How to Write a Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How to Write a Thesis How to Write a Thesis How to Write a Thesis U E translated by Caterina Mongiat Farina and Geoff Farina foreword by Francesco Erspamer The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2015 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Translated from the original Italian, Come si fa una tesi di laurea: le materie umanistiche, © 1977/2012 Bompiani/RCS Libri S.p.A., Via Angelo Rizzoli 8 – 20132 Milano All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email [email protected]. his book was set in Chapparal Pro by the MIT Press. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. isbn: 978-0-262-52713-2 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Foreword by Francesco Erspamer ix Translators’ Foreword xv Introduction to the Original 1977 Edition xix Introduction to the 1985 Edition xxiii 1 THE DEFINITION AND PURPOSE OF THE THESIS 1.1 What Is a Thesis, and Why Is It Required? 1 1.2 For Whom Is This Book Written? 4 1.3 The Usefulness of a Thesis after Graduation 5 1.4 Four Obvious Rules for Choosing a Thesis Topic 7 2 CHOOSING THE TOPIC 2.1 Monograph or Survey? 9 2.2 Historical or Theoretical? 13 2.3 Ancient or Contemporary? 16 2.4 How Long Does It Take to Write a Thesis? 17 2.5 Is It Necessary to Know Foreign Languages? 22 2.6 “Scientific” or Political? 26 2.6.1 What Does It Mean to Be Scientific? 26 2.6.2 Writing about Direct Social Experience 32 2.6.3 Treating a “Journalistic” Topic with Scientific Accuracy 35 2.7 How to Avoid Being Exploited by Your Advisor 42 vi Contents 3 CONDUCTING RESEARCH 3.1 The Availability of Primary and Secondary Sources 45 3.1.1 What Are the Sources of a Scientific Work? 45 3.1.2 Direct and Indirect Sources 50 3.2 Bibliographical Research 54 3.2.1 How to Use the Library 54 3.2.2 Managing Your Sources with the Bibliographical Index Card File 58 3.2.3 Documentation Guidelines 62 3.2.4 An Experiment in the Library of Alessandria 79 3.2.5 Must You Read Books? If So, What Should You Read First? 103 4 THE WORK PLAN AND THE INDEX CARDS 4.1 The Table of Contents as a Working Hypothesis 107 4.2 Index Cards and Notes 115 4.2.1 Various Types of Index Cards and Their Purpose 115 4.2.2 Organizing the Primary Sources 123 4.2.3 The Importance of Readings Index Cards 126 4.2.4 Academic Humility 142 5 WRITING THE THESIS 5.1 The Audience 145 5.2 How to Write 147 5.3 Quotations 156 5.3.1 When and How to Quote: 10 Rules 156 5.3.2 Quotes, Paraphrases, and Plagiarism 164 5.4 Footnotes 167 5.4.1 The Purpose of Footnotes 167 5.4.2 The Notes and Bibliography System 170 5.4.3 The Author-Date System 174 5.5 Instructions, Traps, and Conventions 179 5.6 Academic Pride 183 Contents vii 6 THE FINAL DRAFT 6.1 Formatting the Thesis 186 6.1.1 Margins and Spaces 186 6.1.2 Underlining and Capitalizing 188 6.1.3 Sections 190 6.1.4 Quotation Marks and Other Signs 191 6.1.5 Transliterations and Diacritics 195 6.1.6 Punctuation, Foreign Accents, and Abbreviations 199 6.1.7 Some Miscellaneous Advice 204 6.2 The Final Bibliography 208 6.3 The Appendices 212 6.4 The Table of Contents 214 7 CONCLUSIONS 221 Notes 225 FOREWORD How to Write a Thesis was first published in 1977 in Italy, where it has remained in print ever since. Not only has the book provided instruction and inspiration for generations of Italian students, but it has been translated into seventeen languages, including Persian (1996), Russian (2001), and Chinese (2003). Remarkably, given the book’s success, in an era when editorial facelifts, sequels, and new editions have become publishing norms, the book has not been revised or updated, apart from an augmented introduction that Umberto Eco wrote for the 1985 edition. Its durable rules and sound advice have remained constant, despite passing trends and changing technologies. I am not sure whether this qualifies it as a classic. A clas- sic, Italo Calvino wrote, is a work which relegates the noise of the present to a background hum—but without rendering that hum inaudible. Indeed, at first glance, this book may seem incompatible with our present, considering that chap- ter 6 is typewritten rather than word-processed (with under- lining to render italics!) and that chapter 4 includes repro- ductions of index cards with handwritten corrections and additions. As unfamiliar as this way of taking notes