia and the origins and distribution of common fields* by Susan Oosthuizen Abstract: This paper aims to explore the hypothesis that the agricultural layouts and organisation that had de- veloped into common fields by the high middle ages may have had their origins in the ‘long’ eighth century, between about 670 and 840 AD. It begins by reiterating the distinction between medieval open and common fields, and the problems that inhibit current explanations for their period of origin and distribution. The distribution of common fields is reviewed and the coincidence with the kingdom of Mercia noted. Evidence pointing towards an earlier date for the origin of fields is reviewed. Current views of Mercia in the ‘long’ eighth century are discussed and it is shown that the kingdom had both the cultural and economic vitality to implement far-reaching landscape organisation. The proposition that early forms of these field systems may have originated in the ‘long’ eighth century is considered, and the paper concludes with suggestions for further research. Open and common fields (a specialised form of open field) endured in the English landscape for over a thousand years and their physical remains still survive in many places. A great deal is known and understood about their distribution and physical appearance, about their man- agement from their peak in the thirteenth century through the changes of the later medieval and early modern periods, and about how and when they disappeared. Their origins, however, present a continuing problem partly, at least, because of the difficulties in extrapolating in- formation about such beginnings from documentary sources and upstanding earthworks that record – or fossilise – mature or even late field systems.
    [Show full text]
  • St Cuthbert Story
    Cuthbert was born about the year 634 (about 1400 years ago!) He lived in Melrose in Southern Scotland. He liked to walk in the hills. One night, when he was helping to look after sheep he thought he saw angels taking a soul to heaven. A few days later he found out Saint Aidan had died. Cuthbert decided to become a monk. He became a monk at the monastery in Melrose where he met Boisil, the prior of the monastery. Boisil taught Cuthbert for 6 years. Before Boisil died, he told Cuthbert he would be a Bishop one day. Cuthbert liked to visit lonely farms and villages. Crowds of people came to visit him. He lived at Melrose monastery for 13 years. Cuthbert was sent to be Prior of Lindisfarne. Cuthbert taught the monks the new Roman church rules. Some of the monks did not like the new rules and Cuthbert had to be very patient with them. After 12 years, Cuthbert went to live on a quiet island 7 miles away from Lindisfarne. Cuthbert lived on this small island for 3 years. He grew barley and vegetables and his monks dug a well and built a guest house for visitors. The King asked Cuthbert to be Bishop of Hexham. Cuthbert didn’t want to but he still remembered what Boisil had said. Cuthbert did not want to be Bishop of Hexham but agreed to be Bishop of Lindisfarne instead. He was very sad to have to leave his small island. Cuthbert was Bishop of Lindisfarne for 2 years. The people loved him.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Alban and the Cult of Saints in Late Antique Britain
    Saint Alban and the Cult of Saints in Late Antique Britain Michael Moises Garcia Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Institute for Medieval Studies August, 2010 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Michael Moises Garcia to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2010 The University of Leeds and Michael Moises Garcia iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I must thank my amazing wife Kat, without whom I would not have been able to accomplish this work. I am also grateful to the rest of my family: my mother Peggy, and my sisters Jolie, Julie and Joelle. Their encouragement was invaluable. No less important was the support from my supervisors, Ian Wood, Richard Morris, and Mary Swan, as well as my advising tutor, Roger Martlew. They have demonstrated remarkable patience and provided assistance above and beyond the call of duty. Many of my colleagues at the University of Leeds provided generous aid throughout the past few years. Among them I must especially thcmk Thom Gobbitt, Lauren Moreau, Zsuzsanna Papp Reed, Alex Domingue, Meritxell Perez-Martinez, Erin Thomas Daily, Mark Tizzoni, and all denizens of the Le Patourel room, past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Praying with the Celtic Saints
