Saint Ethelwold by R.N.Quick 1963 (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
I WRITING MIRACLES in TENTH-CENTURY WINCHESTER
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository WRITING MIRACLES IN TENTH-CENTURY WINCHESTER by Cory Stephen Hazlehurst A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Medieval History College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham February 2011 i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis examines a number of miracle collections and hagiographies written by Winchester monks in the late tenth century. It compares three different accounts of the cult of Swithun by Lantfred, Wulfstan and Ӕlfric, as well as comparing Wulfstan‟s and Ӕlfric‟s Vita Ӕthelwoldi. There were two main objectives to the thesis. The first was to examine whether an analysis of miracle narratives could tell us anything important about how a monastic community perceived itself, especially in relation to the wider world? This was tested by applying approaches used by Thomas Head and Raymond Van Dam to an Anglo- Saxon context. -
Hyde Abbey: a Typical Benedictine Monastery of the 12Th Century
Hyde Abbey: A Typical Benedictine Monastery of the 12th Century The translation of the bones of King Alfred to Hyde Abbey in 1110 Plan of Hyde Abbey overlaid on to today’s street plan Hyde Abbey was and early stopping off In purely architectural accommodation for exceptional in its age point on the pilgrims’ terms, however, Hyde visitors and other offices. because it had the honour way from Winchester to Abbey would have been Consequently the abbey and responsibility of Canterbury. The royal very typical of Benedictine church built by Henry looking after the remains graves were set before the abbeys of the Norman I in Reading in the of King Alfred the Great High Altar while the side era. By the 12th century 1120s – inspired one can and his family. It also chapels might well have what might be regarded reasonably imagine by acquired a number of hosted the relics. Pilgrims as a standard pattern had Hyde Abbey – was very relics, notably those of St. would have processed emerged in the design much along the same lines Josse (also known as St. around the side aisles to of these abbey churches as Hyde in its layout. Judoc). This made it in absorb the holiness which along with their associated later years, an important emanated from them. cloisters, dormitories, Wherwell Abbey Romsey Abbey Hyde Abbey Winchester Cathedral Comparative length of Hyde Abbey and other contemporary abbeys and churches Capital example on display at St. Bartholomew, Hyde Building Materials Decoration Because of the Cathedral, stone was Artistically, the plain Today the Priory Church predominance of chalk necessary. -
Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................ -
Dame Elizabeth Shelley, Last Abbess of St
Dame Elizabeth Shelley, Last Abbess of St. Mary's Abbey, Winchester by JOHN PAUL I HE important Benedictine nunnery of St Mary, the Nuns' minster or Nunnaminster, was founded by Alfred the Great's wife, Eahlswith, at the end of the 9th century on Ta site near the centre of Winchester.1 Alfred's son, Edward the Elder, completed the building, and after Alfred's death, Eahlswith spent the rest of her days in the new abbey. She may even have been appointed as abbess, but according to Leland, the antiquary, it was Edburga, Edward's daughter, who became the first abbess. Nunnaminster was the earliest of three important religious houses for women to be established in Hampshire. With the creation of the large, house of Romsey in about 907 and that of Wherwell in approximately 986, the establishment of Nunnaminster exemplified the predilection of early royal founders for the spread of monastic life as a religious and civilis ing influence in the kingdom of Wessex. In the century after its foundation, the nunnery seems to have been stricken by poverty, a misfortune which was to recur in its career, but which was not peculiar to its own long history. Rather than the fact of Nunnaminster's poverty, however, it was Bishop Ethelwold's desire of introducing stricter discipline in religi ous life which prompted him almost to re-found and re-endow the nunnery in 963. Ethelwold had been a monk at Glastonbury with Dunstan and it was through Dunstan's influence that he was eventually made Bishop of Winchester.2 Acutely aware of the deterioration of English monastic life, which fell much below the monastic standards of the influential abbeys of Northern France and Flanders, it was the new Bishop who resolved upon an improvement of the religious and moral status of the monks in his large and important diocese. -
Brotherhood and Confraternity at Canterbury Cathedral Priory in the Fifteenth Century: the Evidence of John Stone’S Chronicle
Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 128 2008 BROTHERHOOD AND CONFRATERNITY AT CANTERBURY CATHEDRAL PRIORY IN THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY: THE EVIDENCE OF JOHN STONE’S CHRONICLE MERIEL CONNOR Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, Manuscript 417 is better known as the ‘Chronicle of John Stone, Monk of Christ Church, Canterbury, 1415- 1471’. The preface of the manuscript declares it to be the ‘book of brother John Stone, a monk of Christ Church Canterbury, which was composed as a result of his great work in the year 1467 in his fiftieth year as a monk’.1 In 1906, W.G. Searle published a Latin edition of this manuscript, and since that time, Searle’s text has allowed easy access to this fascinating primary source for historians of Christ Church Priory in the fifteenth- century and monastic historians in general.2 Indeed, because the text has been so readily accessible in its printed Latin form, the tendency has been to extract items of interest to a particular scholar and, until recently, little attention has been given to the original manuscript or to the composition of the work as a whole.3 Stone describes himself as the compiler of ‘these chronicles’,4 but his work does not attempt to relate the history of Christ Church Priory from its foundation, as do more traditional monastic chronicles. The surviving manuscript (a fifteenth-century copy of a fifteenth-century original) is somewhere between an annal (a list of years with notices of events recorded alongside) and a selective history of events. It focuses principally on the internal life of the priory: the celebration of the liturgy; rituals and ceremonies; the election and enthronement of archbishops; the duties of their suffragans; and even the weather. -
Peterborough Local List Project Toolbox
Peterborough Local List Project Toolbox 1 Contents What is the Local List Project, page 3 What is a Heritage Asset, page 4 Locally Listed Heritage Assets, page 5 What is a Local List, page 6 What is the purpose of a Local Heritage List, page 6 Protection of Locally Listed Assets, page 7 Local List Selection Criteria, page 8 Explanation of the Local Listing process, page 10 Guide to submitting a Local List nomination, page12 2 What is the Local List Project? As part of the governments #buildbackbetter initiative, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government in association with Historic England, provided £1.5m to 22 areas to develop their Local Lists. Peterborough was successful in its bid and has received £38,000. These 22 areas, which also includes the neighbouring Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire are test pilots in investigating different ways in which Local Lists can be developed and improved upon. The two main strands of Peterborough’s bid were its record of being at the forefront of the development of Local Lists and its proposed innovation with regard its digital submission. Peterborough was one on the first adopters of the Local List, and has been periodically adding new entries since its first adoption in 2012. Although the adopted heritage assets are concentrated in and around the city centre, the ratio of Locally Listed builds to statutorily Listed buildings of 30% is of a higher magnitude than the majority of other Local List’, demonstrating its extent. This percentage is simply a good baseline for which the project aims to substantially improve. -
Catalogue of Adoption Items Within Worcester Cathedral Adopt a Window
Catalogue of Adoption Items within Worcester Cathedral Adopt a Window The cloister Windows were created between 1916 and 1999 with various artists producing these wonderful pictures. The decision was made to commission a contemplated series of historical Windows, acting both as a history of the English Church and as personal memorials. By adopting your favourite character, event or landscape as shown in the stained glass, you are helping support Worcester Cathedral in keeping its fabric conserved and open for all to see. A £25 example Examples of the types of small decorative panel, there are 13 within each Window. A £50 example Lindisfarne The Armada A £100 example A £200 example St Wulfstan William Caxton Chaucer William Shakespeare Full Catalogue of Cloister Windows Name Location Price Code 13 small decorative pieces East Walk Window 1 £25 CW1 Angel violinist East Walk Window 1 £50 CW2 Angel organist East Walk Window 1 £50 CW3 Angel harpist East Walk Window 1 £50 CW4 Angel singing East Walk Window 1 £50 CW5 Benedictine monk writing East Walk Window 1 £50 CW6 Benedictine monk preaching East Walk Window 1 £50 CW7 Benedictine monk singing East Walk Window 1 £50 CW8 Benedictine monk East Walk Window 1 £50 CW9 stonemason Angel carrying dates 680-743- East Walk Window 1 £50 CW10 983 Angel carrying dates 1089- East Walk Window 1 £50 CW11 1218 Christ and the Blessed Virgin, East Walk Window 1 £100 CW12 to whom this Cathedral is dedicated St Peter, to whom the first East Walk Window 1 £100 CW13 Cathedral was dedicated St Oswald, bishop 961-992, -
Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 I I
INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. -
Stockton House, Wiltshire : Heritage Statement – Documentary Sources