may be to today’s students, it evokes nostalgic memories for those of us who attended college before the 1990s. The persistence of How to Write a Thesis is not due to nostalgia, however, nor do I think it is because it renders the noise of the present remote. I believe the book’s staying power has to do with the very essence of the humanities. x Foreword by Francesco Erspamer The humanities are not a body of texts, objects, and infor- mation that we inherited from the past—either a remote past or one so recent that we perceive it as our present, although as soon as we examine it we understand that it is irrevocably gone. The humanities are the process of pres- ervation and appropriation of that pastness, a process that requires specific skills acquired through practice, as all skills are. This book teaches a techne, in the Greek sense of applied and context-related knowledge—a sort of craftsmanship. This is why its title is not, say, What Is a Thesis?, an ontolog- ical question. Its avowed objective, the thesis, is actually less important than the occurrence of writing it, of “making” it: how to write a thesis. Umberto Eco takes us back to the orig- inal purpose of theses and dissertations as defining events that conclude a program of study. They are not a test or an exam, nor should they be. They are not meant to prove that the student did his or her homework. Rather, they prove that students can make something out of their education. This is particularly important today, when we are more accustomed to thinking in compliance with the software of our laptop or doing research according to the logic of a tablet than to thinking and researching in a personal and indepen- dent way. Written in the age of typewriters, card catalogs, and writing pads, How to Write a Thesis is less about the final outcome than about the path and method of arriving there. For Aristotle, knowledge was pursued for its own sake, and such a pursuit could be justified only by an instinctive drive and the intellectual pleasure generated by the fulfillment of that instinct. For Kant, aesthetics and judgment were based on disinterestedness: they could not be programmed, only experienced. The humanities are intrinsically creative and innovative. They are about originality and invention, not discovery. This is precisely Eco’s testimony; even more than a technical manual, this book is an invitation to ingenuity, a tribute to imagination. By exposing twenty-first-century students to long-estab- lished practices of scholarly research, this book will introduce them to the core skills that constitute the writing of a thesis: finding an important and intriguing topic, being thorough, taking pride in one’s work, giving thoughts time to develop, Foreword by Francesco Erspamer xi identifying with a subject, and being resourceful in locating information about it. That is exactly what this book did for me, as a student and young scholar. How to Write a Thesis was first published just as I was beginning to think about writing my own thesis, and it was from the Italian edition of this book (Come si fa una tesi di laurea) that I learned how to choose a topic, how to look for sources and prepare a bib- liography, how to use my library’s research systems, how to organize and prioritize information, and finally how to write a captivating and professional dissertation. It remained an indispensable reference source to me for years, long after I had defended and published my thesis. When I began work- ing at the University of Rome, I recommended it to my own students. Many professors in Italy today still refer their stu- dents to it, and many university websites in other countries quote long passages from the book as part of the protocol for students to become familiar with before they write a thesis. And yet, when I moved to the United States in 1993, I was not sure whether it made sense to bring How to Write a Thesis with me. Moving one’s library to a new place always involves questions about one’s future priorities: I distinctly remem- ber taking up the book, turning over a few pages, balancing it in my hand, and hesitating. Things were changing quickly. Eco’s methods of organizing and filing information were still effective, but word processors and the Internet were beginning to offer exciting alternatives to long-established research and writing techniques.