    PRAYING WITH THE CELTIC SAINTS ST AIDAN ‘Flame of the North’ We light this candle, because Christ is the Light no darkness can extinguish In the name of the sending Father, in the name of the gentle Son, in the name of the teaching Spirit, in Love’s name, the Three-in-One. We come humbly into your presence, Lord. Open our very being to your Truth and fill us with your love and peace. Amen. A LINDISFARNE RHYTHM OF PRAISE Ebb tide, full tide, praise the Lord of land and sea! Barren rocks, darting birds praise His holy name! Poor folk, ruling folk, praise the Lord of land and sea! Pilgrimed sands, sea-shelled strands, praise His holy name! Fierce lions, gentle lambs, praise the Lord of land and sea! Noble women, mission priests, praise His holy name! Chanting boys, slaves set free, praise the Lord of land and sea! Old and young and all the land, praise His holy name! SCRIPTURE Leviticus 19:18 Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbour as yourself. I am the LORD. Mark 12 : 29-31 ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength’. The second is this: ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these. James 2 : 1-5 and 8-9 My brothers and sisters: believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ must not show favouritism.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Eddius Stephanus' Life of Wilfrid: the Struggle for Authority Over the English Church in the Late Seventh Century
    Intro to the Early Middle Ages Fall 2000 Stefanie Weisman Prof. Kosto An Analysis of Eddius Stephanus' Life of Wilfrid: The Struggle for Authority Over the English Church In the Late Seventh Century In the year 664,1 a multitude of English bishops, abbots and priests -- as well as Oswiu and Alhfrith, the kings of Northumbria -- convened at the Abbey of Whitby.2 Their purpose, according to the monk Eddius Stephanus in his Life of Wilfrid, was to decide when Easter should be celebrated.3 At the time, there were two ways of calculating the date of this holiday. One method was sanctioned by the Apostolic See in Rome and used by clerics throughout Christendom.4 The churchmen of northern England, Ireland and Scotland, however, determined the date in a slightly different manner.5 Although the two methods produced dates that varied by no more than a day,6 this was enough to merit the gathering of this synod in Whitby. In Stephanus’ Life, King Oswiu asks the question that was at the heart of the matter for those assembled at the abbey: “which is greater in the Kingdom of Heaven, Columba or the apostle Peter?”7 The Irish saint Columba represented the Celtic tradition of Christianity and its rules, such as the unique way of calculating Easter, which had dominated the Church of northern England for several decades.8 Saint Peter, who was the first bishop of Rome, symbolized the distant Apostolic See and its laws and practices.9 Oswiu’s question, therefore, implies that the churchmen in Whitby had to make the following decision: would the English Church be subject to Rome and obey the tenets of the Pope, or would it remain relatively independent of the Holy See and follow the Celtic discipline? The synod resolved to celebrate Easter according to the Roman method.10 Their decision was based largely on the belief that the Messiah had granted primacy over all of Christendom to the Apostolic See.
    [Show full text]
  • ANGLO-SAXON ENGLAND Her Mon Mæg Giet Gesion Hiora Swæð
    CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS ANGLO-SAXON ENGLAND Her mon mæg giet gesion hiora swæð EXECUTIVE EDITORS Simon Keynes, Rosalind Love and Andy Orchard Editorial Assistant Dr Brittany Schorn ([email protected]) ADVISORY EDITORIAL BOARD Professor Robert Bjork, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85287-4402, USA Professor John Blair, The Queen’s College, Oxford OX1 4AW, UK Professor Mary Clayton, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Dr Richard Dance, St Catharine’s College, Cambridge CB2 1RL, UK Professor Roberta Frank, Dept of English, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA Professor Richard Gameson, Dept of History, Durham University, Durham DH1 3EX, UK Professor Helmut Gneuss, Universität München, Germany Professor Simon Keynes, Trinity College, Cambridge CB2 1TQ, UK Professor Michael Lapidge, Clare College, Cambridge CB2 1TL, UK Professor Patrizia Lendinara, Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione, Palermo, Italy Dr Rosalind Love, Robinson College, Cambridge CB3 9AN, UK Dr Rory Naismith, Clare College, Cambridge CB2 1TL, UK Professor Katherine O’Brien O’Keeffe, University of California, Berkeley, USA Professor Andrew Orchard, Pembroke College, Oxford OX1 1DW, UK Professor Paul G. Remley, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4330, USA Professor Paul E. Szarmach, Medieval Academy of America, Cambridge MA 02138, USA PRODUCTION TEAM AT THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Sarah Westlake (Production Editor, Journals) <[email protected]> Daniel Pearce (Commissioning Editor) <[email protected]> Cambridge University Press, Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS Clare Orchard (copyeditor) < [email protected]> Dr Debby Banham (proofreader) <[email protected]> CONTACTING MEMBERS OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD If in need of guidance whilst preparing a contribution, prospective contributors may wish to make contact with an editor whose area of interest and expertise is close to their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Codex Amiatinus