STOCKTON HOUSE, WILTSHIRE : HERITAGE STATEMENT – DOCUMENTARY SOURCES Version 0.5 – November 26, 2014 Fig 1 : J.C. Buckler, South-West View of Stockton House, Wiltshire. dated 1810 (courtesy of Yale Center for British Art, B1991.40.75) Andrew Foyle : Stockton House Heritage Statement, Version 0.5; November 26 2014 Page 1 CONTENTS: Preamble Pages 1-2 1. Change Control Log Page 3 2. Timeline for Stockton House Page 4 2. History and Development of the Building Page 17 3. Ownership and Owners’ Biographies Page 48 4. Appendices: Document Texts Page 57 A: Rev. Thomas Miles, History of the Parish of Stockton, B : Letter from W.H. Hartley, of Sutton, to John Hughes of Stockton, Friday Feb 26th, 1773 C : Auctions of Furniture from Stockton House, 1906 and 1920 D: A visitor’s comments on Stockton House in 1898. E : Kelly’s Directory of Wiltshire, 1898 F: Inquest Report on the Death of a Gardener, 1888 G: Transcripts of Four Articles on Stockton House in Country Life (1905 and 1984) H: Excerpt from The Gardeners’ Chronicle, February 23, 1895, p. 230. Abbrevations: WHC – Wiltshire History Centre, Chippenham (formerly Wiltshire Record Office) WILBR – Wiltshire Buildings Record at Wiltshire History Centre Introduction This paper sets out the documentary sources for the architectural development, phasing and dating of Stockton House. It was prepared by Andrew Foyle to inform the conservation and repair work to be carried out by Donald Insall Associates. Andrew Foyle : Stockton House Heritage Statement, Version 0.5; November 26 2014 Page 2 CHANGE CONTROL LOG Version 0.0 issued April 22 2014 Version 0.1 issued April 28 2014 Minor typographical changes. -
The Bishop of Winchester's Deer Parks in Hampshire, 1200-1400
Proc. Hampsk. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 44, 1988, 67-86 THE BISHOP OF WINCHESTER'S DEER PARKS IN HAMPSHIRE, 1200-1400 By EDWARD ROBERTS ABSTRACT he had the right to hunt deer. Whereas parks were relatively small and enclosed by a park The medieval bishops of Winchester held the richest see in pale, chases were large, unfenced hunting England which, by the thirteenth century, comprised over fifty grounds which were typically the preserve of manors and boroughs scattered across six southern counties lay magnates or great ecclesiastics. In Hamp- (Swift 1930, ix,126; Moorman 1945, 169; Titow 1972, shire the bishop held chases at Hambledon, 38). The abundant income from his possessions allowed the Bishop's Waltham, Highclere and Crondall bishop to live on an aristocratic scale, enjoying luxuries (Cantor 1982, 56; Shore 1908-11, 261-7; appropriate to the highest nobility. Notable among these Deedes 1924, 717; Thompson 1975, 26). He luxuries were the bishop's deer parks, providing venison for also enjoyed the right of free warren, which great episcopal feasts and sport for royal and noble huntsmen. usually entitled a lord or his servants to hunt More deer parks belonged to Winchester than to any other see in the country. Indeed, only the Duchy of Lancaster and the small game over an entire manor, but it is clear Crown held more (Cantor et al 1979, 78). that the bishop's men were accustomed to The development and management of these parks were hunt deer in his free warrens. For example, recorded in the bishopric pipe rolls of which 150 survive from between 1246 and 1248 they hunted red deer the period between 1208-9 and 1399-1400 (Beveridge in the warrens of Marwell and Bishop's Sutton 1929). -
Iburtraits Qrtbhisbups Nt
iB urtraits of the ’ Qrtbhisbups nt fian tzrhury E M . B N Emm i) B Y G . V A A N D I SSU ED W I TH TH E AP P ROV AL O F Hrs G RAC E TH E A R CHB I SHOP OF CAN TER B U RY A . R . M LTD . OWB RAY CO . ON DON : G a t Ca s tl Ox f Ci c s W . L 34 re e Street , ord r u , ’ OXFO R D : 1 06 S . Alda t e s St re e t 1 908 LAM B ETH A LA P C E . E . , S , M a r h c 7 0 . , 9 8 MY DEAR M I SS B EV AN , I cordially approve of y o u r plan of publishing a series of such portraits as exist of the successive occupants of the See of Canterbury . I gather that you propose to a c c omp a ny the plates with such biographical notes as may present the facts in outline to those who have little knowledge of English Church History . I need hardly say that so far as Lambeth is c o n cerned we offer you every facility for the reproduction of pictures or seals . Such a book as you contemplate will have a peculiar f s interest this year, when the See of Canterbury orm the - pivot of a world wide gathering . a m I , Y s our very truly, Si n e d RAN DAL R ( g ) L CAN TUA . -
Greenwood Academies Trust
A proposal for two new Primary Free Schools for Northampton Upton Park & Moulton ‘Be Inspired’ About the Greenwood Academies Trust Greenwood Academies Trust The Greenwood Academies Trust (GAT) successfully sponsors 35 open academies, educating over 17,000 pupils across seven local authority areas, including Nottingham City, Nottingham- shire, Leicester City, Northamptonshire, Peterborough, Lincolnshire and Central Bedfordshire. The Greenwood Academies Trust is a ‘not for profit’ organisation. Any income received is spent for the benefit of our pupils. For more information about the Trust please visit www.greenwoodacademies.org Wayne Norrie, CEO Our Academies Our academies are led by outstanding Principals. Whilst working to achieve our organisational core values, each Principal is free to develop the curriculum and structures within their own academy to best serve their community. The Trust does not impose a standard central curriculum or structure. We have created a Trust where each academy can evolve individually, developing best practice that can be shared both within the Trust and more widely. Beacon Primary Academy 4-11 Nottingham Academy 3-19 Bishop Creighton Academy 4-11 Nottingham Girls’ Academy 11-19 City of Peterborough Academy 11-16 Purple Oaks Academy 3-18 Corby Primary Academy 4-11 Queensmead Primary Academy 3-11 Danesholme Infant Academy 3-7 Rushden Primary Academy 4-11 Danesholme Junior Academy 7-11 Seathorne Primary Academy 3-11 Dogsthorpe Academy 7-11 Skegby Junior Academy 4-11 Green Oaks Primary Academy Skegness Academy