Recommended publications
  • On the Monitor, Darkly. from Mediation to Media by Way of Reality 73
    Siegener Periodicum zur Internationalen____ Empirischen______ Literaturwissenschaft Herausgegeben von Reinhold Viehoff (Halle/Saale) Gebhard Rusch (Siegen) Jg. 25 (2006), Heft 1 Peter Lang Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften SPIEL Siegener Periodicum zur Internationalen Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft SPIEL: Siegener Periodicum zur Internationalen Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft Jg. 25 (2006), Heft 1 Peter Lang Frankfurt am Main • Berlin • Bern • Bruxelles • New York • Oxford • Wien Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://www.d-nb.de> abrufbar. ISSNISSN 2199-80780722-7833 © Peter Lang GmbH Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften Frankfurt am Main 2009 Alle Rechte Vorbehalten. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. www.peterlang.de Siegener Periodicum zur Internationalen Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft SPIEL 25 (2006), H. 1 Mediale Wende - Ansprüche, Konzepte und Diskurse / Mediatic turn - Claims, Concepts, and Discourses hrsg. von / ed. by Theo Hug (Innsbruck) Die Heftbezeichnung SPIEL 25 (2006), H. 1 ist produktionstechnischen Gründen geschuldet und bezieht sich nicht auf das tatsächliche Erscheinungsjahr dieses Bandes, 2008. Dafür bittet die Redaktion um Verständnis. Das Heft wird zitiert: Theo Hug (Hg.), 2008: Mediale Wende - Ansprüche, Konzepte und Diskurse. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. (= special issue SPIEL, 25 (2006), H. 1). Owing to technical reasons of production, the title SPIEL 25 (2006), H. 1 does not refer to the actual year of publication of this issue. The editorial team asks for the readers’ indulgence.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern Narration in Umberto Eco's the Name of The
    Shanlax International Journal of English 1 Umberto Eco, Italy‟s most celebrated philosopher, semiotician, literary critic, linguist and novelist, is widely acclaimed for many of his influential scholarly works. His novels The Name of the Rose, Foucault’s Pendulum, Baudolino, An Island of the Day Before, Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana, The Prague Cemetery have gained much adulation from his readers. His recent novel Numero Zero has also earned greater Dr. B. Kathiresan popularity. An exceptional narrative style imposed in these Associate Professor of English novels identifies them predominantly with postmodern Thiruvalluvar University literature. The Name of the Rose is a postmodern novel where Eco recites a fictious tale of Adso of Melk who inturn narrates S.Pushpanjali his past to the readers. Adso‟s story deals with William along Research Scholar, Thiruvalluvar University with his novice Adso, solving the mystery of seven bizarre deaths that occurs in the Benadictine Monastery where they come o n a mission to partake in a theological disputation. The postmodern narration in the novel harnesses temporal distortion and unreliable narration. Temporal distortion refers to a technique that the postmodern authors implement in their novels to convey the story. It includes employing features like fragmentation and non- linear narration. Fragmentation is the disarray of events whereas non-linear narration is the usage of distorted timeline in the portrayal of events. A novel, in general, usually incorporates a structure that assembles the compendium of information belonging to the story in an organized fashion. When this fabrication breaks, there is an interruption in the disposal of the events of the story, affecting the totality of meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngafilms-Umberto-Eco-And-Film.Pdf
    The universe of action depicted by the cinema is already a universe of signs. — umberto eco, “sulle articolazioni del codice cinematografico” 1 IPERSIGNIFICATO: UMBERTO ECO AND FILM A literary and cultural giant whose influence can be seen in many aspects of our rapidly evolving media, Umberto Eco (1932 – 2016) produced a critical oeuvre that remains import- ant to the study of cinema. Throughout decades of interdis- ciplinary writing, Eco seamlessly moved between academic work, semiotic analysis, acclaimed novels, and more informal cultural commentary, leaving indelible marks on each area. Eco once explained his approach as concerned “with the problems of language, communication, organization of the systems of signs that we use to