    LOCAL STUDIES CENTRE FACT SHEET NUMBER 23 The Codex Amiatinus Abbot Ceolfrith, who succeeded Benedict Biscop as Abbot of the twin monastery of Wearmouth-Jarrow. The Bibles were made in the monastic scriptorium during his abbacy, 690-716 AD. It was a remarkable thing to undertake at the time; usually copies of books of the Bible were produced as single volumes (eg, the Book of Psalms) or volumes containing a small number of books (eg, the four Gospels). Ceolfrith intended to carry the Codex Amiatinus to Rome in AD 716 as a gift to Pope Gregory II. He left Wearmouth with an entourage of 80 followers, intending to spend his last days in Rome, but died in Langres monastery in France en route. Some of his followers took the Codex Amiatinus on to Rome and presented it to the Pope to fulfil Ceolfrith’s wishes. The later history of the book is unknown until it reappeared at the monastery of San Salvatore at Monte Amiata in Italy, where it was highly prized and thought to be a 6th century Italian work. When the monastery was closed in the 18th century it was Illustration of Ezra, the Old Testament scribe The History of the Codex Amiatinus The Codex Amiatinus was one of three great single- volume Bibles made at Wearmouth-Jarrow, written in the 8th century. It is the earliest one-volume Latin Bible to survive in the world. Wearmouth-Jarrow had been established in the late 7th century by the nobleman Benedict Biscop. After visiting Rome, Biscop, inspired by the architecture, art, treasures, music and books of the Roman church, endeavoured to bring the best of the continent back to his native Northumbria.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Target Texts Sourced in Fontes Anglo
    Target Texts Sourced in Fontes Anglo-Saxonici Database (arranged alphabetically, by text title) Text Reference Title Author Edition Contributor C.B.19.139 Abdo, Sennes ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 163.7-164.3 C. Rauer C.B.19.038 Adrian, Natalia ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 28.1-29.12 C. Rauer C.B.19.204 Aethelburh ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 228.4-13 C. Rauer C.B.19.110 Aethelthryth ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 127.13-129.12 C. Rauer C.B.19.066 Aethelwald ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 58.1-11 C. Rauer C.B.19.149 Afra, Hilaria etc. ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 173.12-175.4 C. Rauer C.B.19.059 Agape, Chionia (Irene) ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 49.1-50.9 C. Rauer C.B.19.030 Agnes ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 22.14-23.12 C. Rauer C.B.19.171 Aidan ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 195.7-196.2 C. Rauer C.B.19.109 Alban ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 126.10-127.12 C. Rauer C.B.22.1 Alexander's Letter to Aristotle ANON (OE) Orchard 1995 C. Rauer C.B.19.071 Alexandria ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 66.3-67.7 C. Rauer C.B.19.218 All Saints ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 243.7-244.7 C. Rauer C.B.19.060 Ambrose of Milan ANON (OE Martyrology) Kotzor 1981, 2, 50.10-51.13 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The SAINTS in SACRED SCRIPTURE
    International Crusade for Holy Relics P.O. Box 21301 Los Angeles, Ca. 90021 www.ICHRusa.com The SAINTS IN SACRED SCRIPTURE. 2 Chronicles 6:41 - "And now arise, O LORD God, and go to thy resting place, thou and the ark of thy might. Let thy priests, O LORD God, be clothed with salvation, and let thy saints rejoice in thy goodness. Psalms 16:3 - As for the saints in the land, they are the noble, in whom is all my delight. Psalms 30:4 - Sing praises to the LORD, O you his saints, and give thanks to his holy name. Psalms 31:23 - Love the LORD, all you his saints! The LORD preserves the faithful, but abundantly requites him who acts haughtily. Psalms 34:9 - O fear the LORD, you his saints, for those who fear him have no want! Psalms 37:28 - For the LORD loves justice; he will not forsake his saints. The righteous shall be preserved for ever, but the children of the wicked shall be cut off. Psalms 79:2 - They have given the bodies of thy servants to the birds of the air for food, the flesh of thy saints to the beasts of the earth. Psalms 85:8 - Let me hear what God the LORD will speak, for he will speak peace to his people, to his saints, to those who turn to him in their hearts. Psalms 97:10 - The LORD loves those who hate evil; he preserves the lives of his saints; he delivers them from the hand of the wicked.
    [Show full text]