describe the world and to tell it to one another,” acknowledging the relationship between his own work and the field of semiotics.2 A tracing of Eco’s theories inevitably recounts the history of cinema and reveals a mutual development. The film series at the National Gallery to cinematic language; if language is traditionally a pragmatic of Art illustrates the inextricable link between his work and its solution through which meaning is inevitably impoverished, subject matter, as the cinema itself was informed and chal- the moving image allows us to reclaim some of that meaning, lenged by his theoretical approach while also enriched by his a result the writer would refer to as ipersignificato.3 contributions. The films presented in the Gallery’s series distill Eco’s work Although his direct encounters with filmmaking were fleet- and map his critical footsteps, following a loose chronology ing — among them a near screenwriting collaboration with that illustrates the development of the theory and practice of Michelangelo Antonioni — Eco was, among many other filmmaking over the past century, while noting the progres- innovative roles, a founding father of film semiotics, a disci- sive awareness of what a language of film has the potential to pline propelled forward in a series of memorable debates at be.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco, Umberto Y Martini, Carlo Maria – En Qué Creen Los Que No Creen
    http://biblioteca.d2g.com ¿En qué creen los que no creen? Umberto Eco Carlo Maria Martini (Arzobispo de Milán) http://biblioteca.d2g.com En que creen los que no creen? Un diálogo sobre la ética en el fin del milenio Umberto Eco Carlo Maria Martini (Arzobispo de Milán) Con la intervención de Emanuele Severino Manlio Sgalambro Eugenio Scalfari Indro Montanelli Vittorio Foa Claudio Martelli Traducción de Carlos Gumpert Melgosa temas de hoy. http://biblioteca.d2g.com Este libro no podrá ser reproducido, ni total ni parcialmente, sin el previo permiso escrito del editor. Todos los derechos reservados. © 1996, Atlantide Editoriale S. p. A. © 1997, EDICIONES TEMAS DE HOY, S.A. (T.H.) Edición en español realizada con la mediación de la Agencia Letteraria Eulama Título original: In cosa crede chi non crede? Paseo de la Castellana, 28. 20046 Madrid Diseño de cubierta: Rudesindo de la Fuente Fotografías de cubierta: Cover (Umberto Eco) y Contífoto (Cario Maria Martini) Primera edición: octubre de 1997 ISBN (edición italiana): 88-86838-03-4 ISBN (edición española): 84-7880-876-0 Compuesto en J. A. Diseño Editorial, S. L. Reimpresión para Editorial Planeta Argentina S.A.I.C. Independencia 1668, 1100, Bs. As. Primera edición argentina: mayo de 1998 Hecho el depósito que prevé la ley 11.723 ISBN: 950-730-039-2 Impreso en la Argentina http://biblioteca.d2g.com Este libro El diálogo epistolar entre el cardenal Cario Maria Martini y Umberto Eco, que ocupa la primera parte del presente libro, dio comienzo en el primer número de la revista Liberal —aparecido el 22 de marzo de 1995— y prosiguió con ritmo trimestral.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlo Maria Martini, Umberto
    Carlo Maria Martini Umberto Eco IN COSA CREDE CHI NON CREDE ? CON INTERVENTI DI EMANUELE SEVERINO MANLIO SGALAMBRO EUGENIO SCALFARI INDRO MONTANELLI VITTORIO FOA CLAUDIO MARTELLI Indice IX Questo libro I. Dialoghi 5 UMBERTO ECO , L'ossessione laica della nuova Apocalisse 13 CARLO MARIA MARTINI , La speranza fa della Fine "un fine" 21 UMBERTO ECO , Quando inizia la vita umana? 29 CARLO MARIA MARTINI , La vita umana partecipa della vita di Dio 37 UMBERTO ECO , I maschi e le femmine secondo la Chiesa 51 CARLO MARIA MARTINI , La Chiesa non soddisfa attese, celebra misteri 61 CARLO MARIA MARTINI , Dove trova il laico la luce del bene? 69 UMBERTO ECO , Quando entra in scena l'altro, nasce l'etica II. Coro 83 EMANUELE SEVERINO , La tecnica è il tramonto di ogni buona fede 95 MANLIO SGALAMBRO , Il bene non può fondarsi su un Dio omicida 99 EUGENIO SCALFARI , Per agire moralmente affidiamoci all'istinto 109 INDRO MONTANELLI , Della mancanza di fede come ingiustizia 113 VITTORIO FOA , Come vivo nel mondo, ecco il mio fondamento 117 CLAUDIO MARTELLI , Il credo laico dell'umanesimo cristiano III. Ripresa 135 CARLO MARIA MARTINI , Ma l'etica ha bisogno della verità 146 Indice dei nomi Questo libro Questo libro inaugura la collana dei "Sentieri" di liberal, che nasce per rendere autonome e ancora più visibili le grandi direttrici di ricerca in cui la nostra rivista impegna le proprie energie, unite ai contributi di molti importanti collaboratori. Il dialogo epistolare tra il cardinale Carlo Maria Martini e Umberto Eco, che compone la prima parte, prese avvio sul primo numero di liberal - uscito il 22 marzo 1995 - ed è proseguito con cadenza trimestrale.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Thomas Bernhard, Italo Calvino, Elena Ferrante, and Claudio Magris: from Postmodernism to Anti-Semitism
    Ten Thomas Bernhard, Italo Calvino, Elena Ferrante, and Claudio Magris: From Postmodernism to Anti-Semitism Saskia Elizabeth Ziolkowski La penna è una vanga, scopre fosse, scava e stana scheletri e segreti oppure li copre con palate di parole più pesanti della terra. Affonda nel letame e, a seconda, sistema le spoglie a buio o in piena luce, fra gli applausi generali. The pen is a spade, it exposes graves, digs and reveals skeletons and secrets, or it covers them up with shovelfuls of words heavier than earth. It bores into the dirt and, depending, lays out the remains in darkness or in broad daylight, to general applause. —Claudio Magris, Non luogo a procedere (Blameless) In 1967, Italo Calvino wrote a letter about the “molto interessante e strano” (very interesting and strange) writings of Thomas Bernhard, recommending that the important publishing house Einaudi translate his works (Frost, Verstörung, Amras, and Prosa).1 In 1977, Claudio Magris held one of the !rst international conferences for the Austrian writer in Trieste.2 In 2014, the conference “Il più grande scrittore europeo? Omag- gio a Thomas Bernhard” (The Greatest European Author? Homage to 1 Italo Calvino, Lettere: 1940–1985 (Milan: Mondadori, 2001), 1051. 2 See Luigi Quattrocchi, “Thomas Bernhard in Italia,” Cultura e scuola 26, no. 103 (1987): 48; and Eugenio Bernardi, “Bernhard in Italien,” in Literarisches Kollo- quium Linz 1984: Thomas Bernhard, ed. Alfred Pittertschatscher and Johann Lachinger (Linz: Adalbert Stifter-Institut, 1985), 175–80. Both Quattrocchi and Bernardi
    [Show full text]
  • Il Castellet 'Italiano' La Porta Per La Nuova Letteratura Latinoamericana
    Rassegna iberistica ISSN 2037-6588 Vol. 38 – Num. 104 – Dicembre 2015 Il Castellet ‘italiano’ La porta per la nuova letteratura latinoamericana Francesco Luti (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, España) Abstract This paper seeks to recall the ‘Italian route’ of the critic Josep Maria Castellet in the last century, a key figure in Spanish and Catalan literature. The Italian publishing and literary worlds served as a point of reference for Castellet, and also for his closest literary companions (José Agustín Goytisolo and Carlos Barral). All of these individuals formed part of the so-called Barcelona School. Over the course of at least two decades, these men managed to build and maintain a bridge to the main Italian publishing houses, thereby opening up new opportunities for Spanish literature during the Franco era. Thanks to these links, new Spanish names gained visibility even in the catalogues of Italian publishing houses. Looking at the period from the mid- 1950s to the end of the 1960s, the article focuses on the Italian contacts of Castellet as well as his publications in Italy. The study concludes with a comment on his Latin American connections, showing how this literary ‘bridge’ between Barcelona and Italy also contributed to exposing an Italian audience to the Latin American literary boom. Sommario 1. I primi contatti. – 2. Dario Puccini e i nuovi amici scrittori. – 3. La storia italiana dei libri di Castellet. – 4. La nuova letteratura proveniente dall’America latina. Keywords Literary relationships Italy-Spain. 1950’s 1960’s. Literary criticism. Spanish poetry. Alla memoria del Professor Gaetano Chiappini e del ‘Mestre’ Castellet.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Explores Umberto Eco's Contribution to the Current Debate
    9-di martino_0Syrimis 12/19/12 2:36 PM Page 189 Between “n ew Realism ” and “w eak thought ”: umBeRto eco ’s “n egative Realism ” and the discouRse of late PostmodeRn Impegno loRedana di maRtino Summary: the recent theory of a return of realism has sparked a lively and somewhat heated debate among contemporary italian thinkers, gen - erating a split between the supporters of the philosophy of weak thought, and those who argue for an overcoming of postmodernism and the devel - opment of a new philosophy of realism. this article explores umberto eco’s contribution to this debate, focusing both on eco’s theory of “neg - ative realism” and on his latest historiographic metafiction. i argue that while eco’s recent theory further distances the author from the philoso - phy of weak thought, it does not call, as does maurizio ferraris’s philos - ophy of new realism, for an overcoming of postmodernism. instead, fol - lowing the outward shift that is typical of late postmodern impegno , eco’s later work creates a critical idiom that more clearly uses postmodernist self-awareness as a strategy to promote self-empowerment and social emancipation . this article explores umberto eco’s contribution to the current debate on the return of realism in order to shed light on the author’s position in the dis - pute between realisti— the supporters of the so-called philosophy of new realism —such as maurizio ferraris, and debolisti —the supporters of the postmodern philosophy of weak thought—such as gianni vattimo. my goal is to show that, while eco’s recent theory of “negative realism” further dis - tances the author from the philosophy of weak thought, it does not argue, as does ferraris’s philosophy of new realism, for an overcoming of postmod - ernism.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivista Di Studi Ungheresi», (XVIII), 3-2004
    Antonella Ottai, Eastern. LA commedia ungherese sulle scene italiane fra le due guerre mondiali, Roma, Bulzoni, 2010, pp. 427. La “fortuna” della letteratura ungherese in Italia ebbe inizio nella seconda metà dell’Ottocento quando, grazie al comune Risorgimento dei due popoli, l’Ungheria divenne di nuovo “interessante” per gli Italiani, come era stata qual- che secolo prima all’epoca dell’Umanesimo corviniano. Le opere dei grandi clas- sici del Romanticismo ungherese, come il poeta rivoluzionario Sándor Petőfi, i romanzi di Mór Jókai, Kálmán Mikszáth, Ferenc Herczeg vennero tradotti e pub- blicati in Italia, grazie alla grande generazione dei traduttori bilingui di Fiume, città appartenente dal 1778 al 1918 al Regno d’Ungheria nel contesto dell’Impero Asburgico.1 La stagione più intensa delle traduzioni italiane delle opere letterarie ungheresi si colloca tra le due guerre mondiali, prima di tutto negli anni Trenta. In questo periodo la cultura del fascismo italiano si andava chiudendo nei confronti delle culture anglosassoni e francofone e, per colmare la lacuna dei romanzi di intrattenimento di facile lettura francesi e inglesi, si scopriva la narrativa ungherese contemporanea. Al posto della pochade francese si presentavano sulle scene ita- liane le commedie spiritose di Ferenc Molnár e alla lettura dei romanzi di Somerset Maugham o di Roger Martin du Garde e altri in Italia si sostituiva quella delle opere degli autori ungheresi: I pagani di Ferenc Herczeg, L’avventura a Budapest di Ferenc Körmendi, i Due prigionieri di Lajos Zilahy e, soprattutto, I ragazzi di via Pál di Ferenc Molnár, oggetto di interesse da parte sia dei giovani che degli adulti (il romanzo ebbe 30 edizioni fino al 1945 e a oggi è arrivato a raddoppiarle).
    [Show full text]
  • Renato Poggioli. Between History and Literature
    Pagine di storia della slavistica Studi Slavistici x (2013): 301-310 Roberto Ludovico Renato Poggioli. Between History and Literature Until the year 2007 only two critical articles had been written on Renato Poggioli: one by his colleague at Harvard University Dante Della Terza in 1971 (Della Terza 1971), and two much more recent ones: by Giuseppe Ghini (2005), and by the Belgian scholar Laurent Béghin (2005). In addition to these two articles, Ghini had circulated a short but informative bio-bibliographical document dated 2005 on the internet. These three scholars, with over a dozen others, including historians, slavicists, italianists, and comparativists, ani- mated a three-day symposium dedicated to Renato Poggioli’s centennial by three American Universities in 2007: the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Brown University and Har- vard University. The intent of the symposium was to reignite interest in Poggioli and to re- evaluate the role he had in the twentieth century’s international literary debate. Since then a number of new publications (see for instance Pavese, Poggioli 2010), newspaper articles (Pirani 2008; Canali 2008), conferences1, reprints of Poggioli’s work (Poggioli 2012), and even television broadcasts2 have contributed to rediscovering Renato Poggioli and his legacy as a scholar and as an intellectual. The collection of essaysRenato Poggioli. An Intellectual Biography, edited by the three organizers of the 2007 symposium – Lino Pertile, Massimo Riva and myself – is the first book-length publication entirely dedicated to Poggioli. Far from wanting to provide an annotated bibliography of critical literature on Pog- gioli, these few introductory notes are meant to suggest that the scarce presence of his name in literary criticism after his death in 1963 is strictly connected with his cultural profile and the unusual trajectory of the biographical events that led him to leave Florence and Italy to pursue a career as Professor of Slavic Studies and Comparative Literature at Harvard Uni- versity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second 'Second Sex' - the Chronicle Review - the Chronicle of Higher Education Date: June 24, 2010 10:13:30 PM EDT To: [email protected] 5 Attachments, 18.2 KB
    From: Toril Moi <[email protected]> Subject: The Second 'Second Sex' - The Chronicle Review - The Chronicle of Higher Education Date: June 24, 2010 10:13:30 PM EDT To: [email protected] 5 Attachments, 18.2 KB From Evernote: The Second 'Second Sex' - The Chronicle Review - The Chronicle of Higher Education Clipped from: http://chronicle.com/article/The-Second-Second-Sex/65962/ Log In | Create a Free Account | Subscribe Now = Premium Content Thursday, June 24, 2010 Subscribe Today! HOME NEWS OPINION & IDEAS FACTS & FIGURES TOPICS JOBS ADVICE FORUMS EVENTS The Chronicle Review Commentary Brainstorm Books Letters to the Editor Academic Destinations Campus Viewpoints The Chronicle Review Home Opinion & Ideas The Chronicle Review E-mail Print Comment (10) Share June 20, 2010 The Second 'Second Sex' By Carlin Romano A book is not born, but rather becomes, a translation. The latter may be a creative reimagining of the original, a faithful mirror image, an imperfect rendering, even a scandalous distortion. Depending on one's concrete connection to the act of literary alchemy—professional translator, delighted or bemused author, satisfied or enraged Henri Cartier-Bresson, Magnum Photos publisher, savvy or naïve reader—serenity or Simone de Beauvoir, Paris, 1945 mayhem may ensue. Enlarge Image All sorts of practical factors affect a translation. Doing one may make no financial sense, or so little sense that a publisher who goes ahead may make every effort to keep costs down. A work may be peculiarly intractable thanks to rampant colloquialism, great length, or recondite local detail. An author may be cooperative, useless, or permanently useless (that is, dead).
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD DIXON Was Born in Coventry, Attended King Henry VIII School, and Graduated in Business Law at Lanchester Polytechnic, Coventry
    RICHARD DIXON was born in Coventry, attended King Henry VIII School, and graduated in Business Law at Lanchester Polytechnic, Coventry. He became a Middle Temple barrister in 1978. He practised for nine years at no. 2 Dr Johnson’s Buildings, Temple, London, in mainly criminal cases, including appearances in the Court of Appeal and House of Lords (now the Supreme Court). He left the law in 1989 and moved to Italy’s Marche region with his partner, now husband, Peter Greene. During the early 1990s, they wrote a number of guidebooks including Italy on Backroads (Duncan Petersen, 1993); 3-D City Guide: Rome (Duncan Petersen, 1995); Charming Small Hotels: Tuscany and Umbria (Duncan Petersen, 1995); Central Italy: The Versatile Guide (Duncan Petersen, 1996) and Le Marche: The Gateway to Central Italy (Aerdorica, 2000). His radio play Just Another Case was broadcast on BBC Radio 4 and BBC World Service in 1992. Daniel’s Complaint, written for theatre, received professional readings. He became a full-time translator in 1996. He has been a member of the Associazione Italiana Traduttori e Interpreti since 2009, an honorary member since 2021, and a member of the Society of Authors since 2012. Published translations: One of seven translators in the Zibaldone Project working between 2006 and 2009 on the first English translation of the Zibaldone di Pensieri by Giacomo Leopardi, edited by Michael Caesar and Franco D’Intino, and published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (New York) and Penguin Books (London), July 2013 (ISBN: 978-0-374-29682-7; 978-0-141-19440-0). The Prague Cemetery, novel by Umberto Eco; published by Harvill Secker (London) and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (New York), November 2011 (ISBN: 978-1-846-5549-1; 978-0-547-57753-1).
    [Show full text]